Nursing 362

Bhagyasree Malatker
Author/ Title Journal Problem/ Questio Resear Sample/Mode Validity/Reliab Data Analysis Summary &
Date Purpose ns/ ch ility Recommendat
Hypothe Design Instruments ions
sis
Kim CR; Free Recent Perspective Peer-led How Systemat Studies were there were None of the three Despite promising
C evaluations of s on Sexual Intervention efficient is ic Review eligible if they had insufficient trials that assessed results in some
the peer-led & s peer led an appropriate studies using the consistent condom trials, overall
approach in Reproductiv have approach comparison group, same use found a benefit. findings do not
Sept, 2008 adolescent e Health become in provided outcome One study reported provide
sexual health a popular adolescen preintervention measures to use a reduced risk of convincing
education: a method of t sexual and regression to chlamydia (0.2), but evidence that
systematic providing health? postintervention robustly assess another found no peer-led
review sexual data, and reported the impact of impact on STD education
health all outcomes. Only study quality and incidence. One improves sexual
education to 13 where chosen. bias, intervention study found that outcomes among
adolescents, components young women (but adolescents.
but or adherence to not young men) Future trials
the efficacy Hardens who received peer- should build on
of this recommendations led education were the successful
approach on efficacy more likely than trials
and the nonrecipients to conducted to date
methodologi have never had sex. and should strive
cal quality Most interventions to fulfill existing
of recent produced quality criteria
trials have improvements in
not been knowledge,
systematica attitudes and
lly intentions.
reviewed.
Tolli, M. V. Effectiveness Health The It is Systemat all studies that According to the there is no clear Further research
of peer Education objective of considere ic review described and criteria catalogue, evidence of the is needed to
Oct. 27 education Research the review d that evaluated an using the results effectiveness of determine
interventions is to peer intervention of the quality peer education factors that
for HIV determine education designed to be assessment in concerning HIV contribute to program
prevention, the has some implemented, in combination with prevention, effectiveness.
adolescent effectivenes advantage full or partially, by the assessment of adolescent
pregnancy s of peer s over peer educators and effects done by pregnancy
prevention education other that had as the study authors, prevention and
and sexual programs sexual objective the studies can be sexual health
health for human and the prevention of separated in four promotion for young
promotion for immunodefi reproducti HIV, the prevention groups regarding people in the
young people: ciency virus ve of adolescent recommendation member countries
a systematic (HIV) health pregnancy and/or for of the European
review of prevention, promotion the promotion of implementation. Union
European adolescent methods. sexual health
studies. pregnancy Among in young people,
prevention them, aged between 10
and there is and 24 years. 17
 promotion the were chosen.
of sexual perceived
health credibility
among of peer
young educators
people. for the
target
group.
Gendered Journal of The the Qualitati The clinics are The scenarios Male and female Sexual health
Mark Hayter attitudes Clinical objective of literature ve study designed for young were tested for attitudes clearly clinics must take
and towards Nursing this study indicates people clarity and realism differ. Female alcohol use by
Christina sexual was to that between the ages with young people responses are more their clients more
Harrison, relationships explore the young of 1318 years attending clinics. complex and seriously,
among broad people although the Data analysis was empathic because integrating advice
2008 adolescents gender- value a majority of conducted by the of the more and help about
attending based non- service users are two members of complex nature of harmful drinking
nurse led attitudes judgment aged 1416. A the research team the social pressures into sexual health
sexual health and al and purposive to compare that sexualize promotion work.
clinics in opinions understan approach to emerging findings. young women.
England: a towards all ding sampling was In addition, Young males are not
qualitative of the case approach used. research as subject to these
study studies and from colleagues were social forces. Young
not to health invited to review men are socialized
explore any profession the data and the into behaviour that
differences als in this emerging themes can place females
between sensitive in a form of peer under pressure to
attitudes area of review of data have sex this
towards healthcare pressure can
health care include the use of
services alcohol.
among
nurses.
Jeffrey V. Systematic Croatian To examine The study Systemat After a second The review only The young people The risk behavior
Lazarus, Review of Medical the looked at ic Review hand-review, we chose studies that studied were more most susceptible
Henna Interventions Journal effectivenes several eliminated 21 of had positive accepting of peer- for change is
Sihvonen- to Prevent s of different the 40 studies behavioral led than teacher-led condom use, so
Riemenschn Spread of intervention methods since they were outcomes to interventions. Peer- focusing on
eider,Ulrich Sexually s seeking to of duplications or include in their led interventions condom use and
Laukamm- Transmitted prevent the interventi failed to fit our analyses. were also more measuring
Josten, Fiona Infections, spread of ons search criteria (eg, successful in program
Wong, and Including HIV, sexually including addressing young improving sexual effectiveness by
Jerker Among Young transmitted peer led, people). This knowledge, though testing for
Liljestrand People in infections healthcare review focuses on there was no clear sexually
Europe (STI), profession the 19 studies, difference in their transmitted
Feb 2010 including al led, and including 8 RCTs effectiveness in infections would
HIV, among teacher that survived the changing behavior. hopefully improve
young led to final review. interventions
people in determine against the
the future spread of HIV and
European policy STIs among young
Union. developm people in Europe.
ent. It did
not have a
 preconcei
ved idea
of which
works
best.

Adeline Impact of Community The Homeless Two The sample was The groups Multiple linear Further research
Nyamathi, Nursing Mental objective youth in group conveniently consisted of one regression analysis is needed to
Barbara Intervention Health was to the past Pilot gathered from 156 group target revealed higher six- determine
Kennedy, on Improving Journal assess have study walk-ins into the HIV/Hepatitis month scores in factors that
Catherine HIV, Hepatitis improvemen responded facility that needed transmission and total HIV/AIDS contribute to
Branson, Knowledge t in HIV better to advice for drug the other knowledge, program
Benissa and Mental cognitive interventi related issues. targeting the drug HIV/AIDS cognitive effectiveness.
Salem, Health Among and ons that abuse issues. The knowledge, HIV Because of the
Farinaz Homeless transmissio are age first was Nurse led transmission various different
Khalilifard, Young Adults n related HIV/Hep Health knowledge and HBV factors that
Mary knowledge, peers. Promotion and HCV knowledge contribute to drug
Marfisee, hepatitis Program and the at 6 months in the abuse and STD
Daniel knowledge, other use art Hepatitis Health transmission. It
Getzoff, and mental therapy called Art Promotion (HHP) was difficult to
Barbara health at Messaging group compared to determine the
Leake six-month program the Art Messaging measures of
follow-up. (AM) group. The assessments.
July 2012 HHP group revealed
an improvement in
psychological well-
being compared to
the AM group