Marking Scheme for H83DPX Design Project

Topic
Group
Lead Engineer

Category Excellent ( 8-10) Good (6-7)

Almost all energy inputs and outputs have been

All energy inputs and outputs have been
considered, including some indirect ones, and
considered, including indirect ones, and assembled
Energy audit assembled into a reader-friendly summary. The
into a reader-friendly summary. The discussion
discussion explains most choices of energy
explains the choices of energy forms used
forms used

Excellent data extraction and interpretation, perfect
use of targeting and design tools to synthesise
Energy recovery systems with
heat recovery systems. PFD is modified to
process integration
completely incorporate all heat recovery
opportunities, including HEN where appropriate
Good data extration and interpretation, good
use of targeting and design tools to synthesise
heat recovery systems. Good attempt at
modifications to the PFD to incorporate heat
recovery, with HEN elements if appropriate

Largely complete appreciation of the utilities

Design ans optimisation of utility
systems
Full appreciation of the utilities provisions for the
provisions for the heating and cooling needs,
heating an cooling needs, and exemplarily
and attempted optimisation of their use
conducted optimisation of their use selecting the
selecting an appropriate method for the
most appropriate method for the process
process

Comments:
Okay (4-5) Poor (<4) Marks Weight Total

There are some notable omissions in the energy

inputs and outputs. The summary could have been There grave omissions in the energy inputs and outputs.
improved and made more reade-friendly. The The summary is not reade-friendly. The discussion does 0.3 0
discussion does not explain some important choices of not explain important choices of energy forms used
energy forms used

Reasonable use of data and targeting tools to identify

No identification of energy recovery targets, and no
energy recovery targets. No or little modifications to 0.4 0
changes to PFD
PFD.

Utility system design is attempted, but with either an

No planning/design of the utility system. 0.3 0
inappropriate or without a systematic approach.

0
overall mark / 100