9/3/12 Aigital divide: contemporary art and new media - arforum.com / in print
vik 00 WoRDS ARTFO
bogh [ORE ADVERTISE EACKESUES CONTACTUS SUESCRIE sear
ARTOUDE OARY PICKS NENG WFRINT FLA SOOWORDS OED PREVIGNS TALMEACK ABE FOOKFORUM ASR
In PRINT ‘serreusen 2012
Digital Divide
CLARE BISHOP ON CONTEMPORARY A AND NEK MEDIA
‘SUBSORIBE
sepemer 012
woy2012
ront012
Feonay 2012
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO DIGITAL ART? Cast your mind back tothe ate 10005. uhen we got ou
fat eral scons Mas thre pease srs th tal a a> gong ‘0.
hamessing the new ser us transom our =
‘errs neve realy gained tacion— say i3
uichanne! io instaliions. Photoshopped mages, tl pis,
tutana pasted tls (wouhere beter exemplifed than n Oistian Marclay’s The oek, 2010) These
Se cbiqutovs forme, ther ormpresencefacitated bythe aecessbity and aforeabsty of aig
Cameras and eating softrare. There ae plenty of exarples ofa that makes use of Second Lie (C20
Feb creegae gies tes Manta) YuTie cps (Cr Aang. Phowe ps Ay
‘Se why do Ihave a sense thatthe appearance and content of contemporary at have been curiously
rsp th etl eae lab asus yh dtl econ’? ie
any atts use
Thaw many ely contort she queston ot aa mean ot
{eran erate! ough gta Hou any mates free el ono we
‘patene,and we are bythe Sign of ur sstence? [Sed ange hat [om aun cnne
‘Eling fuuah avesome mages of Slown-spat bodies ona touch screen oocasionaly pavsna te
nla. oom in, move on(Tousting Realty, 2012) the feneti.qabled sense offen Tecatins
ideas (uch a5 K-Coea [NOK [Seaton AJ 2000) Fach suggests the endlessly disposable, rapidly
inutale ephemera ofthe vital age and ts impact on our consumption of relationships. mages, and
Cormmuicaion; each articulates something ofthe toubing scilaion between intimacy and dsiance
‘hat characters our new technological rege, and proposes anincommensurabity between our
doggedly physiologial ives andthe sreens to which wear glued
But these exception just point up the nd. Theres, of couse, an entre sphere of"hew media at, but
‘Sete apesred Sofi ober sy eoatape eit paeten at tod para CE
CBeserncdaeueumr etree nes eric eneiect ate
Parting on canvas the "archival impulse,” analog fm, andthe fascination wth modems design and
saehtectur: fst cance none ofthese fats angearta have anthna todo wih dal madi,
{EIGury" But when we examine these dorainat forme of contemporary at mae closely ther
19444pagenu
artforum.com/inprint/issue=201207 &ispn2
‘artforum.com/inprint/issue=2012076i
Aigital divide: contemporary art and new media - artforum.com / in print
Ts subteranean presence is comparable othe rise of lesion
235 the backdrop toa of the 1000s.
n de Boer, Matinew Buckingham, Tacta
Dean, Rodney Graham, Fosand Nashasha, and Fiona Tan ae just 2 few names fom 3 eng rll cal
of ast atracted to the materialty of preigital fim and photography. Toda
lctapsione:
‘GALLERY
he gently chunking carousel of side projector or
sathout some fom of bulky, obsolet tchnolom—t
‘he whiring ofan mm or Tb-ren fm rea
paticularly the irreducion ofthe DVD
in 1007. Overight, VHS became obsolete, rendering ts oun aesthetic and prejection equpmert open
‘eo nostalgi reuse, but the older technology of celulid was and remains the favre. Today. fms sof
‘¥amth fel inimte compared wih the cola, hard dal mage. wth te excese of sual infomation
(Gach sil contains far moe deal than the human eve ould evec need) Meanwhile, numerous apps
and sotuae pogams eforlessly impersonate the anaiog witha the chore of developing and
j moves srbued withthe elegiac mood of Super 8 can now be taken on your cell phone. SO
sts ke Dean the preeninert spokesperson for
medias unquestionably seductive, but ts desrabity also arses fom the impression that tis scarce,
‘are, precious. A.igtal tm can be copied auch and cheaply, ad ingntum not soa Wem fin
‘medium may be pleashed tthe ver moment offs obstescence. Bu today tis assertion needs to
Be subject to sertiny.
‘aso seems sinking that this @scussion
Gt happen decades ago, when adeo began to supplant cebu
page 1234
contnusas
ARTOUDE | o«ARY | PS | NARS | PROT | FAL | SOOMDRDS | vIED | FREVIENS | TALKEACK [ABE | HOOKFORUM | =m
‘Alighs seme artorum com kamgke md tademan otAronum wenatorallfagazie New You, NY
319444pagenum=0
ele
229/3/12 Aigital divide: contemporary art and new media - arforum.com / in print
.» visit500 WORDS
Wi Sa a
bogh [ORE ADVERTISE EACKESUES CONTACTUS SUESCRIE eta
SOOWOROS VIDED PREVENS TALNEACK ABE SOOKFORUM SOR
re)
In PRINT ‘serreusen 2012
bee Digital Divide =
ony | cant shop Ov coERCR ATO NE VEDA exam
PIE!
&READ
cet aus sores.
Sous
aa!
rat
tse rrr reaper cD
ma ‘Siow
é
Se Ty
ee
vik Severn stare tS sci ee oe
fer Wbeos | mizqmny sini sruet Toe tor” sepa eine
\rthin the tradtonalfomat ofthe exhiitin n 2001, Lev Vanowch pesciertly observed that in
‘oregroundingtwoay communioton a= a Andamenta cara act (a coposedte the one-xay
{ow of sim or book
‘teed eame soso cd mn crobmsaictans
| ‘Manovich’s question also haunts more traditinal Seulptural|practic®S. The recent prevalence of
‘Sioilg hares Sentai ep Steed Foe
Fi senae fer ta Souler ches) wena tey nese
feed fe rsSeratets ison etpesip anaes cisco ony
Sse San sas gg tu peel St estoy Se
Se eee aes
Sout scy Gl actly aa steepest best ae
‘Sens ene ot rl fea anh Surennr se,
[Detenas ehose histones ae moderta then the more prevalent satenysinoe the 1000s has been to
‘iain the cultural tenn of the rued atta fo mvoke and sustain te usar, conostatons. and
“Thnk of Carl Bove's or Pashd Johnson's shelves of carely ranged
Inckdnacks or Pauina Obuska's copies of panings by Plsh artist ofa Srjehiska (801-1070).
‘This trend is manvestin ther Sscoines too" Poetry, theter, and danoe Nave al enacted ther own
{ams ofsesupasing i syne with visual for Elevator Repar Senice's eight-hour play Gat (utich
Uses F.SeattPtzgerad's The Grea Gatsby). to Rob Fterman's poems (epupesing ancnymous
{eats and Yelp reviews), to chard Moves eperomances ofthe modemist choreographer Martha
(Graham,
‘These fos ofreoumosina ditfs fom annroosation at ofthe 1200s,
‘xthsstony(Sheme Lewne)oradverisng (Henard Ponce) ath 2 ew fo questonna athorsp and
‘nnalty whledrasng atenton. vet agin, tothe plight ofthe image nthe age of mechanical
bul new ses fom
‘uistng components ater than eating fom soratch. tists whose werk revelves arcund chosing
bjects for dspay Gove, ohnson) or uho reuse prevous at (lowska wth Stryjehisa, Simon Sting
Moore, Ryan Gander uth Wendin
ven ae the ocare is decisively analog,
atforum.com/inprint/issue=201207 bid=31944.épagenum=t 129/3/12 Aigital divide: contemporary art and new media - arforum.com / in print
For Foster the tem denctes af that ungetakes an
\osyporate probing ito particular figures, objects, and ever in modem aft philosophy, ad history.”
(Cotten fel as if dnt listen to music so
‘uch 35 perm upkeep on my Tunes cotecton-—dowoacing new seasons. eteporzing them
and deacoessining uarted tacks.)
page 1254
contrusa»
ARTOUIDE | DARY | PCHS | NEN | IN PRINT | FM | EOWORDS | VIDED | PREVIEWS | TALIUACK | AZE | 1OOKFORUM | IER
Aight ested artim com ka mght ed tademad otArtorm i natoral Magazine, New YOR, NY
artforum.com/inprint/issue=201207 &i
)
Ail
Gavia
Brown's
enterprise
229/3/12 Aigital divide: contemporary art and new media - arforum.com / in print
art&education ARTFORUM
bogh [ORE ADVERTISE EACKESUES CONTACTUS SUESCRIE wart
ARTOUDE OARY PICKS NENG WFRINT FLA SOOWORDS OED PREVIGNS TALMEACK ABE FOOKFORUM ASR
In PRINT ‘serreusen 2012
Digital Divide
CLARE BISHOP ON CONTEMPORARY A AND NEK MEDIA
‘suse
sepemer 012
woy2012
ront012
Feonan 2012 bu Untnaen arose
sanay2012 (eva rae.
ri sot pect mae,
srowedon manes pave
- ‘Atists select and aggregate not only inthe production ofindvidual works but alsin the exhtions
s ‘they cute. nthe 1000s, this practice was reeively attuned tothe instuional context (Fred Wlson,
os “Mark fon). tin the past decade thas taken a more atomatit for, subodnaing legible or
Ke
The Problem of The Fetish, I Author(s) : William Pietz Source: RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, No. 9 (Spring, 1985), Pp. 5-17 Published By: (Ucpress) Accessed: 13-02-2017 20:37 UTC