Phases of the DDA or Refusal

Accepts up to Good

Refusal

Bookmark individual objects; Filling in form of self-assessment; Fill Assessment

Statement by the President of the Executive Board Conference and validation by
the Coordinating Committee of Evaluation of Irregular; Joint meeting of Assessor
s for the award of the final evaluation, communication in writing to evaluated t
he proposal
Card non-delivery of individual targets, gives the classes normally; No rating,
does not count the time (1 or 2 years?) Not progressing; can compete; There is n
o disciplinary action.
Phases of the DDA or Refusal
Very Good / Excellent

Refusal

Requires; Record of Individual Objectives; Requires Assessor or not his area of

observation of 2 classes (3 at the request of Rated) by the Assessor, followed b
y interview, self-assessment form to fill in, fill in the Assessor Checklist; Fi
ll Sheet Evaluation by the President of the Executive Board Conference and valid
ation by the Coordinating Committee of Evaluation of Irregular, very good or exc
ellent; Joint meeting of Assessors for the award of the final evaluation, commun
ication in writing to the proposed Rated
Card non-delivery of individual targets, gives the classes normally; No rating,
does not count the time (1 or 2 years?) Not progressing; can compete; There is n
o disciplinary action.
Phases of the DDA or Refusal
Very Good / Excellent

Accepts up to Good
Requires; Record of Individual Objectives; Requires Assessor or not his area; Ob
servation of 2 classes (3 at the request of Rated) by the Assessor, followed by
interview; Filling in the self-assessment form, fill in the Assessor Checklist;
Fill Form Assessment by the Chairman of the Executive Council; Conference and va
lidation by the Coordinating Committee of Evaluation of Irregular, very good or
excellent; Joint meeting of Assessors for the award of the final evaluation, com
munication in writing to the proposed Rated

Bookmark individual objects; Filling in form of self-assessment; Fill Assessment

Statement by the President of the Executive Board Conference and validation by
the Coordinating Committee of Evaluation of Irregular; Joint meeting of Assessor
s for the award of the final evaluation, communication in writing to evaluated t
he proposal
Levels and results of the DDA

Excellent for two consecutive performance evaluation requires a reduction in fou

r years time teaching service required for access to the rank of full professor.
Excellent and Very good for 2 consecutive decreases in the minimum three years
of teaching experience required for access to the rank of full professor. Very g
ood for 2 consecutive decreases in the minimum two years of teaching experience
required for access to the rank of full professor. Good Rating minimum necessary
to progress. Regular. Does not progress, nor to the time of service. Training.
Insufficient. Does not progress. Can determine the conversion. Training.