History of The Internet

Stan J.
Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 20, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography
Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for
an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons,
most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a
victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005.
I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out
assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts
of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due
process; thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed
energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal
action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy.
The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with
the same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I
have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and
confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the
numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on
the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment,
threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants
or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of
justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S.
Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized
and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I
am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography Page 1 of 6 Wednesday, April 20, 2016
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster
Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim
Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will
provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and
assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured,
and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy
weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented
the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and
the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton
Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures.
I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning
and the performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in
it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District
Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference
of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal
and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South
Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was
solicited by ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of
RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also
proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster
Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under
construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to
People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and numerous others.
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those
creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the
AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company
wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that
lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects
of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K
symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator
William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities.
The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based
real time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees
some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human
resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and
negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since
it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County
demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans
it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an
increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which
was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give
specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical,
and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State
Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled
to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with
scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services
and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology
(NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the
Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore
Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R,
Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a
major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for
the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had
arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly.
We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula
of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was
released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both
debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements,
and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High
Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We
were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had
financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services,
tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one
year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the
other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4
million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments.
(See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team
scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the
camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for
teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa
Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues
most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino
was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players
Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp,
while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article
about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants,
with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a
professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video.
The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked
forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future
of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr.
Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors.
That concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
History of the Internet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet
Published by Stan J. Caterbone and Global Entertainment Group, Ltd, founded in 1987
History of the Internet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The history of the Internet begins with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. Initial concepts of packet networking
originated in several computer science laboratories in the United States, United Kingdom, and France.[1] The US Department of Defense
awarded contracts as early as the 1960s for packet network systems, including the development of the ARPANET (which would become the
first network to use the Internet Protocol). The first message was sent over the ARPANET from computer science Professor Leonard
Kleinrock's laboratory at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) to the second network node at Stanford Research Institute (SRI).
Packet switching networks such as ARPANET, NPL network, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the
late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of communications protocols.[2] Donald Davies first designed a packet-switched network at the
National Physics Laboratory in the UK, which became a testbed for UK research for almost two decades.[3][4] The ARPANET project led to
the development of protocols for internetworking, in which multiple separate networks could be joined into a network of networks.
Access to the ARPANET was expanded in 1981 when the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the Computer Science Network
(CSNET). In 1982, the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP) was introduced as the standard networking protocol on the ARPANET. In the early
1980s the NSF funded the establishment for national supercomputing centers at several universities, and provided interconnectivity in 1986
with the NSFNET project, which also created network access to the supercomputer sites in the United States from research and education
organizations. Commercial Internet service providers (ISPs) began to emerge in the very late 1980s. The ARPANET was decommissioned
in 1990. Limited private connections to parts of the Internet by officially commercial entities emerged in several American cities by late
1989 and 1990,[5] and the NSFNET was decommissioned in 1995, removing the last restrictions on the use of the Internet to carry
commercial traffic.
In the 1980s, research at CERN in Switzerland by British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee resulted in the World Wide Web, linking
hypertext documents into an information system, accessible from any node on the network.[6] Since the mid-1990s, the Internet has had a
revolutionary impact on culture, commerce, and technology, including the rise of near-instant communication by electronic mail, instant
messaging, voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone calls, two-way interactive video calls, and the World Wide Web with its
discussion forums, blogs, social networking, and online shopping sites. The research and education community continues to develop and
use advanced networks such as NSF's very high speed Backbone Network Service (vBNS), Internet2, and National LambdaRail. Increasing
amounts of data are transmitted at higher and higher speeds over fiber optic networks operating at 1-Gbit/s, 10-Gbit/s, or more. The
Internet's takeover of the global communication landscape was almost instant in historical terms: it only communicated 1% of the
information flowing through two-way telecommunications networks in the year 1993, already 51% by 2000, and more than 97% of the
telecommunicated information by 2007.[7] Today the Internet continues to grow, driven by ever greater amounts of online information,
commerce, entertainment, and social networking.
Internet history timeline

Contents
Early research and
1 Precursors development:
2 Development of wide-area networking
1966: Merit Network
2.1 Inspiration
founded
2.2 Development of packet switching
1966: ARPANET
2.3 Networks that led to the Internet
planning starts
2.3.1 ARPANET
1969: ARPANET carries
2.3.2 NPL
its first packets
2.3.3 Merit Network
1970: Mark I network at
2.3.4 CYCLADES
NPL (UK)
2.3.5 X.25 and public data networks
1970: Network
2.3.6 UUCP and Usenet
Information Center
2.4 Merging the networks and creating the Internet (197395)
(NIC)
2.4.1 TCP/IP
1971: Merit Network's
2.4.2 From ARPANET to NSFNET
packet-switched network
2.4.3 Transition towards the Internet
operational
2.5 TCP/IP goes global (1980s)
1971: Tymnet packet-
2.5.1 CERN, the European Internet, the link to the Pacific and beyond
switched network
2.5.2 The early global "digital divide" emerges
1972: Internet Assigned
2.5.2.1 Africa
Numbers Authority
2.5.2.2 Asia and Oceania
History of the Internet and DARPA Page 1 of 29 Thursday August 25, 2016
1 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
2.5.2.3 Latin America (IANA) established
2.6 Rise of the global Internet (late 1980s/early 1990s onward) 1973: CYCLADES
2.6.1 World Wide Web and introduction of browsers network demonstrated
2.6.2 Use in wider society 1990s to early 2000s (Web 1.0) 1974: Telenet packet-
2.6.3 Web 2.0 switched network
2.6.4 The mobile revolution 1976: X.25 protocol
2.7 Networking in outer space approved
3 Internet governance 1978: Minitel introduced
3.1 NIC, InterNIC, IANA and ICANN 1979: Internet Activities
3.2 Internet Engineering Task Force Board (IAB)
3.2.1 Request for Comments 1980: USENET news
3.3 The Internet Society using UUCP
3.4 Globalization and Internet governance in the 21st century 1980: Ethernet standard
4 Politicization of the Internet introduced
4.1 Net neutrality 1981: BITNET
5 Use and culture established
5.1 Email and Usenet
5.2 From Gopher to the WWW Merging the networks and
5.3 Search engines creating the Internet:
5.4 File sharing
5.5 Dot-com bubble 1981: Computer Science
5.6 Mobile phones and the Internet Network (CSNET)
6 Web technologies 1982: TCP/IP protocol
7 Historiography suite formalized
8 See also 1982: Simple Mail
9 References Transfer Protocol
10 Further reading (SMTP)
11 External links 1983: Domain Name
System (DNS)
1983: MILNET split off
from ARPANET
Precursors 1985: First .COM
domain name registered
The concept of data communication transmitting data between two different places through an 1986: NSFNET with 56
electromagnetic medium such as radio or an electric wire predates the introduction of the first kbit/s links
computers. Such communication systems were typically limited to point to point communication 1986: Internet
between two end devices. Telegraph systems and telex machines can be considered early precursors of Engineering Task Force
this kind of communication. The Telegraph in the late 19th century was the first fully digital (IETF)
communication system. 1987: UUNET founded
1988: NSFNET
Fundamental theoretical work in data transmission and information theory was developed by Claude
upgraded to 1.5 Mbit/s
Shannon, Harry Nyquist, and Ralph Hartley in the early 20th century.
(T1)
Early computers had a central processing unit and remote terminals. As the technology evolved, new 1988: OSI Reference
systems were devised to allow communication over longer distances (for terminals) or with higher Model released
speed (for interconnection of local devices) that were necessary for the mainframe computer model. 1988: Morris worm
These technologies made it possible to exchange data (such as files) between remote computers. 1989: Border Gateway
However, the point-to-point communication model was limited, as it did not allow for direct Protocol (BGP)
communication between any two arbitrary systems; a physical link was necessary. The technology was 1989: PSINet founded,
also considered unsafe for strategic and military use because there were no alternative paths for the allows commercial
communication in case of an enemy attack. traffic
1989: Federal Internet
Development of wide-area networking Exchanges (FIXes)
1990: GOSIP (without
With limited exceptions, the earliest computers were connected directly to terminals used by individual TCP/IP)
users, typically in the same building or site. Such networks became known as local-area networks 1990: ARPANET
(LANs). Networking beyond this scope, known as wide-area networks (WANs), emerged during the decommissioned
1950s and became established during the 1960s. 1990: Advanced
Network and Services
Inspiration (ANS)
2 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
J. C. R. Licklider, Vice President at Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., proposed a global network in his
1990: UUNET/Alternet
January 1960 paper Man-Computer Symbiosis:[8] allows commercial
traffic
A network of such [computers], connected to one another by wide-band communication 1990: Archie search
lines [which provided] the functions of present-day libraries together with anticipated engine
advances in information storage and retrieval and [other] symbiotic functions 1991: Wide area
information server
(WAIS)
In August 1962, Licklider and Welden Clark published the paper "On-Line Man-Computer 1991: Gopher
Communication"[9] which was one of the first descriptions of a networked future. 1991: Commercial
Internet eXchange (CIX)
In October 1962, Licklider was hired by Jack Ruina as director of the newly established Information
1991: ANS CO+RE
Processing Techniques Office (IPTO) within DARPA, with a mandate to interconnect the United States
allows commercial
Department of Defense's main computers at Cheyenne Mountain, the Pentagon, and SAC HQ. There he
traffic
formed an informal group within DARPA to further computer research. He began by writing memos
describing a distributed network to the IPTO staff, whom he called "Members and Affiliates of the 1991: World Wide Web
(WWW)
Intergalactic Computer Network".[10] As part of the information processing office's role, three network
1992: NSFNET
terminals had been installed: one for System Development Corporation in Santa Monica, one for
upgraded to 45 Mbit/s
Project Genie at University of California, Berkeley, and one for the Compatible Time-Sharing System
project at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Licklider's identified need for inter-networking (T3)
would become obvious by the apparent waste of resources this caused. 1992: Internet Society
(ISOC) established
1993: Classless Inter-
For each of these three terminals, I had three different sets of user commands. So if I was Domain Routing (CIDR)
talking online with someone at S.D.C. and I wanted to talk to someone I knew at Berkeley 1993: InterNIC
or M.I.T. about this, I had to get up from the S.D.C. terminal, go over and log into the established
other terminal and get in touch with them.... 1993: Mosaic web
browser released
I said, oh man, it's obvious what to do: If you have these three terminals, there ought to be 1994: Full text web
one terminal that goes anywhere you want to go where you have interactive computing. search engines
That idea is the ARPAnet.[11] 1994: North American
Network Operators'
Although he left the IPTO in 1964, five years before the ARPANET went live, it was his vision of Group (NANOG)
universal networking that provided the impetus for his successors such as Lawrence Roberts and established
Robert Taylor to further the ARPANET development. Licklider later returned to lead the IPTO in 1973
Commercialization,
for two years.[12] privatization, broader access
leads to the modern Internet:
Development of packet switching
1995: New Internet
The issue of connecting separate physical networks to form one logical network was the first of many architecture with
problems. In the 1960s, Paul Baran of the RAND Corporation produced a study of survivable networks commercial ISPs
for the U.S. military in the event of nuclear war.[13] Information transmitted across Baran's network connected at NAPs
would be divided into what he called "message-blocks". Independently, Donald Davies (National 1995: NSFNET
Physical Laboratory, UK), proposed and was the first to put into practice a similar network based on decommissioned
what he called packet-switching, the term that would ultimately be adopted. Leonard Kleinrock (MIT) 1995: GOSIP updated to
developed a mathematical theory behind this technology (without the packets). Packet-switching allow TCP/IP
provides better bandwidth utilization and response times than the traditional circuit-switching 1995: very high-speed
technology used for telephony, particularly on resource-limited interconnection links.[14] Backbone Network
Service (vBNS)
Packet switching is a rapid store and forward networking design that divides messages up into arbitrary
1995: IPv6 proposed
packets, with routing decisions made per-packet. Early networks used message switched systems that
1998: Internet
required rigid routing structures prone to single point of failure. This led Tommy Krash and Paul
Corporation for
Baran's U.S. military-funded research to focus on using message-blocks to include network
Assigned Names and
redundancy.[15]
Numbers (ICANN)
1999: IEEE 802.11b
Networks that led to the Internet wireless networking
1999: Internet2/Abilene
ARPANET Network
1999: vBNS+ allows
Promoted to the head of the information processing office at Defense Advanced Research Projects
3 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
Agency (DARPA), Robert Taylor intended to realize Licklider's ideas of an interconnected networking
broader access
system. Bringing in Larry Roberts from MIT, he initiated a project to build such a network. The first
2000: Dot-com bubble
ARPANET link was established between the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and the
bursts
Stanford Research Institute at 22:30 hours on October 29, 1969.[16]
2001: New top-level
domain names activated
"We set up a telephone connection between us and the guys at SRI ...", Kleinrock ... said in 2001: Code Red I, Code
an interview: "We typed the L and we asked on the phone, Red II, and Nimda
worms
"Do you see the L?" 2003: UN World Summit
"Yes, we see the L," came the response. on the Information
We typed the O, and we asked, "Do you see the O." Society (WSIS) phase I
"Yes, we see the O."
Then we typed the G, and the system crashed ... 2003: National
LambdaRail founded
Yet a revolution had begun" ....[17] 2004: UN Working
Group on Internet
Governance (WGIG)
By December 5, 1969, a 4-node network was connected by
2005: UN WSIS phase II
adding the University of Utah and the University of California,
2006: First meeting of
Santa Barbara. Building on ideas developed in ALOHAnet, the
the Internet Governance
ARPANET grew rapidly. By 1981, the number of hosts had
grown to 213, with a new host being added approximately every Forum
[18][19] 2010: First
twenty days.
internationalized country
ARPANET development was centered around the Request for code top-level domains
Comments (RFC) process, still used today for proposing and registered
35 Years of the Internet, 19692004. distributing Internet Protocols and Systems. RFC 1, entitled 2012: ICANN begins
Stamp of Azerbaijan, 2004. "Host Software", was written by Steve Crocker from the accepting applications
University of California, Los Angeles, and published on April for new generic top-level
7, 1969. These early years were documented in the 1972 film Computer Networks: The Heralds of domain names
Resource Sharing. 2013: Montevideo
Statement on the Future
ARPANET became the technical core of what would become the Internet, and a primary tool in of Internet Cooperation
developing the technologies used. The early ARPANET used the Network Control Program (NCP, 2014: NetMundial
sometimes Network Control Protocol) rather than TCP/IP. On January 1, 1983, known as flag day, NCP international Internet
on the ARPANET was replaced by the more flexible and powerful family of TCP/IP protocols, governance proposal
marking the start of the modern Internet.[20]
Examples of popular Internet
International collaborations on ARPANET were sparse. For various political reasons, European services:
developers were concerned with developing the X.25 networks. Notable exceptions were the
Norwegian Seismic Array (NORSAR) in 1972, followed in 1973 by Sweden with satellite links to the 1990: IMDb Internet
Tanum Earth Station and Peter Kirstein's research group in the UK, initially at the Institute of movie database
Computer Science, London University and later at University College London.[21] 1995: Amazon.com
online retailer
NPL 1995: eBay online
auction and shopping
In 1965, Donald Davies of the National Physical Laboratory (United Kingdom) proposed a national 1995: Craigslist
data network based on packet-switching. The proposal was not taken up nationally, but by 1970 he had classified advertisements
designed and built the Mark I packet-switched network to meet the needs of the multidisciplinary 1996: Hotmail free
laboratory and prove the technology under operational conditions.[22] By 1976 12 computers and 75 web-based e-mail
terminal devices were attached and more were added until the network was replaced in 1986. NPL, 1997: Babel Fish
followed by ARPANET, were the first two networks in the world to use packet switching. [23][24] automatic translation
1998: Google Search
Merit Network 1998: Yahoo! Clubs
(now Yahoo! Groups)
The Merit Network [25] was formed in 1966 as the Michigan Educational Research Information Triad to 1998: PayPal Internet
explore computer networking between three of Michigan's public universities as a means to help the payment system
1999: Napster
state's educational and economic development.[26] With initial support from the State of Michigan and
the National Science Foundation (NSF), the packet-switched network was first demonstrated in peer-to-peer file sharing
December 1971 when an interactive host to host connection was made between the IBM mainframe 2001: BitTorrent
4 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
computer systems at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and Wayne State University in
peer-to-peer file sharing
Detroit.[27] In October 1972 connections to the CDC mainframe at Michigan State University in East 2001: Wikipedia, the
Lansing completed the triad. Over the next several years in addition to host to host interactive free encyclopedia
connections the network was enhanced to support terminal to host connections, host to host batch
2003: LinkedIn business
connections (remote job submission, remote printing, batch file transfer), interactive file transfer,
networking
gateways to the Tymnet and Telenet public data networks, X.25 host attachments, gateways to X.25
2003: Myspace social
data networks, Ethernet attached hosts, and eventually TCP/IP and additional public universities in
networking site
Michigan join the network.[27][28] All of this set the stage for Merit's role in the NSFNET project
2003: Skype Internet
starting in the mid-1980s.
voice calls
2003: iTunes Store
CYCLADES
2003: 4Chan
Anonymous
The CYCLADES packet switching network was a French research network designed and directed by
image-based bulletin
Louis Pouzin. First demonstrated in 1973, it was developed to explore alternatives to the initial
board
ARPANET design and to support network research generally. It was the first network to make the hosts
2003: The Pirate Bay,
responsible for the reliable delivery of data, rather than the network itself, using unreliable datagrams
torrent file host
and associated end-to-end protocol mechanisms.[29][30]
2004: Facebook social
networking site
X.25 and public data networks 2004: Podcast media file
series
Based on ARPA's research, packet switching network standards 2004: Flickr image
were developed by the International Telecommunication Union hosting
(ITU) in the form of X.25 and related standards. While using
2005: YouTube video
packet switching, X.25 is built on the concept of virtual circuits
sharing
emulating traditional telephone connections. In 1974, X.25
2005: Reddit link voting
formed the basis for the SERCnet network between British
2005: Google Earth
academic and research sites, which later became JANET. The
virtual globe
1974 ABC interview with Arthur C. initial ITU Standard on X.25 was approved in March 1976.[31]
2006: Twitter
Clarke, in which he describes a future
The British Post Office, Western Union International and microblogging
of ubiquitous networked personal
Tymnet collaborated to create the first international packet 2007: WikiLeaks
computers.
switched network, referred to as the International Packet anonymous news and
Switched Service (IPSS), in 1978. This network grew from information leaks
Europe and the US to cover Canada, Hong Kong, and Australia by 1981. By the 1990s it provided a 2007: Google Street
worldwide networking infrastructure. [32] View
2007: Kindle, e-reader
Unlike ARPANET, X.25 was commonly available for business use. Telenet offered its Telemail and virtual bookshop
electronic mail service, which was also targeted to enterprise use rather than the general email system 2008: Amazon Elastic
of the ARPANET. Compute Cloud (EC2)
2008: Dropbox
The first public dial-in networks used asynchronous TTY terminal protocols to reach a concentrator cloud-based file hosting
operated in the public network. Some networks, such as CompuServe, used X.25 to multiplex the 2008: Encyclopedia of
terminal sessions into their packet-switched backbones, while others, such as Tymnet, used proprietary
Life, a collaborative
protocols. In 1979, CompuServe became the first service to offer electronic mail capabilities and
encyclopedia intended to
technical support to personal computer users. The company broke new ground again in 1980 as the first
document all living
to offer real-time chat with its CB Simulator. Other major dial-in networks were America Online
species
(AOL) and Prodigy that also provided communications, content, and entertainment features. Many
bulletin board system (BBS) networks also provided on-line access, such as FidoNet which was 2008: Spotify, a
popular amongst hobbyist computer users, many of them hackers and amateur radio operators. DRM-based music
streaming service
UUCP and Usenet 2009: Bing search
engine
2009: Google Docs,
In 1979, two students at Duke University, Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis, originated the idea of using
Bourne shell scripts to transfer news and messages on a serial line UUCP connection with nearby Web-based word
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Following public release of the software in 1980, the mesh processor, spreadsheet,
of UUCP hosts forwarding on the Usenet news rapidly expanded. UUCPnet, as it would later be presentation, form, and
named, also created gateways and links between FidoNet and dial-up BBS hosts. UUCP networks data storage service
spread quickly due to the lower costs involved, ability to use existing leased lines, X.25 links or even 2009: Kickstarter, a
ARPANET connections, and the lack of strict use policies compared to later networks like CSNET and threshold pledge system
Bitnet. All connects were local. By 1981 the number of UUCP hosts had grown to 550, nearly doubling 2009: Bitcoin, a digital
to 940 in 1984. Sublink Network, operating since 1987 and officially founded in Italy in 1989, based currency
5 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
its interconnectivity upon UUCP to redistribute mail and news groups messages throughout its Italian
2010: Instagram, photo
nodes (about 100 at the time) owned both by private individuals and small companies. Sublink
sharing and social
Network represented possibly one of the first examples of the Internet technology becoming progress
networking
through popular diffusion.[33]
2011: Google+, social
networking
Merging the networks and creating the Internet (197395) 2011: Snapchat, photo
sharing
TCP/IP 2012: Coursera, massive
open online courses
With so many different network methods, something was needed to
unify them. Robert E. Kahn of DARPA and ARPANET recruited
Vinton Cerf of Stanford University to work with him on the
problem. By 1973, they had worked out a fundamental
reformulation, where the differences between network protocols
A Stanford Research Institute's were hidden by using a common internetwork protocol, and
Packet Radio Van, site of the first
instead of the network being responsible for reliability, as in the
three-way internetworked
ARPANET, the hosts became responsible. Cerf credits Hubert
Zimmermann, Gerard LeLann and Louis Pouzin (designer of the
transmission.
CYCLADES network) with important work on this design.[34]
The specification of the resulting protocol, RFC 675 Specification of Internet Transmission
Control Program, by Vinton Cerf, Yogen Dalal and Carl Sunshine, Network Working Group,
December 1974, contains the first attested use of the term internet, as a shorthand for
internetworking; later RFCs repeat this use, so the word started out as an adjective rather than the
noun it is today.
With the role of the network reduced to the bare minimum, it became possible to join almost any
networks together, no matter what their characteristics were, thereby solving Kahn's initial problem.
Map of the TCP/IP test network in
DARPA agreed to fund development of prototype software, and after several years of work, the first
February 1982
demonstration of a gateway between the Packet Radio network in the SF Bay area and the
ARPANET was conducted by the Stanford Research Institute. On November 22, 1977 a three
network demonstration was conducted including the ARPANET, the SRI's Packet Radio Van on the Packet Radio Network and the Atlantic
Packet Satellite network.[35][36]
Stemming from the first specifications of TCP in 1974, TCP/IP emerged in mid-late 1978 in nearly its final form, as used for the first
decades of the Internet, known as "IPv4". (IPv4 eventually became superseded by its successor, called "IPv6", but this was largely due to
the sheer number of devices being connected post-2005, which overwhelmed the numbers that IPv4 had been able to accommodate
worldwide. However, due to IPv4's entrenched position by that time, the shift is still in its early stages as of 2015, and expected to take
many years, decades, or perhaps longer, to complete).
The associated standards for IPv4 were published by 1981 as RFCs 791, 792 and 793, and adopted for use. DARPA sponsored or
encouraged the development of TCP/IP implementations for many operating systems and then scheduled a migration of all hosts on all of its
packet networks to TCP/IP. On January 1, 1983, known as flag day, TCP/IP protocols became the only approved protocol on the
ARPANET, replacing the earlier NCP protocol.[37]
From ARPANET to NSFNET
After the ARPANET had been up and running for several years, ARPA looked for another agency to hand off the network to; ARPA's
primary mission was funding cutting edge research and development, not running a communications utility. Eventually, in July 1975, the
network had been turned over to the Defense Communications Agency, also part of the Department of Defense. In 1983, the U.S. military
portion of the ARPANET was broken off as a separate network, the MILNET. MILNET subsequently became the unclassified but
military-only NIPRNET, in parallel with the SECRET-level SIPRNET and JWICS for TOP SECRET and above. NIPRNET does have
controlled security gateways to the public Internet.
The networks based on the ARPANET were government funded and therefore restricted to noncommercial uses such as research; unrelated
commercial use was strictly forbidden. This initially restricted connections to military sites and universities. During the 1980s, the
connections expanded to more educational institutions, and even to a growing number of companies such as Digital Equipment Corporation
and Hewlett-Packard, which were participating in research projects or providing services to those who were.
Several other branches of the U.S. government, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Science
Foundation (NSF), and the Department of Energy (DOE) became heavily involved in Internet research and started development of a
successor to ARPANET. In the mid-1980s, all three of these branches developed the first Wide Area Networks based on TCP/IP. NASA
6 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
developed the NASA Science Network, NSF developed CSNET and DOE evolved
the Energy Sciences Network or ESNet.
NASA developed the TCP/IP based NASA Science Network (NSN) in the
mid-1980s, connecting space scientists to data and information stored anywhere in
the world. In 1989, the DECnet-based Space Physics Analysis Network (SPAN) and
the TCP/IP-based NASA Science Network (NSN) were brought together at NASA
Ames Research Center creating the first multiprotocol wide area network called the
NASA Science Internet, or NSI. NSI was established to provide a totally integrated
communications infrastructure to the NASA scientific community for the
advancement of earth, space and life sciences. As a high-speed, multiprotocol,
international network, NSI provided connectivity to over 20,000 scientists across all
seven continents.
In 1981 NSF supported the development of the Computer Science Network BBN Technologies TCP/IP Internet map of early 1986.
(CSNET). CSNET connected with ARPANET using TCP/IP, and ran TCP/IP over
X.25, but it also supported departments without sophisticated network connections,
using automated dial-up mail exchange.
In 1986, the NSF created NSFNET, a 56 kbit/s backbone to support the

NSF-sponsored supercomputing centers. The NSFNET also provided support for the
creation of regional research and education networks in the United States, and for the
connection of university and college campus networks to the regional networks.[38]
The use of NSFNET and the regional networks was not limited to supercomputer
users and the 56 kbit/s network quickly became overloaded. NSFNET was upgraded
to 1.5 Mbit/s in 1988 under a cooperative agreement with the Merit Network in
partnership with IBM, MCI, and the State of Michigan. The existence of NSFNET
and the creation of Federal Internet Exchanges (FIXes) allowed the ARPANET to be T3 NSFNET Backbone, c. 1992
decommissioned in 1990. NSFNET was expanded and upgraded to 45 Mbit/s in
1991, and was decommissioned in 1995 when it was replaced by backbones operated
by several commercial Internet Service Providers.
Transition towards the Internet
The term "internet" was adopted in the first RFC published on the TCP protocol (RFC 675:[39] Internet Transmission Control Program,
December 1974) as an abbreviation of the term internetworking and the two terms were used interchangeably. In general, an internet was
any network using TCP/IP. It was around the time when ARPANET was interlinked with NSFNET in the late 1980s, that the term was used
as the name of the network, Internet, being the large and global TCP/IP network.[40]
As interest in networking grew and new applications for it were developed, the Internet's technologies spread throughout the rest of the
world. The network-agnostic approach in TCP/IP meant that it was easy to use any existing network infrastructure, such as the IPSS X.25
network, to carry Internet traffic. In 1984, University College London replaced its transatlantic satellite links with TCP/IP over IPSS.[41]
Many sites unable to link directly to the Internet created simple gateways for the transfer of electronic mail, the most important application
of the time. Sites with only intermittent connections used UUCP or FidoNet and relied on the gateways between these networks and the
Internet. Some gateway services went beyond simple mail peering, such as allowing access to File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites via UUCP
or mail.[42]
Finally, routing technologies were developed for the Internet to remove the remaining centralized routing aspects. The Exterior Gateway
Protocol (EGP) was replaced by a new protocol, the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). This provided a meshed topology for the Internet and
reduced the centric architecture which ARPANET had emphasized. In 1994, Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) was introduced to
support better conservation of address space which allowed use of route aggregation to decrease the size of routing tables.[43]
TCP/IP goes global (1980s)
CERN, the European Internet, the link to the Pacific and beyond
Between 1984 and 1988 CERN began installation and operation of TCP/IP to interconnect its major internal computer systems,
workstations, PCs and an accelerator control system. CERN continued to operate a limited self-developed system (CERNET) internally and
several incompatible (typically proprietary) network protocols externally. There was considerable resistance in Europe towards more
widespread use of TCP/IP, and the CERN TCP/IP intranets remained isolated from the Internet until 1989.
7 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
In 1988, Daniel Karrenberg, from Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) in Amsterdam, visited Ben Segal, CERN's TCP/IP Coordinator,
looking for advice about the transition of the European side of the UUCP Usenet network (much of which ran over X.25 links) over to
TCP/IP. In 1987, Ben Segal had met with Len Bosack from the then still small company Cisco about purchasing some TCP/IP routers for
CERN, and was able to give Karrenberg advice and forward him on to Cisco for the appropriate hardware. This expanded the European
portion of the Internet across the existing UUCP networks, and in 1989 CERN opened its first external TCP/IP connections.[44] This
coincided with the creation of Rseaux IP Europens (RIPE), initially a group of IP network administrators who met regularly to carry out
coordination work together. Later, in 1992, RIPE was formally registered as a cooperative in Amsterdam.
At the same time as the rise of internetworking in Europe, ad hoc networking to ARPA and in-between Australian universities formed,
based on various technologies such as X.25 and UUCPNet. These were limited in their connection to the global networks, due to the cost of
making individual international UUCP dial-up or X.25 connections. In 1989, Australian universities joined the push towards using IP
protocols to unify their networking infrastructures. AARNet was formed in 1989 by the Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee and
provided a dedicated IP based network for Australia.
The Internet began to penetrate Asia in the 1980s. In May 1982 South Korea became the second country to successfully set up TCP/IP IPv4
network.[45][46] Japan, which had built the UUCP-based network JUNET in 1984, connected to NSFNET in 1989. It hosted the annual
meeting of the Internet Society, INET'92, in Kobe. Singapore developed TECHNET in 1990, and Thailand gained a global Internet
connection between Chulalongkorn University and UUNET in 1992.[47]
The early global "digital divide" emerges
While developed countries with technological infrastructures were joining the

Internet, developing countries began to experience a digital divide separating
them from the Internet. On an essentially continental basis, they are building
organizations for Internet resource administration and sharing operational
experience, as more and more transmission facilities go into place.
Africa
At the beginning of the 1990s, African countries relied upon X.25 IPSS and
2400 baud modem UUCP links for international and internetwork computer
communications. Internet users in 2012 as a percentage of a country's
population
In August 1995, InfoMail Uganda, Ltd., a privately held firm in Kampala now
Source: International Telecommunications Union.[48]
known as InfoCom, and NSN Network Services of Avon, Colorado, sold in
1997 and now known as Clear Channel Satellite, established Africa's first
native TCP/IP high-speed satellite Internet services. The data connection was
originally carried by a C-Band RSCC Russian satellite which connected
InfoMail's Kampala offices directly to NSN's MAE-West point of presence
using a private network from NSN's leased ground station in New Jersey.
InfoCom's first satellite connection was just 64 kbit/s, serving a Sun host
computer and twelve US Robotics dial-up modems.
In 1996, a USAID funded project, the Leland Initiative, started work on

developing full Internet connectivity for the continent. Guinea, Mozambique,
Madagascar and Rwanda gained satellite earth stations in 1997, followed by
Ivory Coast and Benin in 1998.
Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions in 2012
Africa is building an Internet infrastructure. AfriNIC, headquartered in as a percentage of a country's population
Mauritius, manages IP address allocation for the continent. As do the other Source: International Telecommunications Union.[49]
Internet regions, there is an operational forum, the Internet Community of
Operational Networking Specialists.[51]
There are many programs to provide high-performance transmission plant, and the western and southern coasts have undersea optical cable.
High-speed cables join North Africa and the Horn of Africa to intercontinental cable systems. Undersea cable development is slower for
East Africa; the original joint effort between New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) and the East Africa Submarine System
(Eassy) has broken off and may become two efforts.[52]
Asia and Oceania
The Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC), headquartered in Australia, manages IP address allocation for the continent.
APNIC sponsors an operational forum, the Asia-Pacific Regional Internet Conference on Operational Technologies (APRICOT).[53]
8 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
In 1991, the People's Republic of China saw its first TCP/IP college network,
Tsinghua University's TUNET. The PRC went on to make its first global
Internet connection in 1994, between the Beijing Electro-Spectrometer
Collaboration and Stanford University's Linear Accelerator Center. However,
China went on to implement its own digital divide by implementing a
country-wide content filter.[54]
Latin America
As with the other regions, the Latin American and Caribbean Internet
Addresses Registry (LACNIC) manages the IP address space and other Mobile broadband Internet subscriptions in 2012
resources for its area. LACNIC, headquartered in Uruguay, operates DNS root, as a percentage of a country's population
reverse DNS, and other key services. Source: International Telecommunications Union.[50]
Rise of the global Internet (late 1980s/early 1990s onward)
Initially, as with its predecessor networks, the system that would evolve into the Internet was primarily for government and government
body use.
However, interest in commercial use of the Internet quickly became a commonly debated topic. Although commercial use was forbidden,
the exact definition of commercial use was unclear and subjective. UUCPNet and the X.25 IPSS had no such restrictions, which would
eventually see the official barring of UUCPNet use of ARPANET and NSFNET connections. (Some UUCP links still remained connecting
to these networks however, as administrators cast a blind eye to their operation.)
As a result, during the late 1980s, the first Internet service provider (ISP)
companies were formed. Companies like PSINet, UUNET, Netcom, and Portal
Software were formed to provide service to the regional research networks and
provide alternate network access, UUCP-based email and Usenet News to the
public. The first commercial dialup ISP in the United States was The World,
which opened in 1989.[56]
In 1992, the U.S. Congress passed the Scientific and Advanced-Technology

Act, 42 U.S.C. 1862(g) (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42
/1862(g)), which allowed NSF to support access by the research and education
communities to computer networks which were not used exclusively for
research and education purposes, thus permitting NSFNET to interconnect
with commercial networks.[57][58] This caused controversy within the research
and education community, who were concerned commercial use of the
network might lead to an Internet that was less responsive to their needs, and
within the community of commercial network providers, who felt that Number of Internet hosts worldwide: 19692012
government subsidies were giving an unfair advantage to some Source: Internet Systems Consortium.[55]
organizations.[59]
By 1990, ARPANET's goals had been fulfilled and new networking technologies exceeded the original scope and the project came to a
close. New network service providers including PSINet, Alternet, CERFNet, ANS CO+RE, and many others were offering network access
to commercial customers. NSFNET was no longer the de facto backbone and exchange point of the Internet. The Commercial Internet
eXchange (CIX), Metropolitan Area Exchanges (MAEs), and later Network Access Points (NAPs) were becoming the primary
interconnections between many networks. The final restrictions on carrying commercial traffic ended on April 30, 1995 when the National
Science Foundation ended its sponsorship of the NSFNET Backbone Service and the service ended.[60][61] NSF provided initial support for
the NAPs and interim support to help the regional research and education networks transition to commercial ISPs. NSF also sponsored the
very high speed Backbone Network Service (vBNS) which continued to provide support for the supercomputing centers and research and
education in the United States.[62]
World Wide Web and introduction of browsers
The World Wide Web (sometimes abbreviated "www" or "W3") is an information space where documents and other web resources are
identified by URIs, interlinked by hypertext links, and can be accessed via the Internet using a web browser and (more recently) web-based
applications.[63] It has become known simply as "the Web". As of the 2010s, the World Wide Web is the primary tool billions use to interact
on the Internet, and it has changed people's lives immeasurably.[64][65][66]
Precursors to the web browser emerged in the form of hyperlinked applications during the mid and late 1980s (the bare concept of
9 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
hyperlinking had by then existed for some decades). Following these, Tim Berners-Lee is credited with inventing the World Wide Web in
1989 and developing in 1990 both the first web server, and the first web browser, called WorldWideWeb (no spaces) and later renamed
Nexus.[67] Many others were soon developed, with Marc Andreessen's 1993 Mosaic (later Netscape),[68] being particularly easy to use and
install, and often credited with sparking the internet boom of the 1990s.[69] Today, the major web browsers are Firefox, Internet Explorer,
Google Chrome, Opera and Safari.[70]
A boost in web users was triggered in September 1993 by NCSA Mosaic, a graphical browser which eventually ran on several popular
office and home computers.[71] This was the first web browser aiming to bring multimedia content to non-technical users, and therefore
included images and text on the same page, unlike previous browser designs;[72] its founder, Marc Andreessen, also established the
company that in 1994, released Netscape Navigator, which resulted in one of the early browser wars, when it ended up in a competition for
dominance (which it lost) with Microsoft Windows' Internet Explorer. Commercial use restrictions were lifted in 1995. The online service
America Online (AOL) offered their users a connection to the Internet via their own internal browser.
Use in wider society 1990s to early 2000s (Web 1.0)
During the first decade or so of the public internet, the immense changes it would eventually enable in the 2000s were still nascent. In terms
of providing context for this period, mobile cellular devices ("smartphones" and other cellular devices) which today provide near-universal
access, were used for business and not a routine household item owned by parents and children worldwide. Social media in the modern
sense had yet to come into existence, laptops were bulky and most households did not have computers. Data rates were slow and most
people lacked means to video or digitize video so websites such as YouTube did not yet exist, media storage was transitioning slowly from
analog tape to digital optical discs (DVD and to an extent still, floppy disc to CD). Enabling technologies used from the early 2000s such as
PHP, modern Javascript and Java, technologies such as AJAX, HTML 4 (and its emphasis on CSS), and various software frameworks,
which enabled and simplified speed of web development, largely awaited invention and their eventual widespread adoption.
The Internet was widely used for mailing lists, emails, e-commerce and early popular online shopping (Amazon and eBay for example),
online forums and bulletin boards, and personal websites and blogs, and use was growing rapidly, but by more modern standards the
systems used were static and lacked widespread social engagement. It awaited a number of events in the early 2000s to change from a
communications technology to gradually develop into a key part of global society's infrastructure.
Typical design elements of these "Web 1.0" era websites included:[73] Static pages instead of dynamic HTML;[74] content served from
filesystems instead of relational databases; pages built using Server Side Includes or CGI instead of a web application written in a dynamic
programming language; HTML 3.2-era structures such as frames and tables to create page layouts; online guestbooks; overuse of GIF
buttons and similar small graphics promoting particular items;[75] and HTML forms sent via email. (Support for server side scripting was
rare on shared servers so the usual feedback mechanism was via email, using mailto forms and their email program.[76]
During the period 1997 to 2001, the first speculative investment bubble related to the Internet took place, in which "dot-com" companies
(referring to the ".com" top level domain used by businesses) were propelled to exceedingly high valuations as investors rapidly stoked
stock values, followed by a market crash; the first dot-com bubble. However this only temporarily slowed enthusiasm and growth, which
quickly recovered and continued to grow.
The changes that would propel the Internet into its place as a social system took place during a relatively short period of no more than five
years, starting from around 2004. They included:
The call to "Web 2.0" in 2004 (first suggested in 1999),

Accelerating adoption and commoditization among households of, and familiarity with, the necessary hardware (such as
computers).
Accelerating storage technology and data access speeds hard drives emerged, took over from far smaller, slower floppy discs,
and grew from megabytes to gigabytes (and by around 2010, terabytes), RAM from hundreds of kilobytes to gigabytes as
typical amounts on a system, and Ethernet, the enabling technology for TCP/IP, moved from common speeds of kilobits to tens
of megabits per second, to gigabits per second.
High speed Internet and wider coverage of data connections, at lower prices, allowing larger traffic rates, more reliable simpler
traffic, and traffic from more locations,
The gradually accelerating perception of the ability of computers to create new means and approaches to communication, the
emergence of social media and websites such as Twitter and Facebook to their later prominence, and global collaborations such
as Wikipedia (which existed before but gained prominence as a result),
and shortly after (approximately 20072008 onward):
The mobile revolution, which provided access to the Internet to much of human society of all ages, in their daily lives, and
allowed them to share, discuss, and continually update, inquire, and respond.
Non-volatile RAM rapidly grew in size and reliability, and decreased in price, becoming a commodity capable of enabling high
10 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
levels of computing activity on these small handheld devices as well as solid-state drives (SSD).
An emphasis on power efficient processor and device design, rather than purely high processing power; one of the beneficiaries
of this was ARM, a British company which had focused since the 1980s on powerful but low cost simple microprocessors.
ARM rapidly gained dominance in the market for mobile and embedded devices.
With the call to Web 2.0, the period up to around 20042005 was retrospectively named and described by some as Web 1.0.
Web 2.0
The term "Web 2.0" describes websites that emphasize user-generated content (including user-to-user interaction), usability, and
interoperability. It first appeared in a January 1999 article called "Fragmented Future" written by Darcy DiNucci, a consultant on electronic
information design, where she wrote:[77][78][79][80]
"The Web we know now, which loads into a browser window in essentially static screenfuls, is only an embryo of the Web to come.
The first glimmerings of Web 2.0 are beginning to appear, and we are just starting to see how that embryo might develop. The Web
will be understood not as screenfuls of text and graphics but as a transport mechanism, the ether through which interactivity happens.
It will [...] appear on your computer screen, [...] on your TV set [...] your car dashboard [...] your cell phone [...] hand-held game
machines [...] maybe even your microwave oven."
The term resurfaced during 2002 2004,[81][82][83][84] and gained prominence in late 2004 following presentations by Tim O'Reilly and
Dale Dougherty at the first Web 2.0 Conference. In their opening remarks, John Battelle and Tim O'Reilly outlined their definition of the
"Web as Platform", where software applications are built upon the Web as opposed to upon the desktop. The unique aspect of this migration,
they argued, is that "customers are building your business for you".[85] They argued that the activities of users generating content (in the
form of ideas, text, videos, or pictures) could be "harnessed" to create value.
Web 2.0 does not refer to an update to any technical specification, but rather to cumulative changes in the way Web pages are made and
used. Web 2.0 describes an approach, in which sites focus substantially upon allowing users to interact and collaborate with each other in a
social media dialogue as creators of user-generated content in a virtual community, in contrast to Web sites where people are limited to the
passive viewing of content. Examples of Web 2.0 include social networking sites, blogs, wikis, folksonomies, video sharing sites, hosted
services, Web applications, and mashups.[86] Terry Flew, in his 3rd Edition of New Media described what he believed to characterize the
differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0:
"[The] move from personal websites to blogs and blog site aggregation, from publishing to participation, from web content as the
outcome of large up-front investment to an ongoing and interactive process, and from content management systems to links based on
tagging (folksonomy)".[87]
This era saw several household names gain prominence through their community-oriented operation YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit
and Wikipedia being some examples.
The mobile revolution
The process of change generally described as "Web 2.0" was itself greatly accelerated and transformed only a short time later by the
increasing growth in mobile devices. This mobile revolution meant that computers in the form of smartphones became something many
people used, took with them everywhere, communicated with, used for photographs and videos they instantly shared or to shop or seek
information "on the move" and used socially, as opposed to items on a desk at home or just used for work.
Location-based services, services using location and other sensor information, and crowdsourcing (frequently but not always location
based), became common, with posts tagged by location, or websites and services becoming location aware. Mobile-targeted websites (such
as "m.website.com") became common, designed especially for the new devices used. Netbooks, ultrabooks, widespread 4G and Wi-Fi, and
mobile chips capable or running at nearly the power of desktops from not many years before on far lower power usage, became enablers of
this stage of Internet development, and the term "App" emerged (short for "Application program" or "Program") as did the "App store".
Networking in outer space
The first Internet link into low earth orbit was established on January 22, 2010 when astronaut T. J. Creamer posted the first unassisted
update to his Twitter account from the International Space Station, marking the extension of the Internet into space.[88] (Astronauts at the
ISS had used email and Twitter before, but these messages had been relayed to the ground through a NASA data link before being posted by
a human proxy.) This personal Web access, which NASA calls the Crew Support LAN, uses the space station's high-speed Ku band
microwave link. To surf the Web, astronauts can use a station laptop computer to control a desktop computer on Earth, and they can talk to
their families and friends on Earth using Voice over IP equipment.[89]
11 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
Communication with spacecraft beyond earth orbit has traditionally been over point-to-point links through the Deep Space Network. Each
such data link must be manually scheduled and configured. In the late 1990s NASA and Google began working on a new network protocol,
Delay-tolerant networking (DTN) which automates this process, allows networking of spaceborne transmission nodes, and takes the fact
into account that spacecraft can temporarily lose contact because they move behind the Moon or planets, or because space weather disrupts
the connection. Under such conditions, DTN retransmits data packages instead of dropping them, as the standard TCP/IP Internet Protocol
does. NASA conducted the first field test of what it calls the "deep space internet" in November 2008.[90] Testing of DTN-based
communications between the International Space Station and Earth (now termed Disruption-Tolerant Networking) has been ongoing since
March 2009, and is scheduled to continue until March 2014.[91]
This network technology is supposed to ultimately enable missions that involve multiple spacecraft where reliable inter-vessel
communication might take precedence over vessel-to-earth downlinks. According to a February 2011 statement by Google's Vint Cerf, the
so-called "Bundle protocols" have been uploaded to NASA's EPOXI mission spacecraft (which is in orbit around the Sun) and
communication with Earth has been tested at a distance of approximately 80 light seconds.[92]
Internet governance
As a globally distributed network of voluntarily interconnected autonomous networks, the Internet operates without a central governing
body. It has no centralized governance for either technology or policies, and each constituent network chooses what technologies and
protocols it will deploy from the voluntary technical standards that are developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).[93]
However, throughout its entire history, the Internet system has had an "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority" (IANA) for the allocation and
assignment of various technical identifiers needed for the operation of the Internet.[94] The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers (ICANN) provides oversight and coordination for two principal name spaces in the Internet, the Internet Protocol address space
and the Domain Name System.
NIC, InterNIC, IANA and ICANN
The IANA function was originally performed by USC Information Sciences Institute, and it delegated portions of this responsibility with
respect to numeric network and autonomous system identifiers to the Network Information Center (NIC) at Stanford Research Institute (SRI
International) in Menlo Park, California. In addition to his role as the RFC Editor, Jon Postel worked as the manager of IANA until his
death in 1998.
As the early ARPANET grew, hosts were referred to by names, and a HOSTS.TXT file would be distributed from SRI International to each
host on the network. As the network grew, this became cumbersome. A technical solution came in the form of the Domain Name System,
created by Paul Mockapetris. The Defense Data NetworkNetwork Information Center (DDN-NIC) at SRI handled all registration
services, including the top-level domains (TLDs) of .mil, .gov, .edu, .org, .net, .com and .us, root nameserver administration and Internet
number assignments under a United States Department of Defense contract.[94] In 1991, the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)
awarded the administration and maintenance of DDN-NIC (managed by SRI up until this point) to Government Systems, Inc., who
subcontracted it to the small private-sector Network Solutions, Inc.[95][96]
The increasing cultural diversity of the Internet also posed administrative challenges for centralized management of the IP addresses. In
October 1992, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) published RFC 1366,[97] which described the "growth of the Internet and its
increasing globalization" and set out the basis for an evolution of the IP registry process, based on a regionally distributed registry model.
This document stressed the need for a single Internet number registry to exist in each geographical region of the world (which would be of
"continental dimensions"). Registries would be "unbiased and widely recognized by network providers and subscribers" within their region.
The RIPE Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) was established as the first RIR in May 1992. The second RIR, the Asia Pacific
Network Information Centre (APNIC), was established in Tokyo in 1993, as a pilot project of the Asia Pacific Networking Group.[98]
Since at this point in history most of the growth on the Internet was coming from non-military sources, it was decided that the Department
of Defense would no longer fund registration services outside of the .mil TLD. In 1993 the U.S. National Science Foundation, after a
competitive bidding process in 1992, created the InterNIC to manage the allocations of addresses and management of the address databases,
and awarded the contract to three organizations. Registration Services would be provided by Network Solutions; Directory and Database
Services would be provided by AT&T; and Information Services would be provided by General Atomics.[99]
Over time, after consultation with the IANA, the IETF, RIPE NCC, APNIC, and the Federal Networking Council (FNC), the decision was
made to separate the management of domain names from the management of IP numbers.[98] Following the examples of RIPE NCC and
APNIC, it was recommended that management of IP address space then administered by the InterNIC should be under the control of those
that use it, specifically the ISPs, end-user organizations, corporate entities, universities, and individuals. As a result, the American Registry
for Internet Numbers (ARIN) was established as in December 1997, as an independent, not-for-profit corporation by direction of the
National Science Foundation and became the third Regional Internet Registry.[100]
12 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
In 1998, both the IANA and remaining DNS-related InterNIC functions were reorganized under the control of ICANN, a California
non-profit corporation contracted by the United States Department of Commerce to manage a number of Internet-related tasks. As these
tasks involved technical coordination for two principal Internet name spaces (DNS names and IP addresses) created by the IETF, ICANN
also signed a memorandum of understanding with the IAB to define the technical work to be carried out by the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority.[101] The management of Internet address space remained with the regional Internet registries, which collectively were defined as
a supporting organization within the ICANN structure.[102] ICANN provides central coordination for the DNS system, including policy
coordination for the split registry / registrar system, with competition among registry service providers to serve each top-level-domain and
multiple competing registrars offering DNS services to end-users.
Internet Engineering Task Force
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is the largest and most visible of several loosely related ad-hoc groups that provide technical
direction for the Internet, including the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG), and the Internet
Research Task Force (IRTF).
The IETF is a loosely self-organized group of international volunteers who contribute to the engineering and evolution of Internet
technologies. It is the principal body engaged in the development of new Internet standard specifications. Much of the work of the IETF is
organized into Working Groups. Standardization efforts of the Working Groups are often adopted by the Internet community, but the IETF
does not control or patrol the Internet.[103][104]
The IETF grew out of quarterly meeting of U.S. government-funded researchers, starting in January 1986. Non-government representatives
were invited by the fourth IETF meeting in October 1986. The concept of Working Groups was introduced at the fifth meeting in February
1987. The seventh meeting in July 1987 was the first meeting with more than one hundred attendees. In 1992, the Internet Society, a
professional membership society, was formed and IETF began to operate under it as an independent international standards body. The first
IETF meeting outside of the United States was held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in July 1993. Today, the IETF meets three times per
year and attendance has been as high as ca. 2,000 participants. Typically one in three IETF meetings are held in Europe or Asia. The number
of non-US attendees is typically ca. 50%, even at meetings held in the United States.[103]
The IETF is not a legal entity, has no governing board, no members, and no dues. The closest status resembling membership is being on an
IETF or Working Group mailing list. IETF volunteers come from all over the world and from many different parts of the Internet
community. The IETF works closely with and under the supervision of the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG)[105] and the Internet
Architecture Board (IAB).[106] The Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) and the Internet Research Steering Group (IRSG), peer activities to
the IETF and IESG under the general supervision of the IAB, focus on longer term research issues.[103][107]
Request for Comments
Request for Comments (RFCs) are the main documentation for the work of the IAB, IESG, IETF, and IRTF. RFC 1, "Host Software", was
written by Steve Crocker at UCLA in April 1969, well before the IETF was created. Originally they were technical memos documenting
aspects of ARPANET development and were edited by Jon Postel, the first RFC Editor.[103][108]
RFCs cover a wide range of information from proposed standards, draft standards, full standards, best practices, experimental protocols,
history, and other informational topics.[109] RFCs can be written by individuals or informal groups of individuals, but many are the product
of a more formal Working Group. Drafts are submitted to the IESG either by individuals or by the Working Group Chair. An RFC Editor,
appointed by the IAB, separate from IANA, and working in conjunction with the IESG, receives drafts from the IESG and edits, formats,
and publishes them. Once an RFC is published, it is never revised. If the standard it describes changes or its information becomes obsolete,
the revised standard or updated information will be re-published as a new RFC that "obsoletes" the original.[103][108]
The Internet Society
The Internet Society (ISOC) is an international, nonprofit organization founded during 1992 "to assure the open development, evolution and
use of the Internet for the benefit of all people throughout the world". With offices near Washington, DC, USA, and in Geneva, Switzerland,
ISOC has a membership base comprising more than 80 organizational and more than 50,000 individual members. Members also form
"chapters" based on either common geographical location or special interests. There are currently more than 90 chapters around the
world.[110]
ISOC provides financial and organizational support to and promotes the work of the standards settings bodies for which it is the
organizational home: the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), the Internet Engineering Steering
Group (IESG), and the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). ISOC also promotes understanding and appreciation of the Internet model of
open, transparent processes and consensus-based decision-making.[111]
13 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
Globalization and Internet governance in the 21st century
Since the 1990s, the Internet's governance and organization has been of global importance to governments, commerce, civil society, and
individuals. The organizations which held control of certain technical aspects of the Internet were the successors of the old ARPANET
oversight and the current decision-makers in the day-to-day technical aspects of the network. While recognized as the administrators of
certain aspects of the Internet, their roles and their decision-making authority are limited and subject to increasing international scrutiny and
increasing objections. These objections have led to the ICANN removing themselves from relationships with first the University of
Southern California in 2000,[112] and finally in September 2009, gaining autonomy from the US government by the ending of its
longstanding agreements, although some contractual obligations with the U.S. Department of Commerce continued.[113][114][115]
The IETF, with financial and organizational support from the Internet Society, continues to serve as the Internet's ad-hoc standards body and
issues Request for Comments.
In November 2005, the World Summit on the Information Society, held in Tunis, called for an Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to be
convened by United Nations Secretary General. The IGF opened an ongoing, non-binding conversation among stakeholders representing
governments, the private sector, civil society, and the technical and academic communities about the future of Internet governance. The first
IGF meeting was held in October/November 2006 with follow up meetings annually thereafter.[116] Since WSIS, the term "Internet
governance" has been broadened beyond narrow technical concerns to include a wider range of Internet-related policy issues.[117][118]
Politicization of the Internet

Due to its prominence and immediacy as an effective means of mass communication, the Internet has also become more politicized as it has
grown. This has led in turn, to discourses and activities that would once have taken place in other ways, migrating to being mediated by
internet.
Examples include political activities such as public protest and canvassing of support and votes, but also
The spreading of ideas and opinions;

Recruitment of followers, and "coming together" of members of the public, for ideas, products, and causes;
Providing and widely distributing and sharing information that might be deemed sensitive or relates to whistleblowing (and
efforts by specific countries to prevent this by censorship);
Criminal activity and terrorism (and resulting law enforcement use, together with its facilitation by mass surveillance).
Net neutrality
On April 23, 2014, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was reported to be considering a new rule that would permit Internet
service providers to offer content providers a faster track to send content, thus reversing their earlier net neutrality position.[119][120][121] A
possible solution to net neutrality concerns may be municipal broadband, according to Professor Susan Crawford, a legal and technology
expert at Harvard Law School.[122] On May 15, 2014, the FCC decided to consider two options regarding Internet services: first, permit fast
and slow broadband lanes, thereby compromising net neutrality; and second, reclassify broadband as a telecommunication service, thereby
preserving net neutrality.[123][124] On November 10, 2014, President Obama recommended the FCC reclassify broadband Internet service as
a telecommunications service in order to preserve net neutrality.[125][126][127] On January 16, 2015, Republicans presented legislation, in the
form of a U.S. Congress H. R. discussion draft bill, that makes concessions to net neutrality but prohibits the FCC from accomplishing the
goal or enacting any further regulation affecting Internet service providers (ISPs).[128][129] On January 31, 2015, AP News reported that the
FCC will present the notion of applying ("with some caveats") Title II (common carrier) of the Communications Act of 1934 to the internet
in a vote expected on February 26, 2015.[130][131][132][133][134] Adoption of this notion would reclassify internet service from one of
information to one of telecommunications[135] and, according to Tom Wheeler, chairman of the FCC, ensure net neutrality.[136][137] The
FCC is expected to enforce net neutrality in its vote, according to the New York Times.[138][139]
On February 26, 2015, the FCC ruled in favor of net neutrality by applying Title II (common carrier) of the Communications Act of 1934
and Section 706 of the Telecommunications act of 1996 to the Internet.[140][141][142] The FCC Chairman, Tom Wheeler, commented, "This
is no more a plan to regulate the Internet than the First Amendment is a plan to regulate free speech. They both stand for the same
concept."[143]
On March 12, 2015, the FCC released the specific details of the net neutrality rules.[144][145][146] On April 13, 2015, the FCC published the
final rule on its new "Net Neutrality" regulations.[147][148]
Use and culture
14 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
Email and Usenet
E-mail has often been called the killer application of the Internet. It predates the Internet, and was a crucial tool in creating it. Email started
in 1965 as a way for multiple users of a time-sharing mainframe computer to communicate. Although the history is undocumented, among
the first systems to have such a facility were the System Development Corporation (SDC) Q32 and the Compatible Time-Sharing System
(CTSS) at MIT.[149]
The ARPANET computer network made a large contribution to the evolution of electronic mail. An experimental inter-system transferred
mail on the ARPANET shortly after its creation.[150] In 1971 Ray Tomlinson created what was to become the standard Internet electronic
mail addressing format, using the @ sign to separate mailbox names from host names.[151]
A number of protocols were developed to deliver messages among groups of time-sharing computers over alternative transmission systems,
such as UUCP and IBM's VNET email system. Email could be passed this way between a number of networks, including ARPANET,
BITNET and NSFNET, as well as to hosts connected directly to other sites via UUCP. See the history of SMTP protocol.
In addition, UUCP allowed the publication of text files that could be read by many others. The News software developed by Steve Daniel
and Tom Truscott in 1979 was used to distribute news and bulletin board-like messages. This quickly grew into discussion groups, known
as newsgroups, on a wide range of topics. On ARPANET and NSFNET similar discussion groups would form via mailing lists, discussing
both technical issues and more culturally focused topics (such as science fiction, discussed on the sflovers (http://www.sflovers.org/)
mailing list).
During the early years of the Internet, email and similar mechanisms were also fundamental to allow people to access resources that were
not available due to the absence of online connectivity. UUCP was often used to distribute files using the 'alt.binary' groups. Also, FTP
e-mail gateways allowed people that lived outside the US and Europe to download files using ftp commands written inside email messages.
The file was encoded, broken in pieces and sent by email; the receiver had to reassemble and decode it later, and it was the only way for
people living overseas to download items such as the earlier Linux versions using the slow dial-up connections available at the time. After
the popularization of the Web and the HTTP protocol such tools were slowly abandoned.
From Gopher to the WWW
As the Internet grew through the 1980s and early 1990s, many people realized the increasing need to be able to find and organize files and
information. Projects such as Archie, Gopher, WAIS, and the FTP Archive list attempted to create ways to organize distributed data. In the
early 1990s, Gopher, invented by Mark P. McCahill offered a viable alternative to the World Wide Web. However, in 1993 the World Wide
Web saw many advances to indexing and ease of access through search engines, which often neglected Gopher and Gopherspace. As
popularity increased through ease of use, investment incentives also grew until in the middle of 1994 the WWW's popularity gained the
upper hand. Then it became clear that Gopher and the other projects were doomed fall short.[152]
One of the most promising user interface paradigms during this period was hypertext. The technology had been inspired by Vannevar Bush's
"Memex"[153] and developed through Ted Nelson's research on Project Xanadu and Douglas Engelbart's research on NLS.[154] Many small
self-contained hypertext systems had been created before, such as Apple Computer's HyperCard (1987). Gopher became the first commonly
used hypertext interface to the Internet. While Gopher menu items were examples of hypertext, they were not commonly perceived in that
way.
In 1989, while working at CERN, Tim Berners-Lee invented a network-based implementation of the
hypertext concept. By releasing his invention to public use, he ensured the technology would
become widespread.[155] For his work in developing the World Wide Web, Berners-Lee received the
Millennium technology prize in 2004.[156] One early popular web browser, modeled after
HyperCard, was ViolaWWW.
A turning point for the World Wide Web began with the introduction[157] of the Mosaic web
browser[158] in 1993, a graphical browser developed by a team at the National Center for
Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (NCSA-UIUC), led
by Marc Andreessen. Funding for Mosaic came from the High-Performance Computing and This NeXT Computer was used by
Communications Initiative, a funding program initiated by the High Performance Computing and Sir Tim Berners-Lee at CERN and
Communication Act of 1991 also known as the Gore Bill.[159] Mosaic's graphical interface soon became the world's first Web server.
became more popular than Gopher, which at the time was primarily text-based, and the WWW
became the preferred interface for accessing the Internet. (Gore's reference to his role in "creating
the Internet", however, was ridiculed in his presidential election campaign. See the full article Al Gore and information technology).
Mosaic was superseded in 1994 by Andreessen's Netscape Navigator, which replaced Mosaic as the world's most popular browser. While it
held this title for some time, eventually competition from Internet Explorer and a variety of other browsers almost completely displaced it.
Another important event held on January 11, 1994, was The Superhighway Summit at UCLA's Royce Hall. This was the "first public
15 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
conference bringing together all of the major industry, government and academic leaders in the field [and] also began the national dialogue
about the Information Superhighway and its implications."[160]
24 Hours in Cyberspace, "the largest one-day online event" (February 8, 1996) up to that date, took place on the then-active website,
cyber24.com.[161][162] It was headed by photographer Rick Smolan.[163] A photographic exhibition was unveiled at the Smithsonian
Institution's National Museum of American History on January 23, 1997, featuring 70 photos from the project.[164]
Search engines
Even before the World Wide Web, there were search engines that attempted to organize the Internet. The first of these was the Archie search
engine from McGill University in 1990, followed in 1991 by WAIS and Gopher. All three of those systems predated the invention of the
World Wide Web but all continued to index the Web and the rest of the Internet for several years after the Web appeared. There are still
Gopher servers as of 2006, although there are a great many more web servers.
As the Web grew, search engines and Web directories were created to track pages on the Web and allow people to find things. The first
full-text Web search engine was WebCrawler in 1994. Before WebCrawler, only Web page titles were searched. Another early search
engine, Lycos, was created in 1993 as a university project, and was the first to achieve commercial success. During the late 1990s, both Web
directories and Web search engines were popularYahoo! (founded 1994) and Altavista (founded 1995) were the respective industry
leaders. By August 2001, the directory model had begun to give way to search engines, tracking the rise of Google (founded 1998), which
had developed new approaches to relevancy ranking. Directory features, while still commonly available, became after-thoughts to search
engines.
Database size, which had been a significant marketing feature through the early 2000s, was similarly displaced by emphasis on relevancy
ranking, the methods by which search engines attempt to sort the best results first. Relevancy ranking first became a major issue circa 1996,
when it became apparent that it was impractical to review full lists of results. Consequently, algorithms for relevancy ranking have
continuously improved. Google's PageRank method for ordering the results has received the most press, but all major search engines
continually refine their ranking methodologies with a view toward improving the ordering of results. As of 2006, search engine rankings are
more important than ever, so much so that an industry has developed ("search engine optimizers", or "SEO") to help web-developers
improve their search ranking, and an entire body of case law has developed around matters that affect search engine rankings, such as use of
trademarks in metatags. The sale of search rankings by some search engines has also created controversy among librarians and consumer
advocates.[165]
On June 3, 2009, Microsoft launched its new search engine, Bing.[166] The following month Microsoft and Yahoo! announced a deal in
which Bing would power Yahoo! Search.[167]
File sharing
Resource or file sharing has been an important activity on computer networks from well before the Internet was established and was
supported in a variety of ways including bulletin board systems (1978), Usenet (1980), Kermit (1981), and many others. The File Transfer
Protocol (FTP) for use on the Internet was standardized in 1985 and is still in use today.[168] A variety of tools were developed to aid the use
of FTP by helping users discover files they might want to transfer, including the Wide Area Information Server (WAIS) in 1991, Gopher in
1991, Archie in 1991, Veronica in 1992, Jughead in 1993, Internet Relay Chat (IRC) in 1988, and eventually the World Wide Web (WWW)
in 1991 with Web directories and Web search engines.
In 1999, Napster became the first peer-to-peer file sharing system.[169] Napster used a central server for indexing and peer discovery, but the
storage and transfer of files was decentralized. A variety of peer-to-peer file sharing programs and services with different levels of
decentralization and anonymity followed, including: Gnutella, eDonkey2000, and Freenet in 2000, FastTrack, Kazaa, Limewire, and
BitTorrent in 2001, and Poisoned in 2003.[170]
All of these tools are general purpose and can be used to share a wide variety of content, but sharing of music files, software, and later
movies and videos are major uses.[171] And while some of this sharing is legal, large portions are not. Lawsuits and other legal actions
caused Napster in 2001, eDonkey2000 in 2005, Kazza in 2006, and Limewire in 2010 to shutdown or refocus their efforts.[172][173] The
Pirate Bay, founded in Sweden in 2003, continues despite a trial and appeal in 2009 and 2010 that resulted in jail terms and large fines for
several of its founders.[174] File sharing remains contentious and controversial with charges of theft of intellectual property on the one hand
and charges of censorship on the other.[175][176]
Dot-com bubble
Suddenly the low price of reaching millions worldwide, and the possibility of selling to or hearing from those people at the same moment
when they were reached, promised to overturn established business dogma in advertising, mail-order sales, customer relationship
management, and many more areas. The web was a new killer appit could bring together unrelated buyers and sellers in seamless and
16 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
low-cost ways. Entrepreneurs around the world developed new business models, and ran to their nearest venture capitalist. While some of
the new entrepreneurs had experience in business and economics, the majority were simply people with ideas, and did not manage the
capital influx prudently. Additionally, many dot-com business plans were predicated on the assumption that by using the Internet, they
would bypass the distribution channels of existing businesses and therefore not have to compete with them; when the established businesses
with strong existing brands developed their own Internet presence, these hopes were shattered, and the newcomers were left attempting to
break into markets dominated by larger, more established businesses. Many did not have the ability to do so.
The dot-com bubble burst in March 2000, with the technology heavy NASDAQ Composite index peaking at 5,048.62 on March 10[177]
(5,132.52 intraday), more than double its value just a year before. By 2001, the bubble's deflation was running full speed. A majority of the
dot-coms had ceased trading, after having burnt through their venture capital and IPO capital, often without ever making a profit. But
despite this, the Internet continues to grow, driven by commerce, ever greater amounts of online information and knowledge and social
networking.
Mobile phones and the Internet
The first mobile phone with Internet connectivity was the Nokia 9000 Communicator, launched in Finland in 1996. The viability of Internet
services access on mobile phones was limited until prices came down from that model, and network providers started to develop systems
and services conveniently accessible on phones. NTT DoCoMo in Japan launched the first mobile Internet service, i-mode, in 1999 and this
is considered the birth of the mobile phone Internet services. In 2001, the mobile phone email system by Research in Motion for their
BlackBerry product was launched in America. To make efficient use of the small screen and tiny keypad and one-handed operation typical
of mobile phones, a specific document and networking model was created for mobile devices, the Wireless Application Protocol (WAP).
Most mobile device Internet services operate using WAP. The growth of mobile phone services was initially a primarily Asian phenomenon
with Japan, South Korea and Taiwan all soon finding the majority of their Internet users accessing resources by phone rather than by PC.
Developing countries followed, with India, South Africa, Kenya, Philippines, and Pakistan all reporting that the majority of their domestic
users accessed the Internet from a mobile phone rather than a PC. The European and North American use of the Internet was influenced by
a large installed base of personal computers, and the growth of mobile phone Internet access was more gradual, but had reached national
penetration levels of 2030% in most Western countries.[178] The cross-over occurred in 2008, when more Internet access devices were
mobile phones than personal computers. In many parts of the developing world, the ratio is as much as 10 mobile phone users to one PC
user.[179]
Web technologies
Web pages were initially conceived as structured documents based upon Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) which can allow access to
images, video, and other content. Hyperlinks in the page permit users to navigate to other pages. In the earliest browsers, images opened in
a separate "helper" application. Marc Andreessen's 1993 Mosaic and 1994 Netscape[68] introduced mixed text and images for non-technical
users. HTML evolved during the 1990s, leading to HTML 4 which introduced large elements of CSS styling and, later, extensions to allow
browser code to make calls and ask for content from servers in a structured way (AJAX).
Historiography
There are nearly insurmountable problems in supplying a historiography of the Internet's development. The process of digitization
represents a twofold challenge both for historiography in general and, in particular, for historical communication research.[180] A sense of
the difficulty in documenting early developments that led to the internet can be gathered from the quote:
"The Arpanet period is somewhat well documented because the corporation in charge BBN left a physical record. Moving
into the NSFNET era, it became an extraordinarily decentralized process. The record exists in people's basements, in closets. ...
So much of what happened was done verbally and on the basis of individual trust."
Doug Gale (2007)[181]
See also
History of hypertext Nerds 2.0.1: A Brief History of the Internet
History of the Internet in Sweden On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog
History of the web browser Outline of the Internet
Index of Internet-related articles Internet activism
MH & xmh: Email for Users & Programmers Whistleblower
Net neutrality Internet censorship
17 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
References
1. Kim, Byung-Keun (2005). Internationalising the Internet the 25. The Merit Network, Inc. is an independent non-profit 501(c)(3)
Co-evolution of Influence and Technology. Edward Elgar. pp. 5155. corporation governed by Michigan's public universities. Merit
ISBN 1845426754. receives administrative services under an agreement with the
2. "Brief History of the Internet". Internet Society. Retrieved 9 April University of Michigan.
2016. "It happened that the work at MIT (1961-1967), at RAND 26. A Chronicle of Merit's Early History (http://www.merit.edu/about
(1962-1965), and at NPL (1964-1967) had all proceeded in parallel /history/article.php), John Mulcahy, 1989, Merit Network, Ann
without any of the researchers knowing about the other work. The Arbor, Michigan
word "packet" was adopted from the work at NPL" 27. Merit Network Timeline: 19701979 (http://www.merit.edu/about
3. "Turing's Legacy: A History of Computing at the National Physical /history/timeline_1970.php), Merit Network, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Laboratory 19451995" (https://books.google.co.uk 28. Merit Network Timeline: 19801989 (http://www.merit.edu/about
/books?id=ToMfAQAAIAAJ), David M. Yates, National Museum of /history/timeline_1980.php), Merit Network, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Science and Industry, 1997, pages 126146, ISBN 0901805947. 29. "A Technical History of CYCLADES". Technical Histories of the
Retrieved 19 May 2015. Internet & other Network Protocols. Computer Science Department,
4. "Data Communications at the National Physical Laboratory University of Texas Austin.
(19651975)" (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=& 30. "The Cyclades Experience: Results and Impacts"
arnumber=4640566&url=http%3A%2F (http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/ifip
%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D46 /ifip1977.html#Zimmermann77), Zimmermann, H., Proc. IFIP'77
40566), Martin Campbell-Kelly, IEEE Annals of the History of Congress, Toronto, August 1977, pp. 465469
Computing, Volume 9 Issue 34 (JulySept 1987), pages 221247. 31. tsbedh. "History of X.25, CCITT Plenary Assemblies and Book
Retrieved 18 May 2015. Colors". Itu.int. Retrieved June 5, 2009.
5. "The First ISP". Indra.com. 1992-08-13. Retrieved 2015-10-17. 32. "Events in British Telecomms History". Events in British
6. Couldry, Nick (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and TelecommsHistory. Archived from the original on April 5, 2003.
Digital Media Practice. London: Polity Press. p. 2. Retrieved November 25, 2005.
7. "The World's Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and 33. UUCP Internals Frequently Asked Questions (http://www.faqs.org
Compute Information" (http://www.sciencemag.org/content /faqs/uucp-internals/)
/332/6025/60), Martin Hilbert and Priscila Lpez (2011), Science 34. Barry M. Leiner, Vinton G. Cerf, David D. Clark, Robert E. Kahn,
(journal), 332(6025), 6065; free access to the article through here: Leonard Kleinrock, Daniel C. Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry G. Roberts,
martinhilbert.net/WorldInfoCapacity.html Stephen Wolff (2003). "A Brief History of Internet". Retrieved
8. J. C. R. Licklider (March 1960). "Man-Computer Symbiosis". IRE May 28, 2009.
Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics. HFE-1: 411. 35. "Computer History Museum and Web History Center Celebrate 30th
9. J. C. R. Licklider and Welden Clark (August 1962). "On-Line Anniversary of Internet Milestone". Retrieved November 22, 2007.
Man-Computer Communication" (PDF). AIEE-IRE '62 (Spring): 36. Ogg, Erica (2007-11-08). " 'Internet van' helped drive evolution of the
113128. Web". CNET. Retrieved 2011-11-12.
10. Licklider, J. C. R. (23 April 1963). "Topics for Discussion at the 37. Jon Postel, NCP/TCP Transition Plan, RFC 801
Forthcoming Meeting, Memorandum For: Members and Affiliates of 38. David Roessner; Barry Bozeman; Irwin Feller; Christopher Hill; Nils
the Intergalactic Computer Network". Washington, D.C.: Advanced Newman (1997). "The Role of NSF's Support of Engineering in
Research Projects Agency. Retrieved 2013-01-26. Enabling Technological Innovation". Retrieved May 28, 2009.
11. Robert Taylor in an interview with John Markoff (December 20, 39. "RFC 675 Specification of internet transmission control program".
1999). "An Internet Pioneer Ponders the Next Revolution". The New Tools.ietf.org. Retrieved May 28, 2009.
York Times. Retrieved November 25, 2005. 40. Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1996). Computer Networks. Prentice Hall.
12. "J.C.R. Licklider and the Universal Network". The Internet. 2000. ISBN 0-13-394248-1.
13. Baran, Paul (May 27, 1960). "Reliable Digital Communications 41. Hauben, Ronda (2004). "The Internet: On its International Origins
Using Unreliable Network Repeater Nodes" (PDF). The RAND and Collaborative Vision". Amateur Computerist. 12 (2). Retrieved
Corporation: 1. Retrieved July 25, 2012. May 29, 2009.
14. Ruthfield, Scott (September 1995). "The Internet's History and 42. "Internet Access Provider Lists". Retrieved May 10, 2012.
Development From Wartime Tool to the Fish-Cam". Crossroads. 2 43. "RFC 1871 CIDR and Classful Routing". Tools.ietf.org. Retrieved
(1). pp. 24. doi:10.1145/332198.332202. Archived from the original May 28, 2009.

on October 18, 2007. Retrieved April 1, 2016. 44. Ben Segal (1995). "A Short History of Internet Protocols at CERN".
15. "About Rand". Paul Baran and the Origins of the Internet. Retrieved 45. "A Brief History of the Internet in Korea (2005) -
July 25, 2012. ". sites.google.com. Retrieved 2016-05-30.
16. Strickland, Jonathan. "How ARPANET Works". 46. "Three decades since the introduction of the internet in Korea".
17. Gromov, Gregory (1995). "Roads and Crossroads of Internet world.kbs.co.kr. Retrieved 2016-05-30.
History". 47. "Internet History in Asia". 16th APAN Meetings/Advanced Network
18. Hafner, Katie (1998). Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins Of Conference in Busan. Retrieved December 25, 2005.
The Internet. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-83267-4. 48. "Percentage of Individuals using the Internet 20002012"
19. Ronda Hauben (2001). "From the ARPANET to the Internet". (http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics
Retrieved May 28, 2009. /2013/Individuals_Internet_2000-2012.xls), International
20. Postel, J. (November 1981). "The General Plan" (https://tools.ietf.org Telecommunications Union (Geneva), June 2013, retrieved 22 June
/html/rfc801#page-2). NCP/TCP transition plan (https://tools.ietf.org 2013
/html/rfc801). IETF. p. 2. RFC 801. https://tools.ietf.org 49. "Fixed (wired)-broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants 2012"
/html/rfc801#page-2. Retrieved February 1, 2011. (http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reporting
21. "NORSAR and the Internet". NORSAR. Retrieved June 5, 2009. /DynamicReportWizard.aspx), Dynamic Report, ITU ITC EYE,
22. Ward, Mark (October 29, 2009). "Celebrating 40 years of the net". International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved on 29 June 2013.
BBC News.
23. "Donald Davies". thocp.net.
24. "Donald Davies". internethalloffame.org.
18 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
50. "Active mobile-broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants 2012" 75. "Web 1.0 Revisited Too many stupid buttons"
(http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reporting (http://www.complexify.com/buttons/). Complexify.com. Archived
/DynamicReportWizard.aspx), Dynamic Report, ITU ITC EYE, (https://web.archive.org/web/20060216081719/http:
International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved on 29 June 2013. //www.complexify.com/buttons/) February 16, 2006, at the Wayback
51. "ICONS webpage". Icons.afrinic.net. Retrieved May 28, 2009. Machine.
52. Nepad, Eassy partnership ends in divorce (http://www.fmtech.co.za 76. "The Right Size of Software".
/?p=209),(South African) Financial Times FMTech, 2007 77. Graham, Paul (November 2005). "Web 2.0". Retrieved 2006-08-02.
53. "APRICOT webpage". Apricot.net. May 4, 2009. Retrieved May 28, "I first heard the phrase 'Web 2.0' in the name of the Web 2.0
2009. conference in 2004."
54. "A brief history of the Internet in China". China celebrates 10 years 78. O'Reilly, Tim (2005-09-30). "What Is Web 2.0". O'Reilly Network.
of being connected to the Internet. Retrieved December 25, 2005. Retrieved 2006-08-06.
55. "Internet host count history". Internet Systems Consortium. Retrieved 79. Strickland, Jonathan (2007-12-28). "How Web 2.0 Works".
May 16, 2012. computer.howstuffworks.com. Retrieved 2015-02-28.
56. "The World internet provider". Retrieved May 28, 2009. 80. DiNucci, Darcy (1999). "Fragmented Future" (PDF). Print. 53 (4): 32.
57. OGC-00-33R Department of Commerce: Relationship with the 81. Idehen, Kingsley. 2003. RSS: INJAN (It's not just about news). Blog.
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (PDF). Blog Data Space. August 21 OpenLinkSW.com
Government Accountability Office. July 7, 2000. p. 6. (http://www.openlinksw.com/dataspace/kidehen@openlinksw.com
58. Even after the appropriations act was amended in 1992 to give NSF /weblog/kidehen@openlinksw.com%27s%20BLOG
more flexibility with regard to commercial traffic, NSF never felt that %20%5B127%5D/241)
it could entirely do away with its Acceptable Use Policy and its 82. Idehen, Kingsley. 2003. Jeff Bezos Comments about Web Services.
restrictions on commercial traffic, see the response to Blog. Blog Data Space. September 25. OpenLinkSW.com
Recommendation 5 in NSF's response to the Inspector General's (http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/index.vspx?id=373)
review (a April 19, 1993 memo from Frederick Bernthal, Acting 83. Knorr, Eric. 2003. The year of Web services. CIO, December 15.
Director, to Linda Sundro, Inspector General, that is included at the 84. "John Robb's Weblog". Jrobb.mindplex.org. Archived from the
end of Review of NSFNET (http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/stis1993 original on May 16, 2008. Retrieved 2011-02-06.
/oig9301/oig9301.txt), Office of the Inspector General, National 85. O'Reilly, Tim, and John Battelle. 2004. Opening Welcome: State of
Science Foundation, March 23, 1993) the Internet Industry. In San Francisco, California, October 5.
59. Management of NSFNET (http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal 86. 031072208 (2005-10-01). "Web 2.0: Compact Definition".
/search Scholar.googleusercontent.com. Retrieved 2013-06-15.
/recordDetails.jsp?ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED350986& 87. Flew, Terry (2008). New Media: An Introduction (3rd ed.).
searchtype=keyword&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no& Melbourne: Oxford University Press. p. 19.
_pageLabel=RecordDetails&accno=ED350986&_nfls=false), a 88. "Twitter post". 2010-01-22. Archived from the original on
transcript of the March 12, 1992 hearing before the Subcommittee on 2013-03-10. Retrieved 2013-03-10.
Science of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. 89. NASA Extends the World Wide Web Out Into Space
House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, Second (http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/jan
Session, Hon. Rick Boucher, subcommittee chairman, presiding /HQ_M10-011_Hawaii221169.html). NASA media advisory
60. "Retiring the NSFNET Backbone Service: Chronicling the End of an M10-012, January 22, 2010. Archived (http://www.webcitation.org
Era" (http://merit.edu/research/nsfnet_article.php), Susan R. Harris, /5uaKVooin)
Ph.D., and Elise Gerich, ConneXions, Vol. 10, No. 4, April 1996 90. NASA Successfully Tests First Deep Space Internet
61. "A Brief History of the Internet". (http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/nov
62. NSF Solicitation 93-52 (http://w2.eff.org/Infrastructure/Govt_docs /HQ_08-298_Deep_space_internet.html). NASA media release
/nsf_nren.rfp) Network Access Point Manager, Routing Arbiter, 08-298, November 18, 2008 Archived (http://www.webcitation.org
Regional Network Providers, and Very High Speed Backbone /5uaKpKCGz)
Network Services Provider for NSFNET and the NREN(SM) 91. Disruption Tolerant Networking for Space Operations (DTN). July
Program, May 6, 1993 31, 2012 (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research
63. "What is the difference between the Web and the Internet?". W3C /experiments/DTN.html)
Help and FAQ. W3C. 2009. Retrieved 16 July 2015. 92. "Cerf: 2011 will be proving point for 'InterPlanetary Internet' ".
64. "World Wide Web Timeline". Pews Research Center. 11 March 2014. Network World interview with Vint Cerf. February 18, 2011. Archived
Retrieved 1 August 2015. from the original on December 9, 2012.
65. Dewey, Caitlin (12 March 2014). "36 Ways The Web Has Changed 93. "Internet Architecture". IAB Architectural Principles of the Internet.
Us". The Washington Post. Retrieved 1 August 2015. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
66. "Website Analytics Tool". Retrieved 1 August 2015. 94. "DDN NIC". IAB Recommended Policy on Distributing Internet
67. "Tim Berners-Lee: WorldWideWeb, the first Web client". W3.org. Identifier Assignment. Retrieved December 26, 2005.
68. "Frequently asked questions by the Press Tim BL". W3.org. 95. "GSI-Network Solutions". TRANSITION OF NIC SERVICES.
69. "Bloomberg Game Changers: Marc Andreessen". Bloomberg.com. 17 Retrieved December 26, 2005.
March 2011. 96. "Thomas v. NSI, Civ. No. 97-2412 (TFH), Sec. I.A. (DCDC April 6,
70. "Browser". Mashable. Retrieved 2 September 2011. 1998)". Lw.bna.com. Retrieved May 28, 2009.
71. Vetter, Ronald J. (October 1994). "Mosaic and the World-Wide Web" 97. "RFC 1366". Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space.
(PDF). North Dakota State University. Retrieved 20 November 2010. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
72. Berners-Lee, Tim. "What were the first WWW browsers?". World 98. "Development of the Regional Internet Registry System". Cisco.
Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 2010-06-15. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
73. Viswanathan, Ganesh; Dutt Mathur, Punit; Yammiyavar, Pradeep 99. "NIS Manager Award Announced". NSF Network information
(March 2010). "From Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 and beyond: Reviewing services awards. Retrieved December 25, 2005.
usability heuristic criteria taking music sites as case studies". 100. "Internet Moves Toward Privatization". http://www.nsf.gov. 24 June
IndiaHCI Conference. Mumbai. Retrieved 20 February 2015. 1997. External link in |work= (help)
74. Web 1.0 defined How stuff works 101. "RFC 2860". Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the
(http://computer.howstuffworks.com/web-101.htm) Technical Work of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.
Retrieved December 26, 2005.
102. "ICANN Bylaws". Retrieved April 10, 2012.
19 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
103. "The Tao of IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task 129. Staff (January 16, 2015). "H. R. _ 114th Congress, 1st Session
Force", FYI 17 and RFC 4677, P. Hoffman and S. Harris, Internet [Discussion Draft] To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to
Society, September 2006 ensure Internet openness..." (PDF). U. S. Congress. Retrieved
104. "A Mission Statement for the IETF", H. Alvestrand, Internet Society, January 20, 2015.
BCP 95 and RFC 3935, October 2004 130. Lohr, Steve (February 2, 2015). "In Net Neutrality Push, F.C.C. Is
105. "An IESG charter", H. Alvestrand, RFC 3710, Internet Society, Expected to Propose Regulating Internet Service as a Utility". New
February 2004 York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
106. "Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)", B. Carpenter, 131. Lohr, Steve (February 2, 2015). "F.C.C. Chief Wants to Override
BCP 39 and RFC 2850, Internet Society, May 2000 State Laws Curbing Community Net Services". New York Times.
107. "IAB Thoughts on the Role of the Internet Research Task Force Retrieved February 2, 2015.
(IRTF)", S. Floyd, V. Paxson, A. Falk (eds), RFC 4440, Internet 132. Flaherty, Anne (January 31, 2015). "Just whose Internet is it? New
Society, March 2006 federal rules may answer that". Associated Press. Retrieved
108. "The RFC Series and RFC Editor", L. Daigle, RFC 4844, Internet January 31, 2015.
Society, July 2007 133. Fung, Brian (January 2, 2015). "Get ready: The FCC says it will vote
109. "Not All RFCs are Standards", C. Huitema, J. Postel, S. Crocker, on net neutrality in February". Washington Post. Retrieved January 2,
RFC 1796, Internet Society, April 1995 2015.
110. Internet Society (ISOC) Introduction to ISOC (http://www.isoc.org 134. Staff (January 2, 2015). "FCC to vote next month on net neutrality
/isoc/) rules". Associated Press. Retrieved January 2, 2015.
111. Internet Society (ISOC) ISOC's Standards Activities 135. Lohr, Steve (February 4, 2015). "F.C.C. Plans Strong Hand to
(http://www.isoc.org/standards/) Regulate the Internet". New York Times. Retrieved February 5, 2015.
112. USC/ICANN Transition Agreement (http://www.icann.org/en/general 136. Wheeler, Tom (February 4, 2015). "FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler:
/usc-icann-transition-agreement.htm) This Is How We Will Ensure Net Neutrality". Wired (magazine).
113. ICANN cuts cord to US government, gets broader oversight: ICANN, Retrieved February 5, 2015.
which oversees the Internet's domain name system, is a private 137. The Editorial Board (February 6, 2015). "Courage and Good Sense at
nonprofit that reports to the US Department of Commerce. Under a the F.C.C. Net Neutrality's Wise New Rules". New York Times.
new agreement, that relationship will change, and ICANN's Retrieved February 6, 2015.
accountability goes global (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy 138. Weisman, Jonathan (February 24, 2015). "As Republicans Concede,
/news/2009/09/icann-cuts-cord-to-us-government-gets-broader- F.C.C. Is Expected to Enforce Net Neutrality". New York Times.
oversight.ars) Nate Anderson, September 30, 2009 Retrieved February 24, 2015.
114. Rhoads, Christopher (October 2, 2009). "U.S. Eases Grip Over Web 139. Lohr, Steve (February 25, 2015). "The Push for Net Neutrality Arose
Body: Move Addresses Criticisms as Internet Usage Becomes More From Lack of Choice". New York Times. Retrieved February 25,
Global". The Wall Street Journal. 2015.
115. Rabkin, Jeremy; Eisenach, Jeffrey (October 2, 2009). "The U.S. 140. Staff (February 26, 2015). "FCC Adopts Strong, Sustainable Rules
Abandons the Internet: Multilateral governance of the domain name To Protect The Open Internet" (PDF). Federal Communications
system risks censorship and repression". The Wall Street Journal. Commission. Retrieved February 26, 2015.
116. Mueller, Milton L. (2010). Networks and States: The Global Politics 141. Ruiz, Rebecca R.; Lohr, Steve (February 26, 2015). "In Net
of Internet Governance. MIT Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0-262-01459-5. Neutrality Victory, F.C.C. Classifies Broadband Internet Service as a
117. Mueller, Milton L. (2010). Networks and States: The Global Politics Public Utility". New York Times. Retrieved February 26, 2015.
of Internet Governance. MIT Press. pp. 7980. 142. Flaherty, Anne (February 25, 2015). "FACT CHECK: Talking heads
ISBN 978-0-262-01459-5. skew 'net neutrality' debate". Associated Press. Retrieved
118. DeNardis, Laura, The Emerging Field of Internet Governance February 26, 2015.
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1678343) (September 17, 2010). Yale 143. Liebelson, Dana (February 26, 2015). "Net Neutrality Prevails In
Information Society Project Working Paper Series. Historic FCC Vote". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 27,
119. Wyatt, Edward (April 23, 2014). "F.C.C., in 'Net Neutrality' 2015.
Turnaround, Plans to Allow Fast Lane". New York Times. Retrieved 144. Ruiz, Rebecca R. (March 12, 2015). "F.C.C. Sets Net Neutrality
2014-04-23. Rules". New York Times. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
120. Staff (April 24, 2014). "Creating a Two-Speed Internet". New York 145. Sommer, Jeff (March 12, 2015). "What the Net Neutrality Rules
Times. Retrieved 2014-04-25. Say". New York Times. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
121. Carr, David (May 11, 2014). "Warnings Along F.C.C.'s Fast Lane". 146. FCC Staff (March 12, 2015). "Federal Communications Commission
New York Times. Retrieved 2014-05-11. FCC 1524 In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open
122. Crawford, Susan (April 28, 2014). "The Wire Next Time". New York Internet GN Docket No. 14-28 Report and Order on Remand,
Times. Retrieved 2014-04-28. Declaratory Ruling, and Order" (PDF). Federal Communications
123. Staff (May 15, 2014). "Searching for Fairness on the Internet". New Commission. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
York Times. Retrieved 2014-05-15. 147. Reisinger, Don (April 13, 2015). "Net neutrality rules get published
124. Wyatt, Edward (May 15, 2014). "F.C.C. Backs Opening Net Rules let the lawsuits begin". CNET. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
for Debate". New York Times. Retrieved 2014-05-15. 148. Federal Communications Commission (April 13, 2015). "Protecting
125. Wyatt, Edward (November 10, 2014). "Obama Asks F.C.C. to Adopt and Promoting the Open Internet A Rule by the Federal
Tough Net Neutrality Rules". New York Times. Retrieved Communications Commission on 04/13/2015". Federal Register.
November 15, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
126. NYT Editorial Board (November 14, 2014). "Why the F.C.C. Should 149. "The Risks Digest". Great moments in e-mail history. Retrieved
Heed President Obama on Internet Regulation". New York Times. April 27, 2006.
Retrieved November 15, 2014. 150. "The History of Electronic Mail". The History of Electronic Mail.
127. Sepulveda, Ambassador Daniel A. (January 21, 2015). "The World Is Retrieved December 23, 2005.
Watching Our Net Neutrality Debate, So Let's Get It Right". Wired 151. "The First Network Email". The First Network Email. Retrieved
(website). Retrieved January 20, 2015. December 23, 2005.
128. Weisman, Jonathan (January 19, 2015). "Shifting Politics of Net 152. "Where Have all the Gophers Gone? Why the Web beat Gopher in
Neutrality Debate Ahead of F.C.C. Vote". New York Times. Retrieved the Battle for Protocol Mind Share". Ils.unc.edu. Retrieved
January 20, 2015. 2015-10-17.
20 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
153. Bush, Vannevar (1945). "As We May Think". Retrieved May 28, 168. RFC 765: File Transfer Protocol (FTP) (http://www.ietf.org
2009. /rfc/rfc0959.txt), J. Postel and J. Reynolds, ISI, October 1985
154. Douglas Engelbart (1962). "Augmenting Human Intellect: A 169. Kenneth P. Birman (2005-03-25). Reliable Distributed Systems:
Conceptual Framework". Technologies, Web Services, and Applications. Springer-Verlag New
155. "The Early World Wide Web at SLAC". The Early World Wide Web York Incorporated. ISBN 9780387215099. Retrieved 2012-01-20.
at SLAC: Documentation of the Early Web at SLAC. Retrieved 170. Menta, Richard (July 20, 2001). "Napster Clones Crush Napster. Take
November 25, 2005. 6 out of the Top 10 Downloads on CNet". MP3 Newswire.
156. "Millennium Technology Prize 2004 awarded to inventor of World 171. Movie File-Sharing Booming: Study (http://www.srgnet.com
Wide Web". Millennium Technology Prize. Archived from the /pdf/Movie%20File-
original on August 30, 2007. Retrieved May 25, 2008. Sharing%20Booming%20Release%20Jan%2024%2007%20Final.pdf
157. "Mosaic Web Browser History NCSA, Marc Andreessen, Eric ), Solutions Research Group, Toronto, 24 January 2006
Bina". Livinginternet.com. Retrieved May 28, 2009. 172. Menta, Richard (December 9, 1999). "RIAA Sues Music Startup
158. "NCSA Mosaic September 10, 1993 Demo". Totic.org. Retrieved Napster for $20 Billion". MP3 Newswire.
May 28, 2009. 173. "EFF: What Peer-to-Peer Developers Need to Know about Copyright
159. "Vice President Al Gore's ENIAC Anniversary Speech". Law". W2.eff.org. Retrieved 2012-01-20.
Cs.washington.edu. February 14, 1996. Retrieved May 28, 2009. 174. Kobie, Nicole (November 26, 2010). "Pirate Bay trio lose appeal
160. "UCLA Center for Communication Policy". Digitalcenter.org. against jail sentences". pcpro.co.uk. PCPRO. Retrieved
Retrieved May 28, 2009. November 26, 2010.
161. Mirror of Official site map (http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu 175. "Poll: Young Say File Sharing OK" (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories
/homepages/virtualopera/cyber24/SITE/htm3/site.htm) Archived /2003/09/18/opinion/polls/main573990.shtml), Bootie Cosgrove-
(https://web.archive.org/web/20090221023658/http: Mather, CBS News, 11 February 2009
//undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/virtualopera/cyber24 176. Green, Stuart P. (29 March 2012). "OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR; When
/SITE/htm3/site.htm) February 21, 2009, at the Wayback Machine. Stealing Isn't Stealing". The New York Times. p. 27.
162. Mirror of Official Site (http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages 177. Nasdaq peak of 5,048.62 (http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com
/virtualopera/cyber24/SITE/htm3/toc.htm?new) Archived /historical/default.asp?detect=1&symbol=NASDAQ&
(https://web.archive.org/web/20081222030955/http: close_date=3%2F10%2F00&x=34&y=12)
//undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/virtualopera/cyber24 178. Susmita Dasgupta; Somik V. Lall; David Wheeler (2001). Policy
/SITE/htm3/toc.htm?new) December 22, 2008, at the Wayback Reform, Economic Growth, and the Digital Divide: An Econometric
Machine. Analysis. World Bank Publications. pp. 13.
163. "24 Hours in Cyberspace (and more)". Baychi.org. Retrieved GGKEY:YLS5GEUEBAR. Retrieved 11 February 2013.
May 28, 2009. 179. Hillebrand, Friedhelm (2002). Hillebrand, Friedhelm, ed. GSM and
164. "The human face of cyberspace, painted in random images". UMTS, The Creation of Global Mobile Communications. John Wiley
Archive.southcoasttoday.com. Retrieved May 28, 2009. & Sons. ISBN 0-470-84322-5.
165. Stross, Randall (22 September 2009). Planet Google: One 180. Christoph Classen, Susanne Kinnebrock & Maria Lblich (Eds.):
Company's Audacious Plan to Organize Everything We Know. Simon Towards Web History: Sources, Methods, and Challenges in the
and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4165-4696-2. Retrieved 9 December 2012. Digital Age (http://www.gesis.org/en/hsr/current-issues/current-
166. "Microsoft's New Search at Bing.com Helps People Make Better issues-2011-2013/374-the-economie-des-conventions/). In Historical
Decisions: Decision Engine goes beyond search to help customers Social Research 37 (4): 97188. 2012.
deal with information overload (Press Release)". Microsoft News 181. Barras, Colin (August 23, 2007). "An Internet Pioneer Ponders the
Center. May 28, 2009. Retrieved May 29, 2009. Next Revolution". Illuminating the net's Dark Ages. Retrieved
167. "Microsoft and Yahoo seal web deal" (http://news.bbc.co.uk February 26, 2008.
/1/hi/business/8174763.stm), BBC Mobile News, July 29, 2009.
Further reading
Abbate, Janet (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262011723.
Cerf, Vinton (1993). How the Internet Came to Be.
Ryan, Johnny (2010). A history of the Internet and the digital future. London, England: Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1861897770.
Thomas Greene; Larry James Landweber; George Strawn (2003). "A Brief History of NSF and the Internet". National Science
Foundation.
External links
Internet History Timeline (http://www.computerhistory.org/exhibits/internet_history/) Computer History Museum
Histories of the Internet (http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/) Internet Society
Hobbes' Internet Timeline 12 (http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/)
History of the Internet (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hIQjrMHTv4), a short animated film (2009)
History of the Internet (https://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/History/) at DMOZ
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Internet&oldid=735317555"
Categories: American inventions History of the Internet Internet governance
21 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
This page was last modified on 19 August 2016, at 22:47.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you
agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.
22 of 22 8/25/2016 12:29 AM
Escaping the UNIX1 Tar Pit

Producing CD-ROMs in the UNIX Environment
Authored & Published in January of 1991
Stan J. Caterbone
Director of CD-ROM Technologies for American Helix Technology
Director of Advanced Media Group, Ltd.
1857 Colonial Village Lane
Lancaster, PA 17601.
Phone: (800) 525-6575
Fax: (717) 392-7897
John S. Garofolo
Computer Scientist
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Technology Building,
Room A-216
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Phone: (301) 975-3193
Email: john@ssi.ncsl.nist.gov
UNIX is a trademark of American Telephone and Telegraph, Inc. (AT&T). 2Disclaimer: Certain trade names and company products are
mentioned in the text in order to adequately specify procedures and equipment used. In no case does such identification imply
recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the products are
necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Just when things are going smoothly, and we begin to feel a little too comfortable and too
confident with CD-ROM technology, someone or something puts us in our place -- and
thankfully so. It's these challenges that facilitate our progress toward broadening the horizons
of CD-ROM technologies.
This article is intended to inform publishers and manufacturers of the problems that can be
encountered in using UNIX tar-formatted files as a medium of data submission for CD-ROM
production and some of the issues confronting the next generation of CD-ROM publishers.
Databases developed on non-DOS-based3 systems which have performance requirements that
exceed MS-DOS capabilities are becoming more commonplace. Ironically, the existing CD-ROM
production infrastructure has been created and supported primarily by DOS-based systems.
Although we are making progress in publishing data on other platforms, a large majority of
the CD-ROMs published today are still designed on DOS machines for use on DOS machines.
The current tendency to link CD-ROM with DOS is making difficult the implementation of CD-
ROM technology on non-DOS systems and, therefore, slowing its widespread acceptance.
3DOS is a trademark of the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and MS-DOS is
a trademark of the Microsoft Corporation.
The ensuing paragraphs illustrate the need for the CD-ROM industry become more in tune with
the trends which are shaping information technologies. CD-ROM, which is one such
information technology, is beginning to recruit a new breed of both users and publishers,
which are hoping that CD-ROM will adapt to them, as opposed to them having to adapt to it.
The Automated Speech Recognition Group of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) is one such CD-ROM publisher.
The NIST Automated Speech Recognition Group

Sponsored in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Information Science
and Technology Office (DARPA-ISTO), the group designs and implements methods of
performance evaluation for spoken language systems. These systems consist of natural
language understanding as well as speech recognition components. Additionally, it distributes
databases, or corpora, of speech recordings as standard reference material for the
development and evaluation of these systems.
Traditionally, these speech corpora have been recorded and stored in a digital form rather than
in an analog audio format. This allows the data to be easily loaded, stored, and manipulated in
computers and prevents signal degradation in copies. The speech is digitized at a sampling
rate of between 10 and 20 kHz., as opposed to the 44.1 kHz. sampling rate used in CD-audio.
Digitizing speech at these sampling frequencies keeps intact the properties of the speech
signal that are important for automatic speech recognition while minimizing storage
requirements. These corpora typically consist of thousands of spoken phrases or sentences
which are stored in separate files for ease of computer manipulation.
In the mid 1980's, the NIST began an archival/lending library for public domain speech
corpora. The corpora were originally maintained and distributed on half-inch reel-to-reel digital
magnetic computer tapes. Initially, these corpora were small, but as recognition systems
became more sophisticated, their appetite for "training" data grew tremendously. By the end
of the decade these corpora were each occupying 50 or more 6250 bpi. half-inch magnetic
tapes and even larger databases were on the horizon. Managing these colossal databases of
speech had become a real problem. Simply storing, copying, and distributing the corpora had
become unwieldy. Furthermore, maintaining the integrity of the corpora was even more
difficult as tapes were frequently damaged in shipment or by rogue tape drives.
NIST and CD-ROM

By early 1988, the NIST Automated Speech Recognition Group had begun investigating optical
disk storage technologies as a means of replacing its tape archives. Initially, Write-Once Read-
Many (WORM) technology was considered for use as a universal distribution medium but was
found to lack adequate standardization. Fortunately, in the Spring of 1988, the ISO-9660 file
format standard for CD-ROM was adopted and CD-ROM was chosen by NIST as a new
"experimental" medium for distributing speech corpora.
NIST decided that the first corpus to be produced on CD-ROM would be the DARPA "TIMIT"
Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus. Under DARPA sponsorship, TIMIT was jointly
designed, recorded, transcribed, and archived by Texas Instruments (TI) , the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT), SRI International, and the National Bureau of Standards (now
NIST). The TIMIT corpus was designed to provide speech data for the acquisition of
acousticphonetic knowledge and for the development and evaluation of automatic speech
recognition systems. The corpus contains recordings of 630 speakers from 8 major dialect
divisions of American English each speaking 10 phonetically-rich sentences. In addition to
standard orthographic (text) transcriptions, TIMIT contains unique time-aligned phonetic
transcriptions.
NIST felt that TIMIT's unique structure would be of great interest to speech researchers and,
therefore, would probably be ideal for widespread publication on CD-ROM. NIST decided to
publish two-thirds of the corpus on a "prototype" CD-ROM. Because of the ISO-9660
restrictions on filename length and format, the chosen two-thirds of the corpus to be placed
on CD-ROM was restructured from a flat directory structure with lengthy unique UNIX
filenames into a dense 5-level directory hierarchy, which reflected the design of the corpus and
conformed to ISO-9660. The resulting directory structure contained 4200 bottom-level
subdirectories -- one for each sentence-utterance, and 3 files per utterance for a total of
12,600 data files! This new organization required the use of the entire path and filename to
uniquely identify a file but was "visually navigable."
To date, more than 200 "TIMIT Prototype" discs have been distributed to universities and
speech research laboratories worldwide. The discs were well received by the speech research
community and have been read on PC's, Macintoshes4, various UNIX systems, NeXT5
machines and MicroVAXes6. The "experiment" had proved to be successful.
As of this writing, NIST has produced four releases of speech corpora on eight discs. Recently,
NIST completed production of its most ambitious speech disc so far. The new disc is a
complete revision of the TIMIT Prototype disc and contains the speech for the complete 630-
speaker corpus as well as all-new time aligned word-boundary transcriptions. The new TIMIT
CD-ROM contains 25,200 data files (4 files per utterance) as well as more extensive
documentation and software utilities.
After the production of the TIMIT prototype disc, NIST recognized the need to distribute
speech 4Macintosh is a trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. 5NeXT is a trademark of NeXT, Inc.
corpora in a consistent format. Unfortunately, no standard file format existed for storing and
exchanging speech signals. Compounding this problem, almost every speech research
laboratory around the world used different hardware and software configurations for speech
signal processing and analysis.
A UNIX-Based CD-ROM Preparation Workstation

In order to implement a full scale CD-ROM production effort, the Automated Speech
Recognition Group built a UNIX-based CD-ROM publishing workstation, which also doubles as a
general-purpose speech research system. CD-ROM images are prepared on a Sun
Microsystems server system with 32 megabytes of main memory, 3 gigabytes of high-speed
magnetic disc storage, a 9- track tape drive, an 8mm tape drive, and of course a CD-ROM
drive. The workstation contains two 1.2 gigabyte magnetic disc drives on which entire CD-
ROM images can be assembled and simulated.
Each CD-ROM is now organized entirely in the UNIX environment. Many of the standard UNIX
utilities and capabilities have proven ideal tools for CD-ROM preparation. Tar files are now
submitted for CD-ROM replication on one 8mm tape, instead of 5 or 6 half-inch reel-to-reel
tapes.
UNIX-based CD-ROM premastering software is planned to be added in the near future to help
alleviate some of the complications NIST has experienced in submitting data for replication. By
performing ISO-9660 formatting in house, an ISO-9660 image can be submitted to the
replication facility. The ISO-9660 image can then be directly loaded into a mastering system
thus circumventing the problems which can occur downloading tar-formatted files.
NIST has developed strategies to maximize the portability of its CD-ROMs by organizing
speech data into a consistent format and providing utilities which can be linked into each
laboratory's unique hardware and software systems. To accomplish this, a flexible, object-
oriented header structure was developed for the exchange of speech files, especially on CD-
ROM. The header is an ASCII-based structure prepended to each speech file and allows an
utterance to be uniquely identified (even if the file is copied from CD-ROM and inadvertently
renamed) and describes basic attributes of the speech signal to aid in digital to analog
operations. A set of software utilities have been written, "Speech Header Resources"
(SPHERE), to provide a low-level interface for importing and manipulating these files. NIST
now publishes all speech data in this more consistent format.
A Data Submission Problem

All of the key components for efficient CD-ROM production were in place at NIST, except for a
vehicle for data submission. When NIST initially delved into the world of CD-ROM production,
it was dismayed to learn that most CD-ROM replication facilities accepted only standard ANSI
labeled or ISO-9660 imaged tapes as transfer media. The small Automated Speech
Recognition Group could not justify the expense of purchasing a special-purpose premastering
workstation dedicated to creating ISO-9660 tapes. Neither could NIST provide standard ANSI-
labeled tapes because the simple structure of ANSI-formatted files would not preserve the
extensive directory structure required by the many files typically contained in speech corpora.
The UNIX tar Answer?

The tar-formatted tape is the standard medium of data exchange in the UNIX world and NIST
had been successfully distributing speech corpora on "tar tapes" for several years. The UNIX
tar (Tape Archive) utility was designed to create a portable archive format for UNIX files. The
tar program generates a single file (usually on magnetic tape) which contains all of the
information necessary for reconstituting directories, files, and UNIX-specific file parameters.
What distinguishes the tar utility from most other archive programs is that the archive format
it creates is portable across machines and operating systems. The key to the tar format's
portability is in its simplicity. Tar does not employ any elaborate compression algorithms when
generating an archive. It simply creates a byte-for-byte copy of each file to be archived with a
prepended header block. The header block contains the path and name of the file (or
directory), the file size, the time of last modification, and UNIX ownership and permission
flags. Because the information in the each header block as well as the file itself is byte-
encoded, the tar file can be read by any system which can recognize a stream of bytes. Of
course, binary executable files are system-specific and cannot usually be implemented on
differing systems. But text, source code, and binary data files can be easily exchanged.
To date, the tar program has been ported to many operating systems, including MS-DOS and
VMS8 as well as the many variants of UNIX. Because the tar format is portable and preserves
directory hierarchy, and because a tar file can be written to a standard ANSI-labeled tape or
any other storage medium, NIST concluded that tar formatted ANSI tapes would be the ideal
vehicle for providing a CD-ROM-ready file image to a replication plant. Unfortunately, NIST has
found that most replication plants either refuse to accept tar-formatted files or they charge
considerable "data conversion" fees to download the files into their premastering systems. To
say the least, the acceptance of tar as an input medium for CD-ROM production has been less
than universal by the CD-ROM replication industry. The replication facilities that have ventured
into the "tar pit" with NIST have frequently encountered technical delays and cost overruns. In
theory, the tar-tape to CD-ROM process should be simple.
But in reality, it has rarely been straightforward to implement. Pitfalls in Extracting a CD-ROM
Image from a UNIX tar File The challenges encountered in producing a CD-ROM from a 630-
megabyte tar tape, which contains over 25,000 files, can at first seem insurmountable.
Several problems have occurred during production, some of which are still not completely
resolved. Downloading and extracting a CD-ROM image from a tar file can be excruciatingly
slow, taking 15 or more machine hours of time for a single disc image. If a tar file is packed
with thousands of files, unforeseen complications can arise in the extraction process, and
diagnosing and troubleshooting all of the subsystems involved can become painful for even the
most experienced of engineers and technicians.
Extracting the file structure from a tar file for a CD-ROM such as the new TIMIT disc requires a
great deal of time and attention because of the extraordinary number of directories and files.
The subsystems involved in the tar extraction process require seamless integration. These
include the PC hardware platform and MS-DOS operating system, the premastering system,
the device drivers, controller cards, tape back-up systems, and the tar utility. Limitations
inherent in the MS-DOS operating system, device drivers, and file structures can result in
breakdowns in any one of these subsystems resulting in the loss of hours of man and machine
time in the production process.
Eight-mm tape subsystems can be especially vulnerable when extracting exceedingly large
numbers of files. This is because 8mm tape drives are mechanically suited for streaming
operations. They are not as accommodating as 9-track tape drives in the quick stopping and
starting movements, which become necessary when extracting many thousands of small files.
Additional loss of efficiency occurs when 8mm drives must interface with a system, which has
become bogged-down with overloaded magnetic disk sub-systems. The only way to optimize
their operation is to load and buffer large blocks of raw data before it is tar-extracted. Subtle
problems may also arise when the controller cards of some 8mm tape systems are not entirely
compatible with the publishing system being used. These and other unforeseen problems can
cause a tape drive to abort operations well before completion of the extraction process. Worse
yet, because the tar format does not guarantee that directories and files are stored in any
particular order, an entire tar file must be scanned to extract any subset of files contained in
it. If the tar-extraction process aborts before the end of the tar file is reached, the entire
process must be restarted from the beginning to insure that all files are loaded. These
constraints require that special efforts be taken to prepare backup tapes and even second
backup tapes during production. This is one area of risk where the insurance is well worth the
effort, and is within one's control. Many of the other pitfalls are not as easy to anticipate or
avoid.
One of the more frustrating problems encountered while downloading the TIMIT tar file was
that of the overhead created while extracting the 18,900 small transcription files. To illustrate
this point, during the downloading of the 632-megabyte tar file, containing the 25,241 TIMIT
files, the process aborted on 650-, 850-, and 1200-megabyte partitions due to insufficient disc
space!
On UNIX systems, the size of file blocks (similar to the ISO-9660 and DOS sector structures)
can be modified. Although the ISO-9660 standard supports different sector sizes, the
individual operating systems used in the premastering process may present problems. For
example, MS-DOS 3.31 does not allow any modifications to sector size. Fortunately, MS-DOS
4.0 is more forgiving.
The TIMIT tar file contained 18,900 transcription files of under 2Kb each. A premastering
system running DOS 3.31 with a 16Kb sector size would require over 300 megabytes of disk
storage for these files, which actually amount to less than 32 megabytes of data. This results
in disk overhead of 1 order of magnitude! However, by switching to DOS 4.0, the sector size
can be reduced to as little as 512 bytes. This significantly reduces the overhead being used by
the DOS partition. It is therefore important to adjust the sector size to accommodate the size
of the database files to be downloaded. To maximize disk usage, the sector size should be set
high when premastering a database with a few large textual files. But when a database (such
as TIMIT) contains many small files, the sector size should be greatly reduced. Likewise, it is
also important to allow for this kind of overhead on the CD-ROM itself. Although CD-ROMs are
generally created with a 2Kb sector size, the sector size can be reduced on the ISO-9660
image in the premastering phase to as little as 512 bytes. By decreasing the sector size on the
TIMIT ISO-9660 image to 512 bytes, potential disc overhead was reduced by about 32
megabytes.
Finally, a hidden source of potential problems lies within the implementation of the utility used
to extract the tar file. There are currently a number of tar utilities that have been written and
are in use today. Many of these utilities are suboptimal in speed and efficiency. The time
required for downloading a tar file can become critical when extracting large numbers of files.
Therefore, using the right tar implementation is a must.
The Real "Tar Pit" -- Universal Operability

The real problem facing the CD-ROM industry concerning the production of non-DOS-based
discs lies not in which utilities or platforms to use, but within the deeper abyss of universal
operability. Universal operability encompasses the common methodology of transferring,
publishing, and retrieving many different types of data across different platforms, while using
different hardware and software systems. Attempting to extract a tar file into a DOS-based
premastering system is a perfect example of why universal operability is the next technical
challenge for the CD-ROM industry at large. If this issue is continued to be ignored, entire
market segments will be left paralyzed because of the inability to publish information from
beginning to end without experiencing compatibility problems. This bleak scenario could result
in the CD-ROM industry losing the acceptance and respect it has worked hard to gain.
The Challenge Ahead

This article has illustrated some of the potential problems, which can result when using the
UNIX tar format as a data submission medium for CD-ROM replication. More importantly, it
has shown that a much greater variety of CD-ROM applications could blossom if the CD-ROM
industry embraces a diversification of CD-ROM platforms. The ISO-9660 standard has
provided a good basis for the exchange of CD-ROMs across different hardware and software
platforms. It is now time for the CD-ROM industry to address and overcome the many
obstacles faced by the challenge of universal operability. The increasing need for a standard
media- and platform-independent format for data submission is just one such obstacle. In the
short term, manufacturers of CD-ROM premastering workstations should publish specifications
indicating the limitations of their systems. This would allow publishers and replicators of
"atypical" CD-ROMs to avoid many of unforeseen pitfalls they must now face. In the long term,
these premastering systems must be made more robust.
The next generation of CD-ROM publishers and users will help CD-ROM technology reach new
heights, but they will become far less forgiving as CD-ROM becomes more commonplace. For
NIST, the UNIX road to CD-ROM has certainly been "the road less traveled." Currently, the
development, production, and use of CD-ROM technology in UNIX and other environments is
still in its infancy. However, by increasing support for development and production in these
environments, CD-ROMs may someday be produced and used on a variety of platforms as
easily as they are on MS-DOS-based systems today. It is only in this way that the CD-ROM will
become the truly universal medium of data exchange that it was intended to be.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the following people which have helped them in their quest for
solutions to the problems this article has outlined: Joe Bradley and Clayton Summers at Philips
and Dupont 10Helgerson, L. W., "Universal Operability: The Technical Solution", Disc
Magazine, pp. 36-39, October 1990. Optical Co., Dennis Clark, formerly of Meridian Data, Inc.,
Leon Whidbee and Gisele Venczel at Disc Manufacturing, Inc., Lance Buder and Sylvester Pefek
at Optical Media International, and Tom Brown at Reflective Software.
|Welcome| |Findings-of-Facts| |Criminal Indictments WIP| |Fleeing Charge Scandal| |Stan J. Caterbone Bio| |Is Lancaster Ground Zero?| |
New Document Library| |New Video Library| |Mind Control Video Library| |Telepathic Telecommunications| |Mind Control Research| |
BiPolar Mood Diagnosis| |Sammy Caterbone (Brother)| |Samuel Caterbone, Jr., (father)| |Letter to Dr. Phil (NBC TV)| |Letter to Chief Sadler
LCPD| |Amended Complaint 2007| |Third Circuit Brief 07/2/08| |Third Circuit Opinion 09/28/08| |Lippiatt Amicus| |Amicus Curiae Brief NSA|
|v. City of Lancaster 08-02982| |County of Lancaster 08-02983| |v. PENNDOT 08-02981| |Civil Rights Complaints| |UGI & PPL Disputes| |
Advanced Media Group| |Tom's Project Hope| |Activist Shareholder| |International Signal Control (ISC)| |Downtown Lancaster Plan| |
Excelsior Place Proposal| |FinancialManagementGroup| |Lancaster Home Rule Application| |1987 SONY Joint Venture| |1992 CCHR
Complaint| |Had Lancaster Lost It's ...| |NIST Unix CD-ROM Article| |1987 Mortgage Banking| |Radio Science Laboratories| |Management
Consulting| |Home| |Other|
www.amgglobalentetainentgroup.com Hosted by OMNIS since 2015
Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200
WWW.AMGGLOBALENTERTAINMENTGROUP.COM
WEBSITE DAILY STATS FOR November 18, 2009
March 12, 2017
___________________________________________
HITS % OF TOTAL SERVER NETWORK
1. 15,870 54.29% SERVER Network

2. 5,045 17.26% Unresolved/Unknown
3. 4,961 16.97% US Commercial
4. 865 2.96% United States
5. 417 1.43% Canada
6. 254 0.87% US Educational
7. 235 0.80% Non-Profit Organization
8. 213 0.73% US Government
9. 184 0.63% Russian Federation
10. 132 0.45% International (int)
11. 118 0.40% United Kingdom
12.115 0.39% Switzerland
13.113 0.39% Norway
14. 109 0.37% US Military
15. 85 0.29% Sweden
16. 75 0.26% Portugal
17. 70 0.24% Poland
18. 63 0.22% Turkey
19. 61 0.21% China
20. 60 0.21% Australia
21. 58 0.20% Finland
22. 56 0.19% Dominican Republic
23. 54 0.18% Old style Arpanet (arpa)
24. 4 0.01% Philippines
25. 4 0.01% Seychelles
26. 3 0.01% Belgium
27. 3 0.01% Thailand
28. 2 0.01% India
29. 2 0.01% Taiwan
30.1 0.00% Israel
31.
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP WEBSTATS Page 1 of 141 Sunday March 12, 2017
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., Preliminary
Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-
cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, March 8, 2017.
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Appeal from 17-10615
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re
Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157
Usage Statistics for amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Summary Period: November 2009
Generated 19-Nov-2009 02:49 Eastern Standard Time
[Daily Statistics] [Hourly Statistics] [URLs] [Entry] [Exit] [Sites] [Referrers] [Search] [Agents] [Countries]
Monthly Statistics for November 2009
Total Hits 29234

Total Files 27082
Total Pages 1996
Total Visits 907
Total KBytes 328984
Total Unique Sites 491

Total Unique URLs 256
Total Unique Referrers 122
Total Unique User Agents 287
. Avg Max
Hits per Hour 64 533

Hits per Day 1538 2788
Files per Day 1425 2466
Pages per Day 105 233
Visits per Day 47 64
KBytes per Day 17315 38466
Hits by Response Code
Code 200 - OK 27082

Code 206 - Partial Content 18
Code 304 - Not Modified 1520
Code 404 - Not Found 547
Code 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable 2
Code 500 - Internal Server Error 65
Daily Statistics for November 2009
Day Hits Files Pages Visits Sites KBytes
1 758 2.59% 682 2.52% 46 2.30% 23 2.54% 26 5.30% 8811 2.68%
2 1578 5.40% 1356 5.01% 90 4.51% 52 5.73% 48 9.78% 16646 5.06%
3 1727 5.91% 1690 6.24% 185 9.27% 49 5.40% 46 9.37% 22171 6.74%
4 959 3.28% 923 3.41% 65 3.26% 44 4.85% 41 8.35% 11711 3.56%
5 1713 5.86% 1637 6.04% 88 4.41% 48 5.29% 38 7.74% 16513 5.02%
6 1270 4.34% 1245 4.60% 78 3.91% 64 7.06% 39 7.94% 14399 4.38%
7 791 2.71% 719 2.65% 73 3.66% 46 5.07% 32 6.52% 12672 3.85%
8 2211 7.56% 1938 7.16% 144 7.21% 62 6.84% 45 9.16% 23302 7.08%
9 1604 5.49% 1569 5.79% 190 9.52% 46 5.07% 37 7.54% 26472 8.05%
10 1826 6.25% 1635 6.04% 136 6.81% 54 5.95% 44 8.96% 20671 6.28%
11 2788 9.54% 2466 9.11% 233 11.67% 58 6.39% 47 9.57% 38466 11.69%
12 1857 6.35% 1620 5.98% 74 3.71% 46 5.07% 43 8.76% 12992 3.95%
13 1487 5.09% 1445 5.34% 96 4.81% 42 4.63% 41 8.35% 15859 4.82%
14 995 3.40% 978 3.61% 63 3.16% 49 5.40% 72 14.66% 9542 2.90%
15 1316 4.50% 1181 4.36% 89 4.46% 39 4.30% 35 7.13% 14885 4.52%
16 1784 6.10% 1630 6.02% 91 4.56% 58 6.39% 80 16.29% 17962 5.46%
17 1742 5.96% 1592 5.88% 76 3.81% 58 6.39% 41 8.35% 15071 4.58%
18 2419 8.27% 2374 8.77% 144 7.21% 63 6.95% 87 17.72% 23605 7.18%
19 409 1.40% 402 1.48% 35 1.75% 7 0.77% 8 1.63% 7236 2.20%
Hourly Statistics for November 2009
Hits Files Pages KBytes

Hour
Avg Total Avg Total Avg Total Avg Total
0 30 579 1.98% 29 560 2.07% 2 38 1.90% 409 7776 2.36%
1 36 688 2.35% 35 674 2.49% 3 59 2.96% 481 9139 2.78%
2 47 901 3.08% 43 819 3.02% 4 77 3.86% 729 13855 4.21%
3 22 426 1.46% 21 412 1.52% 1 30 1.50% 216 4110 1.25%
4 53 1017 3.48% 52 993 3.67% 6 116 5.81% 616 11697 3.56%
5 11 216 0.74% 11 209 0.77% 1 21 1.05% 178 3386 1.03%
6 39 747 2.56% 38 728 2.69% 6 126 6.31% 840 15957 4.85%
7 58 1111 3.80% 48 918 3.39% 4 82 4.11% 695 13204 4.01%
8 69 1321 4.52% 56 1075 3.97% 3 75 3.76% 624 11847 3.60%
9 46 887 3.03% 45 867 3.20% 2 51 2.56% 453 8600 2.61%
10 65 1243 4.25% 54 1027 3.79% 3 57 2.86% 489 9284 2.82%
11 98 1870 6.40% 96 1833 6.77% 5 96 4.81% 929 17651 5.37%
12 106 2019 6.91% 101 1924 7.10% 4 79 3.96% 848 16115 4.90%
13 106 2024 6.92% 97 1861 6.87% 3 69 3.46% 778 14788 4.50%
14 80 1531 5.24% 72 1382 5.10% 4 92 4.61% 816 15509 4.71%
15 64 1232 4.21% 57 1101 4.07% 3 71 3.56% 543 10319 3.14%
16 79 1514 5.18% 68 1304 4.82% 5 103 5.16% 981 18638 5.67%
17 90 1727 5.91% 88 1677 6.19% 8 159 7.97% 1480 28116 8.55%
18 82 1573 5.38% 78 1493 5.51% 5 96 4.81% 839 15939 4.84%
19 88 1680 5.75% 80 1524 5.63% 8 170 8.52% 1306 24819 7.54%
20 81 1556 5.32% 77 1475 5.45% 5 112 5.61% 986 18742 5.70%
21 78 1488 5.09% 72 1385 5.11% 5 104 5.21% 956 18162 5.52%
22 32 618 2.11% 31 605 2.23% 2 38 1.90% 385 7310 2.22%
23 66 1266 4.33% 65 1236 4.56% 3 75 3.76% 738 14020 4.26%
Top 30 of 256 Total URLs
# Hits KBytes URL
1 484 1.66% 263 0.08% /widgets/noieactivate.js

2 435 1.49% 125989 38.30% /
3 257 0.88% 91 0.03% /robots.txt
4 134 0.46% 7840 2.38% /gpage.html
5 86 0.29% 7713 2.34% /gpage35.html
6 75 0.26% 5440 1.65% /gpage38.html
7 72 0.25% 10585 3.22% /gpage41.html
8 63 0.22% 3336 1.01% /gpage34.html
9 62 0.21% 8244 2.51% /gpage33.html
10 61 0.21% 5923 1.80% /gpage9.html
11 58 0.20% 2684 0.82% /gpage39.html
12 54 0.18% 2250 0.68% /gpage13.html
13 48 0.16% 2989 0.91% /gpage37.html
14 44 0.15% 1882 0.57% /gpage36.html
15 37 0.13% 1677 0.51% /gpage25.html
16 37 0.13% 3936 1.20% /gpage27.html
17 35 0.12% 4159 1.26% /gpage28.html
18 33 0.11% 2233 0.68% /gpage1.html
19 33 0.11% 4316 1.31% /gpage10.html
20 33 0.11% 3400 1.03% /gpage5.html
21 28 0.10% 1778 0.54% /gpage23.html
22 28 0.10% 12596 3.83% /gpage30.html
23 27 0.09% 1456 0.44% /gpage29.html
24 26 0.09% 1255 0.38% /gpage32.html
25 25 0.09% 2312 0.70% /gpage26.html
26 25 0.09% 1054 0.32% /gpage4.html
27 21 0.07% 1260 0.38% /gpage3.html
28 20 0.07% 5147 1.56% /gpage17.html
29 20 0.07% 14362 4.37% /gpage22.html
30 20 0.07% 1107 0.34% /gpage31.html
Top 10 of 256 Total URLs By KBytes
# Hits KBytes URL
1 435 1.49% 125989 38.30% /

2 20 0.07% 14362 4.37% /gpage22.html
3 28 0.10% 12596 3.83% /gpage30.html
4 72 0.25% 10585 3.22% /gpage41.html
5 62 0.21% 8244 2.51% /gpage33.html
6 134 0.46% 7840 2.38% /gpage.html
7 86 0.29% 7713 2.34% /gpage35.html
8 61 0.21% 5923 1.80% /gpage9.html
9 75 0.26% 5440 1.65% /gpage38.html
10 20 0.07% 5147 1.56% /gpage17.html
Top 10 of 46 Total Entry Pages
# Hits Visits URL
1 435 1.49% 345 38.76% /

2 134 0.46% 86 9.66% /gpage.html
3 33 0.11% 25 2.81% /gpage5.html
4 33 0.11% 23 2.58% /gpage1.html
5 33 0.11% 22 2.47% /gpage10.html
6 75 0.26% 21 2.36% /gpage38.html
7 61 0.21% 20 2.25% /gpage9.html
8 26 0.09% 19 2.13% /gpage32.html
9 86 0.29% 19 2.13% /gpage35.html
10 58 0.20% 18 2.02% /gpage39.html
Top 10 of 47 Total Exit Pages
# Hits Visits URL
1 435 1.49% 273 30.81% /

2 134 0.46% 38 4.29% /gpage.html
3 86 0.29% 37 4.18% /gpage35.html
4 72 0.25% 33 3.72% /gpage41.html
5 75 0.26% 25 2.82% /gpage38.html
6 62 0.21% 24 2.71% /gpage33.html
7 33 0.11% 22 2.48% /gpage5.html
8 33 0.11% 21 2.37% /gpage1.html
9 33 0.11% 21 2.37% /gpage10.html
10 63 0.22% 21 2.37% /gpage34.html
Top 30 of 491 Total Sites
# Hits Files KBytes Visits Hostname
1 2603 8.90% 2421 8.94% 31303 9.52% 33 3.64% c-71-204-176-248.hsd1.ca.comcast.net

2 2078 7.11% 1724 6.37% 16247 4.94% 39 4.30% c-174-59-41-77.hsd1.pa.comcast.net
4 760 2.60% 559 2.06% 2616 0.80% 4 0.44% 164.156.112.148
5 645 2.21% 573 2.12% 4367 1.33% 7 0.77% webmail1.co.lancaster.pa.us
6 631 2.16% 624 2.30% 13489 4.10% 4 0.44% adsl-9-120-106.mia.bellsouth.net
7 583 1.99% 396 1.46% 3419 1.04% 6 0.66% 146.145.79.54
10 381 1.30% 373 1.38% 3564 1.08% 3 0.33% support.metrohispeed.com
11 359 1.23% 290 1.07% 4839 1.47% 4 0.44% blk-7-208-234.eastlink.ca
12 357 1.22% 136 0.50% 922 0.28% 1 0.11% 66.216.177.234.static.dejazzd.com
13 318 1.09% 279 1.03% 13561 4.12% 60 6.62% 168.133.61.130
14 229 0.78% 165 0.61% 1963 0.60% 1 0.11% 71.204.176.248
15 223 0.76% 113 0.42% 952 0.29% 2 0.22% pencil.staples.com
16 218 0.75% 217 0.80% 598 0.18% 2 0.22% 170.122.200.57
17 213 0.73% 207 0.76% 1591 0.48% 2 0.22% unassigned.acumenassociates.com
18 192 0.66% 189 0.70% 1303 0.40% 3 0.33% 63.87.75.67
19 186 0.64% 184 0.68% 1682 0.51% 3 0.33% aurora.fult.com
21 174 0.60% 170 0.63% 3057 0.93% 1 0.11% c-24-16-135-79.hsd1.wa.comcast.net
22 157 0.54% 157 0.58% 839 0.26% 2 0.22% tc-gw.exabot.com
23 156 0.53% 155 0.57% 1265 0.38% 2 0.22% c-69-139-235-129.hsd1.md.comcast.net
24 155 0.53% 155 0.57% 2167 0.66% 1 0.11% wdcsun34.usdoj.gov
25 149 0.51% 144 0.53% 1519 0.46% 3 0.33% c-71-227-87-48.hsd1.mi.comcast.net
26 146 0.50% 140 0.52% 430 0.13% 2 0.22% mail.pa-legion.com
27 142 0.49% 139 0.51% 503 0.15% 3 0.33% c-98-209-63-178.hsd1.mi.comcast.net
28 139 0.48% 137 0.51% 1044 0.32% 2 0.22% 99.18.24.57
30 135 0.46% 133 0.49% 1673 0.51% 2 0.22% ip72-192-191-22.sd.sd.cox.net
Top 10 of 491 Total Sites By KBytes
1 2603 8.90% 2421 8.94% 31303 9.52% 33 3.64% c-71-204-176-248.hsd1.ca.comcast.net

4 318 1.09% 279 1.03% 13561 4.12% 60 6.62% 168.133.61.130
5 631 2.16% 624 2.30% 13489 4.10% 4 0.44% adsl-9-120-106.mia.bellsouth.net
6 85 0.29% 85 0.31% 9303 2.83% 1 0.11% 89-253-70-223.customers.ownit.se
7 359 1.23% 290 1.07% 4839 1.47% 4 0.44% blk-7-208-234.eastlink.ca
8 70 0.24% 55 0.20% 4375 1.33% 26 2.87% crawl-66-249-65-149.googlebot.com
9 645 2.21% 573 2.12% 4367 1.33% 7 0.77% webmail1.co.lancaster.pa.us
10 46 0.16% 46 0.17% 4006 1.22% 22 2.43% h-180-78.scoutjet.com
Top 30 of 122 Total Referrers
# Hits Referrer
0.96
1 281 % http://d15673896.u189.sitewebmasters.com/index.html
0.93
2 271 % http://205.209.97.111/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder
0.61
3 179 % http://74.125.95.132/search
0.52
4 151 % http://www.google.com/search
0.37
5 107 % http://74.125.113.132/search
0.36
6 106 % http://74.125.93.132/search
0.18
7 53 % http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx
0.18
8 52 % http://74.125.155.132/search
0.12
9 34 % http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_(A_to_Z)/Stocks_F/threadview
0.07
10 21 % http://cp.sitewebmasters.com/psoft/servlet/psoft.hsphere.CP/amgroup01/15673877_0/psoft.hsphere.CP
0.05
11 16 % http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099871/board/nest/151087347
0.04
12 12 % http://search.yahoo.com/search
0.03
13 8 % http://www.google.com/url
0.02
14 6 % http://www.google.co.uk/search
0.02
15 5 % http://us.mc462.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome
0.02
16 5 % http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099871/board/thread/151087347
0.01
17 4 % http://d15673896.u189.sitewebmasters.com/gpage35.html
0.01
18 4 % http://www.bing.com/search
0.01
19 4 % http://www.cookiestuffingtips.com
0.01
20 4 % http://www.google.ca/search
0.01
21 3 % http://www.google.co.in/search
0.01
22 3 % http://www.theguestbook.com/read.php/187858
0.01
23 3 % http://www.yandex.ru/yandsearch
0.01
24 2 % http://aolsearcht2.search.aol.com/aol/search
0.01
25 2 % http://by117w.bay117.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx
0.01
26 2 % http://ms118b.notes.wachovia.net/mail7/a769995.nsf/(
0.01
27 2 % http://savercheaper.net
0.01
28 2 % http://us.mc300.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome
0.01
29 2 % http://www.google.com.au/search
0.01
30 2 % http://www.google.com/custom
Top 20 of 104 Total Search Strings
# Hits Search String
1 47 26.55% stan caterbone

2 8 4.52% stanley caterbone
3 4 2.26% advanced media group scam
4 4 2.26% lefty plank
5 3 1.69% stan j. caterbone
6 2 1.13% amg global llc an
7 2 1.13% herb fisher lancaster pa
8 2 1.13% judge louis farina rulings appeal pa
9 2 1.13% pami pflumm conestogapa
10 2 1.13% pflumm contractors inc problems
11 2 1.13% refund mail being diverted
12 2 1.13% rico v. eyemart express
13 2 1.13% stan caterbone lancaster pa
14 2 1.13% the isc/ferranti scandal
15 2 1.13% united chem-con
16 2 1.13% unix tar into small file sizes
17 2 1.13% william plank drug bust in lancaster pa
18 1 0.56% 18 pa.c.s.a. 5503 a4
19 1 0.56% 1987 sony trinitron
20 1 0.56% 2-18 ghz diplexer
Top 15 of 287 Total User Agents
User Agent
IE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.0;+GTB6;+SLCC1;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+Media+Center+PC+5.0;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30618;+AskT
Windows+NT+5.1;+en-US;+rv:1.9.1.5)+Gecko/20091102+Firefox/3.5.5
Windows+NT+6.0;+en-US;+rv:1.9.1.5)+Gecko/20091102+Firefox/3.5.5+(.NET+CLR+3.5.30729)
IE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+SV1;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322;+.NET+CLR+3.0.04506.30;+.NET+CLR+3.0.04506.648;+.NET+CL
IE+8.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Trident/4.0;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.0.4506.2152;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322)
.1;+InfoPath.1;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322;+.NET+CLR+3.0.04506.30;+.NET+CLR+3.0.04506.648;+.NET+CLR+3.0.4506.2152;+
IE+8.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Trident/4.0;+GTB6;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322;+eSobiSubscriber+2.0.4.16;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.0.4506.21
IE+8.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Trident/4.0;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.0.4506.2152;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729)
IE+7.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+ga=MDAxMTExY2Y2OGZl;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.0.4506.2152;+.NET+CLR+3
Top 30 of 32 Total Countries
# Hits Files KBytes Country
1 15870 54.29% 14966 55.26% 149057 45.31% Network

2 5045 17.26% 4493 16.59% 71154 21.63% Unresolved/Unknown
3 4961 16.97% 4508 16.65% 72399 22.01% US Commercial
4 865 2.96% 790 2.92% 5502 1.67% United States
5 417 1.43% 346 1.28% 5277 1.60% Canada
6 254 0.87% 249 0.92% 874 0.27% US Educational
7 235 0.80% 175 0.65% 689 0.21% Non-Profit Organization
8 213 0.73% 212 0.78% 2668 0.81% US Government
9 184 0.63% 184 0.68% 3494 1.06% Russian Federation
10 132 0.45% 130 0.48% 642 0.20% International (int)
11 118 0.40% 111 0.41% 739 0.22% United Kingdom
12 115 0.39% 112 0.41% 672 0.20% Switzerland
13 113 0.39% 111 0.41% 1060 0.32% Norway
14 109 0.37% 109 0.40% 362 0.11% US Military
15 85 0.29% 85 0.31% 9303 2.83% Sweden
16 75 0.26% 74 0.27% 620 0.19% Portugal
17 70 0.24% 70 0.26% 296 0.09% Poland
18 63 0.22% 61 0.23% 628 0.19% Turkey
19 61 0.21% 58 0.21% 474 0.14% China
20 60 0.21% 58 0.21% 438 0.13% Australia
21 58 0.20% 56 0.21% 437 0.13% Finland
22 56 0.19% 55 0.20% 268 0.08% Dominican Republic
23 54 0.18% 54 0.20% 435 0.13% Old style Arpanet (arpa)
24 4 0.01% 4 0.01% 9 0.00% Philippines
25 4 0.01% 4 0.01% 757 0.23% Seychelles
26 3 0.01% 3 0.01% 228 0.07% Belgium
27 3 0.01% 1 0.00% 68 0.02% Thailand
28 2 0.01% 0 0.00% 4 0.00% India
29 2 0.01% 2 0.01% 113 0.03% Taiwan
30 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 314 0.10% Israel
Generated by Webalizer Version 2.01
Stan J. Caterbone

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
WEBSITE STATS FOR FEBRUARY 2017
March 12, 2017
___________________________________________
HITS % OF TOTAL COUNTRY
1. 7,980 89.10% United States

2. 404 4.51% Germany
3. 248 2.77% China
4. 86 0.96% France
6. 74 0.83% Czech Republic
7. 11 0.12% Netherlands
8. 7 0.08% Canada
9. 7 0.08% Great Britain (UK)
10. 7 0.08% Ireland
11. 7 0.08% India
12. 7 0.08% Sweden
13. 6 0.07% Norway
14. 5 0.06% Israel
15. 3 0.03% Spain
16. 3 0.03% Korea, Republic of
17. 2 0.02% Bangladesh
18. 2 0.02% Egypt
19. 2 0.02% Italy
20. 2 0.02% Lithuania
21. 2 0.02% Poland
22. 2 0.02% Romania
23. 2 0.02% Turkey
24. 1 0.01% Brazil
25. 1 0.01% Thailand
26. 1 0.01% Ukraine
27. 1 0.01% Anonymous Proxy
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP WEBSTATS Page

Page13
1 of
of129
141 Sunday March 12, 2017
ACTIVE COURT CASES

U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., Preliminary
Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-
cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, March 8, 2017.
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Appeal from 17-10615
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re
Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

Page14
2 of
of129
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - February 2017 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201702.html
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Summary Period: February 2017
Generated 01-Mar-2017 04:19 GMT
Monthly Statistics for February 2017

Total Hits 8956
Total Files 1551
Total Pages 1653
Total Visits 1029
Total KBytes 226373

. Avg Max
Sites per Day 45 101

Code 200 - OK 17.32% 1551
Code 206 - Partial Content 0.07% 6
Code 304 - Not Modified 0.49% 44
Code 404 - Not Found 82.11% 7354
Code 406 - Not Acceptable 0.01% 1
Daily Statistics for February 2017

17 656 7.32% 149 9.61% 151 9.13% 99 9.62% 73 13.35% 22152 9.79%
18 1308 14.60% 137 8.83% 153 9.26% 111 10.79% 101 18.46% 20769 9.17%
19 627 7.00% 184 11.86% 189 11.43% 84 8.16% 57 10.42% 24001 10.60%

Page15
3 of
of129
1 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
20 641 7.16% 171 11.03% 191 11.55% 101 9.82% 66 12.07% 25793 11.39%
21 775 8.65% 113 7.29% 126 7.62% 85 8.26% 72 13.16% 18813 8.31%
22 818 9.13% 134 8.64% 141 8.53% 104 10.11% 66 12.07% 19246 8.50%
23 900 10.05% 132 8.51% 140 8.47% 87 8.45% 76 13.89% 18185 8.03%
24 499 5.57% 83 5.35% 86 5.20% 73 7.09% 77 14.08% 12746 5.63%
25 181 2.02% 86 5.54% 90 5.44% 58 5.64% 56 10.24% 10581 4.67%
26 219 2.45% 45 2.90% 49 2.96% 48 4.66% 53 9.69% 7590 3.35%
27 521 5.82% 80 5.16% 89 5.38% 80 7.77% 81 14.81% 12193 5.39%
28 1811 20.22% 237 15.28% 248 15.00% 101 9.82% 77 14.08% 34304 15.15%
Hourly Statistics for February 2017

Hour
0 24 295 3.29% 11 132 8.51% 11 135 8.17% 1354 16254 7.18%
1 21 260 2.90% 3 38 2.45% 3 40 2.42% 596 7151 3.16%
2 17 211 2.36% 4 56 3.61% 4 57 3.45% 576 6907 3.05%
3 19 230 2.57% 8 105 6.77% 9 110 6.65% 1171 14047 6.21%
4 16 197 2.20% 3 38 2.45% 4 53 3.21% 345 4136 1.83%
5 11 134 1.50% 4 51 3.29% 4 54 3.27% 499 5982 2.64%
6 15 188 2.10% 7 93 6.00% 7 95 5.75% 1023 12276 5.42%
7 13 161 1.80% 3 47 3.03% 4 51 3.09% 398 4772 2.11%
8 9 112 1.25% 3 40 2.58% 3 47 2.84% 513 6154 2.72%
9 9 108 1.21% 2 30 1.93% 2 31 1.88% 298 3578 1.58%
10 17 210 2.34% 2 34 2.19% 3 36 2.18% 399 4786 2.11%
11 32 387 4.32% 7 88 5.67% 7 92 5.57% 1057 12687 5.60%
12 29 348 3.89% 6 74 4.77% 6 79 4.78% 899 10793 4.77%
13 33 399 4.46% 5 70 4.51% 6 75 4.54% 954 11450 5.06%
14 34 419 4.68% 3 36 2.32% 3 40 2.42% 664 7972 3.52%
15 39 479 5.35% 7 95 6.13% 8 97 5.87% 1054 12653 5.59%
16 55 670 7.48% 7 90 5.80% 7 93 5.63% 1086 13032 5.76%
17 31 382 4.27% 4 50 3.22% 4 53 3.21% 691 8295 3.66%
18 118 1416 15.81% 4 57 3.68% 5 67 4.05% 1032 12380 5.47%
19 105 1264 14.11% 4 54 3.48% 4 58 3.51% 955 11460 5.06%
20 29 357 3.99% 5 65 4.19% 5 68 4.11% 942 11304 4.99%
21 17 205 2.29% 4 57 3.68% 5 61 3.69% 687 8241 3.64%
22 23 283 3.16% 5 63 4.06% 5 68 4.11% 778 9330 4.12%
23 20 241 2.69% 7 88 5.67% 7 93 5.63% 894 10731 4.74%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 376 4.20% 22514 9.95% /default.htm
2 158 1.76% 48103 21.25% /index-2.html
3 84 0.94% 6168 2.72% /gpage13.html
4 67 0.75% 30988 13.69% /gpage30.html
5 37 0.41% 4320 1.91% /gpage28.html

Page16
4 of
of129
2 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
6 33 0.37% 21013 9.28% /gpage22.html
7 33 0.37% 2272 1.00% /gpage38.html
8 32 0.36% 7662 3.38% /gpage17.html
9 30 0.33% 7209 3.18% /gpage16.html
10 29 0.32% 3737 1.65% /gpage19.html
11 27 0.30% 1647 0.73% /gpage37.html
12 26 0.29% 1793 0.79% /gpage1.html
13 26 0.29% 3904 1.72% /gpage41.html
14 25 0.28% 254 0.11% /Splash_Screen.html
15 25 0.28% 3358 1.48% /gpage33.html
16 25 0.28% 3232 1.43% /gpage8.html
17 25 0.28% 3628 1.60% /gpage9.html
18 24 0.27% 2678 1.18% /gpage18.html
19 24 0.27% 1090 0.48% /gpage32.html
20 23 0.26% 900 0.40% /gpage15.html
21 23 0.26% 912 0.40% /gpage4.html
22 22 0.25% 1076 0.48% /gpage11.html
23 22 0.25% 2012 0.89% /gpage21.html
24 22 0.25% 978 0.43% /gpage25.html
25 22 0.25% 1080 0.48% /gpage31.html
26 22 0.25% 936 0.41% /gpage36.html
27 21 0.23% 6305 2.79% /
28 21 0.23% 2733 1.21% /gpage10.html
29 21 0.23% 2198 0.97% /gpage24.html
30 21 0.23% 2258 1.00% /gpage27.html
31 21 0.23% 789 0.35% /gpage7.html
32 20 0.22% 2692 1.19% /gpage20.html
33 19 0.21% 764 0.34% /gpage14.html
34 19 0.21% 994 0.44% /gpage29.html
35 19 0.21% 1163 0.51% /gpage3.html
36 19 0.21% 1029 0.45% /gpage34.html
37 18 0.20% 775 0.34% /gpage12.html
38 18 0.20% 1688 0.75% /gpage26.html
39 18 0.20% 1874 0.83% /gpage5.html
40 18 0.20% 873 0.39% /gpage6.html
41 17 0.19% 1142 0.50% /gpage23.html
42 17 0.19% 822 0.36% /gpage39.html
43 16 0.18% 1328 0.59% /gpage2.html
44 16 0.18% 594 0.26% /gpage40.html

# Hits KBytes URL
1 158 1.76% 48103 21.25% /index-2.html
2 67 0.75% 30988 13.69% /gpage30.html
3 376 4.20% 22514 9.95% /default.htm
4 33 0.37% 21013 9.28% /gpage22.html
5 32 0.36% 7662 3.38% /gpage17.html
6 30 0.33% 7209 3.18% /gpage16.html
7 21 0.23% 6305 2.79% /
8 84 0.94% 6168 2.72% /gpage13.html
9 37 0.41% 4320 1.91% /gpage28.html
10 26 0.29% 3904 1.72% /gpage41.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 376 4.20% 339 33.66% /default.htm
2 158 1.76% 120 11.92% /index-2.html
3 84 0.94% 64 6.36% /gpage13.html

Page17
5 of
of129
3 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
4 67 0.75% 53 5.26% /gpage30.html
5 37 0.41% 25 2.48% /gpage28.html
6 33 0.37% 22 2.18% /gpage22.html
7 33 0.37% 18 1.79% /gpage38.html
8 21 0.23% 17 1.69% /
9 29 0.32% 15 1.49% /gpage19.html
10 32 0.36% 14 1.39% /gpage17.html
11 24 0.27% 14 1.39% /gpage18.html
12 27 0.30% 13 1.29% /gpage37.html
13 30 0.33% 12 1.19% /gpage16.html
14 22 0.25% 12 1.19% /gpage31.html
15 24 0.27% 12 1.19% /gpage32.html
16 25 0.28% 12 1.19% /gpage33.html
17 22 0.25% 12 1.19% /gpage36.html
18 26 0.29% 11 1.09% /gpage1.html
19 22 0.25% 11 1.09% /gpage11.html
20 23 0.26% 11 1.09% /gpage15.html
21 22 0.25% 11 1.09% /gpage21.html
22 21 0.23% 10 0.99% /gpage24.html
23 22 0.25% 10 0.99% /gpage25.html
24 19 0.21% 10 0.99% /gpage34.html
25 23 0.26% 10 0.99% /gpage4.html
26 26 0.29% 10 0.99% /gpage41.html
27 25 0.28% 10 0.99% /gpage8.html
28 25 0.28% 10 0.99% /gpage9.html
29 18 0.20% 9 0.89% /gpage12.html
30 20 0.22% 9 0.89% /gpage20.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 376 4.20% 343 33.86% /default.htm
2 158 1.76% 120 11.85% /index-2.html
3 84 0.94% 69 6.81% /gpage13.html
4 67 0.75% 48 4.74% /gpage30.html
5 37 0.41% 20 1.97% /gpage28.html
6 21 0.23% 18 1.78% /
8 33 0.37% 18 1.78% /gpage22.html
9 32 0.36% 16 1.58% /gpage17.html
10 33 0.37% 16 1.58% /gpage38.html
11 29 0.32% 15 1.48% /gpage19.html
12 24 0.27% 15 1.48% /gpage32.html
13 24 0.27% 14 1.38% /gpage18.html
14 30 0.33% 13 1.28% /gpage16.html
15 25 0.28% 13 1.28% /gpage8.html

1 1465 16.36% 113 7.29% 37992 16.78% 94 9.14% 108.11.207.18
2 1030 11.50% 10 0.64% 3477 1.54% 2 0.19% 50.107.50.58
3 850 9.49% 8 0.52% 3009 1.33% 1 0.10% 72.43.99.130
4 314 3.51% 34 2.19% 3082 1.36% 31 3.01% 24.128.107.196
5 282 3.15% 4 0.26% 1190 0.53% 1 0.10% 107.1.94.214
6 272 3.04% 2 0.13% 663 0.29% 1 0.10% 161.150.176.3
7 173 1.93% 24 1.55% 1816 0.80% 25 2.43% 66.249.79.127
8 171 1.91% 1 0.06% 456 0.20% 1 0.10% 205.143.205.150
9 168 1.88% 0 0.00% 294 0.13% 0 0.00% 85.25.210.234
10 162 1.81% 1 0.06% 597 0.26% 1 0.10% 65.88.88.200

Page18
6 of
of129
4 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
11 159 1.78% 51 3.29% 8886 3.93% 28 2.72% 207.46.13.144
12 118 1.32% 1 0.06% 266 0.12% 1 0.10% 108.55.76.192
13 114 1.27% 2 0.13% 318 0.14% 2 0.19% 62.138.0.25
14 113 1.26% 2 0.13% 331 0.15% 1 0.10% 12.108.119.179
15 92 1.03% 34 2.19% 3079 1.36% 27 2.62% 40.77.167.113
16 91 1.02% 0 0.00% 160 0.07% 0 0.00% 85.25.210.41
17 89 0.99% 48 3.09% 4103 1.81% 31 3.01% 157.55.39.191
18 81 0.90% 32 2.06% 4569 2.02% 29 2.82% 40.77.167.133
19 68 0.76% 63 4.06% 9015 3.98% 1 0.10% 72.79.57.172
20 67 0.75% 21 1.35% 3145 1.39% 20 1.94% 207.46.13.152
21 62 0.69% 2 0.13% 363 0.16% 1 0.10% 212.119.164.254
22 60 0.67% 38 2.45% 2748 1.21% 30 2.92% 207.46.13.136
23 58 0.65% 1 0.06% 864 0.38% 1 0.10% 174.54.20.13
24 58 0.65% 1 0.06% 355 0.16% 1 0.10% 192.77.237.122
25 58 0.65% 1 0.06% 176 0.08% 1 0.10% 205.234.117.2
26 57 0.64% 1 0.06% 247 0.11% 1 0.10% 174.59.206.16
27 57 0.64% 1 0.06% 242 0.11% 1 0.10% 206.192.83.174
28 57 0.64% 32 2.06% 4218 1.86% 14 1.36% 40.77.167.48
29 57 0.64% 1 0.06% 159 0.07% 1 0.10% 69.162.73.46
30 56 0.63% 1 0.06% 157 0.07% 1 0.10% 208.87.234.202
31 56 0.63% 1 0.06% 337 0.15% 1 0.10% 64.14.145.215
32 56 0.63% 1 0.06% 157 0.07% 1 0.10% 72.78.33.190
33 55 0.61% 1 0.06% 155 0.07% 1 0.10% 78.249.28.215
34 54 0.60% 1 0.06% 408 0.18% 1 0.10% 24.105.132.254
35 54 0.60% 22 1.42% 1816 0.80% 22 2.14% 66.249.79.68
36 51 0.57% 7 0.45% 2097 0.93% 5 0.49% 166.137.240.47
37 50 0.56% 1 0.06% 401 0.18% 1 0.10% 66.102.7.199
38 48 0.54% 43 2.77% 4332 1.91% 1 0.10% 104.131.223.26
39 48 0.54% 43 2.77% 4332 1.91% 1 0.10% 104.236.6.230
40 46 0.51% 43 2.77% 5094 2.25% 2 0.19% 54.146.176.30
41 46 0.51% 43 2.77% 5365 2.37% 2 0.19% 54.146.184.210
42 40 0.45% 28 1.81% 2611 1.15% 16 1.55% 17.142.154.222
43 39 0.44% 27 1.74% 4119 1.82% 12 1.17% 157.55.39.217
44 39 0.44% 0 0.00% 68 0.03% 0 0.00% 40.77.167.45
45 38 0.42% 9 0.58% 1453 0.64% 9 0.87% 207.46.13.157
46 36 0.40% 4 0.26% 361 0.16% 2 0.19% 174.192.34.220
47 36 0.40% 0 0.00% 63 0.03% 0 0.00% 66.102.7.195
48 35 0.39% 14 0.90% 2461 1.09% 5 0.49% 157.55.39.253
49 34 0.38% 25 1.61% 3388 1.50% 17 1.65% 68.180.229.33
50 31 0.35% 12 0.77% 761 0.34% 7 0.68% 141.8.143.136

1 1465 16.36% 113 7.29% 37992 16.78% 94 9.14% 108.11.207.18

2 68 0.76% 63 4.06% 9015 3.98% 1 0.10% 72.79.57.172
3 159 1.78% 51 3.29% 8886 3.93% 28 2.72% 207.46.13.144
4 46 0.51% 43 2.77% 5365 2.37% 2 0.19% 54.146.184.210
5 46 0.51% 43 2.77% 5094 2.25% 2 0.19% 54.146.176.30
6 81 0.90% 32 2.06% 4569 2.02% 29 2.82% 40.77.167.133
7 48 0.54% 43 2.77% 4332 1.91% 1 0.10% 104.131.223.26
8 48 0.54% 43 2.77% 4332 1.91% 1 0.10% 104.236.6.230
9 57 0.64% 32 2.06% 4218 1.86% 14 1.36% 40.77.167.48
10 30 0.33% 29 1.87% 4161 1.84% 1 0.10% 183.39.178.145

# Hits Referrer
1 52 0.58% http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search
2 9 0.10% https://www.google.com/

Page19
7 of
of129
5 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
3 6 0.07% http://www.bing.com/search
4 4 0.04% http://www.google.com/url
5 2 0.02% https://www.google.com
6 2 0.02% https://www.google.ru
7 1 0.01% http://45.wh.gov/XYQXNw
8 1 0.01% http://drugwarfacts.org/cms/Addictive_Properties
9 1 0.01% http://here.doh.wa.gov/materials/living-with-mrsa
10 1 0.01% http://newslanc.com
11 1 0.01% http://twitter.com/hashtag/StopSuicide
12 1 0.01% http://www.bsdh.org.uk/
13 1 0.01% http://www.cnsnews.com/
14 1 0.01% http://www.doh.wa.gov/ForPublicHealthandHealthcareProviders/HealthcareProfessionsandFacilities/PrescriptionMonitoringProgramPMP/Dispensers
15 1 0.01% http://www.doh.wa.gov/LicensesPermitsandCertificates/FacilitiesNewReneworUpdate/AnimalCareandControlandHumaneSociety/ApplicationsandForms
16 1 0.01% http://www.doh.wa.gov/LicensesPermitsandCertificates/FacilitiesNewReneworUpdate/PharmaceuticalFirms/LicenseRequirements/LegendDrugSampleDistributor
17 1 0.01% http://www.doh.wa.gov/LicensesPermitsandCertificates/ProfessionsNewReneworUpdate/AthleticTrainer/CommitteeMeetings/MeetingArchives
18 1 0.01% http://www.doh.wa.gov/LicensesPermitsandCertificates/ProfessionsNewReneworUpdate/Denturist/Fees
19 1 0.01% http://www.stalinswife.com/reviews.htm
20 1 0.01% http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/pharmacy/AcademicPrograms/Residencies/Pages/Residencies.aspx
21 1 0.01% https://plus.google.com/
22 1 0.01% https://soundcloud.com/budapest-beacon/hungarian-ngos-offer-thoughts-on-latest-government-attacks
23 1 0.01% https://t.co/i5ii6jiSyG
24 1 0.01% https://twitter.com/NintendoAmerica
25 1 0.01% https://twitter.com/Space_Station
26 1 0.01% https://twitter.com/StephenAtHome/status/832373446445252608
27 1 0.01% https://twitter.com/hashtag/rights
28 1 0.01% https://twitter.com/i/streams/stream/686639666779394074
31 1 0.01% https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
32 1 0.01% https://www.bing.com/
33 1 0.01% https://www.recoverymonth.gov/sites/all/libraries/imagesloaded/jquery.imagesloaded.min.js

# Hits User Agent
1 3730 41.65% Internet Explorer 5.0

2 2136 23.85% Safari (OSX)
3 1140 12.73% Firefox Unknown Version
4 648 7.24% Internet Explorer 6.0 (Windows)
5 554 6.19% MobileSafari/602.1 CFNetwork/808.3 Darwin/16.3.0
6 178 1.99% Spider: Baidu.com
7 107 1.19% Netscape
8 94 1.05% CCBot/2.0 (http://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
9 68 0.76% panscient.com
10 59 0.66% Spider: yahoo.com
11 52 0.58% Firefox 3
12 50 0.56% Spider: Google.com
13 30 0.33% ltx71 - (http://ltx71.com/)
14 23 0.26% Safari/12602.4.8 CFNetwork/807.2.14 Darwin/16.4.0 (x86_64)
15 15 0.17% Opera
16 12 0.13% Virusdie crawler/3.0
17 11 0.12% Spider: MSN.com
18 5 0.06% Microsoft Internet Explorer 6
19 5 0.06% Programming: Jakarta (Java)
20 4 0.04% Firefox 2
21 4 0.04% Twitterbot/1.0
22 3 0.03% facebookexternalhit/1.1 (+http://www.facebook.com/externalhit_uatext.php)
24 2 0.02% Program: WinHttp.WinHttpRequest library (Visual Basic)
25 2 0.02% Sogou web spider/4.0(+http://www.sogou.com/docs/help/webmasters.htm#07)

Page20
8 of
of129
6 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
26 1 0.01% Grammarly/1.0 (http://www.grammarly.com)
27 1 0.01% HEADMasterSEO
29 1 0.01% okhttp/3.2.0
30 1 0.01% python-requests/2.3.0 CPython/3.4.0 Linux/4.4.35-33.55.amzn1.x86_64

1 7980 89.10% 1241 80.01% 185392 81.90% United States
2 404 4.51% 26 1.68% 3692 1.63% Germany
3 248 2.77% 193 12.44% 19607 8.66% China
4 86 0.96% 23 1.48% 4219 1.86% France
6 74 0.83% 1 0.06% 584 0.26% Czech Republic
7 11 0.12% 10 0.64% 755 0.33% Netherlands
8 7 0.08% 7 0.45% 1341 0.59% Canada
9 7 0.08% 7 0.45% 2380 1.05% Great Britain (UK)
10 7 0.08% 6 0.39% 1045 0.46% Ireland
11 7 0.08% 4 0.26% 315 0.14% India
12 7 0.08% 7 0.45% 1476 0.65% Sweden
13 6 0.07% 0 0.00% 11 0.00% Norway
14 5 0.06% 2 0.13% 579 0.26% Israel
15 3 0.03% 2 0.13% 182 0.08% Spain
16 3 0.03% 3 0.19% 192 0.08% Korea, Republic of
17 2 0.02% 1 0.06% 62 0.03% Bangladesh
18 2 0.02% 1 0.06% 62 0.03% Egypt
19 2 0.02% 2 0.13% 131 0.06% Italy
20 2 0.02% 1 0.06% 62 0.03% Lithuania
21 2 0.02% 2 0.13% 560 0.25% Poland
22 2 0.02% 1 0.06% 62 0.03% Romania
23 2 0.02% 1 0.06% 62 0.03% Turkey
24 1 0.01% 1 0.06% 513 0.23% Brazil
25 1 0.01% 1 0.06% 513 0.23% Thailand
26 1 0.01% 1 0.06% 513 0.23% Ukraine
27 1 0.01% 1 0.06% 61 0.03% Anonymous Proxy

Page21
9 of
of129
7 of 7 3/12/2017 10:49 AM
Stan J. Caterbone

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
WEBSITE STATS FOR JANUARY 2017
March 12, 2017
___________________________________________
HITS % OF TOTAL COUNTRY
1. 21,105 71.19% United States

2. 4,866 16.41% Great Britain (UK)
3. 3,775 2.61% Germany
4. 662 2.23% China
5. 380 1.28% Canada
6. 278 0.94% India
7. 255 0.86% France
8. 254 0.86% Czech Republic
9. 171 0.58% Netherlands
10. 69 0.23% Korea, Republic of
11. 65 0.22% Australia
12. 63 0.21% Rwanda
13. 53 0.18% Austria
14. 49 0.17% Brazil
15. 42 0.14% Poland
16. 36 0.12% Romania
17. 34 0.11% Argentina
18. 29 0.10% Philippines
19. 26 0.09% Spain
20. 22 0.07% Serbia
22. 20 0.07% Italy
23. 20 0.07% Malaysia
24. 17 0.06% Ireland
25. 14 0.05% Belgium
26. 14 0.05% Hungary
27. 14 0.05% Ukraine
28. 13 0.04% Hong Kong
29. 12 0.04% Greece
30. 12 0.04% Pakistan
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP WEBSTATS Page 22

10 of 141
www.amgglobalentetainentgroup.com
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
ACTIVE COURT CASES

U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case
No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen
Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary
Injunction Case of 2016
WEBSITE STATISTICS
Page23
11
2 of
of110
129
141 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 12,
10, 2017
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - January 2017 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201701.html

Summary Period: January 2017
Generated 01-Feb-2017 04:21 GMT
Monthly Statistics for January 2017

Total Hits 29647
Total Files 4086
Total Pages 4754
Total Visits 2931
Total KBytes 583679
. Avg Max
Code 200 - OK 13.78% 4086

Code 404 - Not Found 85.55% 25362
Code 500 - Internal Server Error 0.03% 9

12 of 141
1 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
Daily Statistics for January 2017

1 396 1.34% 122 2.99% 191 4.02% 105 3.58% 101 6.99% 12074 2.07%
2 1260 4.25% 152 3.72% 194 4.08% 116 3.96% 109 7.54% 20184 3.46%
3 615 2.07% 126 3.08% 166 3.49% 113 3.86% 93 6.44% 16080 2.76%
4 1245 4.20% 253 6.19% 317 6.67% 140 4.78% 132 9.13% 32502 5.57%
5 1454 4.90% 263 6.44% 323 6.79% 140 4.78% 127 8.79% 29403 5.04%
6 1676 5.65% 217 5.31% 257 5.41% 113 3.86% 112 7.75% 29099 4.99%
7 565 1.91% 145 3.55% 192 4.04% 125 4.26% 108 7.47% 16318 2.80%
8 915 3.09% 132 3.23% 140 2.94% 77 2.63% 58 4.01% 15871 2.72%
9 2066 6.97% 126 3.08% 131 2.76% 91 3.10% 66 4.57% 19613 3.36%
10 945 3.19% 109 2.67% 121 2.55% 97 3.31% 70 4.84% 17150 2.94%
11 796 2.68% 79 1.93% 86 1.81% 76 2.59% 62 4.29% 15111 2.59%
12 1036 3.49% 87 2.13% 95 2.00% 79 2.70% 62 4.29% 15531 2.66%
13 1014 3.42% 77 1.88% 84 1.77% 75 2.56% 58 4.01% 16690 2.86%
14 1312 4.43% 135 3.30% 145 3.05% 68 2.32% 59 4.08% 18732 3.21%
15 797 2.69% 107 2.62% 117 2.46% 101 3.45% 88 6.09% 14129 2.42%
16 651 2.20% 129 3.16% 135 2.84% 83 2.83% 54 3.74% 18393 3.15%
17 684 2.31% 87 2.13% 94 1.98% 86 2.93% 80 5.54% 15244 2.61%
18 623 2.10% 92 2.25% 105 2.21% 86 2.93% 69 4.78% 16429 2.81%
19 1267 4.27% 146 3.57% 150 3.16% 92 3.14% 72 4.98% 22138 3.79%
20 741 2.50% 135 3.30% 149 3.13% 94 3.21% 74 5.12% 19626 3.36%
21 831 2.80% 137 3.35% 153 3.22% 108 3.68% 82 5.67% 20112 3.45%
22 718 2.42% 107 2.62% 116 2.44% 91 3.10% 80 5.54% 12964 2.22%
23 977 3.30% 127 3.11% 136 2.86% 89 3.04% 67 4.64% 21297 3.65%
24 995 3.36% 148 3.62% 158 3.32% 92 3.14% 80 5.54% 19172 3.28%
25 786 2.65% 110 2.69% 116 2.44% 85 2.90% 82 5.67% 17760 3.04%
26 731 2.47% 131 3.21% 138 2.90% 80 2.73% 70 4.84% 17878 3.06%
27 872 2.94% 142 3.48% 150 3.16% 95 3.24% 79 5.47% 21595 3.70%

13 of 141
2 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
28 713 2.40% 84 2.06% 174 3.66% 74 2.52% 68 4.71% 13635 2.34%
29 761 2.57% 112 2.74% 130 2.73% 84 2.87% 67 4.64% 16588 2.84%
30 767 2.59% 121 2.96% 133 2.80% 91 3.10% 81 5.61% 17321 2.97%
31 1438 4.85% 148 3.62% 158 3.32% 86 2.93% 67 4.64% 25040 4.29%
Hourly Statistics for January 2017

Hour
0 33 1024 3.45% 3 116 2.84% 4 134 2.82% 542 16788 2.88%
1 33 1046 3.53% 5 175 4.28% 6 193 4.06% 806 24982 4.28%
2 37 1173 3.96% 6 208 5.09% 7 228 4.80% 889 27545 4.72%
3 28 875 2.95% 4 141 3.45% 5 178 3.74% 628 19465 3.33%
4 20 650 2.19% 3 105 2.57% 3 122 2.57% 389 12064 2.07%
5 19 595 2.01% 7 229 5.60% 7 245 5.15% 737 22838 3.91%
6 22 692 2.33% 3 113 2.77% 4 143 3.01% 407 12625 2.16%
7 19 610 2.06% 5 166 4.06% 5 183 3.85% 672 20839 3.57%
8 28 874 2.95% 6 188 4.60% 6 213 4.48% 769 23841 4.08%
9 21 677 2.28% 3 121 2.96% 4 151 3.18% 481 14905 2.55%
10 24 758 2.56% 3 94 2.30% 3 112 2.36% 567 17578 3.01%
11 47 1482 5.00% 5 184 4.50% 6 210 4.42% 937 29062 4.98%
12 60 1867 6.30% 7 230 5.63% 8 257 5.41% 1051 32568 5.58%
13 65 2039 6.88% 6 189 4.63% 7 221 4.65% 764 23669 4.06%
14 41 1273 4.29% 5 162 3.96% 5 183 3.85% 867 26883 4.61%
15 30 940 3.17% 3 115 2.81% 4 136 2.86% 653 20245 3.47%
16 54 1698 5.73% 5 171 4.19% 6 192 4.04% 1020 31621 5.42%
17 60 1870 6.31% 6 199 4.87% 7 230 4.84% 1011 31335 5.37%
18 35 1097 3.70% 6 208 5.09% 7 234 4.92% 875 27127 4.65%
19 45 1424 4.80% 6 195 4.77% 9 304 6.39% 988 30633 5.25%
20 85 2637 8.89% 8 253 6.19% 9 283 5.95% 1266 39239 6.72%
21 51 1601 5.40% 6 211 5.16% 7 236 4.96% 998 30930 5.30%
22 40 1261 4.25% 6 188 4.60% 7 217 4.56% 895 27736 4.75%
23 47 1484 5.01% 4 125 3.06% 4 149 3.13% 618 19160 3.28%

# Hits KBytes URL
14 of 141
3 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
1 1447 4.88% 80518 13.79% /default.htm

2 439 1.48% 135493 23.21% /index-2.html
3 225 0.76% 17140 2.94% /gpage13.html
4 207 0.70% 96675 16.56% /gpage30.html
5 68 0.23% 15264 2.62% /gpage16.html
6 67 0.23% 7679 1.32% /gpage28.html
7 63 0.21% 4768 0.82% /gpage38.html
8 62 0.21% 36878 6.32% /gpage22.html
9 60 0.20% 7791 1.33% /gpage33.html
10 60 0.20% 3078 0.53% /gpage34.html
11 55 0.19% 6597 1.13% /gpage20.html
12 55 0.19% 8024 1.37% /gpage41.html
13 54 0.18% 5604 0.96% /gpage24.html
14 54 0.18% 2515 0.43% /gpage25.html
15 54 0.18% 5484 0.94% /gpage27.html
16 53 0.18% 3242 0.56% /gpage1.html
17 53 0.18% 2011 0.34% /gpage14.html
18 52 0.18% 6335 1.09% /gpage8.html
19 51 0.17% 3985 0.68% /gpage2.html
20 51 0.17% 2189 0.38% /gpage7.html
21 50 0.17% 7042 1.21% /gpage19.html
22 50 0.17% 2650 0.45% /gpage29.html
24 48 0.16% 4220 0.72% /gpage26.html
25 47 0.16% 2817 0.48% /gpage3.html
26 46 0.16% 4911 0.84% /gpage18.html
27 46 0.16% 4867 0.83% /gpage21.html
28 45 0.15% 11621 1.99% /gpage17.html
29 45 0.15% 2555 0.44% /gpage31.html
30 45 0.15% 2228 0.38% /gpage32.html
31 45 0.15% 2850 0.49% /gpage37.html
32 45 0.15% 2176 0.37% /gpage39.html
33 44 0.15% 5471 0.94% /gpage10.html
34 44 0.15% 1872 0.32% /gpage36.html
35 44 0.15% 6783 1.16% /gpage9.html
36 42 0.14% 1724 0.30% /gpage12.html
37 42 0.14% 1941 0.33% /gpage6.html
38 41 0.14% 2552 0.44% /gpage23.html
39 41 0.14% 1448 0.25% /gpage40.html
40 41 0.14% 3853 0.66% /gpage5.html
41 40 0.13% 1554 0.27% /gpage15.html
42 39 0.13% 1694 0.29% /gpage4.html
43 38 0.13% 1761 0.30% /gpage11.html
44 28 0.09% 8826 1.51% /
45 1 0.00% 11 0.00% /splash_screen.html

# Hits KBytes URL

15 of 141
4 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
1 439 1.48% 135493 23.21% /index-2.html
2 207 0.70% 96675 16.56% /gpage30.html
3 1447 4.88% 80518 13.79% /default.htm
4 62 0.21% 36878 6.32% /gpage22.html
5 225 0.76% 17140 2.94% /gpage13.html
6 68 0.23% 15264 2.62% /gpage16.html
7 45 0.15% 11621 1.99% /gpage17.html
8 28 0.09% 8826 1.51% /
9 55 0.19% 8024 1.37% /gpage41.html
10 60 0.20% 7791 1.33% /gpage33.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1447 4.88% 893 35.16% /default.htm
2 439 1.48% 351 13.82% /index-2.html
3 225 0.76% 171 6.73% /gpage13.html
4 207 0.70% 166 6.54% /gpage30.html
5 67 0.23% 43 1.69% /gpage28.html
6 68 0.23% 40 1.57% /gpage16.html
7 62 0.21% 39 1.54% /gpage22.html
8 63 0.21% 33 1.30% /gpage38.html
9 60 0.20% 32 1.26% /gpage34.html
10 53 0.18% 27 1.06% /gpage1.html
11 54 0.18% 27 1.06% /gpage25.html
12 55 0.19% 26 1.02% /gpage20.html
13 54 0.18% 26 1.02% /gpage24.html
14 50 0.17% 25 0.98% /gpage19.html
15 60 0.20% 25 0.98% /gpage33.html
16 52 0.18% 25 0.98% /gpage8.html
17 53 0.18% 24 0.94% /gpage14.html
19 42 0.14% 23 0.91% /gpage12.html
20 46 0.16% 23 0.91% /gpage18.html
21 51 0.17% 23 0.91% /gpage2.html
22 50 0.17% 23 0.91% /gpage29.html
23 47 0.16% 23 0.91% /gpage3.html
24 45 0.15% 23 0.91% /gpage37.html
25 41 0.14% 23 0.91% /gpage5.html
26 28 0.09% 22 0.87% /
27 46 0.16% 22 0.87% /gpage21.html
28 48 0.16% 22 0.87% /gpage26.html
29 54 0.18% 22 0.87% /gpage27.html
30 45 0.15% 22 0.87% /gpage31.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1447 4.88% 1191 41.47% /default.htm

16 of 141
5 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
2 439 1.48% 360 12.53% /index-2.html
3 225 0.76% 171 5.95% /gpage13.html
4 207 0.70% 161 5.61% /gpage30.html
5 68 0.23% 43 1.50% /gpage16.html
6 62 0.21% 38 1.32% /gpage22.html
7 60 0.20% 34 1.18% /gpage34.html
8 63 0.21% 34 1.18% /gpage38.html
10 67 0.23% 32 1.11% /gpage28.html
11 60 0.20% 31 1.08% /gpage33.html
12 55 0.19% 30 1.04% /gpage20.html
13 54 0.18% 30 1.04% /gpage24.html
14 54 0.18% 28 0.97% /gpage25.html
15 54 0.18% 28 0.97% /gpage27.html

1 2678 9.03% 212 5.19% 70207 12.03% 174 5.94% 108.11.207.18

2 1818 6.13% 144 3.52% 48013 8.23% 126 4.30% 74.99.172.251
3 1435 4.84% 19 0.47% 4698 0.80% 6 0.20% 73.187.70.15
4 1354 4.57% 13 0.32% 9024 1.55% 12 0.41% 86.180.214.235
5 1306 4.41% 144 3.52% 13010 2.23% 121 4.13% 24.128.107.196
6 1218 4.11% 14 0.34% 3153 0.54% 1 0.03% 75.150.180.234
7 978 3.30% 6 0.15% 4784 0.82% 6 0.20% 31.51.93.238
8 652 2.20% 7 0.17% 4724 0.81% 6 0.20% 109.146.255.207
9 611 2.06% 8 0.20% 2014 0.34% 1 0.03% 73.233.13.88
10 592 2.00% 4 0.10% 3084 0.53% 4 0.14% 86.180.214.201
11 414 1.40% 3 0.07% 896 0.15% 1 0.03% 162.27.9.20
12 394 1.33% 2 0.05% 1063 0.18% 2 0.07% 161.150.176.2
13 392 1.32% 3 0.07% 1326 0.23% 1 0.03% 73.195.104.165
14 261 0.88% 1 0.02% 969 0.17% 1 0.03% 86.180.214.104
15 259 0.87% 4 0.10% 1223 0.21% 1 0.03% 24.104.68.94
16 244 0.82% 6 0.15% 1389 0.24% 1 0.03% 213.162.105.165
17 233 0.79% 3 0.07% 970 0.17% 1 0.03% 71.254.123.249
18 228 0.77% 3 0.07% 811 0.14% 1 0.03% 73.130.155.48
19 221 0.75% 2 0.05% 1411 0.24% 2 0.07% 81.151.196.221
20 208 0.70% 54 1.32% 9445 1.62% 41 1.40% 207.46.13.21
21 203 0.68% 12 0.29% 2263 0.39% 12 0.41% 85.25.210.234
22 199 0.67% 2 0.05% 467 0.08% 1 0.03% 70.196.140.193
23 196 0.66% 3 0.07% 580 0.10% 3 0.10% 76.109.160.184
24 195 0.66% 6 0.15% 729 0.12% 1 0.03% 73.130.235.229
25 187 0.63% 94 2.30% 8277 1.42% 56 1.91% 40.77.167.2
26 174 0.59% 3 0.07% 937 0.16% 1 0.03% 174.60.208.188
27 171 0.58% 1 0.02% 346 0.06% 1 0.03% 70.212.128.199
28 166 0.56% 9 0.22% 990 0.17% 9 0.31% 62.138.0.25
29 163 0.55% 4 0.10% 756 0.13% 1 0.03% 50.202.58.42
30 160 0.54% 1 0.02% 339 0.06% 1 0.03% 73.175.190.141
31 146 0.49% 3 0.07% 760 0.13% 1 0.03% 94.212.106.210
32 136 0.46% 1 0.02% 355 0.06% 1 0.03% 95.147.227.151

17 of 141
6 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
33 135 0.46% 129 3.16% 13043 2.23% 3 0.10% 70.55.53.26
34 132 0.45% 61 1.49% 4828 0.83% 49 1.67% 207.46.13.129
35 128 0.43% 3 0.07% 605 0.10% 3 0.10% 85.25.210.41
36 124 0.42% 3 0.07% 649 0.11% 1 0.03% 166.137.244.49
37 123 0.41% 2 0.05% 604 0.10% 1 0.03% 99.9.22.202
38 116 0.39% 29 0.71% 4803 0.82% 19 0.65% 157.55.39.218
39 116 0.39% 2 0.05% 576 0.10% 1 0.03% 38.98.220.16
40 114 0.38% 1 0.02% 259 0.04% 1 0.03% 144.208.101.187
41 114 0.38% 2 0.05% 415 0.07% 2 0.07% 208.87.234.201
42 114 0.38% 2 0.05% 318 0.05% 1 0.03% 62.210.105.136
43 113 0.38% 2 0.05% 496 0.08% 1 0.03% 173.88.222.113
44 113 0.38% 2 0.05% 570 0.10% 1 0.03% 70.199.205.22
45 109 0.37% 1 0.02% 297 0.05% 1 0.03% 66.87.97.223
46 96 0.32% 1 0.02% 314 0.05% 1 0.03% 214.37.45.6
47 91 0.31% 1 0.02% 473 0.08% 1 0.03% 207.252.173.10
48 91 0.31% 7 0.17% 3740 0.64% 6 0.20% 73.192.141.252
49 88 0.30% 58 1.42% 4552 0.78% 30 1.02% 207.46.13.90
50 88 0.30% 43 1.05% 5167 0.89% 1 0.03% 54.212.206.169

1 2678 9.03% 212 5.19% 70207 12.03% 174 5.94% 108.11.207.18
2 1818 6.13% 144 3.52% 48013 8.23% 126 4.30% 74.99.172.251
3 135 0.46% 129 3.16% 13043 2.23% 3 0.10% 70.55.53.26
4 1306 4.41% 144 3.52% 13010 2.23% 121 4.13% 24.128.107.196
5 208 0.70% 54 1.32% 9445 1.62% 41 1.40% 207.46.13.21
6 1354 4.57% 13 0.32% 9024 1.55% 12 0.41% 86.180.214.235
7 187 0.63% 94 2.30% 8277 1.42% 56 1.91% 40.77.167.2
8 87 0.29% 86 2.10% 6935 1.19% 3 0.10% 112.26.164.53
9 67 0.23% 38 0.93% 6311 1.08% 25 0.85% 157.55.39.143
10 67 0.23% 36 0.88% 5481 0.94% 24 0.82% 40.77.167.48

# Hits Referrer
1 53 0.18% http://98.139.21.31/search/srpcache
6 5 0.02% http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt
7 5 0.02% http://www.google.com/
8 5 0.02% http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir
9 3 0.01% google.com
10 3 0.01% http://wordpress.org/
12 3 0.01% https://www.google.co.uk/
13 2 0.01% android-app://com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox

18 of 141
7 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
14 2 0.01% http://activityinbox.com/blog/next-generation-mail-toward-a-personal-social-crm/
15 2 0.01% http://search.aol.com/aol/search
16 2 0.01% https://duckduckgo.com/
17 2 0.01% https://t.co/WUhmBwQepj
18 2 0.01% https://www.google.rw/
19 2 0.01% https://www.linkedin.com/slink
20 2 0.01% https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/
21 1 0.00% http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5531a932b4b35f7449c28ba7633aad27
22 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog
23 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/
24 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/author/nicolas-guillaume/
25 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/category/knowledge-workers-efficiency/
26 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/category/next-generation-mail-social-personal-crm/
27 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/productivit-et-organisation-des-activits-collaboratives/feed/
28 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/social_networki/
29 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/library/img/icons/mail.png
30 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/library/img/icons/twitter.png
31 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/library/js/methods.js
32 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/library/js/vendor/modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
33 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/library/js/vendor/selectivizr-min.js
34 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/library/js/vendor/social-share.js
35 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-content/themes/tiga/style.css
36 1 0.00% http://activityinbox.com/blog/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js
37 1 0.00% http://amgasparin.blogspot.ca/
38 1 0.00% http://articledailys.com/
39 1 0.00% http://articledailys.com/'
40 1 0.00% http://blog.gaborcselle.com/2010/02/how-to-replace-imap.html
41 1 0.00% http://fr.anyoption.com/
42 1 0.00% http://fr.anyoption.com/'
43 1 0.00% http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Messaging_and_Presence_Protocol
44 1 0.00% http://kosmetyczka.stalowa-wola.pl/
45 1 0.00% http://lucaslongo.com/wp-content/themes/writr/js/navigation.js
46 1 0.00% http://lucaslongo.com/wp-includes/js/underscore.min.js
47 1 0.00% http://mailchimp.com/
49 1 0.00% http://nicolasguillaume.typepad.fr/nicolas_guillaume/2011/05/la-fin-du-mail-dans-larchitecture-de-la-productivit-collaborative.html
50 1 0.00% http://realestateofbelize.com/page/helpful-links-caye-caulker-belize-real-estate-for-sale

1 1 100.00% 9 mmpistan

# Hits User Agent
1 14863 50.13% Safari (OSX)


19 of 141
8 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
4 1485 5.01% MobileSafari/602.1 CFNetwork/808.2.16 Darwin/16.3.0
7 347 1.17% Device: Samsung Mobile Phone
12 137 0.46% Programming: Java-based client
15 51 0.17% netEstate NE Crawler (+http://www.website-datenbank.de/)
16 48 0.16% Safari/12602.2.14.0.7 CFNetwork/807.1.3 Darwin/16.1.0 (x86_64)
17 46 0.16% python-requests/2.7.0 CPython/2.7.6 Linux/3.13.0-107-generic
21 32 0.11% Opera
23 23 0.08% Firefox 3
24 20 0.07% default
25 18 0.06% Twitterbot/1.0
26 13 0.04% Firefox 2
27 10 0.03% okhttp/3.2.0
29 5 0.02% Experibot_v1 [bit.ly/2bLMJdw]
30 4 0.01% MetaURI API/2.0 +metauri.com

1 21105 71.19% 2554 62.51% 408722 70.03% United States

2 4866 16.41% 98 2.40% 33050 5.66% Great Britain (UK)
3 775 2.61% 210 5.14% 25116 4.30% Germany

20 of 141
9 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM
4 662 2.23% 517 12.65% 43786 7.50% China
5 380 1.28% 189 4.63% 22814 3.91% Canada
6 278 0.94% 30 0.73% 2237 0.38% India
7 255 0.86% 100 2.45% 9636 1.65% France
8 254 0.86% 18 0.44% 1735 0.30% Czech Republic
9 171 0.58% 17 0.42% 2082 0.36% Netherlands
11 65 0.22% 7 0.17% 526 0.09% Australia
12 63 0.21% 2 0.05% 257 0.04% Rwanda
13 53 0.18% 3 0.07% 367 0.06% Austria
14 49 0.17% 25 0.61% 1998 0.34% Brazil
15 42 0.14% 17 0.42% 1899 0.33% Poland
16 36 0.12% 18 0.44% 1124 0.19% Romania
17 34 0.11% 22 0.54% 1759 0.30% Argentina
18 29 0.10% 14 0.34% 876 0.15% Philippines
19 26 0.09% 15 0.37% 901 0.15% Spain
20 22 0.07% 11 0.27% 687 0.12% Serbia
22 20 0.07% 10 0.24% 624 0.11% Italy
23 20 0.07% 10 0.24% 624 0.11% Malaysia
24 17 0.06% 16 0.39% 1847 0.32% Ireland
25 14 0.05% 7 0.17% 437 0.07% Belgium
26 14 0.05% 7 0.17% 437 0.07% Hungary
27 14 0.05% 12 0.29% 1786 0.31% Ukraine
28 13 0.04% 5 0.12% 449 0.08% Hong Kong
29 12 0.04% 6 0.15% 375 0.06% Greece
30 12 0.04% 6 0.15% 375 0.06% Pakistan

21 of 141
10 of 10 2/9/2017 6:21 AM

22 of 141

Summary Period: February 2017
Generated 09-Feb-2017 04:20 GMT
Monthly Statistics for February 2017

Total Hits 5904
Total Files 1092
Total Pages 1177
Total Visits 758
Total KBytes 153712
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 54 94
Code 200 - OK 18.50% 1092
Code 404 - Not Found 80.88% 4775

23 of 141
1 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
Daily Statistics for February 2017

1 1677 28.40% 139 12.73% 154 13.08% 104 13.72% 91 20.87% 21809 14.19%
2 702 11.89% 133 12.18% 141 11.98% 107 14.12% 94 21.56% 18967 12.34%
3 617 10.45% 145 13.28% 154 13.08% 90 11.87% 81 18.58% 18564 12.08%
4 544 9.21% 136 12.45% 144 12.23% 81 10.69% 69 15.83% 17967 11.69%
5 419 7.10% 84 7.69% 91 7.73% 74 9.76% 62 14.22% 11734 7.63%
6 569 9.64% 201 18.41% 213 18.10% 104 13.72% 82 18.81% 25413 16.53%
7 605 10.25% 136 12.45% 144 12.23% 90 11.87% 79 18.12% 21956 14.28%
8 771 13.06% 118 10.81% 136 11.55% 109 14.38% 80 18.35% 17302 11.26%

24 of 141
2 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
Hourly Statistics for February 2017

Hour
0 73 588 9.96% 7 59 5.40% 7 60 5.10% 922 7377 4.80%
1 139 1115 18.89% 12 100 9.16% 13 104 8.84% 1810 14476 9.42%
2 19 153 2.59% 3 29 2.66% 3 30 2.55% 581 4648 3.02%
3 14 118 2.00% 3 27 2.47% 3 29 2.46% 364 2913 1.89%
4 25 204 3.46% 3 31 2.84% 4 35 2.97% 615 4917 3.20%
5 9 75 1.27% 3 25 2.29% 3 30 2.55% 666 5325 3.46%
6 6 53 0.90% 2 19 1.74% 2 23 1.95% 232 1854 1.21%
7 15 125 2.12% 8 71 6.50% 9 75 6.37% 1080 8638 5.62%
8 8 71 1.20% 3 27 2.47% 3 27 2.29% 329 2628 1.71%
9 9 76 1.29% 3 31 2.84% 4 34 2.89% 408 3263 2.12%
10 13 108 1.83% 4 39 3.57% 5 42 3.57% 594 4753 3.09%
11 21 169 2.86% 4 37 3.39% 5 44 3.74% 670 5359 3.49%
12 43 345 5.84% 9 76 6.96% 10 82 6.97% 1259 10070 6.55%
13 34 276 4.67% 7 56 5.13% 7 62 5.27% 808 6467 4.21%
14 28 225 3.81% 5 43 3.94% 6 50 4.25% 817 6534 4.25%
15 39 315 5.34% 9 73 6.68% 9 76 6.46% 1396 11172 7.27%
16 27 217 3.68% 6 55 5.04% 7 56 4.76% 906 7246 4.71%
17 16 132 2.24% 4 32 2.93% 4 38 3.23% 558 4460 2.90%
18 32 259 4.39% 3 25 2.29% 3 26 2.21% 690 5518 3.59%
19 48 389 6.59% 4 34 3.11% 4 38 3.23% 740 5916 3.85%
20 18 149 2.52% 4 37 3.39% 4 39 3.31% 740 5918 3.85%
21 47 382 6.47% 11 94 8.61% 12 99 8.41% 1479 11830 7.70%
22 17 136 2.30% 4 35 3.21% 4 36 3.06% 899 7190 4.68%
23 28 224 3.79% 4 37 3.39% 5 42 3.57% 655 5239 3.41%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 286 4.84% 16809 10.94% /default.htm

2 125 2.12% 38902 25.31% /index-2.html
3 71 1.20% 5410 3.52% /gpage13.html
4 48 0.81% 22645 14.73% /gpage30.html
6 22 0.37% 2187 1.42% /gpage5.html
7 20 0.34% 11662 7.59% /gpage22.html
8 20 0.34% 2686 1.75% /gpage33.html
9 19 0.32% 1439 0.94% /gpage38.html
10 18 0.30% 2160 1.41% /gpage28.html
11 18 0.30% 2535 1.65% /gpage41.html
12 17 0.29% 783 0.51% /gpage11.html
13 17 0.29% 3845 2.50% /gpage16.html
14 17 0.29% 3831 2.49% /gpage17.html
15 17 0.29% 745 0.48% /gpage25.html

25 of 141
3 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
16 17 0.29% 757 0.49% /gpage36.html
17 17 0.29% 1681 1.09% /gpage8.html
18 16 0.27% 689 0.45% /gpage12.html
19 16 0.27% 654 0.43% /gpage15.html
20 16 0.27% 2299 1.50% /gpage19.html
21 16 0.27% 1407 0.92% /gpage26.html
22 16 0.27% 883 0.57% /gpage29.html
23 16 0.27% 759 0.49% /gpage34.html
24 15 0.25% 919 0.60% /gpage3.html
25 15 0.25% 677 0.44% /gpage39.html
26 14 0.24% 1885 1.23% /gpage20.html
27 14 0.24% 1165 0.76% /gpage21.html
28 14 0.24% 545 0.35% /gpage32.html
29 14 0.24% 520 0.34% /gpage40.html
30 14 0.24% 679 0.44% /gpage6.html
31 14 0.24% 2208 1.44% /gpage9.html
32 13 0.22% 1428 0.93% /gpage24.html
33 13 0.22% 478 0.31% /gpage4.html
34 13 0.22% 569 0.37% /gpage7.html
35 12 0.20% 827 0.54% /gpage1.html
36 12 0.20% 697 0.45% /gpage37.html
37 11 0.19% 1433 0.93% /gpage10.html
38 11 0.19% 442 0.29% /gpage14.html
39 11 0.19% 739 0.48% /gpage23.html
40 11 0.19% 1183 0.77% /gpage27.html
41 11 0.19% 625 0.41% /gpage31.html
42 10 0.17% 830 0.54% /gpage2.html
43 8 0.14% 893 0.58% /gpage18.html
44 7 0.12% 1577 1.03% /

# Hits KBytes URL
1 125 2.12% 38902 25.31% /index-2.html
2 48 0.81% 22645 14.73% /gpage30.html
3 286 4.84% 16809 10.94% /default.htm
4 20 0.34% 11662 7.59% /gpage22.html
5 71 1.20% 5410 3.52% /gpage13.html
6 17 0.29% 3845 2.50% /gpage16.html
7 17 0.29% 3831 2.49% /gpage17.html
8 20 0.34% 2686 1.75% /gpage33.html
9 18 0.30% 2535 1.65% /gpage41.html
10 16 0.27% 2299 1.50% /gpage19.html

26 of 141
4 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
# Hits Visits URL
1 286 4.84% 240 33.20% /default.htm
2 125 2.12% 91 12.59% /index-2.html
3 71 1.20% 50 6.92% /gpage13.html
4 48 0.81% 41 5.67% /gpage30.html
5 20 0.34% 13 1.80% /gpage22.html
6 17 0.29% 12 1.66% /gpage25.html
7 20 0.34% 12 1.66% /gpage33.html
8 22 0.37% 12 1.66% /gpage5.html
9 18 0.30% 11 1.52% /gpage28.html
10 18 0.30% 11 1.52% /gpage41.html
11 17 0.29% 10 1.38% /gpage16.html
12 16 0.27% 10 1.38% /gpage19.html
13 17 0.29% 9 1.24% /gpage11.html
14 16 0.27% 9 1.24% /gpage15.html
15 17 0.29% 9 1.24% /gpage17.html
16 14 0.24% 9 1.24% /gpage21.html
17 16 0.27% 9 1.24% /gpage26.html
18 15 0.25% 9 1.24% /gpage3.html
20 16 0.27% 8 1.11% /gpage12.html
21 14 0.24% 8 1.11% /gpage20.html
22 13 0.22% 8 1.11% /gpage24.html
23 16 0.27% 8 1.11% /gpage29.html
24 14 0.24% 8 1.11% /gpage32.html
25 16 0.27% 8 1.11% /gpage34.html
26 15 0.25% 8 1.11% /gpage39.html
27 17 0.29% 8 1.11% /gpage8.html
28 7 0.12% 7 0.97% /
29 19 0.32% 7 0.97% /gpage38.html
30 14 0.24% 7 0.97% /gpage6.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 286 4.84% 257 34.68% /default.htm
2 125 2.12% 93 12.55% /index-2.html
3 71 1.20% 47 6.34% /gpage13.html
4 48 0.81% 39 5.26% /gpage30.html
6 22 0.37% 13 1.75% /gpage5.html
7 20 0.34% 12 1.62% /gpage22.html
8 17 0.29% 11 1.48% /gpage16.html
9 20 0.34% 11 1.48% /gpage33.html
10 19 0.32% 11 1.48% /gpage38.html
11 17 0.29% 10 1.35% /gpage11.html

27 of 141
5 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
12 16 0.27% 10 1.35% /gpage19.html
13 17 0.29% 10 1.35% /gpage25.html
14 16 0.27% 10 1.35% /gpage34.html
15 17 0.29% 9 1.21% /gpage17.html

1 1219 20.65% 99 9.07% 32921 21.42% 76 10.03% 108.11.207.18
2 1105 18.72% 19 1.74% 3778 2.46% 2 0.26% 174.54.20.13
3 357 6.05% 39 3.57% 3529 2.30% 29 3.83% 24.128.107.196
4 120 2.03% 3 0.27% 517 0.34% 1 0.13% 166.137.12.129
5 119 2.02% 4 0.37% 444 0.29% 2 0.26% 136.243.67.139
6 111 1.88% 2 0.18% 374 0.24% 1 0.13% 40.143.153.179
7 110 1.86% 1 0.09% 250 0.16% 1 0.13% 166.137.90.93
8 109 1.85% 1 0.09% 250 0.16% 1 0.13% 63.66.64.247
9 101 1.71% 28 2.56% 5533 3.60% 20 2.64% 207.46.13.128
10 98 1.66% 48 4.40% 5824 3.79% 1 0.13% 158.69.229.6
11 94 1.59% 86 7.88% 8404 5.47% 2 0.26% 173.226.191.48
12 86 1.46% 39 3.57% 4054 2.64% 27 3.56% 157.55.39.41
13 78 1.32% 2 0.18% 456 0.30% 1 0.13% 174.60.208.188
14 75 1.27% 1 0.09% 206 0.13% 1 0.13% 74.93.49.177
15 63 1.07% 2 0.18% 226 0.15% 1 0.13% 216.155.131.72
16 61 1.03% 1 0.09% 164 0.11% 1 0.13% 198.7.141.2
17 60 1.02% 1 0.09% 164 0.11% 1 0.13% 92.11.195.190
18 58 0.98% 1 0.09% 161 0.10% 1 0.13% 216.255.171.116
19 58 0.98% 1 0.09% 167 0.11% 1 0.13% 66.87.115.95
20 57 0.97% 1 0.09% 159 0.10% 1 0.13% 207.244.83.198
21 56 0.95% 1 0.09% 412 0.27% 1 0.13% 166.137.240.114
22 56 0.95% 1 0.09% 151 0.10% 1 0.13% 174.201.6.127
23 53 0.90% 22 2.01% 1834 1.19% 19 2.51% 207.46.13.87
24 47 0.80% 43 3.94% 5159 3.36% 1 0.13% 5.9.98.130
25 38 0.64% 4 0.37% 388 0.25% 3 0.40% 207.46.13.13
26 37 0.63% 17 1.56% 1485 0.97% 14 1.85% 40.77.167.31
27 35 0.59% 32 2.93% 3498 2.28% 1 0.13% 208.43.225.84
28 34 0.58% 0 0.00% 60 0.04% 0 0.00% 85.25.210.234
29 31 0.53% 0 0.00% 54 0.04% 0 0.00% 199.30.25.149
30 31 0.53% 6 0.55% 1416 0.92% 5 0.66% 207.46.13.71
31 29 0.49% 3 0.27% 274 0.18% 3 0.40% 174.192.2.114
32 27 0.46% 3 0.27% 1582 1.03% 3 0.40% 166.137.118.119
33 27 0.46% 18 1.65% 2306 1.50% 8 1.06% 17.142.154.222
34 27 0.46% 3 0.27% 1582 1.03% 3 0.40% 50.27.104.14
35 26 0.44% 2 0.18% 1069 0.70% 2 0.26% 73.192.141.252
36 24 0.41% 9 0.82% 708 0.46% 5 0.66% 207.46.13.144
37 24 0.41% 0 0.00% 42 0.03% 0 0.00% 85.25.210.41
38 23 0.39% 17 1.56% 2478 1.61% 16 2.11% 66.249.79.68

28 of 141
6 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
39 22 0.37% 9 0.82% 569 0.37% 7 0.92% 141.8.143.136
40 22 0.37% 3 0.27% 262 0.17% 3 0.40% 174.192.8.234
41 22 0.37% 0 0.00% 39 0.03% 0 0.00% 62.138.0.25
42 20 0.34% 13 1.19% 1049 0.68% 9 1.19% 157.55.39.180
43 18 0.30% 12 1.10% 1761 1.15% 10 1.32% 157.55.39.204
44 18 0.30% 2 0.18% 659 0.43% 1 0.13% 166.170.0.20
45 18 0.30% 8 0.73% 1507 0.98% 8 1.06% 207.46.13.116
46 18 0.30% 10 0.92% 874 0.57% 10 1.32% 66.249.79.127
47 16 0.27% 2 0.18% 168 0.11% 2 0.26% 40.77.167.29
48 16 0.27% 11 1.01% 738 0.48% 13 1.72% 66.249.79.73
49 15 0.25% 7 0.64% 2056 1.34% 5 0.66% 40.77.167.81
50 15 0.25% 10 0.92% 1466 0.95% 9 1.19% 68.180.229.33

1 1219 20.65% 99 9.07% 32921 21.42% 76 10.03% 108.11.207.18
2 94 1.59% 86 7.88% 8404 5.47% 2 0.26% 173.226.191.48
3 98 1.66% 48 4.40% 5824 3.79% 1 0.13% 158.69.229.6
4 101 1.71% 28 2.56% 5533 3.60% 20 2.64% 207.46.13.128
5 47 0.80% 43 3.94% 5159 3.36% 1 0.13% 5.9.98.130
6 86 1.46% 39 3.57% 4054 2.64% 27 3.56% 157.55.39.41
7 1105 18.72% 19 1.74% 3778 2.46% 2 0.26% 174.54.20.13
8 357 6.05% 39 3.57% 3529 2.30% 29 3.83% 24.128.107.196
9 35 0.59% 32 2.93% 3498 2.28% 1 0.13% 208.43.225.84
10 23 0.39% 17 1.56% 2478 1.61% 16 2.11% 66.249.79.68

# Hits Referrer
2 6 0.10% http://burger-imperia.com/
3 5 0.08% http://pizza-tycoon.com/
4 3 0.05% http://pizza-imperia.com/
5 2 0.03% http://hundejo.com/
12 1 0.02% http://www.netcraft.com/survey/
13 1 0.02% https://google.ru/
14 1 0.02% https://t.co/IWpbUWFdIf

29 of 141
7 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM

# Hits User Agent
1 2652 44.92% Safari (OSX)

9 53 0.90% Netscape
11 24 0.41% Safari/12602.4.8 CFNetwork/807.2.14 Darwin/16.4.0 (x86_64)
12 7 0.12% Firefox 2
13 6 0.10% Opera
17 4 0.07% Spider: Netcraft Web Survey
19 2 0.03% Catch crawler/1.0 (Catch crawler; https://www.linkedin.com/; wkrupa@linkedin.com)
20 2 0.03% Firefox 1
21 2 0.03% Grammarly/1.0 (http://www.grammarly.com)
25 1 0.02% Scrapy/1.3.0 (+http://scrapy.org)
26 1 0.02% crawler4j (http://code.google.com/p/crawler4j/)
28 1 0.02% www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

30 of 141
8 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM

1 5115 86.64% 739 67.67% 115699 75.27% United States
2 280 4.74% 63 5.77% 8301 5.40% Germany
3 172 2.91% 146 13.37% 13102 8.52% China
4 111 1.88% 60 5.49% 7978 5.19% Canada
5 65 1.10% 5 0.46% 1314 0.85% Great Britain (UK)
6 42 0.71% 0 0.00% 41 0.03% Czech Republic
7 38 0.64% 30 2.75% 2902 1.89% France
8 17 0.29% 17 1.56% 1031 0.67% Anonymous Proxy
9 8 0.14% 4 0.37% 250 0.16% India
10 7 0.12% 4 0.37% 248 0.16% Netherlands
11 6 0.10% 3 0.27% 187 0.12% Brazil
12 6 0.10% 4 0.37% 365 0.24% Romania
14 3 0.05% 1 0.09% 63 0.04% Hong Kong
15 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Australia
16 2 0.03% 2 0.18% 131 0.09% Bangladesh
17 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Bulgaria
18 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Greece
19 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Croatia
20 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Iraq
21 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Italy
22 2 0.03% 2 0.18% 524 0.34% Latvia
23 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Morocco
24 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Norway
25 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% New Zealand
26 2 0.03% 1 0.09% 62 0.04% Pakistan
27 1 0.02% 1 0.09% 513 0.33% Finland
28 1 0.02% 1 0.09% 61 0.04% Japan
29 1 0.02% 1 0.09% 144 0.09% Poland
30 1 0.02% 1 0.09% 61 0.04% Ukraine

31 of 141
9 of 9 2/9/2017 6:22 AM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - December... http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201612.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015

Summary Period: December 2016
Generated 01-Jan-2017 01:01 GMT
Monthly Statistics for December 2016

Total Hits 21836
Total Files 4568
Total Pages 5443
Total Visits 3124
Total KBytes 595590
. Avg Max
Code 200 - OK 20.92% 4568
Code 404 - Not Found 78.69% 17182
WEBSITE STATISTICS
11 of 141
13
32 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
1 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
Daily Statistics for December 2016

1 538 2.46% 97 2.12% 160 2.94% 75 2.40% 55 3.16% 19394 3.26%
2 536 2.45% 92 2.01% 114 2.09% 85 2.72% 59 3.39% 15362 2.58%
3 484 2.22% 119 2.61% 138 2.54% 80 2.56% 66 3.80% 15788 2.65%
4 349 1.60% 88 1.93% 89 1.64% 80 2.56% 55 3.16% 14109 2.37%
5 975 4.47% 150 3.28% 169 3.10% 84 2.69% 57 3.28% 25483 4.28%
6 571 2.61% 134 2.93% 145 2.66% 111 3.55% 102 5.87% 18048 3.03%
7 518 2.37% 86 1.88% 96 1.76% 83 2.66% 67 3.85% 14851 2.49%
8 535 2.45% 83 1.82% 91 1.67% 76 2.43% 70 4.03% 12590 2.11%
9 496 2.27% 192 4.20% 212 3.89% 66 2.11% 64 3.68% 21733 3.65%
10 437 2.00% 111 2.43% 120 2.20% 79 2.53% 74 4.26% 15152 2.54%
11 803 3.68% 135 2.96% 136 2.50% 80 2.56% 86 4.95% 15937 2.68%
12 1464 6.70% 128 2.80% 138 2.54% 105 3.36% 123 7.07% 20330 3.41%
13 1068 4.89% 119 2.61% 124 2.28% 71 2.27% 68 3.91% 19545 3.28%
14 1210 5.54% 150 3.28% 156 2.87% 91 2.91% 111 6.38% 20847 3.50%
15 908 4.16% 222 4.86% 240 4.41% 114 3.65% 97 5.58% 28455 4.78%
16 989 4.53% 155 3.39% 187 3.44% 119 3.81% 94 5.41% 21456 3.60%
17 524 2.40% 185 4.05% 224 4.12% 103 3.30% 98 5.64% 22864 3.84%
18 464 2.12% 98 2.15% 130 2.39% 95 3.04% 78 4.49% 11193 1.88%
19 841 3.85% 385 8.43% 436 8.01% 113 3.62% 89 5.12% 45351 7.61%
20 897 4.11% 142 3.11% 189 3.47% 130 4.16% 106 6.10% 19630 3.30%
21 598 2.74% 143 3.13% 203 3.73% 129 4.13% 112 6.44% 16197 2.72%
22 867 3.97% 134 2.93% 182 3.34% 133 4.26% 134 7.71% 17658 2.96%
23 570 2.61% 111 2.43% 139 2.55% 92 2.94% 97 5.58% 13801 2.32%
WEBSITE STATISTICS
12 of 141
14
33 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
2 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
24 831 3.81% 112 2.45% 134 2.46% 98 3.14% 88 5.06% 14888 2.50%
25 598 2.74% 313 6.85% 346 6.36% 114 3.65% 92 5.29% 31040 5.21%
26 619 2.83% 116 2.54% 152 2.79% 104 3.33% 95 5.46% 14862 2.50%
27 564 2.58% 167 3.66% 210 3.86% 115 3.68% 95 5.46% 20065 3.37%
28 573 2.62% 165 3.61% 216 3.97% 127 4.07% 112 6.44% 17568 2.95%
29 832 3.81% 167 3.66% 219 4.02% 131 4.19% 117 6.73% 18439 3.10%
30 512 2.34% 148 3.24% 193 3.55% 123 3.94% 97 5.58% 18238 3.06%
31 665 3.05% 121 2.65% 155 2.85% 119 3.81% 107 6.15% 14714 2.47%
Hourly Statistics for December 2016

Hour
0 22 689 3.16% 3 114 2.50% 4 138 2.54% 562 17416 2.92%
1 31 975 4.47% 4 124 2.71% 4 150 2.76% 652 20219 3.39%
2 32 1018 4.66% 6 210 4.60% 7 236 4.34% 888 27513 4.62%
3 40 1264 5.79% 13 425 9.30% 14 452 8.30% 1774 54996 9.23%
4 22 687 3.15% 5 157 3.44% 5 183 3.36% 583 18078 3.04%
5 18 564 2.58% 9 280 6.13% 10 323 5.93% 983 30477 5.12%
6 26 812 3.72% 7 244 5.34% 8 273 5.02% 875 27113 4.55%
7 26 833 3.81% 5 166 3.63% 6 188 3.45% 664 20593 3.46%
8 18 559 2.56% 5 164 3.59% 6 210 3.86% 641 19872 3.34%
9 23 715 3.27% 4 128 2.80% 5 163 2.99% 525 16271 2.73%
10 20 631 2.89% 4 147 3.22% 5 183 3.36% 667 20686 3.47%
11 27 856 3.92% 4 151 3.31% 5 185 3.40% 668 20717 3.48%
12 22 702 3.21% 6 201 4.40% 7 240 4.41% 784 24304 4.08%
13 37 1177 5.39% 5 178 3.90% 7 219 4.02% 839 26018 4.37%
14 34 1076 4.93% 5 172 3.77% 6 213 3.91% 696 21566 3.62%
15 31 966 4.42% 4 128 2.80% 5 165 3.03% 584 18102 3.04%
16 27 843 3.86% 5 178 3.90% 7 226 4.15% 776 24067 4.04%
17 29 901 4.13% 6 202 4.42% 7 241 4.43% 878 27210 4.57%
18 28 874 4.00% 6 187 4.09% 7 217 3.99% 779 24138 4.05%
19 47 1477 6.76% 6 213 4.66% 8 258 4.74% 977 30283 5.08%
WEBSITE STATISTICS
13 of 141
15
34 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
3 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
20 34 1054 4.83% 6 213 4.66% 7 247 4.54% 872 27047 4.54%
21 34 1068 4.89% 9 281 6.15% 12 373 6.85% 1122 34781 5.84%
22 38 1190 5.45% 6 188 4.12% 7 220 4.04% 831 25750 4.32%
23 29 905 4.14% 3 117 2.56% 4 140 2.57% 593 18372 3.08%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1415 6.48% 85144 14.30% /default.htm
2 399 1.83% 124955 20.98% /index-2.html
3 216 0.99% 16153 2.71% /gpage13.html
4 205 0.94% 82419 13.84% /gpage30.html
5 115 0.53% 12481 2.10% /gpage28.html
6 107 0.49% 24776 4.16% /gpage16.html
7 87 0.40% 12634 2.12% /gpage41.html
8 82 0.38% 6131 1.03% /gpage38.html
9 81 0.37% 4225 0.71% /gpage34.html
10 79 0.36% 3680 0.62% /gpage25.html
11 78 0.36% 10605 1.78% /gpage33.html
12 72 0.33% 9605 1.61% /gpage20.html
13 72 0.33% 3164 0.53% /gpage36.html
14 71 0.33% 17620 2.96% /gpage17.html
15 71 0.33% 7419 1.25% /gpage27.html
16 70 0.32% 33344 5.60% /gpage22.html
17 67 0.31% 9724 1.63% /gpage19.html
18 66 0.30% 3192 0.54% /gpage39.html
19 65 0.30% 5815 0.98% /gpage26.html
20 63 0.29% 3990 0.67% /gpage37.html
21 58 0.27% 3828 0.64% /gpage23.html
22 58 0.27% 3092 0.52% /gpage29.html
23 57 0.26% 8867 1.49% /gpage9.html
24 56 0.26% 4483 0.75% /gpage2.html
25 56 0.26% 2723 0.46% /gpage32.html
26 55 0.25% 3792 0.64% /gpage1.html
27 55 0.25% 3067 0.51% /gpage31.html
28 53 0.24% 6785 1.14% /gpage8.html
29 51 0.23% 6511 1.09% /gpage10.html
30 50 0.23% 2044 0.34% /gpage15.html
31 50 0.23% 5188 0.87% /gpage21.html
32 49 0.22% 2085 0.35% /gpage4.html
33 48 0.22% 2068 0.35% /gpage12.html
34 48 0.22% 2878 0.48% /gpage3.html
35 48 0.22% 2058 0.35% /gpage7.html
36 47 0.22% 5164 0.87% /gpage24.html
37 46 0.21% 2104 0.35% /gpage11.html
38 46 0.21% 4799 0.81% /gpage18.html
WEBSITE STATISTICS
14 of 141
16
35 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
4 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
39 45 0.21% 2184 0.37% /gpage6.html
41 43 0.20% 1729 0.29% /gpage14.html
42 43 0.20% 4373 0.73% /gpage5.html
43 42 0.19% 1522 0.26% /gpage40.html
44 21 0.10% 6560 1.10% /

# Hits KBytes URL
1 399 1.83% 124955 20.98% /index-2.html

2 1415 6.48% 85144 14.30% /default.htm
3 205 0.94% 82419 13.84% /gpage30.html
4 70 0.32% 33344 5.60% /gpage22.html
5 107 0.49% 24776 4.16% /gpage16.html
6 71 0.33% 17620 2.96% /gpage17.html
7 216 0.99% 16153 2.71% /gpage13.html
8 87 0.40% 12634 2.12% /gpage41.html
9 115 0.53% 12481 2.10% /gpage28.html
10 78 0.36% 10605 1.78% /gpage33.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1415 6.48% 781 31.28% /default.htm
2 399 1.83% 285 11.41% /index-2.html
3 205 0.94% 153 6.13% /gpage30.html
4 216 0.99% 143 5.73% /gpage13.html
5 115 0.53% 63 2.52% /gpage28.html
6 107 0.49% 50 2.00% /gpage16.html
7 67 0.31% 45 1.80% /gpage19.html
8 82 0.38% 44 1.76% /gpage38.html
9 70 0.32% 41 1.64% /gpage22.html
10 79 0.36% 41 1.64% /gpage25.html
11 72 0.33% 38 1.52% /gpage20.html
12 87 0.40% 37 1.48% /gpage41.html
13 78 0.36% 33 1.32% /gpage33.html
14 81 0.37% 33 1.32% /gpage34.html
15 71 0.33% 32 1.28% /gpage17.html
16 56 0.26% 32 1.28% /gpage2.html
17 55 0.25% 30 1.20% /gpage1.html
18 58 0.27% 30 1.20% /gpage23.html
19 71 0.33% 30 1.20% /gpage27.html
20 57 0.26% 30 1.20% /gpage9.html
21 72 0.33% 29 1.16% /gpage36.html
WEBSITE STATISTICS
15 of 141
17
36 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
5 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
22 51 0.23% 28 1.12% /gpage10.html
23 50 0.23% 28 1.12% /gpage15.html
24 65 0.30% 28 1.12% /gpage26.html
25 66 0.30% 28 1.12% /gpage39.html
26 50 0.23% 27 1.08% /gpage21.html
28 47 0.22% 26 1.04% /gpage24.html
29 46 0.21% 24 0.96% /gpage11.html
30 53 0.24% 24 0.96% /gpage8.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1415 6.48% 1306 42.95% /default.htm
2 399 1.83% 293 9.63% /index-2.html
3 216 0.99% 147 4.83% /gpage13.html
4 205 0.94% 144 4.74% /gpage30.html
5 115 0.53% 69 2.27% /gpage28.html
6 107 0.49% 61 2.01% /gpage16.html
7 72 0.33% 44 1.45% /gpage20.html
8 70 0.32% 43 1.41% /gpage22.html
9 67 0.31% 40 1.32% /gpage19.html
10 79 0.36% 40 1.32% /gpage25.html
11 82 0.38% 40 1.32% /gpage38.html
12 87 0.40% 40 1.32% /gpage41.html
13 78 0.36% 38 1.25% /gpage33.html
14 58 0.27% 36 1.18% /gpage23.html
15 55 0.25% 33 1.09% /gpage1.html

1 3612 16.54% 288 6.30% 96300 16.17% 234 7.49% 74.99.172.251
2 1077 4.93% 111 2.43% 10152 1.70% 75 2.40% 24.128.107.196
3 509 2.33% 6 0.13% 2193 0.37% 2 0.06% 98.95.170.231
4 362 1.66% 4 0.09% 1100 0.18% 4 0.13% 73.175.190.141
5 337 1.54% 14 0.31% 2529 0.42% 2 0.06% 166.216.165.89
6 324 1.48% 160 3.50% 13041 2.19% 127 4.07% 207.46.13.94
7 286 1.31% 74 1.62% 11736 1.97% 60 1.92% 157.55.39.0
8 281 1.29% 267 5.85% 32159 5.40% 5 0.16% 144.76.74.43
9 279 1.28% 5 0.11% 1818 0.31% 2 0.06% 162.157.184.39
10 245 1.12% 1 0.02% 585 0.10% 1 0.03% 63.66.64.247
11 232 1.06% 26 0.57% 13386 2.25% 23 0.74% 50.27.102.202
12 230 1.05% 4 0.09% 2449 0.41% 4 0.13% 81.129.29.30
13 216 0.99% 3 0.07% 609 0.10% 2 0.06% 168.133.2.41
14 214 0.98% 17 0.37% 2673 0.45% 17 0.54% 85.25.210.234
WEBSITE STATISTICS
16 of 141
18
37 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
6 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
15 200 0.92% 1 0.02% 410 0.07% 1 0.03% 115.118.55.210
16 190 0.87% 3 0.07% 744 0.12% 1 0.03% 207.218.103.2
17 174 0.80% 2 0.04% 416 0.07% 1 0.03% 70.71.206.125
18 172 0.79% 3 0.07% 1836 0.31% 3 0.10% 81.151.195.116
19 168 0.77% 1 0.02% 353 0.06% 1 0.03% 81.21.82.87
20 146 0.67% 74 1.62% 6156 1.03% 57 1.82% 40.77.167.68
21 138 0.63% 4 0.09% 659 0.11% 1 0.03% 82.83.206.61
22 132 0.60% 129 2.82% 11193 1.88% 1 0.03% 54.67.111.245
23 132 0.60% 6 0.13% 958 0.16% 5 0.16% 62.138.0.25
24 129 0.59% 7 0.15% 639 0.11% 1 0.03% 166.216.165.78
25 129 0.59% 127 2.78% 12002 2.02% 1 0.03% 194.79.31.10
26 124 0.57% 2 0.04% 844 0.14% 2 0.06% 96.94.201.245
27 118 0.54% 4 0.09% 632 0.11% 2 0.06% 70.15.119.149
28 117 0.54% 2 0.04% 593 0.10% 2 0.06% 174.59.226.18
29 116 0.53% 2 0.04% 330 0.06% 1 0.03% 174.60.246.61
30 114 0.52% 1 0.02% 513 0.09% 1 0.03% 12.159.160.146
31 114 0.52% 2 0.04% 318 0.05% 2 0.06% 166.66.18.52
32 113 0.52% 2 0.04% 570 0.10% 1 0.03% 23.30.210.105
33 112 0.51% 41 0.90% 5659 0.95% 27 0.86% 157.55.39.54
34 110 0.50% 2 0.04% 333 0.06% 2 0.06% 168.133.61.135
35 110 0.50% 1 0.02% 311 0.05% 1 0.03% 63.66.64.244
36 109 0.50% 1 0.02% 428 0.07% 1 0.03% 65.113.111.197
37 109 0.50% 1 0.02% 250 0.04% 1 0.03% 99.99.165.20
38 98 0.45% 8 0.18% 4264 0.72% 8 0.26% 73.192.141.252
39 95 0.44% 1 0.02% 225 0.04% 1 0.03% 130.91.136.191
40 93 0.43% 76 1.66% 10112 1.70% 40 1.28% 68.180.228.237
41 92 0.42% 10 0.22% 906 0.15% 10 0.32% 174.192.27.219
42 92 0.42% 1 0.02% 220 0.04% 1 0.03% 88.198.43.125
43 83 0.38% 1 0.02% 657 0.11% 1 0.03% 186.188.105.192
44 74 0.34% 1 0.02% 204 0.03% 1 0.03% 141.214.17.236
45 72 0.33% 2 0.04% 753 0.13% 1 0.03% 173.67.161.33
46 72 0.33% 1 0.02% 201 0.03% 1 0.03% 71.113.7.110
47 63 0.29% 2 0.04% 360 0.06% 1 0.03% 173.23.103.192
48 63 0.29% 1 0.02% 424 0.07% 1 0.03% 50.152.120.25
49 63 0.29% 0 0.00% 110 0.02% 0 0.00% 82.80.230.228
50 62 0.28% 2 0.04% 227 0.04% 1 0.03% 112.98.193.9

1 3612 16.54% 288 6.30% 96300 16.17% 234 7.49% 74.99.172.251

2 281 1.29% 267 5.85% 32159 5.40% 5 0.16% 144.76.74.43
3 232 1.06% 26 0.57% 13386 2.25% 23 0.74% 50.27.102.202
4 324 1.48% 160 3.50% 13041 2.19% 127 4.07% 207.46.13.94
5 129 0.59% 127 2.78% 12002 2.02% 1 0.03% 194.79.31.10
6 286 1.31% 74 1.62% 11736 1.97% 60 1.92% 157.55.39.0
WEBSITE STATISTICS
17 of 141
19
38 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
7 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
7 132 0.60% 129 2.82% 11193 1.88% 1 0.03% 54.67.111.245
8 1077 4.93% 111 2.43% 10152 1.70% 75 2.40% 24.128.107.196
9 93 0.43% 76 1.66% 10112 1.70% 40 1.28% 68.180.228.237
10 146 0.67% 74 1.62% 6156 1.03% 57 1.82% 40.77.167.68

# Hits Referrer
2 10 0.05% http://fifa-coins.online
6 5 0.02% https://t.co/MpA1SoctTP
8 3 0.01% http://1-free-share-buttons.com
9 3 0.01% http://10.180.0.130:15871/cgi-bin/blockOptions.cgi
12 2 0.01% http://www.bing.com
15 2 0.01% https://t.co/aqDw82Xmeh
16 1 0.00% (null)
17 1 0.00% 216.239.136.229
19 1 0.00% android-app://com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox/https/www.google.com
21 1 0.00% http://google.com
22 1 0.00% http://kosmetyka.stalowa-wola.pl/index.html
23 1 0.00% http://m.baidu.com/s
24 1 0.00% http://m.facebook.com/
25 1 0.00% http://newslanc.com/what-happened-to-bill-keislings-columns/
26 1 0.00% http://pizza-tycoon.com/
27 1 0.00% http://search.seznam.cz/
28 1 0.00% http://www.baidu.com/s
29 1 0.00% http://www.google.com.my/search
31 1 0.00% https://www.google.az/
32 1 0.00% https://www.google.ca/
33 1 0.00% https://www.google.co.ve/

1 1 100.00% anything
WEBSITE STATISTICS
18 of 141
20
39 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
8 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015

# Hits User Agent
1 8783 40.22% Safari (OSX)
15 54 0.25% Firefox 3
18 26 0.12% Opera
19 21 0.10% Twitterbot/1.0
20 19 0.09% okhttp/3.2.0
21 17 0.08% Firefox 2
22 6 0.03% Experibot_v1 [bit.ly/2bLMJdw]
24 6 0.03% btcrawler
25 4 0.02% Firefox 1
29 3 0.01% SpamBot: Pretends to be Mozilla 3.0
30 2 0.01% CCBot/2.0 (http://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
WEBSITE STATISTICS
19 of 141
21
40 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
9 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015

1 16238 74.36% 2706 59.24% 391411 65.72% United States
2 1027 4.70% 380 8.32% 45815 7.69% Germany
3 569 2.61% 9 0.20% 1613 0.27% Czech Republic
4 542 2.48% 65 1.42% 11048 1.85% Great Britain (UK)
5 511 2.34% 47 1.03% 6911 1.16% Canada
6 500 2.29% 373 8.17% 37723 6.33% China
7 280 1.28% 40 0.88% 2848 0.48% India
8 241 1.10% 143 3.13% 15495 2.60% France
9 168 0.77% 1 0.02% 353 0.06% Azerbaijan
11 136 0.62% 52 1.14% 5781 0.97% Israel
12 130 0.60% 128 2.80% 12515 2.10% European Union
13 128 0.59% 28 0.61% 2070 0.35% Brazil
14 113 0.52% 2 0.04% 494 0.08% Virgin Islands (U.S.)
15 84 0.38% 45 0.99% 4805 0.81% Romania
16 83 0.38% 1 0.02% 657 0.11% Venezuela
17 76 0.35% 10 0.22% 750 0.13% Turkey
18 51 0.23% 28 0.61% 3377 0.57% Poland
19 45 0.21% 24 0.53% 2135 0.36% Netherlands
20 43 0.20% 23 0.50% 1417 0.24% Spain
21 38 0.17% 19 0.42% 1186 0.20% Philippines
22 37 0.17% 17 0.37% 3216 0.54% Ukraine
23 32 0.15% 18 0.39% 1117 0.19% Argentina
24 32 0.15% 16 0.35% 999 0.17% Italy
25 31 0.14% 16 0.35% 997 0.17% Serbia
27 26 0.12% 11 0.24% 792 0.13% Japan
28 26 0.12% 13 0.28% 812 0.14% Malaysia
WEBSITE STATISTICS
20 of 141
22
41 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
10 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
29 24 0.11% 13 0.28% 938 0.16% Indonesia
30 20 0.09% 8 0.18% 507 0.09% Pakistan
WEBSITE STATISTICS
21 of 141
23
42 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
11 of 11 1/10/2017 5:29 AM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - Novembe... http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201611.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015

Summary Period: November 2016
Generated 30-Nov-2016 01:09 GMT
Monthly Statistics for November 2016

Total Hits 19725
Total Files 3382
Total Pages 3840
Total Visits 2280
Total KBytes 496856
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 35 94
Code 200 - OK 17.15% 3382
Code 404 - Not Found 81.12% 16000
WEBSITE STATISTICS
22 of 141
24
43 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
1 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
Daily Statistics for November 2016

1 1132 5.74% 140 4.14% 144 3.75% 70 3.07% 62 6.00% 18311 3.69%
2 817 4.14% 82 2.42% 93 2.42% 72 3.16% 54 5.22% 11698 2.35%
3 812 4.12% 139 4.11% 141 3.67% 87 3.82% 65 6.29% 18921 3.81%
4 724 3.67% 218 6.45% 230 5.99% 96 4.21% 64 6.19% 28600 5.76%
5 655 3.32% 114 3.37% 122 3.18% 96 4.21% 67 6.48% 13292 2.68%
6 459 2.33% 99 2.93% 110 2.86% 65 2.85% 50 4.84% 14023 2.82%
7 506 2.57% 80 2.37% 83 2.16% 70 3.07% 64 6.19% 13279 2.67%
8 529 2.68% 74 2.19% 77 2.01% 70 3.07% 38 3.68% 14143 2.85%
9 743 3.77% 101 2.99% 105 2.73% 84 3.68% 74 7.16% 15828 3.19%
10 865 4.39% 110 3.25% 119 3.10% 69 3.03% 53 5.13% 16390 3.30%
11 693 3.51% 200 5.91% 203 5.29% 72 3.16% 50 4.84% 29478 5.93%
12 375 1.90% 109 3.22% 112 2.92% 57 2.50% 56 5.42% 16421 3.31%
13 354 1.79% 78 2.31% 82 2.14% 64 2.81% 55 5.32% 14753 2.97%
14 469 2.38% 61 1.80% 64 1.67% 55 2.41% 49 4.74% 9594 1.93%
15 1159 5.88% 152 4.49% 181 4.71% 108 4.74% 75 7.25% 22636 4.56%
16 1136 5.76% 127 3.76% 236 6.15% 121 5.31% 50 4.84% 24810 4.99%
17 695 3.52% 101 2.99% 218 5.68% 117 5.13% 62 6.00% 17865 3.60%
18 579 2.94% 122 3.61% 140 3.65% 98 4.30% 75 7.25% 20001 4.03%
19 221 1.12% 47 1.39% 57 1.48% 48 2.11% 38 3.68% 8326 1.68%
20 548 2.78% 79 2.34% 93 2.42% 76 3.33% 59 5.71% 11534 2.32%
21 1251 6.34% 72 2.13% 86 2.24% 69 3.03% 94 9.09% 11515 2.32%
22 839 4.25% 162 4.79% 171 4.45% 98 4.30% 72 6.96% 22069 4.44%
23 861 4.37% 378 11.18% 391 10.18% 95 4.17% 70 6.77% 49283 9.92%
WEBSITE STATISTICS
23 of 141
25
44 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
2 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
24 334 1.69% 84 2.48% 88 2.29% 68 2.98% 66 6.38% 10260 2.06%
25 977 4.95% 123 3.64% 133 3.46% 80 3.51% 54 5.22% 19102 3.84%
26 425 2.15% 85 2.51% 88 2.29% 81 3.55% 68 6.58% 11330 2.28%
27 333 1.69% 72 2.13% 80 2.08% 66 2.89% 53 5.13% 9910 1.99%
28 689 3.49% 87 2.57% 104 2.71% 74 3.25% 64 6.19% 9438 1.90%
29 545 2.76% 86 2.54% 89 2.32% 58 2.54% 49 4.74% 14046 2.83%
Hourly Statistics for November 2016

Hour
0 14 434 2.20% 2 80 2.37% 3 104 2.71% 411 11912 2.40%
1 23 684 3.47% 2 78 2.31% 2 82 2.14% 403 11693 2.35%
2 28 840 4.26% 4 139 4.11% 5 154 4.01% 775 22476 4.52%
3 19 565 2.86% 4 133 3.93% 5 164 4.27% 515 14926 3.00%
4 23 694 3.52% 3 92 2.72% 3 113 2.94% 452 13096 2.64%
5 18 547 2.77% 4 141 4.17% 5 167 4.35% 641 18592 3.74%
6 23 670 3.40% 4 128 3.78% 5 148 3.85% 669 19393 3.90%
7 9 282 1.43% 3 89 2.63% 3 106 2.76% 462 13403 2.70%
8 16 487 2.47% 3 95 2.81% 3 109 2.84% 383 11113 2.24%
9 17 516 2.62% 4 140 4.14% 5 150 3.91% 640 18571 3.74%
10 16 488 2.47% 6 189 5.59% 7 215 5.60% 923 26779 5.39%
11 20 590 2.99% 5 162 4.79% 6 183 4.77% 819 23738 4.78%
12 40 1162 5.89% 6 184 5.44% 7 214 5.57% 970 28119 5.66%
13 33 984 4.99% 4 139 4.11% 5 150 3.91% 760 22027 4.43%
14 26 764 3.87% 4 132 3.90% 5 155 4.04% 626 18162 3.66%
15 77 2235 11.33% 8 254 7.51% 9 276 7.19% 1244 36089 7.26%
16 42 1243 6.30% 7 227 6.71% 8 254 6.61% 1084 31441 6.33%
17 43 1257 6.37% 5 149 4.41% 5 162 4.22% 916 26570 5.35%
18 23 672 3.41% 3 93 2.75% 3 104 2.71% 493 14296 2.88%
19 38 1126 5.71% 5 169 5.00% 6 188 4.90% 804 23306 4.69%
20 35 1018 5.16% 6 196 5.80% 7 212 5.52% 877 25441 5.12%
21 27 788 3.99% 4 132 3.90% 4 144 3.75% 731 21187 4.26%
WEBSITE STATISTICS
24 of 141
26
45 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
3 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
22 31 916 4.64% 4 122 3.61% 4 140 3.65% 955 27696 5.57%
23 26 763 3.87% 4 119 3.52% 5 146 3.80% 580 16828 3.39%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 863 4.38% 51126 10.29% /default.htm
2 347 1.76% 105735 21.28% /index-2.html
3 213 1.08% 94760 19.07% /gpage30.html
4 81 0.41% 8641 1.74% /gpage28.html
5 80 0.41% 3402 0.68% /gpage25.html
6 79 0.40% 17302 3.48% /gpage16.html
7 73 0.37% 3306 0.67% /gpage34.html
8 72 0.37% 4727 0.95% /gpage13.html
9 71 0.36% 36382 7.32% /gpage22.html
10 70 0.35% 4772 0.96% /gpage38.html
12 68 0.34% 8257 1.66% /gpage19.html
13 65 0.33% 6036 1.21% /gpage21.html
14 62 0.31% 5715 1.15% /gpage24.html
15 62 0.31% 8332 1.68% /gpage9.html
16 61 0.31% 14048 2.83% /gpage17.html
17 59 0.30% 3518 0.71% /gpage1.html
18 59 0.30% 8267 1.66% /gpage41.html
19 59 0.30% 6788 1.37% /gpage8.html
20 56 0.28% 2282 0.46% /gpage6.html
21 55 0.28% 2941 0.59% /gpage3.html
22 55 0.28% 2140 0.43% /gpage36.html
23 54 0.27% 4625 0.93% /gpage27.html
24 54 0.27% 2897 0.58% /gpage31.html
25 53 0.27% 2651 0.53% /gpage29.html
26 53 0.27% 6449 1.30% /gpage33.html
27 51 0.26% 5730 1.15% /gpage10.html
28 51 0.26% 6059 1.22% /gpage20.html
29 51 0.26% 2033 0.41% /gpage39.html
30 50 0.25% 2725 0.55% /gpage37.html
31 49 0.25% 3571 0.72% /gpage2.html
32 49 0.25% 3940 0.79% /gpage26.html
33 48 0.24% 1799 0.36% /gpage15.html
34 48 0.24% 1339 0.27% /gpage40.html
35 47 0.24% 2955 0.59% /gpage23.html
36 47 0.24% 1982 0.40% /gpage32.html
37 47 0.24% 1602 0.32% /gpage4.html
38 47 0.24% 1709 0.34% /gpage7.html
39 46 0.23% 1958 0.39% /gpage11.html
40 46 0.23% 1767 0.36% /gpage12.html
WEBSITE STATISTICS
25 of 141
27
46 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
4 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
41 45 0.23% 1570 0.32% /gpage14.html
42 45 0.23% 4688 0.94% /gpage18.html
43 45 0.23% 3854 0.78% /gpage5.html
44 12 0.06% 3783 0.76% /

# Hits KBytes URL
1 347 1.76% 105735 21.28% /index-2.html
2 213 1.08% 94760 19.07% /gpage30.html
3 863 4.38% 51126 10.29% /default.htm
4 71 0.36% 36382 7.32% /gpage22.html
5 79 0.40% 17302 3.48% /gpage16.html
6 61 0.31% 14048 2.83% /gpage17.html
7 81 0.41% 8641 1.74% /gpage28.html
8 62 0.31% 8332 1.68% /gpage9.html
9 59 0.30% 8267 1.66% /gpage41.html
10 68 0.34% 8257 1.66% /gpage19.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 863 4.38% 707 31.75% /default.htm
2 347 1.76% 260 11.67% /index-2.html
3 213 1.08% 162 7.27% /gpage30.html
4 81 0.41% 53 2.38% /gpage28.html
5 71 0.36% 45 2.02% /gpage22.html
6 80 0.41% 43 1.93% /gpage25.html
7 72 0.37% 39 1.75% /gpage13.html
8 70 0.35% 39 1.75% /gpage38.html
9 79 0.40% 38 1.71% /gpage16.html
10 65 0.33% 37 1.66% /gpage21.html
11 68 0.34% 33 1.48% /gpage19.html
12 73 0.37% 33 1.48% /gpage34.html
13 59 0.30% 32 1.44% /gpage41.html
14 59 0.30% 31 1.39% /gpage1.html
15 62 0.31% 31 1.39% /gpage24.html
16 62 0.31% 31 1.39% /gpage9.html
17 54 0.27% 29 1.30% /gpage31.html
18 55 0.28% 29 1.30% /gpage36.html
20 61 0.31% 28 1.26% /gpage17.html
21 56 0.28% 28 1.26% /gpage6.html
22 59 0.30% 26 1.17% /gpage8.html
23 53 0.27% 25 1.12% /gpage33.html
24 55 0.28% 24 1.08% /gpage3.html
WEBSITE STATISTICS
26 of 141
28
47 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
5 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
25 54 0.27% 23 1.03% /gpage27.html
26 53 0.27% 23 1.03% /gpage29.html
27 51 0.26% 22 0.99% /gpage10.html
28 49 0.25% 22 0.99% /gpage2.html
29 51 0.26% 22 0.99% /gpage39.html
30 45 0.23% 21 0.94% /gpage14.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 863 4.38% 675 30.21% /default.htm
2 347 1.76% 263 11.77% /index-2.html
3 213 1.08% 148 6.62% /gpage30.html
5 81 0.41% 46 2.06% /gpage28.html
6 80 0.41% 44 1.97% /gpage25.html
7 72 0.37% 41 1.84% /gpage13.html
8 79 0.40% 41 1.84% /gpage16.html
9 70 0.35% 40 1.79% /gpage38.html
10 65 0.33% 39 1.75% /gpage21.html
11 71 0.36% 39 1.75% /gpage22.html
12 73 0.37% 36 1.61% /gpage34.html
13 59 0.30% 33 1.48% /gpage41.html
14 62 0.31% 33 1.48% /gpage9.html
15 59 0.30% 32 1.43% /gpage8.html

1 3441 17.44% 269 7.95% 90044 18.12% 218 9.56% 74.99.172.251
2 612 3.10% 6 0.18% 1659 0.33% 1 0.04% 72.245.147.3
3 430 2.18% 5 0.15% 1568 0.32% 4 0.18% 24.152.250.242
4 332 1.68% 3 0.09% 752 0.15% 1 0.04% 64.9.49.190
5 255 1.29% 3 0.09% 639 0.13% 2 0.09% 173.163.16.250
6 237 1.20% 4 0.12% 1103 0.22% 1 0.04% 166.137.240.84
7 225 1.14% 27 0.80% 13500 2.72% 25 1.10% 50.27.102.202
8 199 1.01% 2 0.06% 919 0.19% 1 0.04% 208.67.143.49
9 198 1.00% 6 0.18% 702 0.14% 1 0.04% 166.137.240.62
10 172 0.87% 3 0.09% 1021 0.21% 1 0.04% 50.152.93.168
11 172 0.87% 3 0.09% 479 0.10% 2 0.09% 73.187.187.253
12 172 0.87% 3 0.09% 1218 0.25% 3 0.13% 8.225.222.3
13 169 0.86% 2 0.06% 667 0.13% 1 0.04% 71.127.148.121
14 168 0.85% 6 0.18% 614 0.12% 1 0.04% 24.211.236.197
15 167 0.85% 3 0.09% 551 0.11% 1 0.04% 166.137.240.27
16 167 0.85% 2 0.06% 1316 0.26% 1 0.04% 86.172.147.131
17 159 0.81% 1 0.03% 338 0.07% 1 0.04% 73.187.81.54
WEBSITE STATISTICS
27 of 141
29
48 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
6 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
18 155 0.79% 64 1.89% 5461 1.10% 44 1.93% 207.46.13.101
19 146 0.74% 123 3.64% 14961 3.01% 1 0.04% 54.157.229.122
20 133 0.67% 64 1.89% 5324 1.07% 38 1.67% 157.55.39.33
21 133 0.67% 1 0.03% 745 0.15% 1 0.04% 45.48.188.163
22 130 0.66% 1 0.03% 382 0.08% 1 0.04% 70.15.116.245
23 124 0.63% 75 2.22% 6630 1.33% 51 2.24% 207.46.13.25
24 122 0.62% 4 0.12% 450 0.09% 1 0.04% 166.216.165.93
25 121 0.61% 2 0.06% 417 0.08% 1 0.04% 152.208.65.127
26 120 0.61% 2 0.06% 583 0.12% 1 0.04% 1.46.234.225
27 118 0.60% 18 0.53% 1552 0.31% 36 1.58% 66.249.79.127
28 116 0.59% 28 0.83% 4202 0.85% 17 0.75% 207.46.13.9
29 116 0.59% 1 0.03% 517 0.10% 1 0.04% 97.89.147.191
30 115 0.58% 1 0.03% 276 0.06% 1 0.04% 209.221.240.193
31 115 0.58% 2 0.06% 358 0.07% 1 0.04% 66.87.68.69
32 114 0.58% 25 0.74% 1664 0.33% 47 2.06% 66.249.79.68
33 113 0.57% 1 0.03% 257 0.05% 1 0.04% 174.201.19.16
34 113 0.57% 41 1.21% 3516 0.71% 32 1.40% 40.77.167.23
35 113 0.57% 2 0.06% 325 0.07% 1 0.04% 73.79.235.32
36 112 0.57% 2 0.06% 383 0.08% 1 0.04% 73.130.110.172
37 111 0.56% 46 1.36% 3886 0.78% 29 1.27% 157.55.39.112
38 111 0.56% 1 0.03% 253 0.05% 1 0.04% 67.60.213.241
39 110 0.56% 47 1.39% 6466 1.30% 25 1.10% 207.46.13.99
40 105 0.53% 1 0.03% 946 0.19% 1 0.04% 205.222.248.13
41 103 0.52% 1 0.03% 239 0.05% 1 0.04% 107.167.108.171
42 95 0.48% 25 0.74% 2470 0.50% 44 1.93% 66.249.79.73
43 94 0.48% 86 2.54% 10254 2.06% 2 0.09% 5.9.98.130
44 93 0.47% 1 0.03% 675 0.14% 1 0.04% 54.172.97.254
45 91 0.46% 30 0.89% 4343 0.87% 2 0.09% 82.211.1.113
46 87 0.44% 1 0.03% 211 0.04% 1 0.04% 108.55.64.81
47 86 0.44% 1 0.03% 210 0.04% 1 0.04% 217.41.64.92
48 76 0.39% 22 0.65% 4056 0.82% 16 0.70% 157.55.39.170
49 75 0.38% 1 0.03% 190 0.04% 1 0.04% 172.56.28.58
50 71 0.36% 27 0.80% 2196 0.44% 19 0.83% 40.77.167.87

1 3441 17.44% 269 7.95% 90044 18.12% 218 9.56% 74.99.172.251
2 146 0.74% 123 3.64% 14961 3.01% 1 0.04% 54.157.229.122
3 225 1.14% 27 0.80% 13500 2.72% 25 1.10% 50.27.102.202
4 94 0.48% 86 2.54% 10254 2.06% 2 0.09% 5.9.98.130
5 68 0.34% 63 1.86% 9015 1.81% 1 0.04% 71.127.222.91
6 124 0.63% 75 2.22% 6630 1.33% 51 2.24% 207.46.13.25
7 110 0.56% 47 1.39% 6466 1.30% 25 1.10% 207.46.13.99
8 52 0.26% 49 1.45% 6245 1.26% 1 0.04% 64.79.100.30
9 70 0.35% 40 1.18% 6229 1.25% 25 1.10% 40.77.167.57
WEBSITE STATISTICS
28 of 141
30
49 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
7 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
10 155 0.79% 64 1.89% 5461 1.10% 44 1.93% 207.46.13.101

# Hits Referrer
2 30 0.15% http://google.com/search
7 5 0.03% http://1-99seo.com/try.php
9 5 0.03% http://ru-dety.ru/
10 4 0.02% http://1-free-share-buttons.com
11 4 0.02% http://kharkov.mistr-x.org/
12 3 0.02% http://astana.xkaz.org/
13 3 0.02% http://freetangodownload.com/tango-for-pc/
14 3 0.02% http://gribkovye-zabolevaniya.com/
15 3 0.02% http://komputers-best.ru/
16 3 0.02% http://kursy-ege.ru/
17 3 0.02% http://life-instyle.com/
18 3 0.02% http://light.ifmo.ru/
19 3 0.02% http://limtu.ifmo.ru/
20 3 0.02% http://manuscript.su/
21 3 0.02% http://medicines-choice.com/
22 3 0.02% http://petrovka-online.com/
23 3 0.02% http://phototravel.pl/
24 3 0.02% http://pk-services.ru/
25 3 0.02% http://pokerniydom.ru/
26 3 0.02% http://purchasepillsnorx.com/
27 3 0.02% http://shmetall.com.ua/
28 3 0.02% http://storehouse.ua/
29 3 0.02% http://vavilone.com/
30 3 0.02% http://voloomoney.com/buy/kupit-gold-wow/
31 3 0.02% http://whatsappdownload10.com/whatsapp-on-ipad/
33 3 0.02% http://xn----7sbbagbq7bd5aheftfllo4m.xn--p1ai/
34 3 0.02% http://xn--80aaomkdl5amcy.xn--p1ai/
35 3 0.02% http://xn--d1abj0abs9d.in.ua/
37 2 0.01% (null)
38 2 0.01% http://3-letter-domains.net/try.php
39 2 0.01% http://almata.xkaz.org/
40 2 0.01% http://confib.ifmo.ru/
41 2 0.01% http://crazyboost.pro/
WEBSITE STATISTICS
29 of 141
31
50 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
8 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
42 2 0.01% http://doxyporno.com/
43 2 0.01% http://heatpower.ru/
44 2 0.01% http://indiakino.net/
45 2 0.01% http://l.facebook.com/lsr.php
47 2 0.01% http://pharmacyincity.com/
48 2 0.01% http://turizm.bz/
49 2 0.01% http://ukrup.com/
50 2 0.01% http://uytmaster.ru/top/santech

1 30 96.77% anonymous
2 1 3.23% tommy caterbone

# Hits User Agent
1 9930 50.34% Safari (OSX)
7 179 0.91% Firefox 3
13 58 0.29% Opera
18 18 0.09% Twitterbot/1.0
19 13 0.07% Firefox 2
20 10 0.05% Spider: Archive.org
21 8 0.04% Go-http-client/1.1
24 5 0.03% python-requests/2.11.1
25 4 0.02% Programming: curl library (PHP)
26 4 0.02% SalesIntelligent (+https://www.salesintelligent.com)
27 4 0.02% Spider: larbin (http://sourceforge.net/projects/larbin/)
WEBSITE STATISTICS
30 of 141
32
51 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
9 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
28 3 0.02% Agent

1 16717 84.75% 2346 69.37% 373456 75.16% United States

2 522 2.65% 46 1.36% 9044 1.82% Great Britain (UK)
3 431 2.19% 356 10.53% 35257 7.10% China
4 364 1.85% 215 6.36% 28261 5.69% Germany
5 300 1.52% 11 0.33% 1613 0.32% Brazil
6 240 1.22% 15 0.44% 1476 0.30% Czech Republic
7 149 0.76% 122 3.61% 15885 3.20% France
8 130 0.66% 129 3.81% 8798 1.77% Ukraine
9 121 0.61% 3 0.09% 1096 0.22% Thailand
10 112 0.57% 2 0.06% 314 0.06% Spain
11 103 0.52% 1 0.03% 239 0.05% Asia/Pacific Region
13 81 0.41% 10 0.30% 703 0.14% Netherlands
14 61 0.31% 1 0.03% 181 0.04% Finland
15 58 0.29% 1 0.03% 613 0.12% Philippines
16 57 0.29% 2 0.06% 218 0.04% Malaysia
17 57 0.29% 1 0.03% 159 0.03% Viet Nam
18 35 0.18% 24 0.71% 3715 0.75% Canada
19 13 0.07% 3 0.09% 652 0.13% India
21 7 0.04% 1 0.03% 71 0.01% Australia
22 7 0.04% 2 0.06% 130 0.03% Ireland
23 7 0.04% 3 0.09% 187 0.04% Taiwan
24 5 0.03% 2 0.06% 127 0.03% Pakistan
WEBSITE STATISTICS
31 of 141
33
52 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
10 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
25 5 0.03% 4 0.12% 1056 0.21% Romania
26 3 0.02% 2 0.06% 182 0.04% Greece
27 3 0.02% 2 0.06% 576 0.12% Indonesia
28 3 0.02% 2 0.06% 576 0.12% Italy
29 3 0.02% 3 0.09% 1540 0.31% Latvia
30 3 0.02% 3 0.09% 241 0.05% Anonymous Proxy
WEBSITE STATISTICS
32 of 141
34
53 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
11 of 11 11/30/2016 7:29 AM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - Summary... http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015

Summary by Month
Generated 30-Nov-2016 11:27 GMT
Summary by Month
Daily Avg Monthly Totals
Month
Hits Files Pages Visits Sites KBytes Visits Pages Files Hits
Nov 2016 680 116 132 78 1034 496856 2280 3840 3382 19725
Oct 2016 599 108 114 68 1030 455417 2114 3543 3365 18588
Sep 2016 559 122 131 67 1072 435530 2019 3933 3669 16780
Aug 2016 870 131 142 67 1091 504017 2090 4406 4067 26977
Jul 2016 694 126 141 68 1163 514193 2133 4377 3926 21516
Jun 2016 771 111 118 65 1148 445134 1967 3568 3349 23141
May 2016 891 115 128 68 1230 476902 2125 3978 3587 27639
Apr 2016 1407 117 514 64 1395 493708 1939 15446 3529 42228
Mar 2016 865 108 116 64 1236 427679 1998 3612 3375 26821
Feb 2016 707 104 119 68 1232 375237 2000 3461 3034 20504
Jan 2016 618 107 116 61 1178 394540 1897 3596 3325 19186
2016 5019213 22562 53760 38608 263105
2015
Dec 2015 617 95 105 56 1011 382131 1766 3262 2975 19132
Nov 2015 328 71 84 47 906 257996 1414 2538 2158 9868
Oct 2015 312 48 55 41 424 70549 539 716 626 4060
2015 710676 3719 6516 5759 33060
Totals 5729889 26281 60276 44367 296165
WEBSITE STATISTICS
33 of 141
35
54 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
1 of 1 11/30/2016 7:31 AM
Invoice - Omnis Network - Account Manager https://secured.omnis.com/manage/invoice
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
MEDIA
since
GROUP
2015
WEBSITE STATISTICS
34 of 141
36
55 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 10,
12, 2017
1 of 1 11/30/2016 7:26 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by OMNIS
Omnis MEDIA
since
GROUP
Network, 2015
LLC
1005 W Geneva Dr
Tempe, AZ 85282
(310) 316-9600
billing@omnis.com
Stan Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
United States
7178265354
8885333606
scaterbone@live.com
Invoice: 5HZ-20161130
Date: Nov 30th, 2016
Due: Upon Receipt
Past Due: Dec 10th, 2016
Description Amount
amggl002 web site hosting (Nov 30th, 2016 to Feb 28th, 2017)
Web Site Hosting (Windows Web Hosting) $32.85
SubTotal: $32.85
Total: $32.85
Payment can be made using credit card or PayPal at any time using the Payments tool in the Account Manager at https://secured.omnis.com/manage.
To make a payment by check or money order, send the payment to our mailing address noting the invoice number on the payment.
WEBSITE STATISTICS
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP WEBSTATS Page 35 of 141
37
56
68
Page 1/1 108
110
129 Tuesday
SundayJanuary
March 12,
10, 2017
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - October 2016 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201610.html
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: October 2016
Generated 22-Oct-2016 04:30 GMT
Monthly Statistics for October 2016

Total Hits 11151
Total Files 2182
Total Pages 2306
Total Visits 1356
Total KBytes 295816
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 32 65
Code 200 - OK 19.57% 2182
Code 404 - Not Found 80.09% 8931
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page69
36
38
57
1 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
1 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for October 2016

1 618 5.54% 94 4.31% 102 4.42% 62 4.57% 57 8.48% 10650 3.60%
2 341 3.06% 103 4.72% 114 4.94% 59 4.35% 57 8.48% 10929 3.69%
3 715 6.41% 92 4.22% 101 4.38% 70 5.16% 52 7.74% 19146 6.47%
4 632 5.67% 161 7.38% 167 7.24% 85 6.27% 61 9.08% 20065 6.78%
5 496 4.45% 112 5.13% 117 5.07% 68 5.01% 49 7.29% 15908 5.38%
6 691 6.20% 124 5.68% 145 6.29% 81 5.97% 60 8.93% 14343 4.85%
7 595 5.34% 96 4.40% 102 4.42% 75 5.53% 65 9.67% 15021 5.08%
8 697 6.25% 87 3.99% 88 3.82% 59 4.35% 45 6.70% 14380 4.86%
9 385 3.45% 115 5.27% 120 5.20% 49 3.61% 43 6.40% 14389 4.86%
10 595 5.34% 132 6.05% 138 5.98% 66 4.87% 53 7.89% 17819 6.02%
11 472 4.23% 88 4.03% 90 3.90% 53 3.91% 48 7.14% 10663 3.60%
12 434 3.89% 97 4.45% 104 4.51% 68 5.01% 55 8.18% 11638 3.93%
13 362 3.25% 89 4.08% 92 3.99% 58 4.28% 62 9.23% 11593 3.92%
14 422 3.78% 147 6.74% 152 6.59% 52 3.83% 49 7.29% 21226 7.18%
15 407 3.65% 96 4.40% 108 4.68% 54 3.98% 47 6.99% 11804 3.99%
16 367 3.29% 78 3.57% 82 3.56% 60 4.42% 45 6.70% 11206 3.79%
17 392 3.52% 90 4.12% 92 3.99% 61 4.50% 46 6.85% 10454 3.53%
18 613 5.50% 97 4.45% 99 4.29% 69 5.09% 62 9.23% 14572 4.93%
19 806 7.23% 79 3.62% 81 3.51% 61 4.50% 47 6.99% 12446 4.21%
20 654 5.86% 107 4.90% 108 4.68% 79 5.83% 49 7.29% 14311 4.84%
21 457 4.10% 98 4.49% 104 4.51% 68 5.01% 58 8.63% 13252 4.48%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page70
37
39
58
2 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
2 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Hourly Statistics for October 2016

Hour
0 25 537 4.82% 3 65 2.98% 3 78 3.38% 457 9593 3.24%
1 22 472 4.23% 3 75 3.44% 4 87 3.77% 515 10810 3.65%
2 23 489 4.39% 3 76 3.48% 3 79 3.43% 518 10876 3.68%
3 7 157 1.41% 2 52 2.38% 2 60 2.60% 295 6187 2.09%
4 12 268 2.40% 2 51 2.34% 2 58 2.52% 336 7053 2.38%
5 16 342 3.07% 3 67 3.07% 3 68 2.95% 354 7427 2.51%
6 10 223 2.00% 5 124 5.68% 6 129 5.59% 662 13900 4.70%
7 17 357 3.20% 3 75 3.44% 3 78 3.38% 453 9505 3.21%
8 11 237 2.13% 3 73 3.35% 3 78 3.38% 467 9815 3.32%
9 29 616 5.52% 3 74 3.39% 3 78 3.38% 579 12154 4.11%
10 14 306 2.74% 3 65 2.98% 3 68 2.95% 399 8379 2.83%
11 21 456 4.09% 3 77 3.53% 3 78 3.38% 594 12472 4.22%
12 24 505 4.53% 9 195 8.94% 9 198 8.59% 1052 22096 7.47%
13 27 582 5.22% 5 118 5.41% 5 122 5.29% 775 16270 5.50%
14 28 608 5.45% 3 76 3.48% 3 82 3.56% 581 12191 4.12%
15 42 897 8.04% 6 134 6.14% 6 136 5.90% 918 19272 6.51%
16 27 581 5.21% 3 82 3.76% 4 84 3.64% 479 10061 3.40%
17 27 586 5.26% 4 84 3.85% 4 86 3.73% 607 12746 4.31%
18 31 671 6.02% 3 83 3.80% 4 86 3.73% 564 11847 4.00%
19 29 616 5.52% 7 148 6.78% 7 154 6.68% 1036 21754 7.35%
20 24 517 4.64% 5 123 5.64% 6 135 5.85% 806 16920 5.72%
21 20 424 3.80% 4 89 4.08% 4 91 3.95% 552 11600 3.92%
22 21 445 3.99% 4 101 4.63% 5 110 4.77% 613 12867 4.35%
23 12 259 2.32% 3 75 3.44% 3 83 3.60% 477 10021 3.39%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1018 9.13% 60830 20.56% /default.htm
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page71
38
40
59
3 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
3 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
2 217 1.95% 66124 22.35% /index-2.html
3 120 1.08% 51764 17.50% /gpage30.html
4 43 0.39% 6179 2.09% /gpage19.html
5 37 0.33% 21281 7.19% /gpage22.html
6 34 0.30% 3960 1.34% /gpage28.html
7 31 0.28% 2360 0.80% /gpage13.html
8 31 0.28% 2272 0.77% /gpage38.html
9 29 0.26% 1546 0.52% /gpage29.html
10 28 0.25% 6896 2.33% /gpage17.html
11 28 0.25% 3620 1.22% /gpage8.html
12 27 0.24% 1592 0.54% /gpage3.html
13 27 0.24% 3556 1.20% /gpage33.html
15 26 0.23% 6007 2.03% /gpage16.html
16 24 0.22% 1586 0.54% /gpage1.html
17 24 0.22% 1174 0.40% /gpage11.html
18 24 0.22% 3640 1.23% /gpage41.html
19 22 0.20% 2307 0.78% /gpage24.html
20 22 0.20% 978 0.33% /gpage25.html
21 22 0.20% 2258 0.76% /gpage27.html
22 21 0.19% 1136 0.38% /gpage31.html
23 20 0.18% 2232 0.75% /gpage18.html
24 20 0.18% 1660 0.56% /gpage2.html
25 20 0.18% 2756 0.93% /gpage20.html
26 19 0.17% 2903 0.98% /gpage9.html
27 18 0.16% 733 0.25% /gpage12.html
28 18 0.16% 975 0.33% /gpage34.html
29 18 0.16% 1770 0.60% /gpage5.html
30 17 0.15% 757 0.26% /gpage36.html
31 16 0.14% 1694 0.57% /gpage21.html
32 16 0.14% 657 0.22% /gpage7.html
33 15 0.13% 4728 1.60% /
34 15 0.13% 940 0.32% /gpage23.html
35 15 0.13% 743 0.25% /gpage32.html
36 15 0.13% 651 0.22% /gpage4.html
37 14 0.13% 520 0.18% /gpage40.html
38 14 0.13% 583 0.20% /gpage6.html
39 13 0.12% 1693 0.57% /gpage10.html
40 13 0.12% 483 0.16% /gpage14.html
41 13 0.12% 491 0.17% /gpage15.html
42 10 0.09% 938 0.32% /gpage26.html
43 9 0.08% 570 0.19% /gpage37.html
44 7 0.06% 339 0.11% /gpage39.html

# Hits KBytes URL
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page72
39
41
60
4 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
4 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
1 217 1.95% 66124 22.35% /index-2.html

2 1018 9.13% 60830 20.56% /default.htm
3 120 1.08% 51764 17.50% /gpage30.html
4 37 0.33% 21281 7.19% /gpage22.html
5 28 0.25% 6896 2.33% /gpage17.html
6 43 0.39% 6179 2.09% /gpage19.html
7 26 0.23% 6007 2.03% /gpage16.html
8 15 0.13% 4728 1.60% /
9 34 0.30% 3960 1.34% /gpage28.html
10 24 0.22% 3640 1.23% /gpage41.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1018 9.13% 591 44.81% /default.htm
2 217 1.95% 175 13.27% /index-2.html
3 120 1.08% 106 8.04% /gpage30.html
4 34 0.30% 26 1.97% /gpage28.html
5 37 0.33% 25 1.90% /gpage22.html
6 43 0.39% 21 1.59% /gpage19.html
7 31 0.28% 21 1.59% /gpage38.html
8 28 0.25% 20 1.52% /gpage8.html
9 28 0.25% 19 1.44% /gpage17.html
10 31 0.28% 18 1.36% /gpage13.html
11 26 0.23% 17 1.29% /gpage16.html
12 29 0.26% 17 1.29% /gpage29.html
13 27 0.24% 15 1.14% /gpage3.html
14 21 0.19% 14 1.06% /gpage31.html
15 27 0.24% 14 1.06% /gpage33.html
16 24 0.22% 13 0.99% /gpage1.html
17 15 0.13% 12 0.91% /
18 22 0.20% 12 0.91% /gpage24.html
19 24 0.22% 12 0.91% /gpage41.html
20 22 0.20% 11 0.83% /gpage25.html
21 18 0.16% 10 0.76% /gpage12.html
22 20 0.18% 10 0.76% /gpage18.html
23 16 0.14% 10 0.76% /gpage21.html
24 22 0.20% 10 0.76% /gpage27.html
25 17 0.15% 10 0.76% /gpage36.html
26 18 0.16% 10 0.76% /gpage5.html
27 20 0.18% 9 0.68% /gpage2.html
28 19 0.17% 9 0.68% /gpage9.html
30 24 0.22% 8 0.61% /gpage11.html

Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page73
40
42
61
5 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
5 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
# Hits Visits URL

1 1018 9.13% 581 43.92% /default.htm
2 217 1.95% 176 13.30% /index-2.html
3 120 1.08% 100 7.56% /gpage30.html
4 43 0.39% 23 1.74% /gpage19.html
5 34 0.30% 23 1.74% /gpage28.html
6 31 0.28% 23 1.74% /gpage38.html
7 31 0.28% 22 1.66% /gpage13.html
8 37 0.33% 22 1.66% /gpage22.html
9 28 0.25% 20 1.51% /gpage17.html
10 28 0.25% 19 1.44% /gpage8.html
12 27 0.24% 16 1.21% /gpage3.html
13 29 0.26% 15 1.13% /gpage29.html
14 21 0.19% 15 1.13% /gpage31.html
15 24 0.22% 14 1.06% /gpage11.html

1 2277 20.42% 177 8.11% 58848 19.89% 154 11.36% 74.99.172.251
2 308 2.76% 5 0.23% 856 0.29% 2 0.15% 50.200.249.194
3 283 2.54% 3 0.14% 2031 0.69% 3 0.22% 86.164.231.187
4 260 2.33% 8 0.37% 1515 0.51% 1 0.07% 173.152.5.107
5 215 1.93% 5 0.23% 796 0.27% 1 0.07% 50.73.19.33
6 174 1.56% 4 0.18% 506 0.17% 1 0.07% 96.253.205.245
7 136 1.22% 5 0.23% 458 0.15% 1 0.07% 168.133.2.42
8 120 1.08% 2 0.09% 566 0.19% 1 0.07% 174.49.131.187
9 116 1.04% 2 0.09% 321 0.11% 2 0.15% 24.229.66.222
10 115 1.03% 1 0.05% 713 0.24% 1 0.07% 142.255.213.242
11 113 1.01% 2 0.09% 1221 0.41% 2 0.15% 174.100.114.32
12 113 1.01% 1 0.05% 257 0.09% 1 0.07% 73.64.169.114
13 111 1.00% 111 5.09% 6735 2.28% 36 2.65% 178.137.167.230
14 109 0.98% 1 0.05% 505 0.17% 1 0.07% 23.30.213.26
15 109 0.98% 22 1.01% 3706 1.25% 12 0.88% 40.77.167.21
16 109 0.98% 1 0.05% 266 0.09% 1 0.07% 62.232.58.4
17 90 0.81% 1 0.05% 217 0.07% 1 0.07% 73.79.235.115
18 76 0.68% 63 2.89% 9029 3.05% 1 0.07% 72.76.221.220
19 75 0.67% 75 3.44% 4551 1.54% 20 1.47% 37.115.187.108
20 74 0.66% 2 0.09% 637 0.22% 1 0.07% 217.96.244.189
21 73 0.65% 73 3.35% 4429 1.50% 17 1.25% 46.118.118.216
22 71 0.64% 27 1.24% 2402 0.81% 15 1.11% 157.55.39.212
23 71 0.64% 71 3.25% 4308 1.46% 24 1.77% 46.118.155.22
24 68 0.61% 1 0.05% 881 0.30% 1 0.07% 68.80.47.19
25 67 0.60% 1 0.05% 629 0.21% 1 0.07% 47.203.17.140
26 66 0.59% 1 0.05% 249 0.08% 1 0.07% 66.216.166.126
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page74
41
43
62
6 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
6 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
27 63 0.56% 1 0.05% 424 0.14% 1 0.07% 174.59.39.219
28 63 0.56% 2 0.09% 620 0.21% 1 0.07% 50.81.190.206
29 62 0.56% 1 0.05% 620 0.21% 1 0.07% 212.219.153.127
30 62 0.56% 2 0.09% 255 0.09% 1 0.07% 51.175.65.143
31 62 0.56% 1 0.05% 168 0.06% 1 0.07% 95.246.127.210
32 61 0.55% 2 0.09% 419 0.14% 1 0.07% 100.2.208.150
33 61 0.55% 17 0.78% 1157 0.39% 15 1.11% 207.46.13.149
34 60 0.54% 2 0.09% 317 0.11% 1 0.07% 174.54.205.137
35 60 0.54% 1 0.05% 247 0.08% 1 0.07% 174.54.225.70
36 60 0.54% 23 1.05% 4508 1.52% 8 0.59% 207.46.13.107
37 60 0.54% 1 0.05% 419 0.14% 1 0.07% 73.79.232.197
38 59 0.53% 1 0.05% 615 0.21% 1 0.07% 129.170.194.166
39 59 0.53% 1 0.05% 245 0.08% 1 0.07% 174.54.65.139
40 59 0.53% 1 0.05% 178 0.06% 1 0.07% 217.39.80.85
41 59 0.53% 1 0.05% 208 0.07% 1 0.07% 50.142.183.247
42 59 0.53% 1 0.05% 615 0.21% 1 0.07% 64.22.249.253
43 59 0.53% 1 0.05% 417 0.14% 1 0.07% 76.116.248.141
44 58 0.52% 2 0.09% 200 0.07% 1 0.07% 148.251.190.210
45 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 613 0.21% 1 0.07% 172.56.15.107
46 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 613 0.21% 1 0.07% 173.10.19.49
47 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 355 0.12% 1 0.07% 174.200.7.148
48 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 864 0.29% 1 0.07% 195.22.26.187
49 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 235 0.08% 1 0.07% 206.29.176.76
50 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 415 0.14% 1 0.07% 208.54.90.221

1 2277 20.42% 177 8.11% 58848 19.89% 154 11.36% 74.99.172.251
2 76 0.68% 63 2.89% 9029 3.05% 1 0.07% 72.76.221.220
3 111 1.00% 111 5.09% 6735 2.28% 36 2.65% 178.137.167.230
4 23 0.21% 23 1.05% 5681 1.92% 22 1.62% 195.154.250.39
5 47 0.42% 43 1.97% 4843 1.64% 1 0.07% 5.9.98.130
6 75 0.67% 75 3.44% 4551 1.54% 20 1.47% 37.115.187.108
7 60 0.54% 23 1.05% 4508 1.52% 8 0.59% 207.46.13.107
8 73 0.65% 73 3.35% 4429 1.50% 17 1.25% 46.118.118.216
9 71 0.64% 71 3.25% 4308 1.46% 24 1.77% 46.118.155.22
10 55 0.49% 21 0.96% 4278 1.45% 12 0.88% 207.46.13.81

# Hits Referrer
2 15 0.13% http://purchasepillsnorx.com/
3 15 0.13% http://sarf3omlat.com/
4 12 0.11% https://www.provisov.net/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page75
42
44
63
7 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
7 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
5 11 0.10% http://www.mosrif.ru/
6 10 0.09% http://dengi-pod-zalog-nedvizhimosti.ru/
8 9 0.08% http://filmgo.ru/
9 9 0.08% http://indiakino.net/
10 9 0.08% http://kol-energo.ru/
11 9 0.08% http://lvov.mistr-x.org/
12 9 0.08% http://meduza-consult.ru/
13 9 0.08% http://odessa.mistr-x.org/
14 9 0.08% http://ultramart.biz/
15 9 0.08% http://voloomoney.com/buy/kupit-gold-wow/
16 9 0.08% http://www.seeingmeerkat.com/
17 8 0.07% http://cheap-pills-norx.com/
18 8 0.07% http://pharmacyincity.com/
19 8 0.07% http://taxi-v-eisk.ru/
21 7 0.06% http://my-big-family.com/
22 7 0.06% http://souvenir.cc/
23 6 0.05% http://aktivator-windows10.blogspot.com/
24 6 0.05% http://alloysteel.ru/
25 6 0.05% http://astana.xkaz.org/
26 6 0.05% http://avtolombard-krasnodar.ru/
27 6 0.05% http://doxyporno.com/
28 6 0.05% http://expresstoplivo.ru/
29 6 0.05% http://gotomontenegro.net/
30 6 0.05% http://heatpower.ru/
31 6 0.05% http://ibb.com.ua/
32 6 0.05% http://kazinogames.lv/
33 6 0.05% http://kinogonew.ru/
34 6 0.05% http://kosynka-games.ru/
35 6 0.05% http://life-instyle.com/
36 6 0.05% http://meds-online24.com/
37 6 0.05% http://nalogovyy-kodeks.ru/
38 6 0.05% http://pokemongo-all-news.ru/
39 6 0.05% http://profitsport.club/
40 6 0.05% http://rukino.org/
41 6 0.05% http://vadimkravtcov.ru/
42 6 0.05% http://www.c-english.ru/
43 6 0.05% http://www.itservicesthatworkforyou.com/
44 6 0.05% http://x-lime.net/
45 6 0.05% http://x-porno.video/
46 6 0.05% https://www.brus.city/
47 5 0.04% http://almata.xkaz.org/
48 5 0.04% http://arenanews.com.ua/zdorove/4701-kosmetologicheskiy-salon-eteriya-na-rishelevskoy-30.html
49 5 0.04% http://idc.com.ua/
50 5 0.04% http://video-chat.cn/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page76
43
45
64
8 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
8 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

# Hits User Agent
1 5103 45.76% Safari (OSX)
7 107 0.96% Opera
9 71 0.64% Netscape
13 25 0.22% Firefox 3
14 24 0.22% Internet Explorer
18 11 0.10% Firefox 2
20 8 0.07% Device: I-mode Compatible Mobile Phone
24 5 0.04% Program: Powermarks (Bookmark Manager)
25 5 0.04% Spider: WebCapture.biz
27 3 0.03% Mediatoolkitbot (complaints@mediatoolkit.com)
28 3 0.03% Wotbox/2.01 (+http://www.wotbox.com/bot/)
29 2 0.02% Agent
30 2 0.02% Internet Explorer (Mac)
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page77
44
46
65
9 of 141
73
108
110
129 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
9 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

1 7964 71.42% 1025 46.98% 175413 59.30% United States
2 766 6.87% 69 3.16% 11134 3.76% Great Britain (UK)
3 529 4.74% 526 24.11% 32373 10.94% Ukraine
4 400 3.59% 10 0.46% 1290 0.44% Brazil
5 230 2.06% 180 8.25% 17323 5.86% China
6 168 1.51% 90 4.12% 12098 4.09% Germany
7 120 1.08% 6 0.27% 595 0.20% Czech Republic
8 115 1.03% 1 0.05% 713 0.24% Puerto Rico
9 103 0.92% 100 4.58% 11220 3.79% Dominica
10 81 0.73% 11 0.50% 1125 0.38% Italy
11 81 0.73% 3 0.14% 791 0.27% Poland
12 70 0.63% 4 0.18% 1065 0.36% Canada
13 69 0.62% 52 2.38% 12278 4.15% France
14 61 0.55% 3 0.14% 284 0.10% Philippines
15 58 0.52% 1 0.05% 864 0.29% Portugal
16 57 0.51% 1 0.05% 611 0.21% Austria
17 57 0.51% 1 0.05% 159 0.05% Sweden
18 56 0.50% 0 0.00% 98 0.03% Bolivia
21 14 0.13% 14 0.64% 1755 0.59% Japan
22 10 0.09% 5 0.23% 960 0.32% Netherlands
24 7 0.06% 3 0.14% 256 0.09% Singapore
25 6 0.05% 1 0.05% 69 0.02% Australia
26 6 0.05% 3 0.14% 640 0.22% India
27 4 0.04% 4 0.18% 1601 0.54% Viet Nam
28 3 0.03% 2 0.09% 123 0.04% Croatia
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page78
45
47
66
10of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
10 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
29 3 0.03% 3 0.14% 1288 0.44% Thailand
30 2 0.02% 2 0.09% 524 0.18% Israel
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page79
46
48
67
11of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
11 of 11 10/22/2016 5:36 AM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - Septembe... http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201609.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: September 2016
Generated 01-Oct-2016 04:26 GMT
Monthly Statistics for September 2016

Total Hits 16780
Total Files 3669
Total Pages 3933
Total Visits 2019
Total KBytes 435530
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 35 98
Code 200 - OK 21.87% 3669
Code 404 - Not Found 77.30% 12971
Code 405 - Method Not Allowed 0.01% 2
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page80
47
49
68
12of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
1 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for September 2016

1 556 3.31% 155 4.22% 160 4.07% 74 3.67% 75 7.00% 20099 4.61%
2 510 3.04% 111 3.03% 112 2.85% 68 3.37% 55 5.13% 10892 2.50%
3 514 3.06% 69 1.88% 72 1.83% 52 2.58% 58 5.41% 8647 1.99%
4 716 4.27% 98 2.67% 114 2.90% 71 3.52% 75 7.00% 11381 2.61%
5 726 4.33% 135 3.68% 147 3.74% 63 3.12% 57 5.32% 15893 3.65%
6 748 4.46% 148 4.03% 153 3.89% 59 2.92% 73 6.81% 15575 3.58%
7 549 3.27% 107 2.92% 113 2.87% 82 4.06% 98 9.14% 18913 4.34%
8 678 4.04% 116 3.16% 127 3.23% 76 3.76% 84 7.84% 11149 2.56%
9 361 2.15% 112 3.05% 132 3.36% 82 4.06% 71 6.62% 11893 2.73%
10 286 1.70% 86 2.34% 98 2.49% 65 3.22% 59 5.50% 9610 2.21%
11 901 5.37% 192 5.23% 203 5.16% 72 3.57% 70 6.53% 21352 4.90%
12 576 3.43% 138 3.76% 153 3.89% 91 4.51% 70 6.53% 17387 3.99%
13 362 2.16% 81 2.21% 83 2.11% 51 2.53% 51 4.76% 7954 1.83%
14 490 2.92% 150 4.09% 159 4.04% 74 3.67% 68 6.34% 14100 3.24%
15 661 3.94% 105 2.86% 107 2.72% 65 3.22% 59 5.50% 12041 2.76%
16 508 3.03% 172 4.69% 180 4.58% 69 3.42% 64 5.97% 20108 4.62%
17 238 1.42% 86 2.34% 91 2.31% 63 3.12% 60 5.60% 8715 2.00%
18 168 1.00% 73 1.99% 81 2.06% 57 2.82% 55 5.13% 7854 1.80%
19 633 3.77% 166 4.52% 172 4.37% 57 2.82% 48 4.48% 16800 3.86%
20 511 3.05% 95 2.59% 100 2.54% 42 2.08% 46 4.29% 12074 2.77%
21 772 4.60% 117 3.19% 129 3.28% 65 3.22% 64 5.97% 10486 2.41%
22 687 4.09% 123 3.35% 139 3.53% 67 3.32% 61 5.69% 17954 4.12%
23 704 4.20% 157 4.28% 162 4.12% 66 3.27% 59 5.50% 17600 4.04%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page81
48
50
69
13of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
2 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
24 585 3.49% 108 2.94% 116 2.95% 59 2.92% 64 5.97% 14564 3.34%
25 223 1.33% 81 2.21% 85 2.16% 55 2.72% 64 5.97% 9534 2.19%
26 599 3.57% 216 5.89% 225 5.72% 78 3.86% 67 6.25% 25988 5.97%
27 839 5.00% 87 2.37% 109 2.77% 68 3.37% 60 5.60% 19234 4.42%
28 273 1.63% 123 3.35% 132 3.36% 61 3.02% 53 4.94% 15515 3.56%
29 828 4.93% 90 2.45% 102 2.59% 75 3.71% 65 6.06% 13435 3.08%
30 578 3.44% 172 4.69% 177 4.50% 93 4.61% 75 7.00% 18784 4.31%
Hourly Statistics for September 2016

Hour
0 25 772 4.60% 5 159 4.33% 5 167 4.25% 661 19816 4.55%
1 33 1013 6.04% 6 180 4.91% 6 187 4.75% 817 24496 5.62%
2 22 684 4.08% 5 167 4.55% 5 173 4.40% 585 17545 4.03%
3 23 703 4.19% 5 155 4.22% 5 168 4.27% 631 18924 4.35%
4 15 473 2.82% 4 130 3.54% 4 142 3.61% 454 13615 3.13%
5 9 277 1.65% 5 156 4.25% 5 172 4.37% 519 15582 3.58%
6 20 603 3.59% 5 165 4.50% 6 205 5.21% 562 16855 3.87%
7 19 586 3.49% 5 161 4.39% 5 174 4.42% 625 18756 4.31%
8 10 303 1.81% 3 112 3.05% 3 118 3.00% 504 15122 3.47%
9 28 855 5.10% 6 183 4.99% 6 195 4.96% 733 22003 5.05%
10 18 567 3.38% 3 91 2.48% 3 96 2.44% 319 9559 2.19%
11 25 776 4.62% 5 151 4.12% 5 154 3.92% 585 17547 4.03%
12 39 1190 7.09% 6 195 5.31% 6 203 5.16% 618 18537 4.26%
13 26 790 4.71% 6 194 5.29% 6 204 5.19% 834 25033 5.75%
14 12 383 2.28% 2 89 2.43% 3 98 2.49% 411 12345 2.83%
15 20 622 3.71% 4 122 3.33% 4 130 3.31% 497 14907 3.42%
16 22 670 3.99% 4 135 3.68% 5 153 3.89% 484 14523 3.33%
17 26 802 4.78% 6 181 4.93% 6 192 4.88% 766 22976 5.28%
18 13 390 2.32% 4 134 3.65% 5 156 3.97% 457 13706 3.15%
19 32 983 5.86% 7 230 6.27% 8 240 6.10% 1042 31257 7.18%
20 35 1062 6.33% 5 170 4.63% 5 175 4.45% 634 19008 4.36%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page82
49
51
70
14of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
3 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
21 20 628 3.74% 3 111 3.03% 4 120 3.05% 518 15550 3.57%
22 25 772 4.60% 3 108 2.94% 3 115 2.92% 460 13786 3.17%
23 29 876 5.22% 6 190 5.18% 6 196 4.98% 803 24085 5.53%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1776 10.58% 105169 24.15% /default.htm
2 187 1.11% 75918 17.43% /gpage30.html
3 147 0.88% 45966 10.55% /index-2.html
4 69 0.41% 7920 1.82% /gpage28.html
5 67 0.40% 38726 8.89% /gpage22.html
6 60 0.36% 5248 1.21% /gpage18.html
7 58 0.35% 5065 1.16% /gpage26.html
8 57 0.34% 2327 0.53% /gpage12.html
9 57 0.34% 5934 1.36% /gpage24.html
10 54 0.32% 12559 2.88% /gpage16.html
11 52 0.31% 2816 0.65% /gpage29.html
12 48 0.29% 3559 0.82% /gpage38.html
13 47 0.28% 10966 2.52% /gpage17.html
14 46 0.27% 3277 0.75% /gpage13.html
15 46 0.27% 6626 1.52% /gpage9.html
16 44 0.26% 2573 0.59% /gpage3.html
17 43 0.26% 1984 0.46% /gpage39.html
18 42 0.25% 5605 1.29% /gpage19.html
19 41 0.24% 5116 1.17% /gpage20.html
20 40 0.24% 4971 1.14% /gpage33.html
21 40 0.24% 5042 1.16% /gpage8.html
23 39 0.23% 3917 0.90% /gpage21.html
24 39 0.23% 2418 0.56% /gpage23.html
25 39 0.23% 2101 0.48% /gpage31.html
26 38 0.23% 1577 0.36% /gpage7.html
27 37 0.22% 4559 1.05% /gpage10.html
28 37 0.22% 1788 0.41% /gpage34.html
29 36 0.21% 2823 0.65% /gpage2.html
30 36 0.21% 1225 0.28% /gpage40.html
31 35 0.21% 1309 0.30% /gpage15.html
32 35 0.21% 1585 0.36% /gpage32.html
33 35 0.21% 4773 1.10% /gpage41.html
34 34 0.20% 3548 0.81% /gpage27.html
35 33 0.20% 1901 0.44% /gpage37.html
36 32 0.19% 10215 2.35% /
37 32 0.19% 1351 0.31% /gpage25.html
38 30 0.18% 1087 0.25% /gpage14.html
39 29 0.17% 1862 0.43% /gpage1.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page83
50
52
71
15of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
4 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
40 29 0.17% 1292 0.30% /gpage36.html
41 29 0.17% 1173 0.27% /gpage4.html
42 28 0.17% 1262 0.29% /gpage6.html
43 24 0.14% 1028 0.24% /gpage11.html
44 23 0.14% 2291 0.53% /gpage5.html

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1776 10.58% 105169 24.15% /default.htm
2 187 1.11% 75918 17.43% /gpage30.html
3 147 0.88% 45966 10.55% /index-2.html
4 67 0.40% 38726 8.89% /gpage22.html
5 54 0.32% 12559 2.88% /gpage16.html
6 47 0.28% 10966 2.52% /gpage17.html
7 32 0.19% 10215 2.35% /
8 69 0.41% 7920 1.82% /gpage28.html
9 46 0.27% 6626 1.52% /gpage9.html
10 57 0.34% 5934 1.36% /gpage24.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1776 10.58% 1014 52.03% /default.htm
2 187 1.11% 157 8.06% /gpage30.html
3 147 0.88% 109 5.59% /index-2.html
4 69 0.41% 47 2.41% /gpage28.html
5 67 0.40% 38 1.95% /gpage22.html
6 57 0.34% 32 1.64% /gpage12.html
7 60 0.36% 31 1.59% /gpage18.html
8 54 0.32% 30 1.54% /gpage16.html
9 46 0.27% 26 1.33% /gpage13.html
10 37 0.22% 24 1.23% /gpage10.html
11 48 0.29% 24 1.23% /gpage38.html
12 32 0.19% 23 1.18% /
13 42 0.25% 20 1.03% /gpage19.html
14 40 0.24% 20 1.03% /gpage33.html
15 36 0.21% 19 0.97% /gpage2.html
16 46 0.27% 18 0.92% /gpage9.html
17 52 0.31% 17 0.87% /gpage29.html
18 40 0.24% 17 0.87% /gpage8.html
19 47 0.28% 16 0.82% /gpage17.html
20 58 0.35% 16 0.82% /gpage26.html
21 39 0.23% 16 0.82% /gpage31.html
22 39 0.23% 15 0.77% /gpage21.html
23 57 0.34% 15 0.77% /gpage24.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page84
51
53
72
16of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
5 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
24 35 0.21% 14 0.72% /gpage15.html
25 35 0.21% 14 0.72% /gpage41.html
27 30 0.18% 12 0.62% /gpage14.html
28 37 0.22% 12 0.62% /gpage34.html
29 39 0.23% 11 0.56% /gpage23.html
30 32 0.19% 11 0.56% /gpage25.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1776 10.58% 997 50.63% /default.htm
2 187 1.11% 149 7.57% /gpage30.html
3 147 0.88% 115 5.84% /index-2.html
4 67 0.40% 42 2.13% /gpage22.html
5 69 0.41% 40 2.03% /gpage28.html
6 60 0.36% 32 1.63% /gpage18.html
7 54 0.32% 28 1.42% /gpage16.html
9 46 0.27% 26 1.32% /gpage13.html
10 58 0.35% 26 1.32% /gpage26.html
11 48 0.29% 25 1.27% /gpage38.html
12 46 0.27% 23 1.17% /gpage9.html
13 40 0.24% 22 1.12% /gpage8.html
14 43 0.26% 21 1.07% /gpage39.html
15 32 0.19% 20 1.02% /

1 715 4.26% 62 1.69% 20689 4.75% 56 2.77% 74.99.172.251
2 500 2.98% 3 0.08% 2411 0.55% 3 0.15% 31.54.168.4
3 451 2.69% 7 0.19% 1247 0.29% 1 0.05% 50.84.129.124
4 446 2.66% 5 0.14% 1297 0.30% 1 0.05% 174.59.206.16
5 325 1.94% 25 0.68% 8407 1.93% 25 1.24% 108.39.185.157
6 259 1.54% 2 0.05% 1084 0.25% 1 0.05% 86.180.210.254
7 246 1.47% 4 0.11% 739 0.17% 2 0.10% 108.79.213.24
8 232 1.38% 2 0.05% 759 0.17% 3 0.15% 66.87.148.184
9 191 1.14% 3 0.08% 753 0.17% 1 0.05% 166.137.244.64
10 174 1.04% 3 0.08% 915 0.21% 1 0.05% 67.170.88.139
11 165 0.98% 1 0.03% 603 0.14% 1 0.05% 50.164.67.20
12 163 0.97% 1 0.03% 797 0.18% 1 0.05% 98.155.51.224
13 157 0.94% 0 0.00% 274 0.06% 1 0.05% 115.119.115.234
14 129 0.77% 1 0.03% 301 0.07% 1 0.05% 62.255.51.195
15 127 0.76% 1 0.03% 282 0.06% 1 0.05% 174.54.161.224
16 123 0.73% 4 0.11% 1203 0.28% 1 0.05% 72.65.56.194
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page85
52
54
73
17of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
6 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
17 121 0.72% 1 0.03% 271 0.06% 1 0.05% 73.52.120.52
18 115 0.69% 2 0.05% 319 0.07% 2 0.10% 174.54.209.40
19 114 0.68% 1 0.03% 513 0.12% 1 0.05% 148.75.170.253
20 114 0.68% 1 0.03% 257 0.06% 1 0.05% 174.200.19.155
21 114 0.68% 2 0.05% 311 0.07% 1 0.05% 73.79.232.211
22 114 0.68% 2 0.05% 770 0.18% 1 0.05% 99.101.240.35
23 113 0.67% 1 0.03% 315 0.07% 1 0.05% 195.138.82.51
24 113 0.67% 1 0.03% 290 0.07% 1 0.05% 98.235.81.158
25 112 0.67% 2 0.05% 962 0.22% 1 0.05% 91.181.174.61
26 108 0.64% 1 0.03% 248 0.06% 1 0.05% 170.122.0.5
27 108 0.64% 1 0.03% 248 0.06% 1 0.05% 174.200.22.35
28 107 0.64% 1 0.03% 699 0.16% 1 0.05% 51.39.63.141
29 90 0.54% 90 2.45% 5461 1.25% 15 0.74% 178.137.160.205
30 82 0.49% 1 0.03% 203 0.05% 1 0.05% 73.187.248.99
31 79 0.47% 79 2.15% 4793 1.10% 23 1.14% 46.118.119.71
32 78 0.46% 78 2.13% 18688 4.29% 76 3.76% 195.154.250.39
33 77 0.46% 77 2.10% 4672 1.07% 27 1.34% 178.137.17.180
34 77 0.46% 1 0.03% 194 0.04% 1 0.05% 73.164.90.15
35 69 0.41% 69 1.88% 4187 0.96% 23 1.14% 134.249.232.160
36 69 0.41% 69 1.88% 4187 0.96% 8 0.40% 37.115.184.191
37 68 0.41% 1 0.03% 631 0.14% 1 0.05% 137.91.114.239
38 67 0.40% 2 0.05% 625 0.14% 1 0.05% 77.162.235.39
39 66 0.39% 1 0.03% 175 0.04% 1 0.05% 174.60.213.112
40 66 0.39% 1 0.03% 168 0.04% 1 0.05% 198.24.193.106
41 64 0.38% 64 1.74% 3883 0.89% 15 0.74% 134.249.65.218
42 64 0.38% 1 0.03% 624 0.14% 1 0.05% 50.27.113.245
43 63 0.38% 1 0.03% 622 0.14% 1 0.05% 172.58.19.128
44 63 0.38% 1 0.03% 266 0.06% 1 0.05% 176.94.39.246
45 62 0.37% 1 0.03% 620 0.14% 1 0.05% 69.145.11.151
46 62 0.37% 1 0.03% 620 0.14% 1 0.05% 82.19.139.30
47 62 0.37% 1 0.03% 265 0.06% 1 0.05% 86.90.160.176
48 61 0.36% 1 0.03% 420 0.10% 1 0.05% 204.235.168.36
49 61 0.36% 1 0.03% 618 0.14% 1 0.05% 49.15.137.226
50 61 0.36% 1 0.03% 420 0.10% 1 0.05% 50.152.120.25

1 715 4.26% 62 1.69% 20689 4.75% 56 2.77% 74.99.172.251
2 78 0.46% 78 2.13% 18688 4.29% 76 3.76% 195.154.250.39
3 325 1.94% 25 0.68% 8407 1.93% 25 1.24% 108.39.185.157
4 57 0.34% 53 1.44% 6118 1.40% 1 0.05% 149.56.17.11
5 52 0.31% 48 1.31% 5743 1.32% 1 0.05% 149.56.17.7
6 90 0.54% 90 2.45% 5461 1.25% 15 0.74% 178.137.160.205
7 52 0.31% 48 1.31% 5002 1.15% 2 0.10% 162.210.196.100
8 45 0.27% 44 1.20% 4967 1.14% 1 0.05% 178.238.235.184
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page86
53
55
74
18of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
7 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
9 79 0.47% 79 2.15% 4793 1.10% 23 1.14% 46.118.119.71
10 77 0.46% 77 2.10% 4672 1.07% 27 1.34% 178.137.17.180

# Hits Referrer
3 16 0.10% http://www.blagovest-med.ru/
4 15 0.09% http://chcu.net/
5 15 0.09% http://shitmovs.com/
6 15 0.09% http://vykup-avto-krasnodar.ru/
7 15 0.09% https://takeitdumps.com/
8 13 0.08% http://kinogonew.ru/
9 13 0.08% http://na-telefon.biz/docheri.html
10 12 0.07% http://australia-opening-times.com/
11 12 0.07% http://tomatis.gospartner.com/
12 12 0.07% http://ultramart.biz/
13 12 0.07% http://www.avtolombard-krasnodar.com/
14 11 0.07% http://buynorxx.com/
15 11 0.07% http://dokfilms.net/
16 11 0.07% http://expresstoplivo.ru/
17 11 0.07% http://kosynka-games.ru/
18 11 0.07% http://na-telefon.biz/po-imenam.html
19 10 0.06% http://rada.ru/souvenir/
20 10 0.06% http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html
22 9 0.05% http://alarmobninsk.ru/
23 9 0.05% http://avramstroy.ru/
24 9 0.05% http://brains2.biz/
25 9 0.05% http://ibb.com.ua/
26 9 0.05% http://kino-rating.ru/
27 9 0.05% http://kol-energo.ru/
28 9 0.05% http://kupitwindows.com/7/professional/
29 9 0.05% http://mylesosibirsk.ru/
30 9 0.05% http://nalogovyy-kodeks.ru/
31 9 0.05% http://obuv-kupit.ru/
32 9 0.05% http://sarf3omlat.com/
33 9 0.05% http://shinikiev.com.ua/
34 9 0.05% http://writed.net/
35 9 0.05% http://www.ledis.top/18-v-salone-krasoty-eteriya-odessa-soxranyayut-krasotu.html
36 9 0.05% http://www.mosrif.ru/
37 9 0.05% http://www.seeingmeerkat.com/
38 9 0.05% http://xn----7sbaphztdjeboffeiof6c.xn--p1ai/
39 9 0.05% http://xn--80aaomkdl5amcy.xn--p1ai/
40 9 0.05% http://xn--80ajbshivpvn2i.xn--p1ai/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page87
54
56
75
19of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
8 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
41 9 0.05% http://xn--h1aakne2ba.xn--p1ai/
42 8 0.05% http://gdebestkupit.ru/
43 8 0.05% http://www.absolute-s.ru/
44 8 0.05% https://www.brus.city/
45 7 0.04% http://autolombard-krasnodar.ru/
46 7 0.04% http://film-one.ru/
47 7 0.04% http://orenburg-gsm.ru/
48 7 0.04% http://ulanude.xrus.org/
49 7 0.04% http://www.all-number.com/
50 7 0.04% http://xn--b1ag5cfn.xn--p1ai/

1 1 50.00% how to develop unconscious mind in amemed iq
2 1 50.00% post office box experiment joint circuit in lab

# Hits User Agent
1 9200 54.83% Safari (OSX)
7 259 1.54% Opera
8 149 0.89% Firefox 3
10 105 0.63% bhcBot
12 50 0.30% newspaper/0.1.7
17 32 0.19% ltx71 - (http://ltx71.com/)
19 23 0.14% Twitterbot/1.0
23 9 0.05% Firefox 2
25 7 0.04% rogerbot/1.0 (http://moz.com/help/pro/what-is-rogerbot-, rogerbot-wherecat@moz.com)
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page88
55
57
76
20of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
9 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
28 5 0.03% Netscape 4.7

1 10064 59.98% 1588 43.28% 223624 51.35% United States
2 1376 8.20% 131 3.57% 18860 4.33% Great Britain (UK)
3 1074 6.40% 926 25.24% 57942 13.30% Ukraine
4 867 5.17% 21 0.57% 3160 0.73% Brazil
5 519 3.09% 3 0.08% 1184 0.27% Czech Republic
6 518 3.09% 404 11.01% 43993 10.10% China
7 415 2.47% 177 4.82% 18419 4.23% Germany
8 312 1.86% 6 0.16% 1998 0.46% India
10 179 1.07% 154 4.20% 26971 6.19% France
11 173 1.03% 5 0.14% 1051 0.24% Argentina
12 141 0.84% 9 0.25% 1264 0.29% Netherlands
13 117 0.70% 2 0.05% 791 0.18% European Union
14 112 0.67% 2 0.05% 962 0.22% Belgium
15 111 0.66% 2 0.05% 312 0.07% Mexico
17 60 0.36% 4 0.11% 1889 0.43% Pakistan
18 59 0.35% 2 0.05% 733 0.17% Sweden
19 58 0.35% 2 0.05% 220 0.05% Philippines
20 58 0.35% 1 0.03% 157 0.04% Thailand
21 54 0.32% 1 0.03% 606 0.14% Hungary
22 48 0.29% 1 0.03% 143 0.03% Serbia
23 41 0.24% 40 1.09% 4684 1.08% Dominica
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page89
56
58
77
21of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
10 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
24 18 0.11% 15 0.41% 1414 0.32% Canada
25 18 0.11% 6 0.16% 709 0.16% Italy
26 14 0.08% 3 0.08% 333 0.08% Indonesia
27 14 0.08% 12 0.33% 1124 0.26% Ireland
28 7 0.04% 0 0.00% 12 0.00% Poland
29 7 0.04% 5 0.14% 1014 0.23% Romania
30 6 0.04% 5 0.14% 305 0.07% Switzerland
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page90
57
59
78
22of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
11 of 11 10/22/2016 5:38 AM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - August 2016 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201608.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: August 2016
Generated 01-Sep-2016 04:21 GMT
Monthly Statistics for August 2016

Total Hits 26977
Total Files 4067
Total Pages 4406
Total Visits 2090
Total KBytes 504017
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 35 96
Code 200 - OK 15.08% 4067
Code 404 - Not Found 84.29% 22738
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page91
58
60
79
23of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
1 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for August 2016

1 590 2.19% 185 4.55% 192 4.36% 61 2.92% 55 5.04% 25142 4.99%
2 5779 21.42% 257 6.32% 268 6.08% 105 5.02% 95 8.71% 41246 8.18%
3 1713 6.35% 89 2.19% 117 2.66% 68 3.25% 61 5.59% 13037 2.59%
4 1903 7.05% 200 4.92% 211 4.79% 96 4.59% 80 7.33% 30313 6.01%
5 832 3.08% 119 2.93% 123 2.79% 73 3.49% 64 5.87% 13576 2.69%
6 337 1.25% 124 3.05% 131 2.97% 55 2.63% 44 4.03% 15008 2.98%
7 238 0.88% 91 2.24% 105 2.38% 63 3.01% 49 4.49% 8181 1.62%
8 821 3.04% 77 1.89% 87 1.97% 61 2.92% 57 5.22% 10759 2.13%
9 926 3.43% 92 2.26% 100 2.27% 63 3.01% 55 5.04% 10877 2.16%
10 689 2.55% 143 3.52% 148 3.36% 58 2.78% 46 4.22% 19210 3.81%
11 382 1.42% 86 2.11% 96 2.18% 51 2.44% 48 4.40% 8497 1.69%
12 345 1.28% 88 2.16% 93 2.11% 72 3.44% 64 5.87% 9771 1.94%
13 508 1.88% 90 2.21% 95 2.16% 59 2.82% 56 5.13% 10012 1.99%
14 289 1.07% 106 2.61% 113 2.56% 50 2.39% 50 4.58% 11716 2.32%
15 493 1.83% 118 2.90% 121 2.75% 68 3.25% 59 5.41% 15144 3.00%
16 498 1.85% 107 2.63% 118 2.68% 62 2.97% 57 5.22% 12969 2.57%
17 556 2.06% 128 3.15% 148 3.36% 63 3.01% 50 4.58% 15869 3.15%
18 467 1.73% 130 3.20% 144 3.27% 64 3.06% 62 5.68% 13942 2.77%
19 546 2.02% 111 2.73% 116 2.63% 65 3.11% 63 5.77% 11795 2.34%
20 709 2.63% 139 3.42% 151 3.43% 57 2.73% 53 4.86% 16748 3.32%
21 272 1.01% 78 1.92% 84 1.91% 54 2.58% 48 4.40% 8047 1.60%
22 1183 4.39% 105 2.58% 109 2.47% 61 2.92% 53 4.86% 12989 2.58%
23 600 2.22% 150 3.69% 156 3.54% 82 3.92% 75 6.87% 24238 4.81%
24 2067 7.66% 181 4.45% 196 4.45% 93 4.45% 96 8.80% 22873 4.54%
25 406 1.50% 108 2.66% 113 2.56% 63 3.01% 71 6.51% 10740 2.13%
26 645 2.39% 106 2.61% 117 2.66% 70 3.35% 63 5.77% 14340 2.85%
27 333 1.23% 169 4.16% 184 4.18% 65 3.11% 72 6.60% 19838 3.94%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page92
59
61
80
24of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
2 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
28 339 1.26% 137 3.37% 146 3.31% 80 3.83% 55 5.04% 15301 3.04%
29 305 1.13% 87 2.14% 109 2.47% 65 3.11% 60 5.50% 8628 1.71%
30 1186 4.40% 98 2.41% 107 2.43% 60 2.87% 53 4.86% 10877 2.16%
31 1020 3.78% 368 9.05% 408 9.26% 84 4.02% 83 7.61% 42334 8.40%
Hourly Statistics for August 2016

Hour
0 34 1079 4.00% 6 187 4.60% 6 215 4.88% 709 21972 4.36%
1 27 853 3.16% 4 147 3.61% 5 162 3.68% 606 18800 3.73%
2 36 1132 4.20% 4 132 3.25% 4 140 3.18% 606 18789 3.73%
3 22 708 2.62% 4 140 3.44% 4 150 3.40% 644 19953 3.96%
4 23 721 2.67% 5 155 3.81% 5 164 3.72% 704 21816 4.33%
5 9 296 1.10% 5 172 4.23% 5 178 4.04% 618 19163 3.80%
6 14 449 1.66% 4 147 3.61% 5 158 3.59% 546 16924 3.36%
7 10 320 1.19% 3 101 2.48% 3 108 2.45% 345 10705 2.12%
8 13 422 1.56% 7 233 5.73% 8 260 5.90% 900 27895 5.53%
9 7 241 0.89% 2 75 1.84% 2 87 1.97% 287 8889 1.76%
10 10 314 1.16% 3 120 2.95% 4 133 3.02% 390 12086 2.40%
11 29 925 3.43% 5 168 4.13% 5 173 3.93% 698 21638 4.29%
12 41 1279 4.74% 7 242 5.95% 8 252 5.72% 871 26992 5.36%
13 30 946 3.51% 3 122 3.00% 4 139 3.15% 577 17893 3.55%
14 21 675 2.50% 6 198 4.87% 6 214 4.86% 757 23472 4.66%
15 39 1230 4.56% 4 149 3.66% 5 170 3.86% 510 15801 3.14%
16 22 704 2.61% 3 118 2.90% 4 128 2.91% 450 13945 2.77%
17 69 2159 8.00% 6 200 4.92% 6 208 4.72% 842 26095 5.18%
18 55 1728 6.41% 6 206 5.07% 7 221 5.02% 859 26625 5.28%
19 60 1861 6.90% 5 178 4.38% 6 195 4.43% 815 25267 5.01%
20 31 961 3.56% 8 248 6.10% 8 265 6.01% 798 24729 4.91%
21 33 1035 3.84% 6 192 4.72% 6 208 4.72% 718 22244 4.41%
22 34 1082 4.01% 4 127 3.12% 4 136 3.09% 556 17225 3.42%
23 188 5857 21.71% 10 310 7.62% 11 342 7.76% 1455 45099 8.95%

# Hits KBytes URL
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page93
60
62
81
25of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
3 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
1 1834 6.80% 108242 21.48% /default.htm
2 283 1.05% 114653 22.75% /gpage30.html
3 98 0.36% 29634 5.88% /index-2.html
4 85 0.32% 9840 1.95% /gpage28.html
5 74 0.27% 5294 1.05% /gpage38.html
6 70 0.26% 6094 1.21% /gpage26.html
7 68 0.25% 35440 7.03% /gpage22.html
8 64 0.24% 2999 0.60% /gpage39.html
9 60 0.22% 6373 1.26% /gpage24.html
10 59 0.22% 3037 0.60% /gpage29.html
11 58 0.21% 2993 0.59% /gpage34.html
12 58 0.21% 8267 1.64% /gpage41.html
13 57 0.21% 8897 1.77% /gpage9.html
14 56 0.21% 7474 1.48% /gpage19.html
16 55 0.20% 3185 0.63% /gpage3.html
17 55 0.20% 6852 1.36% /gpage8.html
18 54 0.20% 13791 2.74% /gpage17.html
19 54 0.20% 6985 1.39% /gpage33.html
20 52 0.19% 3807 0.76% /gpage13.html
21 50 0.19% 11534 2.29% /gpage16.html
22 50 0.19% 5054 1.00% /gpage27.html
23 49 0.18% 2068 0.41% /gpage12.html
24 49 0.18% 2094 0.42% /gpage36.html
25 48 0.18% 6327 1.26% /gpage20.html
26 48 0.18% 4976 0.99% /gpage21.html
27 47 0.17% 2136 0.42% /gpage6.html
28 46 0.17% 3487 0.69% /gpage2.html
29 46 0.17% 2499 0.50% /gpage31.html
30 44 0.16% 1717 0.34% /gpage15.html
31 43 0.16% 1957 0.39% /gpage25.html
32 41 0.15% 5211 1.03% /gpage10.html
33 41 0.15% 2686 0.53% /gpage23.html
34 41 0.15% 1980 0.39% /gpage32.html
35 41 0.15% 2533 0.50% /gpage37.html
36 40 0.15% 1577 0.31% /gpage7.html
37 35 0.13% 1615 0.32% /gpage11.html
38 34 0.13% 2207 0.44% /gpage1.html
39 31 0.11% 9518 1.89% /
40 30 0.11% 1113 0.22% /gpage40.html
41 29 0.11% 3125 0.62% /gpage18.html
42 29 0.11% 1216 0.24% /gpage4.html
43 26 0.10% 1006 0.20% /gpage14.html
44 23 0.09% 2083 0.41% /gpage5.html

# Hits KBytes URL
1 283 1.05% 114653 22.75% /gpage30.html
2 1834 6.80% 108242 21.48% /default.htm
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page94
61
63
82
26of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
4 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
3 68 0.25% 35440 7.03% /gpage22.html
4 98 0.36% 29634 5.88% /index-2.html
5 54 0.20% 13791 2.74% /gpage17.html
6 50 0.19% 11534 2.29% /gpage16.html
7 85 0.32% 9840 1.95% /gpage28.html
8 31 0.11% 9518 1.89% /
9 57 0.21% 8897 1.77% /gpage9.html
10 58 0.21% 8267 1.64% /gpage41.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1834 6.80% 1102 54.77% /default.htm
2 283 1.05% 231 11.48% /gpage30.html
3 98 0.36% 50 2.49% /index-2.html
4 85 0.32% 49 2.44% /gpage28.html
5 68 0.25% 38 1.89% /gpage22.html
6 49 0.18% 29 1.44% /gpage12.html
7 56 0.21% 24 1.19% /gpage19.html
8 74 0.27% 23 1.14% /gpage38.html
9 44 0.16% 22 1.09% /gpage15.html
10 31 0.11% 21 1.04% /
11 54 0.20% 21 1.04% /gpage17.html
12 48 0.18% 21 1.04% /gpage21.html
13 52 0.19% 20 0.99% /gpage13.html
14 59 0.22% 20 0.99% /gpage29.html
15 46 0.17% 19 0.94% /gpage2.html
16 50 0.19% 18 0.89% /gpage16.html
17 54 0.20% 18 0.89% /gpage33.html
18 58 0.21% 18 0.89% /gpage41.html
19 70 0.26% 17 0.84% /gpage26.html
20 55 0.20% 16 0.80% /gpage3.html
21 48 0.18% 15 0.75% /gpage20.html
22 46 0.17% 15 0.75% /gpage31.html
23 55 0.20% 14 0.70% /gpage8.html
25 41 0.15% 13 0.65% /gpage10.html
26 35 0.13% 13 0.65% /gpage11.html
27 50 0.19% 13 0.65% /gpage27.html
28 57 0.21% 13 0.65% /gpage9.html
29 41 0.15% 12 0.60% /gpage23.html
30 43 0.16% 12 0.60% /gpage25.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1834 6.80% 1086 53.21% /default.htm
2 283 1.05% 210 10.29% /gpage30.html
3 98 0.36% 54 2.65% /index-2.html
4 85 0.32% 42 2.06% /gpage28.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page95
62
64
83
27of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
5 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
5 68 0.25% 39 1.91% /gpage22.html
7 70 0.26% 28 1.37% /gpage26.html
8 56 0.21% 26 1.27% /gpage19.html
9 31 0.11% 25 1.22% /
10 55 0.20% 23 1.13% /gpage8.html
11 58 0.21% 21 1.03% /gpage41.html
12 57 0.21% 21 1.03% /gpage9.html
13 52 0.19% 20 0.98% /gpage13.html
14 54 0.20% 20 0.98% /gpage33.html
15 44 0.16% 19 0.93% /gpage15.html

1 605 2.24% 11 0.27% 2482 0.49% 1 0.05% 73.79.63.43
2 599 2.22% 6 0.15% 1785 0.35% 2 0.10% 192.216.120.25
3 583 2.16% 6 0.15% 1445 0.29% 1 0.05% 206.192.46.4
4 485 1.80% 8 0.20% 1386 0.28% 1 0.05% 67.234.218.177
5 448 1.66% 3 0.07% 941 0.19% 1 0.05% 63.66.64.246
6 435 1.61% 5 0.12% 1504 0.30% 4 0.19% 70.193.73.131
7 370 1.37% 3 0.07% 1002 0.20% 1 0.05% 72.25.49.185
8 369 1.37% 6 0.15% 1117 0.22% 1 0.05% 69.253.73.240
9 339 1.26% 5 0.12% 827 0.16% 1 0.05% 70.192.144.46
10 338 1.25% 2 0.05% 1163 0.23% 1 0.05% 74.99.129.35
11 294 1.09% 5 0.12% 913 0.18% 1 0.05% 54.174.58.30
12 291 1.08% 5 0.12% 1536 0.30% 1 0.05% 54.174.56.49
13 273 1.01% 2 0.05% 638 0.13% 1 0.05% 159.14.243.253
14 240 0.89% 6 0.15% 744 0.15% 2 0.10% 174.54.200.74
15 238 0.88% 4 0.10% 821 0.16% 1 0.05% 54.174.61.172
16 237 0.88% 4 0.10% 751 0.15% 1 0.05% 54.174.57.177
17 236 0.87% 4 0.10% 839 0.17% 1 0.05% 54.174.56.116
18 236 0.87% 4 0.10% 667 0.13% 1 0.05% 54.174.59.113
19 236 0.87% 4 0.10% 635 0.13% 1 0.05% 54.174.61.234
20 236 0.87% 4 0.10% 718 0.14% 1 0.05% 54.174.61.68
21 235 0.87% 4 0.10% 1392 0.28% 1 0.05% 54.174.59.227
22 224 0.83% 3 0.07% 861 0.17% 1 0.05% 12.159.160.146
23 219 0.81% 3 0.07% 532 0.11% 1 0.05% 174.201.8.187
24 205 0.76% 87 2.14% 10344 2.05% 1 0.05% 54.174.53.12
25 198 0.73% 6 0.15% 653 0.13% 1 0.05% 174.60.217.208
26 193 0.72% 2 0.05% 698 0.14% 1 0.05% 162.223.16.74
27 186 0.69% 2 0.05% 508 0.10% 1 0.05% 174.54.208.203
28 186 0.69% 4 0.10% 749 0.15% 1 0.05% 174.59.53.52
29 182 0.67% 22 0.54% 7216 1.43% 22 1.05% 74.99.172.251
30 179 0.66% 3 0.07% 815 0.16% 1 0.05% 54.174.59.161
31 179 0.66% 3 0.07% 942 0.19% 1 0.05% 66.191.170.90
32 178 0.66% 3 0.07% 759 0.15% 1 0.05% 54.174.56.143
33 177 0.66% 3 0.07% 934 0.19% 1 0.05% 54.174.61.41
34 176 0.65% 3 0.07% 571 0.11% 1 0.05% 54.174.59.91
35 176 0.65% 3 0.07% 994 0.20% 2 0.10% 73.187.61.99
36 174 0.64% 3 0.07% 736 0.15% 2 0.10% 73.214.5.113
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page96
63
65
84
28of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
6 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
37 173 0.64% 3 0.07% 506 0.10% 1 0.05% 54.174.54.236
38 169 0.63% 4 0.10% 1105 0.22% 1 0.05% 170.128.35.51
39 160 0.59% 1 0.02% 339 0.07% 1 0.05% 198.7.132.21
40 160 0.59% 1 0.02% 792 0.16% 1 0.05% 99.8.236.17
41 143 0.53% 2 0.05% 623 0.12% 1 0.05% 72.25.5.116
42 133 0.49% 3 0.07% 437 0.09% 1 0.05% 54.174.60.113
43 132 0.49% 2 0.05% 364 0.07% 1 0.05% 208.82.202.4
44 126 0.47% 2 0.05% 509 0.10% 1 0.05% 73.175.190.141
45 124 0.46% 5 0.12% 681 0.14% 1 0.05% 216.12.2.169
46 119 0.44% 2 0.05% 581 0.12% 1 0.05% 50.241.177.45
47 118 0.44% 2 0.05% 1037 0.21% 1 0.05% 205.197.242.145
48 118 0.44% 2 0.05% 416 0.08% 1 0.05% 54.174.53.147
49 118 0.44% 2 0.05% 385 0.08% 1 0.05% 54.174.53.246
50 118 0.44% 2 0.05% 522 0.10% 1 0.05% 54.174.56.131

1 91 0.34% 91 2.24% 22927 4.55% 88 4.21% 195.154.250.39
2 205 0.76% 87 2.14% 10344 2.05% 1 0.05% 54.174.53.12
3 105 0.39% 90 2.21% 9341 1.85% 1 0.05% 107.22.105.78
4 68 0.25% 63 1.55% 9015 1.79% 1 0.05% 72.76.221.220
5 182 0.67% 22 0.54% 7216 1.43% 22 1.05% 74.99.172.251
6 66 0.24% 63 1.55% 7055 1.40% 2 0.10% 144.76.153.198
7 89 0.33% 89 2.19% 5400 1.07% 26 1.24% 46.118.159.110
8 88 0.33% 88 2.16% 5339 1.06% 22 1.05% 46.119.116.73
9 86 0.32% 86 2.11% 5218 1.04% 21 1.00% 46.119.117.90
10 111 0.41% 43 1.06% 5207 1.03% 1 0.05% 82.80.230.228

# Hits Referrer
3 17 0.06% http://portal-eu.ru/
4 14 0.05% http://tver.xrus.org/
5 14 0.05% http://www.krasivye-devushki.net/
6 14 0.05% http://www.rospromtest.ru/sertifikati/deklaraciya-sootvetstviya-tamojennogo-soyuza/
7 13 0.05% http://xbaboon.com/
8 13 0.05% https://t.co/Wn9TFlFMo8
9 12 0.04% http://stavropol.xrus.org/
11 12 0.04% http://tomsk.xrus.org/
13 12 0.04% http://www.regionshop.biz/
14 11 0.04% http://naberezhnyechelny.xrus.org/
15 11 0.04% http://poisk-zakona.ru/zakon-ob-osago/
16 11 0.04% http://www.lenpipet.ru/
17 11 0.04% http://www.privatefx-in.ru/
18 10 0.04% http://calc-for-credit.ru/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page97
64
66
85
29of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
7 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
19 10 0.04% http://damaglamura.com/
20 10 0.04% http://interesnie-faktu.ru/
21 10 0.04% http://nizhnevartovsk.xrus.org/
22 10 0.04% http://xn--80aaagvmjabrs1aoc9luc.xn--p1ai/
25 9 0.03% http://eupornstar.info/
26 9 0.03% http://kw21.org/
29 9 0.03% http://orenburg.xrus.org/
30 9 0.03% http://pornogig.com/
31 9 0.03% http://www.voda.lv/
32 9 0.03% http://xn-----8kcatubaocd1bneepefojs1h2e.xn--p1ai/
33 9 0.03% http://xn----7sbahjd3btneuw1joc.xn--p1ai/
34 9 0.03% http://xn----7sbaphztdjeboffeiof6c.xn--p1ai/
35 8 0.03% http://chiptuninger.com/
36 8 0.03% http://firma-legion.ru/
37 8 0.03% http://gdebestkupit.ru/
38 8 0.03% http://isistaylorporn.info/
40 8 0.03% http://segol.tv/
41 8 0.03% http://simferopol.xrus.org/
42 8 0.03% http://surgut.xrus.org/
43 8 0.03% http://ulyanovsk.xrus.org/
44 8 0.03% http://waukeen.com.ua/
45 8 0.03% http://xn--80aebbcbcdemfkhba4byaehoejh8dza3v.xn--p1ai/
46 8 0.03% http://yaroslavl.xrus.org/
47 7 0.03% http://cool-wedding.net/dresses
48 7 0.03% http://kostroma.xrus.org/
49 7 0.03% http://lostfilm-online.ru/
50 7 0.03% http://trudogolik.net/

1 1 50.00% documentary -youtube. united states suppressed secret -david
2 1 50.00% i no 97 mmpistan ring sige

# Hits User Agent
1 16499 61.16% Safari (OSX)
6 203 0.75% Opera
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page98
65
67
86
30of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
8 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
9 188 0.70% Firefox 3
15 50 0.19% newspaper/0.1.7
16 47 0.17% NextGenSearchBot 1 (for information visit http://www.zoominfo.com/About/misc/NextGenSearchBot.aspx)
20 21 0.08% Twitterbot/1.0
21 15 0.06% Firefox 2
29 6 0.02% }__test|O:21:"JDatabaseDriverMysqli":3:{s:2:"fc";O:17:"JSimplepieFactory":0:{}s:21:"\0\0\0disconnectHandlers";a:1:{i:0;a:2:{i
30 4 0.01% Who.is Bot

1 22353 82.86% 1923 47.28% 265011 52.58% United States
2 921 3.41% 911 22.40% 56575 11.22% Ukraine
3 513 1.90% 421 10.35% 50211 9.96% China
4 412 1.53% 285 7.01% 30309 6.01% Germany
6 287 1.06% 75 1.84% 10069 2.00% Great Britain (UK)
7 278 1.03% 2 0.05% 1180 0.23% Czech Republic
8 250 0.93% 175 4.30% 35342 7.01% France
9 234 0.87% 7 0.17% 2103 0.42% India
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page99
66
68
87
31of
of141
108
110
129
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
9 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
by
ToOMNIS
October
MEDIA
since
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
10 198 0.73% 22 0.54% 4523 0.90% Canada
11 181 0.67% 8 0.20% 1694 0.34% Brazil
12 176 0.65% 4 0.10% 1547 0.31% Australia
13 173 0.64% 44 1.08% 5827 1.16% Israel
14 70 0.26% 10 0.25% 1201 0.24% Netherlands
15 69 0.26% 4 0.10% 746 0.15% Switzerland
16 65 0.24% 2 0.05% 621 0.12% Austria
17 65 0.24% 6 0.15% 1379 0.27% Pakistan
18 56 0.21% 1 0.02% 157 0.03% Mexico
19 55 0.20% 1 0.02% 155 0.03% Peru
20 45 0.17% 43 1.06% 4876 0.97% Dominica
21 45 0.17% 23 0.57% 3619 0.72% Italy
23 18 0.07% 16 0.39% 4406 0.87% Romania
24 14 0.05% 14 0.34% 2322 0.46% Japan
25 12 0.04% 7 0.17% 478 0.09% Philippines
26 7 0.03% 1 0.02% 70 0.01% Ireland
27 7 0.03% 5 0.12% 710 0.14% Sweden
29 6 0.02% 4 0.10% 1152 0.23% Serbia
30 4 0.01% 2 0.05% 125 0.02% Argentina
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page100
67
69
88
32of
of129
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
March 10,
22, 2017
12, 2016
10 of 10 10/8/2016 5:08 AM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - Summary... http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary by Month
Generated 18-Aug-2016 07:25 GMT
Summary by Month
Daily Avg Monthly Totals
Month
Hits Files Pages Visits Sites KBytes Visits Pages Files Hits
Aug 2016 994 123 133 66 617 271328 1127 2266 2100 16899
Jul 2016 694 126 141 68 1163 514193 2133 4377 3926 21516
Jun 2016 771 111 118 65 1148 445134 1967 3568 3349 23141
May 2016 891 115 128 68 1230 476902 2125 3978 3587 27639
Apr 2016 1407 117 514 64 1395 493708 1939 15446 3529 42228
Mar 2016 865 108 116 64 1236 427679 1998 3612 3375 26821
Feb 2016 707 104 119 68 1232 375237 2000 3461 3034 20504
Jan 2016 618 107 116 61 1178 394540 1897 3596 3325 19186
2016 3398721 15186 40304 26225 197934
2015
Dec 2015 617 95 105 56 1011 382131 1766 3262 2975 19132
Nov 2015 328 71 84 47 906 257996 1414 2538 2158 9868
Oct 2015 312 48 55 41 424 70549 539 716 626 4060
2015 710676 3719 6516 5759 33060
Totals 4109397 18905 46820 31984 230994
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page101
68
70
89
33
1 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
1 of 1 8/18/2016 2:55 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: August 2016
Monthly Statistics for August 2016

Total Hits 16899
Total Files 2100
Total Pages 2266
Total Visits 1127
Total KBytes 271328
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 36 95
Code 200 - OK 12.43% 2100
Code 404 - Not Found 87.05% 14710
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page102
69
71
90
34
2 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
1 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for August 2016

1 590 3.49% 185 8.81% 192 8.47% 61 5.41% 55 8.91% 25142 9.27%
2 5779 34.20% 257 12.24% 268 11.83% 105 9.32% 95 15.40% 41246 15.20%
3 1713 10.14% 89 4.24% 117 5.16% 68 6.03% 61 9.89% 13037 4.81%
4 1903 11.26% 200 9.52% 211 9.31% 96 8.52% 80 12.97% 30313 11.17%
5 832 4.92% 119 5.67% 123 5.43% 73 6.48% 64 10.37% 13576 5.00%
6 337 1.99% 124 5.90% 131 5.78% 55 4.88% 44 7.13% 15008 5.53%
7 238 1.41% 91 4.33% 105 4.63% 63 5.59% 49 7.94% 8181 3.02%
8 821 4.86% 77 3.67% 87 3.84% 61 5.41% 57 9.24% 10759 3.97%
9 926 5.48% 92 4.38% 100 4.41% 63 5.59% 55 8.91% 10877 4.01%
10 689 4.08% 143 6.81% 148 6.53% 58 5.15% 46 7.46% 19210 7.08%
11 382 2.26% 86 4.10% 96 4.24% 51 4.53% 48 7.78% 8497 3.13%
12 345 2.04% 88 4.19% 93 4.10% 72 6.39% 64 10.37% 9771 3.60%
13 508 3.01% 90 4.29% 95 4.19% 59 5.24% 56 9.08% 10012 3.69%
14 289 1.71% 106 5.05% 113 4.99% 50 4.44% 50 8.10% 11716 4.32%
15 493 2.92% 118 5.62% 121 5.34% 68 6.03% 59 9.56% 15144 5.58%
16 498 2.95% 107 5.10% 118 5.21% 62 5.50% 57 9.24% 12969 4.78%
17 556 3.29% 128 6.10% 148 6.53% 63 5.59% 50 8.10% 15869 5.85%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page103
70
72
91
35
3 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
2 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Hourly Statistics for August 2016

Hour
0 25 430 2.54% 4 84 4.00% 6 106 4.68% 576 9794 3.61%
1 28 477 2.82% 6 106 5.05% 6 113 4.99% 746 12683 4.67%
2 39 679 4.02% 2 45 2.14% 2 48 2.12% 460 7818 2.88%
3 32 545 3.23% 3 54 2.57% 3 58 2.56% 565 9609 3.54%
4 15 270 1.60% 4 82 3.90% 5 86 3.80% 615 10450 3.85%
5 7 123 0.73% 3 54 2.57% 3 55 2.43% 327 5552 2.05%
6 9 154 0.91% 2 49 2.33% 3 51 2.25% 239 4069 1.50%
7 8 138 0.82% 2 49 2.33% 3 52 2.29% 272 4621 1.70%
8 15 261 1.54% 6 106 5.05% 6 113 4.99% 863 14665 5.40%
9 4 80 0.47% 3 51 2.43% 3 56 2.47% 248 4213 1.55%
10 7 119 0.70% 4 68 3.24% 4 73 3.22% 459 7806 2.88%
11 32 550 3.25% 4 76 3.62% 4 79 3.49% 575 9772 3.60%
12 44 753 4.46% 8 140 6.67% 8 146 6.44% 873 14847 5.47%
13 51 883 5.23% 5 85 4.05% 5 100 4.41% 767 13034 4.80%
14 34 585 3.46% 7 132 6.29% 8 141 6.22% 1020 17332 6.39%
15 22 382 2.26% 3 62 2.95% 4 72 3.18% 442 7514 2.77%
16 21 361 2.14% 3 60 2.86% 3 63 2.78% 416 7070 2.61%
17 101 1719 10.17% 4 71 3.38% 4 74 3.27% 610 10369 3.82%
18 44 755 4.47% 4 79 3.76% 5 88 3.88% 632 10744 3.96%
19 39 679 4.02% 5 90 4.29% 5 98 4.32% 817 13888 5.12%
20 35 597 3.53% 6 114 5.43% 7 121 5.34% 689 11713 4.32%
21 33 573 3.39% 7 123 5.86% 7 134 5.91% 869 14766 5.44%
22 17 296 1.75% 4 69 3.29% 4 74 3.27% 579 9842 3.63%
23 322 5490 32.49% 14 251 11.95% 15 265 11.69% 2303 39156 14.43%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 865 5.12% 51149 18.85% /default.htm
2 146 0.86% 56562 20.85% /gpage30.html
3 54 0.32% 16142 5.95% /index-2.html
4 51 0.30% 6000 2.21% /gpage28.html
5 40 0.24% 22241 8.20% /gpage22.html
6 40 0.24% 3374 1.24% /gpage26.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page104
71
73
92
36
4 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
3 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
7 39 0.23% 2795 1.03% /gpage38.html
8 36 0.21% 1693 0.62% /gpage39.html
9 34 0.20% 1822 0.67% /gpage29.html
10 33 0.20% 3516 1.30% /gpage24.html
11 33 0.20% 1899 0.70% /gpage3.html
12 32 0.19% 2359 0.87% /gpage13.html
13 32 0.19% 4168 1.54% /gpage19.html
14 31 0.18% 6969 2.57% /gpage16.html
15 31 0.18% 1537 0.57% /gpage34.html
16 30 0.18% 3904 1.44% /gpage20.html
17 30 0.18% 4240 1.56% /gpage41.html
18 30 0.18% 3749 1.38% /gpage8.html
19 29 0.17% 2964 1.09% /gpage21.html
20 29 0.17% 3761 1.39% /gpage33.html
21 28 0.17% 1206 0.44% /gpage12.html
22 28 0.17% 2076 0.77% /gpage2.html
23 28 0.17% 4417 1.63% /gpage9.html
24 27 0.16% 6896 2.54% /gpage17.html
26 26 0.15% 1420 0.52% /gpage31.html
27 26 0.15% 1114 0.41% /gpage36.html
28 26 0.15% 1213 0.45% /gpage6.html
29 26 0.15% 1008 0.37% /gpage7.html
30 23 0.14% 6996 2.58% /
31 23 0.14% 2866 1.06% /gpage10.html
32 23 0.14% 900 0.33% /gpage15.html
33 23 0.14% 1478 0.54% /gpage23.html
34 22 0.13% 1448 0.53% /gpage1.html
35 22 0.13% 1040 0.38% /gpage32.html
36 21 0.12% 1027 0.38% /gpage11.html
37 21 0.12% 932 0.34% /gpage25.html
38 21 0.12% 2150 0.79% /gpage27.html
39 21 0.12% 1267 0.47% /gpage37.html
40 20 0.12% 869 0.32% /gpage4.html
41 18 0.11% 1897 0.70% /gpage18.html
42 16 0.09% 594 0.22% /gpage40.html
43 12 0.07% 483 0.18% /gpage14.html
44 12 0.07% 1146 0.42% /gpage5.html

# Hits KBytes URL
1 146 0.86% 56562 20.85% /gpage30.html
2 865 5.12% 51149 18.85% /default.htm
3 40 0.24% 22241 8.20% /gpage22.html
4 54 0.32% 16142 5.95% /index-2.html
5 23 0.14% 6996 2.58% /
6 31 0.18% 6969 2.57% /gpage16.html
7 27 0.16% 6896 2.54% /gpage17.html
8 51 0.30% 6000 2.21% /gpage28.html
9 28 0.17% 4417 1.63% /gpage9.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page105
72
74
93
37
5 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
4 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
10 30 0.18% 4240 1.56% /gpage41.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 865 5.12% 584 53.24% /default.htm
2 146 0.86% 121 11.03% /gpage30.html
3 51 0.30% 32 2.92% /gpage28.html
4 54 0.32% 32 2.92% /index-2.html
5 40 0.24% 21 1.91% /gpage22.html
6 23 0.14% 15 1.37% /
7 28 0.17% 14 1.28% /gpage12.html
8 32 0.19% 14 1.28% /gpage13.html
9 32 0.19% 14 1.28% /gpage19.html
10 29 0.17% 14 1.28% /gpage21.html
11 34 0.20% 12 1.09% /gpage29.html
12 23 0.14% 11 1.00% /gpage15.html
13 30 0.18% 11 1.00% /gpage20.html
14 31 0.18% 10 0.91% /gpage16.html
15 28 0.17% 10 0.91% /gpage2.html
16 40 0.24% 10 0.91% /gpage26.html
17 29 0.17% 10 0.91% /gpage33.html
18 39 0.23% 10 0.91% /gpage38.html
19 23 0.14% 9 0.82% /gpage23.html
20 30 0.18% 9 0.82% /gpage41.html
21 30 0.18% 9 0.82% /gpage8.html
22 27 0.16% 8 0.73% /gpage17.html
23 33 0.20% 8 0.73% /gpage3.html
24 26 0.15% 8 0.73% /gpage31.html
25 31 0.18% 8 0.73% /gpage34.html
26 23 0.14% 7 0.64% /gpage10.html
27 21 0.12% 7 0.64% /gpage11.html
28 21 0.12% 7 0.64% /gpage25.html
29 26 0.15% 7 0.64% /gpage6.html
30 26 0.15% 7 0.64% /gpage7.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 865 5.12% 570 51.68% /default.htm
2 146 0.86% 110 9.97% /gpage30.html
3 54 0.32% 31 2.81% /index-2.html
4 51 0.30% 27 2.45% /gpage28.html
5 40 0.24% 20 1.81% /gpage22.html
6 23 0.14% 16 1.45% /
8 32 0.19% 15 1.36% /gpage19.html
9 40 0.24% 15 1.36% /gpage26.html
10 30 0.18% 15 1.36% /gpage8.html
11 36 0.21% 13 1.18% /gpage39.html
12 30 0.18% 13 1.18% /gpage41.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page106
73
75
94
38
6 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
5 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
13 32 0.19% 12 1.09% /gpage13.html
14 30 0.18% 12 1.09% /gpage20.html
15 23 0.14% 11 1.00% /gpage15.html

1 605 3.58% 11 0.52% 2482 0.91% 1 0.09% 73.79.63.43
2 448 2.65% 3 0.14% 941 0.35% 1 0.09% 63.66.64.246
3 435 2.57% 5 0.24% 1504 0.55% 4 0.35% 70.193.73.131
4 370 2.19% 3 0.14% 1002 0.37% 1 0.09% 72.25.49.185
5 339 2.01% 5 0.24% 827 0.30% 1 0.09% 70.192.144.46
6 338 2.00% 2 0.10% 1163 0.43% 1 0.09% 74.99.129.35
7 294 1.74% 5 0.24% 913 0.34% 1 0.09% 54.174.58.30
8 291 1.72% 5 0.24% 1536 0.57% 1 0.09% 54.174.56.49
9 238 1.41% 4 0.19% 821 0.30% 1 0.09% 54.174.61.172
10 237 1.40% 4 0.19% 751 0.28% 1 0.09% 54.174.57.177
11 236 1.40% 4 0.19% 839 0.31% 1 0.09% 54.174.56.116
12 236 1.40% 4 0.19% 667 0.25% 1 0.09% 54.174.59.113
13 236 1.40% 4 0.19% 635 0.23% 1 0.09% 54.174.61.234
14 236 1.40% 4 0.19% 718 0.26% 1 0.09% 54.174.61.68
15 235 1.39% 4 0.19% 1392 0.51% 1 0.09% 54.174.59.227
16 205 1.21% 87 4.14% 10344 3.81% 1 0.09% 54.174.53.12
17 198 1.17% 6 0.29% 653 0.24% 1 0.09% 174.60.217.208
18 193 1.14% 2 0.10% 698 0.26% 1 0.09% 162.223.16.74
19 186 1.10% 2 0.10% 508 0.19% 1 0.09% 174.54.208.203
20 179 1.06% 3 0.14% 815 0.30% 1 0.09% 54.174.59.161
21 179 1.06% 3 0.14% 942 0.35% 1 0.09% 66.191.170.90
22 178 1.05% 3 0.14% 759 0.28% 1 0.09% 54.174.56.143
23 177 1.05% 3 0.14% 934 0.34% 1 0.09% 54.174.61.41
24 176 1.04% 3 0.14% 571 0.21% 1 0.09% 54.174.59.91
25 174 1.03% 3 0.14% 736 0.27% 2 0.18% 73.214.5.113
26 173 1.02% 3 0.14% 506 0.19% 1 0.09% 54.174.54.236
27 160 0.95% 1 0.05% 339 0.13% 1 0.09% 198.7.132.21
28 160 0.95% 1 0.05% 792 0.29% 1 0.09% 99.8.236.17
29 143 0.85% 2 0.10% 623 0.23% 1 0.09% 72.25.5.116
30 134 0.79% 14 0.67% 4624 1.70% 14 1.24% 74.99.172.251
31 133 0.79% 3 0.14% 437 0.16% 1 0.09% 54.174.60.113
32 132 0.78% 2 0.10% 364 0.13% 1 0.09% 208.82.202.4
33 129 0.76% 2 0.10% 599 0.22% 1 0.09% 192.216.120.25
34 126 0.75% 2 0.10% 509 0.19% 1 0.09% 73.175.190.141
35 124 0.73% 5 0.24% 681 0.25% 1 0.09% 216.12.2.169
36 119 0.70% 2 0.10% 581 0.21% 1 0.09% 50.241.177.45
37 118 0.70% 2 0.10% 1037 0.38% 1 0.09% 205.197.242.145
38 118 0.70% 2 0.10% 416 0.15% 1 0.09% 54.174.53.147
39 118 0.70% 2 0.10% 385 0.14% 1 0.09% 54.174.53.246
40 118 0.70% 2 0.10% 522 0.19% 1 0.09% 54.174.56.131
41 118 0.70% 2 0.10% 379 0.14% 1 0.09% 54.174.57.79
42 118 0.70% 2 0.10% 866 0.32% 1 0.09% 54.174.58.32
43 117 0.69% 1 0.05% 264 0.10% 1 0.09% 192.35.35.34
44 117 0.69% 2 0.10% 572 0.21% 1 0.09% 50.32.213.169
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page107
74
76
95
39
7 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
6 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
45 117 0.69% 2 0.10% 339 0.12% 1 0.09% 54.174.56.252
46 117 0.69% 1 0.05% 717 0.26% 1 0.09% 73.112.16.34
47 116 0.69% 2 0.10% 463 0.17% 1 0.09% 54.174.56.70
48 116 0.69% 2 0.10% 310 0.11% 1 0.09% 54.174.57.7
49 114 0.67% 2 0.10% 754 0.28% 1 0.09% 67.11.12.107
50 113 0.67% 1 0.05% 710 0.26% 1 0.09% 172.74.202.75

1 47 0.28% 47 2.24% 11836 4.36% 46 4.08% 195.154.250.39
2 205 1.21% 87 4.14% 10344 3.81% 1 0.09% 54.174.53.12
3 68 0.40% 63 3.00% 9015 3.32% 1 0.09% 72.76.221.220
4 111 0.66% 43 2.05% 5207 1.92% 1 0.09% 82.80.230.228
5 47 0.28% 43 2.05% 5095 1.88% 1 0.09% 40.143.1.4
6 63 0.37% 21 1.00% 4895 1.80% 8 0.71% 40.77.167.94
7 134 0.79% 14 0.67% 4624 1.70% 14 1.24% 74.99.172.251
8 48 0.28% 43 2.05% 4396 1.62% 1 0.09% 104.131.97.136
9 48 0.28% 43 2.05% 4332 1.60% 1 0.09% 104.131.214.104
10 38 0.22% 32 1.52% 4197 1.55% 1 0.09% 78.129.250.17

# Hits Referrer
4 9 0.05% http://xn-----8kcatubaocd1bneepefojs1h2e.xn--p1ai/
6 8 0.05% http://poisk-zakona.ru/zakon-ob-osago/
8 8 0.05% http://www.krasivye-devushki.net/
9 8 0.05% http://xn--80aebbcbcdemfkhba4byaehoejh8dza3v.xn--p1ai/
11 6 0.04% http://esk-sambist.ru/
14 6 0.04% http://portal-eu.ru/
15 6 0.04% http://segol.tv/
16 6 0.04% http://surgut.xrus.org/
17 6 0.04% http://tomsk.xrus.org/
19 5 0.03% http://isistaylorporn.info/
20 5 0.03% http://kinostorm.net/
21 5 0.03% http://naberezhnyechelny.xrus.org/
23 5 0.03% http://sevastopol.xrus.org/
24 5 0.03% http://vladivostok.xrus.org/
25 5 0.03% http://www.all-number.com/
26 5 0.03% http://www.exchanges-bet.com/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page108
75
77
96
40
8 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
7 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
28 5 0.03% http://zajm-pod-zalog-nedvizhimosti.ru/
29 4 0.02% http://avtoguru.pro/
30 4 0.02% http://carsplate.com/
31 4 0.02% http://diksi-mebel.ru/
32 4 0.02% http://freshwallpapers.info/
33 4 0.02% http://kino-rating.ru/
34 4 0.02% http://o-dachnik.ru/
37 4 0.02% http://wallpapersdesk.info/
38 4 0.02% http://www.symbol-s.ru/
39 4 0.02% http://xbaboon.com/
40 4 0.02% http://yalta.xrus.org/
42 3 0.02% http://autoplate.info/
43 3 0.02% http://avramstroy.ru/
44 3 0.02% http://ayakino.net/
45 3 0.02% http://cheboksary.xrus.org/
46 3 0.02% http://domdeco.net/
47 3 0.02% http://education-cz.ru/
48 3 0.02% http://eupornstar.info/
49 3 0.02% http://interiordesignpics.com/
50 3 0.02% http://ivanovo.xrus.org/

1 1 100.00% documentary -youtube. united states suppressed secret -david

# Hits User Agent
1 11371 67.29% Safari (OSX)
11 59 0.35% Opera
12 47 0.28% NextGenSearchBot 1 (for information visit http://www.zoominfo.com/About/misc/NextGenSearchBot.aspx)
19 7 0.04% Firefox 2
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page
Page109
76
78
97
41
9 of
of129
41
108
110
141
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
8 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
24 4 0.02% Who.is Bot
26 2 0.01% Firefox 3
27 2 0.01% Netscape 4.7
28 2 0.01% Programming: URLLIB (Python library)

1 15098 89.34% 1209 57.57% 172657 63.63% United States
2 362 2.14% 358 17.05% 22426 8.27% Ukraine
4 198 1.17% 53 2.52% 6865 2.53% Great Britain (UK)
5 185 1.09% 132 6.29% 13229 4.88% China
6 130 0.77% 97 4.62% 9796 3.61% Germany
7 114 0.67% 43 2.05% 5212 1.92% Israel
8 90 0.53% 82 3.90% 17508 6.45% France
9 69 0.41% 4 0.19% 746 0.27% Switzerland
10 66 0.39% 10 0.48% 2273 0.84% Canada
11 65 0.38% 2 0.10% 621 0.23% Austria
12 64 0.38% 1 0.05% 94 0.03% Czech Republic
13 60 0.36% 2 0.10% 677 0.25% India
14 58 0.34% 1 0.05% 258 0.09% Australia
15 33 0.20% 32 1.52% 3517 1.30% Dominica
17 17 0.10% 12 0.57% 2288 0.84% Italy
18 10 0.06% 6 0.29% 416 0.15% Philippines
19 9 0.05% 7 0.33% 1294 0.48% Romania
20 8 0.05% 6 0.29% 415 0.15% Netherlands
21 5 0.03% 0 0.00% 7 0.00% Ireland
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page110
77
79
98
10of
42 of129
108
110
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
9 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
22 4 0.02% 4 0.19% 318 0.12% Japan
23 4 0.02% 3 0.14% 1089 0.40% Serbia
24 3 0.02% 2 0.10% 123 0.05% Sweden
25 2 0.01% 1 0.05% 62 0.02% Denmark
26 2 0.01% 1 0.05% 62 0.02% Greece
27 2 0.01% 2 0.10% 574 0.21% Thailand
28 2 0.01% 1 0.05% 62 0.02% Anonymous Proxy
29 1 0.01% 1 0.05% 61 0.02% Brazil
30 1 0.01% 1 0.05% 513 0.19% Spain
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page111
78
80
99
11of
43 of129
108
110
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
10 of 10 8/18/2016 2:59 PM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - July 2016 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201607.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: July 2016
Monthly Statistics for July 2016

Total Hits 21516
Total Files 3926
Total Pages 4377
Total Visits 2133
Total KBytes 514193
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 37 96
Code 200 - OK 18.25% 3926
Code 404 - Not Found 80.42% 17304
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page112
100
79
81
12of
44 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
1 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for July 2016

1 348 1.62% 92 2.34% 120 2.74% 74 3.47% 68 5.85% 15020 2.92%
2 335 1.56% 79 2.01% 88 2.01% 61 2.86% 68 5.85% 9139 1.78%
3 339 1.58% 80 2.04% 95 2.17% 74 3.47% 69 5.93% 9864 1.92%
4 338 1.57% 94 2.39% 101 2.31% 80 3.75% 59 5.07% 15301 2.98%
5 464 2.16% 146 3.72% 155 3.54% 84 3.94% 83 7.14% 21329 4.15%
6 512 2.38% 80 2.04% 90 2.06% 76 3.56% 63 5.42% 11559 2.25%
7 410 1.91% 80 2.04% 88 2.01% 64 3.00% 72 6.19% 10426 2.03%
8 816 3.79% 100 2.55% 105 2.40% 90 4.22% 87 7.48% 14678 2.85%
9 422 1.96% 54 1.38% 102 2.33% 48 2.25% 51 4.39% 7663 1.49%
10 178 0.83% 86 2.19% 92 2.10% 54 2.53% 52 4.47% 14645 2.85%
11 239 1.11% 61 1.55% 65 1.49% 49 2.30% 48 4.13% 9335 1.82%
12 526 2.44% 117 2.98% 121 2.76% 58 2.72% 55 4.73% 15960 3.10%
13 373 1.73% 50 1.27% 56 1.28% 47 2.20% 46 3.96% 7260 1.41%
14 963 4.48% 156 3.97% 215 4.91% 107 5.02% 90 7.74% 22414 4.36%
15 1101 5.12% 101 2.57% 137 3.13% 68 3.19% 66 5.67% 13688 2.66%
16 823 3.83% 141 3.59% 182 4.16% 74 3.47% 60 5.16% 19981 3.89%
17 720 3.35% 261 6.65% 277 6.33% 67 3.14% 71 6.10% 32429 6.31%
18 861 4.00% 123 3.13% 132 3.02% 74 3.47% 60 5.16% 15575 3.03%
19 2543 11.82% 127 3.23% 144 3.29% 87 4.08% 64 5.50% 21701 4.22%
20 839 3.90% 116 2.95% 124 2.83% 78 3.66% 96 8.25% 14943 2.91%
21 851 3.96% 241 6.14% 251 5.73% 72 3.38% 63 5.42% 30392 5.91%
22 595 2.77% 249 6.34% 263 6.01% 73 3.42% 62 5.33% 29347 5.71%
23 288 1.34% 169 4.30% 182 4.16% 74 3.47% 56 4.82% 18458 3.59%
24 843 3.92% 235 5.99% 244 5.57% 62 2.91% 56 4.82% 29476 5.73%
25 3000 13.94% 177 4.51% 184 4.20% 77 3.61% 64 5.50% 25010 4.86%
26 486 2.26% 102 2.60% 111 2.54% 56 2.63% 47 4.04% 12005 2.33%
27 820 3.81% 107 2.73% 114 2.60% 76 3.56% 73 6.28% 13800 2.68%
28 359 1.67% 143 3.64% 145 3.31% 59 2.77% 59 5.07% 13459 2.62%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page113
101
80
82
13of
45 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
2 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
29 200 0.93% 84 2.14% 89 2.03% 57 2.67% 47 4.04% 7512 1.46%
30 479 2.23% 182 4.64% 197 4.50% 53 2.48% 47 4.04% 19147 3.72%
31 445 2.07% 93 2.37% 108 2.47% 61 2.86% 62 5.33% 12676 2.47%
Hourly Statistics for July 2016

Hour
0 18 581 2.70% 5 178 4.53% 6 192 4.39% 732 22692 4.41%
1 32 994 4.62% 3 105 2.67% 3 118 2.70% 514 15935 3.10%
2 19 611 2.84% 4 133 3.39% 4 143 3.27% 504 15627 3.04%
3 12 400 1.86% 3 106 2.70% 3 122 2.79% 603 18686 3.63%
4 17 535 2.49% 5 179 4.56% 6 196 4.48% 699 21654 4.21%
5 15 472 2.19% 3 106 2.70% 3 119 2.72% 476 14742 2.87%
6 14 446 2.07% 5 185 4.71% 7 228 5.21% 767 23786 4.63%
7 17 541 2.51% 9 287 7.31% 9 304 6.95% 1224 37948 7.38%
8 11 361 1.68% 4 126 3.21% 4 138 3.15% 477 14797 2.88%
9 21 680 3.16% 5 182 4.64% 7 236 5.39% 686 21255 4.13%
10 11 368 1.71% 7 231 5.88% 8 253 5.78% 787 24400 4.75%
11 16 523 2.43% 7 238 6.06% 8 250 5.71% 963 29841 5.80%
12 33 1026 4.77% 7 217 5.53% 7 236 5.39% 796 24685 4.80%
13 22 687 3.19% 3 115 2.93% 4 137 3.13% 475 14727 2.86%
14 23 740 3.44% 4 126 3.21% 4 136 3.11% 464 14386 2.80%
15 28 875 4.07% 5 158 4.02% 6 188 4.30% 611 18932 3.68%
16 40 1266 5.88% 4 138 3.52% 5 159 3.63% 690 21393 4.16%
17 34 1072 4.98% 3 123 3.13% 4 139 3.18% 506 15696 3.05%
18 39 1213 5.64% 3 98 2.50% 3 107 2.44% 480 14873 2.89%
19 112 3473 16.14% 7 242 6.16% 8 270 6.17% 1149 35623 6.93%
20 40 1261 5.86% 6 188 4.79% 6 208 4.75% 720 22322 4.34%
21 36 1118 5.20% 6 209 5.32% 7 223 5.09% 918 28452 5.53%
22 25 778 3.62% 4 137 3.49% 4 147 3.36% 720 22316 4.34%
23 48 1495 6.95% 3 119 3.03% 4 128 2.92% 627 19426 3.78%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1236 5.74% 74138 14.42% /default.htm
2 311 1.45% 123638 24.05% /gpage30.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page114
102
81
83
14of
46 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
3 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
3 127 0.59% 35906 6.98% /index-2.html
4 85 0.40% 5866 1.14% /gpage13.html
5 83 0.39% 10844 2.11% /gpage41.html
6 81 0.38% 8351 1.62% /gpage24.html
7 79 0.37% 10537 2.05% /gpage19.html
8 79 0.37% 6660 1.30% /gpage26.html
9 79 0.37% 9000 1.75% /gpage28.html
10 77 0.36% 40399 7.86% /gpage22.html
12 74 0.34% 2974 0.58% /gpage12.html
13 71 0.33% 4552 0.89% /gpage1.html
14 70 0.33% 5397 1.05% /gpage2.html
15 67 0.31% 3048 0.59% /gpage39.html
16 66 0.31% 14687 2.86% /gpage17.html
17 66 0.31% 4469 0.87% /gpage38.html
18 65 0.30% 8007 1.56% /gpage20.html
19 64 0.30% 7885 1.53% /gpage8.html
20 64 0.30% 9090 1.77% /gpage9.html
21 63 0.29% 2980 0.58% /gpage34.html
22 62 0.29% 7855 1.53% /gpage33.html
23 61 0.28% 5824 1.13% /gpage21.html
24 61 0.28% 3829 0.74% /gpage23.html
25 60 0.28% 13040 2.54% /gpage16.html
26 60 0.28% 2640 0.51% /gpage25.html
27 60 0.28% 3428 0.67% /gpage3.html
28 60 0.28% 2453 0.48% /gpage7.html
29 57 0.26% 2575 0.50% /gpage32.html
30 56 0.26% 7159 1.39% /gpage10.html
31 56 0.26% 2762 0.54% /gpage29.html
32 55 0.26% 2840 0.55% /gpage31.html
33 54 0.25% 2228 0.43% /gpage36.html
34 53 0.25% 5246 1.02% /gpage18.html
35 53 0.25% 5052 0.98% /gpage27.html
36 52 0.24% 2914 0.57% /gpage37.html
37 51 0.24% 2281 0.44% /gpage6.html
38 50 0.23% 1881 0.37% /gpage15.html
39 50 0.23% 4687 0.91% /gpage5.html
40 46 0.21% 1560 0.30% /gpage40.html
41 44 0.20% 1570 0.31% /gpage14.html
42 42 0.20% 1608 0.31% /gpage4.html
43 41 0.19% 1713 0.33% /gpage11.html
44 32 0.15% 9585 1.86% /

# Hits KBytes URL
1 311 1.45% 123638 24.05% /gpage30.html
2 1236 5.74% 74138 14.42% /default.htm
3 77 0.36% 40399 7.86% /gpage22.html
4 127 0.59% 35906 6.98% /index-2.html
5 66 0.31% 14687 2.86% /gpage17.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page115
103
82
84
15of
47 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
4 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
6 60 0.28% 13040 2.54% /gpage16.html
7 83 0.39% 10844 2.11% /gpage41.html
8 79 0.37% 10537 2.05% /gpage19.html
9 32 0.15% 9585 1.86% /
10 64 0.30% 9090 1.77% /gpage9.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1236 5.74% 899 43.08% /default.htm
2 311 1.45% 255 12.22% /gpage30.html
3 127 0.59% 70 3.35% /index-2.html
4 77 0.36% 45 2.16% /gpage22.html
5 79 0.37% 43 2.06% /gpage28.html
6 74 0.34% 42 2.01% /gpage12.html
7 85 0.40% 38 1.82% /gpage13.html
8 83 0.39% 32 1.53% /gpage41.html
9 71 0.33% 31 1.49% /gpage1.html
10 79 0.37% 29 1.39% /gpage19.html
11 65 0.30% 28 1.34% /gpage20.html
12 66 0.31% 27 1.29% /gpage17.html
13 32 0.15% 26 1.25% /
14 61 0.28% 26 1.25% /gpage21.html
15 70 0.33% 25 1.20% /gpage2.html
16 63 0.29% 25 1.20% /gpage34.html
17 64 0.30% 24 1.15% /gpage9.html
18 60 0.28% 23 1.10% /gpage16.html
19 53 0.25% 23 1.10% /gpage18.html
20 81 0.38% 23 1.10% /gpage24.html
21 79 0.37% 20 0.96% /gpage26.html
22 62 0.29% 20 0.96% /gpage33.html
24 60 0.28% 19 0.91% /gpage3.html
25 55 0.26% 19 0.91% /gpage31.html
26 51 0.24% 18 0.86% /gpage6.html
27 56 0.26% 17 0.81% /gpage10.html
28 44 0.20% 17 0.81% /gpage14.html
29 61 0.28% 17 0.81% /gpage23.html
30 53 0.25% 16 0.77% /gpage27.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1236 5.74% 866 41.55% /default.htm
2 311 1.45% 231 11.08% /gpage30.html
3 127 0.59% 77 3.69% /index-2.html
4 77 0.36% 46 2.21% /gpage22.html
6 85 0.40% 38 1.82% /gpage13.html
7 83 0.39% 38 1.82% /gpage41.html
8 79 0.37% 37 1.78% /gpage28.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page116
104
83
85
16of
48 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
5 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
9 65 0.30% 33 1.58% /gpage20.html
10 79 0.37% 30 1.44% /gpage19.html
11 79 0.37% 30 1.44% /gpage26.html
12 32 0.15% 29 1.39% /
13 64 0.30% 28 1.34% /gpage8.html
14 66 0.31% 27 1.30% /gpage17.html
15 70 0.33% 24 1.15% /gpage2.html

1 1949 9.06% 17 0.43% 4968 0.97% 2 0.09% 63.66.64.246
2 1353 6.29% 14 0.36% 4530 0.88% 2 0.09% 66.173.130.21
3 963 4.48% 12 0.31% 2986 0.58% 2 0.09% 50.152.120.25
4 634 2.95% 11 0.28% 1788 0.35% 3 0.14% 75.146.252.69
5 465 2.16% 7 0.18% 1212 0.24% 1 0.05% 174.54.13.30
6 414 1.92% 4 0.10% 1021 0.20% 1 0.05% 72.25.5.126
7 384 1.78% 5 0.13% 1063 0.21% 1 0.05% 174.54.20.13
8 256 1.19% 2 0.05% 550 0.11% 1 0.05% 50.241.173.121
9 254 1.18% 8 0.20% 1102 0.21% 3 0.14% 199.107.16.122
10 245 1.14% 6 0.15% 994 0.19% 2 0.09% 174.54.200.74
11 221 1.03% 4 0.10% 683 0.13% 1 0.05% 94.163.88.107
12 210 0.98% 201 5.12% 23999 4.67% 5 0.23% 116.18.244.92
13 181 0.84% 3 0.08% 807 0.16% 1 0.05% 96.89.188.41
14 175 0.81% 2 0.05% 1330 0.26% 2 0.09% 80.191.127.224
15 174 0.81% 3 0.08% 783 0.15% 1 0.05% 166.137.102.52
16 172 0.80% 2 0.05% 407 0.08% 1 0.05% 173.163.48.73
17 172 0.80% 1 0.03% 810 0.16% 1 0.05% 45.17.180.15
18 172 0.80% 2 0.05% 1127 0.22% 1 0.05% 73.35.81.189
19 169 0.79% 2 0.05% 461 0.09% 1 0.05% 73.64.156.50
20 169 0.79% 2 0.05% 923 0.18% 2 0.09% 77.75.77.123
21 168 0.78% 2 0.05% 400 0.08% 1 0.05% 174.54.177.47
22 168 0.78% 2 0.05% 924 0.18% 1 0.05% 67.11.12.107
23 168 0.78% 1 0.03% 533 0.10% 1 0.05% 68.81.129.25
24 168 0.78% 2 0.05% 412 0.08% 2 0.09% 73.175.188.91
25 130 0.60% 1 0.03% 739 0.14% 1 0.05% 71.94.196.77
26 125 0.58% 119 3.03% 13773 2.68% 4 0.19% 14.221.229.62
27 120 0.56% 1 0.03% 524 0.10% 1 0.05% 207.34.76.164
28 118 0.55% 4 0.10% 443 0.09% 2 0.09% 136.243.67.139
29 118 0.55% 2 0.05% 1230 0.24% 2 0.09% 64.179.131.156
30 115 0.53% 2 0.05% 388 0.08% 1 0.05% 79.180.143.91
31 108 0.50% 1 0.03% 248 0.05% 1 0.05% 159.45.71.10
32 104 0.48% 1 0.03% 257 0.05% 1 0.05% 215.67.4.67
33 96 0.45% 69 1.76% 8442 1.64% 32 1.50% 141.8.143.136
34 96 0.45% 16 0.41% 5184 1.01% 16 0.75% 74.99.172.251
35 94 0.44% 86 2.19% 9686 1.88% 2 0.09% 5.9.98.130
36 93 0.43% 89 2.27% 9388 1.83% 4 0.19% 119.141.43.168
37 92 0.43% 86 2.19% 10187 1.98% 1 0.05% 149.202.179.115
38 92 0.43% 1 0.03% 673 0.13% 1 0.05% 166.137.125.81
39 90 0.42% 1 0.03% 217 0.04% 1 0.05% 50.192.4.97
40 87 0.40% 83 2.11% 9947 1.93% 2 0.09% 14.222.24.182
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page117
105
84
86
17of
49 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
6 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
41 85 0.40% 83 2.11% 7960 1.55% 3 0.14% 14.221.228.8
42 79 0.37% 33 0.84% 4375 0.85% 19 0.89% 66.249.69.153
43 78 0.36% 1 0.03% 196 0.04% 1 0.05% 98.114.65.170
44 73 0.34% 2 0.05% 649 0.13% 1 0.05% 166.170.5.82
45 73 0.34% 8 0.20% 2166 0.42% 2 0.09% 73.85.200.149
46 70 0.33% 2 0.05% 257 0.05% 1 0.05% 67.130.59.10
47 68 0.32% 1 0.03% 881 0.17% 1 0.05% 68.67.229.226
48 67 0.31% 67 1.71% 17613 3.43% 63 2.95% 195.154.250.39
49 67 0.31% 1 0.03% 273 0.05% 1 0.05% 73.101.138.95
50 67 0.31% 2 0.05% 625 0.12% 1 0.05% 79.66.205.172

1 210 0.98% 201 5.12% 23999 4.67% 5 0.23% 116.18.244.92
2 67 0.31% 67 1.71% 17613 3.43% 63 2.95% 195.154.250.39
3 125 0.58% 119 3.03% 13773 2.68% 4 0.19% 14.221.229.62
4 92 0.43% 86 2.19% 10187 1.98% 1 0.05% 149.202.179.115
5 87 0.40% 83 2.11% 9947 1.93% 2 0.09% 14.222.24.182
6 94 0.44% 86 2.19% 9686 1.88% 2 0.09% 5.9.98.130
7 93 0.43% 89 2.27% 9388 1.83% 4 0.19% 119.141.43.168
8 96 0.45% 69 1.76% 8442 1.64% 32 1.50% 141.8.143.136
9 85 0.40% 83 2.11% 7960 1.55% 3 0.14% 14.221.228.8
10 96 0.45% 16 0.41% 5184 1.01% 16 0.75% 74.99.172.251

# Hits Referrer
3 19 0.09% http://fix-website-errors.com/try.php
7 7 0.03% http://lostfilm-online.ru/
9 7 0.03% http://xn-----6kccaibs5cb8afhjrfmix2n.xn--p1ai/
11 6 0.03% http://djonwatch.ru/
13 6 0.03% http://light.ifmo.ru/
14 6 0.03% http://nizhnevartovsk.xrus.org/
15 6 0.03% http://ulyanovsk.xrus.org/
16 6 0.03% http://www.baidu.com/s
17 6 0.03% http://xn-----7kceclhb4abre1b4a0ccl2fxch1a.xn--p1ai/
18 6 0.03% http://yaroslavl.xrus.org/
19 5 0.02% http://berlininsl.com/
20 5 0.02% http://itbc.kiev.ua/
21 5 0.02% http://letous.ru/
22 5 0.02% http://mmog-play.ru/
23 5 0.02% http://most-kerch.org/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page118
106
85
87
18of
50 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
7 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
25 5 0.02% http://tuapse.xrus.org/
26 5 0.02% http://www.bookmaker-bet.com/
27 5 0.02% http://www.ctm-stroy.ru/
28 5 0.02% http://www.styro.ru/
30 4 0.02% http://anapa.xrus.org/
31 4 0.02% http://damaglamura.com/
33 4 0.02% http://remontgruzovik.ru/
34 3 0.01% http://archidom.info/
35 3 0.01% http://ayakino.net/
36 3 0.01% http://azartmix.com/
37 3 0.01% http://esk-sambist.ru/
38 3 0.01% http://film-one.ru/
39 3 0.01% http://finteks.ru/
40 3 0.01% http://gelendzhik.xrus.org/
41 3 0.01% http://generic-pills-online.com/
42 3 0.01% http://igrovyeavtomaty777.ru/
43 3 0.01% http://ingress-store.com/
44 3 0.01% http://interiordesignpics.com/
45 3 0.01% http://ivanovo.xrus.org/
46 3 0.01% http://izoll.ru/
47 3 0.01% http://khabarovsk.xrus.org/
48 3 0.01% http://kw21.org/
49 3 0.01% http://nefteyugansk.xrus.org/
50 3 0.01% http://prepodka.net/

11 33.33% attorney roy shirk lancaster pa
21 33.33% compared to prototypical hallucinogens dissociatives have stronger effects of __________.
31 33.33% joseph roda global technologies

# Hits User Agent
1 10987 51.06% Safari (OSX)
4 717 3.33% Opera
10 79 0.37% Firefox 3
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page119
107
86
88
19of
51 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
8 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
18 11 0.05% Twitterbot/1.0
20 9 0.04% Firefox 2
21 9 0.04% Mechanize/2.7.3 Ruby/1.9.3p551 (http://github.com/sparklemotion/mechanize/)
22 7 0.03% PrivateSearch/0.1.0 (Polite Nutch Crawler; grierforensics.com)
25 4 0.02% Netscape 4.7
27 3 0.01% Spider: Netcraft Web Survey
28 3 0.01% Wotbox/2.01 (+http://www.wotbox.com/bot/)
29 3 0.01% spiderman
30 2 0.01% AHC/2.0

1 15315 71.18% 1631 41.54% 222529 43.28% United States
2 1033 4.80% 868 22.11% 94476 18.37% China
3 677 3.15% 14 0.36% 2012 0.39% Brazil
4 603 2.80% 369 9.40% 41459 8.06% Germany
5 362 1.68% 6 0.15% 1431 0.28% Czech Republic
6 329 1.53% 308 7.85% 21056 4.10% Ukraine
9 304 1.41% 23 0.59% 3369 0.66% Italy
10 303 1.41% 10 0.25% 3697 0.72% Canada
11 293 1.36% 79 2.01% 9149 1.78% Great Britain (UK)
12 234 1.09% 7 0.18% 1734 0.34% Israel
13 207 0.96% 146 3.72% 30713 5.97% France
14 187 0.87% 4 0.10% 1560 0.30% Australia
15 176 0.82% 3 0.08% 1843 0.36% Iran
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page120
108
87
89
20of
52 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
9 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
16 133 0.62% 10 0.25% 2263 0.44% Netherlands
17 81 0.38% 24 0.61% 5748 1.12% Romania
18 77 0.36% 2 0.05% 253 0.05% Bangladesh
19 66 0.31% 63 1.60% 7484 1.46% Dominica
20 64 0.30% 3 0.08% 1194 0.23% India
21 62 0.29% 6 0.15% 1584 0.31% Hong Kong
22 61 0.28% 1 0.03% 618 0.12% Panama
23 58 0.27% 3 0.08% 278 0.05% Mexico
24 58 0.27% 1 0.03% 161 0.03% Turkey
25 56 0.26% 1 0.03% 860 0.17% Singapore
26 56 0.26% 1 0.03% 157 0.03% Venezuela
27 12 0.06% 4 0.10% 305 0.06% Ireland
28 7 0.03% 5 0.13% 1463 0.28% Bulgaria
29 6 0.03% 6 0.15% 2578 0.50% South Africa
30 5 0.02% 5 0.13% 1661 0.32% Japan
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page121
109
88
90
21of
53 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
10 of 10 8/18/2016 3:00 PM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - June 2016 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201606.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: June 2016
Generated 01-Jul-2016 05:27 GMT
Monthly Statistics for June 2016

Total Hits 23141
Total Files 3349
Total Pages 3568
Total Visits 1967
Total KBytes 445134
. Avg Max
Code 200 - OK 14.47% 3349
Code 404 - Not Found 85.01% 19672
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page122
110
89
91
22of
54 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
1 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for June 2016

1 1203 5.20% 139 4.15% 142 3.98% 65 3.30% 71 6.18% 21542 4.84%
2 1810 7.82% 180 5.37% 191 5.35% 97 4.93% 102 8.89% 25290 5.68%
3 378 1.63% 64 1.91% 72 2.02% 48 2.44% 57 4.97% 7062 1.59%
4 419 1.81% 61 1.82% 66 1.85% 49 2.49% 55 4.79% 8502 1.91%
5 1300 5.62% 97 2.90% 102 2.86% 55 2.80% 67 5.84% 12963 2.91%
6 283 1.22% 136 4.06% 141 3.95% 62 3.15% 62 5.40% 15918 3.58%
7 295 1.27% 57 1.70% 63 1.77% 44 2.24% 52 4.53% 5602 1.26%
8 495 2.14% 81 2.42% 84 2.35% 59 3.00% 55 4.79% 10331 2.32%
9 388 1.68% 76 2.27% 80 2.24% 61 3.10% 53 4.62% 10065 2.26%
10 547 2.36% 120 3.58% 126 3.53% 80 4.07% 73 6.36% 17221 3.87%
11 793 3.43% 92 2.75% 94 2.63% 63 3.20% 70 6.10% 13676 3.07%
12 317 1.37% 108 3.22% 113 3.17% 45 2.29% 45 3.92% 11172 2.51%
13 566 2.45% 186 5.55% 194 5.44% 78 3.97% 77 6.71% 20968 4.71%
14 353 1.53% 106 3.17% 119 3.34% 70 3.56% 67 5.84% 12872 2.89%
15 933 4.03% 79 2.36% 87 2.44% 50 2.54% 53 4.62% 10230 2.30%
16 606 2.62% 183 5.46% 202 5.66% 79 4.02% 65 5.66% 23749 5.34%
17 419 1.81% 86 2.57% 87 2.44% 67 3.41% 64 5.57% 11197 2.52%
18 669 2.89% 133 3.97% 138 3.87% 63 3.20% 55 4.79% 17955 4.03%
19 440 1.90% 103 3.08% 105 2.94% 50 2.54% 55 4.79% 13480 3.03%
20 793 3.43% 93 2.78% 93 2.61% 60 3.05% 64 5.57% 13221 2.97%
21 1017 4.39% 116 3.46% 124 3.48% 77 3.91% 70 6.10% 17812 4.00%
22 3107 13.43% 174 5.20% 203 5.69% 114 5.80% 83 7.23% 29077 6.53%
23 1578 6.82% 160 4.78% 173 4.85% 72 3.66% 60 5.23% 24024 5.40%
24 649 2.80% 96 2.87% 99 2.77% 67 3.41% 61 5.31% 12103 2.72%
25 743 3.21% 146 4.36% 153 4.29% 61 3.10% 62 5.40% 15520 3.49%
26 648 2.80% 76 2.27% 82 2.30% 62 3.15% 79 6.88% 13381 3.01%
27 293 1.27% 77 2.30% 79 2.21% 57 2.90% 56 4.88% 11017 2.47%
28 825 3.57% 118 3.52% 125 3.50% 72 3.66% 79 6.88% 14792 3.32%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page123
111
90
92
23of
55 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
2 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
29 739 3.19% 135 4.03% 141 3.95% 81 4.12% 84 7.32% 15220 3.42%
30 535 2.31% 71 2.12% 90 2.52% 61 3.10% 64 5.57% 9174 2.06%
Hourly Statistics for June 2016

Hour
0 54 1623 7.01% 4 142 4.24% 5 152 4.26% 772 23157 5.20%
1 44 1323 5.72% 7 233 6.96% 8 247 6.92% 1000 30001 6.74%
2 40 1224 5.29% 5 151 4.51% 5 163 4.57% 730 21899 4.92%
3 26 796 3.44% 3 107 3.19% 3 113 3.17% 499 14977 3.36%
4 15 463 2.00% 3 102 3.05% 3 102 2.86% 510 15295 3.44%
5 18 558 2.41% 5 165 4.93% 5 168 4.71% 656 19665 4.42%
6 17 532 2.30% 2 83 2.48% 2 89 2.49% 422 12674 2.85%
7 32 966 4.17% 5 174 5.20% 6 190 5.33% 706 21177 4.76%
8 10 318 1.37% 4 125 3.73% 4 133 3.73% 635 19042 4.28%
9 17 522 2.26% 4 146 4.36% 5 153 4.29% 510 15291 3.44%
10 19 573 2.48% 4 136 4.06% 4 143 4.01% 598 17941 4.03%
11 11 356 1.54% 3 114 3.40% 4 121 3.39% 401 12015 2.70%
12 17 523 2.26% 5 169 5.05% 5 179 5.02% 532 15974 3.59%
13 38 1159 5.01% 4 141 4.21% 4 144 4.04% 646 19378 4.35%
14 84 2548 11.01% 5 159 4.75% 5 168 4.71% 855 25638 5.76%
15 21 656 2.83% 3 113 3.37% 4 121 3.39% 507 15222 3.42%
16 36 1101 4.76% 3 119 3.55% 4 125 3.50% 613 18376 4.13%
17 24 744 3.22% 4 122 3.64% 4 131 3.67% 506 15173 3.41%
18 23 712 3.08% 4 140 4.18% 4 147 4.12% 566 16970 3.81%
19 56 1681 7.26% 5 154 4.60% 5 177 4.96% 793 23796 5.35%
20 54 1641 7.09% 5 158 4.72% 5 170 4.76% 678 20337 4.57%
21 16 488 2.11% 3 116 3.46% 3 119 3.34% 446 13379 3.01%
22 18 557 2.41% 4 122 3.64% 4 136 3.81% 515 15459 3.47%
23 69 2077 8.98% 5 158 4.72% 5 177 4.96% 743 22298 5.01%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1298 5.61% 78444 17.62% /default.htm
2 267 1.15% 113325 25.46% /gpage30.html
3 95 0.41% 29125 6.54% /index-2.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page124
112
91
93
24of
56 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
3 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
4 75 0.32% 3631 0.82% /gpage34.html
5 64 0.28% 7484 1.68% /gpage28.html
6 64 0.28% 9579 2.15% /gpage41.html
8 63 0.27% 31240 7.02% /gpage22.html
9 58 0.25% 3305 0.74% /gpage3.html
10 53 0.23% 3952 0.89% /gpage13.html
11 52 0.22% 12481 2.80% /gpage17.html
12 52 0.22% 7138 1.60% /gpage33.html
13 51 0.22% 2154 0.48% /gpage12.html
14 51 0.22% 4502 1.01% /gpage26.html
15 50 0.22% 5494 1.23% /gpage24.html
16 48 0.21% 3819 0.86% /gpage2.html
17 48 0.21% 5053 1.14% /gpage27.html
18 47 0.20% 3172 0.71% /gpage1.html
19 47 0.20% 2787 0.63% /gpage37.html
20 46 0.20% 3255 0.73% /gpage38.html
21 45 0.19% 10093 2.27% /gpage16.html
22 45 0.19% 2469 0.55% /gpage29.html
23 45 0.19% 6783 1.52% /gpage9.html
24 44 0.19% 1984 0.45% /gpage39.html
25 42 0.18% 5405 1.21% /gpage10.html
26 42 0.18% 4341 0.98% /gpage21.html
27 40 0.17% 5174 1.16% /gpage19.html
28 39 0.17% 4981 1.12% /gpage20.html
29 39 0.17% 2158 0.48% /gpage31.html
30 39 0.17% 1664 0.37% /gpage7.html
31 39 0.17% 4966 1.12% /gpage8.html
32 36 0.16% 2351 0.53% /gpage23.html
33 36 0.16% 1471 0.33% /gpage36.html
34 35 0.15% 10781 2.42% /
35 34 0.15% 1535 0.34% /gpage32.html
36 34 0.15% 1225 0.28% /gpage40.html
37 33 0.14% 1287 0.29% /gpage14.html
38 33 0.14% 1488 0.33% /gpage25.html
39 31 0.13% 1227 0.28% /gpage15.html
40 30 0.13% 1407 0.32% /gpage6.html
41 28 0.12% 1130 0.25% /gpage4.html
42 27 0.12% 1223 0.27% /gpage11.html
43 25 0.11% 2567 0.58% /gpage18.html
44 23 0.10% 2291 0.51% /gpage5.html
45 1 0.00% 0 0.00% /.html

# Hits KBytes URL
1 267 1.15% 113325 25.46% /gpage30.html
2 1298 5.61% 78444 17.62% /default.htm
3 63 0.27% 31240 7.02% /gpage22.html
4 95 0.41% 29125 6.54% /index-2.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page125
113
92
94
25of
57 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
4 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
5 52 0.22% 12481 2.80% /gpage17.html
6 35 0.15% 10781 2.42% /
7 45 0.19% 10093 2.27% /gpage16.html
8 64 0.28% 9579 2.15% /gpage41.html
9 64 0.28% 7484 1.68% /gpage28.html
10 52 0.22% 7138 1.60% /gpage33.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1298 5.61% 900 46.73% /default.htm
2 267 1.15% 225 11.68% /gpage30.html
3 95 0.41% 53 2.75% /index-2.html
4 75 0.32% 39 2.02% /gpage34.html
5 63 0.27% 35 1.82% /gpage22.html
6 64 0.28% 33 1.71% /gpage28.html
7 58 0.25% 33 1.71% /gpage3.html
8 35 0.15% 29 1.51% /
9 53 0.23% 28 1.45% /gpage13.html
10 47 0.20% 27 1.40% /gpage1.html
11 51 0.22% 27 1.40% /gpage12.html
12 45 0.19% 25 1.30% /gpage16.html
13 48 0.21% 25 1.30% /gpage2.html
14 52 0.22% 23 1.19% /gpage17.html
15 40 0.17% 21 1.09% /gpage19.html
16 47 0.20% 21 1.09% /gpage37.html
17 45 0.19% 21 1.09% /gpage9.html
18 64 0.28% 20 1.04% /gpage41.html
19 42 0.18% 17 0.88% /gpage21.html
20 50 0.22% 17 0.88% /gpage24.html
21 51 0.22% 17 0.88% /gpage26.html
22 48 0.21% 17 0.88% /gpage27.html
23 45 0.19% 17 0.88% /gpage29.html
24 33 0.14% 16 0.83% /gpage14.html
25 39 0.17% 16 0.83% /gpage20.html
26 36 0.16% 16 0.83% /gpage23.html
27 46 0.20% 16 0.83% /gpage38.html
28 34 0.15% 15 0.78% /gpage40.html
29 42 0.18% 14 0.73% /gpage10.html
30 34 0.15% 14 0.73% /gpage32.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1298 5.61% 859 44.90% /default.htm
2 267 1.15% 192 10.04% /gpage30.html
3 95 0.41% 64 3.35% /index-2.html
5 63 0.27% 42 2.20% /gpage22.html
6 75 0.32% 40 2.09% /gpage34.html
7 64 0.28% 34 1.78% /gpage41.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page126
114
93
95
26of
58 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
5 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
8 58 0.25% 32 1.67% /gpage3.html
9 35 0.15% 30 1.57% /
10 64 0.28% 30 1.57% /gpage28.html
11 51 0.22% 27 1.41% /gpage26.html
12 45 0.19% 26 1.36% /gpage16.html
13 53 0.23% 23 1.20% /gpage13.html
14 52 0.22% 22 1.15% /gpage17.html
15 45 0.19% 22 1.15% /gpage9.html

1 1341 5.79% 32 0.96% 7028 1.58% 2 0.10% 40.131.1.234
2 863 3.73% 9 0.27% 2302 0.52% 1 0.05% 166.216.165.119
3 629 2.72% 8 0.24% 1705 0.38% 2 0.10% 23.30.210.105
4 627 2.71% 6 0.18% 1469 0.33% 1 0.05% 73.79.235.48
5 618 2.67% 9 0.27% 1753 0.39% 1 0.05% 174.59.202.28
6 426 1.84% 1 0.03% 1060 0.24% 1 0.05% 108.15.255.2
7 418 1.81% 5 0.15% 1202 0.27% 2 0.10% 63.66.64.246
8 377 1.63% 3 0.09% 1083 0.24% 1 0.05% 24.131.192.230
9 350 1.51% 4 0.12% 1009 0.23% 2 0.10% 71.254.114.79
10 328 1.42% 3 0.09% 1709 0.38% 1 0.05% 63.66.64.247
11 306 1.32% 9 0.27% 1377 0.31% 1 0.05% 66.87.80.110
12 303 1.31% 1 0.03% 590 0.13% 1 0.05% 72.25.5.126
13 301 1.30% 23 0.69% 7198 1.62% 20 1.02% 74.99.172.251
14 286 1.24% 5 0.15% 804 0.18% 3 0.15% 174.54.201.50
15 271 1.17% 3 0.09% 906 0.20% 2 0.10% 173.163.77.213
16 215 0.93% 3 0.09% 550 0.12% 1 0.05% 73.195.104.165
17 175 0.76% 3 0.09% 741 0.17% 1 0.05% 166.216.165.64
18 174 0.75% 3 0.09% 787 0.18% 1 0.05% 50.143.185.121
19 172 0.74% 1 0.03% 354 0.08% 1 0.05% 73.64.168.61
20 171 0.74% 3 0.09% 672 0.15% 2 0.10% 73.130.227.233
21 171 0.74% 2 0.06% 842 0.19% 1 0.05% 91.222.118.139
22 168 0.73% 3 0.09% 780 0.18% 1 0.05% 113.199.250.159
23 167 0.72% 2 0.06% 431 0.10% 1 0.05% 50.152.119.110
24 161 0.70% 1 0.03% 342 0.08% 1 0.05% 195.154.172.59
25 157 0.68% 0 0.00% 275 0.06% 0 0.00% 65.55.210.8
26 147 0.64% 3 0.09% 639 0.14% 1 0.05% 70.138.212.62
27 146 0.63% 4 0.12% 454 0.10% 1 0.05% 74.92.121.113
28 138 0.60% 52 1.55% 4494 1.01% 44 2.24% 52.3.127.144
29 123 0.53% 2 0.06% 327 0.07% 1 0.05% 70.15.106.37
30 122 0.53% 1 0.03% 273 0.06% 1 0.05% 23.31.247.154
31 120 0.52% 4 0.12% 658 0.15% 1 0.05% 172.56.31.184
32 118 0.51% 2 0.06% 422 0.09% 2 0.10% 173.167.61.61
33 117 0.51% 1 0.03% 717 0.16% 1 0.05% 107.209.164.69
34 117 0.51% 1 0.03% 715 0.16% 1 0.05% 23.24.185.85
35 116 0.50% 2 0.06% 321 0.07% 2 0.10% 12.159.160.146
36 116 0.50% 2 0.06% 395 0.09% 1 0.05% 73.153.80.146
37 115 0.50% 2 0.06% 342 0.08% 1 0.05% 174.54.20.13
38 113 0.49% 2 0.06% 413 0.09% 1 0.05% 50.164.119.173
39 112 0.48% 2 0.06% 301 0.07% 2 0.10% 72.193.165.6
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page127
115
94
96
27of
59 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
6 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
40 111 0.48% 1 0.03% 706 0.16% 1 0.05% 173.169.86.18
41 111 0.48% 1 0.03% 342 0.08% 1 0.05% 73.52.56.97
42 111 0.48% 3 0.09% 446 0.10% 1 0.05% 93.169.214.250
43 110 0.48% 1 0.03% 267 0.06% 1 0.05% 105.184.32.240
44 109 0.47% 1 0.03% 266 0.06% 1 0.05% 120.17.97.49
45 103 0.45% 58 1.73% 4993 1.12% 44 2.24% 17.142.154.222
46 103 0.45% 45 1.34% 5312 1.19% 1 0.05% 54.93.70.0
47 101 0.44% 2 0.06% 596 0.13% 1 0.05% 209.50.153.226
48 99 0.43% 1 0.03% 232 0.05% 1 0.05% 174.59.197.34
49 94 0.41% 86 2.57% 10318 2.32% 2 0.10% 5.9.98.130
50 84 0.36% 2 0.06% 424 0.10% 1 0.05% 166.137.90.50

1 58 0.25% 58 1.73% 14786 3.32% 56 2.85% 195.154.250.39
2 94 0.41% 86 2.57% 10318 2.32% 2 0.10% 5.9.98.130
3 68 0.29% 63 1.88% 9015 2.03% 1 0.05% 72.76.243.86
4 301 1.30% 23 0.69% 7198 1.62% 20 1.02% 74.99.172.251
5 1341 5.79% 32 0.96% 7028 1.58% 2 0.10% 40.131.1.234
6 50 0.22% 48 1.43% 5740 1.29% 1 0.05% 142.4.216.172
7 103 0.45% 45 1.34% 5312 1.19% 1 0.05% 54.93.70.0
8 46 0.20% 45 1.34% 5280 1.19% 1 0.05% 52.51.50.127
9 50 0.22% 43 1.28% 5100 1.15% 9 0.46% 68.180.229.126
10 43 0.19% 40 1.19% 5018 1.13% 2 0.10% 208.43.225.85

# Hits Referrer
3 48 0.21% http://fix-website-errors.com/try.php
6 15 0.06% http://e-collantes.com/
7 14 0.06% http://uytmaster.ru/
9 12 0.05% http://woman-orgasm.ru/
10 11 0.05% http://avtocredit-legko.ru/
11 11 0.05% http://www.varikozdok.ru/
12 11 0.05% https://ebin.cc/
13 10 0.04% http://fm-upgrade.ru/
14 10 0.04% http://free-video-tool.com/
15 9 0.04% http://linerdrilling.com/
16 9 0.04% http://storinka.com.ua/
17 9 0.04% http://tadalafil-sildenafil.com/
18 9 0.04% http://www.alveris.ru/
19 9 0.04% http://www.vesnatehno.ru/
20 8 0.03% http://accessories.afora.ru/
21 8 0.03% http://finteks.ru/
22 8 0.03% http://m.facebook.com/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page128
116
95
97
28of
60 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
7 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
23 8 0.03% http://mmog-play.ru/
24 8 0.03% http://znaniyapolza.ru/
25 8 0.03% https://td-33.ru/
26 7 0.03% http://buttons-for-website.com
27 7 0.03% http://letolove.ru/
28 7 0.03% http://zaim-pod-zalog-krasnodar.ru/
29 6 0.03% http://djonwatch.ru/
30 6 0.03% http://dneprsvet.com.ua/
31 6 0.03% http://flooringinstallation-edmonton.com/
32 6 0.03% http://royal-investments.net/
33 6 0.03% http://runovschool.ua/
34 6 0.03% http://runstocks.com/
35 6 0.03% http://sad-torg.com.ua/
36 6 0.03% http://solitaire-game.ru/
37 6 0.03% http://tires.afora.ru/
38 6 0.03% http://to.afora.ru/
39 6 0.03% http://touropia.ru/
40 6 0.03% http://www.allmetalworking.ru/
41 6 0.03% http://www.pornoklad.net/
42 6 0.03% http://zastenchivosti.net/
45 5 0.02% http://bankrot-spb.ru/
46 5 0.02% http://https-legalrc.biz/
47 5 0.02% http://keywords-monitoring-success.com/try.php
48 5 0.02% http://kupit-adenu.ru/

1 2 40.00% cache:giqkvjnnizkj:www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/index-2.html
2 1 20.00% shtan caterbone allstate homeowners claim lancaster pa.
3 1 20.00% stan caterbone lancaster pa
4 1 20.00% tom's project hope

# Hits User Agent
1 13895 60.04% Safari (OSX)
8 138 0.60% ltx71 - (http://ltx71.com/)
9 129 0.56% Opera
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page129
117
96
98
29of
61 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
8 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
15 27 0.12% Twitterbot/1.0
22 9 0.04% Firefox 3
23 8 0.03% Netscape 4.7
24 5 0.02% spiderman
25 4 0.02% Agent
28 3 0.01% BOT/0.1 (BOT for JCE)
29 3 0.01% MetaCommentBot; http://metacomment.io/about
30 3 0.01% Programming: Wget library (http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/wget.html)

1 16222 70.10% 1742 52.02% 251550 56.51% United States
2 1912 8.26% 46 1.37% 7026 1.58% Brazil
3 565 2.44% 497 14.84% 32068 7.20% Ukraine
4 457 1.97% 307 9.17% 34483 7.75% Germany
5 410 1.77% 195 5.82% 33093 7.43% France
6 396 1.71% 275 8.21% 27015 6.07% China
7 333 1.44% 1 0.03% 603 0.14% Czech Republic
8 285 1.23% 7 0.21% 1046 0.24% Italy
9 228 0.99% 3 0.09% 1045 0.23% Australia
10 192 0.83% 42 1.25% 6882 1.55% Great Britain (UK)
11 172 0.74% 3 0.09% 1157 0.26% Poland
12 171 0.74% 3 0.09% 477 0.11% Philippines
13 170 0.73% 4 0.12% 534 0.12% Portugal
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page130
118
97
99
30of
62 of110
108
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
9 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
14 168 0.73% 3 0.09% 780 0.18% Nepal
15 168 0.73% 2 0.06% 443 0.10% South Africa
16 146 0.63% 74 2.21% 8876 1.99% Canada
17 120 0.52% 7 0.21% 2026 0.46% India
18 116 0.50% 6 0.18% 960 0.22% Mexico
19 113 0.49% 2 0.06% 316 0.07% Thailand
20 111 0.48% 3 0.09% 446 0.10% Saudi Arabia
21 101 0.44% 51 1.52% 6281 1.41% Ireland
22 84 0.36% 2 0.06% 718 0.16% Chile
23 70 0.30% 2 0.06% 241 0.05% Angola
24 69 0.30% 3 0.09% 810 0.18% Malaysia
25 59 0.25% 1 0.03% 615 0.14% Argentina
26 58 0.25% 3 0.09% 698 0.16% Luxembourg
27 57 0.25% 1 0.03% 159 0.04% Mauritius
28 55 0.24% 1 0.03% 155 0.03% Jordan
29 28 0.12% 28 0.84% 5404 1.21% Romania
30 17 0.07% 10 0.30% 3540 0.80% Indonesia
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page131
100
119
98
31of
63 of108
110
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
10 of 10 8/18/2016 3:02 PM
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com - May 2016 http://stats.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/usage_201605.html
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016

Summary Period: May 2016
Generated 01-Jun-2016 05:24 GMT
Monthly Statistics for May 2016

Total Hits 27639
Total Files 3587
Total Pages 3978
Total Visits 2125
Total KBytes 476902
. Avg Max
Sites per Day 39 91
Undefined response code 0.03% 9
Code 200 - OK 12.98% 3587
Code 404 - Not Found 85.85% 23727
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page
Page132
101
120
99
32of
64 of108
110
129
141
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
1 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
Daily Statistics for May 2016

1 513 1.86% 128 3.57% 131 3.29% 52 2.45% 49 3.98% 15488 3.25%
2 538 1.95% 111 3.09% 114 2.87% 52 2.45% 54 4.39% 15972 3.35%
3 839 3.04% 92 2.56% 92 2.31% 65 3.06% 91 7.40% 16094 3.37%
4 686 2.48% 84 2.34% 84 2.11% 51 2.40% 53 4.31% 9654 2.02%
5 448 1.62% 81 2.26% 83 2.09% 61 2.87% 57 4.63% 12814 2.69%
6 897 3.25% 190 5.30% 196 4.93% 73 3.44% 69 5.61% 25593 5.37%
7 838 3.03% 229 6.38% 236 5.93% 91 4.28% 85 6.91% 18569 3.89%
8 619 2.24% 65 1.81% 75 1.89% 60 2.82% 61 4.96% 9469 1.99%
9 829 3.00% 87 2.43% 94 2.36% 67 3.15% 75 6.10% 12651 2.65%
10 3264 11.81% 131 3.65% 146 3.67% 80 3.76% 69 5.61% 21827 4.58%
11 2812 10.17% 109 3.04% 119 2.99% 78 3.67% 77 6.26% 19730 4.14%
12 1369 4.95% 86 2.40% 89 2.24% 63 2.96% 59 4.80% 10758 2.26%
13 935 3.38% 103 2.87% 115 2.89% 68 3.20% 72 5.85% 14342 3.01%
14 426 1.54% 51 1.42% 76 1.91% 47 2.21% 50 4.07% 8571 1.80%
15 325 1.18% 105 2.93% 113 2.84% 77 3.62% 64 5.20% 12973 2.72%
16 592 2.14% 160 4.46% 167 4.20% 67 3.15% 70 5.69% 19488 4.09%
17 493 1.78% 144 4.01% 168 4.22% 75 3.53% 77 6.26% 15949 3.34%
18 806 2.92% 117 3.26% 129 3.24% 53 2.49% 57 4.63% 15295 3.21%
19 914 3.31% 75 2.09% 85 2.14% 57 2.68% 58 4.72% 11099 2.33%
20 1108 4.01% 140 3.90% 165 4.15% 85 4.00% 70 5.69% 21320 4.47%
21 938 3.39% 198 5.52% 322 8.09% 100 4.71% 61 4.96% 23600 4.95%
22 601 2.17% 99 2.76% 125 3.14% 73 3.44% 76 6.18% 14409 3.02%
23 1180 4.27% 110 3.07% 118 2.97% 91 4.28% 91 7.40% 14984 3.14%
24 653 2.36% 103 2.87% 107 2.69% 69 3.25% 64 5.20% 15627 3.28%
25 716 2.59% 141 3.93% 147 3.70% 76 3.58% 72 5.85% 20446 4.29%
26 1078 3.90% 92 2.56% 106 2.66% 80 3.76% 69 5.61% 13996 2.93%
27 945 3.42% 143 3.99% 147 3.70% 77 3.62% 61 4.96% 15792 3.31%
28 622 2.25% 137 3.82% 141 3.54% 58 2.73% 63 5.12% 18535 3.89%
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page133
100
102
121
33 of 141
65 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
2 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
29 368 1.33% 58 1.62% 59 1.48% 39 1.84% 38 3.09% 7345 1.54%
30 528 1.91% 101 2.82% 104 2.61% 77 3.62% 61 4.96% 9829 2.06%
31 759 2.75% 117 3.26% 125 3.14% 64 3.01% 60 4.88% 14681 3.08%
Hourly Statistics for May 2016

Hour
0 37 1156 4.18% 4 143 3.99% 5 158 3.97% 704 21824 4.58%
1 34 1082 3.91% 5 156 4.35% 5 175 4.40% 648 20101 4.21%
2 19 613 2.22% 5 159 4.43% 5 182 4.58% 686 21267 4.46%
3 27 838 3.03% 4 128 3.57% 4 153 3.85% 555 17200 3.61%
4 13 415 1.50% 2 81 2.26% 2 87 2.19% 261 8078 1.69%
5 20 628 2.27% 3 104 2.90% 3 112 2.82% 485 15032 3.15%
6 11 360 1.30% 3 98 2.73% 3 102 2.56% 420 13023 2.73%
7 25 788 2.85% 3 107 2.98% 3 116 2.92% 528 16354 3.43%
8 12 378 1.37% 2 81 2.26% 2 89 2.24% 333 10309 2.16%
9 21 672 2.43% 2 70 1.95% 2 75 1.89% 327 10131 2.12%
10 23 735 2.66% 4 150 4.18% 6 188 4.73% 606 18789 3.94%
11 41 1276 4.62% 4 142 3.96% 4 149 3.75% 630 19531 4.10%
12 38 1192 4.31% 6 209 5.83% 7 233 5.86% 802 24858 5.21%
13 38 1207 4.37% 8 250 6.97% 8 261 6.56% 1077 33382 7.00%
14 96 2987 10.81% 6 199 5.55% 7 222 5.58% 940 29142 6.11%
15 45 1423 5.15% 3 118 3.29% 4 134 3.37% 638 19771 4.15%
16 60 1883 6.81% 8 272 7.58% 9 307 7.72% 838 25964 5.44%
17 51 1584 5.73% 5 170 4.74% 6 188 4.73% 662 20513 4.30%
18 33 1035 3.74% 4 131 3.65% 4 139 3.49% 585 18122 3.80%
19 29 910 3.29% 3 104 2.90% 3 116 2.92% 500 15511 3.25%
20 72 2244 8.12% 6 193 5.38% 7 219 5.51% 824 25557 5.36%
21 52 1623 5.87% 5 180 5.02% 6 194 4.88% 776 24070 5.05%
22 61 1910 6.91% 7 235 6.55% 8 258 6.49% 1140 35351 7.41%
23 22 700 2.53% 3 107 2.98% 3 121 3.04% 420 13020 2.73%

# Hits KBytes URL
1 1322 4.78% 77791 16.31% /default.htm
2 272 0.98% 110832 23.24% /gpage30.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page134
101
103
122
34 of 141
66 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
3 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
3 104 0.38% 11495 2.41% /gpage28.html
4 97 0.35% 47179 9.89% /gpage22.html
5 81 0.29% 10913 2.29% /gpage41.html
6 76 0.27% 17368 3.64% /gpage17.html
7 68 0.25% 20307 4.26% /index-2.html
8 67 0.24% 6339 1.33% /gpage27.html
9 65 0.24% 8685 1.82% /gpage19.html
10 60 0.22% 2187 0.46% /gpage12.html
11 60 0.22% 3888 0.82% /gpage13.html
12 60 0.22% 4318 0.91% /gpage2.html
13 59 0.21% 5189 1.09% /gpage21.html
14 57 0.21% 6514 1.37% /gpage10.html
15 57 0.21% 2941 0.62% /gpage3.html
16 56 0.20% 2968 0.62% /gpage1.html
17 56 0.20% 2016 0.42% /gpage7.html
18 55 0.20% 2547 0.53% /gpage34.html
20 54 0.20% 6360 1.33% /gpage20.html
21 54 0.20% 6164 1.29% /gpage8.html
22 52 0.19% 3934 0.82% /gpage26.html
23 51 0.18% 4726 0.99% /gpage24.html
24 51 0.18% 3333 0.70% /gpage38.html
25 49 0.18% 10157 2.13% /gpage16.html
26 49 0.18% 1958 0.41% /gpage25.html
27 47 0.17% 13619 2.86% /
28 47 0.17% 2154 0.45% /gpage31.html
29 47 0.17% 5375 1.13% /gpage33.html
30 47 0.17% 6436 1.35% /gpage9.html
31 46 0.17% 2535 0.53% /gpage37.html
32 45 0.16% 2687 0.56% /gpage23.html
33 44 0.16% 1450 0.30% /gpage14.html
34 44 0.16% 1989 0.42% /gpage29.html
35 44 0.16% 1883 0.39% /gpage32.html
36 43 0.16% 1762 0.37% /gpage11.html
37 43 0.16% 1190 0.25% /gpage40.html
38 41 0.15% 3542 0.74% /gpage5.html
39 40 0.14% 1603 0.34% /gpage6.html
40 39 0.14% 1646 0.35% /gpage39.html
41 38 0.14% 1338 0.28% /gpage36.html
42 38 0.14% 1261 0.26% /gpage4.html
43 35 0.13% 3015 0.63% /gpage18.html
44 33 0.12% 1146 0.24% /gpage15.html
45 8 0.03% 0 0.00% /.html

# Hits KBytes URL
1 272 0.98% 110832 23.24% /gpage30.html
2 1322 4.78% 77791 16.31% /default.htm
3 97 0.35% 47179 9.89% /gpage22.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page135
102
104
123
35 of 141
67 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
4 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
4 68 0.25% 20307 4.26% /index-2.html
5 76 0.27% 17368 3.64% /gpage17.html
6 47 0.17% 13619 2.86% /
7 104 0.38% 11495 2.41% /gpage28.html
8 81 0.29% 10913 2.29% /gpage41.html
9 49 0.18% 10157 2.13% /gpage16.html
10 65 0.24% 8685 1.82% /gpage19.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1322 4.78% 962 46.34% /default.htm
2 272 0.98% 221 10.65% /gpage30.html
3 104 0.38% 69 3.32% /gpage28.html
4 97 0.35% 55 2.65% /gpage22.html
5 76 0.27% 48 2.31% /gpage17.html
6 47 0.17% 38 1.83% /
7 65 0.24% 38 1.83% /gpage19.html
8 68 0.25% 32 1.54% /index-2.html
9 60 0.22% 31 1.49% /gpage12.html
10 60 0.22% 31 1.49% /gpage2.html
11 81 0.29% 31 1.49% /gpage41.html
12 60 0.22% 30 1.45% /gpage13.html
13 57 0.21% 29 1.40% /gpage3.html
14 56 0.20% 28 1.35% /gpage1.html
15 59 0.21% 26 1.25% /gpage21.html
16 67 0.24% 24 1.16% /gpage27.html
17 57 0.21% 20 0.96% /gpage10.html
18 49 0.18% 20 0.96% /gpage16.html
19 54 0.20% 19 0.92% /gpage20.html
20 44 0.16% 19 0.92% /gpage32.html
21 46 0.17% 17 0.82% /gpage37.html
22 51 0.18% 17 0.82% /gpage38.html
23 54 0.20% 17 0.82% /gpage8.html
24 43 0.16% 16 0.77% /gpage11.html
25 45 0.16% 16 0.77% /gpage23.html
26 51 0.18% 15 0.72% /gpage24.html
27 49 0.18% 15 0.72% /gpage25.html
28 52 0.19% 15 0.72% /gpage26.html
29 47 0.17% 15 0.72% /gpage9.html
30 44 0.16% 14 0.67% /gpage29.html

# Hits Visits URL
1 1322 4.78% 908 44.16% /default.htm
2 272 0.98% 194 9.44% /gpage30.html
3 97 0.35% 63 3.06% /gpage22.html
4 104 0.38% 56 2.72% /gpage28.html
5 76 0.27% 48 2.33% /gpage17.html
6 81 0.29% 41 1.99% /gpage41.html
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page136
103
105
124
36 of 141
68 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
5 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
8 68 0.25% 38 1.85% /index-2.html
9 47 0.17% 37 1.80% /
10 65 0.24% 37 1.80% /gpage19.html
11 67 0.24% 35 1.70% /gpage27.html
12 60 0.22% 29 1.41% /gpage13.html
13 57 0.21% 29 1.41% /gpage3.html
14 52 0.19% 25 1.22% /gpage26.html
15 54 0.20% 25 1.22% /gpage8.html

1 1848 6.69% 25 0.70% 6173 1.29% 2 0.09% 166.137.244.55
2 1804 6.53% 15 0.42% 4487 0.94% 3 0.14% 63.66.64.246
3 849 3.07% 7 0.20% 2383 0.50% 2 0.09% 63.66.64.244
4 689 2.49% 12 0.33% 2233 0.47% 4 0.19% 174.54.200.74
5 673 2.43% 11 0.31% 3825 0.80% 9 0.42% 73.49.218.222
6 640 2.32% 11 0.31% 2131 0.45% 3 0.14% 174.54.20.13
7 640 2.32% 9 0.25% 1632 0.34% 1 0.05% 74.120.68.242
8 329 1.19% 10 0.28% 1801 0.38% 1 0.05% 173.184.106.179
9 250 0.90% 5 0.14% 986 0.21% 2 0.09% 23.30.219.233
10 241 0.87% 3 0.08% 1302 0.27% 1 0.05% 70.15.106.37
11 235 0.85% 2 0.06% 844 0.18% 1 0.05% 63.66.64.247
12 230 0.83% 2 0.06% 580 0.12% 1 0.05% 162.27.9.20
13 223 0.81% 4 0.11% 673 0.14% 3 0.14% 68.3.72.85
14 214 0.77% 2 0.06% 946 0.20% 1 0.05% 50.243.37.76
15 213 0.77% 1 0.03% 431 0.09% 1 0.05% 212.143.56.219
16 178 0.64% 3 0.08% 489 0.10% 3 0.14% 167.127.218.141
17 174 0.63% 1 0.03% 815 0.17% 1 0.05% 87.100.75.134
18 173 0.63% 3 0.08% 512 0.11% 1 0.05% 166.137.240.58
19 173 0.63% 2 0.06% 676 0.14% 1 0.05% 70.215.67.23
20 172 0.62% 2 0.06% 506 0.11% 1 0.05% 108.46.38.128
21 172 0.62% 3 0.08% 792 0.17% 2 0.09% 208.87.234.202
22 165 0.60% 1 0.03% 437 0.09% 1 0.05% 37.59.175.98
23 163 0.59% 1 0.03% 433 0.09% 1 0.05% 192.243.109.179
24 152 0.55% 74 2.06% 7115 1.49% 26 1.22% 66.249.79.113
25 150 0.54% 4 0.11% 545 0.11% 1 0.05% 74.99.129.28
26 141 0.51% 129 3.60% 15477 3.25% 3 0.14% 5.9.98.130
27 134 0.48% 2 0.06% 346 0.07% 1 0.05% 96.89.188.41
28 130 0.47% 2 0.06% 600 0.13% 1 0.05% 70.215.66.138
29 126 0.46% 1 0.03% 280 0.06% 1 0.05% 167.127.104.141
30 123 0.45% 4 0.11% 1107 0.23% 1 0.05% 70.15.123.70
31 119 0.43% 2 0.06% 506 0.11% 1 0.05% 73.175.86.199
32 118 0.43% 4 0.11% 384 0.08% 1 0.05% 73.10.18.196
33 115 0.42% 1 0.03% 515 0.11% 1 0.05% 174.54.50.255
34 113 0.41% 2 0.06% 1221 0.26% 2 0.09% 162.207.2.44
35 112 0.41% 2 0.06% 401 0.08% 1 0.05% 72.169.81.20
36 111 0.40% 1 0.03% 706 0.15% 1 0.05% 42.61.210.162
37 110 0.40% 1 0.03% 252 0.05% 1 0.05% 50.241.184.25
38 110 0.40% 0 0.00% 193 0.04% 0 0.00% 66.87.82.6
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page137
104
106
125
37 of 141
69 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
6 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
39 109 0.39% 1 0.03% 250 0.05% 1 0.05% 63.66.64.245
40 109 0.39% 1 0.03% 250 0.05% 1 0.05% 70.15.153.163
41 107 0.39% 0 0.00% 188 0.04% 0 0.00% 50.153.175.45
42 104 0.38% 1 0.03% 241 0.05% 1 0.05% 166.216.165.29
43 93 0.34% 41 1.14% 2639 0.55% 23 1.08% 17.142.156.165
44 91 0.33% 1 0.03% 671 0.14% 1 0.05% 97.88.249.190
45 87 0.31% 1 0.03% 211 0.04% 1 0.05% 69.141.233.134
46 86 0.31% 85 2.37% 23 0.00% 1 0.05% 174.37.79.59
47 80 0.29% 42 1.17% 5415 1.14% 26 1.22% 66.249.79.115
48 76 0.27% 0 0.00% 133 0.03% 0 0.00% 65.55.210.237
49 74 0.27% 1 0.03% 189 0.04% 1 0.05% 96.83.143.182
50 73 0.26% 1 0.03% 187 0.04% 1 0.05% 24.229.193.105

1 67 0.24% 67 1.87% 17854 3.74% 65 3.06% 195.154.250.39
2 141 0.51% 129 3.60% 15477 3.25% 3 0.14% 5.9.98.130
3 152 0.55% 74 2.06% 7115 1.49% 26 1.22% 66.249.79.113
4 1848 6.69% 25 0.70% 6173 1.29% 2 0.09% 166.137.244.55
5 50 0.18% 48 1.34% 5740 1.20% 1 0.05% 142.4.216.172
6 80 0.29% 42 1.17% 5415 1.14% 26 1.22% 66.249.79.115
7 48 0.17% 44 1.23% 5157 1.08% 1 0.05% 138.201.88.140
8 43 0.16% 42 1.17% 5029 1.05% 1 0.05% 5.9.112.207
9 43 0.16% 42 1.17% 4984 1.05% 1 0.05% 61.142.42.7
10 1804 6.53% 15 0.42% 4487 0.94% 3 0.14% 63.66.64.246

# Hits Referrer
1 222 0.80% https://www.bing.com/search
3 52 0.19% http://keywords-monitoring-your-success.com/try.php
5 13 0.05% http://keywords-monitoring-success.com/try.php
6 12 0.04% http://money-every-day.com/
8 10 0.04% http://allsilver925.co.il/
9 10 0.04% http://arkkivoltti.net/
10 10 0.04% http://fm-upgrade.ru/
11 10 0.04% http://silvermature.net/
12 9 0.03% data-dot
13 9 0.03% http://azlex.uz/
14 9 0.03% http://free-video-tool.com/
15 8 0.03% http://burger-imperia.com/
16 8 0.03% http://lover.ru/
17 8 0.03% https://www.google.com.au/
18 7 0.03% http://all-sims.ru/
19 7 0.03% http://janettabridal.com/
20 7 0.03% http://moneytop.ru/
21 7 0.03% http://steame.ru/
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page138
105
107
126
38 of 141
70 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
7 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
22 7 0.03% http://supervesti.ru/
23 7 0.03% http://www.xpresscare.ru/
24 6 0.02% http://allkrim.com/
25 6 0.02% http://buttons-for-website.com
26 6 0.02% http://dneprsvet.com.ua/
27 6 0.02% http://euronis-free.com/
28 6 0.02% http://flooringinstallation-edmonton.com/
29 6 0.02% http://havepussy.com/
30 6 0.02% http://homelygarden.com/
31 6 0.02% http://inzn.ru/
32 6 0.02% http://kinobaks.com/
33 6 0.02% http://pornoblood.com/
35 6 0.02% http://royal-betting.net/
36 6 0.02% http://saitevpatorii.com/
37 6 0.02% http://search.yahoo.com/search
38 6 0.02% http://tires.afora.ru/
39 6 0.02% http://tmm-kurs.ru/
40 6 0.02% http://vykupavto-krasnodar.ru/
42 5 0.02% http://call-of-duty.info/
43 5 0.02% http://cool-wedding.net/
44 5 0.02% http://gsmtlf.ru/
45 5 0.02% http://office-windows.ru/
46 5 0.02% http://perm.afora.ru/
47 5 0.02% http://porno-video-chati.ru/
48 5 0.02% http://pornophoto.xyz/
49 5 0.02% http://royal-investments.net/
50 5 0.02% http://ru-z.ru/

1 4 50.00% stan caterbone allstate homeowners insurance claim lancaster pa.
2 2 25.00% allstate insurance claim stan caterbone lancaster pa.
3 1 12.50% stanley caterbone
4 1 12.50% tom caterbone

# Hits User Agent
1 13811 49.97% Safari (OSX)
4 1258 4.55% Netscape
9 85 0.31% Opera
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page139
106
108
127
39 of 141
71 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
8 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
11 64 0.23% Firefox 3
13 43 0.16% Twitterbot/1.0
20 6 0.02% Programming: URLLIB (Python library)
21 5 0.02% Firefox 2
26 3 0.01% Agent
29 3 0.01% MetaCommentBot; http://metacomment.io/about

1 19835 71.76% 1894 52.80% 271904 57.01% United States
2 2370 8.57% 54 1.51% 8197 1.72% Brazil
3 643 2.33% 139 3.88% 29521 6.19% France
4 501 1.81% 398 11.10% 46989 9.85% Germany
5 467 1.69% 334 9.31% 33727 7.07% China
6 465 1.68% 407 11.35% 25847 5.42% Ukraine
7 309 1.12% 24 0.67% 3174 0.67% Italy
8 307 1.11% 2 0.06% 572 0.12% Czech Republic
9 250 0.90% 54 1.51% 5701 1.20% Great Britain (UK)
10 232 0.84% 58 1.62% 8200 1.72% Canada
11 213 0.77% 1 0.03% 431 0.09% Israel
12 206 0.75% 4 0.11% 597 0.13% Portugal
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page140
107
109
128
40 of 141
72 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
9 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Published byHosted
ADVANCED
May
by
Toto
OMNIS
October
August
MEDIA
since
18,
22,
GROUP
2015
2016
13 123 0.45% 10 0.28% 1993 0.42% Australia
14 118 0.43% 7 0.20% 2430 0.51% Romania
15 113 0.41% 2 0.06% 428 0.09% India
16 113 0.41% 2 0.06% 316 0.07% Mexico
17 111 0.40% 1 0.03% 706 0.15% Singapore
19 102 0.37% 3 0.08% 748 0.16% Spain
21 59 0.21% 1 0.03% 615 0.13% Cayman Islands
22 59 0.21% 2 0.06% 1127 0.24% Philippines
23 58 0.21% 1 0.03% 176 0.04% Iran
24 57 0.21% 1 0.03% 159 0.03% Chile
25 57 0.21% 1 0.03% 159 0.03% Colombia
26 57 0.21% 1 0.03% 159 0.03% Macedonia
27 57 0.21% 2 0.06% 670 0.14% Uruguay
28 56 0.20% 2 0.06% 216 0.05% Angola
29 56 0.20% 2 0.06% 216 0.05% Austria
30 56 0.20% 1 0.03% 157 0.03% Belgium
Advanced STATISTICS
WEBSITE
ADVANCED Media
MEDIA
Group
GROUP
Website
WEBSTATS
Stats Page
Page141
108
110
129
41 of 141
73 108
110
129
41
73 Saturday
Thursday
Tuesday
SundayJanuary
October
August
March 10,
22,
12,
18, 2017
2016
10 of 10 8/18/2016 3:04 PM
Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS Document
Proposed 69 Filed
Anti-Stalking 11/21/16
Legislation Page 1 of 56
to Pennsylvania General Assembly
Stan J. Caterbone

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-598-2200
November 21, 2016
To: PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS

Re: STATE OF AFFAIRS AND FOLLOW-UP TO ANTI-STALKING LEGISLATION EFFORTS
As you many of you know I have been visiting your legislative staff over the past 18 months
on many occasions and distributing materials, including my proposed legislation for more effective
and comprehensive ANTI-STALKING laws in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Due to the
severity of the HARASSMENT AND TORTURE PROGRAM that I am forced to experience on a daily
basis, and the continued ESCALATION by Lancaster City Residents, Neighbors, Law Enforcement,
Court Staff, Judges, and those of Elected Office, I find that I must again refresh your office staff
with a renewed sense of urgency to hear my pleas for help, and serve as a voice of others that
are victims of the same said crimes, possibly by the same said perpetrators.
In order to UPDATE YOU WITH THE CURRENT-STATE-OF-AFFAIRS I am providing the following

updated documents via links in an effort to remind you of your responsibility to me as your
constituent and to others like me. Please review the following:
1. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION -

Monday November 14, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-J-Caterbone-and-
Conflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
2. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence

Agencies November 12, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/False-Imprisonments-and-
Illegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November-12-2016
3. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of

November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-J-
Caterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-Docket-Sheets-
as-of-November-12-2016
Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 1 of 56 Monday November 21, 2016

Proposed 69 Filed
4. FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON

FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control Research
of Monday November 7, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-Probe-Fulton-Bank-and-
3-Other-Subsidiary-Banks-of-Fulton-Financial-With-Stan-J-Caterbone-Civil-
Actions-and-Mind-Control-Research-of-Monday-Novem
5. U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter
REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/Supreme-Court-of-the-United-
States-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-to-OBAMA-Re-
CATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163

Proposed 69 Filed
ACTIVE COURT CASES
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for
Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219
Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016

Proposed 69 Filed
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated: October 10, 2015

Date Completed: July 28, 2009
Date Initiated: July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com

Proposed 69 Filed
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By
the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and
coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle
Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate
murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-
3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Proposed 69 Filed
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no MANDATORY
Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. So Stan J.
Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a desperate
attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far as
to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions of
West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Proposed 69 Filed
Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-
Work under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.

Proposed 69 Filed
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
with over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to
charitable organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the
United States as of 1992.
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and
current Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA,
and currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research
organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. Sanctions. ISC was credited with the design of the cluster
bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S. Patent Office.In 1987 ISC completed the
merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great Britain, Ferranti
International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to
Saadam Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian
Gulf War I, with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in
Iraq by Carlos Cardoen. On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited
the legal counsel of Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG,
Ltd., International Signal & Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was
billed for his services. Joseph Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J.
Caterbone's claims and would not believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

Proposed 69 Filed
James Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton
Bank, Lancaster, County.

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being
uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every
way possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.
Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where
possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and
family into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this

plan of action through money, favors, etc.,

Proposed 69 Filed
Legislation Page 10 of General
to Pennsylvania 56 Assembly
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal
community away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and
extort any monies and/or possessions of value.
Change the history of events and the truth.
THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-
2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.

Proposed 69 Filed
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND
WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and Space Aliens. He
ended up living in government subsidized housing broke and with a severe mental
illness.
Proposed 69 Filed
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has
his father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental

illness as his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn
business and finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic

Depression and had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the
financial services industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always
threatens to sue everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the
whole world is against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits
of mania and has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida, which by the
MANUAL depicts a Special Ops type of service recruiting only the most physically and
mentally fit of all of the branches of service. I have secured his ENTIRE NAVY RECORD
WITH JOURNALS AND PHOTO ALBUMS in safety deposit boxes. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings, A NOTARIZED AFFADAVIT FROM 1996,
and from his personal accounts to me, he was a victim of SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and
possibly a COVERT CARRIER as proven by his 3 PASSPORTS which depict him traveling
the world visiting countries like Hong Kong, Lispin, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Canada,
Proposed 69 Filed
France, etc. The PASSPORTS ARE SECURED IN MY SAFETY DEPOSIT BOXES. His viewing
is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized stalking,
and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a world
traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a covert
carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history laced
with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of MK
ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City Police
Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr.
was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking account. The
one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never entered into
evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster Attorney
James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his only
criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online. On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate. The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him. He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney, former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992. By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others

Proposed 69 Filed
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
THE PROBLEM WITH TOMMY'S DEATH IS THAT HE DIED ON KILL DEVIL ISLAND, NORTH
CAROLINA AND MY BROTHER SAMMY WAS MURDERED ON CHRISTMAS DAY OF 1984,
WHICH SUGGESTS SOME SORT OF ATHEIST THEME. Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that
took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and lead to his total financial ruin and collapse
in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful
death claim in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288. FULTON BANK triggered a severe
and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this day has refused to acknowledge any
wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an exceptional athlete. Playing for
Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the Harrisburg Patriots, and even
the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall
College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and landscaping business before joining
forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and selling residential mortgages. John
DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank,
owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which
was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars of equity was extorted in the process,
despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster
Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most

Proposed 69 Filed
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and

Proposed 69 Filed
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:
6. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION -

Monday November 14, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-J-Caterbone-and-
Conflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
7. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence

Agencies November 12, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/False-Imprisonments-and-
Illegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November-12-2016
8. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of

November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-J-
Caterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-Docket-Sheets-
as-of-November-12-2016
Proposed 69 Filed
9. FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON

FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control Research
of Monday November 7, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-Probe-Fulton-Bank-and-
3-Other-Subsidiary-Banks-of-Fulton-Financial-With-Stan-J-Caterbone-Civil-
Actions-and-Mind-Control-Research-of-Monday-Novem
10.U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter
REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/Supreme-Court-of-the-United-
States-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-to-OBAMA-Re-
CATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove

Proposed 69 Filed
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW
** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing AND the use of
Mind Control for the purpose of controlling everything from prosthetic limbs to cars
with the human mind has recently been commercialized by corporate America, and
certain Fortune 500 companies. For years corporations have been using Remote
Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts.. FACEBOOK is even
known to have researched and possibly developed technologies that are intended to
connect it's billions of users, via Mind Control Techniques. This is often the evolution
of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense. Top Secret
experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay secretive for so
long. This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television drama "Medium" this
last season. On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live broadcast on WHAN Coast
to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist turned Remote Viewer and
expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: November 21, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Proposed 69 Filed
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Proposed 69 Filed
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a super-
secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
Proposed 69 Filed
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:

George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.

Proposed 69 Filed
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163

Proposed 69 Filed
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Advanced Media Group, Advanced

Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words. The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that the
collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example the shareholders and affiliated professionals of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station Studios, Cross Microwave Consultants, American
Helix/High Industries, Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business,
Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my immediate family, friends, and relatives, and now the
Lancaster County Courthouse.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
And I affirm that the foregoing is true except to statements made upon information and belief,
and as to those I believe them to be true. Witness my hand under the penalties of perjury this
10th day of October, 2015.
Signature,
____________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Signature

Proposed 69 Filed
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On before me,________________________personally appeared

, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged
to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature_____________________________
Affiant______Known______Produced ID
Type of ID_________________________
(Seal)

Proposed 69 Filed
! " #$ %
%& ' % % (( ' ) #$ % %& % % #$ %& %
% #$ % " #$ % ) * ) %# ' + %
' % ( ' # ) ' & # % '! % % $ ! ( !
! % ' % $ ' %' # % '( *',
" * & % ' # '# # % ! " ! % ( ' # %

" ( % $ ( '' % "' # ( ( " "# )
* ' & " ( - $ ' % % # ' ' ' ( * %'
* ' * ! & ' ( ./01 * % * ' ' #$ & ! !
) ' & ' "' ! 2( " ' 3 3 4 ./05 * ' %
" $# ' ' 3 $ % ! * #% & $ ( & ' ( "
% "' 6 * ' & & % ( #% * ! ' '' * #% % #%
% " ! ( " & ' ( " ( # * ' ( " ( * #' '' '
( # ( 7 "$ + #((" % 8 $ ' % ' % '
% (( %$ ( '' ' ( ! " #$ % ! & %) *
#% ' " % '' ' '' * & '# ' & ! + ' %
" ' ' " 8 798 ! %#' ' + $ :: % + ' + ' # 6
)( #"" ' 3 ;' ' ;' #' '' ) $
% '' % ) " ) ' ( #' 7 ' " " % % + $ :: '
" % '' ' ( ' & # ) < * ! !* "
"" % ( " ( %' % & '
* ! ' '' * #% % # ! % ( " % '

* #% % & " %$ ' < !" & ! ' =
' '% % ! % % !% #" "$ ' " %
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page31
31
21
30
31
31
25 31
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
41
50
51
51
5651 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
October
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
10,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page32
32
31
32
32
26 32
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page33
33
32
33
33
27 33
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page34
34
33
34
34
28 34
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
! " #
$% &
' ( )! *+ ,
-''.#!' /0 12. )! /01- . !#!-/ 1

1!/ !1.230/. !/4 !45!/ .4 ".4-! #206)
5 ) ! ' 4
! 71 5 & !
+( $ +
0 8 ' 9
! "
# $ % & ' " '
()" * " ) ! + !!
, 4 ) ) 4 ) - & & ! *
.//0 1
. . 2 - ( 4 ! (0 -& , ! # .//0
2 3 ( '' ' 0 & ( ) 3
4 5 .//6 - & , ! #
7 ' / ( - ( & # .//6 ' '
! * 5 ! !)8 % 5
& ((! ' 4 ' ./,0
0 2 1 ( " ( ' ( # ( !
.//6 ' 4 ' ./,0
6 ! : 2 3 ( ' 5 # & 5 &
( ! ' ' .//6
9 5 / (' % .//: ' 4 '
: " 2 ( ' ( & #
% .//: ' 4 ' ./,0
; 5 ( ' ( * 5 .//: *
< 8 ' 4 '
,/ 3 ; (' ( & ) .//: ' 4 '
,, ' ' 4 3 ( )= 1
# .//; , ! #
,. ! 3 < 2 3 (' ( # .//; ' 4 '
,2 " 6 # " 6 ( " (
( * ! # * .//;

Proposed 69 Filed
,7 1#-& & < (' ( " ( * ./,/ ' 4 '

,0 ' 4 2 3 (' ( > 1 * ./,/ '
4 '
,6 " < (' ( 1 & $ ( !
1 4 ./,/ ' 4 '
,9 0<; < 3 (' (# .0 ./,/ # & ) ' 4 '
,: & 3 (& & ( # .6 ./,/ & 4 &
8
=' # ; (% & % #1 # .0 ./,/ 1 5
& 4 + $& & # !
5
$ 1 & 2 3 ( : ./,0 8 )
$ " 6 ( =( $ %( # $
!
1 +
$$ 5 / ( * .//,0 % 8
$, ' 4 3 ( ./,0 ?
$> 3 ( '' ' 0 #

% ./,, /0 ..::
4 5 $& 1 !
$% ? ) " * ./,0
,.0. 4 &
$+ ) '@ 3 (/ 0 3 ( ' .2 ./,0
+ 1 !8# ( '" 5 > (
1 & + (
! 1
$* " & 3 0 4 ./,6
! ! ( !
1
$A ) ! # < 0 @ ( ; ( )! -
!1 >8# % ?
? @!8>>$ " 8' 84 *$1 ! ( ( )'48>!)#)'" '1 8( " ! '&A
$= 6 & & ' & # ; ./,6

'& + 3 4 # # +
1!
$& 4 4
, ' / 9 * ./,6
@ (' A
#8< '" ( # (
2, 1.''6 ,+ ( " $ +
=
,$ B 2 3 ( " #
# '& 4 # #
,, ! 3 < - ) ( *
@# A
,> ! (3 ( " 98 " * ,7 ./,6 &
,% 1 ) 2 3 2 9
" * ,7 ./,6

Proposed 69 Filed
./,0
( ! 8 &
8 & 3
4 ' . <
?;0'. !'. 1!':-/#( ;!2! "./1( !/4 0''6 -0/ 10 );B - !' 1;2.!1 0&
5-0'./ . 0/ ! 2.#6'!2 3! - ( $ %
B 2 3
" 3 ) @
! 3 < - )
1.''-6 ,+ - ) (/ (
! (3 ( "
3
0<; 3 2
' 4
1 ) 2 3 2
1 & 1
' ) 4 ; @
1 B # ,: ./,6

Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 37
37
36
37
37
32
27 37
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 38
38
37
38
38
33
28 38
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 39
39
38
39
39
34
29 39
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
! " # " $% &
! " #
$ %
"&# '
$ ( %
' ( " ") " * ) ! " ! + " * " ,

! , "" ! " ! " ! " ! , ,
+ " - ! ! )
*
% ( *
(
%
! .
/"0 ! , * 1 ! + 2"3
4 - 1 " " 1 , ! !
4 1 , ! ! ) ** ! "
! 5 6 ) " " # 4 4 + &,,-
. . $ / ..$/
&,,0
% % 1 2 1
%
&,, 3 &,, %
4 %
%
& , , " " " !, " 5

00 6
7 8 9
%
: 7 - 8, 9 , "2 ! " , , , ! 1 , ** !
, ! : 7 ) , . 4 ;
&,,- ( &<;= 5 (
> $;$ ? $
! % % 4
1 &,,@ &,,= ,
$ >
A 1 B3 .+
&,,=
1 B3 2
>
%
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 40
40
39
40
40
35
30 40
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
< ) * " ) ! A 24
1 ! ' &,, &, , A %
1 2 5 % % " #9 9
- ! ) " " " ; " , . 4

4 "$ C# &,,@(&,,= A D $
3 1 B 3 24 %
5
! %
% &,,0 4 % %
! %3 %
@ < " - "" * ,! " + , :

! * % E % 0 =
9 9
$ 0 =9 00&9 00 &,,- &, , $
!
% %
! %
D 3 $ ! % %
3
= )) /4 0 ), " $ ;
F G + 0 = / F G %
! + $ 3 00 &,,<
3 * E
3 3 " H %#
$ / %
$ D $ $ . +
&,,- &, ,
4 !- " , - .
3 * &,,@ D $ / B
$ &,,
0 6 -) ! 24 0 = . A * D
/ 4 / 00 3 $ 00=; 00 .
5 :
, # ! 7 3 %
&,,- &, , ! D $
$ ! D $ 3 D 3 $ D % A
D E 7F ! 8F
D $ &,,- &,,0 >
% ! D $
3 D A %
; % . + % %
4 E
$
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 41
41
40
41
41
36
31 41
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
) 7 24 00
F F A $;$ (F 7 8 !
.
,-(&& &,,- 1 $
2 1 3
& # = $ % &,,- D $ /
B 3 1
: 5 " * < :# ) " . 0 = / F G

00 9 00=( 00 9 &,,- &, , . 3 B
B 3 1 $ 3
. / $
< > ) "" "" " 0 =

/ ;3 $ &,,@
- #, " ! "" " E % D E $

&,,- $ D 3
@ " " " 24 = 0 = &, &,,- &,,@

$ 3 D $ $ $ 3 !
= " ) " " = , D $ 3 0 =

@, &,,@ ! @, 1
&,,@
9
!
@, !
#" !, ! " "1 , " ! "* # ) ": - " E

0 = / F
G . &,,-
! !
B 3
0 " # ) . 0 = / F G 00 9
00=( 00 9 &,,- &, , . 3 B
B 3 1 $ 3 /
$ : &,,-
' 9 9 9 9 9 A
&, ( " , !
. 00 $ 3
$ ! 7 8
&, , !
F &,, &, ,
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 42
42
41
42
42
37
32 42
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
& , * " *# ) F ) $
&& " : !- &,,- 4
% A D $ 3 1
&: ;! , ! " > ? " 24 &,,0

5 > ; B
%
&< ) < !- $ / %
$ D $ $ . + &,,-
&, , F $ %
&, , 5 % % (
2 %
&- - A &,,- &, , $ A )

A + .+ $ $
&@ * ! : : , * * @ 7 " . 3
0 = &,, &,,0
3 *
&= 5 ! ! 6 ) " " 7 "! ) " ": )" .

4 &,,@ E 4 &,,@
"
#
& 5 ! !6 ) " " ; . 4 &,,-
&0 ! < ") + " . / 0 = "&# @

- 9 &,,@ : 9 &,,0
9 &, , . $ $ / B
00 &,,
:, 7 ) , * * ! " F
0 =
A ;A 0 =
F 0 =
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 43
43
42
43
43
38
33 43
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
3 ! ! 6 0 = 0 =
" $ . .
+ 1 $ . #
I $ $ "2
! $ + # ' J +
. 00&
+$;F &,;&, F 00 ! '
D 3 $ 24
"$ A + 1 . #
$ $ $ 1 1 "1E1# $
K 0=,K
E K 3 > L F F . A
A . F + B + 1 $
+ 1 $ $
$ 1
1 B 6 $ 3 >
+ B 1 $
$ ! 00,K
> 1 B 3 > 1 B3 F
! F ! ! A ! ! >
1 1
00 % F F
) % 3 F 7 8
&,,- & 1 1
! 4 '
A
. 3 ! 4
A F 4 0<,K 4
0=,K 0 ,K 00,K
9 A .
1 3 > % 2! 4
/ &,, F ) %$ A .
0@,K D 1 4 A? D!B
0@,K " # +
$ 0 <9 F $ $ * 00 /
7 D 18
.
E % 0 =
$ % 0 ,K M
M 1 $ 0 = 00
00= E % / % 4 !
&,,- (
9 9
; !
1 $ $ !2B+EF2
D $ 3 ,-( (&&
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 44
44
43
44
44
39
34 44
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
# ") ! "
7! N (
O O
N
.
!
5 4 (
F 5 (
G A 8
A' , ? * ? 1 * " " * #" !, " " , , * 7 "
!, A ,
( > " !, '! B $C * #" !, D ! " &
73 "
# (
K ; 2
.
" #( K !
; 5
7 ! 8 9 9 9 9
9 9 %
! % (
% '
5
% !
7A 8 ! $ ' O 7D .2 (
8 ! 8 *
O
% 8
' + ( -
7 (
' % (
! % % %
4 %
K
K M M M % M
% (
K 8
' + - 6 "
7E %
' N %( (
4 (
; ! (
(
7 8 (
7 8
87 - 7 > !,
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 45
45
44
45
45
40
35 45
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
! * , " 1"
! , * 1 3
@ E ! DD ! 1 * )) )
@ E ! DD -
B &. @ DD
B @ . DD ") ! " , " *" * ( ! ") "
"
B @ & DD ) "
B @ . DD ) * , " ! * 1
B @ & DD ) ! * " *
B @ $ DD ") ! 7
B @ DD 7
B @ E DD "!
" * *
. @ EB& DD ! * ) * , "
. @ EB DD ") ! 1 ,! * , "
& @ & B DD 6, " 1 ) ! "
B @ DD 5 " ! !
B @ & DD 1 "": !
B @ DD ) 1 , 1 "": !
B @ & DD > " 1 "": !
B @ DD ' " ! ! " ! * ! * " "
B@ E DD ) ; !" * , " ) ) " !

) * 1 ,"
B@ % DD *) F ) ! , ! ) F
"E # PPPPPPP " %#
>7 '?
% 4 %
" Stan J. Caterbone

# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F " Stan J. Caterbone

# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
1 June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP $
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Lancaster
19
PPPPPPP June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP 15
&,PP
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 F 3 24 Don't Know When
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC I
. . $ / I $ Q &, , "!
&, , . . $ / I #
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 46
46
45
46
46
41
36 46
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 47
47
46
47
47
42
37 47
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41 06/10/2007
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 48
48
47
48
48
43
38 48
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41 06/10/2007
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 49
49
48
49
49
44
39 49
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 50
50
49
50
50
45
40 50
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 51
51
50
51
51
46
41 51
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
50
51
51
5651
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
November
October15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11, 2015
2016
21, 2015
10,
Proposed 69 Filed
! "# $
%" "&##'( #$
!"
# $ " " ! #!" ! ! % &! ' ! # ( ' )
* + , ) -
#- ) . - / * ) '
) 0 /- -
/ * . - . 0 ) - - 0 ) #- /
/- . - * - 0 1 /
* ) 0 0 . - 0 - 2 *
) 3 . 0 . /
- 0 ) . 4 * . 5678 0 )
. / 9::; ' - - 9::; /
- 0 - 0 / .1 0 - -
- 0 ) - ) <
)
) * * + + ,, -
* . /+ / , - * ,! + 0
1 , ! 2 3 + ,
- 344/// 4 5
6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
7- , , - * , - , / * * 3
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
247
22
1of
2of
of
2of
1
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGroup
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 148
11of
1of
of
1of
of
51
of
51
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
November 2016
17,
15,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
% "
% "
/
4 4 2 1
12! 1 3
" # $ "% $ $ $ & ' $ ($ "

' " & % $ ) $% $ % ) ) " % "
($ ) ' $ ' ) $% $ "" " "& %
!& ! ) "
# $ %" " "% ) " %% ) ) $

* % +, " # -
. ' * %& # & & & ) - ! & $

# &"
& ) " #' % ) $ % '" & $

* % +, "
# $ "% %% '$ "
" !
+ % / 0$
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 449
44
3of
4of
of
4of
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 350
33
2of
3of
of
3of
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
8 * 9 : * ; < *+ ; ) .
- 7 (
#- 0 - =8 * 9 : * ; < *+ ; )
. >>>
* !
& *
5, #- . - .- ) - - #- "
) )= - 0 - .- - 0 .
- ) - )-
9, 0 ( / 5697 > - ) 0 ) - .-
? 0 - ) - - .- - 0 - ? )
- - - - . - . 0 - .- ?- 0
0 - ) .- - .- 0 4 0 >
@, #- ) ) - 0 . - / - - 0 - -
) - - 0 2 #- 0 . ) -
- - 0 0 ) 0 0 - .
A,#- . 0 0 . - . ) - < -
@ ) - < . # - B 0 ) - 0
" . . # 0 . 0 - 2 .
- < ) ) ) -
.& !
# - . ) - /- ) ) 3
. 0 - . . /
) ) - ) / .C * . - . 0 - - 0 2
- 0) - < 4
$ 8 * 9 : *
) /0 / ) 0 ) / / ) 0
- - /- 0 * - / - - -
) ) - - ) - ) )- - 00 ) 0 - . )
- 0 ) . 4 * . - 0 0 ) 2 0 -
0 - - +D 5 :::, - - ) 0 0
0 0 )
) / 0 + , /- - 0 .
2 - )) - . - - + ,
. - 0 - - - 0 0 - ) / -
)
B - ) - ?- ? 0 . . * / . / ) )
) - 0 0 4 -
0 . - - . 0 E
EE
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
551
55
4of
5of
of
5of
2
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
B - ) - ? ) ? 0 / 0 .
) 0 - / - . )
/ - - 0 . )? ) ?
B - ) - ? - ? 0 / - . -
) 0 - .- - ) 00 - 0
) 0 ) / 00 0
0 / - - - - - . ) - - )
) - - ) - ) ) - - ) 0
0 / - - - - - /- - .
) - - ) ) - - ) - ) ) - - ) 0
- - ) - -
- - #- ) 0 * . - - -
- / - -
0 . )? - ?
B ) - - 0? 00 ? 0
- - 0 ) F 0 - . -
-
#- . - . . - ) ) 0
/ - - 0 - 0 ) 5: 0 - -
) - . - - . - ) . - )
- ) ) - - ) ) - ) ) - 0 -
- 00 ) 0
B ) - ? 00 ) 0 ? 0 -
. )) / - - . - /- .
- - - /- / - - F0 - . - - -
? ! - , -
/- / ) - 00 0 /- - / - .
2 - / - - ) - - 0 0
/ . 0 ) 00 * - )
- ) . /- - ) - 0
/- - 0 3 00 ) -
- . ) 00 ) F ) - -
- - ) ) - - / ) ) -
- 00 ) 0 G ) - - 0 0 ) F
B - ) - ? 00 ) 0 ? 0 /- - 0 .
- . )) / - - .
- /- . - - - /- / - - F0 - .
- - -
?! 00 ? 0 - -
0 ) F0 - . - -
8 - * + *
+ , ! /- / - - 0 *
0 ) 00 / - - - -
. . - - - ) 2 -
0 0 ) - - ) 0 . )
0 0 - . - - - 0
. ) -
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
652
66
5of
6of
of
6of
3
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
+ , ! /- 0 * - 0 *
0 ) 00 / - - - -
/- - ) 0 0 * . - -
. ) 0 0 - . - - -
0 . ) -
! /- 0 * - 0 *
0 ) 00 / - - - - -
) / * . ) 0 0 - ) ) 0 - -
+D 5 :::, 0 0 ) ) 0 - -
- ) 0 0 - . - - -
0 . ) - #- ) - ) - ) / .
0 F C
+5, #- 0 . 2 -
0 ) - )) - . - - -
+9, #- 0 * - 0 * 0 )
00 / - - - - - )
/ * . 0 - 5: 0 9A=- /- - ) 0
0 * . - - - -
0 - / * ) ) 0 0 /- ) 0
- ) 0 - / - /- 0 - - - - -
. . . 0 - - . . . . 0 -
+ , )) 00 ) - 0 0 - 00 /-
- - / 0 )) 00 )
00 0 0 . - 0 0 - 00
/- - 00 00 / . ) / -
+ , + , + , + , /- - . / - 0 *
- 3 . ) 0 - - + , + ,
+ , . -
+), ) . - F 0 ) )
- - 0 ) - -
.
+., B ) - - 0 ? 00 ?
0 - - 0 ) F 0 - .
- -
+/ - *+ /
/- - ) . 4 * . - 0 00
- ) - / - - 4 . / - -
0 0 ) ) / - ) ) F .
- +D5: :::,
B - ) - 0 - . / ) -
) .
. 0 + 0 . 0 0
0 . 0 F 0 / ) 3 +! B, / ) 3 +< B,
. , . - * / . 0 )
) . - 2 1 0 . . . + - . ) - -
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
753
77
6of
7of
of
7of
4
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
0 - - - 0 / = . ) = =
= 0 . 0 . - - .
. ) - ) 0) / 0
0 . 0 0 ) - 1 F . - 0 .
. - )
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
854
88
7of
8of
of
8of
5
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
!
" # #
$ # ! " %
& # ' " ( # ) * ()+
"
, - ." ! %
/ # "" # "
, %/ #
0 " %
1 ( # ) 1 ( #
- ! . # "
%2 3 # %4
" 5%1% "
%4 "' %
#
" !" "
0 % ()
! # %
() 6 7 8 0 # " # "
%9 & : ' "
# ' " %
-4, " # # "
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
955
99
8of
9of
of
9of
8
of
51
of
51
50
51
51
51
56 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016
Proposed 69 Filed
.' %
' # # !
# " "
" %'
() ;
" %
<= 0 " %
# " 9 (
" 5%1% " " !
%
( - !; . " ()
( , ! ! " >?
-1 @ . # # % @ #
" 511 @ # " ; ,
# "" # ( %
1 @ ( - ,
" % 5%1% ( 4 A 1
4 1 ) %
() # ;
# 5%1% # # " "
" " % 0 #
%B " #
# %
-4 , " #
. 0 %
, %
- 0 " C 4 $
. %- #
%' # " C%% ,
4 %.
) 7 ) - # . ' ,
" %
-: 5 1 # .)
% -@ ; %' " %@
%4, "
$ " , %.
D $ , !
2 ) $&
, 1 C% E
Advanced
Stan
Stan
Stan J.
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
CaterboneGrop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
ExecutiveRelease
Release
Summary
Summary
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page10
10
10
56910
10
of
of
9of
of51
50
of
51
51
51
5651 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Monday March
December
15,
March
2016
November15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
11,
21, 2015
2016

History of The Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group March 12, 2017

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

History of The Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group March 12, 2017

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Stan J.

April 20, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.

ACTIVE COURT CASES

Internet history timeline

From ARPANET to NSFNET

In 1986, the NSF created NSFNET, a 56 kbit/s backbone to support the

Transition towards the Internet

TCP/IP goes global (1980s)

The early global "digital divide" emerges

While developed countries with technological infrastructures were joining the

In 1996, a USAID funded project, the Leland Initiative, started work on

Asia and Oceania

Rise of the global Internet (late 1980s/early 1990s onward)

In 1992, the U.S. Congress passed the Scientific and Advanced-Technology

World Wide Web and introduction of browsers

Use in wider society 1990s to early 2000s (Web 1.0)

The call to "Web 2.0" in 2004 (first suggested in 1999),

and shortly after (approximately 20072008 onward):

The mobile revolution

Networking in outer space

NIC, InterNIC, IANA and ICANN

Internet Engineering Task Force

Request for Comments

The Internet Society

Politicization of the Internet

The spreading of ideas and opinions;

Use and culture

From Gopher to the WWW

Mobile phones and the Internet

Doug Gale (2007)[181]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Internet&oldid=735317555"

Categories: American inventions History of the Internet Internet governance

Escaping the UNIX1 Tar Pit

The NIST Automated Speech Recognition Group

NIST and CD-ROM

A UNIX-Based CD-ROM Preparation Workstation

A Data Submission Problem

The UNIX tar Answer?

The Real "Tar Pit" -- Universal Operability

The Challenge Ahead

HITS % OF TOTAL SERVER NETWORK

1. 15,870 54.29% SERVER Network

ACTIVE COURT CASES

Usage Statistics for amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Monthly Statistics for November 2009

Total Hits 29234

Total Unique Sites 491

Hits per Hour 64 533

Hits by Response Code

Code 200 - OK 27082

Daily Statistics for November 2009

Day Hits Files Pages Visits Sites KBytes

1 758 2.59% 682 2.52% 46 2.30% 23 2.54% 26 5.30% 8811 2.68%

2 1578 5.40% 1356 5.01% 90 4.51% 52 5.73% 48 9.78% 16646 5.06%

4 959 3.28% 923 3.41% 65 3.26% 44 4.85% 41 8.35% 11711 3.56%

5 1713 5.86% 1637 6.04% 88 4.41% 48 5.29% 38 7.74% 16513 5.02%

6 1270 4.34% 1245 4.60% 78 3.91% 64 7.06% 39 7.94% 14399 4.38%

7 791 2.71% 719 2.65% 73 3.66% 46 5.07% 32 6.52% 12672 3.85%

12 1857 6.35% 1620 5.98% 74 3.71% 46 5.07% 43 8.76% 12992 3.95%

13 1487 5.09% 1445 5.34% 96 4.81% 42 4.63% 41 8.35% 15859 4.82%