Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press and American Academy of Religion are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to Journal of the American Academy of Religion.
http://www.jstor.org
Introduction
FOREIGNINVESTIGATORS
Sin, as a religiousconcept, has not receiveda systematicstudyamong scholars
of AfricanTraditionalReligion. Some of them who mentionedsin in theirwriting
did so justby the way and claimedeitherthat the Africanshad no notion of sin or
that they had very poor concept of it. Let us examine some of these scholarsand
what they said about sin.
J. K. Parratt writing about the Yoruba said, "the sense of sin among the
Yoruba,if any, is nothingcomparablewith the developedethicalconceptionof sin
which is to be found in both the Old Testamentand the New Testament."'
Parrattseems to overlook the fact that comparisoncan often be odious; and
that in mattersrelatingto religion,comparisonbecomesmore delicatebecauseif
one attemptinga comparativestudy is not careful, that which is supposed to be
comparativereligionmaydegenerateinto competitivereligion.If Parrattand men
like him had tried to make a little bit of effort to suppress their preconceived
notion and prejudiceand had endeavoredto makea thoroughand unbiasedstudy
of the concept of sin among the Yoruba and other African ethnic groups, they
would have been persuadedthat these Africansare as conscious of sin as the Jews
of the Old Testamentwith whom Parrattwas tryingto comparethe Yoruba. We
shall attempt in this paper to show that Africans have a deep sense of sin and
"know the distinction between ritual errors which are calculated to be offences
againstthe divinities,derelictionsof filial dutieswhichmay arousethe angerof the
aggrievedancestors, and the breach of Deity's behests which is purely a moral
issue. . . Sometimes,of course, it is not easy to drawthe line betweenthe merely
ritual and the purely ethical, as they are often involved one in the other."2
Basden,writingabout the Ibo, said in one breaththat "Certainactions suchas
murder,theft, and adulteryare esteemedoffencesagainst God, as well as against
man;"and in anotherbreathadded that "inspite of this theoreticalknowledgeof
good and evil, there is little compunction in committing theft, murderand other
misdemeanours.The lureof a title leadsa man to steal in orderto acquireit."3This
latterassertionmade by Basdenis tantamountto saying that the Ibo are ignorant
of the gravity and repercussionof sin, and this runs counter to his (Basden's)
former statement - namely, that "murder,theft and adultery are esteemed
offences against God, as well as against man." But Arinze, a well-readIbo man
who has studied the religion of his people, maintainsthat "an Ibo man believes
that when he sins, he makes the high power frown."4
A. B. Ellis, discussingthe sense of sin and morality among the Twi-speaking
people of the Gold Coast (now Ghana), wronglyassertedthat "religionis not in
any way allied with moral ideas"and that the two only come together"whenman
attains a higherdegreeof civilization."He claimedthat "amongthe people of the
Gold Coast sin is limited to insults offered to the gods, and neglect of the gods.
Murder,theft, and all offencesagainst the person or againstproperty,arematters
in which the gods have no immediateconcernand in which they have no interest.
'J. K. Parratt, "Religious Change in Yoruba Society," Journal of Religion in Africa, vol. 2,
1969, p. 118.
2D. Bolaji Idowu, Alodumare: God in Yoruba Belief (London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Ltd., 1962), p. 148.
3G. T. Basden, Among the Ibos of Nigeria (London: Frank Cass, 1966), pp. 216-17.
4FrancisA. Arinze, Sacrifice in Ibo Religion (Ibadan: Ibadan University Press, 1970), p. 34.
Themostatrociouscrimes,committedasbetweenmanandmanthegodscanview
withequanimity."5
Thisis not a truerepresentation of thesenseof sin amongthesepeople.Ellis
got himselfinto this muddlebecauseof his prejudices.He assumedthat "the
deitiesarenot,properlyspeaking,whatwe shouldtermsupernatural agents.The
conceptionof a deity formedby uncivilizedracesis verydifferentfromthat
formedby higherraces.A deityis with theminvariablya partof nature.It is
superhuman, butnot superriatural.Theconceptionof the latterbelongsto a far
higherstage of mental developmentthanthat whichthe Tshi-speaking peoples
haveattained."6
From his pronouncements we know that Ellis was one of the men who
attemptedto put moralityand religionin watertightcompartments.Many
historiansof religionagreethatthereis a kindof connectionbetweenthetwo."We
are assured,"declaredJ. EstlinCarpenter, "thatthe historicalbeginningof all
moralityis to be foundin religion;or thatintheearliestperiodof humanhistory,
religionandmoralitywerenecessarycorrelatesof eachother.7RobertsonSmith
cautiouslyaffirmsthat "in ancientsocietyall morality,as moralitywas then
understood, wasconsecrated andenforcedby religiousmotivesandsanctions."8
It is hearteningto note that in his 1949editionof WestAfricanReligion,
Parrinder statedthat"themoralityof WestAfricais entwinedwithreligion,for
the peopleundoubtedly havea senseof sin.Theirlifeis not overshadowed witha
constantfeelingof sinfulness,however;the African'shappydispositionis well
known.If a manbreaksa taboo,he expectsthe supernatural penaltyto follow,
andhisfriendswilldeserthim,orevenpunishhimfurther.. . Iflightningstrikesa
manor a house,he is judgedat onceto be an evildoer,withoutquestion,forhe
musthaveoffendedthegods. . ."9But,in subsequent editionsof thesamebook,
Parrinder expunged thisstatement.Why he did so, he aloneis inthebestposition
to tell.
AnotherWest Africanobserver,MajorLeonard,who studiedthe ethnic
groupson the LowerNiger,describedreligionas intermingled withthe whole
socialsystemof the people."Thereligionof thesenatives,"he declared,"istheir
existence,and theirexistenceis theirreligion.It suppliesthe principleon which
theirlawis dispensedandmoralityadjudicated. Theentireorganisationof their
commonlife is so interwovenwith it that they cannotget awayfrom it. Like
Hindus,theyeat religiously,drinkreligiously,and sin religiously."'0
Similarly,JakobSpieth,a Germanmissionary,pointedout that "amongthe
Ewe-speaking folk,notonlydoesMotherEarthpunishwithdeaththosewhohave
swornfalsely,but Mawu,God,whoknowsthethoughtsandheartsof men,whois
thegiverof everything good uponearth. . .willnotallowonebrotherto deceive
another,or to sufferthe king to judge unrighteously,or permitone to burn
another'shousedown.""
Morality,as depicted here among the Ewe, is definitely more than
5A. B. Ellis, The Tshi-Speaking Peoples of the Gold Coast (London: Frank Cass, 1894,
reprinted 1966), pp. 10-11.
61bid.,p. 19.
7J. Estlin Carpenter, Comparative Religion (London: William Norgate, n. d.), p. 196.
XW. Robertson Smith, The Religion of the Semites (London: A & C Black, 1914), p. 267.
9E. G. Parrinder, West African Religion, Ist ed. (London: Epworth Press, 1949), p. 199.
'0A. G. Leonard, The Lower Niger and Its Tribes (London: Macmillan, 1906), p. 429.
"Jacob Spieth quoted by J. Estlin Carpenter in Comparative Religion, pp. 197-98.
rudimentary;the justice of man is put under the guardianshipof God who is the
righteous Judge.
One cannot but be impressedby Westermannin his assessmentof the senseof
sin and the removal of evil among Africans. He claimedthat "theAfricansknow
about sin and evil, theirconfession and their removal. . . On the Gold Coast,the
evil or sin is expelledfrom a town before the new harvestis allowed to be brought
into it." He furtherpointed out that "themanytaboos whicha man has to observe
are not to be regardedas things mechanicalwhichdo not touch the heart,but that
the avoidance is a sacred law respectedby the community. In breaking it, you
offend a divine power."'2
Westermann'sstatementis very importanthere for our understandingof the
concept of sin among Africans. Contraryto the wrong notion of some foreign
investigators that Africans have no sense of morality and no sense of sin,
Westermannimpliedin his statementthatAfricanstenaciouslyhold the beliefthat
moral values are based upon the recognitionof the divine will and that sin in the
community must be expelled if perfect peace is to be enjoyed.
BASISFORPOSTULATING
SIN IN AFRICANTRADITIONALRELIGION
We indicatedin the introductionto this paperthat Africansbelievethat this is
God'sworld and that He has broughtinto beingdivinitiesand spiritsas well as the
ancestral spirits for the orderly government of the universe. God and His
functionaries are interested in the moment-to-moment behavior of men and
women and have laid down guiding principlesfor humanbehaviorin the society.
Man is able to respond to Deity's behests because he is created a moral agent
endowed with conscienceand capable of distinguishingbetweengood and evil.
Man, as conceivedby Africans,is createdin a being-in-relation- in relation
to God his Creatorand his fellow men. We agreewith Westermannwhen he said,
"Africansociety is characterizedby the prevalence,of the idea of the community.
The whole existence from birth to death is organicallyembodied in a series of
associations,and life appearsto have its full value only in those close ties." 3These
ties will includeextendedmembersof the family, the clan and village, the various
societies and organizationsin the communitytogetherwith the close ties with the
ancestors who are interestedin the day-to-day life of their living children. It is
indeed an ethical system.
In this ethical systemof the Africans,covenant plays a very importantrole. In
fact the whole of person-to-personand person-to-divinityrelationshipsare based
upon one type of covenant or another. We have both the parity covenant (when
the agreement is sealed between persons of equal rank) and the suzerainty
covenant(whenthe agreementis sealedbetweena personor beingin authorityand
his subjects). The parity covenant takes different forms. It may involve simple
sharingof a meal or a more elaborateform like ceremoniallysuckingeach other's
blood or drinkingtogethersome concoctionfrom a specialreceptacle,or swearing
beforeand in the name of a divinitywho acts as a witness.The suzeraintycovenant
is the type that takes place when an African becomes a devotee of a particular
divinity. Such a devotee must observe all the taboos that such an acceptance
12D.Westermann, Africa and Christianity (London: Oxford University Press, 1937), pp. 96-
97.
13D. Westermann, The African Today and Tomorrow (London: International African
Institute, 1949), p. 65.
Oludumarewho judges men purely for what they are; that is in consequenceof
their character."20
At this stage, let us turn our attentionto examiningwhat Africansthink of the
consequencesof sin in African Traditional Religion.
CONSEQUENCESOF SIN
All over Africathereare mythsindicatingthat therewas once a kindof
"GoldenAge"(somethingof the Gardenof Eden)wheneverything wasbeautiful
and peacefuland when therewas a close link betweenheavenand earthand
betweenGodandman - a "goldenage"whenmancouldgo to Godin heaven
andreturnto earthas hewished,andwhenhe didnotneedto workbeforehehad
his dailybreadsuppliedby the SupremeBeing.Butthen,somethinghappened
whichmadeGodwithdrawfrom-man. Thatwhichhappenedis putin theformof
myths.
One versionsays that God'sdwellingplace(theheavens)was veryclose to
earth,so closethatwhena womanwaspoundingyam,sheconstantlyknockedthe
tip of herpestleagainstthe "faceof God."Anyattemptto discourageherfrom
liftingthe pestletoo highprovedabortive.So, Godwithdrew.
Anotherversionclaimsthat thesky,in pristinetime,usedto supplyfood to
mankind.Allthata personneeddo wasto stretchhishandto reachtheheavenfor
asmuchfoodashewanteddaily,butnomore.Somegreedypeopledecidedto take
morethantheycouldmanage.Thisdisobedienceand greedinesson the partof
manannoyedGodand so He withdrew.
Yetanotherversionsaysthatwomenwereparticularly quarrelsome, andall
effortsmadebyGodto askthemto stopquarrelling andto livepeacefullyproveda
failure.HenceHe withdrew.
One legendamongthe Ibo of Nigeriasays that "it is the increasein crime
among men that ended the happycompanyof the good old days and also
shortenedman'stermon earth."21
Fromthedifferentversionsof the mythrelatingto the withdrawal of God,it
wouldseemthatAfricansholdtheviewthata happylifeis oneinwhichmankeeps
in close touchwith God - a life in whichGod "tabernacles" withthe people.
Thereis, also, the suggestionthatmanis capableof respondingto Godandof
keepingin close touchwith God becausehe wascreatedresponsible; and that
contraryto allexpectation,manpushedGodawaybyhismisdemeanor, mainlyby
doingwhatGodforbadehim.Whatmanis saidto havedoneto irritateGodvaries
fromone ethnicgroupto another.Butthe basicfactremainsthe same,namely,
that man did somethingcontraryto the directionsof God, and that his
misdemeanor contributedlargelyto the disruptionof the relationthathitherto
existedbetweenhimand God. The wholeepisodeis symbolic.
Wehaveindicatedthatmanhassomerelationship to Godandrelationship to
his fellow-men.Both relationshipsare to be maintainedbecauseit is in the
maintenance of thetwothatmanhaspeaceandhappiness.Inbothcases,Godand
His functionaries(divinitiesand ancestors)arethejudges. In otherwords,man-to-
man relationshipis as great a concern to God as man-to-God relationshipis to
Him.
From the myth of the withdrawalof God, we deduce that man'sdisobedience
20E.Bolaji Idowu, Olodumare: God, p. 149.
21E.A. Arinze, Sacrifice in, p. 12.
isolated him from God and disrupted his total well-being; "it brought
disadvantageousand tragic consequences to men: God left men alone, death
came, and man lost happiness,peace and the free supply of food.'"22For a man to
miss God's fellowship and guidance is to incur God's displeasureand to bring
misfortune, pain and death upon himself. It is necessary to emphasize the
connection betweensin and punishment.This is aptly put by G. Wagner,whenhe
said,
Thus,amongtheVugusu,Godis saidto punisha womanforcommitting adultery
bylettingherpreviouschildrendie. Hewillthenappearto herina dreamandsay:
'I havegivenyouthesechildrenfromyourhusband.Whyhaveyou lefthimand
joinedanotherthigh?Now I shalltakethesechildrenbackto me."'23
God is herepresentedas benevolent Fatherwho also would punish his childrenif
they acted contraryto His directives.Among the Nuer, "Asicknessmay alwaysbe
a sign of some fault. . . Nuer think that a man would not be sick if therehad been
no error. . ."24 And the Lugbara people hold the belief that "sin temporarily
destroys the ideal relationship between living and dead kin and persistent sin
causes sterility."25
Among the Yoruba, thereis the strong belief that sin bringsdisasterupon the
evil doer who eventually dies a bad death. To die a bad death, accordingto the
people, is for the sinner to be singled out by anti-wickednessdivinities (e.g.,
Aiyelala, Sango and Soponno), scourged with terrible disease and killed. The
death of such sinnersis nevermourned;the corpsesaretreatedshabbilyand taken
to the bad bush. No one praysto have such a spirit reincarnatein the family, and
no one invokes the spirit of such an ancestor during worship at the ancestral
shrine.26
What is being emphasizedat this point is that Africansknow the essence of
being in good relationshipto God and to theirfellow men and are convincedthat
sin destroysgood relationship,that it upsets the equilibriumof the society, that it
drives a wedge between man and the supersensibleworld and that it brings
suffering,pain and death to man.
Since they are aware of the terribleconsequencesof sin, Africansdo all they
can to please God and His functionariesand to abideby the norm of the societyin
whichthey live. Butwhenthey know that they have violatedany of the norms,they
do not look or feel unconcerned,but they attemptto removethe stain and blemish
which sin impressesupon them as individualsor as a community.
REMOVAL OF SIN
the offenders(if they are still living)or theirrelations.In the midstof ritual
drummingof the bata(specialSangodrum),singingandecstaticmovementsby
the priests,the meteoricstones,believedto be hauledby Sango,aresearchedfor
anddugoutof theearth.Thesacrificial ramis immolated, andthebloodis poured
in theaffectedarea.Plentyof oil is pouredalsoto calmtheangerof thedivinity.
Thebeliefis thatuntilthe riteis performed,the wholeareauponwhichSango
descendedis declaredout of boundsto peoplebecauseit is sacred.A violationof
the taboowillresultin death.Hencethe commonsayingamongthe Yorubo-
"BiSangobaw6ni'le,onilea wol'agbede". If Sangodescendsupona building,the
inhabitants haveto procureanalternative accomodation ina smithy.Butoncethe
propitiatory sacrificeis performed,it is believedthatsin is removedandpeaceis
restored.
Althoughsin can be and is punishedby eitherthe divinitiesor the ancestors,we
must realize that Africans believe that such sins are still regardedas offenses
against God who is the Creatorand Sustainerof the universeand its inhabitants,
who expects His creaturesto maintain good relationshipwith one another and
with the supersensibleworld and on whose behalf the divinities and ancestors
punish immoraldeeds.