Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.ache.org.rs/CICEQ
Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly 18 (4) 497508 (2012) CI&CEQ
Hydrogen fluoride is a colorless, fuming liquid or Throughout the global nuclear industry, uranium
gas with a strong, irritating odor. Hydrogen fluoride is enriched by one of two methods: gaseous diffusion
readily dissolves in water to form colorless hydro- or gas centrifuge. The gas centrifuge process uses a
fluoric acid solutions; dilute solutions are visibly indis- large number of rotating cylinders interconnected to
tinguishable from water. Hydrogen fluoride is primarily form cascades. The UF6 gas is placed in the cylinder,
an industrial raw material. It is produced commercially which is then rotated at a high speed. The rotation
by an action of sulfuric acid on the mineral fluorspar. creates a strong centrifugal force that draws more of
Hydrogen fluoride is used in separation and purifica- the heavier gas molecules toward the wall of the cy-
tion of uranium isotopes, as a cracking catalyst in oil linder, while the lighter gas molecules tend to collect
refineries, and also for etching glass and enamel, re- closer to the center. The stream that is slightly en-
moving rust, and cleaning brass and crystal. Addition- riched in U235 is withdrawn and fed into the next higher
ally, it is used in manufacturing silicon semiconductor stage, while the slightly depleted stream is recycled
chips and as a laboratory reagent. back into the next lower stage. The inventory of UF6
in a centrifuge is limited by the condensation at the
wall; the UF6 must remain in gas form in order to the
rotor will not become unbalanced and crash. For this
Correspondening author: J. Safdari, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Re- reason, uranium enrichment plants are operated under
search School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Ins- vacuum conditions. The vacuum pressure increases
titute, Tehran, Iran.
E-mail: jsafdari@aeoi.org.ir
result in the accumulation of inert or atmospheric gases
Paper received: 20 September, 2011 within the enrichment plant from small leaks. Hydro-
Paper revised: 18 January, 2012 gen fluoride is always produced in the uranium en-
Paper accepted: 30 March, 2012
497
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
richment process during the reaction of uranium the design of sorption design. Several correlations
hexafluoride with atmospheric water vapor [1]. For have been presented for the equilibrium modeling of
this reason, it is of paramount importance to remove the adsorption systems. In this work, the Langmuir,
hydrogen fluoride from the uranium enrichment pro- Freundlich and Henry isotherm models have been
cess, which is carried out under vacuum conditions. used to describe the adsorption process [15]. Lang-
Inhalation of hydrogen fluoride gas may cause muir theoretically examined the adsorption of gases
immediate or delayed-onset pulmonary edema after a on solid surfaces and considered sorption as a che-
1-hour exposure. In addition, exposure to high con- mical phenomenon. Basically, the Langmuir isotherm
centrations of the vapors of hydrofluoric acid charac- equation is in the form of hyperbolic function as fol-
teristically results in ulcerative tracheobronchitis and lows:
hemorrhagic pulmonary edema; this local reaction is
q mK LP
equivalent to gaseous hydrogen chloride. From acci- qe = (1)
dental, occupational, and volunteer exposures, it is 1 + K LP
estimated that the lowest lethal concentration for a 5- P 1 P
min human exposure to hydrogen fluoride is in the = + (2)
q e q mK L q m
range of 50 to 250 ppm. The significant exposures by
dermal or inhalation route may cause hypocalcemia where qm and KL can be determined from the linear
and hypomagnesemia; cardiac arrhythmias may fol- plot of P/qe versus P [16-19]. When the amount of
low. Acute renal failure has also been documented adsorbate adsorbed is insignificant compared with the
after an ultimately fatal inhalation exposure. Repeated adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, the Langmuir
exposure to excessive concentrations of fluoride over equation is reduced to the following equation (Henry
a period of years results in increasing density of bone Equation):
and eventually may cause crippling fluorosis (osteo-
q e = HP (3)
sclerosis caused by the deposition of fluoride in bone).
As a means to treat gaseous emissions, adsorp- The Freundlich expression is an empirical equa-
tion has achieved prominence for being efficient even tion based on sorption on a heterogeneous surface
at low pollutant concentration levels and for making it and is commonly presented as follows:
possible the discretionary recovery of the pollutant
through adsorption [1]. The adsorption of polluting q e = K FP 1/ n (4)
gases can be attained by using a number of adsor- where KF and n can be determined from the linear plot
bents [3-5]. Activated carbon is the most popular and of log qe versus log P.
versatile adsorbent, have traditionally been used in
the removal of scent, taste, and color caused by the Adsorption kinetic models
presence of the pollutants in gaseous or liquid mix- Adsorption kinetics is another basic requirement
tures [6-8]. for the design of the adsorption systems. Several kin-
The treatment of the hydrogen fluoride found in etic models have been presented for the adsorption
effluents by using adsorption in alumina. Therefore, kinetic modeling. In this study, we have used the
some other researchers [9-14] have studied on other pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models
adsorbent materials, while there is no data available to test the experimental data of the HF gas adsorption
on the adsorption of hydrogen fluoride by using acti- by activated carbon. The pseudo-first-order equation,
vated carbon under vacuum conditions. developed by Lagergren, is expressed as follows
In the present work, the adsorption of hydrogen [20,21]:
fluoride onto activated carbon has been investigated
dq t
in vacuum conditions for absolute pressures less than = k 1 (q e q t ) (5)
dt
60 mbar. The Langmuir, Freundlich and Henry ad-
sorption models are used to determine the isotherm In this model, the rate of occupation of adsorp-
parameters associated with the adsorption process. tion sites is proportional to the number of unoccupied
The adsorption mechanism of HF onto activated car- sites. Integration of Eq. 5 with respect to t gives:
bon is evaluated in terms of kinetics and thermody-
k1
namics. log (q e q t ) = log q e t (6)
2.303
Mathematical description
where k1 and qe can be determined from the linear
Adsorption isotherms plot of log (qe qt) versus t. The pseudo-second-order
The study of equilibrium isotherms is fundamen- equation, the Ho and McKay model, is expressed as
tal in supplying the essential information required for follows:
498
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
499
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
16 30
14
25
12
20
10
q (mg/g)
q (mg/g)
8 15
90
50
80
70
40
60
q (mg/g)
q (mg/g)
30 50
40
20 Second carbon with 20 mbar initial pressure
30 Second carbon with 40 mbar initial pressure
20
10 Experimental data at 28 C Experimental data at 28 C
Experimental data at 40 C 10 Experimental data at 40 C
Experimental data at 55 C Experimental data at 55 C
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
t (min) t (min)
120
100
80
q (mg/g)
60
20
Experimental data at 28 C
Experimental data at 40 C
Experimental data at 55 C
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
t (min)
Figure 2. Effect of contact time on the HF gas adsorption by the activated carbon at temperatures of 28, 40 and 55 C.
500
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
10, 20, 20, 40 and 60 mbar, respectively. This figure plied for the design purposes. In this investigation, in
also shows that the sorption takes place in two order to get the equilibrium data, initial pressures of
stages. The first stage can be attributed to the imme- the HF gas were changed while the absorbent weight
diate utilization of the most readily available adsorb- in each experiment was kept constant.
ing sites on the adsorbent surface. The second stage The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Henry adsorption
may be attributed to very slow diffusion of the adsorb- models were used to determine the isotherm para-
ate from the surface site into the inner pores. Thus, meters associated with the adsorption process. The
the initial part of HF adsorption by activated carbon constants of these models as well as the values of R2
may be governed by the initial interparticle transport and AARE% are given in Table 3. From R2 and AARE%
of HF controlled by surface diffusion process and the values in Table 3, it is clear that the Freundlich model
second part controlled by pore diffusion [23]. predicts experimental data better than the other mo-
dels. Figure 3 also shows the comparison of experi-
Study of the effect of initial pressure and temperature
mental data with the qe values obtained by applying
Table 2 shows the adsorption of the HF gas onto these models.
activated carbons as a function of initial pressure of The maximum capacity, qm, determined from the
the HF gas and temperature at equilibrium conditions. Langmuir equation defines the total capacity of the
According to this table, the adsorption of the HF gas adsorption for the HF gas. The qm decreases with an
decreases by increasing temperature up to 55 C. increase in temperature. The value of qm obtained at
This shows that the adsorption of the HF gas on all 28 C appears to be higher in comparison with uptake
activated carbons is controlled by an exothermic pro- obtained at other temperatures. The higher value of
cess. The sorption of the HF gas onto activated car- KL also implied strong bonding of HF to activated car-
bons may involve not only a physical but also a che- bon at this temperature.
mical sorption. This effect may be due to the fact that
at higher temperature a decrease in active sites oc- Study of kinetic models
curs due to bond rupture. In order to clarify the adsorption kinetics of HF
The adsorption capacity also increases by an onto activated carbon Lagergren pseudo-first-order
increase in initial gas pressure because it provides a and pseudo-second-order kinetic models are applied
driving force to overcome mass transfer resistance to the experimental data.
between adsorbent and adsorption medium. So higher For example, Figure 4 shows the experimental
sorption capacities are obtained at higher initial data fitted to the pseudo-first-order model for the first
pressures of the HF gas at all temperature studied. type activated carbon and Figure 5 indicates the ex-
perimental data fitted to the pseudo-second-order mo-
Study of adsorption isotherms
del for the second type activated carbon. The ob-
The analysis of experimental equilibrium data is tained results were shown in Tables 4-6. As it can
important for developing an equation that can be ap-
501
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
Table 3. The constants obtained for Freundlich, Langmuir and Henry equations
180
Experimental data
160 Experimental data Langmuir Model
160
Langmuir Model Freundlich Model
140 Freundlich Model 140
Henry Model
Henry Model
120 120
100 100
q (mg/g)
q (mg/g)
80 80
60 60
0 0
5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
P (mbar) P (mbar)
180
Experimental data
Langmuir Model
160
Freundlich Model
Henry Model
140
120
100
q (mg/g)
80
60
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
P (mbar)
Figure 3. Comparison between adsorption isotherms of Freundlich, Langmuir and Henry with experimental data.
502
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
2 2
First carbon with 5 mbar initial pressure First carbon with 10 mbar initial pressure
1 1
0 0
Log(q-qe)
-1
Log(q-qe)
-1
-2 -2
-3 -3
2
Experimental data at 28 C Experimental data at 28 C
1.8
Experimental data at 40 C Experimental data at 40 C
1.6
Experimental data at 55 C 1.6 Experimental data at 55 C
1.2
Log(q-qe)
Log(q-qe)
1.2
1 First carbon with 40 mbar initial pressure
1 0.8
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.6
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15
t(min) t(min)
2.2
Experimental data at 28 C
2.1
Experimental data at 40 C
2 Experimental data at 55 C
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
0 5 10 15
t(min)
Figure 4. Pseudo-first-order kinetic plots for the HF gas adsorption onto activated carbon.
503
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
6 4
5
3
4
3 2
2
1
1
Second carbon with 5 mbar initial pressure Second carbon with 10 mbar initial pressure
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
t(min) t(min)
6 10
Experimental data at 28 C Experimental data at 28 C
9
Experimental data at 40 C Experimental data at 40 C
5 Experimental data at 55 C Experimental data at 55 C
8
7
4
t/q (min g/mg)
3 5
4
2
3
2
1
1
Second carbon with 20 mbar initial pressure Second carbon with 40 mbar initial pressure
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
t(min) t(min)
6
Experimental data at 28 C
Experimental data at 40 C
5 Experimental data at 55 C
4
t/q (min g/mg)
Figure 5. Plot of t/q versus t for the HF gas adsorption onto activated carbon (the pseudo-first-order kinetic model).
504
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
Table 4. Kinetic parameters obtained for HF adsorption onto the first type of activated carbon
Table 5. Kinetic parameters obtained for HF adsorption onto the second type of activated carbon
Initial P qe,exp First order kinetic equation Second order kinetic equation
T / C
mbar mg/g qe / mg g1 k1102 / min1 R2 AARE, % qe,2 / mg g1 3
k210 / g mg min
1
R2 AARE, %
5 28 14.28 12.54 63.82 92.62 14.17 13.74 64.73 99.33 6.36
10 28 28 25.58 51.91 94.25 13.81 27.51 26.22 99.56 5.78
20 28 53.09 50.38 49.24 96.26 12.02 53.98 12.61 99.90 4.29
30 28 78 66.97 53.78 93.65 13.31 69.57 11.06 99.62 5.78
40 28 90.38 75.01 58.78 92.21 12.80 78.2 11.27 99.72 4.00
60 28 119.05 98 54.04 91.80 13.64 102.2 7.941 99.66 4.58
5 40 12.18 12.11 79.84 97.35 11.82 12.37 94.23 99.77 5.14
10 40 22.19 21.32 86.01 98.18 10.70 22.49 50.24 99.61 5.93
20 40 47.95 41.35 85.28 93.87 11.99 45.29 23.19 99.63 6.55
40 40 72.71 58.19 88.02 96.20 12.31 63.64 18.1 99.32 6.85
60 40 107.92 78.47 89.2 94.51 12.19 85.65 13.74 98.84 7.06
5 55 10.91 9.729 80.25 95.79 9.97 11.01 78.16 99.75 4.89
10 55 16.29 14.49 87.85 96.03 10.55 16.26 66.88 99.62 4.61
20 55 36.25 36.25 25.24 94.62 27.92 36.73 12.43 97.37 19.36
40 55 63.18 42.76 91.1 92.82 16.89 47.26 24.93 97.98 11.72
60 55 87.65 87.65 17.71 94.28 29.79 87.97 4.227 97.64 19.63
Table 6. Kinetic parameters obtained for HF adsorption onto the third type of activated carbon
Initial P qe,exp First order kinetic equation Second order kinetic equation
T / C
mbar mg/g qe / mg g1 k1102 / min1 R2 AARE, % qe,2 / mg g1 3
k210 / g mg min
1
R2 AARE, %
5 28 14.21 12.98 56.61 96.43 10.73 14.1 58.93 99.27 5.41
10 28 26.00 23.88 104.1 98.17 9.89 26.08 52.07 99.82 3.98
20 28 52.38 45.31 63.78 97.2 11.58 50.81 16.24 99.83 4.41
30 28 73.88 64.14 57.41 97.92 13.60 70.56 10.43 99.14 6.91
40 28 94.58 92.03 41.33 97.28 14.30 92.66 7.4 99.02 7.42
60 28 121.04 115.9 68.29 97.06 15.34 116.8 8.253 98.74 7.94
5 40 12.16 12.16 118.1 98.51 10.24 12.31 158.1 99.82 3.57
505
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
Table 6. Continued
Initial P qe,exp First order kinetic equation Second order kinetic equation
T / C
mbar mg/g qe / mg g1 k1102 / min1 R2 AARE, % qe,2 / mg g1 3
k210 / g mg min
1
R2 AARE, %
10 40 21.03 20.69 126.4 98.72 8.50 21.16 107.3 99.86 2.46
20 40 45.22 40.32 128 94.62 9.38 43.01 44.56 99.63 4.30
40 40 79.99 58.18 109.5 94.42 13.44 63.3 22.4 98.56 8.53
60 40 109.45 75.78 110.3 94.25 12.56 81.32 17.92 98.02 8.09
5 55 10.37 9.92 97.3 90.33 13.67 10.48 136.3 99.46 6.82
10 55 17.13 16.13 133.5 91.78 10.25 17.24 106.9 99.69 4.26
20 55 36.34 30.67 131.9 92.53 11.11 32.7 61.29 99.12 6.15
40 55 69.39 48.21 129.1 95.01 12.04 51.03 38.81 97.84 7.51
60 55 86.92 59.16 131.8 94.47 11.69 62.1 33.64 97.21 7.45
be seen from these tables, the correlation coefficient (10). The values of thermodynamic parameters are
(R2) for the pseudo-first-order rate equation was given in Table 7. The negative Go values indicate
found to be lower than 98.72 and for the pseudo-se- that thermodynamically feasible and spontaneous
cond-order was greater than 97.2. Also, the average nature of adsorption of HF on activated carbon. The
absolute values of relative error (AARE%) for equa- negative Ho values indicate the exothermic nature of
tions of the pseudo-first-order and the pseudo-se- the adsorption of HF onto activated carbon in the tem-
cond-order were 14.5 and 7.6%, respectively. Hence, perature range of 28-55 C. For the first type activated
it was concluded that the HF gas adsorption by acti- carbon, the negative value of So suggests a de-
vated carbon was better described by the pseudo-se- crease in randomness at solid/gas interface during
cond-order rate equation than by the pseudo-first-or- the adsorption process, and positive So values were
der rate equation. obtained for the second and third type of activated
carbon.
Study of adsorption thermodynamics
According to Eq. (11), (Ho) and (So) para- CONCLUSIONS
meters can be calculated from the slope and intercept
of a plot of ln KL versus 1/T, respectively (Figure 6). The adsorption process of hydrogen fluoride on
The Gibbs free energy is also calculated from Eq. activated carbon was investigated under vacuum
506
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
Table 7. Thermodynamic parameters obtained for the HF adsorption onto activated carbon
507
H. BAHRAMI et al.: ADSORPTION OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ONTO ACTIVATED CARBON CI&CEQ 18 (4) 497508 (2012)
[18] Y. Liu, Y. J. Liu, Sep. Purif. Technol. 61 (2008) 229-242 [22] U. Walter, Fundamental of Vacuum Technology, Laybold
[19] A.Y. Dursun, Biochem. Eng. J. 28 (2006) 187-195 Vacuum Products and Reference Book, 2002
[20] A.W.M. Ip, J.P. Barford, G. McKay, Chem. Eng. J. 157 [23] Z. Xusan, Y. Tang, X. Li, Y. Liu, F. Luo, Biochem .Eng. J.
(2010) 434-442 3 (2006) 160-164.
[21] F. Ferrero, J. Environ. Sci. 22 (2010) 467-473
508