Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Many think that layoff and retrenchment are one and the same thing but
that is not true. The biggest difference between layoff and retrenchment
is that layoff is volatile in nature. Employees are recalled, once the period
of layoff is over. Retrenchment is non-volatile. It involves full and final
termination of services.
Lay off is defined in section 2(KKK) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Lay-off
means failure, refusal, or inability of an employer to give employment to a
workman whose name is on the muster rolls of his industrial
establishment and who has not been retrenched, on the account of lack of
coal, lack of power, lack of raw material, over stocking of output, failure of
machinery, due to natural calamity, or due to any other connected reason.
The term retrenchment is defined in section 2(oo) of the Industrial
Disputes Act. Retrenchment means termination of service of an employee
by an employer for any reason other than as a punishment due to
disciplinary action. This does not include - voluntary retirement,
superannuation, non-renewal of contract, termination on the ground of
continued ill-health.
Layoff is not a right conferred upon the employer but an obligation that
the unemployment is temporary in nature and in a reasonable time the
laid off worker will be restored his position. However, there is no
indication regarding the time layoff will continue.
Retrenchment
Section 2(oo) - Retrenchment means termination of service of an
employee by an employer for any reason other than as a punishment due
to disciplinary action. This does not include - voluntary retirement,
superannuation, non-renewal of contract, termination on the ground of
continued ill-health.
Morinda Coop Sugar Mills vs Ram Kishen and others (1996) -
Workers were employed in the sugar mill only during the season and then
they ceased to work. Held that it is not retrenchment because it is only
seasonal work.
In Santosh Gupta vs SBI (1980) A worker was removed after he failed
a test that he was required to pass for confirmation of service. SC held it
to be retrenchment because termination for any reason is retrenchment
except if it is because of the reasons mentioned in the act.
Where an application for permission has been made and the appropriate
Government or the specified authority does not communicate the order
granting or refusing to grant permission to the employer within a period
of sixty days from the date on which such application is made, the
permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted on the
expiration of the said period of sixty days.
The appropriate Government or the specified authority may, either on its
own motion or on the application made by the employer or any workman,
review its order granting or refusing to grant permission or refer the
matter or, as the case may be, cause it to be referred, to a Tribunal for
adjudication
Where no application for permission under sub-section (1) is made, or
where the permission for any retrenchment has been refused, such
retrenchment shall be deemed to be illegal from the date on which the
notice of retrenchment was given to the workman and the workman shall
be entitled to all the benefits under any law for the time being in force as
if no notice had been given to him.