Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Synthetic FFR #1
Introduction
making soap from five thousand years ago.1 This chemical process is capable of hydrolyzing fats,
oils, and triglycerides into the fatty acid salts we use as soaps.1 The function of fatty acids salts as
a cleanser can be explained in its chemical structure as described by sodium myristate in Scheme
1. Since fatty acids salts contain a polar head and nonpolar hydrocarbon tail, in water the tails
will surround each other to reduce surface tension to decrease polar interactions forming a
micelle. In doing this the micelles also act an as cleanser surrounding unwanted exogenous
lipophilic material such as dirt and oils, so when the soap is washed off with water, so is the
unwanted material.2 However saponification has also been used heavily in industry as the
production of fatty acids can be derived from vegetable and animal oils and fats and also make
the valuable side product, glycerol. Glycerol is used in my biochemical reactions and has many
beneficial properties such as being used a sweetener making it in high demand.3 Also, besides
being precursors to soap, fatty acids can also be used as precursors to food, cosmetics, detergent,
will be extracted from nutmeg and then hydrolyzed by sodium hydroxide to the fatty acid salt,
strong base and heat must occur. The reaction mechanism for this synthesis can be seen below
on Scheme 1. In this experiment, the addition of Sodium Hydroxide creates OH- ions in the
ethanol/Trimyristin solution which can then in conjunction with heat initiate the reaction loop.
The OH- ions are able to attack any of the three symmetrical nucleophilic carbons that are double
bonded with oxygen. This forms a tetrahedral intermediate in the Trimyristin complex where the
oxygen that was originally part of the C=O double bond now has unpaired electrons. To stabilize
itself the oxygens lone pair of electrons will recreate the double bond and pushing the charge to
the closest oxygen to the center of the molecule. This process breaks the ester bond holding the
complex together creating a Trimyristin intermediate and one Myristic acid. Then, the oxygen
with unpaired electrons on Trimyristin intermediate will deprotonate the Myristic acid. The
counter cation Na+ will then ionically bond with the negatively charged oxygen on Myristic acid
to form the desired product, Sodium Myristate. The OH- ions can then continue the reaction loop
two more times for each nucleophilic carbon double bonded to an oxygen making effectively
saponification. This was done by first isolating Trimyristin from commercial ground nutmeg and
purified by recrystallization through ethanol. The purified Trimyristin was then saponified to
Sodium Myristate and also purified through recrystallization. The product was subject to
characterization by IR analysis.
Experimental
Trimyristin. Ground nutmeg (10g) and Diethyl ether (30 mL) were combined and refluxed for
30 minutes. Upon completion the excess ground nutmeg was removed by vacuum filtration and
washed with ether (2 x 20mL). The ether was evaporated to yield a light yellow crude product of
Trimyristin (3.44g, 4.757 mmol). The crude product was recrystallized 95% ethanol and vacuum
filtered to get the purified white solid product of Trimyristin (1.25g, 250% recovery). mp 55 C;
Sodium Myristate. 95% ethanol (4 mL), NaOH pellets (0.040g, 1 mmol), and Trimyristin (200
mg, 0.277 mmol) were combined and reluxed for 20 minutes. Upon completion, distilled water
(5 mL) and saturated NaCl (10 mL) was added to the solution and left to sit till a thick paste
product formed. The product was isolated through a vacuum filter and washed with cold water
(30 mL) to get the purified white solid of Sodium Myristate (0.6265g, 331.5% yield). IR (ATR)
Trimyristin. The addition of a strong base allowed for the nucleophilic attack on the carbon
doubled bonded to oxygen and ultimately the breakdown of the Trimyristin molecule into three
In the first part of this experiment, ground nutmeg was refluxed to isolate out Trimyristin.
From literature it is known that typically 5% of the mass used for nutmeg can be extracted as
Trimyristin. Using 10g of nutmeg, approximately 3.44g of crude Trimyristin was collected.
However, after a recrystallization using 95% ethanol was performed only 1.25g of dried
Trimyristin was isolated. This lead to the recrystallization percent yield being 36.3%. From
literature the recrystallization percent yield was around 24.3%1. The reason for the low
recrystallization percent yields is most likely due the difficulty in recrystallizing Trimyristin.
Since the melting point of Trimyristin is relatively low around 56-58 C, it was important to heat
the solution up slowly to dissolve the Trimyristin without oiling out the solid. The percent yield
using the purified sample of Trimyristin was 250%. This unrealistic percent yield was probably
caused by small amounts of solution still being inside the solid product. To prove that
Trimyristin was synthesized first a melting test was done on the sample. As mentioned earlier,
from literature it is known that the melting point range of Trimyristin is 56-58 C.1
Experimentally it was found to be 55 C which is very indicative of proving that Trimyristin was
synthesized. To further examine this product an IR analysis was ran of the sample product. The
IR spectrum can be seen in the Spectral Data (Figures 1 and 2, Supplemental Data). From the
data the most notable peaks of the IR spectrum occurred at 2912, 1731, and 1172 cm-1. The peak
at 2912 cm-1 represents the hydrocarbon bonds of the triglyceride tails. At 1731 cm-1 the peak
represents the three carbon oxygen double bonds that form the ester carbonyl groups. Finally,
the peak at 1127 cm-1 represent the carbon oxygen ester bond in Trimyristin. This data describes
Trimyristins molecular structure and was used for comparison to prove that Sodium Myristate
was made.
In the second part of the experiment, Saponification was done on Trimyristin under reflux
conditions to make Sodium Myristate. The overall yield after purification by vacuum filtration
and evaporation was 332%. It is reported that this experiment often leads to yields well over
100% even though theoretically it is impossible.1 The most logical explanation for this high yield
is that the product still has solvent such as water inside that was not able to evaporate out
increasing the weight significantly. To prove that Sodium Myristate was made and IR analysis
was taken of the sample. The IR spectrum can be seen in the Spectral Data (Figures 1 and 2,
Supplemental Data). The most notable peaks of the spectrum occurred at 3270, 2919, and 1742
cm-1. A very important peak in the spectrum at 3270 cm-1 is indicative of an oxygen hydrogen
bond. In Sodium Myristate alone there is no oxygen hydrogen bond as oxygen ionically attaches
to sodium. However, if water is present H+ of water could bond to the oxygen in place of sodium
producing this spectra peak. This would also help prove that solvent is still present inside the
sodium myristate sample. If solvent wasnt present, then no peak would have appeared.
However, this only holds true if the sample is Sodium Myristate as additional solvent inside a
sample of Trimyristin would not produce an oxygen hydrogen bond. Another peak occurs at
2919 cm-1 which similarly to Trimyristin refers to the hydrogen carbon bonds in the tail region of
Sodium Myristate. Lastly, the peak at 1742 cm-1 refers to the carbon oxygen double bond of the
carboxylic acid group. This peak is also indicative that the product synthesized is sodium
myristate. Since this carbon oxygen double bond is part of a carboxylic acid group it is a little
higher in wavenumber than an ester carbon oxygen double bond like the one present in
Trimyristin. Another notable difference is that there is no peak around 1100 cm-1 for Sodium
Myristate like there were was in Trimyristin. This peak was also representative of a carbon
oxygen ester bond which is only present in Trimyristin. The lack of this peak further indicates
that this product was not contaminated in any significant amount and that Sodium Myristate was
synthesized.
After analysis, a few tests were done of the sample of Sodium Myristate. The sample
was dissolved in water and separated into two different test tubes where olive oil and 1% FeCl3
were added separately. The addition of olive oil to the Sodium Myristate solution caused the oil
to mix with the solution. Since oil is essentially a lipid it should be able to form a mixture with
the Sodium Myristate solution which also contains lipid like features with the hydrocarbon tail.
Upon the addition of 1% FeCl3 the solution had a grey precipitate form. This was most likely
formed from the Fe3+ ion replacing the Na+ ion that is usually associated with Sodium Myristate
creating an insoluble solid in the test tube. This test is another proof that Sodium Myristate was
synthesized as Trimyristin would have no reactions involved with 1% FeCl3 that would result in
a precipitate.
The saponification of triglycerides, fats, and oils are a very focused area in organic
chemistry and industry as it is can be the basis for many products used in everyday life. The
overall saponification of Trimyristin to Sodium Myristate was successful having a percent yield
of 332%. As discussed earlier the unrealistic yield is usually over 100% due to solvent such as
water being trapped inside the product which was proven with the IR spectrum of Sodium
Myristate. In the future, better results for percent yield of the product could be taken if more
time was allowed for the products to dry between experiments. It is also possible that the
recrystallization could have had better yield if possibly a better solvent was used. Although
ethanol was a good solvent it may have still been too different in polarity to Myristate and cause
a less then optimal recrystallization compared to another solvent. Overall the products were
synthesized in explainable yields and produced data that supported their structures.
References
1
Mattos, M. C. S. D.; Nicodem, D. E. Soap From Nutmeg: An Integrated Introductory Organic
Chemistry Laboratory Experiment. J. Chem. Educ. Journal of Chemical Education. 2002, 79,
9496.
2
Walters, R. M.; Mao, G.; Gunn, E. T.; Hornby, S. Cleansing Formulations That Respect Skin
4
Jumat Salimon, Bashar Mudhaffar Abdullah, and Nadia Salih, Saponification of Jatropha