Integrating risk management in IT settings from ISO

standards and
management systems perspectives
1. Information technology and risk management is suitable things to
collaborate
2. We should integrate the standart of IT and risk management before
collaborate them
3. An integrated risk management approach for IT settings will benet
them by being based on ISO standards
4. The objective of this research is to investigate and compare risk
management activities throughout various selected ISO standards
5. The paper is organized be some sections
6. The Cambridge dictionary describe about harmonization and
integration
7. Harmonizing software development processes is an important
concern and mappings between processes and project settings have
been investigated from the situational factors angle.
8. Harmonizing approaches have been proposed for quality
frameworks and standards addressing Software Process
Improvement practices
9. Integrated management system has been a topic of interest in
research and industry is especially true for quality management,
environmental management and health and safety domain.
10. Some integration models and approaches have been tackled.
11. Recently, a research contribution proposed a maturity model
for an integrated management systems assessment
12. The goal Revised Standard Management System (MSS) was to
standardize the core content of management systems and to
impose the adoption of this structure to all management systems to
the rhythm of their respective revision
13. The integrative aspects of management systems, risk
management is a particular topic of great importance and interest
for organizations.
14. IT settings are commonly organized by projects, and have to
face projects risks
15. This paper intends to explore risk management in IT settings
from the angle of the following selected more relevant ISO
standards: ISO 31000 as main theme
3. Ikhtisar standar ISO ditargetkan untuk membandingkan
risiko pengelolaan
16. ISO performs every year a survey of certications to MSS.
17. The ISO 31000 standard on risk management provides
principles and generic guidelines on risk management.
18. ISO 31000 is currently being revised ISO 31000 represents a
generic standard for risk management
19. ISO 31000 is the appropriate standard candidate for driving
the comparison of risk management from a generic perspective, in
various ISO standards
20. The HLS goal is to standardize the core content of
management systems with the same structure
21. ISO Technical Management Board progressively enforces the
use of this High Level Structure to all management system
standards
22. The new version of standard ISO 9001 providing requirements
for quality management systems (QMS) has been revised
23. ISO 21500 provides guidance for project management and can
be used by any type of organization, for any type of project
24. ISO 21500 is currently an informative standard, based on
globally accepted good practices
25. The ISO/IEC 20000-1 is a service management system (SMS)
standard
26. ISO/IEC 27001 is the best-known of the ISO 27000 family of
standards providing requirements for an information security
management system (ISMS)
27. The comparison shows that many similarities exist for risk
management in the selected standards.
28. When no relation was found between a category and a
standard, no reference to this standard is made in the section.
29. Konteks manajemen risiko di semua standar
30. ISO 31000 recommends that organizations develop,
implement and continuously improve a framework
Kepemimpinan dan komitmen
31. According to ISO 31000, the introduction of risk management
and ensuring its ongoing eectiveness require strong and sustained
commitment by management of the organization
32. Plan According to ISO 31000, the risk management policy
should clearly state the organization's objectives for, and
commitment to, risk management.----describes a wide variety of
standard ISO
33. In ISO 31000, when implementing risk management, an
organization should implement the framework for managing
34. Communication and consultation, external and internal
stakeholders should take place during all stages of the risk
management process
35. By establishing the context the organization articulates its
objectives, denes the external and internal parameters to be taken
into account when managing risk
36. Risk assessment is the overall process of risk identication,
risk analysis and risk evaluation.
37. in Risk identication the organization should identify sources
of risk, areas of impacts, events and their causes and their potential
consequences
38. Risk analysis involves developing an understanding of the risk.
39. The purpose of risk evaluation is to assist in making decisions,
based on the outcomes of risk analysis
40. Risk treatment involves selecting one or more options
modifying risks, and implementing those options
41. Monitoring and review should be a planned part of the risk
management process and involve regular checking or surveillance
42. check. According to ISO 31000, in order to ensure that risk
management is eective the organization should measure risk
management performance against indicators
43. The management review shall include consideration of results
of risk assessment and status of risk treatment plan
44. Act. According to ISO 31000, decisions should be made on
how the risk management framework, policy and plan can be
improved
45. Risk management context is highly connected to the
management systems for ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 20000-1 and ISO/IEC
27001 and to the project environment in ISO 21500(manajemen
risiko sangat terhubung ke sistem manajemen untuk ISO 9001, ISO /
IEC 20000-1 dan ISO / IEC 27001 dan lingkungan proyek di ISO
21500)
46. According to ISO 9001, one of the key purposes of a
management system is to act as a preventive tool(Menurut ISO
9001, salah satu tujuan utama manajemen suatu sistem adalah
untuk bertindak sebagai alat pencegahan.)
47. Process approach and PDCA structure used in ISO 9001,
ISO/IEC 20000-1 and ISO/IEC 27001 facilitate the integration of the
dierent specic activities for planning risk
management(Pendekatan proses dan struktur PDCA digunakan
dalam ISO 9001, ISO / IEC 20000-1 dan ISO / IEC 27001
memfasilitasi integrasi erent di kegiatan yang spesik untuk
manajemen risiko perencanaan)
48. In management systems and in projects, the process approach
can drive the transversal mechanisms in order to better perform risk
management activities.( Dalam sistem manajemen dan dalam
proyek-proyek, pendekatan proses dapat mendorong mekanisme
transversal dalam rangka untuk lebih melakukan resiko kegiatan
manajemen)
Extending the comparison (memperluas perbandingan)
49. there is the strong similarities that can be found in the studied
standards and that are vectors for integration(ada kesamaan kuat
yang dapat ditemukan dalam standar dipelajari dan yang vektor
untuk integrasi)
50. to analyse systematically our main generic reference on Risk
management, elementary statements have been determined from
all statements of clauses 4 and 5 in ISO 31000.( untuk menganalisis
secara sistematis referensi generik utama kami pada Risiko
manajemen, laporan SD telah ditentukan dari semua Laporan dari
pasal 4 dan 5 di ISO 31000.)
51. According to this analysis, the SHOULD statements are
considered as the most important activities candidates for some
common activities(Menurut analisis ini, "HARUS" pernyataan
dianggap sebagai calon kegiatan yang paling penting untuk
beberapa umum kegiatan)
52. already published ISO standard with a process assessment
model based on the ISO/IEC 27001 that make common processes for
management system standards provide some inputs on groupings.(
sudah diterbitkan standar ISO dengan model penilaian proses
berdasarkan ISO / IEC 27001 yang membuat proses umum untuk
standar sistem manajemen memberikan beberapa masukan tentang
pengelompokan.)
53. Processes and PDCA method foster interoperability with a
systemic approach: the activities of the processes throughout their
inputs and outputs are inter-operating.( Proses dan metode PDCA
asuh interoperabilitas dengan sistemik Pendekatan: kegiatan proses
seluruh masukan dan output antar-operasi.)
Dalam makalah ini kami menyajikan perbandingan bagaimana
manajemen risiko adalah
ditangani dalam beberapa standar ISO (ISO 31000, HLS, ISO 9001,
ISO
21500, ISO / IC 20000-1 dan ISO / IEC 27001) yang dapat digunakan
dalam
IT pengaturan dengan sistem manajemen dan bagaimana
perbandingan ini dapat
diperpanjang untuk karya penelitian lebih lanjut. Perbandingan ini
memberikan kontribusi untuk
eksplorasi bagaimana Manajemen Risiko dapat diintegrasikan
sedemikian
konteks. Beberapa aspek sistem manajemen (s) adalah integrasi
vektor seperti pemahaman organisasi dan konteksnya,
berbasis risiko berpikir, kepemimpinan dan komitmen, pendekatan
proses
dan struktur PDCA.
Mengingat integrasi sistem manajemen yang disebutkan di atas
vektor, kami percaya bahwa kemampuan organisasi dalam
perusahaan dengan
Pengaturan IT dapat diperkuat oleh manajemen risiko yang
terintegrasi
proses atau serangkaian proses, berdasarkan standar ISO seperti
yang dibandingkan dalam makalah ini. Standar yang dipilih adalah
sukarela
terbatas karena ada empiris dianggap sebagai yang paling
signikan
dalam pengaturan IT, seperti yang ditelusuri kembali oleh praktisi
untuk penulis. Sebuah
proses manajemen risiko yang terintegrasi atau set proses dapat
dijelaskan pada cara yang sangat terstruktur memungkinkan proses
penilaian
terhadap kerangka pengukuran kemampuan dan proses
memfasilitasi
perbaikan. Dalam konteks ini penulis bermaksud untuk
mengembangkan proses
referensi model dan model proses penilaian (persyaratan
memuaskan
ISO / IEC 33004 standar [47]) yang didedikasikan untuk manajemen
risiko,
tapi disesuaikan dengan berbagai standar ISO yang dipilih, untuk
menyediakan
pendekatan manajemen risiko terpusat dan terintegrasi dengan
perbaikan,
koordinasi dan interoperabilitas karakteristik. Hal ini memungkinkan
penilaian proses dan perbaikan di mana manajemen, denisi
dan penyebaran, pengukuran dan perbaikan terus-menerus
ditangani
dengan. Oleh karena itu akan memungkinkan mengintegrasikan
manajemen risiko di IT pengaturan dengan
manajemen sistemik kualitas, proyek, layanan TI dan informasi
keamanan seperti ditangani oleh standar ISO yang berkaitan
dengan disiplin ilmu ini di
kertas. standar ISO lain seperti ISO / IEC 12207 dan ISO / IEC
15.288, dan ISO / IEC 27005 dapat dipertimbangkan, tetapi lingkup
Pertanyaan penelitian terbatas pada standar ISO, sistem
manajemen
konteks dan pendekatan PDCA akan tetap driver utama.
Tujuan kami adalah untuk mengembangkan generik (untuk semua
organisasi TI yang
memenuhi kami denisi dari IT pengaturan) perbaikan proses
manajemen risiko
model yang bisa, di masa depan, disesuaikan dengan sifat
spesik IT pengaturan dalam konteks tertentu. Hasil yang disajikan
dalam
kertas merupakan langkah pertama menuju pengembangan model
proses manajemen risiko, yang akan memudahkan penilaian dan
perbaikan
risiko kegiatan manajemen dalam pengaturan IT. berbagai kasus
Studi akan dilakukan di masa depan, berkat kerjasama dengan
IT pengaturan di sektor erent di dengan ukuran beragam, tingkat
manajemen
kematangan sistem dan visi manajemen risiko. Pintu untuk
manajemen risiko yang terintegrasi dengan sistem manajemen
lainnya
domain dari IT juga dapat dibuka karena kami sudah mengatasi
sangat
populer standar ISO 9001 dan ISO 21500 menjanjikan satu di
Manajemen proyek.