PLACE

STUDENT INFORMATION
LABEL HERE
Student Research Week 2017
Topic Judges Score Sheet for Oral Competitions Student did not attend

INSTRUCTIONS: DO NOT tabulate your scores; it will be done by the SRW Committee.
Please meet with the other session judge(s) to rank this students presentation (at the bottom of the page).
Needs Above
Average
Content: Improvement Average
The research has merit and makes a contribution to the field of study 1 2 3 4 5 6
The abstract accurately summarized the research presented 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
The introduction provided short, yet pertinent information about the project
The methodology/theoretical framework was appropriate for the research 1 2 3 4 5 6
presented methods of analysis or interpretation were utilized
Appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 6
The results/arguments/conclusions were detailed and explained accurately 1 2 3 4 5 6
The research was well discussed and presentation provided recommendations for 1 2 3 4 5 6
future research and/or practical applications or relevance
Presentation Delivery:
The presenter was comfortable presenting the topic and fielding questions 1 2 3 4 5 6
Students mannerisms (eye contact, gesture, posture and vocal expressiveness) 1 2 3 4 5 6
show enthusiasm and enhanced presentation delivery
Student clearly and accurately conveyed the information utilizing personal 1 2 3 4 5 6
knowledge of the subject and slides (if available)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Rate of speech and language is consistent, appropriate and not distracting
1 2 3 4 5 6
Student exuded poise and confidence, talked audibly and owned the presentation
Presentation Aids: Please fill out this section only if presentation aids are available
The slides/visual aids were accurately presented, easy to see, and complemented 1 2 3 4 5 6
students presentation
Information on the slides was well-organized, grammatically correct, and large 1 2 3 4 5 6
enough to be seen from anywhere in the room
All figures, charts, images, and graphs were properly presented and contained 1 2 3 4 5 6
relevant information to the topic
Presentation aids were designed with consistent color schemes, font sizes and 1 2 3 4 5 6
background

Based on all the presentations I viewed during this session, overall I would rank this presentation (circle one)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Not in the top 5

Referring to the guidelines provided, please indicate (tick yes/no) the award(s) you recommend this presentation for:
Award Name yes no Award Name yes no
Sigma Xi Symposium Theme Award Division of Student Affairs ACE Award

Sigma Xi Interdisciplinary Award Division of Student Affairs Higher Education Award

Texas Sea Grant Award Writing Center Special Award for Best Presentation

Melbern G. Glasscock Humanities Award Writing Center Special Award for Best Written Abstract

Vice President for Research- Excellence in

Research Award

PLEASE RETURN ALL FORMS TO THE JUDGES ROOM IN MSC 2401.