Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The NEO PI-R is one of the IPIP scales that is discover by Paul T. Costa, Jr. and Robert
R. McCrae. According to International Personality Item Pool (2016), initially Raymond Cattell, a
British Psychologist had develop a 16 different scale of personality questionnaire, 16PF, but after
Costa and McCrae figure out 16PF is redundant, they started to conduct a research based on
16PF and discover three domain of personality which is Neuroticism, Extraversion, and
Openness to Experience. After that, they form their own original personality inventory (NEO PI)
to analyze the three factors. They started to add Agreeableness and Conscientiousness as the five
domain personality after the inspiration of the Big 5 talk by Jack Digman, a colleague of Lew
Goldberg and renamed their instrument as the NEO Personality Inventory- Revised (NEO PI-R).
Costa and McCrae started to compare the NEO PI-R with other major personality questionnaires
and discovered that Five Factor Model (FFM) also can be found in nearly all personality
instruments. As a result, FFM is now recognizing as the key standard for personality assessment.
The NEO PI-R is a set of questionnaire that mainly used to measure ones personality based on
Five Factor Model (FFM). This test is able to measure ones emotion, their interpersonal skill,
willingness to experience new things, attitude and motivational style (McCrae & John, 1992).
For example, the person who is high in Neuroticism is more likely to have an unstable emotion
where they can easily get stress and bad mood. Based on the information above, NEO PI-R also
can used to apply in most of the industry because it able to measure Clients job abilities and
Even though method of administer is in the form of group test, but it also can be
individual because the instruction and the question of the test is quite clear and comprehendible
(Ralph L, 2001). IPIP NEO-PI-R is available in two version, which is Form S and Form R.
According to PAR (2012), Form S is self-reported which is more suitable for adults while Form
R is an observer reports measure and it is written in the third person for peer, spouse, or expert
ratings. There has no time limits for the employees to answer the entire question but it takes
about 30 minutes for individuals to complete the test. Employees and complete IPIP NEO-PI-R
in online form, booklets, hand scoring answer sheets and the computer software (NEO Software
NEO-PI-R contains 240 questions, which consists of five domain subscales and each with
six facets. According to Ralph (2001), there are total of thirty facets in the NEO PI-R test that
provide more specific and greater understanding to the employees. The Neuroticism with six
distress. Extraversion with six facets, which is warmth, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity,
excitement seeking, and positive emotions is to measure the quantity and intensity of the
employee interpersonal interactions in the social world (Ralph, 2001). Moreover, Openness to
Experience refers to the proactive seeking and appreciation of experiences for themselves. The
facets in Openness to Experience is fantasy, aesthetics, feelings, actions, ideas, and values. In
interactions along a range from sympathy to hostility (Ralph, 2001). The last domain is
Conscientiousness, which used to measure the degree of organization, persistence, control, and
Reliability is to measures some characteristic to get the consistent results over time. The
NEO PI-R Manual with 1539 adults aged 21-64 have coefficient alphas (.56-.81) for Form S
domains and facets; internal consistency data in Form S with 132 college students (84 males) is .
50-.87, and the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project Form R of the NEO-PI-R with total
12,156 respondents range from .50-.82. This shows that the three samples are consistent. In
addition, alpha is lowest (< .70) for Self-Consciousness, Activity, Openness to Actions and
Values, and Tender-Mindedness; alpha is highest ( .75) for Angry Hostility, Vulnerability,
Openness to Aesthetics and Ideas, Trust, and Self-Discipline (McCrae, Kurtz, Yamagata &
Terracciano, 2010). However, internal consistency does not shows too much difference by
Validity of NEO PI-R is refers to the accuracy of the personality assessment. According to Costa
and McCrae (1992), convergent validity is to measure the relationship between NEO-PI-R facet
scales with alternative measures of similar constructs (as cited in Costa, 1996). For example, the
facet of Neuroticism, which is depression, related to the measure of Stress index in JobMatch
Talent test. Content validity means the degree of the test covers the content that it is supposed to
measure (Yaghmaei, 2003). The Content validity needs to be complete by an expert such as I/O
questionnaires derived from a literature is different from the I/O literature (Costa, 1996). For
example, Schmit stated that the requirement for a particular job related to the dimension in FFM,
which is Trustworthiness with Information or Cooperative Helping Tendencies (as cited in Costa,
1996). The former is relating to Conscientiousness and the latter is relating to Agreeableness, but
if they are not being identify and measure they will be ignore in the selection process. Therefore,
the 30 facets of the NEO-PI-R should cover many traits of interest to I/O psychologists (Costa,
1996).
Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality is the theory that dominates in NEO PI-R
personality assessment. This theory able to explain a natural framework for organizing research
Therefore, this theory described as a set of tool that helped most of the psychologist in distinctive
area to conduct a personality research. The five dimensions in Five Factor Model is include
may be carrying out different meaning. For example, the person who is low in neuroticism does
not mean that they always have a positive thinking but it is also reflects that the person is
relaxed, unflappable, even-tempered and calm (McCrae & John, 1992). Therefore, the NEO PI-R
is using the FFM theory in order to understand the person personality effectively.
Practical
The NEO PI-R is the personality tests that can be apply in the work environment
especially in the recruitment process. As Costa, McCrae, kay (1995) had mentioned that
personality traits is the common way to understand a persons life which include their occupation
preference, career choices and job performance. By referring to the outcome of the personality
test, it can help to identify whether a persons is suitable to that particular occupation or not.
Taking an example, salespersons often require a person who is extravert. This is because they
must have the ability to cope with the external world and enjoyed being with people. To be a
salesperson, they need to communicate well with other people, as they need to seek for customer
to sale their product. Garcia, Nima, Rappe, Rapp Ricciardi, Archer (2014), noted that manager
and human resource expert had describe the significant characteristics which can relate to the job
performance such as stress tolerance, persistence, self-control, ability to cooperate and take
initiative and willingness to listen. When ones personality match with their job, simultaneously
it will also influence their job performance. This statement can be proof by using the research
from Holland, Johnston, Hughey, and Asama (as cited in Costa, 1996) where they have point out
individuals who score high in Openness to Experience will be more successful in work that need
to have original thinking. For example, a creative person most probably will be successful in
designing career path. Hence, the development of NEO PI-R is mainly use in business settings.
The advantages of using NEO PI-R is that it is a useful instrument to measure the
personality. According to PAR (2012), NEO-PI-R can be a precious resource for the experts
because it provides a detailed personality description with six facets in each domain. NEO-PI-R
also intended to provide a more comprehensive explanation of the personality trait for the
motivational styles (Boyle, Matthews & Saklofske, 2008). With a systematic and clear questions
range of Form S is high which is from .86 to .92 while the domain range for Form R is from .89
to .95 (Ralph L, 2001). Since the feature measured by IPIP NEO-PI-R show excellent long-term
stability, it mean the result of the retest reliability is high and satisfactory (Costa, 1996).
Employers can rely on this test and assign different tasks to employee based on their personality
The disadvantages of using IPIP NEO-PI-R is the booklets, answer sheets and the
computer software of it is quite costly if compare to other psychological test. According to PAR
(2012), the NEO PI-R Reusable Form S Item Booklets and the NEO PI-R Reusable Form R Item
Booklets cost $50.00. Besides, the cost for the limitless use NEO Software System is $495.00
(Ralph L, 2001). Unlike other psychological test such as 16 Personalities test that is free and can
be conducted online, IPIP NEO-PI-R is difficult to find in online and none of the website is
providing free test for it. Therefore, if the company want to use this test, they may have to spend
In addition, the disadvantage of using IPIP NEO-PI-R is the form S that is the self-
reported method. Since the self-reported questionnaire is depend on the employees honesty,
some of them may tend to be dishonest when conducting the test. According to Rob (2012), even
when the employees are trying to be honest, they may not able to provide the accurate answer
due to their introspection skill. The inaccurate result of the test that done by the employees may
have a big impact in the job arrangement. If the employees have been assigned to the job that
they are not familiar with or the job that are unsuitable for them, they may have the possibility to
Boyle, G., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. (2008). The SAGE handbook of personality theory
Costa, P., (1996). Work and Personality: Use of the NEO-PI-R in Industrial/Organisational
http://www4.parinc.com/Products/Product.aspx?ProductID=NEO-PI-R#Items
Ralph, L. P., (2016). Association for Assessment in Counseling (AACE) Newsnotes Article.
Rob. H., (2012). The dangers of self-report - Science Brainwaves. Science Brainwaves.