S.O.

S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.11 issue.13 . 06 / 04 / 2017

Stop targeting whistleblower Justice Karnan. Clean up the judicial system

By Mathews J Nedumpara

Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani recently wrote a scathing letter to the Calcutta High Courts Justice CS Karnan, advising him to take

back every word he has said about two Madras High Court judges and pray for pardon. Jethmalani has termed Justice Karnans actions

as lunatic. Neither me nor the National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms (NLC), of which I am the president,

supports Justice Karnan nor justifies his tantrums. However, the NLC supports Justice Karnan because corruption has spread its

tentacles in the justice delivery system.

Justice Karnans anger might be out of feelings of discrimination, isolation and, or, humiliation. His attack on his brother Judges of the

Madras HC, sitting and retired, is perhaps vindictive. He accuses them of having indulged in corruption, nepotism and malpractice.

Though many accused of corruption and malpractices by him could be innocent or could have indulged in venial and not venal act of

corruption or malpractice, the allegation against at least a few of them may not be unfounded.
But the question to be answered is whether alleging corruption against sitting or retired Judges of the high court or the Supreme Court

amounts to contempt of court as defined in Section 2(1)(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 or will it attract the inherent jurisdiction

of the Supreme Court under Art.138, r/w. Arts. 140 and 142 of the Constitution to punish a person for contempt of court.

The concept of contempt of court is a cathartic jurisprudence, which has its origin in the Canon Law and, in particular, the Canon Law of

the Dark Ages, a jurisprudence of a time when the offence of heresy, nay, contempt of the Church, where the contemnor is burnt alive at

a stake.

The in terrorem (a legal threat, usually one given in hope of compelling someone to act without resorting to a lawsuit or criminal

prosecution) jurisprudence of contempt of Court militates against all canons of justice and fair play; it flourished in the Middle Ages

when Inquisition was the mode of justice administration, where contemnor was tortured to extract guilt. The foundation of The Contempt

of Courts Act, 1971 on the jurisprudence of the Dark Ages is classically exemplified in Sub-Section (5) of Section 17 of the Act.

Our constitutional and criminal laws are founded on the principle that the guilt against a person accused of an offence ought not to be

wrung out of him, but has to be proved against him by other men and means.

Sub-Section (5) of Section 17, supra, places the burden to prove his innocence upon the contemnor; it requires him to file an affidavit in

support of his defence and empowers the Court to determine the matter on the affidavit of the contemnor. Section 17(5) of the

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, therefore, is in violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution, which states that no person accused of any

offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself; so too Arts. 21, 14 and 19 thereof, which are required to be read together.

The power of contempt, as is presently exercised by the judges of the higher judiciary is, with much respect, more susceptible to be

abused than used.

I have witnessed such misuse often against the voiceless, the outspoken and persons who are upright. The power of contempt has

often been misused against the voices of truth, even though truth is an undeniable defence against contempt proceedings.

Resorting to the power of contempt without application of judicial mind has ramifications. It creates fear, a terror, and worst, hatred, in

the minds of citizen. As pointed out, the fear has led to not venturing to write anything about the functioning of the judiciary, except

eulogising and flattery.

Undoubtedly, in the suo motu contempt of court proceeding against Justice Karnan, the prosecutor and the judge, both at once, are the

judges themselves. The contempt of court law is undemocratic and, assuming it to be otherwise, the question is, could any action lie

against Justice Karnan?

It certainly will not, as:

Even assuming that Justice Karnan has made allegations of corruption and malpractices against his judges, he has not committed any

contempt of court.

The concept of equality before law and equal protection of law is at the core of the Constitution.

For the judges against whom Justice CS Karnan has made the allegations of corruption, the law provides for remedy, both civil and
criminal.

It is enough to refer to the suit filed by Justice PB Sawant, former judge of the Supreme Court, against Times Now claiming Rs 100

crore as damages to support my contention that law provides for adequate remedy if Justice Karnan has made false or scurrilous

allegations against his brethren.

Is it then right for me to expect the vilified judges to institute civil and criminal cases like ordinary citizens? Yes, because in the eyes of

the law, all are equal; the immunity which judges enjoy is for what they do from the seats of justice.
I am made to understand that some of the allegations made by Justice Karnan are against the chief justice of the Madras High Court on

the administrative side about the construction of court complexes, appointment of judges. It must be said that a situation where judges

are accused of corruption and they are forced to institute civil and criminal cases is against their prestige and honour and is no way an

ideal situation.

Corruption is undoubtedly spreading its tentacles in the corpus of the justice delivery system, which does not merely mean judges

alone.

There ought to be a remedy. The remedy is not in silencing the whisleblowers with the guillotine of contempt of court. Theres a need to

bring into existence a credible mechanism by which allegations of corruption, nepotism and malpractices against judges are

investigated and those who are guilty are brought to book without impinging their independence and the sanctity of the justice delivery

system.

The judicial function has been considered to be sacrosanct; courts are temples of justice; its majesty and credibility and the confidence

of the public has to be zealously guarded, but not by silencing whisleblowers and upright men and women who dare to point out

instances of corruption, nepotism and malpractices, risking their professional prospects, nay, even their freedom and liberty.

Notice To Chief Justice of India

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/notice-to-chief-justice

Editorial : Are all Judges Honest ? Satya Harishchandra ?

Why no action against judges who committed sex crimes against women , who swindled employees provident fund money , etc , While
Judges belonging to powerful castes , having influence , who have done grave crimes are let off , their cases buried. Justice karnan is
tortured as he is a dalit without any influence for exposing crimes. So called learned advocates are defying gentleman's boundaries and
personally calling a judge as lunatic. Are those learned advocates cultured , gentleman , what they have done to safeguard justice.
Read JUSTICE KARNAN VICTIMIZED in web news paper SOS E CLARION OF DALIT. Judge's Mafia. Overall in this saga certain
people want to bury the corruption allegations made by Justice Karnan, by diversion from core issue of corruption by judges. In the
same way dalit judges Justice Gwal & Justice Ramakrishna were tortured by High ranking judges , where is the justice to these
persecuted dalit judges ? Why not their tormentors high court & supreme court judges legally prosecuted under Prevention of Atrocities
Act against SC /ST ?

Judges SEX crimes

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-sex-crimes

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
50% of higher judiciary corrupt, says ex-SC judge Markandey Katju

http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-katju/story-
Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html

Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-minister/articleshow/6568723.cms

In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by SC judges, Congress

http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-congress-news-national-
rcruamjjfdhhc.html ,

Calcutta HC Justice Karnan calls judiciary corrupt, brings up old allegations against HC judges

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/calcutta-hc-justice-karnan-calls-judiciary-corrupt-brings-up-old-allegations-against-hc-
judges/story-k0WRYaBWRPYaUI6HgzPDHP.html

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

The mafia of corrupt has never allowed for transparent , impartial investigation into criminal cases involving higher judges &
public servants. Justice Karnan is in the position of high court judge due to his merit , talent , education not on the basis of
reservation or anybodys mercy. Justice Karnan is a whistle blower , he has exposed corruption in the higher judiciary , he has not done
any crimes. Now , powers that be instead of ordering for a fair investigation into his charges, is trying all out to silence him. Some
people are even making personal attacks , by calling him lunatic. Those persons may be beneficiaries of the existing corrupt judicial
system and they want to continue with this present corrupt system.

In a Mental Hospital ward , say there are number of mentally challenged patients playing inside the ward. A doctor & his assistant
enters the ward to check , give routine medicines , injections to patients and then all those patients call the doctor himself as mad.
It is the same situation now.

Are not the so called learned , aged advocate ( @ gods airport ) and learned judges see the crimes by judges in the past. See
sample cases mentioned above & below. What action taken by those learned judges & learned advocate , to safe guard law in the
above / below mentioned cases? Our judicial system is being weakened by corrupt judges & few , greedy advocates ( learned
? ) , NOT by whistle blowers who have sacrificed to protect the nation from corrupt people.

In the past few judges belonging to powerful castes facing charges of gravest crimes , got a smooth sailing , their cases white
washed. But Justice Karnan belonging to oppressed Dalit class is being tortured for standing up against corruption. He has done
no crimes. This is the very reason few honest judges & honest advocates keep silent fearing victimization.

Hereby , we demand Honourable Supreme Court of India :

1. To order transparent , impartial investigation into all the above mentioned corruption cases involving high ranking judges.

2. To order for filing charges under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act against high ranking judges who tortured Dalit Judges
Justice Karnan , Justice Gawl & Justice Ramakrishna.

3. To order for filing charges under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act against learned advocate & others who made personal
attacks on Justice Karnan by calling him as lunatic and for obstructing legal prosecution of the corrupt judges.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Yours

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi.

27 atrocities against Dalits every day

13 Dalits murdered every week
5 Dalits' homes or possessions burnt every week
6 Dalits kidnapped or abducted every week
3 Dalit women raped every day
11 Dalits beaten every day
A crime committed against a Dalit every 18 minutes

Indian Match Fixing Corrupt Judges

http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-katju/story-
Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html ,

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-minister/articleshow/6568723.cms ,

http://justicekatju.blogspot.in/2014/08/corrupt-judges.html ,

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-court-sends-senior-judge-to-jail-lawyer-husband-court-commissioner-to-police-custody-2260018 ,

http://www.indiancorruptjudges.com/ ,

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-
bzO1Uw18aTg/WIpdlMZlaaI/AAAAAAAAGJc/0wE9uQGZukE7VKrye0_QWS1K8gWDoBQWgCLcB/s1600/Karnan%2527s%2Bletter.jpg
,

http://wakeupindia-designer.blogspot.in/2017/01/mumbai-27-th-2017-justice-chinnasamy.html ,

Editorial : Atrocities on Dalits by Judges - SHAME SHAME

- An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India, National Human Rights Commission & National Commission for

Scheduled Castes / Scheduled Tribes

The track record of apex court is not clean. There is secrecy involved in selection , promotion , transfer of judges to high court &

supreme court. Supreme court judges take huge pay , perks from public exchequer ( now on the verge of getting triple fold increase in

pay ) but are not accountable to public. They dont give information to public , concerning judges and national security , public welfare.

Consider the case of Dalit judge of sukma , chattisgarh , he was removed for being honest , for upholding law ? Now, Justice Karnan

a whistle blower is being victimized. Apex court is not looking seriously at issues raised by justice karnan but concentrating on

silencing him.
 When other high ranking judges ( having influence & belonging to upper castes ) were accused of more grave crimes like

involvement in sex racket , sex crimes against women , national security crimes , etc , they were treated with kid gloves , cases hush

hushed , white washed. Inspite of fervent appeals even apex court didnt bother to conduct a public , transparent enquiry. Now apex

court has initiated suo motto contempt proceedings against Justice Karnan as he is a DALIT , without influence of powers that

be.

When a poor dalit person or person belonging to weaker section , SC / ST builds a temporary hutment on government land ,

officials , police take suo motto action , evicts that person & razes down that hutment immediately. Where as when a rich person

belonging to upper caste , having influence of powers that be builds huge buildings usurping government land , lake bed , etc no suo

motto action by police . Officials , police dont take action inspite of repeated appeals by concerned public. The courts of justice

instead of upholding public cause , gives stay orders protecting rich land grabbers but in the same fashion judges dont come to the

rescue of poor dalit hut dwellers. Even when land grabbings were brought to the notice of apex court at the very early stage itself,

apex court instead of preventing the land grabbing silently allowed the grabbers to continue with their land crimes. The enactments

of laws by various state governments including government of Karnataka regularizing illegal land constructions is solely to benefit

greedy , rich land grabbers belonging to upper castes. Inspite of repeated appeals the apex court has not annulled those illegal laws of

various state governments.

Just consider the prison population in india , 80% of prisoners are under trials and majority of them are dalits, tribals , belongs to

weaker sections , SC / ST. Most of them cannt afford lawyers , most of them are implicated by their upper caste masters , land lords .

Even within the prison , their rights are not respected by authorities , are treated worse than animals. Where as deadly criminals

convicted of gravest crimes ( but rich , belongs to upper castes) enjoys many luxuries within the prison. It proves the vulnerability of

the dalits , weakers sections in india.

So many dalits , weaker section people were cheated of their job oppurtunities in mysuru university , KSOU , Various Government

Medical colleges , Government aided ITIs , Polytechnics in Karnataka state by scheming upper caste officials. Inspite of repeated

appeals , why apex court has not taken legal prosecution to logical end and ensured justice to aggrieved dalits ? What action supreme

court has taken against KPSC , VYAPAM members who denied job oppurtunities to merited candidates , dalit & weaker section

candidates ? ? let alone take suo motto action . No action to logical end.

Day in day out there are rampant atrocities against dalits , weaker sections of people by public servants , judges are not doing their

duties properly. Supreme court judges are enjoying lakhs of rupees pay , perks , 5 star bungalows , foreign trips , weeks long summer /

winter paid vacations , proposed triple fold salary hike all at tax payers expense. These judges must be first booked for Atrocities

against Dalits , Weaker sections under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act.

If at all , Supreme Court of India is impartial , without bias , let it come out clean :

1. To immediately stay contempt proceedings against Justice Karnan and Order impartial enquiry against judges

accused of corruption , impropriety by Justice Karnan and all other issues raised by him. Take the help of Justice Karnan in

collecting evidences.

2. Order impartial enquiry against almost half of former chief justices of india accused of corruption by NGOs.

3. Immediately give justice to past Sukma Dalit Judge who was unjustly removed.

4. Immediately give truthful , full information , answers to RTI questions sent to Supreme Court of India by our

publication years ago. Inspite of several appeals , majority of questions are unanswered & for few questions got ambiguous

answers.
5. Immediately take action to protect fundamental rights , human rights of whistle blowers , RTI Activists & Human

Rights Activists.

6. Immediately take action against KPSC , VYAPAM members responsible for illegal recruitments , cancel all those illegal

recruitments and conduct recruitments afresh with old candidates.

7. Immediately take action against KSOU , Mysuru University , Government Medical Colleges , Government Aided

Polytechnics , ITI officials responsible for illegal recruitments , cancel all those illegal recruitments and conduct

recruitments afresh with old candidates.

8. Immediately annul laws enacted by various state governments in india regularizing illegal constructions by land

grabbers .

9. Make public the names of all land grabbers , majority of them belongs to upper castes and are rich , greedy.

10. Protect the rights of prisoners in india irrespective of their caste affiliations.

11. Ensure speedy justice , legal aid to under trials belonging to weaker sections , SC & ST.

12. Fix lower amount for bail surety or create a corpus to give bail amount to under trials belonging to SC , ST , Weaker

sections , Dalits. Many dalits who are poor are unable to pay bail amount and suffer in jail for years much more than the

legally stipulated punishment even if convicted.

13. Enforce uniform rules , uniform food , uniform health care , uniform prison cell to all prisoners irrespective of their caste

, whether he is an ex chief minister , ex managing director of a big company , ex religious guru or an ordinary person , a

dalit , a tribal. Ensure equality , equal treatment in prisons , jails.

14. Why NOT criminal prosecution of guilty judges who commited atrocities on dalits under SC / ST Atrocities prevention

act is not taken , till its logical end ? are judges above law ? why such guilty judges are put behind bars for this non bailable

offence ? only transfer or resignation of judges will not serve the purpose , they must be put behind bars & legally

prosecuted for their heinous crimes . Is the not the apex court is also practicing double standards & indirectly aiding atrocities

on dalits ? Read following sample cases of Atrocities on Dalits committed by Judges.

15. Immediately admit PILs presented before supreme court of india by our publication . Read full details at following web

pages ;

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts.

- Mahatma Gandhi
Contempt Proceedings should not be used as a weapon to silence voices seeking justice , accountability of judiciary.

Respect of judiciary doesnt come out of fear rather spontaneously it comes out of a persons heart when he sees a honest

judge doing his duties honestly.

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Yours ,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Allegations of dalit atrocities and nepotism against CV Nagarjuna Reddy J. of Andhra Pradesh

The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) has written to Chief Justice of India TS Thakur seeking initiation of in-
house proceedings against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy for alleged atrocities against members of Dalit community.

In a 9-page letter written on August 30 this year, the CJAR has detailed various allegations against the sitting judge including a detailed
account of criminal misconduct against a dalit magistrate.

According to the letter, one Rama Krishna, a Principal Junior Civil judge in Kadappa District, was forced by Justice Nagarjuna Reddy to
remove the name of Pavan Kumar Reddy from a dying declaration recorded by Rama Krishna when he was posted as a magistrate.
Pavan Reddy happens to be the brother of Justice Reddy.

As per the dying declaration given by the victim, Pavan Reddy had doused the victim with petrol and set him of fire when he refused to
sign on a blank paper.

Soon thereafter, on 30.11.2012, it is alleged by Mr. Rama Krishna that Justice Nagarjuna Reddy rang him up, and directed him to
remove his brothers name from the dying declaration. Mr. Rama Krishna also alleges that he was threatened and abused by the said
judge when he refused to accede to his request.

It has also been alleged that the Magistrate was later summoned to Justice Nagarjuna Reddys house where,

.Pavan Reddy and Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy abused him and beat him up. He further alleges that Justice C. V. Nagarjuna
Reddy kicked him with his shoes and abused his caste.

It is Rama Krishnas allegation that he was victimised following this incident by unexplained transfers and suspensions.

Another allegation against the judge is the abuse of power to get that very Pavan Reddy appointed as Additional Public Prosecutor.

Mr. Pavan Kumar Reddy was appointed as Additional Public Prosecutor in the year 2006 for a period of three years in contravention of
the law that mandates seven years of continuous practice as an advocate prior to appointment as an Additional Public Prosecutor.

Based on the above, CJAR has not only sought an in-house enquiry but has also asked for the suspension of judicial work assigned
to Justice Reddy. Chief Justice Thakur has not responded to CJARs representation yet.

This is the second such allegation against a sitting judge of High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

In 2015, an Additional District judge from Andhra Pradesh had approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 alleging caste
discrimination by a sitting High Court judge, Justice M Satyanarayana Murthy.

The Supreme Court had, however, refused to admit the matter with a Bench presided by then Chief Justice Dattu likening the case to a
service matter and observing that the case was a grievance of an individual and cannot be considered as a case pertaining to
Fundamental rights.

Impeachment Motion: Five Main Allegations Against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy

December 9, 2016 8:45 pm

Sixty one Rajya Sabha members have moved a petition for impeachment proceedings against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy of
the Andhra Pradesh/Telangana High Court.

The following are the main allegations against the Judge

Misused his position as HC judge to victimize a Dalit Judge

The impeachment motion describes the allegation made by Mr. Rama Krishna, formerly Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty,
Kadapa District, currently under suspension, that he was forced by Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy to remove the name of Mr. Pavan
Kumar Reddy who happens to be the brother of Justice Reddy, from a dying declaration recorded by Mr. Rama Krishna when he was
posted as Magistrate in Rayachoty. He alleged that Justice Reddy had summoned him to his home and when he refused to remove the
name of his brother from the dying declaration, he kicked him with his shoes and abused his caste.

Charges of Dalit atrocity against spouse, daughter and brother

Another incident of alleged Dalit atrocity pertaining to the registration of an FIR by the Dalit tenants against Justice C.V. Nagarjuna
Reddys wife and daughter, is also mentioned. There also allegations that Mr. Pavan Kumar Reddy commits these various atrocities
against the Dalits community under the protective banner of his brother, Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddys influence

Disproportionate income

The motion also alleges that Justice Reddy abused his position to amass several movable and immovable properties crores of rupees
disproportionate to his known sources of income.

Non-Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities

Yet another allegation against Justice Reddy is that he has not disclosed his assets and liabilities in violation of the Code of Conduct
that mandates declaration of assets of oneself and dependents by all the judges.

Misconduct when he was an Advocate

It is also mentioned in the impeachment motion that Justice Reddy committed misconduct while he was working as Standing Counsel,
for the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

India's courts 'condone' Dalit atrocities

Caste-blind judiciary fails Dalit victims as number of sex attacks are reported against former untouchables.
Twenty two years ago, in Bhateri village in the western Indian state of Rajasthan, Bhanwari Devi was gang-raped by five men. The
reason was neither lust nor just patriarchy. Devis fault was that as a lower-caste woman, she had dared to transgress the age old
strictures of caste - by protesting against the practice of child marriage, which was a staple among the upper-castes. Hence, he was
meted out a "deserving punishment".

When the matter finally reached the court, the judge acquitted all the five rapists, holding, among a host of other reasons, that since the
upper castes practised strict untouchability, it was inconceivable that any of the five would touch a lower caste woman. Till today, Devi
remains deprived of justice.

Now that there is a tidal wave of opprobrium and condemnation against the gang-rapes and murder at Badaun in northern Uttar
Pradesh state and the gang-rapes in Bhagana, Haryana, the next question one is confronted with is - will justice be done? And if so,
how?

While investigations are still on, and arrests have been made, it is only the first step. The final outcome in the courts is all that matters,
and it is here that there is cause for much alarm and disappointment. For, Indias courts have consistently failed the Dalits
(untouchables) by steadfastly refusing to acknowledge that sexual violence is perpetrated because of a woman's caste.

The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, commonly known as PoA Act, recognises rape and
other forms of sexual violence as an "atrocity"- an aggravated offence, as opposed to the general crime of rape. The reason is that an
atrocity, as philosopher Claudia Card defines it, is a "gross evil - the widespread toleration of wrongfully perpetrated intolerable harm to
individuals".

Because Dalit women's bodies are stigmatised - they are considered expendable and justifiably available for recreational (pleasure-
seeking) or punitive purposes of upper-caste men, the law seeks to bring in substantive equality by recognising the lived reality of the
victims.

Therefore, it is imperative for courts to recognise that the sine qua non for the deeming rape as an atrocity under the law is that the
violence was perpetrated on the ground that the victim hailed from a lower caste.

Tragically, it is here that the judicial record is one of abject failure. Not only have the judges refused to acknowledge the reality of caste,
but have also attributed reasons such as "unrequited passion", "exploration of sexuality" and let off the accused. Even if there is a
conviction for rape, an acquittal from the charges of atrocity renders justice not only incomplete, but also as a travesty.
Khairlanji village in western Maharashtra state stands out as the most infamous example in recent times. On September 26, 2006, four
members of Suresh Bhotmange's (a Dalit) family were killed in the most gruesome manner. His wife and daughter were stripped,
thrashed, and paraded naked through the village, before being subjected to a fiendish gang-rape.

Nothing was left....knives, iron rods, spikes of bullock cart wheels- everything was thrust in their private parts. Bhotmange's "crime" was
the police complaint that he had lodged against the upper-caste Hindus grabbing the plot of land that was rightfully his.

The autopsy was done in the shoddiest manner - no efforts were made to test for rape, even though the naked bodies of the two
women lay in the village for a considerable period of time. All the accused who were arrested were convicted by the trial court of murder
and other offences, but not for rape.

Worse was in store in the Bombay High Court. In its 2010 judgement, the court put down the atrocities to reasons of personal rivalry
and individual revenge. Shockingly, the court went to considerable lengths to hold that because there was no evidence, no rape had
been committed - completely ignoring the harsh reality - that there would be no witnesses, and that the trial court had committed a
glaring omission by ignoring evident facts. If the naked and badly mangled bodies of Dalit women did not stir the court to acknowledge
sexual atrocity, perhaps nothing else could have. The appeal against the high courts judgement remains undecided till this date.

The case of Hanamath was an appeal to the Karnataka High Court against the conviction of four men for gang-raping a 15-year-old
Dalit girl. The court upheld the conviction of rape because it could have done little else - all the proof - eyewitness testimony and
forensic evidence were stacked against the accused. But when it came to holding the culprits guilty under the PoA Act, the court not
only demonstrated its blindness to caste, but took the "boys will be boys" line of reasoning, holding that the gang-rape was "a lustful act
of misguided youth".

Leave aside convictions. How does one prove to the court that a rape was committed because the perpetrators wanted to exercise their
upper caste power and pelf? There cannot be any rule of evidence, except that of social reality - that the caste system, in all its vicious
manifestations, exists.

Hence, the Supreme Court's judgement in Ramdas (2006) rankles, and rankles hard. In the dead of night, three men dragged out a
young woman of the low-ranking Pardhi caste and raped her. This was after she had refused to obey their summons, belonging to a
landowning upper-caste, who wanted her to satisfy their carnal desires.

Of course, they wouldnt have had the temerity to exercise the same obnoxious power on a woman of their own, or a higher caste, but
then, Dalit women are fair game!

But the court was not inclined to accept this, and held - "The mere fact that the victim happened to be a girl belonging to a scheduled
(lower) caste does not attract the provisions of the (PoA) Act."

When a judgement of the Supreme Court deals a body blow to the very foundations of the law which aims to protect, impunity will
certainly continue, unabated.

Contempt notice shows Supreme Court's Anti-dalit bias, says Justice S C Karnan

In what might be a first, Calcutta high court's Justice S C Karnan, facing a notice from the Supreme Court in a contempt case, has
lashed out at the apex court, accusing it of harbouring a caste bias against him.

In defiance of the SC's decision and sharply escalating the confrontation with the apex court, Karnan accused the CJI J S Khehar-led
seven-judge bench of uppercaste bias in initiating proceedings as he belonged to the Dalit community.

Karnan virtually alleged that the court order amounts to an offence under the law to punish atrocities against Dalits and tribals and
challenged the court to refer his case to Parliament.

He said: "The suo motu order against me, a Dalit judge, is unethical and goes against the SC and ST (Prevention of) Atrocities Act. It is
certainly a national issue and a wise decision would be to refer the issue to the House of Parliament."

The judge argued that since the order against him was "harsh", the contempt case should be heard after CJI Khehar retired or placed
before Parliament if this was not possible.

In his anxiety to respond to the SC's February 8 judicial order, Karnan addressed a four-page letter to the SC's registrar general, a post
that no longer exists as it was redesignated years ago as secretary general.

Karnan, who has been at the centre of several controversies, was issued a notice and asked to present himself in the Supreme Court
on February 13 to explain "scurrilous" allegations against sitting and former judges.

In response to the apex apex court's contempt proceedings, Justice Karnan said: "The suo motu petition is not maintainable against a
sitting judge of the HC... I have sent representations to various government authorities regarding high irregularities and illegalities
occurring at the judicial courts.

I am also a responsible judge to control such high irregularities, especially corruption and malpractice. I have furnished comprehensive
proof of unethical practices happening with the respective courts.

'Upper caste judges taking law into hands'

He had earlier written to the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, levelling charges of anti-Dalit bias against the chief justice of
the Madras high court in 2014 when he was a member of the bench there.

Referring to the February 8 order that also stripped him of judicial and administrative work, Karnan said: "The characteristic of this order
clearly shows that the upper caste judges are taking law into their hands and misusing their judicial power by operating the same
against a SC/ST judge (Dalit) with mala fide intention to get rid of him."

Referring to the "harsh order" passed earlier by a bench headed by Khehar, Karnan said: "Therefore, my deep request is to hear the
suo motu contempt after retirement of the Chief Justice of India. In the meanwhile, my administrative work and judicial assignment
could be restored.

My main contention is only to uproot the corruption prevailing at the Madras high court, and not to spoil the sanctity and decorum of the
court."

"I (had) issued a list of the corrupted judges wherein an inquiry is mandatory, as such the suo motu petition is not maintainable. The
order of the apex court in the suo motu contempt petition is erroneous and has been wilfully and wantonly and with mala fide intention
was passed.

Therefore, these proceedings may be referred to Parliament, wherein I will establish the high rate of corruption prevailing with the
judiciary at the Madras high court."

Indicating that he might not present himself before the seven-judge bench of the SC on February 13, he said: "The Supreme Court had
not granted stipulated time (for him to respond to the contempt notice), which is highly irregular."

DALIT Judge dismissed for being HONEST ?

- An Appeal to Honourable Chief Justice of India

Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sukma District in Chhattisgarh state of India Mr. Prabhakar Gwal is a Dalit , from oppressed class.
Being from an oppressed class , he best understood the sufferings of oppressed sections of society , sufferings of people , tribals
displaced from forests to make way for big industries , MNCs. He understood the oppression of common public by police , state
machinery resulting in common mans human rights , constitutional rights violations. He understood the machinations of state
machinery to favor big industrialists , also he understood the misuse of office by public servants all against the rule of LAW.

Sukma CJM Mr. Gwal sincerely did his constitutional duty , to uphold rule of law and earned the wrath of powers that be ,
Criminal Nexus , he was repeatedly interfered in his judicial duties , repeatedly transferred and now unjustly dismissed from service
without ANY ENQUIRY giving a chance for Mr.Gwal to make out his case. Whereas some other selfish judges turned their blind
eyes to the sufferings of public , violations of law by public servants , intentionally failed to uphold the law and got smooth sailing for
their own career.

Hereby , We urge the Honourable Chief Justice of India to order the Chhattisgarh State Government :

1. To immediately reinstate Mr.Gwal into judicial service.

2. To make posting at the same place , same court of Sukma , so that he can complete the cases concerning the powers that be to
the logical end.

3. To initiate criminal legal prosecution against district collector , police officials , public servants who directly & indirectly interfered
in the judicial duties performed by Mr. GWAL.

4. To initiate criminal legal prosecution against Chhattisgarh High Court Judges who instead of upholding rule of law , supporting
Mr. Gwal in his duties took sides with criminal nexus , powers that be and repeatedly transferred him and now dismissed him from
service without enquiry.

5. To reopen all the buried cases which were dealt by Mr. Gwal and buried by transfer of judge Mr. Gwal. To take action against
ministers , public servants involved in those cases.

6. To initiate criminal action against sukma district collector , police officials and Chhattisgarh High Court Judges on charges of
Atrocities against DALIT Mr. Gwal who was repeatedly harassed by them.

7. To initiate criminal prosecution under anti terror laws , against present and past chattisgarh state government ministers , central
government ministers , police officials , public servants who were and are responsible for creation of terror outfit SALWA JUDUM ,
its recent terror child salwa judum 2. These public servants have indulged in terror acts of salwa judum , by aiding & sponsoring it ,
which is against law.

Date : 30.04.2016..Yours sincerely

Place : MysuruNagaraja.M.R.

Chief Judicial Magistrate- Sukma district dismissed by Chhattisgarh Government

The Raman Singh government has dismissed Sukma districts Chief Judicial Magistrate Prabhakar Gwal from service in public
interest, following the recommendation of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Mr. Gwal, a Dalit Magistrate was dismissed on the basis
of available material (not in public domain) without a internal/departmental inquiry.

On April 4 afternoon, Mr Gwal had updated the news of his termination via his Facebook account-

DISTRICT COURT DANTEWADA (918982620495):- //ORDER//

F.No.3335/987/XXI-B/C.G./16
Raipur, dated 01.04.2016

Government of Chhattisgarh state hereby, dismisses Shri prabhakar gwal, Member of lower Judicial Services, Civil judge class-I and
Chief judicial magistrate, Sukma, from service in public interest with immediate effect.

District and sessions Judge

South Baster dantewada C.G.

Earlier, Gwal had hit the headlines for alleging that a BJP legislator, Ramlal Chouhan, had threatened him after he convicted five people
in connection with the leak of PMT question papers in 2011. His wife too had written to the President alleging harassment, claiming that
Gwal was transferred to Sukma as a result of his judgment. Mr Prabhakar had accused a ruling BJP MLA of threatening him over the
judgment.

Mr. Gwal has had a history of exposing corrupt officials and politicians. While Gwal was posted in Bilaspur, he had ordered an inquiry
against government officials and Police officers, for the infamous Bhadaura Land-Scam. The land scam is known for involvement of a
senior minister of BJP (Amar Agrawal). Similarly, he had ordered for inquiry of Bilaspur RTO officials. He was then transferred to Raipur,
where he rejected to accept Closure Report in the case of IPS Rahul Sharmas suicide. After that he was transferred to Dantewada.
Recently his phone conversation with Dantewada Collector had gone viral, in which Collector had asked Gwal to consult him before
ordering to file any case.

He is known for taking strong actions against the executive arm of the government and enjoys a public image of being an upright man.
His dismissal comes after his wife filed a civil case against 19 people including judicial officers for harassing her husband. HC stayed
that case, meanwhile his dismissal was recommended.

A Dalit officer being dismissed in such a one-sided, clouded, swift manner raises larger questions on the system itself. Was he an
inconvenient man who didnt understand the system and its norms? Did his voice against BJP MLA (Ramla Chauhan), Mr Amar
Agarwal and Mr Neeraj Bhansod (for interfering in judicial work) made higher ups uncomfortable? These questions are being raised
after his dismissal. The ball is in the judiciary and government court to clear and come out clean. A dismissal order by merely stating,
that it is in public interest doesnt fit the democratic norms in 2016.

Protests greet Chhattisgarh governments dismissal of Sukmas Chief Judicial Magistrate

On 14 April, the Chhattisgarh government dismissed Sukmas Chief Judicial Magistrate Prabhakar Gwal. A 2006 batch judicial officer,
Gwal, belongs to the Dalit community and has questioned the manner in which the police have been indiscriminately arresting tribals in
the conflict zones of Chhattisgarh.

On 8 February, the Sukma Superintendent of Police complained to the District Judiciary against Gwal stating that among other things
he has been granting bail to naxal accused and such decisions have adversely affected the morale of the security forces and
weakens the judicial process. It is based on such complaints that Chhattisgarh government dismissed Gwal on the grounds of public
interest following the recommendation of the Chhattisgarh High Court. The Indian Association of Peoples Lawyers (IAPL), in a press
release, has protested

against the dismissal of Gwal, calling it unjustified. It said: Police high-handedness and harassment of those involved in the
administration of justice is nothing new to the conflict zones of Chhattisgarh. Recently advocates of the Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group
(JagLAG) have been forcefully evicted from Jagdalpur and pressure is being mounted on them by the police administration and police
backed vigilante groups to cease their legal practice. JagLAG has been providing legal Aid to many tribals incarcerated in Jagdalpur
and Dantewada. Similarly Social activists such as Soni Sori and Bela Bhatia and journalists like Malini Subramaniam,

Prabhat Singh, Santosh Yadav and Somaru Nag who have been raising issues of Human rights violations by the police administration
have been threatened, attacked or even arrested. The IAPL has alleged that under the pretext of Mission 2016, i.e., the present
offensive launched by the government to wipe out the Maoist movement in Chhattisgarh, the police in these areas have been taking
steps to see that no alternate voice emanates from these areas. The IAPL has raised the larger issue of keeping the judiciary away
from police interference , following this dismissal. Chhattisgarh jails are filled with tribals who have been arrested,

several false and fabricated criminal cases are foisted upon them and they remain incarcerated for several years. Anyone who supports
such tribals and questions the policies of the state are branded as terrorists or anti-national. In such a situation, the judicial system
is their last hope. Hence, it is vital that the judiciary be allowed to carry on its functions in accordance with law and without any
interference from the police, it has said. That the dismissal coincides the recent briefing by the National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit
Doval for the Supreme Court Judges at a retreat at the National Judicial Academy, Bhopal, has led to concern among the observers. If
police excesses in the name of security concerns in conflict zones are to be tolerated by the judiciary, and the judiciary meekly accepts
such advice from the Government, then the signs are ominous, according to an activist lawyer, who has been fighting cases involving
civil liberties. The IAPL has alleged that executive interference in judiciary in this manner militates against the basic structure of the
Constitution which emphasises separation of powers and independence of judiciary. Lawyers point out that if the Executive is unhappy
wih Gwals decisions, it has the option to appeal against them in the higher courts. Dismissing a Judge, soley on the ground of his
decisions which were in favour of citizens, is inconsistent with the concept of independence of judiciary, they suggest. IAPL has called
upon all, especially those from the legal fraternity to resist these moves to prejudice the judiciary and also demanded the immediate
reinstatement of Prabhakar Gwal as the Sukma CJM. The press statement has been signed for IAPL, among others, by wellknown
advocate from Raipur, Sudha Bharadwaj.

Legal Notice to Chief Justice of India

To,

Honourable Chief Justice of India,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,

New Delhi.

Honourable Sir ,

Subject : Legal Notice to Chief Justice of India

Are Judges , Police PERFECT ? Satya Harishchandra ?

Hereby , I challenge Chief Justice of India in the exercise of my FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES as a citizen of india , that subject to
conditions I will legally prove the crimes of few judges , police , public servants within the government service and other criminals.
Is the CJI ready to book those criminals , traitors , anti nationals ?

Since 25 years I am appealing to apex court for justice concerning various public issues , no justice in sight but injustices meted out
one after another. But the same judges are SHAMELESSLY taking huge pay perks for years now are also poised to get almost
triple fold salary increase. Parasites feeding on Indian Public. Whenever questions of accountability are asked judges level
contempt charges against the questioner or police fix him in fake cases or he is silenced by threats , murders , denial of jobs , etc.
Since 25 years in many ways they are trying to silence me. Just take the recent example of Justice Karnan who leveled corruption
charges against specific judges with CJI. Instead of conducting a fair investigation into the matter , CJI tried to silence him by
serving him contempt notice.

Our Judges , Police are NOT Perfect Not Satya Harischandras . There are criminals as well as honest people side by side in
judiciary & police. We whole heartedly respect honest few in judiciary , police & public service. But we detest corrupt judges ,
corrupt police. Honest Judges & Police are not coming into open to prosecute their corrupt colleagues, why ? silenced ?

Criminalization of all wings of government has taken place , unfit people are in the positions of power. Corruption in judiciary , police ,
CBI , CVC , Public service is rampant. Now MAFIA is at work. Only few scandals , scams become public , many are buried. If one
criminal public servant is caught other public servant who is also a criminal conducts name sake investigation , gives report , clean
chit. Law courts rely on the government reports as evidences , courts are not bothered about credibility of reports or investigations. It is
quid pro quo. Therefore technically criminal public servants are never proved for their crimes & convicted , as investigation itself is not
fair.

A Crime may happen without the knowledge of police but cannt continue for years without the connivance of police. A Crime
reported to court cannt continue for years without connivance of judges.

At the bottom of the paper , I have given web sites about few ACB raids on government officials and unearthing of crores worth
property. How they have earned it , by misusing their official positions. Therefore government reports , records prepared by these
officials , investigations conducted by corrupt police are suspect. But Law courts in various cases , considers government reports ,
records , statements of government officials as sacrosanct . Therefore in many cases injustice is meted out by court , as they depend
on reports of corrupt government officials , corrupt police.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free
under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the
aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land himself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional
rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw.
They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of
Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants & Judges.

I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not.
They will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect
collusion with criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally
against you.

Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;

DLGLA/E/2013/00292

DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not
honoured by the government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants
are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer .
these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced
forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.

To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives
of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to
enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy legal immunity
privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont all
of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why dont all of you are not sending your statement about
the case to the police either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I
CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper. Even
Press accreditation to me as a web journalist is denied till date. there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath
of office. this amounts to public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.

1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages / losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO
CRORE ONLY.

9. You are responsible for crime cover ups mentioned in my RTI Appeals , PILs and continuation of those crimes unabated.

10. You are responsible for denial of information, which vindicates the crimes of powers that be.

11. You are responsible for physical assaults , murder attempts on me.

12. You are responsible for job denials to me at NIE , PES Engineering college , RBI Press , Mysore , Bangalore Courts.

13. You are responsible for my illegal retrenchment from RPG Cables , denial of medical care to me towards occupational health
problems.

14. You are responsible for denying me legal aid.

15. You are responsible for illegal closure of my news paper.

16. You are responsible for denial of press accreditation to me as a web journalist till date.

17. You are responsible for repeatedly passing on my appeals to police. So that they can take statements , close the file under the
threat of police power.

18. You have violated my Human Rights & Fundamental Rights.

19. In terms of Integrity , Honesty You & other public servants are nowhere near Baba Saheb B R Ambedkar , Mahatma Gandhi &
Satya Harishchandra . Many Public servants are UNFIT to be in their posts.

You are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you cannt be legally prosecuted
for the above mentioned crimes . If you dont answer it will be admission of the charges by you. It will amount to
confession of crimes on your own.

If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of
wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the
complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for
questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies .
if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the
jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate
will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me ,
this complaint is & will be effective.

if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to
survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian
Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty
judges , police officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.

Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Send reply to :

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Editor , SOS e Voice for Justice & SOS e Clarion of Dalit,

LIG 2 , NO 761 , HUDCO First Stage,

Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal ,

Mysuru 570017.

Date : 05.03.2017..yours sincerely,

Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Editorial : Ugly Face of Indian Judiciary

How can a common citizen can get justice at the hands of these type of ugly , greedy Indian judges ? We have shown
with examples of actual cases how a case can be manipulated from FIR registration stage to judgment pronouncement
stage. These are only sample cases , tip of ice berg , many are buried underneath.

Hereby , we appeal to honest few in Indian judiciary , to legally prosecute their corrupt colleagues.

Yours

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Gujarat court issues warrants against President of India , CJI

Jan 28, 2004,

NEW DELHI: Be you ever so high, you can still be made an accused at Rs 40,000 in Gujarat. That's what's been done to people like
President A P J Abdul Kalam, Chief Justice of India V N Khare, a sitting Supreme Court judge B P Singh and five times president of the
apex court bar association R K Jain.

"What is happening in Gujarat? By giving Rs 40,000 you can get a judicial order?" CJI Khare wondered on Wednesday as a news
channel journalist Vijay Shekhar handed over copies of the video tapes exposing rampant corruption in a Ahemdabad metropolitan
magistrate's court.

"If this is the state of affairs, only God knows what will happen to the country," said an anguished CJI Khare against whom the
magistrate had issued bailable warrants to appear before him in a criminal case on February 17.

Shekhar said he obtained warrants on the genuine addresses of President Kalam, CJI Khare, Justice Singh and former Supreme Court
bar association president Jain. But their designations were not disclosed in the complaint which the lawyers had arranged for issuing
the warrants on January 15.

Three local lawyers--Narendra Choudhry, Iqbal Katia and Harish Bhanwaniwala (president of the Meghni Nagar courts)-- had helped
him secure bailable warrants, journalist said.

Shekhar had told lawyer that he wanted to settle score with his business rivals--Kalam, CJI Khare, Justice Singh and Jain.

Magistrate's name is not disclosed in the petition.

A Bench of CJI Khare, Justices S B Sinha and S H Kapadia ordered the Gujarat High Court registrar general to immediately seize and
seal the file from the magistrate of court No. 10, Meghani Nagar, Ahmedabad.

It asked the registrar general to send the file to the Supreme Court at the earliest as it will hear the public interest petition on Thursday.

Petitioner's counsel Harish Salve said the warrants were issued in connection with a case titled Suresh Kumar Jethalal Sanghavi vs
Rajendra Kumar Jain and others under section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code at a cost of
Rs 40,000.

Salve said the original tape of the sting operation, an edited copy of the recording, all the four warrants in original, a certified copy of the
order dated January 15 passed by the metropolitan magistrate court No.10, Meghani Nagar, Ahmedabad and the original receipt issued
by the `nazir' of the said court towards deposit of the requisite fee for issuance of certified copies of the order.

The tv channel wanted to telecast the tape but Salve had advised them not to do so before the matter was brought to the notice of the
court.

What had prompted Shekhar to conduct the sting operation? It was after coming to know that a large number of businessmen having
disputes were taking undue advantage of the criminal process of the judicial system by filing false and concocted criminal complaints to
harass their business rivals for vested interests.

In order to test the ``brazenness' that he chose the four names of persons with whom he assumed any lawyer and particularly judicial
officer would be easily familiar with.

Five AP judges caught cheating in law exam

Last updated: 26 August, 2010

Hyderabad, Aug 26 (PTI)

In a major embarrassment for the Andhra Pradesh judiciary, five judges were caught cheating while writing the LLM (Master of Law)
examination for which they were promptly suspended by the High Court.

One of the judges was found copying from a law book hidden under his answer sheet. Written slips and pages torn from textbooks were
seized from other judges.All the materials were confiscated by university invigilators who stopped the judges from writing any further.

The five judges were caught copying by the invigilators during the first-year LLM examson August 24 at the Kakatiya University's Arts
College in Warangal town, about 150 km from here, a senior court official said.

According to N Manohar, the university's additional controller of examinations, the candidates were taking their examinations in Room
No 102 when a team headed by him made a surprise visit.

The judges were caught on camera copying from books, smuggled notes, and each other.

After a report was received from the Kakatiya University, Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court Mohammad Kakru placed the
five judges under suspension pending inquiry against them, the official said.

The suspended judges are Ajitsimha Rao, Vijender Reddy, M Kistappa, Srinivasachary and Hanumantha Rao.If they had passed the
LLM examinations, they would have been eligible for promotions and increments. Two others, both advocates were also caught
copying.

"It doesn't matter whether or not they are judges. They were indulging in malpractices and we have booked cases against them," says
Dayakar Rao, the Principal of the university said.
The Warangal Bar Association said the whole episode was a blot on the judiciary. "The judiciary is the final recourse for common people
to get justice - and if the judges indulge in this kind of malpractice, how can you trust the judgment of the courts?" asked Ravi Kumar of
the association.

A woman judge in India has accused a superior judge of sexual harassment.

New Delhi, Aug 4/Nationalturk A woman judge in India has quit her job after alleging a sexual harassment by a superior judge, who
had also asked her to dance on an item song.

A woman additional judge in Gwalior in Indian state of Madhya Pradesh has alleged sexual harassment by a senior judge of the local
High Court.

According to the victim, the judge constantly pestered her and once sent her a message through an official to perform dance on an
item song at a function at his home.

When I spurned the judges various advances and malicious aspirations, he targeted me professionally, the woman judge said in her
complaint to Indian president Pranab Mukherjee, Chief Justice of India R M Lodha and Indian Law minister.

For spurning advances of the superior judge, she was transferred to a remote area.

Finally, the woman judge failed to cope up with the pressure and resigned on July 15.

I was left with no option but to resign: Victim

In her complaint she said she was left with no option but to resign. I resigned on July 15 in compelling, humiliating and disgraceful
circumstances to save my dignity, womanhood, self-esteem and career of my daughter.

If this is how a mother, sister and wife can be treated, who is herself no less than a judicial officer duty-bound to protect society and
law, what constitutional goals are we serving, said the victim, who headed a committee against sexual harassment, in her complaint to
president and chief justice of India written on August 1.

Meanwhile, Chief Justice of India has assured action after he receives the complaint.

I will seek a report from the Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court and take action accordingly. I will do my best for the
institution, Chief Justice of India RM Lodha was quoted as saying by Indian TV news channel, NDTV.

Himachal Pradesh: Judge suspended for sexual harassment

First of its kind incident in the state's judiciary has come as a big embarrassment for the High Court and senior judges in Himachal
Pradesh.

August 14, 2015

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has suspended a Chief Judicial Magistrate on charges of sexual harassment of a colleague of same
rank.

A senior official of the High Court on Thursday confirmed that an inquiry has been instituted in this regard by Chief Justice Mansoor
Ahmad Mir, who has a taken strong exception to the alleged conduct of the accused judge, terming it as an embarrassment for the
entire judicial fraternity.

The woman judge is learnt to have alleged that she was sexually harassed ahead of a three-day national conference on drug abuse
held in Manali from June 11 to 13. The conference was attended by Supreme Court judges and HC judges from different states.
Sources said the alleged incident happened on June 8.

The woman judge, who was part of an official team that was looking into the arrangements for the conference in Manali, has reportedly
alleged she was asked by the accused judge to accompany him to a resort in Manali. She also alleged that the colleague harassed and
teased her.

The woman judge is learnt to have submitted a written complaint in this regard. The accused judge, who is posted in Kullu, has
reportedly filed a counter-complaint against the woman judge.

Nothing but the truth

By Indira Jaising

A midst the rising din of the demand for death penalty for rapists comes the news that three judges of the Karnataka High Court have
been involved in what has come to be described as a 'sex scandal' on the outskirts of Mysore at a place called Roost Resorts.

Our attention is now directed to those who dispense justice rather than those who knock at the doors of justice. In both cases, we are
talking about the use and abuse of women those who are victims of sexual abuse, and those who are used as sexual objects,
willingly or unwillingly.

After the reports in local newspapers that three high court judges were found with women at a resort, there was the usual crop of
denials. Although the Mysore police were called in to settle a brawl, on being told that the persons in question were judges they said
that they heard no evil and saw no evil.

And everyone thought the matter ended there.

Attempts to get the names of the judges or of the women in question drew a blank. The bar association also drew a blank as most
people said, "Don't quote me but"

On November 30, the Bangalore edition of The Times of India published a front-page story giving the names and photographs of the
three judges and confirming that the Intelligence Bureau had done an investigation and come to the conclusion that the incident had
indeed occurred. There were still no details of the incident, though it was stated that the report has been given to the chief justice of
India.

There were reports on the same day that the Karnataka High Court chief justice had sought the transfer of the three judges to Patna,
Jammu and Kashmir and Guwahati. Apparently, the chief justice has agreed to this request and the transfer orders have been issued.

Then came the news that the chief justice of India has set up a committee of inquiry under the 'in-house' procedure consisting of the
chief justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the chief justice of the Madras High Court and the chief justice of the Patna High Court.

There were still no details in the press about the actual incident and the entire episode continued to be referred to as a 'sex scandal'.

What is interesting about these reports is not what they reveal, but what they conceal. It is a conspiracy of silence. If the information is
now available to the chief justice of India, why is it not being made public? Do we, the public, not have the right to information?
Ironically, the morning newspapers brought the news that the Freedom of Information Act has been passed. What are the legitimate
limits of the right to freedom of information and the requirement of keeping information a secret? This episode would make an
interesting case study.

What exactly is at stake here? There is much that should concern the nation about the incident. This is not a case about the private
morality of the judges, be that as it may, but about the abuse of office that they hold. What has not been made known is that the three
women in question are women lawyers practising in their courts.

What is at stake here is the pollution of the stream of justice at its very source. There must be countless cases in which these women
appeared before these very judges day in and day out of their routine practice. Can one honestly say that in such a situation justice is
being done "without fear or favour"? Judges swear on oath of allegiance to "bear true faith" to the Constitution and do justice "without
fear or favour". How well have these judges honoured this oath?

What is at stake here is the cynical use of women as sexual commodities. The usual justifications have already begun making the
rounds. If the women have not complained, what objection can anyone else have, it is asked. What is lost sight of is the fact that the
judges are in a position of dominance vis--vis the women, in a position to do favours that pertain to their office.

What is at stake here is the cynical use of public office, the seat of justice, for personal petty gain. It is irrelevant whether the women
consented or not. The usual blame game will now begin blaming the victim rather than the perpetrator; the usual loose talk about the
character of the woman in question; the usual attempt to cover up by diverting attention from the actual incident to the motives of those
who brought the incident to light.

What is at stake here is the perception of women as sexual commodities by those who are responsible for sitting in judgment over
cases brought for and on behalf of women.

The issues at stake here concern one half of Indians. With what faith can Indian women approach the courts demanding the right to
equality, the right to be free from sexual harassment or rape and the right to live with dignity, if the persecution of judges who sit in
judgment over them is non-negotiable?

In the circumstances, the suggested solution is worse than the offence to transfer them to Patna, Guwahati and Jammu and
Kashmir. Why these particular cities? Are they not an integral part of the country, or are they mere islands within the country that are
considered 'punishment postings' where people are sent a la 'crossing Kala Pani' of the old days? To the credit of the Guwahati Bar
Association, it protested against the proposed transfer.

The only decent thing to do is for the chief justice of India to disclose full details of the incident so that rumour-mongering comes to an
end. This would be in the best interest of the judiciary itself.

As things stand, the rumours are making the rounds that there were more than three judges involved, that the women were professional
call girls, many of which are baseless. We, the people, have the right to know. The conspiracy of silence must be broken.

The judges in question must neither be assigned any judicial functions pending an inquiry nor be transferred to sit in judgment over
others. Two of the judges are stated to be additional judges. They must not be confirmed. If there is prima facie evidence against the
one remaining judge, the chief justice must recommend his impeachment.

It is time for all concerned bar associations, bar councils and other male-dominated bodies of legal professionals to act and ensure that
there is no cover-up. There is little point in showing sympathy to women in judgments and in seminar rooms, or in recommending the
death penalty for rape if we cannot deal with the men who dispense justice.
There are contempt of court petitions pending in the Karnataka High Court against some of the publications for disclosing details of the
incident. Civil society and women's organisations must demand that justice is now done when it comes to the judges themselves.

The law of contempt can offer no solution to the crisis of credibility in the judiciary that this incident has thrown up. One positive aspect
of the incident is that it is only after the chief justice of the high court issued a public notice inviting information that he received 20
representations, which led to the discovery of the truth.

Let the truth now be made public.

Judge accused of molesting 2 rape survivors in UP

A sitting judicial magistrate sexually assaulted them

UP: Two rape victims claim that a sitting judicial magistrate sexually assaulted them. The girls

alleged that when they went to the magistrates chamber to give their statement, he allegedly

made them strip and molested them.

One of the girls is a minor and the police have filed a complaint. The girls also claimed that the

judge threatened them to not speak of the incident to anyone.

Lawyers and the general public in Gonda launched a protest against the judge.

JUDGE SENDING OBSCENE SMS TO WOMEN

Lucknow Taking cognisance of the allegation against a civil Judge (junior division) of

Budaun court that he sent obscene SMSes to a woman lecturer, the Registrar General of

Allahabad High Court today sought a report from the district judge into the matter.

The civil judge of Gunnor sub-division court of Budaun Pramod Kumar Gangwar was

accused of sending obscene SMSes from his cellphone to a woman lecturer of Classic

College of Law, Bareilly. A lecturer of the same college, Vivek Gupta, was named in the FIR

lodged by the victim while Gangwars name surfaced in the primary investigation.

Registrar General Dinesh Gupta said, The district judge of Budaun has been asked to

send a detailed report into the allegations. Appropriate action would be taken on the basis

of the report.

District Judge Suresh Kumar Srivastava said, I have asked the Bareilly district police to

send a report about the matter. The report on the basis of the police inquiry would be sent

to the Allahabad High Court Registrar General.

I am not aware about the matter, as the Bareilly police did not intimate me before initiating

the probe against the civil judge. They should have informed me when they had received

any such complaint, the judge added.

Meanwhile, Bareilly CO II Raj Kumar, who is investigating the case, today recorded the

statement of the victim. I have collected the call details of the cellphone used for sending

the SMSes, but I have yet to get the address of the person who is subscriber of the SIM

card, he said.

The probe is on to verify if the accused in the case were present on the location recorded
in the call details when the SMSes were sent. The details of the findings of the

investigation would be sent to the Budaun district court to seek the direction, the CO

added.

Asked if the investigation was earlier conducted into the matter, Raj Kumar said, The SP

(Crime) had initiated probe into the matter, but I am not aware if the investigation had

reached to any conclusion.

The woman lecturer had lodged an FIR at the Mahila police station on Thursday alleging

she had received obscene SMSes on her cellphone involving her colleague Vivek Gupta.

The preliminary inquiry into the case by the police yesterday had found that the mobile

phone used in the crime belongs to the civil judge.

Lokayukta: DC demanded sex from widow

In the midst of a national outrage over former Haryana DGP SPS Rathore molesting a teenager,

the Karnataka Lokayukta on Saturday made a startling revelation that the state government was

shielding a top bureaucrat who had demanded sexual favours from a young widow.

Lokayukta Justice Santosh Hegde disclosed that the official concerned, who was the deputy

commissioner of one of the districts when he demanded sex from the widow in return for

discharging his duties as public servant, has since been promoted to a senior position.

Justice Hegde, in the course of an interaction with journalists at the Deccan Herald office

Saturday afternoon, said the unnamed widow had dared the deputy commissioner and

approached the Lokayuktas office with a complaint against the officer.

On examination of the complaint, the Lokayukta had found sufficient grounds to recommend to

the state government the suspension and prosecution of the DC concerned. The

recommendation was subsequently considered by the concerned department head as well as

the chief secretary and both endorsed it.

But, according to Justice Hegde, no action was initiated against the DC as the same official who

had endorsed the recommendation subsequently found no basis for initiating departmental action

against him. Instead, the official cleared the DCs name for promotion in the super-scale.

Presently, the official holds a senior position in the government.

The widow, in her late 20s, had approached the DC with a representation to sort out some

problems. But she was shocked when the DC demanded sex.

Justice Hegde did not identify the official in question or the complainant. Nor did he offer to name

the district where the official was serving as deputy commissioner. But the incident has

happened sometime in the course of last three years as Justice Hegde took over as the

Lokayukta in mid-2006.

3-year jail term for dirty judge

Family court judge Ramrao Gangaram Bhise attempted to get sexual favours from a housewife in

1997

Family court judge Ramrao Gangaram Bhises attempts to extract sexual favours, in addition to a

bribe, from a housewife, Alka Gaikwad who had sought an increase in her monthly

maintenance allowance from her estranged husband, in 1997 proved costly to him.

Pronouncing him guilty on both counts, the special court hearing anti-corruption bureau (ACB)

matters sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment and a collective fine of Rs55, 000,

on Monday.

According to the FIR in the case registered against Bhise by the ACB, Suryakant Gaikwad had

filed for divorce from his wife, Alka, before the Bandra family court. Alka, a housewife, in turn,

filed a petition seeking mutual cohabitation with her husband. The then family court judge, Meera

Khadakkar, directed the husband to pay her an interim maintenance allowance of Rs750 per

month.

Subsequently, in January 1997, Alka filed another application before the same family court (now

presided over by Bhise) seeking to increase the monthly maintenance amount to Rs3,500. On

October 27, 1997, Bhise issued an interim order, increasing the maintenance allowance to

Rs2,000 to be paid by Suryakan to his estranged wife till the disposal of the case. Immediately

after issuing the order, Bhise asked Alka to meet him and gave her his residential telephone

number, asking her to call him when the court hours ended. He told her that he would ask her

husband to pay her a lump sum of Rs2 lakh in addition to the monthly maintenance, provided she

called him up, the FIR states.

When she called up the judge at 7 pm the same day, Bhise told her that she would have to pay

him a sum of Rs2,000 in addition to granting his sexual favours if she wanted an order in her

favour. He also directed her to meet him at the Haji Ali bus stop with the bribe amount the

following evening.

Alka approached the ACB, which sought permission from the Chief Justice of the Bombay High

Court before laying a trap on the first class judicial magistrate (Bhise). The HC while granting the

permission designated a court official to bear witness to the events leading to the trap. Alka,

under video camera surveillance of ACB sleuths, along with the court official and other women

witnesses met Bhise at 8.30 pm at the Haji Ali bus stop. Bhise took hold of Alkas wrist and when

she protested, repeated his demands, the FIR states.

Alka was then taken to a nearby hotel, Sharda, where the judge accepted the bribe amount. But

before he could do anything else, ACB sleuths swooped in and arrested him.

Rajasthan judge is indicted for seeking sexual favours

Chief Justice of India G B Pattanaik retires tonight and he doesnt have much to write home about

on the unprecedented drive he launched to enforce judicial accountability.

After the PPSC scam fiasco, reported in The Indian Express today, comes the case of the

Rajasthan judge who has been indicted in a sex scandal and yet has escaped actionpending
another inquiry.

On December 14, a three-judge committee set up by Pattanaik confirmed the involvement of

Justice Arun Madan of the Rajasthan High Court in a proposition to a woman doctor to have sex

with him in exchange for a judicial favour.

The committee, headed by the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Justice B K

Roy, submitted its report to Pattanaik, indicting Madan on a complaint made from Jodhpur by the

woman concerned, Sunita Malviya.

But Pattanaik has not announced any action against Madan. When contacted by The Indian

Express, Pattanaik confirmed that the committee had indicted Madan and his bad reputation in

seeking sexual favours in return for judicial ones.

However, Pattanaik said that no action was being taken since the committee had also mentioned

allegations of corruption against Madan. And so he had ordered a further inquiry by the same

committee into the corruption charges.

When asked what he did with the indictment of Madan in the sex scandal, Pattanaik said, That

is on hold because I could not have taken piecemeal action against him.I am praying to God

that the final report will give some tangible material to take action.

Highly placed sources told The Indian Express that when the committee recorded statements last

week in Jodhpur of about 30 persons over four days, it also came to know of several allegations

of corruption against Madan and another judge of the same high court. The committee put these

on record as well.

Pattanaik said that when he summoned Madan to New Delhi last week, he did not raise the sex

scandal issue and instead limited himself to saying that he was ordering a further inquiry into

corruption allegations.

In effect, Pattanaik has now passed the Rajasthan buck to his successor Justice V N Khare.

The gist of Malviyas complaint is that Madan made a sexual proposition to her in October

through a deputy registrar of the high court, Govind Kalwani, who said that the judge would help

her, in turn, get out of a criminal case booked against her.

With this, Pattanaiks much-touted in-house judicial accountability seems to have hit a wall. The

first committees report into the PPSC scam exonerated one judge despite evidence and let two

others off with a mere slap on the wrist. The third committee is now busy probing the involvement

of judges in the Mysore sex scam.

Porbandar judge accused of dowry harassment

A complaint has been filed against District and Sessions judge of Porbandar for allegedly

harassing his daughter-in-law for dowry, police said here on Sunday.

Darshana Dave, a native of Amreli, has filed a complaint against her husband Kinnar, father-inlaw

and district judge Arvind Dave, mother-in-law Pratibha and brother-in-law Prashant, the

police added.

Darshana married Kinnar two years ago. Her complaint says that she was harassed from the

beginning, and was even beaten up by the husband and in-laws, who were demanding Rs 10
lakh as dowry.

She has also alleged that she was thrown out of the house a few months back, and her husband

is now seeking divorce, the police said.

Amreli Superintendent of Police H R Muliyana confirmed to have received the complaint against

the judge and others. He said that action will be taken after verifying the complaint.

This is the second complaint related to dowry harassment filed against a judge in the state in the

recent past.

Earlier, a woman had filed a complaint against additional sessions judge of Jetpur after her

daughter and the judge's wife committed suicide.

Gurgaon judge to also face dowry harassment charge

Gurgaon's Chief Judicial Magistrate Ravneet Garg, booked for the murder of his wife, will also

face dowry harassment charge, police here said Monday.

Police have issued notices to the CJM's father K.K. Garg and mother Rachna Garg, who have

also been named in the dowry harassment case.

The CJM's father reached here Monday morning from Haryana's Panchkula town and contacted

police, who wanted to question him.

"We had called CJM's parents...K.K. Garg was questioned by special investigation team (SIT),"

Gurgaon Police Commissioner Alok Mittal said.

Mittal said on the basis of written complaint filed by the parents of the CJM's wife Geetanjali,

penal sections of dowry harassment and extra-marital affair were included in the FIR lodged

against the CJM Saturday.

Geetanjali, 24, bore three bullet wounds - on her chin, chest and stomach - but no bullets were

found in her body that was recovered here Thursday. The CJM's licensed firearm was found near

the body, police said.

Mittal said two bullets were seized from the scene of crime and would be sent for ballistic

examination Monday, a day after ballistic experts examined the crime spot.

"The SIT Sunday questioned two women relatives of Ravneet Garg for hours at his government

allotted house here in the Officers Colony," said Mittal.

"We have asked CJM to produce supporting evidences to prove his statement," he said.

The CJM allegedly said that his driver and domestic help may throw some light on his wife's

death.

Judge Garg's in-laws alleged that two cars were provided to the accused on his and his family's

demand. Rs.2 lakh were also delivered to him at the time of the admission of his daughters in

school in May.

Geetanjali's brother Pradeep Aggarwal Saturday lodged a first information report against Garg

and his parents, accusing them of murder.

"Ravneet and Geetanjali got married in November 2007. Everything was fine for a few years but

the attitude of Ravneet and his parents towards Geetanjali started changing after she delivered
two baby girls (now aged around four and a half and three years)," Aggarwal said in his

complaint.

He demanded a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into his sister's murder.

sexual harassment: Intern moves SC for inquiry against Justice Swatanter Kumar

New Delhi: A former law intern, who has made sexual harassment allegations against Justice Swatanter Kumar, today moved the
Supreme Court seeking inquiry against the retired judge.

A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam, before whom the matter was mentioned for urgent hearing, agreed to take up the case
on January 15.

The intern, in the petition, challenged the apex court's December 5, 2013 full court resolution in which it was decided that no complaint
against its retired judges will be entertained.

The petitioner also submitted that a proper forum be constituted to conduct inquiry in such cases and her complaint be also looked into
by the apex court like it was done in the case of sexual harassment allegations against Justice (retd) A K Ganguly.

The intern has made Justice Kumar, Secretary General of the Supreme Court and Union of India parties in the case.

She submitted that Justice Kumar was a sitting judge at the time of the alleged incident and the apex court must look into the complaint
as per Vishaka guidelines.

Justice Kumar, who is currently heading the National Green Tribunal, has described the allegations as "incredulous and false" and
"some kind of conspiracy".

IB confirms Mysore Roost Resort sex scandal

The Intelligence Bureau has provided the Centre with a detailed account of the escapade

involving three Karnataka High Court judges on November 3 in a resort on the outskirts of

Mysore, highly placed sources told The Times of India on Friday.

According to a senior official, Most of the information sought has not only confirmed the veracity

of the incident but the government has crosschecked it with another police agency. Both the

reports match.

The incident was widely reported in the media. What has surprised the Centre is the dogged

refusal of the Karnataka police to confirm the incident. Mysore Police Commissioner C.

Chandrasekhar first denied that the incident ever took place. Only when a public notice was

issued through the high court registrar seeking information on the Mysore scandal, did the facts

come out in the open. Public protest helped a lot, says the source.

What transpired at the resort, says the source, cannot be expected from anyone in civil society,

leave alone persons sworn to upholding the law. According to him, The IB report consists of

unmentionable facts and also makes it amply clear that the Mysore incident is not the first time

such things have happened. Can anyone expect upholders of the law to pick a fight with people

who complained to the police when caught in a compromising position?

In a related development, Karnataka High Court Chief Justice N.K. Jain has written to Chief

Justice of India Justice G.B. Pattanaik asking that three judges be transferred. Jain has proposed

that Justice N.S. Veerabhadraiah be transferred to the Patna High Court, Justice

Chandrasekharaiah to Jammu & Kashmir and Justice V. Gopala Gowda to the Gauhati High
Court.

While Jain is understood not to have given any reasons, highly placed sources say the proposal

for transfers is linked to the Mysore incident.

However, the source says that now the government is worried about the appropriate remedial

measures. In such cases, transferring a judge to a remote high court doesnt always work. He

says, Bar associations and the people of northeastern states were up in arms when some

judges of the Punjab and Haryana high courts were transferred there. We expect similar protests

if the CJI accepts Justice Jains proposal to transfer the three judges of the Karnataka High

Court.

The Bar Council of India on Friday, while expressing its anguish at the Karnataka incident, called

for follow-up action.

Unless prompt and appropriate action is taken, it will erode the faith of public in the only

institution considered to be the bastion of our fighting faith in democracy, it said in a statement.

The BCI has lamented inaction in this case by the higher judiciary and the government.

Panel names former India Supreme Court judge Ganguly in sex harassment allegation

Shocked, shattered by allegations: former Supreme Court judge Ganguly

New Delhi: A three-member panel that probed the charge of sexual harassment of a young lawyer by a Supreme Court judge has
submitted its report, identifying the judge as A K Ganguly, court sources said on Friday.

The report was submitted on Thursday after the committee of three judges met six times. This is the first time an alleged perpetrator
has been named.

The report, submitted to Chief Justice P Sathasivam, also carries the statements of the victim, who interned in the Supreme Court, and
that of the now-retired Justice Ganguly, the sources said.

The graduate of Kolkata-based National University of Judicial Sciences (NUJS) had alleged sexual harassment by Ganguly while
interning for him in December 2012.

The committee, which held six sittings on November 13, 19, 21, 26, and 27, submitted its report to Chief Justice Sathasivam on
November 28.

The victim appeared before the committee on November 19 and was expected to appear again on November 21 but chose to stay
away.

She first mentioned the incident in a blog for Journal of Indian Law and Society on November 6 and later told the same in an interview
with Legally India website.

The victim, who is working with Natural Justice: Lawyers for Communities and Environment, said she heard that there were three other
girls besides her who were sexually harassed by the same judge.

She also claimed to have knowledge of four more girls who were allegedly harassed by other judges in their chambers.

Denying any sexual harassment, Ganguly on Friday said he was shocked and shattered by the charges against him.

I am denying everything. I have told the committee that all the allegations levelled by the intern are wrong. I dont know how such
allegations have been levelled against me, he said.

I am a victim of situations, he told television channels.

I am not ashamed of anything, he said in reply to a question regarding the alleged episode which came out in public after the victim
spoke about it in the legal portal earlier this month.

He said the charges against him were totally wrong. The girl had not raised any sexual harassment issue with him, he said, adding that
he had not done any physical harm to her.

The former judge said the intern worked with him though she was not officially allocated to him. She came in the place of another intern
who had gone abroad after marriage. I never put up a poster. She came on her own.

He said the girl had come to his house on a number of occasions in connection with work.
Judge issues memo to lady office assistant for not washing his innerwear

Chennai: Disgusting but true, a judge in Tamil Nadu sent a memo to a court employee threatening her of disciplinary action as the latter
refused to wash innerwear piled up in his house. However, the judge refusing to budge down to criticism has justified his move by
stating that office assistants are "meant for menial work".

A subordinate judge in Erode, Justice Selvam forced his 47-year-old office assistant to apologise in writing and assure that she would
not repeat her "lapse".

The memo, dated February 1 reads: "Please explain within 7 days why disciplinary action should not be initiated against you for your
failure to wash the innerwear which were put for washing in the sub-judge's house, and for throwing them away disgustingly, and when
your attitude was questioned by the officer and his wife for retorting in an arrogant tone," the note said.

Those close to the woman say the lady, who is a mother of two daughters and the only earning member of the family was hired as an
assistant at the court but was forced to sweep, wash, cook and serve at the judge's home.

Many say that the lady is verbally abused by the judge's wife.

Justice Selvam is quoted in NDTV saying that he has done nothing wrong.

"She is an Officer's Assistant appointed to do menial work. I had given only my vest and not underwear. It's clearly given in the Judicial
Officers' Association guidelines," he said.

Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister

Dhananjay Mahapatra| TNN | Sep 17, 2010,

NEW DELHI: Former law minister Shanti Bhushan on Thursday created a sensation in the Supreme Court when he moved an
application accusing eight former Chief Justices of India of "corruption", and dared the court to send him to jail for committing "contempt
of court".

The eight allegedly corrupt CJIs feature among a list of 16 prepared by Bhushancomprising Justices Ranganath Mishra, K N Singh,
M H Kania, L M Sharma, M N Venkatachalliah, A M Ahmadi, J S Verma, M M Punchhi, A S Anand, S P Bharucha, B N Kirpal, G B
Patnaik, Rajendra Babu, R C Lahoti, V N Khare and Y K Sabharwal. Terming eight among the list as "definitely corrupt", Bhushan put
their names in a sealed cover and submitted it to the Supreme Court and virtually dared it to open it and read out the contents.

He said of the 16 on his list, "six were definitely honest and about the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether
they were honest or corrupt".

The veteran lawyer, who became famous by successfully arguing for setting aside the election of Indira Gandhi in 1975, triggering a
chain of events leading to imposition of Emergency, resorted to the dramatic action in solidarity with his son, lawyer Prashant Bhushan,
who is facing contempt charges for accusing current CJI S H Kapadia and his predecessors of misconduct.

"Make me a party along with Prashant Bhushan," requested Bhushan Sr, who was law minister in the post-Emergency Morarji Desai
cabinet, as he challenged the SC to send him to jail for contempt.

Bhushan's challenge to the SC can put the apex court in a bind. It may be constrained not to ignore the provocation lest it start a trend.
The option of punishing the Bhushans, however, carries the risk of putting the father-son duo on a pedestal, and training the spotlight
on their allegations when the issue of judicial corruption finds ready resonance with an expanding constituency. Of all the protests
against alleged judicial corruption, the Bhushans's is easily the most breathtaking, and will play well with the gallery.
Bhushan sought to raise for judiciary the cost of any punishment to him, by saying that he was ready to face the consequences. "The
applicant will consider it a great honour to spend time in jail for making an effort to get for the people of India an honest and clean
judiciary," he said.

In his application, the former law minister spoke of both the growing corruption in judiciary as well as the tendency to sweep it under the
carpet in the name of protecting judiciary's reputation.

A defiant Bhushan claimed that two former CJIs were among the sources of his information on corruption among their peers. "In fact,
two former CJIs had personally told the applicant while they were in office that their immediate predecessor and immediate successor
were corrupt judges. The names of these four CJIs are included in the list of corrupt CJIs," Bhushan said.

"Unless the level of corruption in the judiciary is exposed and brought in the public domain, the institutions of governance cannot be
activated to take effective measures to eliminate the evil," he added.

"It is a common perception that whenever such efforts are made by anyone, the judiciary tries to target him by the use of the power to
contempt. It is the reputation of the judge which is his shield against any malicious and false allegations against him. He does not need
the power of contempt to protect his reputation and credibility," Bhushan further said.

Proceedings against Prashant were initiated on a petition filed by amicus curiae Harish Salve accusing the former of making
contemptuous remarks against CJI S H Kapadia and former CJIs. Besides, Bhushan Jr had also told a web newspaper that half of the
last 16 former CJIs were corrupt.

His father, Shanti Bhushan said, "Since the applicant (Shanti Bhushan) is publicly stating that out of the last 16 CJIs, eight of them were
definitely corrupt, he also needs to be added as a respondent to this contempt petition so that he is also suitably punished for this
contempt."

Corruption in judiciary had taken firm root in the last two to three decades, Bhushan said while deploring persistent attempts to cover up
in the belief that such charges might tarnish the image of the judiciary.

Assailing the Supreme Court's decision in 1991 in the Justice Veeraswamy case restraining probe agencies from registering FIR
against any judge without the permission of the CJI, Bhushan said this had resulted in total immunity to corrupt judges and caused
judicial corruption to increase by leaps and bounds.

Rs 100 crore offered for Gali Janardhan Reddys bail: Arrested judge

More skeletons are tumbling out in the murky cash-for-bail scam involving mining baron and former Karnataka minister Gali Janardhan
Reddy as a lower court judge, arrested in the case, disclosed to the ACB that Gali's men were ready to offer as much as a staggering
Rs 100 crore to secure bail for him. Earlier, the deal amount was put at Rs 15 crore.

T Lakshminarasimha Rao, the arrested judge, disclosed that Dasaradharami Reddy, a relative of Gali, had made the Rs 100 crore offer,
according to the confession statement recorded by the ACB. Krishna Prasad, an auditor, who is known to him and another relative M
Venkateswara Rao approached Lakshminarasimha Rao in the second week of April with a request to look for a `channel' to influence
the CBI judge for Gali's release on bail. "They were in touch with Dasaradharami Reddy who was willing to pay even Rs 100 crore for
securing the bail," the confession statement of Rao said. Though the deal initially came as a shock to the arrested judge, who at the
time was registrar (enquiries), high court, he was later attracted towards the deal, it said.

Lakshminarasimha Rao called the CBI court judge B Nagamaruti Sarma to his residence on April 18 and tried to convince him on
granting of bail to Gali. Sarma did not agree for the deal and went away rejecting the offer. He had, in fact, dismissed the bail plea.
Then another person Raavi Surya Prakash Babu, a real estate dealer, who was taken to Bellary MLA Sriramulu by his associate Kolli
Lakshmaiah Chowdary for striking the deal, approached Rao again. Surya Prakash had already met Sriramulu's nephew and Kampli
MLA T H Suresh Babu who, too, was trying to secure bail for Gali and advised him to wait as Nagamaruti Sarma was not of 'their type'.
But he requested Lakshminarasimha Rao to keep the `channel' open as the deal was "too lucrative to be ignored".

Later, in a strange sequence of events, Nagamaruti Sarma was shifted out of CBI court and a fresh bail plea was filed which came
before another special judge T Pattabhirama Rao. Lakshminarasimha Rao roped in Pattabhi's batchmate D Prabhakar Rao, another
district judge, who was with the state election commission as its secretary (legal). He also tried to push the deal but failed as Pattabhi
told him that he would decide the matter on only `merit'. It turned out later that Pattabhi chose a 'route' planned by his friend Chalapati
though the deal was only for Rs 5 crore. This was mainly because his friend did not put any precondition that he should meet Gali
Somasekhara Reddy, brother of Gali Janardhana Reddy, before giving bail as was done by Prabhakar Rao, who was also arrested in
the case. Prabhakar in his confession spoke of only Rs 15 core implying that he too was unaware of the whopping Rs 100-crore deal.
While the ACB arrested Lakshminarasimha Rao on July 12, Pattabhi was arrested last month.

Interestingly, the ACB sleuths seized some cheques bearing the names of Lakshminarasimha Rao's family members with some
complaint letters written by advocates against some AP high court judges. The letters were addressed to the President of India.

CASH FOR JUDGEMENT

Chandigarh, August 22: Punjab and Haryana High Court Judge Nirmal Yadav who has gone on leave after her name is said to have
figured in the statements of the main accused in the case involving the delivery of cash at another High Court Judges house, said
today that she was a victim of a vilification campaign. Speaking to The Indian Express at her Sector 24 residence here today, Justice
Yadav said that some influential persons were trying to shift the focus on her to save the real accused. Justice Yadav denied that
former Haryana Additional Advocate General Sanjeev Bansal had talked to her on phone on August 13 when Bansals clerk
mistakenly delivered a bag containing Rs 15 lakh to the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, another sitting Judge of the High Court.

Let any agency prove that I talked to Sanjeev Bansal on phone either on that day or any day in the past one month, Justice Yadav
said. I am ready to face all consequences if this allegation is found true. I have had no dealings with Bansal. I have not received any
money from Bansal or any of his associates. I am sure I will get justice. Justice Yadav said she had explained her position to High
Court Chief Justice T S Thakur and had proceeded on leave. She said she would not hear any case until her name is cleared.

Sources close to her said that during her meeting with Justice Thakur yesterday evening, in which some other senior judges were also
present, Justice Yadav offered to proceed on leave to maintain the highest traditions of Indian judiciary. Justice Thakur told The Indian
Express that he had not asked Justice Yadav to proceed on leave and that it was her own decision. It is learnt that in her meeting with
Justice Thakur, Yadav vehemently denied any role in the entire role. While acknowledging that she and some other members of her
family had bought a plot of 11.1 bighas of land (see accompanying story) at village Rihun Pargana near Kumharhatti in Solan district of
Himachal Pradesh on August 14, Yadav is learnt to have denied that the money for purchasing the land came from Bansal or Ravinder
Singh, the Delhi businessman, who is also named in the case.

Cant a judge buy legal property? Let the police or any other investigating agency prove that the money for the deal was provided by
Bansal or Singh, she is learnt to have told the Chief Justice. But she is learnt to have acknowledged, in her meeting with the Chief
Justcie, that she knew Ravinder Singh. She is learnt to have said that she came to know him through some other judges.

Meanwhile, highly placed sources in the High Court confirmed that Chief Justice Thakur is awaiting the return of Chief Justice of India
KG Balakrishnan from Brazil to apprise him of the developments in the case. The Chief Justice is learnt to have asked the
administrative committee, comprising senior judges, to monitor the case on a daily basis.

The Rs 15-lakh delivery: Story So Far

August 13: Parkash Ram, an assistant to Haryanas Additional Advocate General Sanjeev Bansal, delivers a parcel containing Rs 15
lakh at the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Justice Kaur calls the police.

Rajeev Gupta, Bansals friend and a property dealer, tells the police that the money reached there by mistake and it was meant for
Nirmal Singh, another property dealer. Chandigarh Police decline to hand over the cash. Bansal is questioned

August 16: A case is registered against Bansal, Parkash Ram and Delhi- based hotelier Ravinder Singh who allegedly organised the
money

Bansal resigns as Addl AG and surrenders on August 19

August 21: Rajeev Gupta, the property dealer who claimed the money was meant for Nirmal Singh, is arrested. The Inspector General
of Police sends a report to the Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court. The report says that the money was meant for another
judge.

August 22: Justice Nirmal Yadav proceeds on leave

Caught in controversy is Solan plot that judge, 16 others purchased

CHANDIGARH, SOLAN, August 22: On August 14, according to revenue records, a plot measuring 11.1 bighas in Solan was
purchased by Justice Nirmal Yadav and others for Rs 5, 52, 500. Details of the transaction, obtained by The Indian Express, show that
the land was purchased by her and 16 others from six persons, all residents of village Rihun Pargana, near Kumharhatti in the Solan
district of Himachal Pradesh.

This purchase is said to have figured in the meeting between Justice Yadav and the High Court Chief Justice yesterday. Justice Yadav
is said to have told the Chief Justice: Cant a judge buy legal property? Let the police or any other investigating agency prove that the
money for the deal was provided by (Sanjeev) Bansal or Ravinder Singh. The purchasers and sellers obtained permission from the
Himachal Pradesh Government under Section 118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy Act. Solan Naib Tehsildar N S Chauhan has
confirmed on record that that the deal had been registered as per the details we have. The land was sold by residents of village
including Baldev; Narinder Kumar; Surinder Kumar; Rajinder Kumar; Bimla Devi and Amar Singh. The sellers have given a General
Power of Attorney to Surinder Kumar (one of the partners among the sellers), who executed a sale agreement in favour of the buyers.
Those named as purchasers (partners) in the land deal include Suruchi, a resident of House no. 3, Sector 14, Gurgaon; Trisha
Chaudhary; Ram Niwas; Rajender Yadav; Chiranjeev; Latika; Deepak; Sunita; Vivek; Capt. NT Puri; Devinder Singh; Shakuntla; Kuldip
Singh Yadav; Ajay Yadav; Sushank Puri; Mohit (all residents of house no. 1111, Sector 11, Panchkula) and Punjab and Haryana High
Court Justice Nirmal Yadav.

In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by SC judges, Congress

Feb 17, 2017

New Delhi: Late Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul had named some sitting as well as former Supreme Court judges and
senior Congress politicians in a 60-page suicide letter he left behind at the time of his death last August. His wife has demanded a CBI
probe into the corruption charges levelled by Pul. "We want a central investigation agency -- the CBI or the National Investigation
Agency -- to investigate the case. Every politician and judge named in the letter should be brought into limelight and action taken
against them for demanding bribe," his wife Dangwimsai Pul told the media here.

The suicide note written by Kalikho Pul in Hindi mentions the names of several Congress politicians both at the Centre and in Arunachal
Pradesh along with Supreme Court judges, including ex-Chief Justices of India H.L Dattu and Altamas Kabir, for demanding bribe.
Dangwimsai -- the first wife of Pul -- has demanded a new FIR in the case as the state government did not probe the death of Pul
"properly", despite an FIR by the family. She alleged the current state government threatened her against demanding a CBI probe. On
being asked who was threatening them, Dangwimsai told IANS: "I can't take the names, but certainly they are people close to the
ministers in the current Arunachal government." In his 60-page suicide note, a copy of which is with IANS, Pul said H.L. Dattu was
allegedly paid Rs 28 crore in 2012 to stay an order against the former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Nabam Tuki, despite the
Gauhati High Court ordering a CBI inquiry against Tuki after finding him guilty. Similarly, another ex CJI Altamas Kabir had given a
decision in favour of Arunachal contractors regarding a Public Distribution System (PDS) scam. The Central government and Food
Corporation of India termed the decision wrong, he alleged in the letter. Pul also alleges that on the directions of former Chief Minister
Dorjee Khandu, he in 2009 had given Rs 6 crore to President Pranab Mukherjee, then Union Finance Minister. Mukherjee was paid the
money after he cleared an advance loan of Rs 200 crore to Arunachal Pradesh. "In 2008, I, on the directions of Dorjee Khandu, was
compelled to give Rs 37 crore to Congress Treasurer Moti Lal Vora," said the suicide note. The suicide note which brings to light
several irregularities and scams in Arunachal Pradesh also mentions that Pul was contacted by some (unidentified) people, demanding
Rs 86 crore to give a SC ruling in his favour, an offer which Pul said he denied. Pul had become Chief Minister on February 19, 2016,
after he along with 29 (19 Congress and 11 BJP) MLAs defected to the People's Party of Arunachal Pradesh (PPA) -- a state outfit -- to
form a new government, bringing down the existing Congress government led by Chief Minister Tuki. However, the Supreme Court
reinstated the Tuki government on July 13, following which Pul and his supporters returned to the Congress and supported Pema
Khandu as the Chief Minister. According to the letter, Pul was contacted till 9 p.m on July 12, 2016, demanding an advance of Rs 9
crore to delay the hearing for one month. Pul was unseated from the chief ministership on July 13. The 47-year-old leader was found
hanging from a ceiling fan on August 9 in the official residence of the Chief Minister. He had yet to vacate the bungalow. The Arunachal
Police had found a 60-page letter written by Pul near his body, titled 'Mere Vichar' (My Views). The letter also accuses two sitting judges
of the Supreme Court of corruption. "Virender Khehar (relative of a serving judge), had asked for Rs 49 crore from me. In another case
Aditya Mishra (relative of another serving judge) had asked Rs 37 crore from me," said the letter. Mentioning extreme manipulations
through money in the Supreme Court while giving important verdicts, Pul said he was contacted till July 25, 2016 -- more than a week
after the July 13 verdict -- by the kin of a serving Supreme Court juge with an offer to change the decision of the Supreme Court in his
favour for Rs 31 crore. The suicide letter -- which appears to be written over a period of a month and with his signature on each page --
clearly expresses the frustration and helplessness of Pul towards the government and judiciary. In the letter, Pul has accused Arunachal
Chief Minister Pema Khandu and ex-CM Nabam Tuki as being among the few people responsible for bringing the state into financial
ruin. The suicide note states that the entire expenses of Rs 90 crore for the case -- to unseat him -- in the Supreme Court was borne by
former and current Chief Minister Nabam Tuki and Pema Khandu. The letter also names Congress leaders Kapil Sibal, Kamal Nath,
Ghulam Nabi Azad, Salman Khurshid and V. Narayanasamy as demanding money to resolve problems among the Congress legislators
in Arunachal Pradesh.

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

High Court Judges Favoring Land Mafia

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/hc-judges-favoring-mafia

PIL Fundamental Duties of Citizens Vs Corrupt Government Officials

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R

editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN
THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Fundamental Duties of Citizens and Constitutional Duties of Public Servants are complementary to each other. Nowadays
criminalization of politics , judiciary , police , etc has taken place and many unfit candidates are in public service. These corrupt , unfit
public servants are misusing their offices and putting legal seal on illegal acts , making those illegal acts technically legal. Here
raises the conflict between FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF AN INDIAN CITIZEN and ILLEGAL ACTS OF GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS.

For example real estate mafia grabs BEML Quarters lake , Kaynes Hootagalli Lake , Ningaih lake , Hebbal lakes in mysuru
creates fake title deeds and even gets it registered by sub registrar all with the help corrupt officials in government. Even police
protect the rich land grabber. When a case is made out in the court of law for eviction of lake encroachers , judge simply goes through
the technicalities of government documents. Based on official documents he gives a green signal to encroacher and orders for
protection of his encroached properties. Lakes are nobodys property , it is a public property and to be preserved for public usage.
The good Samaritan Indian Citizen who did his Fundamental Duties of Protecting Lakes lost money , time, faced abuses / remarks
from the judge , faced life threat from land mafia & police. All for nothing.

One more example , a citizen while passing through a public road witnesses an accident , takes the injured to the hospital for
emergency treatment to save life and informs police regarding accident making vehicle. Instead of appreciating his good work ,
police fits him in the case , case drags on for years making the good citizen loose his money , time & job. Also , he is threatened by
vehicle owner who made the accident , no protection to the citizen for doing his :Fundamental Duties.

One more example , a citizen complained to authorities regarding business of a liquor bar in a residential location much close
to religious building & schools. The bar owner had secured license from state excise department much against the norms. Police
called the good citizen for questioning repeatedly , court judge called him to court repeatedly and finally based on the license given by
corrupt government official allowed the bar to operate , fined the complainant. Goons of bar owner roughed up the good citizen
making him to move away from the locality itself.

An Indian citizen requests for information from authorities regarding llegalities , irregularities , misuse of office in working by
judges , police , etc from supreme court of india and other related authorities under RTI Act. So that based on RTI reply from
concerned authorities he can legally prosecute the guilty judges , police , public servants , can get the injustices rectified by court of
law and put an end to further crimes by those guilty , corrupt public servants all in public interest. This is an effort by that Indian citizen
as his FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to uphold law , constitution of india. But PIOs , RTI Appellate authorities of supreme court of india
& other bodies didnt give full truthful information at all . Thereby , they committed one more crime of of covering up another crime
and aiding criminals to continue with their crimes unabated. Thereby , guilty judges , police , other public servants obstructed the
citizen from performing his FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES , Violated his FUNNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS TO EQUITABLE
JUSTICE. No justice in sight till date to good Samaritan Indian citizen , more injustices were meted out to him by judges , police ,
public servants - he suffered physical assaults , murder attempts , jobs denied , news paper closed , press accreditation denied ,
PILS he sent to apex court were not admitted , all to silence him.

In this way , there are numerous cases of Indian Citizens , whistle blowers , RTI Activists , Journalists who themselves suffered
gross injustices for raising public causes , for doing their Fundamental Duties. No Justice to them even from apex court till date.

Every citizen of india must perform his / her Fundamental Duties without fail, before demanding his fundamental rights. Every
public servant must do their constitutional duties without fail.

A citizen performs fundamental duties without any rewards or pay or perks where as a government official / public servant does
his / her duties for huge pay & perks.

A citizen while performing his fundamental duties often has to spend his own money , time to fight legal cases , etc. Whereas a
public servant spends nothing during the course of his public duties, everything is borne by state exchequer.

A citizen while performing his fundamental duties faces rowdy elements , physical assaults in few instances even resulting in his
own murder. His family doesnt get even a penny compensation from exchequer. Whereas a public servant enjoys the full police
protection in the course of his duties and even if anything untoward happens his family will get compensation.

Obstructing a Citizen from performing his fundamental duties doesnt attract any legal prosecution whereas obstruction of public
servants constitutional duties is a crime under IPC.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are Fundamental Duties of Indian Citizens Supreme or the Illegal acts , orders by corrupt Government officials (Legalizing illegal
acts) Supreme ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt judges , police , public servants responsible for injustices , obstructions to
Fundamental Duties of citizens.

4. Averment:

Please read details at :

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

SHAME SHAME JUDGEs - Atrocities against DALITs by Judges

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-judges ,

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/shame-shame-judges

There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts.

- Mahatma Gandhi

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the cases mentioned at above web sites , to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website &
through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts
were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common
men & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has
not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the
present petition.
PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

1. To make obstruction of Fundamental Duties of an Indian Citizen a legally punishable offence on par with the obstruction of
a public servants duties.

2. To pay compensation of Rupees Two Crores and above to RTI Activists , Whistle Blowers , Journalists , ordinary citizens who
paid with their lives or suffered injuries in the course of their fundamental duties.

3. To order for inspection , investigation of each & every issue raised by a citizen in the course of his fundamental duties instead
of simply relying on government records alone prepared by corrupt officials.

4. To order all public servants including judges , Members of Parliament , Members of Legislative Assemblies , IAS officers , other
public servants to do their constitutional duties as well as their FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES properly.

5. To admit all the PILs sent by me to supreme court of india and to order the concerned public servants to give proper reply to all
RTI Appeals made by me.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 26.02.2017 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

DECLARATION

Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.

Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP

WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA

Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Clarion Of Dalit

Periodicity : WEEKLY

Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB

Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other
organizations / individuals .

Monetary Gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.

Owner/Editor/Printer/Publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.

Nationality : INDIAN

Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS
Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of
criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to
Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.

Home page :
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,

http://paper.li/f-1367938674 ,

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

Cell : 91 8970318202

Public Interest Litigation is an appeal for justice to the courts , to redress the injustices meted out to the public. Individual cases of
injustices pertaining to an individual are not covered under PIL, however an individual an activist who is fighting for public causes
suffering injustices as a result of his struggle ,caused by powers that be to silence him can club his individual case under the public
causes (PIL ) he is appealing.

Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india. In the
following web sites I have shown few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.

Traitors in Indian Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes by Khaki

https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki ,

Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even takes suo motto action.
Frequently crosses legal limits while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search , seizure without warrant , arrest
in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues no suo motto action ,
delayed action inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3 rd degree torture on him , no arrest ,
search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action where as cases
involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they dont consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make
far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly
called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation ,
job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of
injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for
questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies .
if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due
to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for
it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will
be effective.

Powers that be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases police dont have jurisdiction
over it. It sends a subtle message by police force to the complainant to keep silent . In the remaining cases which are under their
jurisdiction police dont act against higher ups , high & mighty. In such cases police lack practical powers , their hands are tied
although they are honest. As a end result , police have repeatedly called me to police station number of times ( have never called
guilty influential persons even once) took statement from me and closed the files. Hereby , I do make it clear the statements
made by me in my original petitions , PILs , news papers , etc while I was in a free & fair atmosphere are TRUE , over rides
, prevails over all the statements made by me before police earlier and which will be made by me in future before police.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for
ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India
together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay
Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries.
date : 29.03.2017..Your's sincerely,

place : India...Nagaraja.M.R.

Editorial : Cross Examination of Judges & Police

Honourable CJI , Union Home Secretary , Chief Justices , DG & IG of Police of all States , UTs FIRST Answer Questions

Our whole hearted respects to honest few working in judiciary , police & public service. Our comments are only directed
towards corrupt judges , corrupt police , corrupt public servants and the term JUDGE includes all public officials performing judicial ,
quasi judicial functions.

Judges , Police are NOT answering our following RTI Questions NOR admitting our PILs since years. Both of them are denying
information leading to crimes , covering up crimes. Thereby , both of them are aiding anti nationals , criminals. Who will prosecute
these guilty judges & police ?

Powers that be , cabinet ministers , judges are simply sending my petitions to police , to ensure closure of files. In most of the cases
police does not have the power nor jurisdiction and in the remaining cases they need written legal sanction from president of india
or governor or from their ministry head to legally prosecute high & mighty but legal sanctions are not given. Ultimate aim of
the judges , ministers , police is to close the file , to bury the TRUTH. They transfer the case to police , so that under the threat
of khaki power complainant becomes silent.

I have been summoned to police station tens of times without legal summons to give statements , by the way I have lost
money , daily wages , transportation cost. No compensation for that were paid to me. Rich , mighty criminals were not even
summoned once why ? Police question commoners for hours in some cases even apply 3rd degree TORTURE on common
people to get answers. Why police are NOT questioning rich , mighty criminals , criminals within the police force & judiciary ,
why NOT police are applying 3rd degree TORTURE on those CRIMINAL POLICE , JUDGEs to elicit truth in national interest.

In courts of justice , common people are subjected to rigorous questioning by prosecution , defense lawyers and judges. In the
same way when you judges & police themselves are in the dock , why can not you be questioned to elicit truth in national interest.
Are YOU Judges & Police special , exceptions , above LAW ?

My petitions have been transferred tens of times to police whether they have jurisdiction over it , whether they have legal
sanction to enquire it or NOT. All the files were closed by recording my statement without any enquiry of high , mighty criminals.
We need JUSTICE in all the cases , before summoning me to police station summon high , mighty criminals to police station
FIRST , before questioning me YOU Judges and Police ANSWER our questions FIRST , act on our PILs FIRST. We the
public want to know under whos behest you JUDGEs , POLICE are burying the truth , cases , files , our appeals.

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Yours ,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi.

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts.

- Mahatma Gandhi

RTI Appeals Not Answered by SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - Crimes Cover-up

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw.
They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of
Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the
below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is
not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law ,
Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.

Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis
they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty
judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to share infor mation ?

If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees
for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into
tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ
grave crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges &
Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?

The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With
respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by
covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle
class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs
that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their
constitutional duties properly.

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB
SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted
respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM
SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON
ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN
RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH
, INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW
INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ
DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,

RTI & Land Golmaal

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the
following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend
anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even
became judges through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from
public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.

Please give following information :

Main A :

1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of india. Salary disbursing officer will be
maintaining service records of all employees of supreme court of india including judges. These records are used for
disciplinary action , promotion , transfer of judges. If not within SCI , please give the address of the outside public
official who maintains service records of supreme court judges and kindly compile information from him and give it to
me orelse transfer my RTI application to him.

2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges with allegations against them and the
action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.

3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired high court judges with allegations against them and the action
taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.

4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired district & taluk court judges with allegations against them and
the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.

5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees than stipulated by law. Eventhough requisite
fees has been paid before transfer of RTI application to high courts. Please give me the details of action taken by
supreme court of india against erring high courts.

6. Give me the List of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi alias Nagaraja M R TO
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH POST , THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH website of DPG / DARPG. Action
taken or not taken with reasons thereof with respect to each petition.

7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india , to safe guard the HUMAN
RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of Nagaraja M R editor of SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for justice. He
repeatedly appealed to SCI highlighting violations of his human rights & fundamental rights. After appealing to SCI
only editor Nagaraja M R suffered more injustices , attempts on his life , etc , may be JUDGEs MAFIA is in deal with
outside MAFIA. Police are helpless & practically dont have power to question supreme court judges & other VVIPs.
Did SCI constitute SCI monitored enquiry committee with full legal authority to look into the issue.

8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give lectures , judgements running into hundreds of pages
eliciting legality, moral virtues , humanity , etc. But cover up information leading to crimes / accountability of judges.
The judges committee like a mafia deals it within without subjecting the accussed judge to public scrutiny & public
 trial. It is almost similar to a whore / bitch giving a lecture on virginity to women. To refresh your memory , Please
go through following websites to know about facts , actual cases of crimes by judges. Please give us information
regarding action taken or not taken with reasons there of with respect to each case mentioned in the following
websites:

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india to safeguard the human rights
of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .

10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by high courts of india to safeguard the human rights
of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .

11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court judges & district / taluk judges (both serving & retired)
who received favourable allotment of sites , etc which is nothing but a form of kick back for favours shown by judge.
Please give me the list of action taken or not taken by supreme court of india with reasons thereof in each case.

12. Please give me the list of action taken against by supreme court of india against CPIO & PIO of supreme court of
india , who repeatedly failed to give me information . thereby , CPIO & PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges ,
violating RTI Act & violating human rights / fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R together with public.

Main B :

1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women , irregularities , amassing disproportionate
wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal allotment of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?

2. what action taken casewise ?

3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same type of crimes ?

4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other honest judges ?

5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses / evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences ,
etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted by court for influencing , intimidating witnesses through
threats , 3rddegree torture , for concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths , fake encounters , illegal detention ,
3rd degree torture , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay compensation to innocent victims who were
wrongly charged , detained & tortured , murdered by police , since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why
?

9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement of lower court. In how many such cases ,
lower court judge is made to pay compensation to victims of their wrong judgement , since independence till date yearwise ?
what action ? if not why ?

10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial returns giving out their wealth , income details , yearwise
since independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?

11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?

12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to death by hanging , yearwise ?

13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?

14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents falsely charged
by police were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if not why ?

15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents wrongly
convicted by lower court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ?

16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA
DA bill while on tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ?

17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human & fundamental rights , threat to lives /
livelihood , etc were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since
1990 till date ? appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through DARPG , DPG. What
ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect to each appeal ?
18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out to public & public are still suffering
injustices. Crimes which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court.
What action against erring SC Judges ? if not why ?

19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend criminals within judiciary , police & public
service. What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ?

20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI judges I have suffered murder attempts on my
life , job losses , my newspaper closed , not getting press accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police ,
etc. what action against erring chief justice of india ? if not why ?

21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as amicus curie before supreme court of india &
jain commission of enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not permitted why ?

22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action taken ? if not why ?

23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not same for common people , Judges & Police ?
why ?

NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION , JUSTICE TO EDITOR
NAGARAJA M R LEADS TO THE THREAT TO THE LIFE , LIVLIHOOD OF HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE FAMILY. YOU ARE
LIABLE TO PAY COMPENSATION. DONT TRANSFER THIS CASE , APPLICATION TO POLICE THEY DONT HAVE POWER
TO ENQUIRE JUDGES LET ALONE TAKE ACTION. PLEASE ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED
SUPREME COURT MONITORED ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i
am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss
of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called
me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to
police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by
police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with
hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue officials ,
District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for it.
Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint
is & will be effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care
for ourselves , If anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my
dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue &
police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation
money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from
the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional
functionaries.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

RTI Appeals Not Answered by SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - Crimes Cover-up

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will
have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would
come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of
India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples
representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly
available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective
High Courts , etc.

Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis they
give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO
not asking that person to share infor mation ?

If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for
investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages
sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes
detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ?

The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect
to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges
& their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn
a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to
lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB
SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public servants in public service including judiciary. However,
the corrupt in public service dont deserve respect as individuals as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs
they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.

All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The
term JUDGEmentioned throught includes all public servants discharging judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial
officers to Chief Justice of India.

Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking
justice are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer
will be responsible for it.

Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India & other government authorities, in
apprehending criminals including corrupt judges & police. Herewith , we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India ,
to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go
scot- free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought
by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act ,
constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what
happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to committ more crimes. that is
exactly what is happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this
criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the
following questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.

The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to
protect & uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct
the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the
FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.

We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of
India & by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data
feed back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information
. so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time
limit , responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek
information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE
ARE ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to
register this appeal as a PIL petition & to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters raised in my RTI Application , in public
interest & equitable justice.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to
them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE
OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF
FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO
THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS
MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O
Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union
Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police.

Main A :

1. What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against women , casewise ? if not, why ?

2. What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not , why ?

3. I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place , from complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are
the judges & police , above law ?

4. I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But they were not registered , not honoured , why ?

5. To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme court of india & chief justice of india , till date I have
not received the reply , why ?

6. Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian citizens ?

7. Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of a complainant ?

8. By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding & abetting criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ?
9. While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a day , people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges
are getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking
judges ashamed ?

10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?

11. Why the supreme court of india didnt allow me to appear before it in the said case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?

12. Why the supreme court of india didnt protect my life , my job oppurtunities , my newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?

13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not
getting PRESS accreditation since 9 years , why ?

14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?

Main B :

You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not
replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.

Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of information , but amounts to violation of our fundamental &
human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts
of yours a crime in itself ?

If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding & abetting criminals , silencing a crusader is just & legal. The
same type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens will also be legal ?

Main C :

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions & to the honest few in public service. Contempt of
constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an
appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.

1. does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to
raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?

2. why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3. just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature & how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with
Ms.Jayalalita in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these constitute
contempt of the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ?

4. all the peoples representatives from panchayath member to president of India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide
along with.since independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating
policies against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?

5. is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?

6. how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?

7. are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how
many ?

8. what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?

9. who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?

10. the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in
prices of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up
by them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?

Main D :

1. we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of india , all state governments & supreme court of
india , in apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc.
whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of
India , are not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?

2. the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues /
cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?

3. why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ?

4. why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs
( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union & state home ministries ?

5. the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of India & national human rights
commission has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get
image ratings , TRPs ?

6. the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by their delaying tactics & denial of information , records.
What action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?
7. how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS
e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken
with respect to each complaint ?

8. the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following cases has resulted in more crimes , destruction /
manipulation of evidences , records and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against
criminals in following cases ?

SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA

http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,

ACCUSED Chief Justice of India

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of

CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF

INDIA -
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201

HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale

Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP pushpa kolasani on hunger strike in anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap

9. how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral & illegal acts , since independence till date ? what
action taken in each case ?

10. what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?

11. have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such judges of doubtful integrity & honesty ?

12. is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect the fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian
citizens ?

13. why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental rights & human rights of me & those
mentioned in my complaint ?

14. how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have disproportionate wealth ?

15. Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action
against erring public servants ?

16. why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me in
a consolidated form ?

Main E :

Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?

Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3 rd degree torture on prisoners ?

Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our motherland , its national security ?

Q4. Dont the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law & order ?

Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking
any action with respect to them ?

Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of
wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those
accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks.
Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences ,
witnesses. Why this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants dont give full , truthfull
information. Still , police / courts dont take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an amicus curie before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late
prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government
service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against
culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired
even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their familys wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While
appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-
check candidates background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to
national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front
running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are
starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of
Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits
have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those
murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded salwa judum to counter naxalites. Salwa judum
cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is
being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on
frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports
personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements & attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf
countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous
arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead
he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away
animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically
mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why this
differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every
nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at
consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all its products come with IMEI number only & stated
that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not theirs as it doesnt have
IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they dont have any business relationship with either tata indicom or its dealer. However the tata
indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesnt have IMEI numbers . this proves the
dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes ,
as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file B report , when after certain time limit no
leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be
closed with B report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv,
news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70
inmates without any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of
complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence
personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not
burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesnt cover the individual
actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement /
police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits over files for months. This gives
the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other peoples representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were
eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other peoples representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as
absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security
perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhis family
received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving its
partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove its case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay
riot case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against its partymen
were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to indias national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar
singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by
courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths ,
fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations ,
3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappans territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission
findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my fundamental duty hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt
public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family
members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on
the lines of defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS
REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face
the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from
munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior
judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judges family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for
making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed judges are not subjected to
tests like poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc , in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of Karnataka state government judicial
department house building co-operative society. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as
members of this society & allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said
societys judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for
a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the
parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol
pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3 rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court
which is handling that tortured persons case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for committing 3 rd degree torture , on charges of
attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my
merit ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesnt get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective
judge dealing that persons case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence
periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What
about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action
against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about
the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ?
remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions ,
etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &
women are their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payers expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost
resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at
government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals
in India , abroad , all at tax payers expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst
of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing amicus curie in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an amicus curie in late P.M Rajiv Gandhis assassination case ,
was not considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto
action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy
persons rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what
action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper
investigation intentionally to fail the case to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities ,
to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue
officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable
supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you the honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of indias on-line
grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 ,
DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 ,
DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 ,
DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 ,
DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 ,
DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money ,
untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for
books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official
work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are
protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemens family as being given to defense personnel , ex-
servicemen & their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank
loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his
confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police
failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option ,
to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &
other british colonies. After indias independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did
it continue with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ?
why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or its colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS
GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response
to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others
, in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home
secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my
present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &
prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution
witnesses , evidences & prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice ,
there being numerous such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the
government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the
cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?

Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of India?

a) Inside the House b) Outside the House

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like

a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India

c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC

e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.

Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?

a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.

b) Cover both their official & personal actions.

Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?

Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?

Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional
functionaries or equal or below ?

Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior
court and court of records ?

Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of
commons and House of Lords in England ?

Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by
raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by
peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in
importance to it ?

Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of
officials secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges

Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing
to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal
scrutiny. ?

Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payers money, they
get their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or
parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?

Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay,
perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or
a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?

Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament
acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?

Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the
legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?

Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?

Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation ? In some cases, the
Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.

Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?

Q164. Communication free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring
the Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of
all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges &
description of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme
court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a
short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are
those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious
dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the
previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his
senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However
most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at
the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does
the senses of drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue
judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?

Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against
union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully aided
the criminals Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country without courts permission ?

Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to
escape ?

Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be
tried ? what action has been taken against the CJI who became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?

Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to
Bhopal gas tragedy ?

Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution control board officials who have failed in their
duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?

Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the
criminal although they dont have right to do so ?

Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public
prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didnt press for the extradition of the criminal
Mr.Anderson , for producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?

Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & peoples representatives who became part of Operation
Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas
Leak Tragedy?

Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN
BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 dont the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or
just because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not booked by police? If the said police dont have legal jurisdiction to
book these VVIPs , they should have transferred the complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to book &
prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a
crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals for justice
concerning public welfare , national security sent through post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest
litigation , why ? does not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible
to protect the fundamental & human rights of people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the
fundamental & human rights of people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal
nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional police are together responsible , if anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District
Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station , mysore
will be responsible .

These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty In
whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites
ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:

CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS
OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA

cell : 91 8970318202

home page:

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,
http://paper.li/f-1367938674 ,

Follow me at
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184 ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,
http://twitter.com/naghrw ,

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw

A Member of Amnesty International