4. Getting your sources right
What Aristotle didn’t say
James Edwin Mahon
Introduction and overview
As atlas ne intuential writer on metaphor has pointed oat ~ and
there ae few who woul disagree wth um ies ll theca hat
‘Any serious sudy of metaphor is slmost obliged to stare withthe
works of Aristotle” (Ortony, 19794: 3, Most studies of metspho
Howerey have scarcely good word to ay about Avstote. The
cblgstion to discuss him i considered to be something af a chore
Such studies always ina that Ariel underaiued metaphor and
Bebeved sto be mecely an ornamental extra in language. They alo
insist that he was edulouly elise with respect 40 metaphor,
beliving that one had to be a genus in ander to use & metaphor
propel. Party as acsut of ths prevaling negative appraisal the
Echolarahip contaed in these staies tens ra be sather sallow
Shee Ate sono of eps finden won.
trews, or in consulting ore that one of the tess it which be
cose meraphor
‘Shallow schlatship about ich and important sous of work on
metaphor and language use; howeves con impovecsh andy a
swore seriously iss empirical research on the topic. MoveaveR,
feting your soacces right i aoe meray 9 valuble eed in lft
Inay lo lead tothe discovery of insights which support the clans of
sour cacen esearch, or even tothe develops of new aeas foe
oor ential nvesupatign In thy esayT wane fo atgve that amore
“stale examination of Arist’ wetngs on metaphor lds bh
‘ofthese happy results, Aristo tus us, 208 a position onthe
Ubiguty of metaphor in comecsation and wing Which supports
arent views about the ompreseace of Wetaphor in everyday
lacourse snd she rit sud What he ha 58) about how people
an expres themselves ina clear aed move aetacive way theo
fhe ute of metaphors is aso extremely zlevaat to the concer of
°70 James Edwin Mabon
contemporary theotsts grappling with the problem of Language
teaching and learning since seis Aristotle’ view chat people actually
learn and understand things beter though metaphors. Furthermore,
his account of metaphor includes a distinction berween the coimage
‘fa metaphor and the usage ofa metaphor, one which allows forthe
‘Ubiquity of metaphors in common discourse, without downplaying
fhe aspect of human creatvigy involved in the creation of new
metaphors, This i a distinction which, I chink, should be taken on
board by fare researchers. Finally, shall remind theocists chat
Aristotle was the Bt to Argue for an ently nara origin of trae
Ueerary genius, and that sm this respect his natucalistic aesthetic
theory was 4 revolutionary one, breaking with «long, elds, ant
naturalistic tradition of theorising about literary genius. Since
Arisole largely identified lierary genius with che abiity to coin
marvelous new metaphors, ic follows chat Aristotle was she fst to
fee for an entirely natural origin of metapac coinage. The face hat
he was abe to do this withowe abandoning or downplaying literary
talent should be taken into account by those curently engaged 1a
esearch on language who tend to overlook the plain face of iterary
tenis thei pursit ofa more egalitarian account of metaphoe
Aristotle on metaphor in the Poetics
Aristotle’ discussion of metaphor in the Poetics is t0 be found in
CChaptees 21 and 22. In Chapter 2t Arinztle states that every word
“is ether currant or strange of metaphorical, or ornamental, oF
snewipreoined of lengghened, or contracted, or stewed" (21> 1457;
Butcher, i Naf» Ed. 1950: 27%), The wems current and strange
refer tothe commonness of a word in the watings and conversation
‘of a people; lengthened, contracted or altered rier to modifications
rade to words in Greek; and nevly-coined eles to newly coined
‘words (and not to new combinations of words). Although thee i no
Separate explanation piven of omamental ic should be noted that
the omamental is diffeentzced from the metaphorical. The overall
importance of including metaphors ia this lis, however, that
* Rese Ado eae om satin by MC, uch Sa
(0950 The eced eh Bacher tana che he Soe cooly
‘ere bye toy and pe se ow ao
‘Senne math ater a pane ener
ie O05 whet en eens myc wns sgh
taeda passenger
Getting your sourcesright 71
Arstoule appears to classify metaphors a lying outside noemal
language ose
‘Nistor defines metaphor as the application of an alien name by
transference either from genus to species Or Om species #0 es, OF
feom species t0 species, by analogy, that is, proporsion” (21
1437, Butcher p. 28). Since “Iying at anchor’ tsa species of the
ens “lying, ofe can say ‘There lies my ship’ (genus-to-species
metaphor) Since ten thousand’ isa species ofa “large number one
an say Verily ten thousand noble deeds hath Odysseus wrought
(speciv-o-genus metaphor) Since Yo draw away” and "a cleave” are
tach a species of the genes taking away’ one can say with blade of
bronze drew away the life (speciesto-species metaphor), And since
lage oto fe as evening 1 co day, one can say that old age isthe
evening of life (analogy metaphor) (21: 1457b; Butcher p, 28). Al
‘metaphors, Aristotle believes, fall imo at least one of these four
Categories although analogy metaphors are the most plensing-
“This actoont of metaphor fs known as tbe comparison theory of
metaphor Some contemporary Writes on metaphor sill accept ris
fsecount? most, however, do net — at least poe withoue many
Gualifations, However, it nor my intention here to defend the
SSmparison theewy of metaphor against all other contenders. As it
Sona, Arsttles account #8, i general outline, quite cose to the
‘common-sensical understanding of metaphor and tt slices forthe
purposes of my essay that he i obviously discussing what we would
ko call metaphog even ifthe comparison theory is applicable 10
‘nly limited tumiber of cases Ie is the chapter ofthe Poeties which
follows this one, whece Aristo elaborates on how metaphors sre
unusual, and discusses the relationship benmeen metaphor and
penius, which is considered 10 be che more controversial part of bis
[ccount. This the part of the Poetics on which will focus.
Tn Chaptcr 22 Arstotte argues tha the best writing syle i chat,
which is leas but which comeains a cerain amount of unvsual
word By unusual, Anstotle says mean strange (or rare) words,
Imetaphortal, eagthened, ~ anything, in shor, that differs from the
hhoraal iliom” (22: L458; Butcher p- 28). Just as itis importa to
rou! a stjle which is perfectly clear but mean ~ that Jy style
Composed entirely of current of proper" 22: 145Ra; Butcher p; 29)
Words s0 109 is imporcant 10 avotd a style composed entirely of
Uinusnal words A syle consposed ential of metaphors, for example,
would bea "riddle" (22:,14582; Bucher p. 29). Thus a certain
Tnfusion of unusual words “will ise i above the commonplace and
» Ss loexenle Sten omg 1990 laa Metaphor: cond Metpbor72 James Edwin Mahon
snc, while she ase of proper words wil make i pespicuous" (2
4385 Bucher p29) Al unaeal mond, ower, Amol a
‘ion mi be employed with propre in is Cnet that he
sakes his'most famous atbent about the wlaonhip erween
sseaphor sad pei
trina grat mater me props hee rl ads fapesion
“Sound wont wage orm) word and fa, babe peste
‘ne pe pete let esghos Tse camer
‘raed by enter ibe mk anor le pod meaphor
‘piesa jeer amilaces (Powe 2 1458 Buber
‘This is the extent of the account of metaphor given inthe Poetic
Despite itt revit probably he mot nue account
ofrmerapor ever provide.
‘The comrovesy over the accoun centres on a last for claims
concerning metaphor which are aebted Arion the as ot
thew sane in the Pow. The ise that, according 0
‘Amo metaphors le oie normal Iangge ve They are
devant or aberrant form of couse, The soni that mcaphrs
‘ive no cog value and are considered tobe merely decorative
crim, As Orony (197%. 3} sayy "Ay to the use, (Anode)
‘lieved that twas etely ornamental. Metabo nother words
set meen, they are jr nice” THe hid aie rh
‘eraphor do mot posts clarity, As Hawker ptt, writing abst
‘Rist aecout of metaphor
‘asin Cle las ett ite epee pri an