Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Session 3
Government
Usually an order
Eg. IAS/IPS/IFS/DRDO/Army appointed under the order of the President of India.
Usually contains a date by which candidate is expected to report for work
Private
All other places offer acceptance employment contract
A date till which order is validEmployment
Offer letter also referred to as intent letter or intent of offer etc.
Offer letter contains a date by which acceptance needs to be indicated post which a final date to report is given/decided
Certain important points in the offer/emp letter
It should specifically be addressed to prospective candidate
Should have date on which it has been created
Should have the date till which it is valid
Digitally signed/Signed by appropriate authority
Certain clauses in the offer/contract
Misrepresentation of facts may lead to immediate termination.
Certain types of employment requires medical fitnessif found medically unfit, may be asked to leave. Eg. Colour blindness
Details about remuneration/leave/explicit mention not to moonlight.
Always better to have escape clauses
Recall from previous sessions
Employment essentially calls for a future commitment in terms of some effort and time
Which is the case with most of the modern employment/jobs
Reasons under which either party can seek to postpone/defer/renege employment
Employee Employer
Finds another job
May go for higher studies
Medical exigency
Other reasons.
Effect of Macro Economy Recession
Restructuring leaving certain posts redundant
Special cases of restructuring merger/demerger
Closure/rationalizing of business
Consequences of improper handling
Loss of reputation/brand
May be subject to litigations/liability towards breach of contract.
Loss of confidence/trust
Material loss interm softime, valuable resources
Legal aspects of breach of contract
Employer
In case prospective employee reneges on a contract
Employer able to demonstrate that the nature of job to be done by the prospective employee was very specific and niche to
him/her
Suppose employee requests for deferring of joining dates discretion of the employer
Employee
Depends on the various provisions provided in the contract
In case no provisions are there, then employee can claim compensation.
Normally such compensation is towards expenses incurred in preparation for the employment as well as in some cases
Specific guidelines
Explore possibilities of alternative arrangements to honour commitment
Alert the concerned candidates as soon as possible
If an external party involved also keep them in loop of communications
In case of deferred employment be in touch and also think of offering financial assistance if needed
Specific guidelines if offer revoked Try to minimize loss of reputation
Offer assistance
Short term financial assistance Reimbursement towards specific expenses incurred Alternate employment
Beyond the realm of law Ethical considerations
Aspects of fairness
Morality of actions
Use own judgement
In absence of binding legislations, ethical considerations take precedence
Fair and equitable considerations for any action
Prospective employee
In case of confusion better to ask
Read any document/terms and conditions carefully and get things clarified
Ask for relevant information
Do not jump to conclusions
Carefully go through the financial statements
Employer
Some Dos and Donts
Supply accurate information to the prospective candidates
Be clear about the requirements
Be open and accept certain things you do not know rather than committing to them
Session 4
Employment contract
An agreement expressed or implied/written or verbal
Outlines the rights and duties of the employee and the employer towards each other
Most firms have a standard employment contract which is rolled out by making cursory changes
An employment agreement
Within the ambit of the law of the land
Limited usage of ambiguous terms/references avoid company specific/technical jargon
Between two parties In case of dispute the weaker party is given
benefit of doubt
Employment at will
An employer can terminate the employment
Any reason No reason With or without notice
Origins
British laws vis--vis USA
British laws presumed long term hiring and reasonable notice of
termination
Indian law shave a British origin
Termination
Due to death
Due to voluntary retiring/attain super annuation
On grounds of ill health
Disciplinary action ESO
Duration of contract is over Others
Retrenchment defined in IDA
Means the termination by the employer of the service or a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a
punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not include
Voluntary retirement of the workman; or
Retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and
the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or
Termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non- renewal of the contract of employment between the employer
and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained
therein; or
Termination of the service of a workman on the ground of continued ill health
Session 5
ArticlesConstitution of India
Article 13 Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights
Article19Fundamental rights FR not absolute - Reasonable restrictions 19(2)-19(6) Article23Prevention of forced
labour/human trafficking
Forced labour
Peoples Union for Democratic Rights Vs. Union of India (Asiad Case)
Forced labour given a very wide interpretation
Physical force Force exerted by some legal provision
Force because of various compulsions like hunger, poverty, destitution
Any factor which deprives a person of alternatives
Also includes work extracted without remuneration
Also includes contract entered into through consent
Section15IndianContractActCoerciondefined
Unlawful detaining or threatening to detain a property to the prejudice of any person whatsoever
Section 19 Indian Contract Act void ability of agreements without free consent Coercion Fraud/misrepresentation
Contract is voidable
Section 73 Indian Contract Act Compensation of loss or damage due to breach of Contract
Contract broken Party who suffers entitled to compensation Compensation not to be given for remote and indirect
loss
Section 74 Indian Contract Act Compensation of breach of contract where penalty stipulated for
A sum named in the contract
Any other stipulation by way of penalty
reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount or the penalty stipulated
Most of the modern employment contract contains some reference to an EMPLOYMENT BOND
It is like any other contract/or an additional clause within the employment contract
Multiple opportunities and employee would also like to maximize his utility
EMPLOYMENT BOND
Not specified
but project Forced labour not a valid bond - can be
3 Article 23 is violated
critical - special considered an offence
fixed period
Employed for
4 Fixed duration t @ salary Article 23 violated Forced labour considered as an offence
s pm, return t*s
Section 73
Loss l which Very weak bond difficult to enforce
5 Fixed employer has to prove
occurs to be paid difficult to estimate accurately the loss
extent of loss
Valid so long as at
Employee may be asked to return the
employees discretion.
9 Fixed Foreign bond fb money failing which would amount to
Employee liable to pay
unjust enrichment
the required expense
Article 23 violated,
Non-release of
Section 15, 19 and Not a valid bond offence is committed
10 Fixed personal
Section 75 of Indian or void contract citing coercion.
documents
Contract Act
Employment Bond
Session 6
Session learning objectives
See a practical application of usage of the Employment Bond through a case study
Understand the conditions under which the Bond is being used from the perspective of the employer
Validity of the employment bond
Case facts
H Employment Bond within the Airline industry.
H The two parties involved are Jan Peters a former Navy Pilot and Spanish Air Pilot, with Jet Airways undertook training and
soon within a year has joined Sahara Airlines (a rival of Jet Airways)
H Jet Airways thought of protecting his interest through the use of Employment Bond as huge costs incurred as training
expenses
The story
Jet Airways needed pilots for new series of aircrafts
Decided to recruit new pilots First officers and commanders
Train the man equip them with appropriate licenses
Induct them into the fold probation for some time then confirmation
But....
Jan Peters resigned from his job on 6th December, 1999 and joined Sahara Airlines next day
Breach of psychological contract reduction of FDA Aggrieved because of change in seniority rules
Jet Airways claimed breach of contract and losses (8 more pilots had joined Sahara), disruptions in ops.
Filed for compensation of Rs. 6,94,000 + 24% rate of interest per year from date of filing the case until realization of the
same amount
Yes he should be allowed to fly 737 series as he also has a family to look after....
The skill acquired proprietary in nature
is not Already collected Claimed Compensation justified
Sr no. Detail Amt. RS
1 Demand Draft 2,50,000
2 Indemnity Bond 7,50,000
3 Deduction from FDA 4,56,000
4 Total 14,56,000
Rs.6,94,000 with 24% interest per year
Actual training cost incurred was @ Rs. 11,31,400
Well beyond reasonable compensation
Moreover it is clear that employer has actually given a loan for training
Counter view
Modernising the fleet commercial interest
Use of negative covenant also indicates protection of self interest and commercial interest
Expense of training imparted was not from own investments, but it was also being recovered from employee
Enforcement
Injunction granted Jan cannot fly Boeing 737
Deter other pilots
Peters
Non-Enforcement
JA claimed loss Cut corners to save on training expenses
Not a valid argument as DGCA regulates the requirements
However, this step would be against competition and against the free market
JP forced to do other jobs not using his complete skill/potential
There are a lot of pilots waiting to be recruited and trained and deployed. Also help competition Implication
Key takeaways
Application of a combination of illustrative scenarios prior deposit + indemnity bond + recovery from salary
Breach of contract
Basis of calculation of the compensation in case of breach of contract
Introduced the restrictive covenants
Session 7
Types of properties
Real property Land, Real estate, Plant machinery Essentially ownership resulting from Cap Ex. Type of expenses
Personal propertySmall things of possessioncars, jewellery, tables, chairs, pens, erasers
Intellectual property the property as a result of thought/intellectual activity expression of thought
Protect
From a perspective
Dont protect
To protect or not to protect
purely economic
Protection has the risk of creating a monopoly
Leading to exploitationNot in the larger public interest
Man being a rational person would expect to maximize his utility
Which also implies that effort towards that activity, which has more return
Incentive/reward for their effort
Different types of IP
Copyright
Granted to authors of original works
Includes literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, photographs, designs also
Protection is available without registration.
Owner however has the rights to transfer the copyrights, reproduce the work. Expression
Patent Generally, for new invention New invention means any invention or technology hasnot been
anticipated by publication in any document
Frivolous invention -Intended use may cause serious harm to human, animal, plant life, health or environment
Used in the country elsewhere in the world
Public domain/state of art
Different types of IP
Exceptions or New form of old substance
Theories/ discovery of living- non living things
not much value addition 13
Different types of IP
Exceptions to Patent
Something obtained by cursory changes to the mixtures/constituents
Method of agriculture or horticulture
Any process for medicinal, surgical, curative, prophylactic diagnostic, therapeutic or other treatments for human
beings or for animals
Computer program or algorithms
An invention which in effect is traditional knowledge. Literary, musical, or artistic work (photographs, films)
Different types of IP
Exceptions to Patent
Inventions related to atomic energy Presentation of information-Plants and animals in whole or any part there of
Different types of IP
Trade SecretsDefinition given by TRIPS
Information must be a secretnot easily available in the public domain
Having some commercial value Subject of reasonable steps by the owners to keep it secret Eg.The secret formulae of
Coke
Trademark Patent Copyright TradeSecret
Different types of IP
Trademark
Patent
Different types of IP
Plagiarism vis--vis IP
Plagiarism ordinarily defined as:Practice of taking someone elses work or ideas and passing them off as ones own
Plagiarism has also led to the loss of jobs in many cases
Always better to cite/mention the appropriate reference for any data, picture, photograph which is not your own
19
New Challenges
Internet has sprung up new challenges on development and usage of a lot of things including softwares
Open Source (OS)a special case of copyright Licensees are free to use OS for any purpose
Make copies of OS and distribute them without royalties to a licensor
Also, free to create derivatives of OS
Free to access the source code and modify and develop something new
This means
As an employer, clear policies with respect to piracy/licenses/email usage/sharing of materials etc.
Clear indication of ownership of IP with some sort of sharing
As employee, careful usage of IT related infra
Company vs individual
Companiesabletoaffordthehighpricesoffilingandprotectingthepatent
Companyinvariablyhasaccesstomoreresourcescomparedtoanindividual(Exceptionsmaybethere)
Individualinventorsoftenlacktheexpertisetorunasuccessfulbusiness
19But
Juryruledinfavourofthecompany
Argumentwasthatideaasaresultofworkingonthecurrentproject
NotonlywasPeterconvictedofcrime,buthisownnotebookswhichheusedtoworkwerealsoconfiscated
Genesisownershiptransferredaspercontract
Employees
InIndiasomeoptionsintermsofinvokingSection27ofICAagainstRCs
Dependsoncasetocasebasis
Readandclarifythetermsandconditionsofthecontract
22Thus
Eveninknowledgeeconomynothinghaschangedmuchfromtheviewpointoflabourandcapital
TheIPRregimehasbeenabletomaintainalienationaspect
AlthoughtherearefundamentaldifferencestoUSandEuropemarkets,TRIPSagreementtiltsthebalanceinfavourofUS
Employers
Gettheemployeestorelinquishtheintellectualpropertyrightsasapartoftheemploymentcontract
Claimownershipasemployerforallsortsofintellectualproperty
Maygivesomecredit/rewardsuitably
UseofRCcontestedinIndia
Gardenleave
Employees
InIndiasomeoptionsintermsofinvokingSection27ofICAagainstRCs
Dependsoncasetocasebasis
Readandclarifythetermsandconditionsofthecontract
22Thus
Eveninknowledgeeconomynothinghaschangedmuchfromtheviewpointoflabourandcapital
TheIPRregimehasbeenabletomaintainalienationaspect
AlthoughtherearefundamentaldifferencestoUSandEuropemarkets,TRIPSagreementtiltsthebalanceinfavourofUS
24
Re-cap Session 10
Understood the peculiarities of the new age work and the work space
In spite of the peculiarities relationship between the worker and the capital remains the same
Treaties
Berne Convention
Paris Convention
Rome Convention
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property TRIPS
Treaty signed in 1995 by members of WTO
Restraint of trade
Every agreement by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that
extent void
Exceptions
In recognition of his invention KV was given a citation signed by Jeff Bezos and a piece of puzzle
Does a puzzle piece qualify as an adequate consideration for handing over an invention to the company?
The story
Kivin Vergese an innovator, inventor and an entrepreneur focusing on solutions related to online advertising
Sold off Brandport to Livegamer
Grappling with problems of online advertising
Presented his solution to Amazon on the first day of his employment
The story
Re-cap Session 11
Two practical examples of IP related conflict between employer and employee
Provision related to restraint of trade as per Indian Contract Act
Peculiarities of Indian IPR regime vis--vis the TRIPS agreement
Introduced the specific forms of Restrictive Covenants
8/30/2016
1
Specific forms of Restrictive covenants
Non Disclosure Agreement
Non Compete Agreement
Non Solicitation Agreements
Such RCs applicable to middle to senior level of employees rather than entry or junior level
8/30/2016
2
Session 12
Session 12 learning objectives
Understand the specific forms of RC
The benefits and pitfalls of using RC
Certain peculiarities of RC
Enforceability of RC
Precautions to be taken by employer/employee/prospective employer
8/30/2016
3
Why use Restrictive Covenants
Protect business interest
Prevent loss of a key resource
Precaution against competition
Reduce vulnerability due to resignation of key employees
8/30/2016
4
What exactly are RCs
RCs are
Specific agreements/clauses within agreements
Between employees and employers
That outline specific restrictions on the employee
On the specific usage/dissemination of information
That employee became privy solely due to nature of work with the employer
8/30/2016
5
So where is the conflict
Employer
Wants to protect his business interest
Would like to have minimum competition
Control over important resources
Employee
Right to livelihood
Right to use the full array of knowledge/skill
Would also like to maximize economic gain
Right to pursue trade/occupation
8/30/2016
6
Complexities arise
No dedicated framework/law/provisions
Many conflicting rulings and judgements at both state and national level
Left to the judicial interpretation
8/30/2016
7
Specific types of RCs in use
Non Disclosure Agreement
Non Compete Agreement
Non Solicitation Agreements
8/30/2016
8
Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
NDA involves
Employee to take reasonable steps to maintain confidentiality of information
Not to disclose confidential information of company to any person, business unrelated to the company
Except under inevitable circumstances legally called upon
Recall Golikari case how it was inferred that confidential information was compromised
By extension refrain from carrying out similar nature of business also
8/30/2016
9
Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
NDA illustrative clause
He/she commits not to reveal any sort of knowledge/information/data/skill learnt as a result of the nature of job to be
utilized/deployed/be advantageous to other organizations
8/30/2016
10
Non Compete Agreement
Non Compete Agreement
A direct application of restraint of trade
Does not breach Article 19(1)(g) reasonable restrictions
Within the limitations of Section 27 of ICA too (though decided on case by case basis)
Explicitly forbid the employee or the ex-employee from joining the direct competitor
Recall Jan Peters Case, Corporate Bondage Case
8/30/2016
11
Non Compete Agreement
Illustrative clause
During this period you shall not accept employment similar in nature either full time or part time with any other employer
He/she is committing not to join or be associated with any organization in any manner whatsoever - where
knowledge/information/data/exposure, made available to him by the overseas opportunity is likely to be utilized/deployed/be
advantageous to him and/or to such organization.
8/30/2016
12
Non Solicitation Agreement
Non solicitation entails
Prevents an employee or a former employee from indulging in business with the companys employees or customers
Against the interest of the company
Recall Rocket Singh Salesman of the year movie
Solicitation question of fact
Current employees vis--vis former employees
8/30/2016
13
Non Solicitation Agreement
Non solicitation clause looks like
Both parties agree that for a period of 2 years from the date of termination of the agreement to which this appendix is
attached, including termination by either party with or without cause, either directly or indirectly solicit, induce or encourage
any employee(s) to terminate their employment with or to accept employment with any competitor, supplier or customer of the
other party, nor shall either party cooperate with any other in doing or attempting to do so.
Solicit/induce or encourage includes, but is not limited to (a) initiating communications with an employee relating to
possible employment or (b) offering bonuses or additional compensation to encourage employees to terminate their
employment with and accept employment with a competitor, supplier or customers (c) referring employees to personnel agents
employed by competitors, suppliers, or customers of the soliciting party
8/30/2016
14
Relevant legal provisions in India
Article 19 (1) (g)
Section 10, 27 & sections related to compensation of Indian Contract Act
Sections related to the Information Technology Act
Sections of Indian Penal Code
8/30/2016
16
Likely scenarios to use RC
RCs may be used
Limited use/narrow use/legitimate reason to use RC
Tailor made for the unique situations
Nature of job really involves dealing with sensitive/strategic/proprietary information
Not to be used for all levels but for middle or senior level employers
Enforceability however decided by the court may vary from case to case
8/30/2016
17
The twist of Termination
Protected employee
workman under IDA
State specific labour law
Follow proper procedures for termination
For termination due to misconduct also follow proper procedures adhere to principals of natural justice
Post termination
Indian Courts however sympathetic towards employee/ex-employee
Right to livelihood prevails over an agreement between an employer and employee(ex)
Generally courts do not allow post employment restrictions on account of unfairness in restraint of use of acquired skill
8/30/2016
18
Enforceability of RC
Restrictive covenants have limited utility
Various provisions of IPC and Information Technology Act, Contract Act and the Articles can be invoked
Conflicting judgements
Decided on case by case basis
8/30/2016
21
Session learning summarized
Session learning summarized
Specific forms of Restrictive Covenants
NCA/NDA/NSA
These too like training bond can be a sub contract or a separate clause within the employment agreement
Also saw illustrative clauses
Restrictions during employment is valid/Restrictions post employment decided on case to case basis
8/30/2016
22
Session 14
Learning objective
See the application of one of the restrictive covenants Non disclosure Agreement (NDA)
How the validity was determined/interpreted
Conditions of applicability of RC specifically NDA
Through the Priya Puri Vs American Express case
8/30/2016
3
Session 14
Learning objective
See the application of one of the restrictive covenants Non disclosure Agreement (NDA)
How the validity was determined/interpreted
Conditions of applicability of RC specifically NDA
Through the Priya Puri Vs American Express case
8/30/2016
3
Session 14
Learning objective
See the application of one of the restrictive covenants Non disclosure Agreement (NDA)
How the validity was determined/interpreted
Conditions of applicability of RC specifically NDA
Through the Priya Puri Vs American Express case
8/30/2016
3
The bone of contention
The information of customer details termed as trade secrets
Can the bank prevent customers from leaving them
Can the bank command ownership over the relationship of the executive with the customer
8/30/2016
5
The story
Priya Puri joined American Express credit card sales division, circa 2001
Aspiring young executive worked hard
Soon promoted as Relationship manager in the Wealth Management Division around 2003
8/30/2016
6
The arguements
Employer
Priya Puris exit may be a threat to the business
Confidentiality of customer data
Employee
Undue harassment
False baseless allegations
With a motto to force to remain in the job
Malafide intention of suppressing information
Good ratings consistently
The names of customers available in public domain
8/30/2016
9
The decision
It was decided in favour of Priya Puri
No injunction was given for lack of sufficient evidence
It was also concluded that just a customer list cannot be claimed as IP specifically Trade Secret or Copyright
8/30/2016
10
The logic for the decision
It was inferred that
Priya Puri had already resigned and post resignation demanded for the list of customers
It raises suspicion as to why the employee would cooperate given that it was already known that Priya Puri had resigned
Moreover if she had forced any junior employee to give the password then she could have compiled the list on her own
Customer has not signed any sort of exclusivity agreement with the bank free to bank with anyone
8/30/2016
11
The logic for the decision
It was inferred that
Consistently good ratings in previous appraisals
Some loopholes in the conduct of the inquiry/conference on 4th October
Priya Puri was performing well and hence it seems that she was already in possession of some sort of information, if so it
seems redundant that she would force someone to part with the same
Under plea of confidentiality bank cannot claim monopoly over customers/restrain the customers from banking with other
banks
8/30/2016
12
Key takeaways
Customer list cannot be claimed to be confidential/propietary information
Skills, aptitudes, manual/mental ability Master (employer) cannot claim control/ownership
Restraint of trade after seizure of master-servant relationship is not valid subject to test of reasonableness
Restraint during employment is valid
8/30/2016
13
Session learning summarized
Session learnings:
Restrictions during employment are valid
Restrictions post employment need to be deliberated upon for restraint of trade in this case it was construed as restraint of
trade
Employer cannot seek for restraint/application of non disclosure for the general knowledge gained during employment
Customer lists/details/relationship built customers cannot be brought under intellectual properties
Common information also cannot be considered as trade secret
8/30/2016
14
Session 15
Session Learning Objectives:
The application of Non Solicitation Agreement through the case of Wipro Vs Beckman Coulter
Conditions under which Non Solicitation may be valid
Understand how Beckman Coulter exploited the loophole within the NSA
How the validity was interpreted in the case of Wipro vs Beckman Coulter
Case facts
Wipro Biomed Biomedical Division of Wipro
Employing 80 people across 7 offices wide network
Specialized, trained, competent technical and marketing executives providing consulting, installation and calibration,
maintenance and back up services of biomedical equiments
Case fact
Beckman Coulter leading US MNC
Biomedical industry comprehensive product portfolios
Catered to pharma, biotech, and educational institutes
Wipro Biomed was the soul distributor of Beckman Coulter in India close to 17 years
The Argument
Wipro Beckman Coulter
Soul distributor of Beckman Amongst other set of arguments
Coulter equipment also given
The advertisement released in General advertisement and
leading national dailies violate cannot be construed as
the NSA solicitation
experience of working with or Any restraint of employment
having handled Beckman Coulter would amount to violation of
products and/or similar products Section 27
would be a distinct advantage
The decision
The wordings of the advertisement definitely amount to solicitation
However in this case Beckman Coulter was forbidden from taking out further such advertisements or using other such
means to lure the employees of Wipro
The employees who had resigned from Wipro however were free to join Beckman Coulter
It was also referred to Arbitration
The Rationale
The rationale for the decision
The major difference stems from the fact that two firms are involved in the contract and restriction is being imposed on the
firms and not on employees
Thus question of restraint of trade does not arise unless Wipro had signed an agreement to that effect with their employees
The right for the employee to seek better opportunities cannot be curtailed
Both employer and employee have equal rights to terminate the contract
The Rationale
The rationale for the decision
Restricting the employee from joining any past, present or prospective customer is void and comes under purview of restraint
of trade
Employer cannot prevent his employee to join other firms on the grounds of competition compared to that of the vendor
purchaser
-in the latter case it is assumed that both the parties are on equal footing
Restrictions during the employment are valid, but restrictions post employment are not valid
Takeaways
Restrictive covenants during the employment/term of the contract are perfectly valid and do not violate Section 27
Restrictions post employment are not valid
Unlike in other settings, there is no provision of partial restraint in India
Non solicitation agreements or clauses per se are not rendered invalid
Re-Cap Session 15
We understood through the Wipro Vs Beckman case
NSA or such clauses per se are valid
Question of Partial restraint/partial restriction is not considered in India
Restraint during employment/enforcement of contract is perfectly valid
Restraint post employment generally is not considered valid as far as master servant relationship is considered
Difference between restraint and solicitation
Session learning Objectives
The focus would be to look at alternatives from the employers perspective
Within the legal framework, can the employer do anything at all
Can Garden Leave be considered a panacea for the employers
Applicability of Garden Leaves in India
Restrictive Covenants
X Non Disclosure Agreement
X Non Compete Agreement
X Non Solicitation Agreement
Restriction during employment valid
Restriction post employment
Deliberated on case to case basis
Generally can be taken as void
The shortcomings of RCs
Limitations of The three major forms of RCs we have discussed from the perspective of employer
Variation in enforceability Pre, post and during employment
The logic and decisions vary from case to case creating ambiguity
Uncertainty in the applicability
No question of partial restriction within the Indian framework
Terms and conditions of services also changed employment contract also changed
You shall be bound and undertake that you will not directly or indirectly, whether through partnership or as a shareholder,
joint venture partner, collaborator, employee, consultant or agent or in any other manner whatsoever, whether for profit or
otherwise carry on any business, which competes directly or indirectly with the whole or any part of the business of visa
processing services or having/conducting business similar to the business conducted by the company for a period of 3(three)
months after serving the notice period and ceasing to be an employee of the Company.
The provision of Garden Leave
The clause related to Garden Leave
You shall also be bound to comply with the conditions of Non Compete and Non Solicitation as set out in the terms and
conditions. The Company shall pay you compensation which shall be equal to 3 (three) month's remuneration last drawn by
you at the time of your termination or resignation. Please note that the company shall apply this clause at its sole discretion and
you shall not claim it as a right.
The decision and logic
Decision Logic
The application of Non Compete Agreement through the case of Pepsi Vs Coke
Conditions under which Non Compete Agreement
Understand applicability of NCA in India
How the validity was interpreted in this case and some other learnings
Case facts
Pepsi & Coke
Both are giants in the soft drink industry Arch rivals
The cola industry needs a sensitive and responsive supply chain
A dedicated sales team forms the backbone of the firms
It takes time to develop the various contacts constant servicing/interaction needed
Case facts
In this case
A certain employee of Pepsi resigned and joined Coke at substantially higher emoluments
Subsequently many employees left Pepsi to join Coke
Few of them withdrew their acceptance and decided to stay with Pepsi
Pepsi did not initiate any action against them
However Pepsi wanted to prevent the others from joining Coke
The different agreements signed
Different provisions of the employment contract signed by employees of Pepsi
Three months notice period for termination of employment
Confidentiality Agreement
Non Compete Restraining the employees from accepting employment with competitor for a period of 12 months after
ending their employment with Pepsi
The story
Pepsi Coke
Built their network from scratch Entered Indian market through
the acquisition route
Huge investments incurred to set
up a reliable supply chain Coke acquired Parle
network
Developed a strong technical, finance, production and sales team
The bone of contention
The sales team leaving enmasse can they be prevented from joining Coke
Restraining via non compete valid?
Can an employee be prevented from taking up jobs with better prospects under the garb of protection against unfair
competition?
The Argument
Pepsi
Accused Coke of carrying out the poaching with a Malefide intention
Induced key marketing personnel to terminate their contract with Pepsi
Coke interfering with Pepsis business
Coke
False allegations
Many employees had not directly joined Coke but had worked elsewhere
Acted in interest of their business
Employees have a right to better their prospects and service conditions
Offers made based on merit
The decision
The court did not grant injunction against the employees who wanted to join Coke
Elaborated on competition and its importance for trade
The actions/deeds of Coke were not with Malefide intentions rather with the aim of driving the competitor (Pepsi) out of
business
Coke was furthering their business interest which is again legal
Post employment restrictions are not legal
The Rationale
The rationale for the decision
Since post employment restrictions are void and in violation of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, the Court cannot give
Injunction against something prohibited by law
Mr. Bose an independent consultant running a placement agency and hence cannot be said that he has been instigated by
Coke
Employees have a right to seek better opportunities and cannot be curtailed by an injunction
The Rationale
The rationale for the decision
Courts cannot curtail the freedom of employees to better their prospects and service conditions
Employees are well within their rights to terminate their employment which the courts cannot restrict/curtail
Courts cannot step in matters pertaining to competition
Pepsi too had employed employees who were earlier employed with other MNCs and hence now Pepsi cannot claim relief
and plead that their employees not be allowed to join Coke or any other such competitor
Takeaways
The key learnings from this case:
Restrictive covenants during the employment/term of the contract are perfectly valid and do not violate Section 27
Restrictions post employment are not valid
Employees have a right to terminate their employment as per the provisions of the contract similar to that of the employer
Employees also have a right to avail better prospects and better service conditions
Session Learning Summarized
We understood through this case
Restraint during employment valid
Restrictions post employment are void
Difference between termination of contract vis--vis breach of contract
Both parties have equal right to terminate the contract as specified
Re-Cap Session 17
In Pepsi Vs Coke we understood that
Restrictions during employment are valid
Restrictions post employment need to be deliberated upon for restraint of trade in this case it was construed as restraint of
trade
No provision of partial restraint in India
Non Compete Agreement stand alone may not be very useful inherent problems of clearly defining the competition
Session 18
Session Learning Objectives:
Some international perspectives of Employment Relations
Revisit the new knowledge based economy
Revisit the redundancy of geographical boundaries in the modern day globalized economy
MNCs and the rights of the employees Need for global labour standards
Some important changes to economy
Evident changes to the economy
Demographic change Increase of women in the workforce
Shift from manufacturing to services economy
Brawn to brain
Reduction of government owned firms and increase of private sector
Rapid decline in collectivization around the world
An increasing trend of self employment
Some statistics
View
Assumption of more cooperative relations between employer and employee
More autonomy/flexibility
Importance for brain rather than brawn
Counter view
knowledge work is a misnomer
much of the so called work is mundane
The work more often than not lacks discretion and complex analysis
The fine line of wage work
knowledge work has not eliminated low skilled jobs
So What
Pressures of globalization leads to
Deregulation greater flexibility
Weakened trade unions and employment relations
Job insecurity, rise of precarious work
Lead to migration
Possible deterioration in quality of work
Unions being national actors are not able to face the onslaught unless some international agency supports them