CTR Pack

CTR FORM
COST TIME & RESOURCE
PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :
CONTRACTOR:
CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited
Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :
CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Rev :
1010 Project Management
Author :
Objective
To perform the project and interface management activities associated with implementation of the subsea FEED.
Activities Description
Subsea FEED team management

Schedule management and progress reporting
Liaison with Client
Definition of codes and standards
Change control
Weekly reporting and progress meetings
Overseeing development of final FEED documentation and ITT packages
Input Requirements
Output / Deliverables
FEED schedule
Schedule management and progress reporting
Liaison with Client
Definition of codes and standards
Change control
Weekly reporting and progress meetings
Overseeing development of final FEED documentation and ITT packages
Notes, Assumptions, etc
Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :
Name: . Name: .
Signature: .. Signature: ...
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Agreed By : Approved By :
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1020 Quality Assurance
Author :
Objective
Quality Assurance for the Subsea FEED
Develop and issue QA Manual for project use during subsea FEED
Develop and Issue QA Plan for subsea FEED
Input Requirements
Subsea FEED QA Manual

QA Plan for FEED
Audit Schedule
Audit Reports
Corrective Action Reports
Follow-up Reports
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1030 Document Control
Author :
Objective
Management of Project Documents
Produce Subsea FEED Document Control Manual

Maintain Document Register
Control and issue outgoing documentation
Receipt and control of incoming documentation
Input Requirements
Key deliverable dates

Deliverables Schedule (CTR 1050)
Master Document Register (MDR)
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1040 FMECA and RAM Studies
Author :
Objective
Define sparing and redundancy philosophy for subsea facilities
Perform a FMECA study to identify, record and understand potential failure modes and uncertainties
Quantify reliability and availability of individual items of equipment
Development of models to quantify reliability, availability and maintainability of each defined system to cover turn-up,
operational and mechanical cases
Input Requirements
Client supplied reliability data

Manufacturers data
OREDA
Report on FMECA studies

Report on RAM studies
Input to project Sparing Philosophy for subsea facilities

CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1050 Scheduling
Author :
Objective
Planning services to the overall project plan
Generate and maintain a Level 2 schedule for the overall subsea development from FEED to project completion. The
project schedule shall reflect and integrate Client milestones and planned field activities
Identify a Consents and Approvals schedule
Integrate data from procurement support
Input Requirements
Information from procurement support (CTR 1060)
Level 2 schedule for post-FEED activities
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1060 Procurement Support
Author :
Objective
To establish a subsea Long lead Item (LLI) List for the project (taking into account of, but not limited to, COMPANY
Frame Agreement items)
To develop a post-FEED subsea procurement plan for the project
To develop technical specifications and datasheets for long lead items included (but not limited to) COMPANY Frame
Agreement items.
Support Company in the technical evaluation of offered components under the frame agreement
Assist Company in developing all technical documentation for the frame agreement work order packages including scope
of supply, supplier data requirements list (SDRL) etc in the requisition documentation
Contact with vendors to establish current (and future) expected lead times for equipment and materials supply (outwith
COMPANYs Frame Agreements)
Discuss and agree likely durations for post FEED procurement activities
Develop specifications and data sheets
Assist with technical queries during tendering period
Carry out technical evaluation of tenders
Assist in the development of work order package requisitions, SDRLs.
Input Requirements
Definition of subsea facilities and equipment required
Subsea Long Lead Items (LLI) List

Produce Vendor Bid Lists for the identified LLI
Post-FEED procurement plan for input into the overall project schedule (Level 2)
Specifications,
Technical evaluation criteria,
Requisition and SDRL development
Company is expecting 3 Frame agreement tenders per frame agreement type. Contractor should anticipate technical
queries and technical evaluation with 3 tenderers.
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1070 Cost Estimating
Author :
Objective
To provide a comprehensive life cycle cost report, including abandonment, for the management, engineering,
procurement, installation, testing, pre-commissioning and commissioning of the subsea facilities
Contact with vendors to establish budget estimates as required outside COMPANYs Frame Agreement items
Agree a cost basis with COMPANY
Produce a tabulated cost estimate for CAPEX, OPEX and abandonment costs
Input Requirements
Agreed cost norms

Discussion with vendors as required.
Cost Estimation Basis Report

Field Development Cost Report for subsea equipment and facilities and their installation and pre-commissioning
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1080 Risk and Opportunities
Author :
Objective
To identify risks and opportunities for the project

To investigate risk reduction, mitigation and management measures
Subsea presence at formal project Risk Identification and Assessment Workshop

Input into the Risk Register, as required
Input to Risk reduction and mitigation report as required
Input Requirements
Subsea input to Risk Identification Report

Subsea input to Risk Register
Subsea input to possible risk reduction measures and management of risk
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
1090 IVB Interface and Support
Author :
Objective
To provide an interface with COMPANYs IVB

To provide technical support in response to COMPANYs IVB queries/comments
Provide a technical interface with COMPANYs IVB during the FEED process
Provide technical responses to COMPANYs IVB queries, reviews and comments
Input Requirements
Queries and comments received from COMPANYs IVB
General discussion with COMPANYs IVB

Formal responses to COMPANYs IVB queries/comments
IVB Approval of Subsea FEED Deliverables
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
2010 Basis of Design
Author :
Objective
To assist with updating of the project Basis of Design
Provision of subsea data and change of data as required as the FEED progresses
Input Requirements
Basis of Design updates
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
2020 Project Philosophies
Author :
Objective
To assist with the development of system design and operation philosophies for the project
Provision of subsea input into the various philosophies to be developed as part of the overall FEED
Input Requirements
Fishing Intensity Studies (if available or relevant)

Basis of Design
All party workshops
Operations Philosophy
Materials Selection Philosophy
Corrosion Mitigation Philosophy
Chemical Injection Philosophy
Metering Philosophy
Pigging Philosophy
Protection Philosophy
Installation Philosophy
Pre-commissioning/Commissioning Philosophy
Inspection, Maintenance and Repair (IMR) Philosophy
Future Tie-In Philosophy

CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
2030 Interface Engineering
Author :
Objective
To establish subsea interfaces with other FEED disciplines (process, marine, etc.)
Establish areas where subsea equipment and facilities interface with other aspects of the project, for example, the FPSO,
process equipment and requirements, etc., and define the nature of the interface.
Develop an interface Register defining responsibilities for the interface and data required.
Manage the interfaces through FEED to ensure that up-to-date information is included in the design.
Input Requirements
Review meetings with FPSO Design Team

Attendance at all-party workshops
Attendance at Drilling Interface Management meetings
Interface Register
Interface Definition Sheets
COMPANYs FPSO contractor is likely to be located in the Far East

The interface between Subsea and the FPSO Topsides is very significant, and the subsea FEED contractor and the FPSO
Design Team will need to be aware of this. In particular, the interface applies to CTR Nos. 1050, 2040, 2060, 4010,
4020F to 3020 H, 4020 M, 4060, 4110, 4120, 5110 and 6030
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
2040 Future Expansion
Author :
Objective
To establish the options for future expansion of the development and quantify level of pre-investment.
Investigate the options available for the subsea architecture for future tie-in of wells.
Define potential requirement for new wells and quantify level of pre-investment recommended
Input Requirements
Client sub-surface team
List of pre-investment CAPEX

Input to Future Tie-Back Philosophy (CTR 2020)
Pre-investment included in cost estimate
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
2050 Materials Philosophy
Author :
Objective
To develop materials selection philosophy for the subsea production system, including manifolds, flowlines and risers.
To develop a Corrosion Management System Specification
Definition of potential materials for use within the subsea architecture selected for the development
Demonstration that the materials recommended will be compatible with those of adjacent components and foreseen
operating conditions, and will comply with the system requirements as a whole.
Development of an overall Corrosion Management Specification for the subsea system
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Input to Materials Philosophy document (CTR 2020)

Subsea Corrosion Management System Specification
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
2060 System Definition and Optimisation
Author :
Objective
To define the subsea system for the development as a basis for the remaining phases of FEED.
Development of preliminary system schematics (first draft P&IDs and field layout drawings), showing all main elements
of the subsea system, manifolds, flowlines risers, piping, valves, instruments, etc.
Undertake a peer driven constructability/operability workshop, reviewing the arrangements from installation, operation
and maintenance viewpoints.
Issue field architecture GA drawings and schematics as a basis for the remaining phases of FEED.
Input Requirements
Concept selection documentation and drawings.
Preliminary subsea system P&IDs

Field Layout drawings
Development schematics
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
3010 Subsea Structure Piping Design
Author :
Objective
To develop preliminary designs for manifold and riser base (if required) pipework
Development of piping and equipment layouts for the subsea manifolds, PLETs and riser bases (if required), to include:
- All pipework required
- Tie-in arrangements
- Remote connector type(s)
- Valve requirements, actuation methods and interfaces for ROV intervention
- Controls instrumentation
- Testing and commissioning requirements
From layouts, the development of a piping MTO and weight estimate for each structure as required.
Input Requirements
System definition and P&IDs

System philosophies
2D and 3D CAD drawings

Piping MTOs for all structures
Piping weight estimates for all structures
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
3020 Subsea Structures Structural Design
Author :
Objective
To develop structural designs for manifolds, PLETs and riser bases (if required)
Development of manifold, PLET and riser base (if required) structural layouts, to meet the following criteria:
- Support and protection of the manifold/riser base piping and equipment
- Any protection requirements
- Potential foundations design
- Deployment and installation requirements
- ROV access to operate/override valves
- ROV access to recover/change out key components
From the structural layouts developed, structural steel MTOs and weight estimates will be established for each structure.
Input Requirements
System definition and preliminary P&IDs

System philosophies
2D and 3D CAD drawings

Piping MTOs
Piping weight estimates
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
3030 Subsea Structures Foundations Design
Author :
Objective
To define the most suitable foundation system for the manifold, PLET and riser base (if required) structures.
Development of foundations designs for the subsea structures, including:

- Agree seabed soils data for the preliminary design
- Select optimum foundations system (piles, suction piles, gravity base, etc.)
- Potential foundations design
- Foundations deployment and installation requirements (if applicable)
- ROV access
From the above develop a structural steel MTO and weight estimates for the foundations for each structure.
Input Requirements
Seabed soils information (desktop study or survey information)

Manifold structural and piping designs/layouts
Drawings
Technical note on foundations design for all structures
Foundations MTO and weight estimates for all structures
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4010 Flowline Route Selection
Author :
Objective
To select routes for the infield flowlines required for the development.
A flowline routing study will be performed based on the available data. The routing study will take into consideration the
approaches at the FPSO and manifold ends of the flowlines as well as any known seabed features that will require routing
around. In general, however, the shortest route possible will be selected.
The flowline routes will be used as a basis for the scope of work for the engineering route survey, will be used as the
basis of Field Layout drawings and will provide input to the flow assurance studies (CTR 4020).
Flowline routing shall also take into account pipeline stability, the potential to walk over steep inclines, etc, and avoid
these as necessary
Input Requirements
Admiralty Chart(s) of he DWT area

Any Client supplied information on the area
Route Alignment Sheets

Technical note on route selection
Input to Scope of Work for engineering survey
Input to flow assurance studies
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020A Flow Assurance; Fluids Characterisation
Author :
Objective
To undertake further fluids characterisation studies based on clean DST fluid samples
Analysis of available laboratory report data and selection of fluids for characterisation
Specification of fluid characterisation procedure
Characterisation of fluids
Input Requirements
Fluid analysis reports
Update of fluid characterisation study report
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020B Flow Assurance; Flow Assurance Simulation Basis
Author :
Objective
To develop a flow assurance simulation basis
Review of steady state and dynamic flow assurance work undertaken in pre-FEED
Specification of data requirements
Collation of Data
Identify further data requirements
Detail any assumptions made
Input Requirements
Existing available data
Flow Assurance Simulation Basis Report

Agreement with COMPANY as to the simulation basis
Note: there will be some uncertainty in design. Additional exploration and appraisal drilling in Q2 2011 will provide more
data which may require/cause updates to some of the design cases, and then pre-FEED steady state and dynamic flow
assurance work may require reworking.
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:
Flow Assurance; Steady State Analysis of Further Field Rev :

4020C Extension
Author :
Objective
To complete steady state PIPESIM analysis in the event that the current full field development is expanded.
Review of pre-FEED steady state analysis

Construction of appropriate PIPESIM models
Undertaking the required simulation runs
Results analysis
Production of steady state report
Input Requirements
Existing available data
Extended Steady State Simulation Report
assurance work may require reworking
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020D Flow Assurance; Steady State Life of Field Analysis
Author :
Objective
To complete steady state PIPESIM analysis to confirm system performance through field life

Development of fluid compositions
Undertaking the required simulation runs
Results analysis
Production of Life of Field Report
Input Requirements
Agreed production rates at various stages through field life

Assessment of water cut and gas leaning sensitivities define appropriate fluids sensitivities
Confirmation of line sizing, thermal insulation, etc.

Steady State Life of Field Report
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:
Flow Assurance; Provision of Data for Life of Field Rev :

4020E Corrosion Analysis
Author :
Objective
To provide data for the analysis of corrosion over life of field

Extract appropriate data from the steady state life of field analysis to support life of field corrosion assessment
(temperature, pressure, density and superficial velocity profiles)
Production of Report
Input Requirements
Agreed production rates at various stages through field life

Assessment of water cut and gas leaning sensitivities define appropriate fluids sensitivities
Report
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020F Flow Assurance; OLGA Model Construction and Review
Author :
Objective
To design, construct, review and approve an OLGA model of the DWT system to allow accurate dynamic and transient
analysis
Review of pre-FEED dynamic flow assurance analysis

Design and construct (or update existing model) an OLGA model of the system
Review the OLGA model
Input Requirements
Agreed subsea architecture

Agreed well designs
Construction of a suitable OLGA model

Approval of model for use
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:
Flow Assurance; Transient Operability and Design Rev :

4020G Assessment
Author :
Objective
To perform dynamic and transient analysis of the system to confirm its satisfactory operation
Specification of operating philosophies and sensitivities

Definition of case matrices
Using OLGA model, investigate the following: Unstable flow and minimum hydraulic turndown; Artificial lift performance
(if required); Shutdown; Pipeline pressurisation (line packing); Settle out; Cooldown (no touch) and minimum thermal
turndown; Ramp up; Ramp down; Sphering and benefits of operational pigging; De-pressurisation; Well restart to
depressurised, pressurised and flowing systems; First gas start up; Typical start-up
Analysis of results
Final report
Input Requirements
Operations philosophy
Sensitivities
Report of Transient Operability and Design Assessment
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:
Flow Assurance; Slugging Analysis Rev :

4020H
Author :
Objective
To provide data on potential slug sizes for various potential riser sizes in various flow scenarios
Working in conjunction with the FPSO Design Team, determine the best compromise in terms of FPSO topsides capacity
for managing slugs versus flowline size and wellhead back-pressures later in field life.
Extract liquid surge profiles from the OLGA runs of ramp up and pigging (if applicable) strategies. This is an iterative
process.
Data presentation in report form
Input Requirements
Appropriate OLGA runs
Final Report of Support Data for Slug sizes and recommendations for topsides equipment that is consistent with the FPSO
Design Team conclusions.
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020I Flow Assurance; Data to Support Flowline Design
Author :
Objective
In conjunction with CTRs 4040/J and 4020 K, to provide data in support of flowline design
Extract data from appropriate steady state and dynamic runs in support of flowline design, including, but not limited to:
maximum and minimum steady state and transient wall temperatures; Operating pressure ranges; Full shut-in conditions
for each system
Input Requirements
Appropriate PIPESIM and OLGA runs
In conjunction with CTRs 4040/J and 4020 K, Report of Support Data for Flowline Design
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020J Flow Assurance; Hydrate and Wax Management Studies
Author :
Objective
In conjunction with CTRs 4040/J and 4020 K, to specify and confirm hydrate and wax management strategies,
particularly under transient conditions
Additional OLGA runs as required to consider refined blowdown and liquids displacement strategies
Additional OLGA runs to track hydrate inhibition during restart and wax deposition
Input Requirements
In conjunction with CTRs 4040/J and 4020 K, Report of recommended hydrate and wax management strategies for the
development
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020K Flow Assurance; Hydrate Remediation Assessment
Author :
Objective
In conjunction with CTRs 4040/J and 4020 K, to size the venting system (if provided) for de-pressurisation on either side
of a hydrate blockage, and to develop an operating strategy for the system
Identification of cases for assessment

Construction of OLGA model(s)
OLGA runs
Results analysis
Case Refinement and report on hydrate remediation
Input Requirements
In conjunction with CTRs 4040/J and 4020 K, Report of recommended hydrate remediation strategy
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020L Flow Assurance; Chemical Core and Distribution Sizing
Author :
Objective
To confirm sizing of chemical injection cores in the subsea umbilicals and design of any subsea chemicals distribution
network

Development of fluid compositions
PIPESIM runs
Analysis of results
Report covering above work
Input Requirements
N/A
Report on chemical injection system

Input data for the specifications for subsea umbilicals and umbilical risers
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4020M Flow Assurance; System Finalisation
Author :
Objective
To confirm system performance on completion of design activities
Finalised set of OLGA runs, simulating finalised chemical inhibition dosing and agreed flowline operating strategies. Runs
will be required for: Steady state; ramp up; Ramp down; Pigging; Shutdown, settle out and cooldown; Pipeline
pressurisation; De-pressurisation; First gas and typical start up; Well restart; Hydrate remediation
Analysis of results
Report covering above work
Input Requirements
System design and operating philosophies
Report on finalised system analysis
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4030 Flowline Mechanical Design
Author :
Objective
To undertake flowline mechanical design
Mechanical design of the infield flowlines will be undertaken using verified software to confirm the following:
- Wall thickness
- On-bottom stability
- External coating definition
- CP requirements
- Anode design and attachment
- Upheaval buckling analysis
- Trenching assessment (insulation)
Design shall be sufficient to allow procurement of linepipe in this phase of the development, if required.
Input Requirements
Preliminary flowline sizing (CTR 4020)

Basis of Design
Flowline Mechanical Design Reports for infield flowlines

Drawings as appropriate
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4040 Flowline Coating Design
Author :
Objective
To define optimum external coating system(s) for the flowlines
Selection of the external coating system(s) for flowlines will be undertaken taking into account:
- Anti-corrosion
- Stability
- Insulation requirements
Input Requirements
Flowline mechanical design (CTR 4030)

Flow Assurance studies (CTR 4020)
Flowline Coating Selection Technical Report

Insulation Coating Selection Technical Note
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4050 Flowline and Well Tie-Ins
Author :
Objective
To define systems for flowline and well tie-ins.
Survey available subsea remote flowline connection systems and select most appropriate for DWT development
Undertake system design for tie-ins between
- Flowlines and manifolds
- Wells and manifold
- Flowlines and riser bases (if required)
The stress analysis work for the spool tie-in design shall be based on a likely envelope, and the spool design shall be
adequate to accommodate the potential locations for trees, manifolds and PLETs within that envelope
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Subsea Remote Connection Systems Review Technical Note

Recommended remote connection system
Drawings of potential layouts for well tie-ins and for flowline tie-ins, including preliminary jumper/spoolpiece design.
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4060 Pigging Design
Author :
Objective
To design aspects of the flowline system to suit pre-commissioning and operational pigging requirements.
From the established pigging philosophy

- Ensure that piping design for the manifolds facilitates the installation, use and retrieval of a temporary subsea
PLR for all headers
- Ensure that all tie-in spoolpiece designs are suitable for the safe passage of all types of pig envisaged for use in
pre-commissioning and operational requirements
- Ensure that all other aspects of the subsea flowline systems are suitable for envisaged pigging operations
- Interface with FPSO design to ensure that topsides PLR can be installed for pigging operations envisaged
Input Requirements
Basis of Design (CTR 2010)

Pigging Philosophy (CTR 2020)
Pigging Operations Technical Note

Preliminary pigging procedures
Specification for subsea PLR
Input to design drawings of flowline system components
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4110 Riser System Selection
Author :
Objective
To define the optimal configuration for the DWT riser system
Survey available deep water riser systems, establish pros and cons for each system and select most appropriate system
for the DWT development on both technical and economic bases. Riser systems evaluated will include:
- Flexible Risers
- Steel Catenary Risers
- Multi-bore Hybrid risers
- Single Offset Hybrid Risers
- Concentric Offset Hybrid Risers
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Flow Assurance studies
Field Layout
Operations philosophy
Deep Water Riser Systems Review Technical Note

Recommended riser system
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
4120 Riser System Design
Author :
Objective
Design of the DWT riser system
Based on an appropriate riser system selection, the following design analysis work will be undertaken to define the riser
system
- Configuration design, interfacing with the FPSO contractor for details on FPSO size, layout and RAOs.
- Stress analysis of the risers under expected loads induced by the expected FPSO motions, Metocean conditions
and operational conditions.
- Anchor requirements at base of risers (to isolate the flowlines and/or to maintain configuration and limit
transverse motions).
- Wall thickness definition.
- Preliminary fatigue analysis, including effects of VIV.
- Effects of insulation, if required.
- Flex-joint definition, if required
- Top end motions
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
FPSO layout/RAOs, etc.
Preliminary Riser Design Report
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
5010 Chemical Injection Review and System Definition
Author :
Objective
Definition of the subsea components of the DWT chemical injection system
Review with process engineers the requirements for chemical injection into the DWT system, and the optimum locations
for such injection (e.g. at trees, flowlines or at manifolds, or combinations).
Review possible methods for achieving the chemical injection required, i.e. subsea distribution, etc.
Input into manifold system design and system P&IDs
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Process studies
Information for use in the subsea control system and umbilical studies
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
5110 Subsea Control System (SCS) Definition
Author :
Objective
Review and definition of the SCS
The subsea control system for the DWT development will be a multiplexed electrohydraulic system.
The DWT system philosophies (e.g. operations, availability, reliability, sparing, etc.) will be reviewed to assess the
required performance criteria for the SCS.
The key components of the SCS will be reviewed and defined
Review any new technology that may enhance the SCS or reduce its cost.
Develop a functional design specification for the SCS that will allow procurement to commence on completion of the FEED
phase of the project.
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Field layout
P&IDs
Chemical Injection report
Subsea Control System Preliminary Design Report

SCS Functional Design Specification
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
5210 Subsea Umbilical and Umbilical Riser Definition
Author :
Objective
Review and define requirements for the subsea umbilicals and umbilical riser(s)
Umbilical risers and seabed umbilicals will be required for subsea control, communications and chemical injection supplies
to manifolds and trees.
Review and define requirements for:
- Electrical power transmission
- Electrical or fibre optic signal transmission
- Hydraulic fluid supplies (HP and LP)
- Injection chemical supplies
Compare the use of thermoplastic hose with steel tube cores to supply hydraulic fluids and chemicals for injection.
Consider construction with copper core cables for signal transmission or the use of fibre optic cores.
In collaboration with umbilical supplier(s):
- Establish optimum construction for the seabed umbilicals, complete with proposed cross section.
- Establish optimum construction for the dynamic umbilical risers, complete with proposed cross section, and also
the transition design between dynamic and seabed umbilicals.
- Determine any anchoring/buoyancy requirements for the dynamic umbilical riser section.
- Consider reducing the number of umbilical risers with distribution subsea.
Review any new technology that may enhance the umbilical system or reduce its cost.
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Field layout
P&IDs
Flow assurance studies (CTR 4020/L)
SCS Definition
Subsea Umbilical and Umbilical Riser Preliminary Design Report

Umbilical and Umbilical Riser Specification
Umbilical and Umbilical Riser Data Sheets

CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
5310 Review of Multiphase Flowmeter Systems
Author :
Objective
Review and recommend subsea multiphase flowmeter systems.
Gather and collate data on each of the subsea multiphase flowmeter types available, and review their accuracy, reliability
and cost (CAPEX and OPEX), making technical contact with suppliers as required. Establish track record of use in each
case.
Investigate and compare on technical and cost grounds the options to supply a meter and flow control valves at the
manifold or to provide a meter per well.
Produce a Specification and data sheet for the recommended multiphase flowmeter
Input Requirements
Metering philosophy
Operating philosophy
Vendor information packs
Subsea Multiphase Flowmeter Review Technical Note

Subsea Multiphase Flowmeter Specification
Subsea Multiphase Flowmeter Data Sheet
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
5320 Review of Sand Detection Systems
Author :
Objective
Review and recommend subsea sand detection systems.
Gather and collate data on the sand detection systems available (both intrusive and non-intrusive to the production
system). Review and compare the systems, their accuracy, reliability and cost (CAPEX and OPEX), making technical
contact with suppliers as required, and make recommendations for the DWT project.
Develop specification and data sheet for the recommended sand detection system
Input Requirements
Basis of Design
Operating philosophy
Vendor information packs
Sand Detection Systems Review Technical Note

Sand Detector System Specification
Sand Detection System Data Sheet
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
6010 Survey Specification and Scope of Work
Author :
Objective
To provide a Specification and Scope of Work for engineering survey of the DWT seabed for detailed design purposes.
For detailed design of the DWT subsea facilities to proceed it will be necessary to provide data as to the nature of the
seabed in the area to allow various engineering and design tasks to proceed. The survey specification shall include, but
not be limited to:
- Applicable codes and standards
- Mobilisation and acceptance trials
- Survey vessel requirements
- Survey equipment requirements
- Sampling and in-situ testing requirements
- Data collection and on-board processing
- Interpretation and charting
- Reporting and Documentation requirements
The survey scope of work will include, but may not be limited to, the following:
- Route survey for each infield flowline and umbilical corridor, specifying corridor route, expected termination
locations, survey width and number of passes, PCT test requirements and separation, etc.
- Boreholes to establish details of soils and soils strength for locations where seabed structures will be required,
i.e. the three manifold locations, any location where there may be a riser base or riser anchor.
- Requirements for survey for the FPSO will also be included from the FPSO contractor.
Input Requirements
Field layouts
Expected locations for subsea structures and FPSO
Preliminary flowline routes
Survey Specification
Survey Scope of Work
Survey Corridor Drawings

CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
6020 Subsea System Functional Design Specification
Author :
Objective
To prepare a Functional Design Specification for the DWT subsea system
The purpose of the document will be to summarise all functional requirements for the subsea facilities based on the FEED
work completed, and to compliment the BOD. Cross reference will be made within this document to other key reports and
specifications generated by the FEED study.
Input Requirements
BOD
Project philosophies
Field layout drawings
Subsea P&IDs
Subsea System Functional Design Specification
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:
Flowline and Flowline Related Procurement, Fabrication Rev :

6030 and Installation Specifications
Author :
Objective
To prepare a full suite of specifications for procurement, fabrication and installation of the subsea flowline and related
facilities for inclusion in the ITT for the next phase of the project.
Prepare Specifications covering the procurement, fabrication and installation of subsea flowlines and flowlines related
equipment
Input Requirements
BOD
Field layout drawings
Subsea P&IDs
Materials selection
Etc.
Specifications covering Procurement, Fabrication and Installation of the Subsea FlowlineFacilities
Specifications for the flowlines and flowline related equipment required have been listed in the Scope of Work for the
Subsea FEED. Depending on the FEED outcome, these may vary. Certain specifications are covered under specific
equipment CTRs.
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
6040 Subsea Structures and Structure Related Procurement ,
Fabrication and Installation Specifications Author :
Objective
To prepare functional specifications for the subsea manifolds, PLETs and riser bases (if required) for tenderers for the
next phase of the project
Prepare Specifications covering the procurement, fabrication and installation of subsea manifolds, PLETs and riser bases
(if required) and any structure related related equipment
Input Requirements
BOD
Subsea P&IDs
Manifold 2D and 3D drawings
Pipework schematics
MTOs
Manifold Design Specification
Specifications for the subsea structures and structure related equipment required have been listed in the Scope of Work
for the Subsea FEED. The functional specification for the manifold(s), PLETs and riser bases (if required) will be prepared
in conjunction with the 2D and 3D CAD drawings, the MTOs and pipework schematics developed in FEED. Certain
Specifications (e.g. structure fabrication) will cover all structures.
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
6110 Scopes of Work for EPC/EPIC/Installation Contracts
Author :
Objective
To provide assistance as necessary to determine a contracting strategy for the next phase of the project.
To prepare Scopes of Work for the enquiry packages for the contracts to be let for the next phase of the work.
Assistance will be provided as necessary to develop a contracting strategy for the project, for example, EPC, EPIC, EPCIC
or installation.
As a result of the decision on contracting strategy, Scopes of Work will be developed for each of the contracts that will be
tendered. These Scopes of Work will be taken forward, together with other technical deliverables developed during FEED,
into The ITT packages.
Input Requirements
Contracting strategy
Subsea system architecture details
Scopes of Work for ITT packages
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
7010 Subsea Support to HSE - General
Author :
Objective
Subsea contributions to project HSE in general
Assistance will be provided as necessary for the following:

- Contractual obligations for HSE
- Safety Engineering Design Philosophy
- Project HSE Plan
- Project Safety Register
- Development and Upkeep of Safety Action Management System (SAMS)
Input Requirements
Report on HSE obligations

Philosophy documents
Project HSE Plan
Project Safety Register
SAMS
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
7020 Safety Engineering
Author :
Objective
Subsea contributions to project safety engineering tasks
Assistance/attendance will be provided as necessary for the following:

- Formal HAZID Workshop
- Formal HAZOP Workshop
- Loss control design
- Hazardous material inventory
-
Input Requirements
HAZID Report
HAZOP Report
HAZOP Action List Responses
Design Report
Hazardous Materials List
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
CONTRACTOR:

Rev :
7030 Environmental Engineering
Author :
Objective
Subsea contributions to project environmental engineering tasks
Assistance/attendance will be provided as necessary for the following:

- Environmental studies
- Formal ENVID Workshop
- Environmental protection philosophy
- Environmental emissions and discharges estimations and database
Input Requirements
Environmental study technical note

ENVID report
Philosophy document
Emissions/Discharges database
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .
CTR FORM
Name: . Name: .
Date: . Date: .

CTR Pack

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

CTR Pack

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

CTR FORM

COST TIME & RESOURCE

PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :

CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited

Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :

CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Subsea FEED team management

Notes, Assumptions, etc

Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :

Signature: .. Signature: ...

Signature: .. Signature: ...

PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :

CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited

Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :

CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Quality Assurance for the Subsea FEED

Subsea FEED QA Manual

Notes, Assumptions, etc

Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :

Signature: .. Signature: ...

Signature: .. Signature: ...

PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :

CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited

Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :

CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Management of Project Documents

Produce Subsea FEED Document Control Manual

Key deliverable dates

Master Document Register (MDR)

Notes, Assumptions, etc

Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :

Signature: .. Signature: ...

Signature: .. Signature: ...

PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :

CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited

Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :

CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Define sparing and redundancy philosophy for subsea facilities

Client supplied reliability data

Report on FMECA studies

Notes, Assumptions, etc

Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :

Signature: .. Signature: ...

Signature: .. Signature: ...

PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :

CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited

Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :

CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Planning services to the overall project plan

Information from procurement support (CTR 1060)

Level 2 schedule for post-FEED activities

Notes, Assumptions, etc

Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :

Signature: .. Signature: ...

Signature: .. Signature: ...

PROJECT : DWT Subsea FEED CONTRACT No.: WORK ORDER Nr. :

CUSTOMER : Tullow Ghana Limited

Planned Start: Planned Finish : Duration :

CTR/Activity No : Title : Date :

Definition of subsea facilities and equipment required

Subsea Long Lead Items (LLI) List

Notes, Assumptions, etc

Prepared By (Lead): Checked By :