PROGRESS Structural Design Tender Packages

Legend of colors NAVAIDs
Not started To be delivered on (to GACM): 15-02-17

On going (10%)
On going (40%) Status at day: 14-02-2017
Finished
It does not apply
Progress
AGL & NAVAIDs
Results Analisys Structural engineers Geotechnical engineers
engineers
Settlements [cm] NL Mxico (TASANA) NL
No. of Part of Min tezontle
Ground Max.
structures Element NAVAIDs Dimensions [m] Type of foundation below foundation Long term (20 Short term Coordinators:
improvement Settlement Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
(types) package? [m] years) (vehicle load) Peter Vorage
allowable .
Surface Movement Radar (SMR) and Primary & secondary Improved / 169 Friction piles 0.30 Data provided Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing
1 Yes 19.50 x 19.50 x 5.50 0.3 approx 7 cm - 10 Pre-design Quantifications
surveillance Radar (PSR/SSR) Unimproved x 15 m (12-01-17) solution model memo drawings capacity
Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing
1 Wind Direction Indicator (WDI) Yes 3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 4.98 - 10 Quantifications
(12-01-17) (Erick) solution model (Erick) memo drawings capacity
Horizontal Horizontal
Data provided Structural Seismic loads Vertical Horizontal Material
1 Foundation around wind cone Yes - Unimproved Shallow - - - 10 Quantifications pressures due to pressures due
(12-01-17) drawings at ground springs springs weight
ground to vehicle
1 Equipment shelter Yes 6.00 x 4.00 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 8.61 - 10 Quantifications
1 Automated weather observing system (AWOS) Yes 3.50 x 3.50 x 0.30 Improved Shallow 0.3 9.95 - 10 Quantifications
9 Friction piles Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing
1 Instrument Landing System - Glide path antenna (ILS) Yes 6.00 x 5.00 x 0.30 Improved 0.3 0.46 - 3 Quantifications
0.50 x 15 m (12-01-17) (Erick) solution model (Erick) memo drawings capacity
1 Instrument Landing System - Localizer (ILS) Yes 46.0 x 4.24 x 0.30 Improved 0.3 0.52 - 3 Quantifications

1 Thunderstorm detection - Foundation type 1 Yes 1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 5.48 - 10 Quantifications
Horizontal Horizontal Horizontal

Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing Vertical Horizontal Material
1 Runway Visual Range (RVR) - Foundation type 1 Yes 1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 Improved Shallow 0.3 8.65 - 10 Quantifications pressures due to pressures due pressures due
(12-01-17) (Erick) solution model (Erick) memo drawings capacity springs springs weight
ground to vehicle to vehicle

1 Ceilometer - Foundation type 1 Yes 1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 7.36 - 10 Quantifications

1 Near Field Monitor - for Localizer (NFM) - Foundation type 1 Yes 1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 4.8 - 10 Quantifications

1 Near Field Monitor - for Glide path antenna (NFM) Yes 1.60 x 1.60 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 9.85 - 10 Quantifications

1 Far Field Monitor (FFM) - Foundation type 1 No 1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 Unimproved Shallow 0.3 - 10 Quantifications
1 Low level Windshare alert system (LLWAS) Yes 3.00 x 3.00 x 0.35 Unimproved 1 0.77 - 10 Quantifications
Horizontal Horizontal Horizontal
Vertical Horizontal Material
Ground Based Augmentation System - Reference receiver (GBAS) 5 Friction piles Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing pressures due to pressures due pressures due
1 Yes 3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 Improved 0.5 0.4 - 10 Quantifications springs springs weight
0.50 x 10 m (12-01-17) (Erick) solution model (Erick) memo drawings capacity ground to vehicle to vehicle
1 Ground Based Augmentation System - VDB antenna (GBAS) No 3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 0.3 0.45 - 10 Quantifications
1 Doppler VHF Omnidirectional (DVOR) No Unimproved 0.5 - 10 Quantifications
17 TOTAL No. Type of structures
Note: Official translations into Spanish

Legend of colors
Not started
On going (10%)
On going (40%)
Finished
Data
Element
Number of
Dimensions [m]
structures
1.00 x 2.50 x 0.20
3 Signage and stop signs 1.00 x 4.00 x 0.20
1.00 x 5.50 x 0.20
3 lights: 3.30 x 1.00 x

0.30
3 Approach light - low lights 5 lights: 6.00 x 1.00 x 0.30
8 Lights: 10.05 x 1.00 x

0.30
1 approach light - with mast 3.50 x 3.50 x 0.85
1 PAPI 2.00 x 2.00 x 0.30

Data Results analysis
Settlements
Min. Tezontle below
Ground improvement Drawing No. Type of foundation
foundation [m] Long term settlements
[cm]
Preload and no-preload Shallow 0.30 14.79

Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 520
Preload and no-preload Shallow 0.30 14.71

Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 521
Preload and no-preload Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 522 Shallow 0.30 14.56
Preload and no-preload Shallow 0.50

15.83
Preload and no-preload Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 524 Shallow 0.50
15.83
15.83
Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 525 15.32
Preload Shallow 0.30
Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 523 3.17
AGL
To be delivered on (to GACM): 15-02-17
Status at day: 08-02-17
ts analysis Electrical engineers Structural engineers
Settlements NL Mxico
Short term settlements Max. Settlement Coordinator: Martin

Coordinator: Vctor Daz
[cm] allowable [cm] Havenaar
Structural-geotechnical
Pre-design (RWYs 2 Mathematical model
- 15 Standarization solution
& 3)
& 3)
& 3)
& 3)
& 3)
& 3)
& 3)
- 3 Standarization Pre-design Mathematical model
solution
Structural engineers Geotechnical engineers
Mxico NL
Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs

Structural Drawings Quantities
(RWYs 2 & 3) 2 & 3)

(RWYs 2 & 3) 2 & 3)

(RWYs 2 & 3) 2 & 3)
Horizontal
(RWYs 2 & 3)
2 & 3) pressures due
to vehicle Vertical
Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs springs
(RWYs 2 & 3) 2 & 3)

(RWYs 2 & 3) 2 & 3)

(RWYs 2 & 3) 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs
Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
& 3) 2 & 3)
(RWYs 2 & 3)
cal engineers
NL
uud Steenbakkers
Horizontal Material
springs weight
Legend of colors according to status
Not started
In progress (10%) To be delivered on: 8th May
In progress (40%)
Finished Status at day: 09 - 05-2016

Critical elements due to current status
Data not needed from this team
Legend of colors RWY 6
Not started
To be delivered on (to GACM): 31-03-17
On going (10%)

Finished
Progress
Results Analisys Drainage engineers Electrical engineers Structural engineers Geotechnical engineers
Elements Settlements [cm] NL Mxico NL Mxico NL

Number of Type of Min tezontle below
structures Ground improvement Max. settlements
Dimensions [m] Depth [m] foundation foundation [m] Long term (20 years) Short term (vehicle load)
Depth for Load bearing
Quantity
Coordinator: Wolter Coordinator: Carlos Coordinator: Martin
Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
allowed [cm] capacity calculation Tijssen Daz Havenaar
Geotechnical
3; Pre-design (22- Structural-geotechnical solution Load bearing capacity (24-12-
Preload, No-preload Shallow 8.85 5.84 10 2.75 1 Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural Drawings Quantities solution
3.25 (depth + foundation) 12-2016) (02-01-17) 2016)
1.2 x 1.2 m (inner); (02-01-17)
1.6 x 1.6 m (outer) Geotechnical
4.5; Pre-design (22- Structural-geotechnical solution Load bearing capacity (24-12-
(02-01-17)
Geotechnical
Preload, No-preload Shallow 7.54 4.05 10 1.85 Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural Drawings Quantities solution
(02-01-17)
89
Geotechnical
Preload, No-preload Shallow 8.70 3.87 10 2.31 Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural Drawings Quantities solution
(02-01-17)
8 Standard pits Data provided Standarization
Geotechnical
2.25 x 2.25 m (inner); 2.85 x 2.85 m (outer) Preload, No-preload Shallow 9.13 3.90 10 3.56 162 Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural Drawings Quantities solution
(02-01-17)
Geotechnical Vehicle loads
5.5; Pre-design (22- Structural-geotechnical solution Load bearing capacity (24-12- Volumetric weight of Horizontal earth Seismic earth Modulus of subgrade reaction Upwards water
Preload, No-preload Shallow 8.91 3.88 10 5.06 2 Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural Drawings Quantities solution (horizontal and Freatic level depth Allowable
Drainage 5.8 (depth + foundation) 12-2016) (02-01-17) 2016) materials pressures pressures (vertical and horizontal) pressure (formula
(02-01-17) vertical) settlements
(19-12-17) (19-12-17) (19-12-17) (19-12-17) at geo-note)
(19-12-17)
Geotechnical
(02-01-17)
Geotechnical
2.7 x 2.7 m (inner); 3.30 x 3.30 m (outer) Preload, No-preload Shallow 7.90 2.97 10 3.1 41 Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural Drawings Quantities solution
(02-01-17)
Collection pit 610 mm (for Geotechnical

Standarization (06- Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs
reinforced and PEAD pipe) - 1.9 x 1.7 (outer) 2.60 (below foundation) Preload, No-preload Shallow 10 Data provided
04-2016)
Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings
& 3) 2 & 3)
solution
between RWY's and apron scope (RWYs 2 & 3)
1
Geotechnical
Collection pit - 760 mm (for Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs
1.50 x 1.50 (inner); 2.0 x 2.0 (outer) 2.60 (below foundation) Preload, No-preload Shallow 10 Data provided Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
prestressed pipe) & 3) 2 & 3)
(RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
Slotted drain class 2 2.0 x 6.0 (outer) 1.00 Preload Shallow 10 Data provided Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
1 20.76 12.45 & 3) 2 & 3)
(RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical Volumetric weight of Modulus of subgrade reaction Freatic level depth

Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs materials (vertical and horizontal) (RWYs 2 & 3)
1.00 x 0.5 x 0.2 0.20 Preload Shallow 3 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
& 3) 2 & 3) (RWYs 2 & 3) (RWYs 2 & 3)
Elevated lights (RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
Earthing pit Preload, No-preload Shallow 10 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
& 3) 2 & 3)
(RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
0.745 (inner); 0.895 Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs
AGL Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings
& 3) 2 & 3)
solution
(below foundation) (RWYs 2 & 3)
Preload
Geotechnical
0.75 x 0.75 m (inner); 0.905 (inner); 1.055 Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs
AGL/NAVAIDs pits Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings
& 3) 2 & 3)
solution
1.05x1.05 m (outer) (below foundation) (RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
No-preload (foundation 1.85 x 0.905 (inner); 1.055 Quantities (RWYs 2 Load bearing capacity (RWYs
No preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings
& 3) 2 & 3)
solution
1.85 m) (below foundation) (RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
Communications Shallow 5 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
& 3) 2 & 3)
Pit (CM) 2x 110 9.942 8.908 (RWYs 2 & 3)
Geotechnical
Fence Fence foundation No-preload Shallow Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Calculations memo Structural drawings solution
& 3) 2 & 3)
(RWYs 2 & 3)
Leveling of pits due to difference of settlements between construction of pit and pavement Look for a solution Structural drawings
- - - - -
package (Mijail) (06-05-2016) (06-05-2016)
Pipe-pit conexions - - - - - Look for a solution Look for a solution
Look for a solution

Pipe-pipe conexions due to difference of settelments - - - - - Look for a solution
(Erick) (06-05-2016)
Look for a solution

Structural drawings
Slotted drain-slotted drain conexion - - - - - Look for a solution (Cesia) (06-05-
(06-05-2016)
2016)
Data provided (60%
design delivery ) Look for a solution
- Details - Drainage Structural drawings
Slotted drain-collection pit conexion - - - - - Look for a solution (Cesia) (06-05-
(06-05-2016)
2016)
Look for a solution Structural drawings

Asphalt - - - - -
(Mijail) (06-05-2016) (06-05-2016)
Top of pit-pavement conexion
Look for a solution Structural drawings
Unpavement - - - - -
(Mijail) (06-05-2016) (06-05-2016)
Look for a solution

Structural drawings
Cover for overflow pit - - - - - (Cesia) (06-05-
(06-05-2016)
2016)
Shaft type 1 and 2

Legend of colors Commercial Apron (terminal)
On going (10%)
Finished
Progress
AGL & NAVAIDs

Drainage engineers Structural engineers Geotechnical engineers
engineers
Elements Settlements (cm) NL NL Mxico Mxico (TASANA) NL
No. of
structures Coordinators:
Long term (SACMAG Short term (SACMAG Max. settlement Coordinator: Wolter Coordinator:
(types) Element Dimensions [m] Depth [m] Ground improvement Peter Vorage / Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
Calculations) Calculations) allowable [cm] (NACO) Tijssen Carlos Daz
Deerns
5.00 to 5.70 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity 05-07-
Tipo 3 y 8. Cuerpo A 6.15 x 3.60 (outer) Vacuum, Preload 0.96 10 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
foundation) 13.386 (100% design) model 2016
Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity 05-07-
Tipo 3 y 8. Cuerpo B 3.50 x 3.50 (outer) 2.30 (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload 2.002 10 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
26.305 (100% design) model 2016
Data provided Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical Load bearing capacity

Tipo 3 y 8. Cuerpo C 3.80 x (10.00 to 11.90) (outer) 3.80 max. (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload 3.298 - 10 Standarization Pre-design Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
(100% design) 06-07-2016) model (Carlos- depth)
Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity 05-07-
Tipo 3 y 8. Cuerpo D 6.15 x 3.60 (outer) 3.50 + h' (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload 0.96 10 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
13.386 (100% design) model 2016
8 Oil Water separator (OWS)
Data provided Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical Load bearing capacity 06-07-
Tipo 2. Cuerpo A 8.60 x 3.60 (outer) 5.70 (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload 9.024 1.07 10 Standarization Pre-design Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
(100% design) 06-07-2016) model 2016
5.00 to 5.70 (below Data provided Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical Load bearing capacity 06-07-
Tipo 2. Cuerpo B 5.90 x 3.50 (outer) Vacuum, Preload 1.496 10 Standarization Pre-design Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
foundation) 10.102 (100% design) 06-07-2016) model 2016
Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity
Tipo 2. Cuerpo C 6.0 x 12.0 3.80 max. (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload 3.3 - 10 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
(100% design) model (Carlos- depth)
Data provided Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical Load bearing capacity 06-07-

Tipo 2. Cuerpo D 8.60 x 3.60 (outer) 5.70 (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload 9.024 1.07 10 Standarization Pre-design Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
(100% design) 06-07-2016) model 2016
610 mm (for reinforced

Data provided Standarization (06- Mathematical Load bearing capacity (12-
1 and PEAD pipe) - between 1.9 x 1.7 (outer) 2.60 (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload, Transiction 10 Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
(100% design) 04-2016) model 04-2016)
RWY's and apron scope
Collection pit
760 mm (for prestressed 1.50 x 1.50 (inner); 2.0 x 2.0 Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity 06-07-
1 2.60 (below foundation) Vacuum, Preload, Transition 3 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
pipe) (outer) (100% design) model 2016
2.75 to 3.25 (below Data provided Mathematical

Vacuum, Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
1.20 x 1.20 (inner) + 0.25 foundation) 25.909 7.539 3 (100% design) model Load bearing capacity 05-07-
wall thickness 3.25 to 4.25 (below Data provided Mathematical 2016
foundation) 19.483 5.839 3 (100% design) model
2.8 to 3.55 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity 05-07-
5 Fire stop (without wall) 2.25 x 2.25 (inner) + 0.30 foundation) 16.458 4.862 3 (100% design) model 2016
wall thickness 3.55 to 4.30 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity 05-07-
Drainage Vacuum, Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
foundation) 16.458 4.862 3 (100% design) model 2016
2.7 x 2.7 (inner) + 0.30 wall 3.30 to 4.60 (below Data provided Mathematical
Vacuum, Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
thickness= foundation) (100% design) model
25.886 4.18 3
Data provided Mathematical
2.8 to 3.55 Vacuum, Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
16.458 4.862 3 (100% design) model
2.25 x 2.25
Apron pits Data provided Mathematical
3 Fire stop (with wall) 3.55 to 4.00 Vacuum, Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
10.458 4.862 3 (100% design) model
2.7 x 2.7 3.30 to 4.60 Vacuum, Preload Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
25.886 4.18 3 (100% design) model
Cortafuego tipo 1 (con

hueco) - Box connecting 0.60 x 0.60 (inner) + 0.15 1.00 + 0.15 (foundation Data provided Mathematical
1 Vacuum Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
slotted drain type X with wall thickness thickness) (100% design) model
apron pit
3
Cortafuego tipo 2 (con

hueco) - Box connecting 0.60 x 0.60 (inner) + 0.15 1.00 + 0.15 (foundation Data provided Mathematical
1 Vacuum Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
slotted drain type Y with wall thickness thickness) (100% design) model
apron pit
3
250 mm; Data provided Mathematical
1 Slotted drain class 1 Cul de sac, full pavement max. 1 m Transition, Preload 3 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
width 900 mm (100% design) model
Border of packages of RWYs 300 mm; Data provided Mathematical

Slotted drain class 2 max. 1 m Preload 10 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
and Apron width max. 600 mm 20.759 12.445 (100% design) model
Horizontal pressures due Horizontal pressures due Review of Seismic calculations given Weigth of
Vertical springs - Horizontal springs
to ground to vehicles on 100%design material
Inner bay terminal/ Satellite, 300 mm; Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity
1 Slotted drain class 3 & 4 max. 1 m Vacuum, Preload 3 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
Full pavement width 900 mm (100% design) model (Packages 2 & 3)
Cul de sac/Around Terminal, 400 mm; Data provided Mathematical

1 Slotted drain class 5 and 6 max. 1 m Transition, Vacuum, Preload 3 Standarization Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
fFll pavement width 900 mm (100% design) model
Mathematical
Data provided Pre-design (RWY's 2 Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications (RWY's
1 AGL edge light (elevated lights) 3 model (RWY's 2 & Load bearing capacity
(100% design) & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) 2 & 3)
3)

1 Floodlighting / Low level Windshare Alert System Preload 3 Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
(100% design) model
Mathematical
Data provided Pre-design (RWY's 2 Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications (RWY's
1 AGL Earthing pit (for AGL, NAVAIDs and floodlight) 3
(100% design) & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3)
model (RWY's 2 &
(RWY's 2 & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) 2 & 3)
Load bearing capacity
3)
Mathematical
Pre-design (RWY's 2 Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications (RWY's
1 "Meeting point" signs To be defined To be defined Transition 3 Data provided model (RWY's 2 & Load bearing capacity
& 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) (RWY's 2 & 3) 2 & 3)
3)
Mathematical
1 Visual Docking Guidance System (VDGS) Transition, Preload, Vacuum 3 Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
model
1.9 (inner); 2.20 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity (01-
PA1 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
foundation) 8.143 2.533 10 (02-2016) model 09-2016)
3.00 x 2.1 (inner); 3.60x2.70 2.1 (inner); 2.40 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity (01-
PA4 (outer) Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
PA7 2.3 (inner); 2.60 (outer) Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
8.143 2.533 10 (02-2016) model
1.9 (inner); 2.20 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity (02-
PA2 Transition (no preload) Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
2.1 x 2.1 (inner); 2.7x2.7 2.1 (inner); 2.40 (below Data provided Mathematical Load bearing capacity (02-
PA5 (outer) Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
2.3 (inner); 2.60 (below Data provided Mathematical
PA8 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
foundation) 8.143 2.533 10 (02-2016) model
PB1 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
2.1 x 2.4 (inner); 3.00x2.7 foundation) 8.143 10 (02-2016) model
(outer) 2.1 (inner); 2.40 (below Data provided Mathematical
PB4 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
foundation) 10 (02-2016) model
16 Low voltage (LV) 150 & 110 mm PB2 foundation)
Vacuum, Preload
8.143 10 (02-2016)
Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution
model
Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
2.1 x 1.5 (inner); 2.7x2.1 1.9 (inner); 2.20 (below Data provided Mathematical
(outer) foundation) 8.143 10 (02-2016) model
foundation) 10 (02-2016) model
Pits - Apron
systems & AGL 2.4 x 1.7 (inner); 3.00x2.3 1.7 (inner);2.00 (below Data provided Mathematical
PC1 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
(outer) foundation) 8.143 2.533 10 (02-2016) model
1.5 x 1.7 (inner); 2.1x2.3 1.7 (inner);2.00 (below Data provided Mathematical
PC2 y PC3 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
0.7x1.4 (inner); 1.20x1.90 1 (inner); 1.25 (below Data provided Mathematical
PD1 y PD2 y PD3 Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
0.75x0.75 (inner); 1.05x1.05 1 (inner);1.15 (below Data provided Mathematical
PK Transition (no preload) Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
Data provided (17- Mathematical
M1 1.4 x 1.6 (inner) 1.80 (inner) Vacuum, Preload To be defined To be defined Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
3 01-17) model
M2 2.0 x 1.6 (inner) 1.80 (inner) Vacuum, Preload To be defined To be defined Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
3 01-17) model
C1 1.00 x 1.40 (inner) 1.50 (inner) Vacuum, Preload To be defined To be defined Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
3 02-17) model
0.7x1.4 (inner); 1.20x1.90 1 (inner); 1.25 (below Mathematical
1 Power socket Vacuum, Preload Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
(outer) foundation) 3 model
0.75 x 0.75 (inner); 1.05x1.05 1.00 (inner); 1.20 (below Data provided Mathematical
1 COM (CM) 2110mm Vacuum, Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
(outer) foundation) 9.942 8.908 3 (100% design) model
Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
foundation) (100% design) model
Preload
0.75 x 0.75 m (inner); 0.905 (inner); 1.055 (below Data provided Mathematical
3 AGL/NAVAIDs pits Preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
1.05x1.05 m (outer) foundation) (100% design) model
No-preload (foundation 1.85 0.905 (inner); 1.055 (below Data provided Mathematical
No preload Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
x 1.85 m) foundation) (100% design) model
Leveling of pits due to difference of settlements between Look for a solution (Mijail) Structural drawings (06-
- - - - -
construction of pit and pavement package (06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Pipe-pit conexions - - - - - Look for a solution Look for a solution
Look for a solution (Erick)

Pipe-pipe conexions due to difference of settelments - - - - - Look for a solution
(06-05-2016)
Look for a solution Structural drawings (06-

Slotted drain-slotted drain conexion - - - - - Look for a solution
(Cesia) (06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Data provided (60% design
Details - delivery )
Drainage
Slotted drain-collection pit conexion - - - - - Look for a solution
(Cesia) (06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Look for a solution (Mijail) Structural drawings (06-

Asphalt - - - - -
(06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Top of pit-pavement conexion Concrete
(06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Unpavement - - - - -
(06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Cover for overflow pit - - - - -
(Cesia) (06-05-2016) 05-2016)
Shaft type 1 and 2
Structural-
Data provided (20-01-2017) Calculations Structural Horizontal pressures due to Horizontal pressures due
To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined Pre-design geotechnical Mathematical model Quantifications Load bearing capacity Seismic loads at ground Vertical springs Horizontal springs Material weight
Anchorage Aircraft static earthing point Preload memo drawings ground to vehicle
solution
Quantities system pits:

Legend of colors Cargo, Maintenance and Remote Aprons
On going (10%)
On going (40%) Status at day:
Finished
Progress
AGL & NAVAIDs
Drainage engineers Structural engineers Geotechnical engineers
engineers
Elements Settlements (cm) NL NL Mxico Mxico (TASANA) NL
No. of
structures Coordinators:
Ground Coordinator: Coordinator:
(types) Element Dimensions [m] Depth [m] Long term Short term Peter Vorage / Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
improvement Wolter Tijssen Carlos Daz
Deerns
- Same structurs as per Commercial apron (terminal)

To be Data provided (20- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing Horizontal pressures due Horizontal pressures due to Seismic loads at Vertical Horizontal Material
To be defined To be defined To be defined Pre-design Quantifications
1 Anchorage Aircraft static earthing point defined Preload 01-2017) solution model memo drawings capacity to ground vehicle ground springs springs weight
Data provided Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing Horizontal pressures due Horizontal pressures due to Seismic loads at Vertical Horizontal Material
Drainage To be defined Standarization Pre-design Quantifications
? solution model memo drawings capacity to ground vehicle ground springs springs weight
Signage for 'meeting point'

Not started
In progress (10%) To be delivered on: 8th May
In progress (40%)
In progress (80%)
Finished
Critical elements due to current status
Data not needed from this team
Progress
Drainage engineers Electrical engineers Telecom engineers Structural engineers Geotechnical engineers Data
To-do-list
Elements
NL Mxico
Mexico Mxico Mxico
NL Mxico Drawings
Load of design Min. Tezontle
Number of Pipe diameter Kind of
(Given by under
structures Coordinator: Wolter Coordinator: Hctor Coordinator: Jara Coordinator: Hctor (mm) foundation
Dimensions [m] Depth [m] Coordinator: Carlos Daz Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinaror: Ruud Steenbakkers Concepto No. Drawing No. SACMAG-NACO) foundation [m]
Tijssen Lpez Sanchez Valverde
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Mijail) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Rafael) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04-
3; 3.25 (depth + foundation)
1.2 x 1.2 (inner); 1.7 x 1.7 2016) solution 21-04-2016 21-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) 610 (external
Tow tractor
(external) Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Miajil) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Rafael) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- size)
4.5; 4.75 (depth + foundation)
2016) solution 20-04-2016 20-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Mijail) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Miguel) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04-
2016) solution 25-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
2.25 x 2.25 (inner); 2.85 x 2.85 Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Erick) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Miguel) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- 910 (external o First Wolter to provide new update with overview pit
(external) 2016) solution 20-04-2016 20-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) size) sizes (width, length and depth) after finalizing drainage
Pre-design (25-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Juan Calculations memo (06-05- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity 26-04- lay-out
5.5; 5.80 (depth + foundation) Structural Drawings (06-05-2016) o Adjust details of pit shafts (now outer dimension is
2016) solution 27-04-2016 Luis) 27-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 2016
1.2m instead of inner)
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Mijail) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Miguel) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- o Critical look to current standardisation
2016) solution 21-04-2016 25-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) o Structural calculations, discussion about the split of
big pits. Determine the pipe distances and connection in
2.7 x 2.7 (inner); 3.3 x 3.3 Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Erick) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Miguel) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- 1070 (external between in the pits
Standard pits - 5.3; 5.60 (depth + foundation) Data provided (25- Standarization (29-03-2016) . Standarize again the pits with incoming invert
14 (external) 2016) solution 20-04-2016 20-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) 16 size)
Drainage 03-2016) level difference
Pre-design (25-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Juan Calculations memo (06-05- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity 26-04- BH 92 TPL XXXXX 001 to 006. Details on BH 92
6; 6.30 (depth + foundation) Structural Drawings (06-05-2016)
2016) solution 27-04-2016 Luis) 27-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 2016 TPL XXXXX 028 and 029 Aircraft
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Juan Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Celeste) Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04-
3.8; 4.15 (depth + foundation) Limit of long term
2016) solution Luis) 27-04-2016 2016) (06-05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
5.0 x 2.7 (inner); 5.6 x 3.3 settlements - 1520 (external
(external) 2nd Review of Seismic Vertical springs - size)
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Juan Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Celeste) Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- Horizontal pressures Freatic level at (Confirmed to
5.3; 5.60 (depth + foundation) Horizontal pressures due to calculations given on Aircraft braking preloaded and not Horizontal springs Weigth of material
2016) solution (20-04-2016) Luis) (20-04-2016) 2016) (06-05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) due to ground (07-04- different areas of structural team,
vehicles (06-04-2016) 100%design (19.04- (06-04-2016) preloaded areas (11-04-2016) (05-04-2016)
2016) airport (06-04-2016) Pending on writting
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Erick) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Rafael) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- 2016) (07-04-2016)
3.8; 4.15 (depth + foundation) it down) 22 -04-
2016) solution 21-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) 2016 2x1520 and
1x1520 (external
Pre-design (04-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Erick) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Rafael) (06- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (07-04- size)
7.5 x 2.7 (inner); 8.1 x 3.3 5.3; 5.60 (depth + foundation)
2016) solution (18-04-2016) 2016) 05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
(external)
3x1520 and
Pre-design (25-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Erick) Calculations memo (06-05- Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity 26-04-
6.2; 6.50 (depth + foundation) Structural Drawings (06-05-2016) 1x1520 (external
2016) solution 27-04-2016 27-04-2016 2016) 05-2016) 2016
size)
o Number of/or distance expansion joints

Collection pits- Data provided (100% Standarization (06-04- Pre-design (13-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Cesia) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Celeste) Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (12-04-
1.4 x 1.2 (inner) 2.3 + slab 16 Aircraft o Drain sections lengths
Drainage design) 2016) 2016) solution 18-04-2016 2016) (06-05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
1 o
Slotted drain type 2 - Data provided (100% Standarization (for Pre-design (7-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Cesia) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Celeste) Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (18-04- BH 92 TPL XXXXX 027. Location on BH 92 TPL o First Wolter to provide an overview/proposal to
2.0 x 6.0 (external size) 1 16 Aircraft
Drainage design) packages 2&3) 2016) solution (20-04-2016) 21-04-2016 2016) (06-05-2016) 05-2016) 2016) XXXXX 001 to 006 standardize these pits.
1
3.9 x 2.85 (external Data provided Standarization (13-04- Pre-design (13-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Cesia) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Celeste) Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (13-04-
3.1
dimensions) (1-04 & 05-04) 2016) 2016) solution (20-04-2016) 21-04-2016 2016) (06-05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
Overflow pits -
2 CF&R truck
Drainage
o Structural calculations to determine materials +
4.85 x 2.85 (external Data provided Standarization (13-04- Pre-design (13-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model (Cesia) Calculations memo (06-05- Structural Drawings (Celeste) Quantifications (06- Load bearing capacity (13-04-
3.1 16 BH 92 TPL XXXXX 018 y 019 reference to different strength classes (100% design
dimensions) (1-04 & 05-04) 2016) 2016) solution (21-04-2016) 25-04-2016 2016) (06-05-2016) 05-2016) 2016)
contains already division in different locations)
Mathematical model - Material and loads for pipes

Pipe strength - Data provided (100% Standarization (04-05- Update Specification (09-05- Beding calculation 29-
- Shown on drawings Detail Drawings Pressures given to the Calculation memo strength calculation (18-04- 16 BH 92 000 XXXXX 004 y 005 On drawing
Drainage design) 2016) 2016) 04-2016
ground (Adolfo) 2015)
Levels of pipes from Check levels and give

landside to airside confirmation to Wolter
Quantifications (09- Calculation (05-05- Update Specifications Update Drawings (in NL)
Open excavation Specification? Drawings?
Trenching for pipes 05-2016) Proposal of different kind of 2016) (Camilo) (09-05-2016) (21-04-2016)
-
and pits - Drainage trenching (19-04-2016)
Quantifications (09- Calculation (05-05- Update Specifications Update Drawings (in NL)
Sheet piles Specification? Drawings? -
05-2016) 2016) (Camilo) (09-05-2016) (21-04-2016)
Pre-design 26-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model Load bearing capacity 28-04-

Fence Fence foundation Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications
2016 solution (Sacmag Nueva York) 2016
Data provided 22-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model

? Power ? Pre-design Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
2016 solution (Sacmag Nueva York)
Pits for street lights
and cameras around
o Determine detail with cover in asphalt
the fence Data provided 22-04- Pre-design (02-05- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model o Determine detail with cover in concrete
? Communication (CM) ? Calculations memo Structural drawings Quantifications Load bearing capacity
2016 2016) solution (Sacmag Nueva York) o Determine detail with cover in unpaved area (grouted
stone pitching at inletpits?)
Leveling of pits due to difference of settlements between construction of Look for a solution (Mijail)
Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
pit and pavement packege (06-05-2016)
Detail Drawings (Hernn) (29-

Pipe-pit conexions Look for a solution Update Specifications Look for a solution (Erick)
04-2016)
Look for a solution (Erick)

Pipe-pipe conexions due to difference of settelments Look for a solution Update Specifications Detail Drawings Structural drawings
(06-05-2016)
Look for a solution (Cesia)
Slotted drain-slotted drain conexion Look for a solution Update Specifications Detail Drawings (Hernn) Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
(06-05-2016)
Slotted drain-collection pit conexion Look for a solution Update Specifications Detail Drawings Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
Data provided (60% (06-05-2016)
- Details - Drainage
design) Look for a solution (Mijail)
Asphalt Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
(06-05-2016)
Look for a solution (Mijail)
Top of pit-pavement conexion Concrete Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
(06-05-2016)
Look for a solution (Mijail)
Unpavement Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
(06-05-2016)
Cover for overflow pit Structural drawings (06-05-2016)
(06-05-2016)
4 type of pipes (perforated & not

French drain Standarization Update Specifications Detail Drawings
perforated)
Total structural designs (with

18
depths)
NAVAIDS
Dreinage
Dreinage
Localizacin de los fosos de Clasificacin de la (aircraft) Cargas acorde con FAA requirements for
transformadores cubierta segn EN 124 structures
Full pavement F900

For spans of 2 feet (0.6 m) or greater in the least direction, the
design will be based on the number of wheels which will fit the
Schoulder pavement E600 span. Wheel loads of 50,000 to 75,000 pounds (22 700 to 34 000
kg) should be considered. [Document FAA requirements for
structures section 2d - Load of aircraft]
Runway Strip area E600
Airside service road Aircraft Tow tractor [Document ITP-SRO-DGACI-SC-015/2015 /

E600
pavement TSN_GACM_BD_0001_V2.0_ENG table 3.7 page 78]
CF&R truck [Document ITP-SRO-DGACI-SC-015/2015 /

In terrain C250
TSN_GACM_BD_0001_V2.0_ENG table 3.7 page 78]
EN 124-2 is applicable to
COVERS gully tops and manhole
tops made of flake
graphite cast iron and/or
spheroidal graphite cast
iron whether in
combination with concrete
or not, with a clear
opening up to and
including 1 000 mm for
covering gullies,
manholes and inspection
chambers for installation
within areas subjected to
pedestrian and/or
vehicular traffic. It is
applicable to manhole
tops and gully tops for use
in - areas which can only
be used by pedestrians
and pedal cyclists (at
least class A 15), -
pedestrian areas and
comparable areas, car
parks or car parking decks
TRANSFORMER PITS / (at least class B 125), -
PULL HOLES the area of kerbside
channels of roads which,
when measured from the
kerb edge, extends a
maximum of 0,5 m into
the carriageway and a
maximum of 0,2 m into
the pedestrian area (at
least class C 250), -
Frames coversofand
carriageways roads grates
shall conform
(including to one of
pedestrian
the following
streets), hard shoulders
requirements:
and parking areas, [Specfor 33all49
00.00
types of Storn
roadDrainage
vehicles (at
Structures]
least class D 400), - areas
1. Gray iron
imposing castings
high wheel shall
meet
loads,thee.g.requirements
docks, aircraft of
ASTM A 48, (at
pavements Class least30B and
class
35B.
E 600), - areas imposing
2. Malleablehigh
particularly iron wheel
castings
shall
loads,meet the
e.g. aircraft
requirements
pavements (class of ASTM A
F 900).
47.
This European Standard is
3.
notSteel castings
applicable in shall
isolation
meet
but onlytheinrequirements
combination of
ASTM
with EN A 27.
124-1 and gives
4. Structural
guidance for steel for
combinations
grates and framesmade
of covers/grating shall of
conform
cast iron to theframes
with
requirements
according to EN of 124-3,
ASTM AEN
283,
124-4, Grade D. or EN
EN 124-5
5. Ductile
124-6. Thisiron castings
European
shall conform
Standard is not toapplicable
the
requirements
to: - cover fillingsof ASTM A
installed
536.
on site, e.g. concrete,
6.
1- Austempered
paving
AGL pitblocks,
in the ductile
etc.;
full -
Baring Capacity iron castings
concave
pavement shallfor
gratings
under theclass
conform
D 400
AGL to theis in
pitinstalled
there 2 meter
requirements
carriageways
Tezontle ASTM
of roads
available- what A is
or
897.
hardload
the shoulders
baring and capacity
concave
at gratings
the bottom of the for AGL
classes F 900 and E 600; -
pit.
gratings/covers
2 AGL pit in the asshoulder
part of
prefabricated
pavement drainage
under the
channels
AGL according
pit there to EN
is 1,5 meter
1433; - floor
Tezontle andisroof
what the load
gullies capacity
baring in buildings at the which
are specified
bottom of theinAGL EN pit.
1253
(all
3 parts);
AGL pit and
in the - surface
road
boxes
construction under the
AGL pit there is 0,4 meter
Tezontle what is the load
baring capacity at the
bottom of the AGL pit.
Legend of colors according to priorities
More critical elements (Packages 2 & 3) To be delivered on 18

Second critical elements (other packages)
Likely out of TASANA scope but it has not been confirmed Status at day: 18-0
Geotechnical engineers.
Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
Fence Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity

Others
Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Warning sign (close to localizer)

Elevated lights
Floodlights (same foundation that Low level windshare alert load bearing capacity of foundation
Input Structural engineers
system) + Piles calculation
PAPI Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
AGL
Signs Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Approach light - low lights Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
approach light - with mast Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Earthing rod Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Wind cone Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Foundation around wind cone Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Equipment shelter Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Automated weather observing system (AWOS) Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
windprofiler
Temperature/humidity profiler
load bearing capacity of foundation

Instrument Landing System - Glide path antenna (ILS) Input Structural engineers
+ Piles calculation
Instrument Landing System - Localizer (ILS) Input Structural engineers
+ Piles calculation
Thunderstorm detection * Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity *
Runway Visual Range (RVR) * Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity *
Ceilometer * Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity*
Near Field Monitor - for Localizer (NFM) * Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity *
NAVAIDS
Near Field Monitor - for Glide path antenna (NFM) * Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity *
Far Field Monitor - for DVOR * Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity *

Doppler VHF Omnidirectional (DVOR) Input Structural engineers
+ Piles calculation
Surface Movement Radar (SMR)
Input Structural engineers piles calculation
Primary/secondary Surveillance Radar (PSR/SSR)
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)

Low level Windshare alert system (LLWAS) Input Structural engineers
+ Piles calculation
Ground Based Augmentation System - VDB antenna (GBAS) Input Structural engineers
+ Piles calculation
Ground Based Augmentation System - Reference receiver load bearing capacity of foundation
Input Structural engineers
(GBAS) + Piles calculation
AGL (AG) Pits 110
PITS & Ducts NAVAIDS Manholes (1 for energy, 1 for communication)
Communication (CM) 2x 110

Low voltage (LV) 150

Apron Service Pit (AP) - Power socket (Remote aprons)
Canopy Sanitary waste disposal & potable water intake stations Input Structural engineers
Slotted drain (cast in situ) Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity
Slotted drain (prefab) Input Structural engineers Load bearing capacity

Drainage pits type 1

Drainage pits from 1x1m to 7x7m
Input Structural engineers Piles calculation?

Oil Separator
Pumping station
Drainage
Gravity system
Concrete pipes. Settlement of crossing pipes at runways and

taxiways and check that do not float
Strength of pipes
Finished
To be delivered on 18th March
In progress
Not started
Progress
gineers. Structural engineers:
teenbakkers Coordinator: Vctor Daz
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Erick) Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Mijail) Drawings
Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Erick)
(90%)
Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Mijail) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Mijail)
(90%)
Drawings
(90%)
Drawings
(90%)
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Mijail) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Drawings
Drawings
(90%)
Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model
(90%)
Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Mijail)
(90%)
Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design (Erick) Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Mijail)
(90%)
Drawings
(90%)
Drawings
(90%)
Drawings
(90%)
Geotechnical solution Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Drawings
Pre-design (Erick)
Drawings
(90%)
Geotechnical solution Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Drawings
Pre-design (Hctor &

Allan)
Geotechnical solution Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Miajil) Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model (Miajil) Drawings
Geotechnical solution Pre-design Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical model Drawings
Pre-design (Hctor &

Allan)
colors according to status
Finished
In progress
Not started
Data
Drawings General data
Included at (package Kind of

Concepto No. Drawing No.
num) foundation
Calculations memo Quantifications
Calculations memo Quantifications Shallow foundation
Same piles
No drawing foundation for
Calculations memo Quantifications (Aprons & LLWAS, VDB GBAS,
Taxiways) Reference GBAS &
Floodlights
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications CX 27 DTL XXXXXX 010 Shallow foundation
Calculations memo (90%) Quantifications Shallow foundation

CX 27 DTL XXXXXX 016
Concepto 1
CX 27 DTL XXXXXX 017 2.0
Calculations memo (90%) Quantifications CX 27 DTL XXXXXX 018 2.0 Shallow foundation
Calculations memo Quantifications 2, 3, Aprons Shallow foundation
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications CAD drawings no 123 2, 3 Shallow foundation
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD drawings no130 2, 3 Shallow foundation
Calculations memo Quantifications CX 27 DTL XXXXXX 108 2, 3 Shallow foundation
(likely out of our scope)
CAD drawings no 120

Piles and
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD drawings no 103 2, 3
foundation
Piles and
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD drawings no 101 2, 3
foundation
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications CAD drawings no 121
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications CAD drawings no 122 2, 3

Same shallow
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications CAD drawings no 124 2, 3 foundation for:
Thunderstorm,
CAD drawings no 102. Same ceilometer y Near
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications foundation than CX 27 DTL 2, 3 Field Monitor for
XXXXXX 107 Localizer & Far
Concepto 7
field Monitor for
CAD drawings no 104 (Suppliar DVOR
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications 2, 3
CAD XXX22P06-1)
Calculations memo (85%) Quantifications 2, 3
Piles and
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD drawings no 106 3
foundation
Piles and
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD drawings no 110
foundation
Piles and
foundation
(Antenna mounted
on the equipment
Quantifications shelter or on the
DVOR - not own
(Antenna mounted on the
equipment shelter or on the foundation)
DVOR - not own foundation)
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD drawings no125 Same piles

foundation for
Calculations memo Quantifications 2, 3 LLWAS, VDB GBAS,
CAD drawings no 107
Reference GBAS &
Calculations memo Quantifications 3 Floodlights
CAD drawings no 108
CX 27 DTL XXXXXX
Calculations memo (75%) Quantifications 2, 3, Aprons shallow foundation
001/002/004/005/008 2.0
Concepto 3.1
Quantifications 2, 3
Same that AGL Pits
Quantifications Same that CX 27 DTL XXXXXX Aprons

Concepto 3.1 001/002/004/005/008 2.0, but
(being updated) just with 2x 110
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD Lie Ping Pitductbank details Aprons
Calculations memo Quantifications CAD Lie Ping -31-DTL-XXXXXX- Aprons

(Lie Ping) 3XX-30
What is the most

XX 31 DTL XXXXXX logical foundation
226/252/253/262 2.0 (los planos solution? Load
Calculations memo Quantifications Concepto 3.1 Aprons
estn siendo modificados por Lie bearing capacity
Ping) under the
structure?

BH 92 TPL XXXXXX 041 2.0 shallow foundation
Settlement
Calculations memo Quantifications BH 92 TPL XXXXXX 002 2.0 2, 3 difference between
pits (10-15 m
BH 92 TPL XXXXXX 025 to 037 distance away
Calculations memo Quantifications 2, 3 from the
2.0
pavementedge)
Piles and
Calculations memo Quantifications BH 92 TPL XXXXXX 039 Aprons
foundation
Different
settlement
between pump
station and gravity
dranaige system
Concepto 16 before pump
station
Check the gravity

system with
settlements all
over the air side
during design life
Settlement of
crossing pipes at
runways and
taxiways and
check that do not
float
ta
General data
Dimensions of foundation Min. Tezontle under

(m) foundation [m]
1.00 x 1.50 x 0.30
1.00 x 0.5 x 0.2
5.00 x 5.00 x 0.30 0.5
2.00 x 2.00 x 0.30 0.3
(1.00X1.50), (1.00X4.00),
0.2
(1.00X5.50)
3 lights: 3.30 x 1.00 x 0.30
5 lights: 6.00 x 1.00 x 0.30 0.5
8 Lights: 10.05 x 1.00 x 0.30
2.00 x 2.00 x 0.84 0.5
0.3
3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 0.3
4.00 x 6.00 x 0.30 0.3
3.50 x 3.50 x 0.30 0.3
5.00 x 6.00 x 0.30 0.3
46.00 x 4.24 x 0.30 0.3
1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 0.3
1.50 x 1.50 x 0.30 0.3
1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 0.3
1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 0.3
1.60 x 1.60 x 0.30 0.3
1.20 x 1.20 x 0.30 0.3
30 x 0.30 0.5
3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 2
3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 1
3.00 x 3.00 x 0.30 0.5
1.85 x 1.85 x 1.07 (tipo 16) and 1 m (pavement type 15) & 0.4 m
1.05 x 1.05 x 1.07 (typo 16)
-
3.25 m;
3.55 (depth +
3.3 x 2.25 m foundation)
(inner);
3.9 x 2.85
(outer) 4.75 m;
Overflow pits 5.05 (depth +
foundation)
4.25 x 2.25 m
5.50 m;
(inner);
5.85 (depth +
4.95 x 2.95
foundation)
(outer)
1.2 x 1.2 m
3.50 m;
(inner);
3.75 (depth +
1.6 x 1.6 m
foundation)
(outer)
Apron Pits
2.25 x 2.25 m
4.00 m;
(inner);
4.30 (depth +
2.85 x 2.85 m
foundation)
(outer)
15 x 10 m
3.50 m;
Oil water (inner);
3.80 (depth +
separator 15.60 x 10.60 m
foundation)
(outer)
6.88 3.29 10.00 2.05 No. New depth 15
7.44 3.53 10.00 3.56 No. New depth 2
No. We had 5 cm
less of wall
9.85 3.17 10.00 4.85 3
thickness and new
depth
No. We had 5 cm Data provided Standarization

more of wall
8.67 5.83 2.75 7
thickness and new
depth
No. We had 5 cm
7.63 3.81 3.1 more of wall 2
thickness
No. New
-4.40 -0.02 3.8 1
dimensions
Structural-
Pre-design (22-12- Mathematical Structural Load bearing
geotechnical Calculations memo Quantities
2016) model Drawings capacity
solution
Structural-
solution
Structural-
solution
Structural-
solution
Structural-
solution
Structural-
solution
Geotechnical
solution
Geotechnical
solution
Geotechnical
solution
Geotechnical
solution
Geotechnical
solution
Geotechnical
solution
Elements Settlements (cm)
No. of
structures Ground
Dimensions
(types) Element Depth [m] improvemen Long term
[m]
t
Sewage station
AGL Substation
Subestacin derivada (SD)
Subestacin derivada (APR)
CREI
? Fuel pits
Others Warning signs (close to localizer)
? All of the structures for RYW 6
? All of the structures for Cargo Aprons
? All of the structures for Maintenance Aprons
? All of the structures for GA
? All of the structures for Heliport

? All of the structures for Military area
1.20 x 1.20 2.50 to 3.50

(inner) + 0.25 (inner) +0.25 Transition
wall thickness foundation
11.334
Standard pit - Area 2.25 x 2.25 2.50 to 4.00
General Service (inner) + 0.30 (inner) + 0.30 Transition
Equipment (GSE) - Aprons wall thickness foundation
1.176
Drainage 2.7 x 2.7 3.00 to 4.00
(inner) + 0.30 (inner) + 0.35 Transition
wall thickness foundation
3.272
1.20 x 1.20 2.50 to 3.50
Transition
(inner) (inner) 11.334
Standard pit - Terminal 2.25 x 2.25 2.50 to 4.00
Transition
side walk - service road (inner) (inner) 1.176
2.70 x 2.70 3.00 to 4.00
Transition
(inner) (inner) 3.272
To be delivered after 8th M
AGL &
NAVAIDs Drainage engineers Structura
engineers
Settlements (cm) NL NL Mxico Mxico (TASANA)
Coordinator
Coordinator:
s: Peter Coordinator:
Short term Wolter Coordinator: Vctor Daz
Vorage / Carlos Daz
Tijssen
Deerns
Structural-
Mathematical Calculations
Data provided Pre-design geotechnical
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Data provided
Structural-
Pre-design geotechnical
(100% model memo
solution
design)
Structural-
Data provided Mathematical Calculations
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Structural-
model memo
solution
Data provided Structural-

Standarizatio Mathematical Calculations
(100% Pre-design geotechnical
n model memo
design) solution
3.184
n model memo
design) solution
1.609
n model memo
design) solution
1.617
3.184
1.609
1.617
be delivered after 8th May due to priorities for packages 2 & 3
Progress
Structural engineers
ASANA) Mexico (EPESA)
Vctor Daz Coordinator: Luis Lpez/Lauro (EPESA) C
Structural Quantification
drawings s
drawings s
drawings s
drawings s
drawings s
Structural-
Calculations Structural Quantification
memo drawings s
solution
Structural Quantification Load bearing

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity
drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity

drawings s capacity
Data
Geotechnical engineers
Reference Drawings
NL Mexico
(latest vesion)
Ing. Concepto
Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers
Valverde No.
All geotech
data
All geotech
data
All geotech
data
All geotech
data
All geotech
data
All geotech
parameters
for fuel pits
Data
Reference Drawings
(latest vesion) Min.
Tezontle
Load of
under
Drawing No. design
foundation
[m]

PROGRESS Structural Design Tender Packages

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

PROGRESS Structural Design Tender Packages

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Legend of colors NAVAIDs

Not started To be delivered on (to GACM): 15-02-17

Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing

Horizontal Horizontal Horizontal

Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing

Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing

Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing

Data provided Pre-design Structural-geotechnical Mathematical Calculations Structural Load bearing

17 TOTAL No. Type of structures

Note: Official translations into Spanish

1.00 x 2.50 x 0.20

3 Signage and stop signs 1.00 x 4.00 x 0.20

1.00 x 5.50 x 0.20

3 lights: 3.30 x 1.00 x

3 Approach light - low lights 5 lights: 6.00 x 1.00 x 0.30

8 Lights: 10.05 x 1.00 x

1 approach light - with mast 3.50 x 3.50 x 0.85

1 PAPI 2.00 x 2.00 x 0.30

Preload and no-preload Shallow 0.30 14.79

Preload and no-preload Shallow 0.30 14.71

Preload and no-preload Z8 27 DTL XXXXXX 522 Shallow 0.30 14.56

Preload and no-preload Shallow 0.50

Status at day: 08-02-17

ts analysis Electrical engineers Structural engineers

Short term settlements Max. Settlement Coordinator: Martin

Coordinator: Vctor Daz Coordinator: Ruud Steenbakkers

Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs

Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs

Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs

Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs

Calculations memo Load bearing capacity (RWYs

In progress (10%) To be delivered on: 8th May

Finished Status at day: 09 - 05-2016

On going (40%) Status at day: 20-01-2017

Elements Settlements [cm] NL Mxico NL Mxico NL

Collection pit 610 mm (for Geotechnical

Geotechnical Volumetric weight of Modulus of subgrade reaction Freatic level depth

Pipe-pit conexions - - - - - Look for a solution Look for a solution

Look for a solution

Look for a solution

Look for a solution Structural drawings

Look for a solution

Shaft type 1 and 2

AGL & NAVAIDs

Data provided Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical Load bearing capacity

Data provided Structural-geotechnical solution Mathematical Load bearing capacity 06-07-

610 mm (for reinforced

2.75 to 3.25 (below Data provided Mathematical

Cortafuego tipo 1 (con

Cortafuego tipo 2 (con

Border of packages of RWYs 300 mm; Data provided Mathematical

Cul de sac/Around Terminal, 400 mm; Data provided Mathematical

Data provided Mathematical

Pipe-pit conexions - - - - - Look for a solution Look for a solution

Look for a solution (Erick)

Look for a solution Structural drawings (06-

Look for a solution (Mijail) Structural drawings (06-

Quantities system pits:

- Same structurs as per Commercial apron (terminal)

Signage for 'meeting point'

o Number of/or distance expansion joints

Mathematical model - Material and loads for pipes

Levels of pipes from Check levels and give

Pre-design 26-04- Structural-geotechnical Mathematical model Load bearing capacity 28-04-