hy don’t we see more merg- uals. Add thousands of acquisitions for a largish The reasons again are very Indian. Of
W ers and acquisitions (M&As)
in media? According to VC- CEdge, a financial research platform individual producers who make a bulk of the country’s annual aver- language paper compa- ny, says that they ad- mitted defeat after a the Rs 20,000 crore collected from consumers in cash, just about Rs 2,000- Rs 3,000 crore goes back to broad- of VCCircle.com, 22 (or 5 per cent of age of 1,000-odd films year. In print no one casters. Of the rest, a tiny percentage 449) M&A deals in corporate India came and you have a fairly po- wants to sell because the will show up as revenues with cable from media and entertainment in 2009. tent mix of organised newspaper a single companies. The remaining money This is down from 37 (or 6 per cent chaos and revenue leak- brand owner has, is her is completely lost. Why would anyone of 542) in 2008. On value, the share ages. The world’s largest raison d’être. It is the on- who generates that much income in of media and entertainment is even low- film-making and -watch- ly tool of influence she cash want to sell out? This, by the way, er — 1.24 per cent (of $16.2 billion) in 2009, down from 2.2 per cent (of $27.8 ing country made just under $3 billion from MEDIA SCOPE has, the reason she gets any importance in her is the same reason why outdoor me- dia owners do not sell out. billion) in the previous year. 1,300 films in 2008 com- VANITA city or state. Hanging on For these and myriad other reasons, As capital flows liberally into the sec- pared to about $40 bil- KOHLI-KHANDEKAR to ownership has noth- media and entertainment continues tor, as it has since 2007, one would have lion for 550-odd films ing to do with making to remain a small, fragmented business. expected more consolidation-driven from Hollywood in 2009. money. How can you argue with that? Globally, scale has come to this busi- growth. There has been the odd TV18 But you hardly see any consolida- Over the last few years, many in- ness by acquisition of brands in genres which has gobbled up lots of smaller tion happening. The two mergers an- vestment bankers have discovered that or geographies that are missing in the firms, the odd newspaper deal from The nounced earlier this year (both on deals in media are hard to come by. And buyer’s portfolio. For instance, think of Times Group or Jagran Prakashan, the the retail side) — PVR-DT Cinemas and most have a similar list of interesting what could happen if the Sun Network sale of a few radio stations or channels INOX-Fame — did not materialise. reasons why deals don’t happen. In TV, merges with Sony or vice versa. In here and there, but that is about it. Consider print, a hot industry right there are 30,000 cable operators carv- the absence of these opportunities, the And yet, if there is one industry where now going by the amount of mon- ing out 83 million cable homes among firms that want to make money are do- M&As could really deliver value, it is ey pouring in and the valuations. All them. Till consolidation happens, this ing it the old-fashioned way — by launch- this. The $17-billion Indian media and the capital generated has led to on- business cannot be profitable for the ing new products and going into new entertainment industry is very frag- ly two major deals — Sun-Dinakaran large cable companies or for broad- markets, even if they are crowded. As mented. It doesn’t matter which segment and Jagran-Mid-Day. This is an in- casters. However, consolidation is mov- they succeed, the pressure on exist- you talk of — print, TV, films — almost dustry with about 60,000-odd regis- ing at a snail’s pace. The largest com- ing companies to sell will rise. all are a nightmare to operate in. tered newspapers and about 1,000 panies can still boast of only two-three That is perhaps when we will see Take films for instance. More than serious companies. million subscribers. some serious M&A action. 90 per cent of India’s 11,000-odd screens One investment banker, who scout- Talk to any of the firms trying to are single screens owned by individ- ed the length and breadth of India for acquire operators — it is an uphill task. Vanitakohli@hotmail.com