Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2
binder asphalt replacement and can be surfaced with asphalt if desired. Surface mix design which
is made up of smaller aggregates for enhanced smoothness is provided.
2. Dam construction
RCC has three key properties that make it uniquely suited for dams: economy, performance, and
high-speed construction. It has the strength and durability of conventional concrete, but at a cost
that rivals earth or rock fill construction.
RCC can be used to build new dams or to shore up old ones. It protects dams from over-topping
failure, earthquakes, and erosion.
It can be placed quickly and easily with large-volume earth-moving equipment. It's generally
transported by dump trucks, spread by bulldozers, and compacted by vibratory rollers. Sections
are built lift-by-lift in successive horizontal layers so the downstream slope resembles a concrete
staircase. Once a layer is placed, it can immediately support the earth-moving equipment to place
the next layer. After RCC is deposited on the lift surface, small dozers typically spread it in thick
layers. Workers also place it with motor graders, spreader boxes, and paving machines
1.5 Benefits
1. Supports heavy, repetitive loads without failure and spans localized soft subgrade areas,
which reduces maintenance costs and down time.
2. Withstands high concentrated loads and impacts from heavy industrial, military, and mining
applications.
3. Eliminates rutting and subsequent repairs.
3
4. Provides excellent durability, even under freeze-thaw conditions; eliminates seepage through
pavement.
5. Increases strength, reduces permeability, and enhances durability and resistance to chemical
attack.
6. Provides high shear resistance at joints and uncontrolled cracks to prevent vertical
displacement or faulting.
7. Speeds and simplifies construction, reduces costs.
8. Speeds construction, reduces cost, and minimizes labor.
9. Speeds construction, reduces cost. (To enhance appearance, joints can be sawn into RCC
pavement.)
10.Resists abrasion, eliminates need for surface course and reduces cost. The light color
reduces lighting requirements for parking and storage areas
1.6 Limitations
1. Aesthetics - RCC does not have the same appearance as other types of concrete. It is
NOT as pretty and smooth as regular concrete.
2. Rougher Surface Texture - The mix design and construction methods that make roller
compacted concrete so fast, easy, cheap, and durable also create a surface texture that
gives it a characteristic coarse finish.
3. Limited to low-speed traffic - Due to the nature of its surface, RCC is not appropriate for
all types of traffic. Vehicles traveling at high speeds would experience a bumpy ride.
That makes it better for applications where strength and durability are needed instead of
speed.
4. Leakage may happen in Dams Due to the nature of its surfaces and the way of the
constructions layer bay layers in the dams leakage of water may be happen and
treatments are needed in the ends extra cost may be needed.
2.0 MATERIALS
4
The intended use of RCC dictates the materials to be used, the project specifications must clearly state the
material requirement that will meet the design and performance objectives.
2.1 Aggregates
This constitute both coarse and fine aggregates and are well blended. Coarse aggregates consist of
crushed or uncrushed gravel and fine aggregates consist of natural sand or any other form of fine
aggregates. Due to sharp interlocking edges of the aggregate particles crushed aggregates produce a better
RCC mix.
The American concrete institute (ACI) has established aggregate gradation limits that produce quality
RCC mixtures. These ACI gradation limits effectively allow the use of blends of standard size coarse
aggregate. From ASTM C 33, the most common sizes used include No. 67, No.7, No.8, and No.89.
ACI and the Portland Cement Association (PCA) recommend the use of dense, well-graded blends with
nominal maximum size aggregate not exceeding 1-inch (25mm) in order to help minimize segregation
and produce a smooth finished surface. Gap-graded mixes that are dominated by two or three aggregate
sizes are not desirable for RCC. Additionally, the recommended gradation calls for a content of fine
particles (2% to 8% passing the No. 200 sieve). This eliminates the need for washed aggregates in many
cases and produces a mix that is stable during rolling.
5
In order to produce a good quality RCC mix, a systematic procedure based on the aggregates, water and
cementitious materials is used in the mix.
There exists a number of design mix methods the accepted common methods include
3.1 Proportioning by use of Concrete consistency testing
This method uses consistency of the individual ingredients, consistency tests normally require the
establishment of specific mixture parameters-such as the amount of aggregate, the amount water, or the
amount of cementitious materials then adjust one of these parameters in order to meet the required
consistency, workability, or strength.
3.2 Proportioning by use of the solid suspension Model
This proportioning method is used to determine the proportions of each of the dry solid ingredients
(cement, fly ash, silica fume, sand and coarse aggregate) that optimizes the dry packing density of a given
RCC mixture. Using this optimized dry packing density, the amount of water necessary to entirely fill the
void spaces between the dry ingredients can easily be calculated.
The main advantage of the solid suspension model is that it can be used to recalculate very quickly the
optimum proportions of RCC mixture without having to prepare a large number of laboratory trial
batches. (Marchand 1997)
3.3 Proportioning by use of the optimal paste volume method
Because the workability of an RCC mix is one of its main requirements, this method stresses a mix design
that will meet specified workability requirements. It is based on the assumption that an optimal mix
should have just enough paste to completely fill any remaining voids after the aggregates have reached
their maximum density under compaction.
The optimal paste volume method has three major steps. The first step is to select an aggregate gradation
that contains a minimal volume of voids for a given compaction energy. In the second step, the volume of
remaining voids is used to adjust the volumetric dosage of paste in order to obtain the required
workability. The third and final step involves the selection of the W/(C + P) ratio and the proportions of
cement and any other cementitious materials that will produce a paste with enough binding capacity to
satisfy the strength requirements of the project. (Gagne 1999)
3.4 Proportioning by use of soil compaction tests
This proportioning method involves establishing a relationship between the density and moisture content
of an RCC mix by compacting samples over a range of moisture contents as described in the section of
this document titled Moisture-Density Relationship. Moisture-density tests are conducted and moisture-
density curves are established over a range of cementitious material contents. Strength test specimens are
then prepared by compacting specimens at the optimum moisture content for each particular cementitious
material content. From these tests, a plot of strength versus cementitious material content is established to
select the minimum cementitious materials content that will meet the design requirements (ACI 2004)
6
A moisture-density test is used to determine the optimum moisture content and maximum density of RCC
mixtures. The modified Proctor compaction test (ASTM D 1557) is a common and familiar procedure for
most geotechnical and materials testing laboratories to perform.
4.0 PRODUCTION
4.1 Mixing equipment
There various kind of equipment used in the production of RCC though these depend on the magnitude
and nature of the project.
Transit Mixers
These are tailored for small scale production since they have slower mixing and discharge times.
Tilt Drum mixers
By far the most common central mixing unit, tilt drum mixers (either portable or permanent) have
regional availability coupled with fast, quality-consistent production capabilities, making them
suitable for most RCC projects
Mobile Truck mixers
Versatility and speed are advantages of mobile truck mixers since all componentsaggregates,
cement, and waterare stored in separate compartments on the truck unit
7
Whether single-shaft or dual-shaft, portable or permanent, continuous flow (as in a pug mill) or
compulsory batch, spiral ribbon or paddle, horizontal shaft mixers provide the most intense and
fastest mixing action, making them the best choice for larger and high production-oriented
projects.
Figure: Continuous flow pug mill mixer Figure: Portable horizontal shaft mixer
5.0 TRANSPORTATION
8
Regardless of the mixing and batching method chosen, the RCC mix is almost always transported to the
job site in dump trucks. These dump trucks should be equipped with covers in order to protect the RCC
mix from the elements and to ensure efficient placement. While RCC can be produced directly into dump
trucks from tilt drum and horizontal shaft mixers, the use of transit mixers involves the additional step of
discharging into a dump truck for delivery. Because of the very dry consistency of RCC, the use of
fluidizing admixtures is recommended when mixing or hauling RCC in transit mixers
9
6.3 Lift surface preparation
Lift surface preparation is important especially in providing bond between the lifts. There are various
reasons for ensuring proper bond
7.0 CONCLUSION
The advent of roller compacted concrete has greatly reduced the project time, cost and improved
performance of the structures constructed. This makes use of RCC more economical as a result of the
simplified method of production and application which are cost and time saving.
7.0 REFERENCES
1. ACI (2004). Manual of Concrete Practice. Roller Compacted Concrete
2. Gagne, R. (1999). "Mixture Proportioning of Non-Air-Entrained RCC for
Pavements." Concrete international 21(5).
3. Marchand, J., Gagne, R., Lepage, S., and Ouellet, E., (1997). Mixture
proportioning of Roller - Compacted Concrete for Dams and Pavement
Construction. Third CANMET/ACI International Symposium on Advances in
Concrete Technology.
4. PCA (2002). "Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures." Portland Cement
Association.
5. Piggot, R. W. (1999). "Roller-Compacted concrete Pavements-A Study of Long
Term Performance." Portland Cement Association RP366.
6. United States. Bureau of Reclamation. (1987). Design of small dams.
Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of the Interior For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S.
G.P.O.
10
11