INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

Name of Employee RODERICK L. TIPOLO Name of Rater EVA T. NOREGA, Ed. D.

Position T-III Position P-I
Review Period 1ST SEM S.Y 2016-17 Date of Review 12-28-2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division DEPED/LEYTE DIVISION

WEIGHT ACTUAL
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE RESULT RATIN SCOR
KRA INDICATORS G E

KRA 1 1. Teaching 35%

Learning
Process 1. Prepared at least 135
complete lesson plans
throughout the rating
period.
2. Utilized Visual and
Printed IMs and other
manipulative insructional
materials that are
appropriate to the lessons
June 5% 5- Prepared 180 and above
March complete daily teaching
plans
4- Prepared 158-179 and
above complete daily
teaching plans
3- Prepared 135-157 and
above complete daily
teaching plans
2- Prepared 114-134 and
above complete daily
teaching plans
1- Prepared 113 and below
complete daily teaching
June - 12% plans
March
5- Utilized 5 varied
instructional materials
4- Utilized 4 varied
objective.
3a. (For classroom
advisers) Established and
maintained a classhome
that is conducive for
learning throughout the
year with at least 75% of
the Division Standard
Classroom Evaluation
Checklist achieved.
(Refer to the Division Standard
Classroom Evaluation Checklist)
3b. (For special subject
teachers) Prepared an
updated board structuring
and other required of the
subject/assignment with
75% accomplishment.
instructional materials
3- Utilized 3 varied
instructional materials
2- Utilized 3 varied
instructional materials
1- Utilized 1 type of
June - 9% instructional materials
March
5- Met 96-100% of the items
on the Division Standard
Classhome Evaluation
Checklist
4- Met 86-95% of the items
on the Division Standard
Classhome Evaluation
Checklist
3- Met 75-85% of the items
on the Division Standard
Classhome Evaluation
Checklist
2- Met 50-74% of the items
on the Division Standard
Classhome Evaluation
Checklist
1- Met only 49% and below
of the items on the Division
Standard Classhome
June Evaluation Checklist
March
5- Accomplished 100% of the
items
4- Accomplished 86% - 99%
(Refer to monitoring checklist)
4. Taught all competencies
in the Budget of Lesson in
all subject areas with 75%
mastery.
5. Constructed/updated 80
complete indexed IMs/
eIMs (10 per subject area
assigned)
of the items
3- Accomplished 75% - 85%
of the items
2- 29-59% of pupils were
able to get 75% MPS in the
class
1- 28% and below of pupils
June were able to get 75% MPS in
March 5% the class
5- 95% and above of
competencies were taught
with at least 75% mastery
4- 85 94% of competencies
were taught with at least
75% mastery
3- 75 - 84% and above of
competencies were taught
with at least 75% mastery
2- 65 - 74% and above of
competencies were taught
with at least 75% mastery
1- 64% and below of the
June 4% competencies were taught
March with at least 75% mastery
5- 100 or more complete
indexed IMs/ eIMs were
constructed or updated
4- 90 99 complete indexed
IMs/ eIMs were constructed
or updated
 3- 80 89 complete indexed
IMs/ eIMs were constructed
or updated
2- 70 79 complete indexed
IMs/ eIMs were constructed
or updated
1- 69 and below complete
indexed IMs/ eIMs were
30% constructed or updated
KRA 2 Pupils/
Students 1. Attained an average June - 5%
Outcomes MPS of 75% in the NAT March

5 attained 75% and above

MPS
4 - attained 70 - 74% MPS
3 - attained 65 - 69% MPS
2. Attained 0 drop-out 2 - attained 60 64% MPS
rate in all classes handled June - 3% 1 - attained 59% and below
March MPS

5 - 0 drop-out rate
4 - 0.1-1.0% drop-out rate
3. Zero-out non-readers
3 - 1.1-2.0% drop-out rate
(for Grades 1 to 10) June 3% 2 - 2.1-3.0% drop-out rate
(Based on EGRA/PHIL-IRI
March 1 - above 3.0% drop-out rate
result)

5 - zero non-reader
4 - non-reader is only 1 2%
of the class
3 - non-reader is only 3 4%
of the class
4. Zero-out non-
numerates
(Based on EGMA and
other tests)
5. Increased the number
of readers from non-
reader to frustration level;
from frustration to
instructional/ independent
level in all classes handled
(Note: Non-advisers will
take the reading
performance of the
classes handled)
6. Zero-out failure rate in
all classes handled
2 - non-reader is only 5 6%
of the class
June - 3% 1 - non-reader is 7% and
March above of the class
5 - zero non-numerate
4 - non-numerates is only 1
2% of the class
3 - non-numerates is only 3
4% of the class
2 - non-numerates is only 5
6% of the class
June 3% 1- non-numerates is 7% and
March above of the class
5 increased 5 readers from
current reading level to the
next higher reading level
4 - increased 4 readers from
current reading level to the
next higher reading level
3 - increased 3 readers from
current reading level to the
next higher reading level
2 - increased 2 readers from
current reading level to the
next higher reading level
1 - increased 1 reader from
June 4% current reading level to the
March next higher reading level
5 - zero failure rate
7a. Updated school 4 - average of 1 - 2% failure
records (for teachers with rate
advisory class) 3 - average of 3 - 4% failure
SF 1 rate
SF 2 2- average of 5 - 6% failure
SF 3 rate
SF 5 June - 3% 1- average of 7% and above
LIS Portal March failure rate
Class Record
Form 138 5 - all indicators listed below
Form 137 were met:
Grade Sheets Class Record/ Grade
Summative Test
Sheets reflected the
Questions with TOS
basis of pupils ratings
SReYA
in all subject areas
ECCD checklist/ card
handled
LIS was updated on or
before the deadline
Updated SF 2 every
month
Updated SF 1 and SF 3
three weeks after the
opening of classes
Updated Form 138 and
137 every quarter
7b. Updated school Updated Form 138,
records (for special subject 137 and SF 5 at the
teachers) end of the school year
Four Periodical Tests
with complete Table of
Specifications
4 - lacks 1 school record
8. Prepared and submitted 3 - lacks 2 school records
the following reports as 2 - lacks 3 school records
required: 1 - lacks 4 school records
Quarterly Periodical
Exam Results (MPS) 5 all School Records
Oral Reading Test updated and/or submitted
4 lacks 1 school record
Results ( PHIL-IRI
3 - lacks 2 school records
Oral and Silent, 2 - lacks 3 school records
EGRA, MTB-MLE, 1 - lacks 4 school records
Numeracy Test) June 3%
Form 48 March 5- Prepared and submitted
Action Plan/ CIP all reports 2 days earlier
Monthly Activities than the deadline
Accomplishment 4- Prepared and submitted
Report all reports 1 day before the
ECCD: Pre/ Mid/ Post deadline
Test 3- Prepared and submitted
SReYA Result all reports on the deadline
Pre-test/ Post-test 2- Prepared and submitted
Nutritional Status all reports 1 day after the
Report deadline
1- Prepared and submitted
PFSTT (Grade IV-VI)
GAD Report all reports 2 days or more
Pupils Rank list after the deadline
Guidance Action Plan
Others (pls. Specify)

9. Conducted counselling
sessions with supporting
evidences
 5 - Conducted counselling
sessions 5 times or more per
June 3% month
March 4 - Conducted counselling
sessions 4 times or more per
month
3 - Conducted counselling
sessions 3 times or more per
1. Conducted quarterly month
PTA meetings with the 2 - Conducted counselling
following MOVs: sessions twice per month
Agenda 1 - Conducted counselling
Attendance Sheets sessions once per month
Minutes of the
Meetings
Others (pls. specify)

5 - Conducted 5 or more PTA

meetings with complete
10%
2. Attended School/District MOVs
KRA 3 School and
4- Conducted 4 PTA
Community Meetings June 3%
meetings with complete
Involvement March
MOVs
3- Conducted 3 PTA
meetings with MOVs
2- Conducted 2 PTA
meetings with MOVs
1- Conducted 1 PTA meeting
with MOVs

5 95 100% attendance in
school/district meetings on
time

3. Initiated the conduct of
Brigada Eskwela activities
4. Participated in at least
three civic- oriented
activities
1. Attended in-service
trainings of at least 3 days
conducted by DepEd
4 85 94% attendance in
June 2% school/district meetings on
March time
3 75 84% attendance in
school/district meetings on
time
2 55 74% attendance in
school/district meetings on
time
1 1 54% attendance in
school/district meetings on
time
5- Conducted 4 Brigada
Eskwela activities with
complete documentation
4- Conducted 3 Brigada
Eskwela activities with
Year round 3% complete documentation
3- Conducted 2 Brigada
Eskwela activities with
complete documentation
2- Conducted 1 Brigada
Eskwela activity with
complete documentation
1- Conducted Brigada
Eskwela activity with no
documentation
5 - Participated 5 or more
civic- oriented activities with
MOVs
4 - Participated 4 civic-
oriented activities with

June May
2. Earned units or degree
in post graduate studies
MOVs
2% 3 - Participated 3 civic-
oriented activities with
MOVs
2 - Participated 2 civic-
oriented activity with MOVs
1 - Participated in only 1
civic- oriented activity with
MOVs

5 International/ National
level
20% 4 Regional level
KRA 4 Professional 3 Division level
Growth and June 10% 2 District level
1 School level
Development March
5 Doctoral Degree holder
4 earned units in Doctoral
Degree
3 Masteral Degree
2 CAR in Masteral Degree
June 10% 1 units in Masteral Degree
March

5 International level
4 National level
3 Regional level
2 Division level
1 School/ District level

Plus Factor A. Winning 5%

 Coach/
Awardee
Resource 5 perfect attendance
Speaker/ 4 1 -2 absences
3 3 -5 absences
Trainor
2 6 8 absences
Facilitator 1 9 or more absences
Curriculum
Writer 5 Action Research
replicated by other schools
B. 100% Daily 4 Implemented the Action
Attendance Research with MOVs
3 Approved Action
Research by the SDS/ ASDS
2 Submitted Action
Research Proposal to the
C. Action SDS/ ASDS
1 Proposed Action
Research
Research to the Immediate
Supervisor

5 3 or more chairmanship
school level
4 2 chairmanship school
level
3 1 chairmanship or 4 or
more membership school
level
2 active member in 3 or
more committee in school
D. level
Chairmanship 1 active member in 1 2
committee school level
 Overall Rating for 4.32
Accomplishments

EVA T. NOREGA, Ed D. RODERICK L. TIPOLO

Rater Ratee

____________________________________________
Approving Authority
LEGEND: SUMMARY OF POINTS EARNED
KRA 1
KRA 2
KRA 3
KRA 4
PLUS FACTOR
QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE RATING
TOTAL
RATING
4.5 5.0 90 100% OUTSTANDING DESCRIPTIVE RATING
3.5 4. 49 70 89% VERY SATISFACTORY
2.5 3.49 50 69% SATISFACTORY
1.5 2.49 30 49% UNSATISFACTORY
Below 1.49 29% and POOR
below