Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#363 COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Monday, March 06, 2017 1:35:53 PM
Last Modified: Monday, March 06, 2017 2:05:24 PM
Time Spent: 00:29:30
IP Address: 216.54.92.22

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name Sonya Swartzentruber

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-6

Q3: Grade Taught Third Grade

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/09/2017

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/03/2017

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement North Landing Elementary

Q7: School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last) Cheryl Gould

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address: chergou@regent.edu

Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for? Final

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject Superior
area(s) taught.

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the Superior

age group.

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students Superior

use of higher level thinking skills.

Links content with other subject areas and real world Superior
applications.

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Sonya is a bright young educator who is fully capable of teaching the content at this grade-level or any elementary
grade-level. She is creative and brings fresh ideas to the collaborative team.

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and Superior
student learning needs.

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner Superior

needs; adapts plans as needed.

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior

transitions.

Plans for differentiated instruction. Superior

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
Lesson planning is an area of strength for Sonya. Sonya provided excellent plans. Plans are detailed and aligned with
school division objectives and Virginia Standards of Learning on a consistent basis. Sonya utilized a variety of
instructional strategies,assessment techniques (both formative & summative), as well as consideration for differentiation
of instruction for each lesson. Sonya's plans are well-developed.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Superior

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and Superior

resources.

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Superior

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Sonya provided effective instruction during my observations. She implemented student-centered activities to engage
students in learning. Sonya should vary her tone of voice, volume, and inflection to deliver a more expressive whole-
group lesson. This will better convey her passion for teaching. She appropriately adjusted her instructional volume for
small-group vs. whole group. All activities aligned with the learning objectives. She understands the components of a
high-quality lesson. She developed several assessment and learning activities using the IPad and programs such as
NearPod.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Proficient

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior

instruments

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior

purposes.

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Proficient

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
Sonya has shown professional growth in the area of assessment. She has expanded her assessment tools and types
of assessments used. She used student learning data to guide her instructional decision-making. I would like to see
Sonya have more instructional conversation with more teacher-to-student feedback as well as student-to-teacher
feedback.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Superior
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to Superior

prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Respects students diversity, including language, culture, Superior

race, gender, and special needs.

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and Superior

responses.

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
This was such a lovely group of 3rd-grade students. They were ready to learn and were eager to participate and please
the teacher. During each visit, the students were engaged in, and excited about, learning. Sonya worked well with her
cooperating teacher to maintain a positive learning culture that was established prior to her arrival. During one
observation, she maintained a perfectly quiet reading environment by keeping her voice soft and low during small-group
reading instruction. She modeled the appropriate expectation.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior
critiques.

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Exemplary

professional interactions.

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration Exemplary

with teachers and other school personnel.

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and Exemplary

ethical interactions.

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.
Sonya is a top-notched pre-service professional. She is highly reliable and is a team-player. She steps in where needed
and has created materials/resources for the benefit of the classroom and grade-level. She listens to constructive
feedback with open ears and makes every effort to adjust her instruction based on that feedback.

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the Proficient
placement.

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Proficient

Uses available data to document/communicate student Proficient

progress and develop learning targets.

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Sonya has grown in the area of documenting progress. She provided a chart showing student learning progress as well
as student samples. While there is still much to learn, she is on-track as a pre-service teacher in this area.

4/4