Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
must effectively apply the principles of bioethics. In his/her daily mundane task
as a health care provider, the skills in working effectively with the health care
team, patients, and their families, as well as in decisionmaking, require a deep
understanding of many ethical principles. Internationally, the World Medical
Association established medical ethics for physicians for that purpose. Locally,
the Philippine Medical Association (PMA), in cooperation with the Professional
Regulatory Board for Medicine of the Professional Regulations Commission, has
revised the Code of Medical Ethics for physicians.
Then he/she can choose the action most in line w'th his/her commitment to a
Supreme Being (Cod, Allah, Budd ha, etc.), oneself, the patient and his/her
family, and the communitv.
The Hippocratic Oath is the first universal oath for which physicians in all
countries have sworn by. As previously mentioned, there are international and
national codes of medical ethics. The national code takes into consideration local
issues and concerns. Thus, it consider Filipino values and characteristics of
Clinical Family Medicine as possrble influences for medical ethics.
8. The pressure of conflicting duties on the family physician due to a health care
system organization and changes to this set-up.
Medical ethics or bioethics is the study of moral issues in the fields of medical
treatment and research. The term is sometimes used more generally to describe
ethical issues in the life sciences and the distribution of scarce medical resources
(Ashely, 2002; Alora, 2006).
Manson cited the components of medical ethics from the core curriculum for
medical ethics in the British medical schools broad scope and clinical application
of Medical Ethics Education (2008):
Informed consent and refusal of treatment why the concepts of respect for
autonomy adequate information, treatment without consent, competence,
battery, and negligence are important.
The new genetics ~ treating the abnormal versus improving the normal; and
debates about the ethical boundaries of, and the need to regulate, genetic
therapy and research.
Mental disorders and disabilities ethical and legal justification for detention and
treatment without consent; and conflicts of interests between patient, family,
and community.
Life, death, dying, and killing -the duty of care and ethical and legal justification
for the non-provision of life-prolonging treatment and the provision of potentially
life-shortening palliatives, transplantation, death certification, and the coroners
court.
The duties of doctors and medical students public expectations of medicine, the
need for teamwork, the health of doctors and students in relation to professional
performance, professional regulation, clinical mistakes, and whistle-blowing.
Resource allocation rationing and the fair and just distribution of scarce health
care, the relevance of needs, rights, utility, efficiency, desert, and autonomy to
theories of equitable health care, and boundaries of responsibility of individuals
for their own health.
Rights what rights are and their links with moral and professional duties: the
importance of the concept of rights for good medical practice.
In life, there are eight basic principles that should be followed. These axioms are
congruent to what are taught in medical ethics. They are as follows:
lnvtolabttity of Life
All human life is sacred; as such, family doctors must remember that it is a gift,
the fruit of love. It is a doctor's duty to affirm, respect, love
not the highest good. One does not have to do everything (disproportionate
means) to prevent death, and at the proper time, a person should be allowed to
die gracefully.
Stewardship
Totality and Integrity of the Human Person It should be each and every doctors
commitment to protect the integrity of the body and its functions and to observe
the correlative prohibition of mutilation of the patient's body.
Every act that doctors do must not be harmful to others; it must be moral and
the basic objective must be for the benefit of the other person that they are
taking care of. There are four conditions that usually apply to the principle of
double effect:
The action itself must not be intrinsically wrong; it must be a good or a neutral
act. Only the good effect, not the bad, must be intended, even though it can be
foreseen. The bad effect must not be the means of the good effect.
The good effect must outweigh the evil effect that is permitted.
The physician may apply these four criteria to the case he/she handles, and
make sure that the principle of double effect applies, and the
four conditions are not violated by the prescribed treatment plan (Manlangit,
2010). Example: Choosing between the life and death of a fetus ' . in a'mother.
who has uterine carcinoma. . '
When considering a medical treatment for a patient, one speaks of ordinary and
proportionate care versus extraordinary and disproportionate care.
Example:
The reference point is the patient. The continuous exposure to a lot of risks when
dealing with our infectious patients is another example of double effect.
Solidarity
Health care providers must always aim to help patients who are needy and be
able to act kindly and compassionately towards the patients. It is also their duty
to cooperate effectively with the members of a health team. They should be able
to advocate for a just health policy/package accessible to the marginalized,
avoiding profit-making from health services, as well as manipulating or exploiting
the disadvantaged just so they can have personal gain.
Subsidiarity
Physicians must remember that they are entrusted with the functions that they
are capable of performing because of the training that they had. Doctors should
give their patients that human dignity and responsibility to make decisions for
themselves and assist them in that decision they need to take.
Issues arise in the new reproductive technology where either the unitized or
procreative functions are suppressed. To exclude one is to offer less than the
whole and to render the union less than complete. An example is the use of
contraceptives and in-vitro fertilization (Ashley, 2002).
These are the bioethical principles that govern physicians relationships with
their patients (Malangit, 2010).
Nonmaleticence
Role of Health Care Professionals ' Become the basis for standard of care and
reaffirm the need for competence in everything they do. They must undergo
continuing medical education to upgrade their skills and knowledge so that their
patients will not suffer because of ignorance. Emphasize risks and benefits in
any decision that they must make in managing the health problems of their
patients. 0 Through this principle, the definitions of negligence, malpractice,
physician's error, and medical mistakes are based.
The professional must have a duty to the affected party-just like a patient of a
physician;
The professional must breach that duty; . ' ' , ' . ' The affected party must
experience harm; and .
This principle affirms the need for medical competence. It is clear that medical
mistakes occur; however, this principle articulates a fundamental commitment
on the part of the health care professionals to protect their patients from harm.
Examples:
Performing surgery on a patient and the physician was not competent to do so.
The patient died in the process. '
Beneficence
Beneficence refers to the traditional role of the physician as the Good Samaritan.
Compassionate physicians perform acts of charity, kindness, and mercy; come to
the aid of the injured, the sick, and the dying; and relieve suffering. Natural or
comfort care, the offering of food and water, and the maintenance of body
temperature, and cleanliness for the dying elderly patient are forms of
beneficence, as well as comforting the patient through a loving presence,
palliation, and prayer.
Example:
justice
There are various of factors used as criteria for distributive justice (See Box 2).
Role of the Health Care Professional 0 In delivering health care, give each patient
what is due: the available care he/she needs, inf rmation, and confidentiality.
rovide equal health care to all patients in: thou! discrimination. W k towards just
health care policies such a delivery of basic health care to all g to their needs. ' A
' g v'ng undue burden to individuals3 poor by using them as learning t r o
inducing them to donate an or ( rice.
0 each person an equal share Yo each person according to need To each person
according to eitort To each person according to contribution To each person
according to merit To each person according to tree-market e changes
Autonomy
autonomy and this should be respected unless his/ her actions constitute an evil
act. ' This principle is the basis'for the-practice of informed consent and
emphasizes the need for the competence and voluntariness to consent or
withdraw the procedures or treatment that a doctor wants to give to the patient.
If the patient is incompetent, a knowledgeable proxy who could give the consent
should be sought. An example is the consent of the parents whose child will
undergo surgery (Tan-Alora, 2006).
Confidentiality
Role Fidelity
Modern health care is the practice of a team. Even family registration with
primary care benefits is done with primary care facilities. No single individual can
maintain the databank of information needed to provide care. Nurses and
physicians' assistants have patients' data and observations written in the
patients' charts
which physicians should take time to read. Listed with the Professional
Regulation Commission are all health professionals who take licensure
examinations. Each field of the health profession has defined competencies,
Family Medicine specialists huVe their own competencies of things to know and
things to do which should be clear with other specialists and patients. Whatever
the assigned role, the ethics of health care requires that practitioners practice
faithfully within the constraint of their role (Edge 8: Groves, 1999).
Veracity
The family doctors should fully inform their patients and defer to the latters
option in accepting or rejecting the proposed plans of management. They must
be able to give the . diagnosis, the therapeutic management-which must be safe,
effective, With minimal ill-effects, available, and are acceptable (culturally,
religiously, or ethically)--the prognosis, and the financial implications of the
chosen management procedure. In any case of conflict between religion, culture,
and legalities, the dignity of life should prevail. The promotion and advancement
of the health of the patients should be prioritized over the perks of the
physicians and of the health product industries. Physicians should hold as sacred
and highly confidential whatever may be discovered or learned that is pertinent
to the patients even after the patients death. except when the promotion of
justice, safety, and public health requires them to act otherwise. thsicians should
be free to choose patients.