Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION:
Micronutrient deficiencies are widespread in many devel- December 2011 to December 2012 at the Kendriya Vidy-
oping countries and are common among young persons alaya No.1, and Goverment Primary school by the De-
hailing from low socioeconomic groups. Iron and Zinc partment of Pediatrics, Dr. S. N. Medical college, Jodhpur.
are essential nutrient not only for the normal growth, Permission was obtained from the Assistant commission-
health, and survival of children but also for their normal er, Regional Office, Jaipur; and Principals of Kendriya
mental and motor development and cognitive function- Vidyalaya No.1 & Goverment Primary school . This study
ing. Deficiency is associated with significantly poorer was approved by the college Ethical Committee. Written
performance on psychomotor and mental development informed consent was taken from the parents of children
scales and behavioral ratings in infants, lower scores on who participated in the study.
cognitive function tests and lower educational achieve- Randomly selected children of both sexes in the age group
ment tests in preschool and school age children [1]. of 6 to 11 years were enrolled for the study and subject-
There are scanty data available regarding behavioral & ed to memory assessment and hematological tests. Chil-
cognitive changes occurring due to Fe or Zn or combined dren with infection, fever, history of drug intake for any
deficiency & no such study done in Western Rajasthan. illness and girls who had attained menarche were exclud-
So, this study was undertaken with the objective of identi- ed. Body weight of children without shoes (by bathroom
fying the role of Iron, Zinc and Combined deficiency( Fe scale with weighed to the nearest 100g) and height of
& Zn) on verbal and nonverbal spheres of memory , and children standing erect without shoes on the stadiometer
to find out the difference in affectation of various spheres were taken.
of memory in deficient children & assess the response of General physical and systemic examination was done to
supplementation therapy in the deficient children. find out any abnormal finding in any system. They were
MATERIAL & METHODS: grouped into 6-8 years (Group A; n=34) and 9-11 years
This study was a cross-sectional, community based, inter- (Group B; n=67). Further sub grouping was done based
ventional study. It was conducted during the period from on levels of Iron and Zinc. hemoglobin estimation is done
*Corresponding author: doi: 10.15272/ajbps.v5i42.664
Dr.Rakesh Jora
Regional Institute of Maternal and Child Health,Umaid Hospital for Women and Children, Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Email-: jorarakesh@gmail.com
Conflict of interest: Authors reported none
by Automated hematology analyzer analyzer, Serum Iron to score out the As and Es within a period of 2 minutes. If
and Serum Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) by colo- the child has omitted to score a letter or if he/she has scored
rimetric method, and Serum Zinc by Atomic absorption a letter which is not A or E, it is considered as a wrong. If
spectrophotometry. Based on Serum Iron levels, Total Iron the child has correctly struck out an A or E it is considered
Binding Capacity (TIBC) and Serum Zinc levels, Group A as right. The final score is obtained by subtracting the total
(6-8 years; n=34 ) and Group B ( 9-11 years ; n=67 ) cate- of wrongs from the totals of rights.
gorized into 4 sub-groups: Deficient children were given the Iron/Zinc supplements
Group 1: Iron deficient serum iron <60 meq/dL, TIBC > depending on the element in which they are deficient: Syp
360 and serum zinc >65 mcg/ dL) and Iron (ferrous ascorbate) - 2 mg/kg/day, Zinc - 5 mg once-a-
Group 2: Zinc deficient (serum iron > 60 mcg/dL, TIBC < day in the form of syrup given for 3 months. Children who
360 and serum zinc <65 mcg/dL). were deficient in both the minerals were also given both
Group 3: Combined deficient: Those with values sugges- Fe & Zn for a period of 3 months. The normal children
tive of iron and zinc deficiency, were advised nutritious food during the study period & no
Group 4: Normal: Children with normal values of Iron & intervention was done. All memory tests will be repeated
Zinc. after three months supplementation of required minerals.
TESTS FOR MEMORY & CONCENTRATION Due to drop outs, only 101 students continued in the study.
The tests were administered to each child in a quiet room. Statistical Methods:
The environment was comfortable and free of distraction. The Data was analyzed with the help of Microsoft Excel
Instructions were given to the children according to a 2007, statistical software STAT PACK version 3.0 .The
pre-prepared standard protocol. Five tests were selected, statistical analysis was performed by using students t test
which were generated from different sources [2], including and Chi squire test to find out the significance of difference
Wechsler memory scale, Mini mental state examination, in mean between two variables. One way ANOVA (Anal-
Binet-Kamath scale and Cattels retentivity test, as de- ysis of Variance: Single Factor) was done to compare the
scribed below. effects of the nutritional intervention and improvement in
(1) Digit span: This test is taken from Wechsler Intelligence memory score in different spheres after supplementation
scale for Children Revised (WISC-R). This comprises of between groups. Continuous data of sample were summa-
span for digit forward and backward. The subject was re- rized as mean SD and and categorical data of the sample
quired to repeat a series of numbers called by the research- were presented as proportion or percentage.
er and the difficulty level increased after each successful RESULTS:
answer. Each correct answer was given a score, which was Out of 101 children, 18.7 % children were deficient in Fe
summed for the final score. The maximum number of dig- while Zn deficiency was seen in 12.8 % cases . Prevalence
its used in the series is limited to 9. This test is a measure of Combined deficiency was 3.9% . In both Group A &
of attention , short term memory and auditory sequencing. Group B, Fe deficiency was 20.6% & 11.9% , followed by
a. Digit forward: The subject is instructed to recite digit se- zinc deficiency in 11.8% &7.5% and combined deficiency
quences of increasing length in the order presented. in 5.9% & 3.0% cases respectively. Zinc deficiency & com-
b. Digit backward: The subject is instructed to recite digit bined deficiency ( Fe & Zn) were more common in males
sequences of increasing length in the reverse order. while Fe deficiency was having female preponderance (M
(2)Vocabulary test: This subtest includes 10 unfamiliar :F= 1:1.5). There was non - significant improvement in
words given to the subjects and instructed to recall them. anthropometric measurements after supplementation i.e.
This test is a measure of verbal memory. weight, height and BMI in all deficiencies group i.e. Fe de-
(3) Benton visual retention test: This test is designed to as- ficiency, Zn deficiency and combined deficiency as well as
sess visual perception, visual memory and visual-construc- in control.
tive abilities. There are 10 cards. Each card is exposed for Verbal and Non- Verbal aspects of memory was affected in
10 seconds and the child is asked to reproduce the design both age groups due to deficiency of Iron and Zinc. Verbal
from memory. This test measures the visual spatial percep- memory and Concentration showed statistically signifi-
tion, visual and verbal conceptualization and immediate cantly affection in the 6-8 years age group.
memory span. Significant affectation of Verbal, Non - Verbal memory and
(4)Cattells retentivity test: It consists of complex and un- Concentration was seen in 9-11 years age group [Table 1].
familiar designs of irregular geometric figures which can- In 6 8 yr age group, Verbal memory is mainly affected in
not elicit any verbal associations. On a card 10 geometrical Fe deficiency which was improved after supplementation
figures are presented for 30 seconds, after a 2 minute pause & significant improvement was also seen after combined
and from the second card the child has to recognize the supplementation of Fe & Zn in Combined deficient group.
geometrical figures which he has already seen in the first While In 9 11 yr age group, Zinc deficiency mainly affects
card. This measures the visual recall for irregular geomet- the verbal memory which was improved significantly after
rical designs and delayed memory span. zinc supplementation [Table 2]. Non-verbal memory was
(5)Letter cancellation test: This test is a measure of con- mainly affected in 9-11 years of age group by deficiency
centration .The children are given the test which has many of Iron, Zinc and their combined deficiency, the greater in
alphabets typed out in rows and the children are instructed the combined deficient group & improved significantly af-
Page 13 Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015.
Rakesh Jora et al: Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmacutical Sciences, 5(42), 2015, 12-15.
ter supplementation of deficient micronutrient [Table 2]. an important tool for a good academic performance and
Concentration scores were improved significantly in both plays an important role in modifying the childs potential
age groups after supplementation of deficient micronutri- for learning, which influences behavior.
ents [Table2]. Tests of verbal memory assess the immediate verbal mem-
DISCUSSION ory
The age for cultivating inspiration and wisdom is from 6-8 After supplementation of deficient micronutrient for 3
years, and 9-11 years is considered to be important in the months, 6-8 years age group showed marked improvement,
formative process and reasoning. This is the reason for the particularly in the combined deficiency group, suggesting
focus of our study in this particular age group. Memory is a greater tendency to revert to the normal growth. A study
Group A (6-8 Yr) (1)Iron (2)Zinc (3)Combined Defi- (4)Control p- Value
Deficiency Deficiency ciency [ n = 21 ]
[n= 7 ] [ n =4] [ n =2]
Verbal Memory 11.75 2.71 8.8 2.95 7.5 0.71 11.40 1.99 < 0.01
Non-Verbal Memory 15 2.88 15 3.08 10.5 0.71 15.75 1.57 < 0.01
Concentration 28.87 1.88 25 5.66 22 12.73 28.79 2.14 <0.05
Table 1: Memory Scores in Different Groups before Supplementation
*Significance by One way ANOVA test: all values are in Mean SEM
Verbal Memory 0.25 1.38 3.4 2.5 1 1.41 0.75 2.13 <0.05
Non-Verbal Memory 2.62 2.92 2.8 3.03 4.5 2.12 0.36 1.64 <0.0001
Concentration 2.12 1.88 5.2 5.02 5 7.07 1.23 2.17 <0.001