Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Allison Kostiuk
Emily Aldred
Brendan Clark
Sara Martin
ETEC 500
Group Assignment 2
University of British Columbia
Professor Ercikan
April 3, 2016
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
2
Abstract
This study examines the concept of the Digital Divide in the context of British
Columbia and western Canada. Rural and Indigenous educational settings do not often have the
(Assembly of First Nations, 2012). The main contributing factors in the implementation of
technology within Aboriginal and rural communities include connectivity, hardware, skills, and
access (Beaton, Carpenter, & KNET.,2014; Looker and Thiessen, 2003; Kimery &
Amirkhalkhali, 2011; Kawaliak, Wells, Connell, & Beamer (2012); Voice, 2006). A
mixed-methods approach will be used to collect quantitative survey data as well as qualitative
interview data which relates to these contributing factors and barriers to implementing
technology. The conclusions of this research study will focus on the experiences shared by
interview subjects which will broaden our understanding of the barriers to technology in these
settings, the challenges faced by the educators operating in these systems, and some local
The purpose of this study is to examine and describe the challenges schools face when
implementing technology in Aboriginal and rural communities. The objectives of this study are
to determine and understand the specific challenges Aboriginal and rural communities face;
which communities face the greatest challenges; and the solutions, if any, these communities
have established to circumvent the hurdles associated with the implementation of technology.
This is valuable and significant research, as 28% of Canadas Aboriginal population is aged 14
and under (Macdonald and Vieira ). Understanding that the fastest growing population of
Canada, and non-indigenous students in rural communities, need to have access to reliable
technology and support in the classroom will ensure that they are more likely and able to be
contributing citizens, which benefits all Canadians. This research will help aid government and
Aboriginal policy makers in fund and support allocation as well as educational curriculum
design.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
4
Perspectives
Many areas in Western Canada have steady and reliable access to technology; however,
within Aboriginal and rural communities in Western Canada many challenges exist. The
Assembly of First Nations in 2012 found that only 48% of First Nations schools have fully
equipped technology, and only 67% report good connectivity (p. 3-4). The main contributing
factors in the implementation of technology within Aboriginal and rural communities include
connectivity, hardware, skills and access (Beaton, Carpenter, & KNET.,2014; Looker and
Thiessen, 2003; Kimery & Amirkhalkhali, 2011; Kawaliak, Wells, Connell, & Beamer (2012);
Voice, 2006).
Offering steady and reliable Internet connection to rural areas is expensive; therefore
service and connection is limited which makes the implementation of technology difficult. In
some Aboriginal communities, it is noted that the amount of funding received in local schools
does not match that of current educational costs, such as teacher salaries, school supplies and
equipment (Assembly of First Nations, 2012). While not every Aboriginal or rural community
share the same issues, many experience under funding and poor facilities that ultimately affect
the overall implementation of technology in these communities (Beaton and Carpenter, 2014;
Looker and Thiessen, 2003). Another factor that contributes negatively to the implementation of
technology in Aboriginal or rural communities is the lack of support available. In remote rural
areas assistance or support is available, however it is often on a very part time basis. Not only is
technology support unavailable at all times, teachers also lack the appropriate technical training
due to financial and geographical reasons, many government initiatives are being formed to
create more equitable access to all areas of Canada (Kimery and Amirkhalkhali, 2011). Federal
Programs such as, Community Access Program, SchoolNet and BRAND play an important role
Description of Methods
This study will use a mixed methods research approach by integrating an explanatory
sequential design. The project will begin with the collection and analysis of quantitative data
obtained through a survey sent out to participants. These data will provide guidance to the
researchers by identifying a subset of the population of which to obtain the next phase of
qualitative data. The second set of data will be acquired through interviews conducted by the
researchers. By implementing interviews into the research project, researchers will be able to
delve into the thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions of the participants in regards to the research
topic (Mertler, 2016, p. 152). These qualitative data will then be analyzed and interpreted in
terms of describing the quantitative results obtained in the first phase of data collection (Mertler,
2016).
The population in this study will consist of schools identified as an Aboriginal or rural
school in British Columbia. This population is identified through the BC Rural & Multigrade
websites. Depending on the resulting population numbers, participants available, and results,
researchers may choose to identify these same populations in the western Canadian provinces of
Researchers will develop one cross-sectional survey through the online platform, Survey
Monkey. A survey invitation will be sent out electronically by e-mail to the population identified
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
7
above. The survey invitation will inform potential participants of the purpose of this study and
that their answers will remain anonymous on the research report. This survey will be open to
access for a time period of two weeks. After one week, a reminder email will be sent to potential
participants. Survey questions will gather demographic information using a nominal scale to
identify school location by district, Aboriginal designation, job title, and grade level. Attitudinal
and behavioural questions will also be incorporated into the survey using an ordinal scale to
measure participants own feelings about technology, perceived feelings of other school
employees towards technology, how technology is used in the school, and what technology is
used in the school. Post survey, participants will be asked to give their contact information so
that researchers are able to potentially contact participants after data analysis to request an
The research team will perform all interviews using the same interview guide. This guide
will serve as a semi-structured interview for the researchers to conduct. Interview questions will
be developed as a result of the review and analysis of the quantitative data gathered from the
survey. Due to varying locations of researchers and participants, interviews will be conducted
will be recorded for researchers to analyze after phase two of the study is complete.
Participation will be sought through e-mail communications firstly with school principals
and then, with principal permission, e-mailed to employees of each identified school. The survey
will have a two week deadline. Data will be collected, analyzed, and organized to begin phase
two in the following month. Interviews will be conducted over another months time. This data
will be analyzed and compared to data from phase one. Results will be drawn and outlined over
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
8
the following weeks. The total amount of time to conduct this study will occur over one
Data for this study will be collected from participants in both quantitative (survey) and
qualitative (interview) forms. Initial data analyses of quantitative data obtained in phase one will
be used to identify a subset of the participant population to interview in phase two. The survey
platform, Survey Monkey, will collect quantitative data to identify the participants, their
demographics, as well as their attitudes and behaviours towards technology at their school. All
data will be stored electronically on the Survey Monkey platform. Once the two week period of
the survey is up and all data is collected it will be analyzed by the research team. Participants
will be organized into Aboriginal and rural subgroups, and then further categorized by location
within these subgroups. Researchers will determine possible interview candidates by identifying
at least one technology struggling school from each school district or region in the province for
both Aboriginal schools and rural schools. Potential interview candidates will be contacted by
e-mail to arrange a time for researchers to conduct the interview. This process will occur over the
course of one month. Using recordings of these interviews, researchers will analyze the
responses and draw more concrete conclusions of the quantitative results obtained in phase one.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
10
Results
The results of this study will consist of quantitative and qualitative data. Survey data
from the initial phase of the study will help determine the rural and Indigenous schools which
will be the focus for the second phase of data collection. We expect that the survey data will
reveal a large sample of educators and institutions which are affected by geography and policy
which negatively impacts their access to information technology. The survey data will help
describe the sample and the various cultures and histories which are present in the represented
population. The second phase of the study consists of qualitative data collection through
interviews. The results of the interview phase will help begin to create a detailed description of
how barriers and beliefs around technology play out in a variety of settings, as explained by
individuals who play key roles in these educational environments. Looker & Thiessen (2003) and
The Assembly of First Nations (2012) suggest funding, access to support, and political policy, as
main sources of the digital divide in rural populations. Because colonial policy has played out in
each unique indigenous culture in a different way, we expect to uncover a greater depth of
qualitative data through interviews which will uncover important themes and lessons. Comparing
the issues found in rural non-indigenous schools to Aboriginal schools may also reveal issues in
Educational Significance
Our results will allow scholars to compare theories and data with lived experience. The
results of this study will be useful for scholars investigating the use of technology in Indigenous
and rural settings and those contributing to the larger topic of the Digital Divide. Researchers
have found quantifiable data regarding technology use in Aboriginal and rural educational
settings (Assembly of First Nations, 2012, Looker & Thiessen, 2003) and some indigenous
scholars have argued for some caution when these unique communities attempt to create
knowledge and culture through digital means (Bowers, Vasquez & Roaf, 2000). The data
collected in this study will help scholars uncover connections and themes that emerge between
various Indigenous uses and attitudes towards technology and public policy, infrastructure and
geography.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
12
References
Assembly of First Nations. (2012). A Portrait of First Nations and Education. Chiefs Assembly
Beaton, B., Carpenter, P., & KNET, K. O. (2014, May). A critical understanding of adult
(ICT) in remote First Nations. In annual meeting of the Canadian Association for Study
Bowers, C.A., Vasquez, M., and Roaf, M. (2000). Native People and the Challenge of
Kawalilak, C., Wells, N., Connell, L., & Beamer, K. (2012). E-Learning Access, Opportunities,
and Challenges for Aboriginal Adult Learners Located in Rural Communities. College
Kimery, K. M., & Amirkhalkhali, S. (2011). Information and communication technologies and
Looker, Diane and Victor Thiessen. (2003) The digital divide in Canadian schools: factors
affecting student access to and use of information technology. Research Data Centre.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN ABORIGINAL AND RURAL
SCHOOLS
13
Macdonald, A. & Vieira, P. (2015, April) Canadas Aboriginal Population: Growing, but
http://blogs.wsj.com/canadarealtime/2015/04/20/canadas-aboriginal-population-growing-
but-troubled/
Smith, C., & Wobst, H. M. (2005). Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonizing theory and practice.
http://lib.myilibrary.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/Open.aspx?id=25622
Voice, A., desLibris - Documents, KTA Centre for Collaborative Government Staff, & Crossing