Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 84

At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish

Are Over with updates


http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/at-the-very-least-your-days-of-
eating-pacific-ocean-fish-are-over/

Opinion by Gary Stamper

The heart-breaking news from Fukushima just keeps getting worsea LOT
worseit is, quite simply, an out-of-control flow of death and destruction.
TEPCO is finally admitting that radiation has been leaking to the Pacific
Ocean all along. and its NOT over.

I find myself moving between the emotions of sorrow and anger.

It now appears that anywhere from 300 to possibly over 450 tons of
contaminated water that contains radioactive iodone, cesium, and
strontium-89 and 90, is flooding into the Pacific Ocean from the Fukushima
Daichi site everyday. To give you an idea of how bad that actually is,
Japanese experts estimate Fukushimas fallout at 20-30 times as high as
as the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombings in 1945

Theres a lot youre not being told. Oh, the information is out there, but you
have to dig pretty deep to find it, and you wont find it on the corporate-
owned evening news.

o An MSNBC article in April of 2012 reported that seals and polar


bears were found to have external maladies that consisted of
fur loss and open sores, obvious signs of radiation burns from
the Fukushima meltdown, despite the conclusions of the article.
o Fukushima radiation appears to be causing an epidemic of
dead and starving Sea Lions in California and the FDA has
refused to test for radiation
o Update: Huffington Post reports that the reactors used dirty
fuel, a combination of plutonium and uranium (MOX), which
means we can never return to this place again. This comes
from a Russian nuclear physicist who is an expert on the kinds
of gasses being released at Fukushima.
o .Almost a third more US West Coast newborns may face
thyroid problems after Fukushima nuclear disaster
o Contaminated water from Fukushima reactors could double
radioactivity levels of US coastal waters in 5 years We were
surprised at how quickly the tracer spread

above: German Scientists have calculated the dispersion of Cs-137 in the Pacific
Ocean

WHATS GOING ON WITH THE PACIFIC OCEAN FOOD CHAIN? May


2013 Researchers from the Japan Agency for Marine Earth Science and
Technology reported in early 2012 that they have detected radioactive
cesium from the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant in plankton collected from
all 10 points in the Pacific they checked, with the highest levels at around
25 degrees north latitude and 150 degrees west longitude. Plankton, and
the radiation they contain, moves right up the food chain through fish,
whales, seals, etc., and when larger fish eat smaller fish. Kyodo: Highest
levels of Fukushima contamination in plankton already east of Hawaii?

A WARNING TO SEAFOOD LOVERS EVERYWHERE Scientists


previously reported higher-than-expected concentrations of radiation in
fish off Japan. Now there are calls for testing of seafood sold in the U.S.
Although contaminated air, rainfall and even radioactive debris from
Japan have drifted toward the U.S. West Coast since the disaster
occurred 2 1/2 years ago, scientists are unclear about how the
contaminated waters could impact the health of Americans, and while
scientists say that 300 tons of contaminate water is diluted in the Pacific,
no one knows how long thats been going during those 2 1/2 years as we
also now know TEPCO has been lying all along. Nuclear experts are
calling on the U.S. government to test West Coast waters and Pacific
seafood sold in the U.S. in the wake of Japans alarming admission
about an ongoing radiation leak, something the EPA and the FDA have
so far refused to do, as they are only testing imported fish, not wild-
caught. WHY? The only way to protect your children and grandchildren is
by NOT EATING SEAFOOD from the Pacific Ocean until we have better
information. Source.Information posted at the website of heThe
Department of Nuclear Engineering at the University of California
recommends not buying any fish from the Pacific Ocean or western
states, including Baja.

WHAT YOU HAVENT BEEN TOLD ABOUT FISH CONTAMINATION

Tissue samples taken from 15 bluefin caught in August, five months


after the meltdowns at Fukushima Daiichi, all 15 contained reactor
byproducts cesium-134 and cesium-137.
The 15 fish tested were only exposed to radiation for a short time. But
bluefin arriving in California now will have been exposed to the
Fukushima radiation for much longer.
Unlike some other compounds, radioactive cesium does not quickly
sink to the sea bottom but remains dispersed in the water column,
from the surface to the ocean floor. Fish can swim right through it,
ingesting it through their gills, by taking in seawater or by eating
organisms that have already taken it in.
The overwhelming scientific consensus is that there is no safe level of
radiation and radiation consumed and taken into the body is much
more dangerous than background radiation.
The Telegraph notes that scientists tagged a bluefin tuna and found
that it crossed between Japan and the West Coast three times in 600
days: All Pacific migratory fish are likely Fukushima contaminated.
Why have Contaminated Alaskan Halibut been found even though
halibut dont migrate? The cesium-134 contamination from
radioactive plumes doesnt just fall on land.
Study shows Fukushima nuclear pollution becoming more
concentrated as it approaches U.S. West Coast Plume crosses
ocean in a nearly straight line toward N. America Appears to stay
together with little dispersion (MODEL)
Pacific herring in Canada bleeding from eyeballs, faces, fins, tails
Ive never seen fish looking this bad All 100 examined were bloody
Officials informed of hemorrhaging soon after 3/11 Govt
ignoring problem.
Unprecedented: Sockeye salmon at dire historic low on Canadas
Pacific coast We think something happened in the ocean The
elders have never seen anything like this at all Alaska and Russia
also affected.
Japan Times: Fukushima Daiichi radioactive water problems seem
uncontainable Believed to be wreaking environmental havoc upon
Pacific Ocean.
Reuters: Crisis deepening at Fukushima nuclear plant; Upgraded to
Level 3 Serious Incident Represents a 100-fold increase in
severity of a radiological release Tepco says highly radioactive
leakage continues, but unknown where from.
Its more than obvious that TEPCO officials have no idea what theyre
doing, and the big question is why arent world governments jumping
in to contain whats going on? Meanwhile, the Pacific Ocean may
very well be dying.

Australian Physician and anti-nuclear advocate Dr. Helen Caldicott


Warns of Contaminated Fish and Ocean

Japan Nuclear Crisis: The Dangers of Radiation

Also see this video of her speaking in 2012

Quotes from Dr Caldicott

Plumes of radioactivity from Fukushima are migrating in the Pacific


towards the U.S. West Coast.
[Chernobel]] is one of the most monstrous cover-ups in the history of
medicine
Then we extrapolate to japan. Japan is by orders of magnitude
many times worse than Chernobyl.
I knew the three GE engineers who helped design the GE Mark 1
reactors. They resigned because they knew they were dangerous.
Japan built them on an earthquake fault.
Diablo and San Onofre are both built on earthquake faults, havent
you seen enough of an earthquake to see what it doesand in a
tsunami area.

What is the greatest threat to humanity? We are, of course.and our


technology. Like a dangerous weapon in the hands of a child, technology
has overtaken our capacity to control potential consequences. Oxford
Universitys Future of Humanity Institute, led by director Nick Bostrom, says
we have entered this new kind of technological era that we have no track
record of surviving.

Our technological intelligence may have the potential for creating a better
world, but so far, in areas of the economy, genetics and biologics, arms
and warfare, security and surveillance, as well as the environment and
energy, technology is also completely indifferent to the law of unintended
consequences.

Fukushima is what happens when we have the moral responsibility of


infants and the technology of adults.

Update: August 16th, 2013

Its been an interesting 36 hours: This website went from 200-300 visitors a
day to 0ver 16,000 visitors yesterday and over 39,000 today (so far!). There
have also been more comments than any other post that has appeared
here, and honestly, the majority of them have been negative.

It started with the graphic that I posted. It turns out, unknowingly to me, that
it was an image from NOAA that showed the Tsunami wave height that had
been edited to look like the Pacific Ocean Fukushima radiation path. Im
going to look for updated information and will change the graphic and
accompanying information as soon as I have time to look for it.
Unfortunately, the gigantic jump in viewership crashed my site and Ive
been working on that since yesterday morning. Support and I finally figured
out what had happened and I have upgraded the site to handle the traffic.

The negative comments seem to be mostly from people who arent willing
to have a conversation, demanding that I take the article down, that its not
credible, that the information is garbage, and even with some resorting to
name calling and insults. I have left them all up. Even the one that says I
dont have dose counts. Well, if the FDA would actually do dose counts, we
might be able to know that, but since theyve refused to measure radiation,
we cant know.

We should just trust them when they tell us the radiation levels are safe
(levels that keep on changing), that GMOs are not harmful, that we dont
do do experiments on US citizens, that were not spying on the American
people, the economy is improving, and that we should live in fear of
terrorists. I ask, who are the real terrorists?

Support and I were concerned the the site crash was caused by a denial of
service attack, but after checking the access logs, we agreed it wasnt
likely, but not out of the question. I find it unbelievable one article could
cause that drastic of a jump in hits. Theres also been a significant number
of new members, non of whom are paying or making donations. Lets see if
it holds. I doubt it.

I believe the article is credible and that while reasonable people can
disagree, a lot of the negative comments a have a climate-denier feel to
them. How many years has that argument been going on? Most people are
going to believe what they want or have to believe. its not coming
through mainstream sources so it cant be true? Get real.

For those who say that if I dont take the article down, it clearly shows they
are not interested in facts, only in trashing the system, in case you havent
noticed, the system needs no help being trashedits perfectly capable of
doing that itself.

Meanwhile, heres some more fodder for the fodder cannons.

MSN: Nuclear experts call for testing U.S. West Coast waters and Pacific
seafood for Fukushima contamination I definitely recommend FDA and
EPA increase their vigilance

The Fukushima Nightmare Gets Worse

Water, Water Everywhere: Incentives and Options at #Fukushima Daiichi


and Beyond

Insight: After disaster, the deadliest part of Japans nuclear clean-up

Update: August 18th, 2013

The original map posted in the article that many pointed out was an edited
version of wave height has been replaced with a video simulation from this
article, can also be viewed on You Tube, and is originally from this
website. Thanks to sharp and informed readers for sending me links. One
commenter said that the simulation is sorely in need of updating as a result
of new information, but does not post a link.

Ill be responding to many of the comments and adding new information


and updates in tomorrows CIC Newsletter (issue #28, 4/19/2013), which
will be solely dedicated to the Fukushima disaster and its implications. If
youre not on my mailing list, you can get on here or pick it up off of my
Facebook page.

Update: August 21st, 2013

I have been accused of plagiarism and copyright violation from a source


website (see the accusation here ) in spite of the message on the website
that says, DUST OFF YOUR BLOGS AND GET ACTIVE AGAIN ABOUT
FUKUSHIMA! Share, like, tweet, flip out!.

As many of you know, CIC is a non-commercial and educational 501(c)3


organization. I stand by the use of the quotes from that website because I
feel that it falls within Fair Use parameters because we were acting in a
news reporting mode providing commentary for the purpose of informing
the public. Determination of whether copyright infringement has taken place
can ultimately only be decided in a federal court. In the meantime, the legal
department of my webhost, bluehost, has sent me an email stating that I
must remove the article within 48 hours or they will take my website down.
Ill be contacting my attorney next and then issue a statement to them
about fair use regulations. Heres why this falls under fair use:

I have not profited from the use (were a non-profit)


There is no commercial activity
There is no entertainment
There is no bad-faith behavior (Links to the original sections were
provided)
There is no denying credit to the quotes from the original author
The quotes were used for teaching
The quotes were used in a transformative use with an entirely
different summation

Meantime, I have removed every quote and every link from that website,
replacing them with other links and information that I believe do not affect
the article whatsoever. This new version will stay up at this point. Ill keep
you posted on any new developments.

Meanwhile, if youre one of dozens of websites that have reposted my


original article, you may freely repost this one with my permission, as even
though may work is also copyrighted, anyone is free to repost it with a
credit back to this website.
Update, Sept. 4th, 2013

Heres a see if you can stomach it video from Steven Starr, Director of the
Clinical Laboratory Science Program at the University of Missouri and is an
Associate member of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and has been
published by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. His writings appear on
the websites of PSR, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, the Moscow
Institute of Physics and Technology Center for Arms Control, Energy and
Environmental Studies, Scientists for Global Responsibility, and the
International Network of Scientists Against Proliferation. Since 2007, he
has worked with the governments of Switzerland, Chile, and New Zealand,
in support of their efforts at the United Nations to eliminate thousands of
high-alert, launch-ready nuclear weapons.

Those you who compare the amount of potassium in bananas to the


Fukushima release or who minimize the effects of the radiation really need
to see this.
293 Responses to At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over with
updates

1. Josh Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 2:35 am

The above picture of radiation is actually an edited version of a NOAA wave height
map. Notice how it doesnt have a map legend to tell you what the colors are, not does it
have a title. This is misinformation right here.

2. Gary Stamper Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 3:36 am

I just checked and apparently, youre correct Josh. Heres what appears to be the latest
map I could find showing radiation in the Pacific up UNTIL March 2012. If the tsunami
hit in May of 2011, and this map represents what happened over a span of 10 months,
what do you suppose an updated map to August 2013 17 months later might look like?
I think Ill stand by the representation shown in the article.

3. diane2532342323 Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 6:07 am

Dont consume anything made in the US? That aint gonna happen. Lets be realistic!
4. Gary Stamper Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 10:46 am

I think youve misread the article, Diane. No where does it say not consume anything
made in the USit does say not to consume wild-caught Pacific Ocean fish. And then
theres coretex in the Gulf of Mexico. As I said.our own worst enemy.

5. anthony Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 11:55 am

Panic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not

6. Someone Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 5:37 pm

The wave map does have a legend right on top of south america, but yes, it is a map of
the tsunami wave height, NOT radiation. Itd be nice if these reporters would find an
accurate map and switch them out.

7. Juan Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 6:53 pm

@Josh the legend is on the right

8. GDawg Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 7:27 pm

OMG this is pseudo-science hyperventilation at its worst. Well, Ive seen worse, but
this is close. As always, its a lot easier to jump up and down about something (the sky
is falling, the sky is falling!) than to think carefully about the meaning of observations
who cares where the Fukushima radioactivity goes? whats important is HOW MUCH
goes (i.e, dose) and its fate

Tuna all over the world (and everything else) has 14C from 1950s bomb tests in it, and
people have been gobbling it up, but the dose is so low that it is statistically not visible.
Except for very nearshore Japanese waters, the same is true with respect to Fukushima
radiation.

There is simply no evidence whatever to support the wild claims Stamper is making.
Even for Japanese people the risks of elevated cancers are very low, in spite of all that
radioactivity. Arm-waving about marine mammals, fish, babies in Cali, etc., is just plain
silly.
But have at it Chicken Little use your platform and see what kind of attention you can
get.

9. rudy Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 7:48 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4CBQO6DnBY
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-lat-austria-1-research-map-
html,0,7400210.htmlpage

10. Gary Stamper Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 7:58 pm

GDawgNo evidence? Youre kidding, right?


http://elitedaily.com/news/world/breaking-news-fukushima-radiation-affecting-
americans-and-theres-no-way-to-stop-it/

11. Yon Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 8:10 pm

Most disturbing I am certain to all of us. The solution in regards to food production, like
fish, is to establish facilities to produce these items that is not linked to the ocean. We are
all aware of fish farming techniques however, non reach the intent of the Aqua=Terra
T.W.I.N.S. (Trans-Web Infrastructure Network System) projects
(www.aquaterraplanetaryholdings.us and http://www.invention.net/aquaterra). This is an
idea to build a self-sustaining national and international single-standard system for
advanced (350-4,000+ mph) transportation system, power-grid system, and self-
sustaining land (Terra) and sea (Aqua) Stations producing food, fish, water, advanced and
emergency shelter, and much more. In truth, this is one solution to the contamination
caused by our selfish Human behavior and to resolve, we must build a self-sustaining
system as the Aqua=Terra T.W.I.N.S.proposes.

12. willem Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 8:29 pm

just buy a geigerteller and check your goods on radioactivity

13. Tony Plakas Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 8:43 pm

Notice the legend is for centimeters. This is a map of tsunami wave height.
14. mx Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 9:09 pm

quit fighting.

15. mx Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 9:12 pm

please remove this misleading map which clearly states a unit of cm in the legend,
referring to wave height, which has nothing to do with the spread of radiation

16. Glen Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 9:38 pm

This story is not credible. It begins with trying to pass off a map of wave height as if it
was a map of radiation. Even if that was somehow an oversight (hard to believe) it shows
a shocking inattention to detail. Then there is the statement that Contaminated water
from Fukushima reactors could double radioactivity levels of US coastal waters in 5
years. Excuse me, how radioactive is the water now? So how radioactive is double that?

The elitedaily story is just as bad. Same hysterical nonsense about the amount of
contaminated water leaking into the Pacific Ocean, but not a word about how much
actual radiation.

17. David Otness Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 9:52 pm

Writing from Alaska and being a lifelong commercial fisherman and merchant mariner in
northern waters (now retired) Ill ask for some substantiation on that halibut quote.
In fact, there has been so much speculation and even fear mongering such as the above
rolled-out graphic over the past two years. That said, I am not saying we dont have an
issue as large and as immediate as catastrophic climate change, likely one that will hasten
the end of life as we knew it.
I am not downplaying the seriousness of Fuk but the volumes of water in the Pacific
Ocean are ENORMOUS and even 600tons per day needs to be broken down into units
such as gallons/cubic volumes and last but not least, the actual levels of the
contamination within these volumes.
I still have questions regarding the seals which had lesions as I was on the Arctic Ocean
doing research when that was reported. Those seals, if indeed proven irradiated (which
they have not), could likely have picked it up from Soviet era leaking submarine reactor
cores on the northern Siberian coast rather than having a severe dose all the way from
northern Japan. Check the ocean currents, they flow west from Alaska.
We never did get the answers there on the seals and that disturbs me, however I have not
heard of any polar bears getting similar afflictions. Starvation and drowning continue to
bedevil them as the ice fades away.
There have been no further or recent reports of those sick seals and I get my news from
both the research community and Alaskan sources.
I have many Inupiat and Yupik friends on FaceBook and they are not reporting any
ongoing anomalies, in fact they are telling of great meals even yesterday.
My fish come from the northern Gulf of Alaska waters and my freezer id\s full and the
fish are tasty as ever.
Call me a fool if you wish, but Im a well-fed fool at that and quite selective about what I
eat.
I worry most about the stored plutonium at those sites.
That is the SHIT that will take us and most creatures out. out
Cheers

18. GDawg Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 9:56 pm

Stamper: Please, evidence? what youre presenting is a joke. okay, maybe I should
have been more clear: there is no credible scientific evidence supporting any of your wild
claims or the sky is falling hyperbole.

If you choose to suspend rationale thought and reason, then you can turn anything you
want into evidence to support any claim you want. For example, just as your maps
shows nothing about Fukushima radiation, the URL you provide proves zero about
radaition impacts, zero, nadda. To repeat, its dose that counts (a little more complicated
than that, but still its the factor thats critical).

So wheres your dose map? Wheres your dose-response story?

Your evidence isnt science. Its little more than squawking. But squawk on CL,
squawk on

19. Lisa Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 10:18 pm

For those that dont believe

http://www.naturalnews.com/041610_Fukushima_radioactive_leak_state_of_emergency.
html

20. A Ryan Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 10:54 pm

I agree on the map issue-casts doubt on the article.


21. Laurie Says:
August 15th, 2013 at 10:55 pm

Gary Stamper, even the latest map of radiation in the Pacific is not what you say it is.
Heres the site with that map: http://asrltd.com/japan/plume.php

and please note the words below it, from ASR: THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION
OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION. This is a representation only
of where some of the marine life off the coast of Japan MAY have travelled since
Fukushima. The authors make no assumption that that marine life was exposed to
excessive levels of radioactivity.

Heres another link with some info, although I cant vouch for its accuracy:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-10/fukushima-radiation-proves-less-deadly-
than-feared.html

Enough with the Chicken Little routine. Anyone can sound alarms and cause panic with
misinformation, and misrepresenting what these two maps show is the worst of the worst.
Id suggest doing better research, if you really want to do a public service. There is
absolutely no science to support this article, and no excuse for making the broad
statements you do.

22. Laurie Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 11:00 pm

Scientists say the only safe amount of radioactivity is zero? Really? Good luck if you
want to eat anything thats every been exposed to sunlight. Or exposed to water thats
been exposed to sunlight.

23. Any good plan Says:


August 15th, 2013 at 11:57 pm

Why not flood the plant with concrete and then water.

24. A Real Scientist Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 1:41 am

I cant stand this mish-mash of data, a misleading graphic, and baseless fear mongering.
Theres no evidence the fish caught in the Pacific have become radioactive as a result of
Fukishima.
25. B Says:
August 16th, 2013 at 2:42 am

Laurie- You confuse electromagnetic radiation with atomic radiation Atomic radiation,
which is subatomic particles being emitted from radioactive matter at very high velocities,
is intensely more destructive than UV radiation from the sun, which is an electromagnetic
wave and very weak by comparison, and does not pollute water in fact, UV radiation
sterilizes water (but cant destroy radioactive contamination.)

26. angela Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 2:42 am

Not only is this atrocity been a class A worlds worst blunder.. followed by lying to their
staff to go repair everything to die a terrible death. Now the ocean and marine life is
dying. I say if clean up is possible then get on it already. Its not a matter of dollars and
cents.. or Yen.. It is the environment in which your children and grand children will live
in (or die in in this case??). So Step up to the plate and clean it up already!

27. B Says:
August 16th, 2013 at 2:48 am

Any good plan- Flooding the plant with anything would only displace the contaminated
water, forcing it out of the resevoirs that are supposed to be containing it in the first place
even faster than leaving it alone. Containment is the only viable approach.

28. Julie Clarity Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 3:20 am

This is the sort of thing that forces a body to adapt or die.

29. Tom Burke Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 4:49 am

This guy heads up the article with a graphic of wave height which anyone reading the
article would assume is some measure of radiation. He gets called on it and then says he
stands behind the fraudulent graphic because a real graph of radiation might look like this.
So, is anything else in the article correct or are all the statement he makes what the truth
might look like, possibly, maybe,

30. Rob-old sailor Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 5:06 am
Yes,and everyone who eats carrots will die.

31. Laurie Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 5:51 am

B: thank you for the clarification.

32. Roger Skoff Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 6:36 am

After reading the article and the comments on it, Im really proud of what I saw.
Although the article is at best an environmentalist polemic, the people responding to it
have been generally thoughtful, courteous and knowledgeable. Good. C. M. Kornbluth
isnt right yet and, if we keep it up, The Marching Morons may never get here at all.
Celebrate! Eat fish! Kick a tree!

33. me Says:
August 16th, 2013 at 8:14 am

its sad that the map is what steals the whole story. The map is suppose to be an example
of how the radiation will spread. i believe its true that radiation is in the waters. however i
believe if it were harmful to humans then it would be taken care of.Its sad that it will go
untreated till then.

34. asus3000 Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 9:28 am

For all those saying there is no credible news source and that its all just hyperbole. The
300 tons of seawater contamination is coming from this source:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-12/fukushima-plant-workers-raise-safety-
concerns/4879960

35. asus3000 Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 9:41 am

Another article corroborates the 300 tons per day number:


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-08/300-tonnes-of-radioactive-water-leaking-from-
fukushima-into-pac/4872482

36. John Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 9:59 am
This article is an opinion piece. I read the other articles quoted and those are opinion
pieces as well. So sorry to burst anyones bubble, but overall, this is BS.

37. knowfishbluefish Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 11:26 am

I sold my seafood wholesale business in Boston in 2001. For 15 years in that business I
always marveled at the giant cancer tumors in Pacific caught Swordfish. It was a rarity to
find cancer in Atlantic caught Swordfish. I was just now surprised to not find an
immediate link when searching cancer rates in the fisheries. I dont want to scare you, not
all these fish had them, but plenty did. When I was digging them out from the collar or
along the spine cartilage, Id just think of all the testing in the atolls. We finally really
did it.
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!

38. Dali Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 1:16 pm

Gary, the article would be good if you would not made it up.
When I find out the map is tsunami height, I felt shame how I could share on FB
something like that. It could be a good beginning, but you better start again.

39. Vic Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 3:52 pm

Glow in the dark ocean for night swimming! AWESOME!!!!!!

40. MR AIDAN G WALSH Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 5:10 pm

I will say this clearly now, do not give up your firearms, the disaster at Japan was a
nuclear weapon devicewake up people and take this and previous radiation disasters
kept quiet controlled media very very seriouslyI have internal ionization radiation
injuries and I first started showing symptoms back in Montreal June 1990U R all
going to now come down with radiation injuries it cannot be stopped now it is in your
entire food chains, water supplies and even in your rain drops, next it will be in your
tearsI am very very serious about what I write and say onlineAll Gulf War Veterans
will succumb to this plus their entire families, Doctors will say I think you have Chronic
Lyme Disease or another b.s. story of Cronic Fatigue Syndrome but in the end I will tell
you now so you do not have to waste your time and funds looking for a proper
diagnosisit will be RADIATION INJURIESthey lied about 3 Mile Island they lied
about Japan they lied about Chernobyl they lied about the over 2,000 atomic nuclear
bomb explosions and the even lied France about The Marshall Islands as wellI
suggest 2 things now 1. Read the Radiation Pagefrom The National CFIDS Foundation
a possible chance of a cure coming the best minds in medicine now involvedand donate
if you can please,(THANKS) stop giving these corrupt controlled Governments your tax
monies donate now 2. under no circumstances do not give up your firearms but go out
and stockpile more arms nowThey do not give a shit whatsoever about any of you they
have left us to slowly die now for decades!! 21ST CENTURY MEDICAL
INTENTIONAL DISASTER COVER-UP!! THE BLOOD/ORGAN SUPPLY UNSAFE
PLUS THEY ARE NOW USING VACCINES TO IMMUNO SUPRESS YOU AND
YOUR DOCTORS/NURSES DO NOT EVEN KNOW THISTHANKS AIDAN
BLESSES TO ALL OF YOU AND PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN NOW*KEEP
YOUR GUNS

41. James Oppenheimer Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 5:32 pm

This article uses garbage information, as has been restated numerous times in the
comments. If the originators do not take this down, it clearly shows they are not
interested in facts, only in trashing the system.

Shame.

42. Steve Collins Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 7:32 pm

Nobody is disputing that tons of contaminated water is flowing beneath the damaged
nuclear plant. But there doesnt appear to be any scientific evidence in the entire piece to
back up anything that is asserted. Its propaganda, sure, but that would be fine if it was
citing genuine sources and verifiable facts. Instead, its just tossing out claims that dont
appear to be have any substance to them. To be generous, its shoddy. And the
misleading graphic makes it downright terrible.

43. Miska Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 7:48 pm

Water is an excellent insulator against radioactivity. Radioactive water does not exist,
only areas polluted by radioactive waiste. This article is a joke for anybody who has read
any physics.

44. Kristin Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 9:31 pm

This is predicted in the biblesad to say we will not like the outcome This is what I
read when I see things like this and I get fearful.
Whoever dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty.
2 I will say of the Lord, He is my refuge and my fortress,
my God, in whom I trust.

3 Surely he will save you


from the fowlers snare
and from the deadly pestilence.

4 He will cover you with his feathers,and under his wings you will find refuge; his
faithfulness will be your shield and rampart.

5 You will not fear the terror of night,nor the arrow that flies by day.

6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness,nor the plague that destroys at midday.

7 A thousand may fall at your side,


ten thousand at your right hand,
but it will not come near you.

8 You will only observe with your eyesand see the punishment of the wicked.

9 If you say, The Lord is my refuge,and you make the Most High your dwelling,

10 no harm will overtake you,


no disaster will come near your tent.

11 For he will command his angels concerning you to guard you in all your ways;

12 they will lift you up in their hands,so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.

13 You will tread on the lion and the cobra;you will trample the great lion and the serpent.

14 Because he loves me, says the Lord, I will rescue him; I will protect him, for he
acknowledges my name.

15 He will call on me, and I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble,I will deliver
him and honor him.

16 With long life I will satisfy him

45. Trevor Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 9:44 pm

Mr. Stamper, you clearly WANT this issue to be as sensational and scary as possible.
Why else would you post that wave height map as a radiation map without being
absolutely certain about what it was? Why else would you not take that map down the
moment you found it to be incorrect? For this reason I cant trust a word you say.

46. kyler Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 10:33 pm

I think you are a bit too biased in your article:

For example:

Scientists say the only safe level of radiation is zero. YET, governments set limits for
radiation in food well above zero.

It is my understanding that there low levels of radiation in every city, and that includes
radiation in our food resulting from it being in cities. a Zero level does not exist. If it does,
id love to see a source on it. People need to read more articles that are written by experts
and not opinionated people. As a result people believe a lot of bullshit pretty quickly.

I do generally agree with the other stuff youve written.

47. Jim Kayalar Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 10:40 pm

Thank you for this article.THIS IS A GREAT ARTICLE! I am well hearsed in academia
and can see that some of the data is flawed.But, the truth remains that the Fuki plant
operators and the Japanese government covered this up and downplayed the dangers.
They still are. Thats exactly what happened in Chernobyl. Two decades post Chernobyl I
was asked if I had had radiation exposure at a routine checkup. I was 2500 miles away
from Cherynobyl. The Fuki disaster continues unabated. Cooling with sea water was just
a temporary fix. They are now debating dumping all the water in the storage tanks into
the sea because there is no place left to store the radioactive water.

48. Laura Says:


August 16th, 2013 at 11:11 pm

I have been avoiding swimming at the beach in Cali for this very reason. Its a known fact
that the radiation is not controlled and is leaking. And thats what they do tell you. Despite
the inaccuracy of the picture, we should all be learning from this that nuclear power is not
the answer. The plants in San Diego should be shut down. And liquids can be radioactive
including water!!!

49. John Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 12:25 am
The Earth itself is naturally radioactive, thats why we have volcanoes and hot springs.
Any food you eat that has potassium has radioactive potassium in it. Maybe Gary should
also advocate boycotting bananas.

And 450 tons of water actually isnt that much, water is really heavy. It works out to a
cube of water about 25 feet per side. Stick that into the ocean, and its nothing.

50. Ethan Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 12:43 am

TAKE THE PHOTO DOWN! If you can update your article, you can take the photo
down. It hurts the credibility of the article and the info it provides. TAKE IT DOWN
NOW!

51. He-man Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 1:04 am

450 tons is nothing 450 tons equates to 14,289 Gallons. An olympic size swimming
pool is about 660,000 gallons. In tons thats 20784 tons. Thanks for this shit article

52. Tony C. Saladino-Director ECO-Tours of Wisconsin Inc. Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 1:16 am

I have studied radiation and the processes required to start up a nuke facility, the ties
between peaceful uses of nuclear power and the weaponized stream of hot materials.
Nothing you said is unexpected, but the image used is perhaps misleading. The currents
and weather patterns sweep more of a Northward arc across the Pacific. In either case,
whether it hits South America or North America first is of little consequence. Those who
are not irate, demoralized or depressed about this long term terrorism created by the
ruling elites are just not paying attention. When you get a better graphic, I would like to
share your article on The Otherfish Wrap at blogspot.com I have been writing on this and
other issues for several years and devoted several posts to the Fukushima disaster and the
long term health affects that can be expected from such a wanton disregard for human
and environmental health.

53. Pam Pfeifer Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 2:41 am

Starvation could be the cause of the end of the world.

54. DragonTat2 Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:49 am
Thank you. This is vital information, despite the error in the image.
People are dying~

55. KT Says:
August 17th, 2013 at 5:05 am

If the map is wrong, then please take it down and put a map up that is right. The only map
that I trust right now is radiation map that is crowd sourced in Japan.
http://www.safecast.org

There is no good map of radiation for an area as large as the Pacific Ocean. You have to
depend on computer simulation for debris spread. Here is one:

http://jeromiewilliams.com/2013/07/29/holy-fukushima-is-your-drinking-water-safe-
from-japanese-radiation/

and here is another one.

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/05/does-radiation-travel-across-the-sea/

56. Carlos Ortega Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 6:43 am

Just watched V is for Vendetta for the first time, just yesterday, august 16th, 2013. It
seemed fitting. Its time for the world population to wake up and tell governments that is
time to serve and protect the people they serve, instead of send them (us) to wars, to
induced economic crises, to eat GMO poisoned food and so much more.

57. Gale Steelman Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 6:58 am

I WOULD listen to Dr. Caldicott, though, shes been studying the effects of radiation for
years and years. She has a lot of information that people should take the time to look into.

58. deebs Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 7:13 am

are the naysayers willfuly ignorant or propagandists? honestly, i dont see how any
argument against this reality can be considered anything but IGNORANT (which is to
ignore). it is impossible to get good graphics when radiation monitoring has been
censored. we find ourselves int the orwellian age of the doublespeakers and anti-
informationist media saboteurs. but graphics or not, the truth is, NO AMMOUNT OF
NUCLEAR RADIATION IS SAFE. period.
59. Big Jim Jr Says:
August 17th, 2013 at 7:29 am

Interesting article. Not exactly correct but still has valid points. But you should know
some things first.

Miska is correct. There is no such thing as radioactive water. Radiation pollution comes
from radioactive particles as you correctly stated. These particles are exactly that, tiny
particles. They are released any time a nuclear or xray release happens. There are many
types of particles, some worse than others.

The most important thing to know is these particles are heavy. That means they sink
whenever released. Whether it be in air or water. Hence the term nuclear fallout. The
particles can be spread by many means. Wind, carriers like people walking through
contaminated areas, water flows etc. But the particles always sink.

That means that in water, all radiation sinks to the bottom. Leaving the water
uncontaminated but not the bottom of the container. That could be the tank, barrel or the
ocean bottom. Currents will carry the particles only as far as it takes them to sink to the
bottom.

At that point, only disturbing the bottom will continue to spread the particles. That
disturbing can be a storm, fish, bottom dwelling critters etc. But the particles will only go
far enough to sink back down.

Now, as these particles move across the bottom, sooner or later they fall into deep holes,
trenches, valleys etc. Where little life exists and currents are mild. As the radiation sits, it
becomes covered up in silt, slowing being buried where they no longer move. At that
point the only danger they pose is to digging into the silt.

So the radioactive particles will never reach the US.

But, there is a possibility that fish and shellfish that pick up the particles in Japan, would
carry them to the US. That is why the feds are only testing imported fish.

On long migrating fish like tuna, they have to eat something containing the particles. So
unless they are eating crabs or other fish that eat bottom dwellers, the radiation stays put.
As more fish eat particles and carry them, sooner or later they die and the particles sink
again. Unless we catch them and eat them.

Think about the atomic bombs tests of the 40s-60s on Pacific Atolls. Only the area
around the atolls, the bottom, are radioactive. Otherwise we would all be so contaminated
that we would have six eyes, three fingers etc.

I wouldnt worry about eating US products. I would worry about eating Japanese
products. Just like I worry about eating ANYTHING from overseas.
60. lindsay Says:
August 17th, 2013 at 7:50 am

Ok seriously people! You are in a very serious state of denial if you say that this is all lies
and we are over reacting. Do the math 300 tons of nuclear run off has leaked into the
ocean everyday for 17 months! Approximately 145,000 tons in total. Thousands of fish
are washing up on shores dead. Just like the first wave of victims from trinobyl. And we
are going to keep consuming these contaminated fish. FDA says its safe so it must be.
They would never lie to us about what we are eating. Surely they would tell us if the food
we eat will give us cancer or cause our children to have develope mental disorders, or
cause future children to be born with terrible deformities. And remember GMO is good
for you too. merica the home of the brave. Just remember its a fine line between bravery
and stupidity.

61. Terry Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 8:09 am

1 in 2.5 men and 1 in 2.6 women now get cancer. False flag operations Cameras
everywhere. Bank bailouts? Everything is going to hell in a handbag and still you cannot
get your educated heads around what is going on? What are you doubters going to say
when you get cancer? In less than, what is it, 200 years we have managed to pretty much
guaranty our extinction. Not only that we need to make sure and take out ALL life when
we go. Im thinking that with high intelligence comes arrogance to match. I call it mental
illness, and we the people let these people rule over us? Because they have more colored
paper than we do? it all goes together and it spells certain death. Slow and painful. I have
no faith in any government. They have no honesty and have sold us like cattle at an
auction for pennies on the dollar. It all has to stop now. But is it too late? I guess by the
time we realize that racism and other tactics they use to keep us from getting together
and putting a stop to this utterly useless stupid self destructive one way ticket to hell, it
will be too late!!! If its not already. I for one am wondering how we are going to get
ourselves out of this mess. I guess well have to die. Call me what you want I dont need
the fine details to see where this is going to end up.

62. Terry Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 8:23 am

Mr. Aiden G Walsh I believe you hit the nail on the head!!!!! I have a hard time to get out
of bed some days and I never went to war, or even near where one was being fought.
They came and took my guns and I almost went to jail. Ill get more and hide the damned
things till the day when I need them to defend my family. Im becoming a prepper
slowly . Got a long way to go before I feel ready but when the shit hits the fan I want to
one of the first to start taking these bastards out. Thank you for your words. I wish I knew
afew billion more like you. Then we could set them straight!!! Do or die. Ill die, but first
I want to take some of these assholes with me.
63. John Eriksson Says:
August 17th, 2013 at 8:28 am

Compare this to the rubber duckies that was lost in the pacific 20 years ago. Its like a map
drawing the currents from fukushima.

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/what-can-28000-rubber-
duckies-lost-at-sea-teach-us-about-

64. Terry Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 8:35 am

I cant help it but I have to say it. Some guy on here says that this is an opinion piece?
Get your head out of your ass and look around my friend. is the rate of people dying of
cancer also just an opinion? Well, its my opinion that everybody needs to WAKE THE
HELL UP! You too dude. To the lady with the bible? That book isnt going to save you,
or anybody else. Too bad but we all are going to have to roll up our sleeves and get dirty!

65. AK Says:
August 17th, 2013 at 8:59 am

Great piece Gary, but please cite where you actually got main chunks of the articles
content.
The sections IS THE PACIFIC OCEAN FOOD CHAIN DOOMED?,'SEAFOOD
LOVERS ACROSS THE WORLD and KEYPOINTS ABOUT FISH
CONTAMINATION are taken from a webpage at NuclearCrimes.org.

66. Crickett Green Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 10:30 am

Well my research vessel is getting ready to head out into the Pacific Ocean and once and
for all find the answers. Time for everyone to put up some funds to help the expedition.
We will be taking water samples, tissue samples from marine life, and doing complete
radioactivity scans of the major portion of the northern Pacific, then swinging down the
west coast of the Americas. We will get the answers. Our findings will be double checked
by two University labs. The results will be posted on our site and the video of the entire
voyage will be available on You Tube. For more info go to my website
http://spectresquad.wix.com/sea-ghost-rescue-

67. hueman Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 12:16 pm
Well, thatll keep Mr Burns and Smithers happy down in Springfield Theyll be having
plenty more of them 3 eyed fish for dinner in the future!

68. Tom Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 1:57 pm

Do we think that the contaminated water in the Pacific will ONLY stay in the Pacific?

69. Tony from Vancouver Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 2:50 pm

Keep up the good work. You are on the right path and we know from the negative
comments Me thinks he does protest too much

I have said for 2 years, when the first 2 headed salmon shows up in the Fraser River(one
of the largest salmon rivers in the world) then perhaps people will go oh.

God;s speed all

70. Cecile Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:28 pm

The substance of this article is solid. There may be detail-problems: use of the tsunami
wave map, and the statistic that 1/3 of babies born after fkuushima show thyroid
involvement. The original statistic came from Joe Mangano & Janet Sherman,
epidemiologists: an increase of 35% in infant mortality on western coast united states
(plus Boise).
For full background see Devils Tango: How I Learned the Fukushma Step by Step,
revised edition, published by WingsPress.com. From its inception, DEvils Tango points
to the real magnitude of this planetary catastrophy.

71. runningman55 Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:44 pm

In AU this has been all over the main stream media for weeks. Came back to the states
and can find very little here. There is a lot of good evidence to back this up.

72. John Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:51 pm

You do realize that when you put false information up about radiation that people get
scared and do stupid things like overdose on iodine tablets right? Do you feel comfortable
knowing what you know now about this article you wrote? There are so many lies and
false information in it that I can only guess you are intentionally trying to hurt people.

73. Erin Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:55 pm

Fuku was a nuclear bomb and so was the earthquake.

See www. Jimstonefreelance.com.. for proof.

74. Jim Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:56 pm

Reminds me of the Dawn of the Dead remake press conference. Serious stuff.

75. Jerry C Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 3:57 pm

For those who simply want to split hairs on all the details or the validity of the
information presented in this article itself and youre hell bent for leather to keep right on
eating the stuff that comes out of the Pacific or the gulf, or from the shores of Japan go
for it please feel free to indulge yourselves enjoy the moment Ill just sit back and
smile.

76. lollerskate Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 4:04 pm

Its a shame the internet can be used for this.. The good news is people that write these
types of articles, or support those that do, are all talk and never actually do anything. So
at worst theyre just clutter, not a real threat to progress.

77. Catfish Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 4:12 pm

I remember a few months after this happend, I would google rad levels in rain for my
home st and other, I found 400-800% higher than normal, sounds like a huge amount but
realize its 4-8 times higher, nothing to scoff at in any case

78. V Says:
August 17th, 2013 at 4:23 pm
At the very least, the dates of the video so not match the article says the video was on
March 22, 2012, and the video itself is from March 18, 2011. The disaster was on March
11, 2011.a bit of a disconnect.

79. Pacific Sea Food Warning Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 4:30 pm

[...] GA_googleFillSlot("TaurusArmed-300P"); Something to consider when looking for


fish. I put Gulf of Mexico sea food on the "once in a blue moon" list due to the
Corexit/oil cocktail in the water column, and Pacific sea food is on the "Heck to the
Naw!" list. At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over [...]

80. Joe Barry Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 4:55 pm

Cowah Bunga dude; the surface is rad in California.

81. Thomas Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 6:25 pm

Hah. I think currently, something like 50% of Japanese men are smokers, some of the
highest smoking rates in the world, and also, one of the highest longevity rates in the
world too until Fukushima that is. But like all things in this world mean to deceive
and mislead and also in order to get out of assuming financial responsibilities I am
certain UN, WHO, etc. will send in the Anti-Smoking Industry to distort facts, come up
with junk statistics, call it truth and thus prove that the upsurge in Japanese deaths
from Fukushima are not really from radiation, not at all but BECAUSE OF THE
SMOKERS of course! And to make matters lovely everyone in the MSM and
mainstream thought, throughout the world, will oh-so-believe-it too! And nobody will
question it not now, not ever. First hand, second hand, third hand, fourth hand tobacco
smoke- THATs whats causing all those deaths and time to tighten up brutality and
tyranny against them smokers better to get everyone to oh-so-believe that, than
understand radiation release into the atmosphere since the 1940s and now into the oceans
thanks to Fukushima.

82. VickyinSD Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 6:27 pm

Despite the misleading graphic, the video says it all WAKE UP and PAY
ATTENTION people!

This is from an article posted on a Canadian news site yesterday


On Aug. 14, Reuters reported that Tepco was preparing to remove 400 tonnes of highly
irradiated spent fuel from the severely damaged Reactor Four building.

The operation, set to start in November and expected to take one year, has never been
attempted on this scale and, according to nuclear experts, is fraught with danger,
including the possibility of a large release of radiation if a fuel assembly breaks, gets
stuck or gets too close to an adjacent bundle, the news agency reported.

The radiation contained in the fuel pools in Reactor Four is equivalent to 14,000 times the
amount released in the atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima 68 years ago, the Reuters report
said.

In their World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013, independent scientists Mycle
Schneider and Antony Froggat wrote: Full release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool,
without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological
disaster to date.

http://www.coastreporter.net/article/20130816/SECHELT0302/308169974/-
1/sechelt/nuclear-crisis-reaching-critical-stage

83. laura m. Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 6:46 pm

Fish farming is the answer in certain parts of the world incl. most of the U.S. Seafood is
unfit to eat even in Gulf Mex. for decades, as gulf is contaminated with chemical run off
and raw sewage from the Miss. river and coastal cities down to Key west. I eat Atlantic
salmon and N. sea haddock, etc.but no more shellfish. In the 60s up to the early 80s I ate
shrimp, oysters, etc. from the gulf; no longer safe.

84. Chavez Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 7:20 pm

Wowsome comments here are incredibly shallow. This a disaster that need attention by
the POTUS. It is the arms industry backing nuclear energy. We should immediately close
all of our nuclear power plants and safely dismantle them. If any elected official says that
we should support nuclear energy, that should be one litmus test to vote them out. In due
time it will happen here or elsewhere.

85. ding Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 8:13 pm

Ahh The FDA is not the only one who can officially test the dead dolphins for
radiation.
This info/article is mis-leading on that point, to create a headline hysteria.

Stop this crap and do some of your own leg work and research on this before you print.

86. Hans Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 8:26 pm

What about the french nuke testing at mururoa atoll??? they let bombs off actually in the
waterthat was years ago.

87. River Rat Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 8:36 pm

http://www.infiniteunknown.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/US-NRC-Japan-Fallout-
Map-From-Destroyed-Fukushima-Daiichi-Nuclear-Plant.jpg

88. Jeff Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 9:19 pm

Im amazed half these commenters could pass the math question in order to comment.

89. Benjamin Chung Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 10:03 pm

The only completely safe and right thing to do is 1.) Outlaw nuclear energy power plants
in the USA and around the world.-The world doesnt need any more Chernobyls, Three
Mile Islands, and Fukushimas to contaminate and destroy the genetic heritage of life on
the earth. 2.) Hold the people accountable who pushed this cancer causing death inducing,
environment polluting hateful wasteful and ugly technology , hold them accountable and
let them know they were wrong to exchange life for greedy profit. 3.) Stay alert and trust
God and fight the good fight against corruption, environmentally degrading unethical
businesses around the world, against bureuacratic corruption and corrupt governmental
groups hiding behind institutions like wolves in sheeps clothing(the worst kind of them
all).Remember Charleston Heston, remember all men are created equal and endowed
by the creator with certain inalienable rights and among those rights are the right to life,
to liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This is the only basis for US government and too
much of the basics is being stifled and silenced! be informed and do the right thing and
stand up for what is right! We owe it to the future generations.

You see what many people fail to understand; and in doing so they are betraying their
very own selves(to thine own self be true); is that the environment is a global one. That
destruction to nature anywhere will find its way into everywhere else( weather changes,
pollution, polluting technology, industrial wastes, etc.) So whenever we accept pollution
and unethical behavior anywhere we are indirectly at the very least contributing to the
disaster that is now killing us. Fukushima is another prime example of this. Wake up!
Trust in Jesus who has overcome the world! Even death gets destroyed by God in the end!
Dont be one of those who decided it was okay to kill innocents and to pollute the world!

90. Naj Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 10:11 pm

@He-man

Both of your conversions are grossly incorrect, a magnitude of order off.

91. Rmf Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 10:57 pm

Despite the map mistake, I think the general tone of alarm is valid. The scary thing is that
the Japanese authorities and media are saying almost nothing about the possibility of
cesium-tainted seafood. Japanese friends continue to post photos of seafood dinners that
they and their children are eating. The only neutral thought I have is that maybe the
Greater Intelligence that imbues the Universe is clearing out the human race for some
future species to thrive. Our out-of-balance with Nature stupidity is merely a tool in the
process. As the late great George Carlin said, The Earth will be fine folks. But youre
going away. Time to pack your bags.

92. Nosson Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 11:09 pm

Wow so many of you rushing to stick your heads in the ground like an ostrich the map is
wrong oh well they had a bad graphic designer for the page. But the science is real.and
all of the comments including swearing.Why? This is simply a very real warning about
the future of all of our children.if you cannot understand the damage that Radioactive
isotopes pose feel free to ingest some .Then i wont have to read the nonsense you
naysayers are posting. Thank you to the writers for being brave enough to speak the truth

93. Mike Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 11:16 pm

Im just glad Obamas on the ball and focusing on saving the planet from global warming,
or is that global cooling, ah..just climate change since it keeps changing. Besides
climate change sounds better coming from the man of change. Fukushima who?

94. Facepalm Says:


August 17th, 2013 at 11:29 pm
. (Takes a deep breath and tries to choose my words carefully so I dont get shot down
by one of the above trolls)..

Okay, okay, so stepping beside the mistake with the map, the fact that our seas are
contaminated with our waste (both nuclear and non bio degradable), global warming is
real, cancer is fatal, and a bunch of people spend money on weapons to protect
themselves against them because the billion rest of us need to wake up can I ask you
to consider what difference all this makes on your own individual mortality and future?

Can we agree that as human beings, all being exposed to different dangers in our own
individual surroundings we share an even mortality? Not as much how many chances of
dying from our exposure to our surroundings, but the fact that there is always a fatal
disease, accident, incident or stray bullet just around the corner. Regardless of who did
what and who is right here, the above comments really show the width and diversity of
our beliefs and stand points. And you know what folks, they are a lot more scary than
radioactive tuna and glow in the dark sushi.

I am not going to argue against any of the above comments because they are just too
varied and some more crazy than others, but essentially all have some chance of being
right. So it really makes no difference at all. The only thing that would make a difference
would be if we stopped addressing each other as them, considered not owning any
weapon we wouldnt want used on ourselves, realized that the Internet is not a source of
real knowledge but a collection of the worlds information (and stacks of craziness), and
actually boycotted every government or corporation that pollutes or wages war on our
shared global society. But that is never going to happen, is it!? I would like to believe in
US and a global agreement, but its pure science fiction and a utopian dream. Sadly
things need to get a lot worse before we see any kind of real international cooperation and
synergy.

At this point in my comment, three of you are preparing to troll me, some have moved on
to the sport results, several are now looking at cat videos, a lot of people are back on
Facebook, most of you are tired, and nearly all of you need to go to sleep.

If one or two decided to enjoy the rest of their lives never stepping on other people,
getting into pointless arguments on the net, or ever threatening to shoot the neighbors dog
again, well done. I am glad I could share my thoughts with you, from one humble human
to another.

One final note to those of us with personal faith, guns, cancer, aids, radiation sickness, no
passport, or any life shortening disease: four of these are non-curable and I really pray
that you will enjoy the life you have left to the fullest, two of these can be fixed by
spending your money on traveling as much as possible, and only one is the way to your
personal freedom. Ill give you a hint, the last one isnt guns.

95. k.manley Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 12:01 am
The Bible doesnt save, but God does. He created it all. He sees all and remembers all. So
if you are one of His kids, you will be protected. Pray and listen. There is evil and there is
God. Who do you stand with??

96. FlyingCosak Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 12:19 am

here we sit as pawns you know that this world is ran by commerce ,corporations have
more power than governments so they raise the bars for toxic limits and create recessions
and depressions to suppress the middle class from stopping the greed factor ,everyone
should realize that these guys are supposed to work for us not against us ,its time for us to
unite and pull our heads out of the sand and become the human beings we are entitled to
be

97. benwelgoed Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 12:22 am

About this being an opinion piece: Well, Gary signed up for that, considering that right
under the headline it says: Opinion by Gary Stamper.

Now about that Scientists say the only safe level of radiation is zero. In a way thats
true, since one cannot predict the damage that occurs. However, we ourselves, all living
beings, dead objects, and everything we eat, drink and breath, ALL contain some low
concentration of radioactive elements, causing what is called the background radiation
level. There is no escaping from that, and so, the Scientists statement is as red a herring
as it comes, and totally useless. It would be way more helpful to state the levels recorded
and to compare that to the known background radiation level for various environments.
Seems any and all official entities are falling short of their duty to measure the actual
levels and to write a comprehensive comparison report on it all.

98. Annie Simmonds Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 12:51 am

This is a world disaster, for it affects the world as a whole. I find it incomprehensible that
governments have not taken this more seriously, and that most of the information has
been kept from the public. There is no way yet of knowing how this might increase
cancers in people throughout the world, as we are already poisoning ourselves with GM
foods, antibiotics in animals and fish that s farmed. The human race is the most
destructful species on this planet, and we had all better wake up and stop this insane
destruction.

99. Joe Hess Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 1:09 am
A suggestion? Im not going to jump on either side of the assumption bandwagon, until I
independently run a test proving to myself that your findings are true Im not buying your
golden wisdom, but Im going to be more wary about what I feed myself and my family
to be sure. Want more people to feel at ease about the information provided here? The
entire article has the feel of hastily gathered notes and facts, not the polished feel of a
well-formulated and presented body of information, and that rough feel isnt going to
help your goal of getting people to hear what you have to say. I know its getting in bed
with a devil you may not like, but were all sleeping with it clean your article up, make
it more presentable, and youll have a bigger audience, whether you are speaking high
truth or are hoodwinking us as much as you say the mainstream mindset, media and
institution is

100. Kay Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 3:34 am

I am disgusted it read statements from people claiming the radiation will never reach the
US and the radiation is diluted and not as bad as people think. Childhood leukemia is up
250% on the west coast of the USA. The clicks per minute of radiation is running 500-
1000 across the country when it used to be 5 cpm of just solar radiation. I measured what
was in the CPM in the USA and it contained plutonium 238/239 reactor and weapons
grade, cesium 134, cesium 137, iodine 131, neptunium, strontium 90. This is what people
are breathing and in the last few days the reactor started to steam and release radiation
gases. The radiation from Fukushima is in every part of the world and there is no safe or
diluted amount of radiation that wont cause or DNA damage. Look at one particle of
Plutonium in your lung does to lung tissue.

101. JustAnotherFace Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 3:43 am

After Reading this article (And many others) about The Fukushima Incident and the
Fallout, I have, along with most everyone else here, Decided that I am now an expert on
Nuclear accidents and Radiation, making the Following statements I make on here law
and Irrefutable.

Radioactivity is bad. Prove me wrong. If ANY amount has leaked (Past) or is leaking
(present) into the ocean, we need to find out why/where/how much and what the affects
will be. Argue that point. I dare ya. *Insert pulp fiction scene here*

Next,
Give the guy a break people. Hes trying to do the research that each of you excuses-for-
humanbeings should have been doing in the first place. Now you only do it (Very little of
it) to criticize him. And to what end? Grow up and realize that whats going on here is
bigger than all of us.
And even if you dont agree with the information, Whether this is a huge problem or not
yet is irrelevant at this point (Bear with me). The problem is that WE DONT KNOW
WHETHER IT IS OR NOT. Well why not? It has the POTENTIAL to be a HUGE
problem, and thats an understatement. So why the hell dont we know for sure if its
something that could be such a big deal? Why doesnt anyone Care? Beats me. We
NEED to know in case it is. We cant afford to be wrong. No single person or group of
any kind is in a position to say otherwise. Its MY Earth, and its YOUR Earth.

Do your own damn homework before preaching. All of it. Welcome to the internet.

And Thank you Gary Stamper for your previous and continuing effort to keep our lazy
asses informed.

102. aussie Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 6:54 am

Best reference for radiation spread can be found here.. http://sirocco.omp.obs-


mip.fr/outils/Symphonie/Produits/Japan/SymphoniePreviJapan.htm

Stands to reason ocean currents will have a play.

103. michelle Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 7:06 am

I am apt to overlook the map. Common sense tells me that pollution of the seas and
contamination of thefood chain is real and continues to run amuck.

eas and contamination of they food chain is

104. Carl Toothman Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 12:51 pm

All of the above could have been avoided if humans had enough sense to understand that
we are not rabbits or rats, breeding out of control causing our present day population
explosion, the root of all our evils.

105. ErinLea Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 1:08 pm

IF YOU WANT THIS ARTICLE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE AN


INFOGRAPHIC THAT SHOWS A LEGEND, DATE, AND SOURCE LINK.
106. filipreneurs Says:
August 18th, 2013 at 1:52 pm

This is scary if true. Do we have options left?

107. Michael Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 2:27 pm

how is this fallout any different than the fallouts caused by the USA testing nukes in the
pacific from 1946 to 1962 do you want to point out whos most likely the country that
causes cancer due to radiation, and how we cant eat seafood from the pacific? yah
right

108. feman Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 2:34 pm

Just another news article exploiting the ignorant with fear, same as the main-stream
media do.
Using a wave-height map as a radiation map in full knowledge that the casual reader will
take it at face value totally undermines the authors credibility.
In addition, 450 tons of radioactive water added to the pacific is diluted to negligible
levels. The pacific contains 2,800,000,000,000,000,000 tons of water.
The earth is naturally radioactive and there is no such thing as zero radiation anywhere on
the planet, so if you want zero risk, you need too leave our solar system. Good luck with
that.
Please report the truth. Lies only serve to weaken any arguments made that address real
threats to the planets health.

109. finnishwahine Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 3:23 pm

the japanese dont give a shitthey will just take their factory ships to the other side of
the planet. they rape and pilage without a thought to anyone but themselves. i do NOT
feel sorry for them for anything that happened during wwII, you can bet you hinney that
if they had the bomb first they would of dropped it without hesitationpearl harbor just
an example of their actions. they fish right off of kauai which is way illegali have seen
their boats. they will fish the oceans till there is nothing left. they kill whales just because
they want to. they dont consume it, they have tons of frozen whale meat and it it totally
illegal to kill any whale. now they are threatened by this. if anyone thought they were
being ho nest about what was freely flowing into the ocean is nuts. i have a friend in
hawaii who is a captain of big vessels and they avoid japan because if they get any
radiation on their hulls they will be denied entry into other harbors around the world! of
course the governement is lying to usduh
110. INCIDENTE FUKUSHIMA aggiornamenti - Pagina 25 Says:
August 18th, 2013 at 4:11 pm

[...] At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over L'uomo ha
scoperto la bomba atomica, per nessun topo costruirebbe una trappola per topi. (Albert
Einstein) Rispondi quotando [...]

111. Stilts Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 5:21 pm

Wow! So much negativity here! So many people completely dismissing the ENTIRE
article because the dude used the wrong graphic! Are you kidding me? All of these
armchair scientists shouting down the article and the stats used therein. I wonder if these
naysayers are also climate change deniers??? The two sound an awfully lot alike

112. LeeSummit Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 6:20 pm

So this new video

if you read the actual article it comes from


(http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/news/50176), it says this in the second
to last paragraph:

Tentatively assuming a value of 10 petabecquerel (PBq) for the net 137Caesium (Cs)
input during the first weeks after the Fukushima incident, the simulation suggests a rapid
dilution of peak radioactivity values to about 10 Bq/m during the first 2 years, followed
by a gradual decline to 12 Bq/m over the next 47 years. The total peak radioactivity
levels would then be about twice the pre-Fukushima values. While this may sound
alarming, these levels are still lower than those permitted for drinking water, said
Bning.

So, again full context is important. Whether you mistake wave height for radiation, or
say the amount of radiation is going to double in the Pacific without mentioning that
double the amount of radiation is still considered a safe amount for drinking water
what youre doing is lying by leaving out part of the story. The word for this is
prevaricating. Learn it, because this word seems to be the whole foundation on which
you stand.

113. Jeanne Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 6:30 pm

These very things going on right now are the result of man ruining the earth for selfish
gain.Even though some sincere efforts are being made today to reverse the damage to
earth and its resources, many are concerned that such efforts are too little too late. The
only permanent solution is found at Revelation 11:18. There the Bible states that Jehovah
will bring to ruin those ruining the earth. Jehovah will not only eliminate the
mismanagement of the earth and its resources but also ensure that the earth will produce
abundantly for all its inhabitants. All obstinate disregard for Gods purpose and all
exploitation of the earth for selfish personal advantage will be put to a stop. On the other
hand, those who willingly support Jehovahs rulership will experience the reality of the
words found at Psalm 72:16: There will come to be plenty of grain on the earth; on the
top of the mountains there will be an overflow.

In his infinite love and wisdom, Jehovah has purposed that mankind will live in and care
for their homea paradise earth. (Genesis 1:28) Under his rulership, obedient mankind
will learn to utilize natural resources wisely, without depleting earths abundant
storehouse. How grateful we are for such a loving Provider, who will satisfy the desire of
every living thing!Psalm 145:16..shared from jw.org.Watchtower

114. LeeSummit Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 6:33 pm

Not to be picky, but youre also citing your sources incorrectly. It would be nice if you
posted one of these scary simulation graphics/videos from its original source rather than
a 3rd party blog that takes it out of context, or intentionally deleted that context to
support their own agenda (cough wave height). If youre looking to win an argument
using facts, citing a blog called Jeromie Williams Eats the Internet for Breakfast is not
going to help.

However, if you go to the source of the simulation he posted http://www.geomar.de/en/,


and search for fukushima, you are then taken here:
http://www.geomar.de/en/service/kommunikation/singlepm/article/fukushima-wo-bleibt-
das-radioaktive-wasser/

The first hit that comes up links you to the actual source of this graphic AND its
accompanying article explaining what those scary colors swirling across the sea actually
mean. Again, the source is here:
http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/news/50176

115. Sergi Kent Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 7:39 pm

I agree with feman above. Lies and hysterical overstatements weaken the cause of
making our planet a better place. You still have the stupid wave height graphic up
knowing it is completely unrelated to the radiation story. Why? One more hysteric
falsehood. Incredibly worrisome levels of cesium, including short-lived radioactive
cesium-134, have been found near
Really? Read the source article. In over two pounds of plankton, they found only half the
radioactivity that is naturally found in a single banana and it was of a type that breaks
down in 25 months. You need to go back to school and learn some science before you
make a mockery of it.

116. James Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 9:44 pm

Id like to offer something a bit less polarized than the average comment has been thus
far, and hopefully a bit more fair. Reading this kind of panic-inciting writing does make
the skeptical reader see red flags. I am one of those who is a big fan of modern
technology and who has an eye for pseudo-science. At the same time, its absolutely no
secret that human technological advancements have proceeded in geological leaps and
bounds. There is every reason to suspect and to expect that we do leave an impact on the
ecosystem. Ecosystems develop and stabilize over massive periods of geological time.
The ripple effects of suddenly disrupting those delicate ecosystems are very genuine and
real. This article almost certainly makes claims that are not yet substantiated. But
longitudinal studies require time. Just because the data arent in yet doesnt mean a
certain amount of damage isnt being done. Clearly, we cant all stop eating. But it is
certainly time that we begin to look for solutions. We humans seem to have a knack for
waiting until the last possible minute to take action. That may not be the wisest course
when it comes to our planet.

117. john hall Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 10:16 pm

Quit fear mongering and buy a gamma ray spectrophotometer and MEASURE the
radiation levels in seafood or pay a lab to do it!

118. steveN Says:


August 18th, 2013 at 11:07 pm

To Gary Stamper:
Your new graphic is more like it. The spread of Radiation in the Pacific will depend on
the oceanic currents, maps of which are freely available, and have obviously been
adapted to your latest graphic. The time scales on that graphic are still a little long. There
is already contamination of the American/Canadian Pacific coast. Whilst the US refuses
to monitor. the Canadians actually switched off their monitors. Your title of the piece, is
the greatest tragedy. The loss of a huge food resource for the earths people, and the
suffering of those creatures. NaturalNews.com is on this story too. The more sites we can
get this on, means we can subvert the global elite media conspiracy of silence. Just keep
at it!
119. clive Says:
August 18th, 2013 at 11:43 pm

I dont doubt this is a big issue we should be concerned about. It is.

But that does not change the fact that several of the items you note are unfounded and
inaccurate speculation.

Like the polar bear article. You are basing that it is radiation on what evidence? There are
other diseases that cause this. And you ignore that the problem in other mammals was
occurring BEFORE the Fukushima disaster, just in smaller numbers. You dont think
global warming might cause stress and starvation issues from problems with their normal
hunting patterns.

But before they have done testing that shows they have radiation contamination you are
already using that in your article as support for your article.

Things like this are why people are being critical of your page. Not because you are
raising concern.

Add in the claims of several of your bullet points not having any citation at all.

Or the links go to something that isnt a citation:

Alaska Halibut also found with same Fuku-cesium contaminant but did not migrate to
Japans waters. How did cesium-134 get into Alaska halibut?

All your link there did was take me to a wiki page on Halibut, not an article on
contamination detected.

Do you not see the issue?

You could have done this page without speculation and distortion and still raised a
serious alarm.

Im all for you getting the word out using the FACTS. Not speculation or theory. But
FACTs.

What you are doing is Yellow journalism.

And sadly you are your own worst enemy here. You do more harm to getting a legitimate
concern out to people by resorting to this sort of yellow journalism.

120. Genevieve Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 12:38 am
It is so funny to hear all the negative comments from people. Are you guys even thinking
for yourself? Water moves freely in the ocean. Of course it is going to spread all over.
You dont need to be a scientist to figure this out! How do you think they are going to
pump out the contaminated water from the rest of the ocean? It really makes sense to you?
And where are they going to put it?

I donT understand why you dont want to believe this is happening, because you donT
want your life to change?

121. Sad Fish Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 12:53 am

Just posted this link on my Facebook, saying it is not stupid to be worried and this is
what a frined that lives on Vancouver island replied right away :

We should all be worried .I have a really good giger counter .A few months ago I tested
a fresh batch of merrell mushrooms and it was 50% more radioactive than background
radiation.I also tested a FROZEN salmon and it was reading about 20 % higher .My
friend ate it for supper that night .I could only shake my head.

122. j Says:
August 19th, 2013 at 4:07 am

its a waste of time trying to educate people who refuse to listen or learn. but, i was very
suspicious about the radiation threats to the water. i started researching this compared to
chernobyl, and one of the biggest differences was the air and water vs being landlocked.
the levels were different, but chernobyl is still a forbidden area, no one goes there for
very long at all. usually never in one place, just walking through b/c theyre doing a
documentary or something. otherwise its a ghost-town. i think everyone knows that
though, but compared to this, everything goes straight into the water. major amounts of
wind blowout, in addition to whatever is going out through the land. and japan is only the
size of california. i was in korea right before it happened, then i can back. when i got
back, i was happy because i knew it would be safer to be further away. it breaks my heart
for japan. i know the sea and land is a huge love, and way beyond. and i pray for my
friends there, i love JP, because of my loved ones there. nuclear waste is powerful. my
heart breaks.

123. Rob Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 4:46 am

Im all for reading everything I can about being safe, for the sake of myself and my
family. Obviously, looking at some of the negative, egotistical, and naive statements
made in response to the post only proves that many humnas simply are not that intelligent.
Good luck to you, youll need it, since thats about all you have
124. Chris Sandys Says:
August 19th, 2013 at 6:17 am

Ha Ha Liberals debunked by their own over-reach.

Wow, at this rate, an entire Olympic sized pool of minimally radioactive water into the
Pacific every 8 days.

You guys (gals Genevieve for example) are being laughed at by us.

125. Meris Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 6:26 am

Because of its 104 nuclear reactors on the soil of the U.S., the authorities and mainstream
media are trying to keep Americans in ignorance about the seriousness of the effects of
the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe on health and the environment in the U.S. and in
Japan. Here is a chilling article about adverse genetic effects from Chernobyl appearing
in future generations, also projected for the populations in Fukushima written by a
renowned Swiss professor and member of International Physicians for the Prevention of
Nuclear War : http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.ch/2012/11/fukushima-precious-tims-has-
been-lost.html

126. katherine isheim Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 6:50 am

good the sooner the people of this world is gone from it the better off it will be bring on
death but just to humans

127. roger Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 7:49 am

You could take an image from Ken Buesslers presentation at Helens symposium last
March. His PDF presentation included a graphic showing releases through Nov. 2012
which is about as recent as your gonna get. Sorry, there isnt a way to upload an image.

128. Fayola- A Research Student Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 9:31 am

If someone warns me or shares information I should look into which may preserve my
health, prolong my life and that of my descendants I will stop and research further. As a
precaution, if there is ANY imminent danger to my well being or my family, I will avoid
the source until it is KNOWN to be safe. This seems like a no brainer. I could be
wrong,and I love wild caught Pacific salmon. After taking all my precautions, then I
would research further for reputable sources before forming a final personal opinion
returning to my former fish eating habits. You just cant go back after the damage is done.
Debates and resistance are useless after the fact. Ultimately, everyone here simply has a
personal decision, do I change my habits or continue with them? Its personal. As for me,
I consider the record of the FDA, the EPA and Greed questionable enough that I am
taking my own safety measures. Just my take.

129. Eric Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 10:27 am

beware of 40 cm of radiation

130. Fayola- A Research Student Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 11:05 am

World Nuclear News has substantial data on this

http://www.world-nuclear-
news.org/RS_Groundwater_works_intensify_at_Fukushima_1508131.html

131. Sub genius Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 12:18 pm

Thanks for trying to get the word out. As you obviously know it is a thankless endeavour.
Most of the people left in this world only care about themselves and questioning the
world interrupts our precariously constructed reality.
Keep up the good fight. Haters gonna hate.

132. RC Says:
August 19th, 2013 at 2:29 pm

If there were no safe levels of radiation than no one would be allowed to work near
nuclear reactors, yet I have and Im fine. As part of a teaching lab I got to expose samples
to highly radioactive material and Im fine, as is everyone else in the class. Believe it or
not there are safe levels of radiation, even atomic radiation, which for the record isnt a
thing. There is alpha, beta, and gamma radiation and they are not equally bad for you. But
in all cases there are acceptable limits, like with radiation therapy. This is the same
nonsense as the LHC, non scientific people ranting about science they do not understand.

133. Anonymous Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 3:59 pm
Excuse me but radiation from nuclear fallout is NOT FINE. Didnt you see the
Fukashima veggies in Japan? Every earthquake is potential for another Fukashima to
happen. We were clearly warned that God will destroy those who destroy the Earth, so
dont think going to church on Sunday is going to save anybody. Disengage the power
plants while we still have a chance. Havent you noticed the increased frequency and
intensity of earthquakes over the past 10 years? Wake UP.

134. CheezisLuvzyu Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 4:21 pm

Go back to your X-box people.


Nothing to see here.
If it was important it would be on TV.
Your governments and your religions got your back.

135. Morgaine Hager Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 5:09 pm

Say what you will.. Very few doctors do any testing that actually shows presence of
radiation in the HUMAN body. I have been testing humans for about 20 years for
environmental toxins. Suddenly in the past 6 months radiation is showing up. Am I
concerned? You bet. I live on the coast of Washington State. At the very least babies
need to be monitored for hypothyroidism. We definitely have a public health system with
heads in the sand. If we dont look, of course we dont find it. Panic? We should have
been concerned a very long time ago about many substances causing cancer and other
diseases. We are concerned with finding the cure, for instance new and better
chemotherapy. I want to walk for the
Prevention. What a concept.

136. Tyler Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 7:35 pm

Hard to find info, huh? I typed the word Fukushima into Google, which finished the
spelling for me, and this National Geographic article was the top hit:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/08/130819-japan-ice-wall-for-
fukushima-radioactive-leaks/

Fear mongering and spreading misinformation and disinformation only exacerbates the
issue. If you dont understand the science, and cant site reputable sources, please keep
your OPINIONS to your self.

137. RussD. Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 7:48 pm
to all the nay sayers everybody thought Noah lost his marbles when he was building the
ark but guess who didnt drown Noah.

138. Fayola- A Research Student Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 7:49 pm

MORE REPORTS FROM WORLD NUCLEAR.ORG much of which appears to agree


with this article, at least in part. There is a paragraph on the fish and radioactivity in the
water.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/Features/Fukushima/Situation-at-Fukushima/

139. mike smith Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 8:04 pm

Well, Godzilla had to come from somewhere didnt he?

140. Amanda Wilson Says:


August 19th, 2013 at 10:28 pm

This article is horribly incorrect. The articles you cite to your points contradict what you
say, not reviewed in any way, are not based on any scientific evidence whatsoever and
extremely bias. Its a shame that people like you are able to propagate such
misinformation, You should be ashamed to have this website.

141. T. Norman Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 12:15 am

Oh my godan asteroid is going to hit us in 300 yearsthis is the worst thing to


happen to the human race
Cmonwasnt it the climate people saying that the oceans will rise to unsustainable
levels, that the icecaps are melting at an exponential rate?
This gal may know what shes talking about when it comes to the science of radioactive
elements, but she does not know how the radiation from the Japanese plant will effect the
worlds ecosystem.
I will end by saying Ill believe it when I see it.

142. Mimi Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 1:05 am

Thank you for posting this. Im sick at the trashing of our planet. And the steady stream
of radioactivity streaming from Fukushima seems beyond anyones power to solve.
Nuclear power is fine and great and wonderful, but youd better make sure the reactor
part of the system is located at least 93 million miles away to avoid contamination issues.

143. Alan Carr Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 1:40 am

Gary, adding video & quotes by Dr. Helen Caldecott further erodes your credibility. No
where in her biography does she indicate any studies in nuclear science or related areas.
You can read all about her failed political campaigns, anti-nuclear protests and her rage
against the machine. Cherry-picking data is an insult to your readers-STOP IT.

144. Keith G Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 1:59 am

The thing that bugs me is that the website is so screwed up that you cant even read the
whole thing because words are being truncated. Lame science, lame research and lame
presentation.

145. clive Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 2:07 am

Genevieve Says, I donT understand why you dont want to believe this is happening

Try reading the constructive criticism. It isnt that all of us dont think there is a problem
coming.

It is that with all the irregularities, inaccuracies, to completely false claims by the article
the page does more harm than good.

For example again, the problem found on polar bears and other mammals was occurring
BEFORE Fukushima. Just not as often. But then before Fukushima Sea ice levels were
better. The same sea ice the bear rely on for hunting their primary food source. Seals. The
author presumes without any facts that it is radiation, not simple starvation affecting and
stress diseases as a result of that starvation.

You dont see the problem with that?

The author should have stuck to the facts, not Yellow Journalism. And now has given the
denialists all the leverage they want by showing this page as an example of lies.

That hurts getting an honest warning out.


146. News Says:
August 20th, 2013 at 2:09 am

Just reported on NHK Japanese news station 300 tons of contaminated water is sealing
into ocean each day

147. clive Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 2:15 am

@Fayola

That main claim of the reactor leaking more than previously is about the only part that is
accurate on this page.

It is too bad that the author didnt just stick to that.

148. Joel Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 2:40 am

OK, all of you doubters and apologists for the nuclear interests, or perhaps you just dont
like science, perhaps you could consider this: Very large pieces of debris for the disaster
in Japan are reaching our shores: Boats, houses, pieces of factories, etc. Do you really
think that the radioactive water from the power plant is not headed our way? I suggest
you eat all the fish you want, and surf well. You are STUPID, and on your way out. You
cannot deny science, you cannot dent the tides, you cannot deny the currents, and you
sure as hell cannot deny the fact that radioactive water is poisoning the pacific fish and
has headed our way. Are you scared? Does that make you a denier? Or are you just a fool?
Go to the beach. Hang out often, eat fish you catch. I give you three years to have
lymphoma, kidney/pancreatic cancer, absolute impotence, and a host of other maladies.
At least you will die young and stupid.

149. Ed Says:
August 20th, 2013 at 3:08 am

OK, you want a more serious BACK UP on this, then go to National Geographic:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/08/130807-fukushima-
radioactive-water-leak/

150. John Pettitt Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 4:32 am
There are 2.8 billion cubic kilometers of water in the Pacific so 400 tons of contamination
is 400 / 2.8*10^18 or one part contaminated water per 7,000,000,000,000,000 or 1 in 7
Quadrillion
Keep in mind the contaminated water is itself in the parts per million range so the actual
contamination level is in the parts per Sextillion range.
While there could be hotspots, particularly close to the plant, the risk posed to the Pacific
food chain is as close to zero as makes no difference.

151. Bob Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 4:40 am

2,500,000,000 Bq/liter max radioactivity in leaky trench water reported by TEPCO


2,500,000,000,000 Bq/Ton (1000 liters/ton)
1,125,000,000,000,000 Bq/day at 450 tons/day
1,145,643,750,000,000,000 Bq/3 years (assuming Cesium-137 half-life of 30.17 yr)

748,759,660,251,428,000 tons of Pacific Ocean (170,000,000 cubic miles)


492,750 tons Fukushima water released in 3 years
0.0000000000658% percent of Pacific Ocean that is contaminated
753,934 Bq/ton in Pacific Ocean (assuming 100% dispersal)
754 Bq/liter (1000 liters/ton)
94 Bq per 8 oz theoretical (assuming seafood assimilates at 1:1 vs water)
0.17 Bq per 8 oz actual Bluefin tuna (highest measured, at 5 Bq in a 15 Kg fish)

50 Bq/cubic meter house air (due to radon, avg USA house)


66,115 Bq airborne in avg 1,800sf house
500 2-liter breaths in a cubic meter
21,600 breaths/day at 15 per minute
43 cubic meters breath per day
2,160 Bq/day typical exposure from house air
0.0077% percent of Bq per day, eating 8 oz tuna at its highest published radiation
12,960 times greater measured health risk from breathing than from eating fish 8 oz/day
4.36% percent of Bq per day, eating 8 oz seafood at theoretical radiation dispersal
23 times greater theoretical health risk from breathing than from eating fish 8 oz/day

152. deBeer Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 6:17 am

Just got back from Washington, BC and Alaska. The wildlife was abundant and healthy
looking. Fishing was phenomenal. In Juneau there were literally hundreds of thousands of
healthy large salmon. All along the coast the sane story. River after river, stream after
stream filled with healthy salmon and hungry and healthy looking bears eagles etc.
Bottom fish such as Halibut were also plentiful with no signs of disease or stress. I live in
So Cal and the blue fin tuna look extremely healthy, although no albacore run to speak of
this yearbut that happens
153. Kia Mistilis Says:
August 20th, 2013 at 6:18 am

Hello everyone,

Here is a detailed report on the global effects of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, posted in
Marcg, 2013. The information is backed by scientific and medical sources, which are
credible and independent of the nuclear industry. Our govts and the worlds mainstream
media cannot be relied upon to inform us, so we have to educate ourselves. This is a self
education website for the benefit of communities world wide. Please consider reading the
Fukushima report, checking out the links and sources, and sharing with your networks.
Kia Mistilis
independent journalist.

http://www.nukefreefuture.com/fukushima2012/

154. Ken Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 8:32 am

Fantastic information and insight on something that wont be presented on common


media platform.
For those people complaining about the credibility and reliability of information. Why
dont you disprove it by providing some of your accurate information?
That Id like to see.

155. drusilla Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 11:51 am

It is very clearnuclear power,is poisening the plant with the multitude of


emissions,(industrial)poisening from factories,the seas with radioactive waste,oil rigs in
the millions,holes in the ozone, exploration,dynomiting,deforresting,fracking,polluted
inland waters,this planet whether you accept it or not is in a lot of trouble from us.so
stop writing and do something positive,get on the streets.protest with your
personscaremongering?no..a wake up callthat or just go sleepwalkinng to your
death,and leave the next genration with ourstinking mess.At 71 having marched against
nuc since I was a girlbeing entirely convinced of what I see of the world,act now,or pay
the price through our children and future genrations

156. Facepalm Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 12:51 pm

Great to see so many people repeating each others points, missing the point entirely or
just showing off their extreme level of ignorance, racism and prejudice. We have no right
to point blame at any authority as long as we sit on our asses and try and google each
other into submission with links and statements that should prove the other guy wrong.
Get on with your lives people and consider every single word you type or utter. Those of
us with faith, we need to stop preaching and truly understand the message and example
shown to us in scripture. Only by doing and acting on our faith can we be of any use to
our fellow human beings. Without mentioning any of the above posters by name, some of
you need to stay away from posting your opinions anywhere online or voicing them in
public, you will get hurt. Anonymity is a false shelter to hide in, what goes around comes
around. And to those citing common sense, fantastic, I am glad I am not alone. There are
a lot of well grounded people out there who know how to filter news and base opinion on
real knowledge and experience. And then there are the Fox News viewers who even non-
Christian observers continue to pray for as they get further and further sucked into the
hole created by Rupert Murdoch and his minions. Dumbness has no cure and can be
spread across borders and continents by so many different carriers that it is hard to
protect yourself. If you take precautions like reading books, traveling outside your home
country and examining the opinions and statements of people you disagree with you
stand a good chance of never being hit by this awful disease. Have a great day everyone.

157. Matt Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 2:08 pm

A little radiation might be good for fish if it stops us eating them

158. Chad Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 2:34 pm

Scientist are aware that there is a background radiation level. Bananas emit radiation. Im
not downplaying the severity of the fukushima incident, however you need to keep your
brains about you, and not be such an alarmist.

Yes Fukushima happened, yes its a tragedy. Yes future nuclear power needs more safety
protocols, and ways to permanently seal (entomb) the reactor in a crisis.

Now what do you want our gov to do about it?

Make the radiation go away?

Tell you that you cant eat anymore?

The nature of life is ever in change. This is bad, but life will overcome.

I for one will continue to live until i die.


For all i care, you can go hide in a hole in the ground, and grow your own food, (mind
you will still be radioactive from fukushima fallout. The background radiation level will
increase worldwide as the new radio isotopes are being destributed.)

So be afraid, and cause mass panic and rioting, or have your wits about you, and try to
learn to really deal with the threats of our new world, which i might add you have
absolutely no control over.

159. Newman Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 3:40 pm

Our world is a finely balanced eco system and yes we are ripping the guts out of that
balance. Radiation is one issue but thats gonna take awhile. We continue to dump raw
sewage and other chemicals into our water ya know that stuff that makes up 70% of the
human body, I.m just hopping monsanto can modify our genos enough to be able to
thrive off radiation, plastic and raw sewage.

160. Victor Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 3:58 pm

On a positive note, at least we wont be overfishing the ocean by 2030. The radioactive
life now has a fighting chance!

161. jus10 Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 5:22 pm

I just caught a blue fin tuna off the LA coast and it was already seared. I guess there is
something positive about the Fukushima radiation

162. Gary Stamper Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 7:17 pm

LOL!!! (Hey, you got to keep a sense of humor throughout all this!

163. Kim Roberson Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 8:07 pm

Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network members Beyond Nuclear, Citizens for Health
and Ecological Options network filed a Citizen Petition with FDA to significantly lower
the current allowable recommendation levels for Cesium 134 and 137 in US food,
nutritional supplements, and pharmaceuticals, comments are being accepted now
http://www.regulations.gov/#!submitComment;D=FDA-2013-P-0291-0001
164. Kim Roberson Says:
August 20th, 2013 at 8:10 pm

FDA is accepting comments now on Fukushima Fallout Awareness Networks Citizen


Petition to lower current recommended levels of C 134 and 137 for food, nutritional
supplements and pharmaceuticals
http://www.regulations.gov/#!submitComment;D=FDA-2013-P-0291-0001

165. Melissa Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 8:11 pm

This so reminds me of an article I read in Life Mag years ago about the bomb testing in
New Mexico, I think! One lady suddenly realized that she was the ONLY person on her
block who was still alive. The rest had died of cancer. Some farmer had 25,000 sheep just
fall over dead. The government told him they died of malnutrition.. Most telling,
EVERY person who was in a movie made with John Wayne, including all actors,
directors, camera people, and even the food servers all died of cancer. They shot that
movie within a couple of miles of the testing back in the 50s. Its a world gone mad and
going madder. Weve totally screwed ourselves..

166. P Bevan Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 9:11 pm

I, for one, have wondered since the day of the earthquake and Fukishima meltdown, why
this has not been a front page story in the media. Its been a non-issue for years with no
information from any of the governments about the damage that all the contaminated
water flowing into the Pacific Ocean is doing. Its totally in our food chain now. Very
scary to say the least.

167. Frank Mezek Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 9:17 pm

Ive been eating sushi for decades.


What are the poor Japanese to do ?

Scary

168. Fukushima going from bad to worse Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 9:24 pm

[...] Some recent comment: http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/at-the-very-


least-your-days-of-eating-pacific-ocean-fish [...]
169. Fast Business Loans Says:
August 20th, 2013 at 9:55 pm

Hy ther! This i my fist isit


to your blg! We are a grou of voluntees n tating ne initiatve in a ommunity
in the same nihe. Your blog provided us beneficial informatin to ork on.
Yu have dne a marvellous ob!

170. SkyDuckPine Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 10:05 pm

Thats the most sad Melissa, the same old record keeps playing over and over again. The
reality is; mankind does not learn. Mankind remains in the same flux throughout history.
Mired in the beliefs of new generations of people thinking they are the first to experience
this; whatever this may be at any given moment in time. Sorry, there is no way out. Do
the best you can and love your neighbor as you like you liked to be loved.

171. Lucy Says:


August 20th, 2013 at 11:23 pm

What I find most disturbing is the amount of people here saying theyre ok with
contaminated water leaking into the ocean as long as its a low level. I would assume
common sense in people would make them realise radiactive anything leaking even in
small doses is NOT OK. It is the people here who care more about the exaggeration of
the article and hardly care about what is really happening that is seriously worrying.
Wake up people. Radiation is clearly unsafe even in small doses, why do you think it#s
kept in massive concrete buildings where people have to wear special suits and wash and
have all kinds of checks when they work there? The effects of radiation are well known.
This should not be shrugged off and accepted as a fact of life ever.

172. Tracey Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 2:35 am

This is an issue that should not be ignored!!!


Fear makes people say silly things.
I will take this article seriously and not eat fish from the Pacific, sorry fishermenmaybe
find a new career. I am also question this shmeat business I may go vegetarian all
together http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2013/06/05/shmeat-the-first-in-vitro-
hamburger/index.html
I believe the FDA and government are corporations trying to take advantage and make
money off people. They have no compassion or care about the human raceif anything
they have an agenda for population control. Whats a few million deadmore room for
the elite to play.
173. mark Says:
August 21st, 2013 at 2:43 am

Anyone downplaying this disaster isnt paying attention. Japan just raised the level to 3
out of 7. its actually become a serious problem, as radiation levels are higher than
theyve ever been. http://www.tepco.co.jp/cc/press/2013/1229887_5117.html

174. Kristi Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 3:00 am

Go ahead and eat the fish if you wanna eat radiation. Whats wrong with you people?
Everyone refuses to open their eyes and actually believe that we are destroying our own
home and feeding our children poisons!Everyone needs to wake up and realize what is
happening before its too late to do anything.

175. So much for the fight to save the West Coast wild salmon Why Aren't You
Outraged? Says:
August 21st, 2013 at 3:19 am

[...] At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over | Collapsing
Into Consciousness Radiation by Gary Stamper. The heart-breaking news from
Fukushima just keeps getting worsea LOT worseit is, quite simply, an out-of-control
flow of death and destruction. TEPCO is finally admitting that radiation has been leaking
to the Pacific Ocean all along. and its NOT over [...]

176. enviroscientist Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 5:47 am

Just a word of advice: If you want people to join your cause, use accurate and undeniably
hard facts, not opinions and conspiracy theories.

As a marine bio specialist who studies fish populations in estuaries for a living, I agree
that this event poses a significant risk to the entire oceanic ecosystem, top to bottom. It IS
a fact that radiation levels have gone up in fish populations in most places, and its also
something completely natural. Not all radiation is man-made. There are definite spikes
and abnormalities in some areas of the ocean in recent years that should be looked into
further, but you cant just go rabble-rousing about it without something solid to go on.

And as soon as you found out your map was inaccurate, you should have removed it. It
seems to me you just like the fearful look of it to get the article some attention. Its
colorful and grabs the eye but its also downright irresponsible to leave it up.

As far as the server shut-down because of visits, thats all it is. No conspiracy to shut you
up here. Your server just couldnt handle the unplanned load. Simple, simple tech issue.
Its not unbelievable your article garnered so much attention because it is a scary thing
that people want to know more about.

Sadly, there are too many articles like this one with zero facts and too much of a
conspiracy twist to it, to get anyone to pay serious attention.

You are hurting the very cause you seek to assist. Educate yourself and get some
journalistic standards for Gods sake.

177. Jim Morrison Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 5:57 am

Get your kicks before the whole shithouse goes up in flames.

178. Tyler Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 6:34 am

It would be the responsible thing to do to delete this post from your website.

Reported today (8/20/12) by the BBC:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23776345

179. Marik Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 7:07 am

You still should take down the incorrect image. I got here from facebook and when this
article is linked to from facebook, the incorrect NOAA image appears HUGE and EYE
Catching and this impacts ones perception of the entire article.

180. Amlongo Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 7:46 am

All I can say is Thanks for all the work to get the truth out! We need to go solar now!
Stop all the wars and get into making wind and solar our #1 priority! We need people like
you to get the truth out and keep it out there so the nay sayers can get educations!

181. Heath Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 8:59 am

We need to kill this story. Pretty much everyone I know that eats a lot of sushi are
douchey. We have a chance to save the world by ending future generations of douche
bags..
182. mmbls Says:
August 21st, 2013 at 3:48 pm

I got scared for a minute. I live off pacific seafood. but there is no evidence here. Im not
saying this isnt possible. but until the author of this provides sources from peer-reviewed
articles, containing actual data, these statements can be considered nothing more than fear
mongering.

183. Joe the Concern US Citiz. Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 4:17 pm

Of all that is going on in this world it has become very obvious that all the world citizens
need to hold our governments responsible and accountable for these and all issues of this
magnitude. the citizens of this planet have the birth right to know what is happening and
to be part of the solution. All the pointing of fingers and blame giving will not fix this. At
this moment all the worlds top scientists, engineers, physicists, etc need to be working
on this RIGHT NOW, because this will affect all of us. Once in the food chain and water
supply, how do you remove radiation? And all the fighting in Europe stop. Focus your
energy on fixing this because if we all dont this planet earth will be in habitable, in other
words it will be a ball of radiation that no one can live on, no one. Am I the only one that
feels this way. What awaits us is more devastating, horrific, life ending than we as a
human race have seen. We need to stop taking the candy coated reality and face what is
in front of us and fix that which we can.

184. that guy Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 4:32 pm

As long as bananas dont have it. then we good!

185. Emma Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 4:59 pm

So I read the article and could stand to read some of the comments and ok so these might
not be accurate and he might not have stats that are uncontainable .BUT THERE IS
RADIATION LEAKING INTO OUR SEAS!!! This is bad to ANY degree. Please stop
squabbling and put your energies to better use.

186. Claytblue Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 5:17 pm

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/8/21/japan-to-
upgradefukushimathreatlevel.html
187. Bea Garth Says:
August 21st, 2013 at 7:33 pm

The Fukishima disaster remains a controversial subject, in spite of the best attempts of
the mainstream to get us to ignore it. The unfortunate fact is that the radiation from the
nuclear power plants and their spent fuel storage at Fukishima continue to be uncontained.
They are still leaking. Its still too hot for even robots to work there to clean up the mess.
They melt. Children in the district already have a huge increase in thyroid cancer.
Alongside this is what seems to be a deliberate omission of scientists checking facts. If
we bury our heads can we assume the problem will just evaporate? Unfortunately
uncontained radiation of this magnitude can last for thousands of years. Some say this
opinion piece below goes too far. I think not Though meanwhile I am glad you
rectified some of your information.

188. cc pier Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 8:03 pm

From this video I have got the message -dont go out in the rain,dont eat food,dont
drink water and definitely dont go outside it will give you cancer or leukemia. I lived in
s. cal all my life and i know many family & friends who have died or had cancer and we
always thought it was from the atomic bomb testing in Nevada that was carried in the
wind. This Lady makes the world look even more scary, I hope this is not true.

189. Voz Floresta | Yemanja Rainha Do Mar Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 8:17 pm

[...] How strong the poison effect through water? I think that is stronger than through air.
Water has more direct contact. All the life animals and plants are vunerable to radiation.
Can marine life survive? For how long? What happens if all the living creatures in ocean
die? Can ocean produce air without life? What effects to the air, weather, water, plants?
Please see more details in this article, http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/at-
the-very-least-your-days-of-eating-pacific-ocean-fish- [...]

190. Jim Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 9:08 pm

for all the there is no evidence skeptics and those making a big deal about the map
screw up, a concrete dock washed up in my home state of Oregon a little over a year after
the quake. I think it is obvious how far the radiation has spread. duh! are you paying
attention, scientists? http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2012/06/massive-dock-from-
japanese-tsunami-washes-up-in-the-us/

btw, I was in Japan when the quake happended, and I am there now. the first thing my
Japanese friends told me whatever the government says about the situation, it is
definitely worse. The Japanese dont give bad news unless they already have a solution
for the problem. It is a cultural thing. so to all of you skeptics quoting official sources, I
laugh at your naivete.

191. Rico thai Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 9:10 pm

I hope all you conservative,bible carrying negative people also believe the earth is only
5000 years old and the end is neargo to hell

192. Lynne Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 10:20 pm

We know from recent news reports that radiation is leaking into the Pacific from the
reactor site. Whether or not everything stated in the article is correct is rather beside the
point. If its not radiation, its GMO, or fracking, or any number of other actions being
taken by governments and big business that are destroying the environment that supports
ALL life on Earth. Its not just polar bears or whales, or any other animal thats currently
in the news its the human species that will suffer the consequences of these actions.

193. taylor Says:


August 21st, 2013 at 10:30 pm

thank you for being brave enough to put the REAL truth out there. its nice to see there are
more than sheep in this country. im one of the wolves to and i just want to say thank you
again and hopefully more eyes will be opened to whats really going on

194. mary Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 1:01 am

You people are idiots blinded by the media and your own denial. You feel there is no
radiation (the fish taste great? you cant taste radiation). You probably also feel that we
are not in Global Warming. Why dont you stop believing what the media tells you and
do your own research? The sky IS falling. In 10 years you wont be able, or your kids or
grandkids wont be able, to survive the same way we do today.

195. A Nightmare for Life in the Pacific Ocean: Fukushima disaster still unfolding
Says:
August 22nd, 2013 at 2:16 am

[...] 21st Century Wire saysThe nightmare in Fukushima continues.The mainstream


media has been quiet about the most up to date information, so here it is In early July,
21wire reported on the out of control radiation levels consuming the Fukushima Daiichi
plant. Current radiation readings are off the charts and far greater than the public has been
made aware of. The latest reports claim that Fukushima could have 20-30 times more
nuclear fallout then Hiroshima and Nagasaki.This could be the worst nuclear disaster
weve seen, as Tepco now admits that nuclear material has been leaking continuously
into the ocean since the meltdown occurredAt the Very Least, Your Days of Eating
Pacific Ocean Fish Are OverGary StamperCollapsing Into Consciousness [...]

196. charles Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 5:24 am

i fish for tuna in californiathis is something serious if its true. got lots of friends
fishing right now for albacore tuna..

197. Stu from Santa Monica Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 6:10 am

anyone who thinks there is little or no consequences from dumping any kind of pollutants
in bodies of water, ground or the atmosphere is a complete moron.

whatever u believe or dont believe about the government has little to do with the fact
that eco systems cant sustain poison & crap being fed into them.

why is it so hard to believe that the human race is fucking up the planet? its been going
on for centuries and always in the name of progress & economics.

very messed up we are. i support this article and others like it. this is good work

198. Stephanie Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 6:22 am

I cant believe all this nitpicking over a map. Really sad. I dont know how factual your
article is or for that matter, dont really care. If people dont think theres a problem, oh
well, you warned them. Guess, these are the same people who believe the Gulf was
cleaned by BP after the spill. Good for you, you gave the message. If they dont believe it,
its not your problem anymore.

199. Mark Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 7:46 am

Whether one gets distracted by those who play down the seriousness of the situation or
not, rational thinking would surely alarm you as you know what is going on. Radiation is
leaking into the water , it does not go away, it will be consumed and eventually get to you,
the consumer. All these people trying to discredit the OP are all a bunch of ostriches
sticking their heads in the sand and living in the their own perfect unscathed world, free
free from poverty , illness and the ones responsible for it Get your heads out of the
ground you idiots!! Before its too late for you or you children and grandchildren.

200. Vacation: Where Everythings Made Up and the Earth Doesnt Matter | Pocket
Gypsy & Her Traveling Tales Says:
August 22nd, 2013 at 8:53 am

[...] of whether or not radioactive run-off will have an immediate or more long-term
effect, and regardless of whether this is even as big a concern as some argue it is, nothing
concerning water is an isolated [...]

201. Tom Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 2:06 pm

Recent peer-reviewed evidence indicates that accumulation of Fukushima radiation in


fish and the risk to people eating them are less than those from natural radionuclides:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23733934

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22474387

Obviously testing of radiation and resulting toxicity in water/fish/sea mammals/humans


must continue. FDA refusal to test is unhelpful.

Im not saying its fine to eat as much fish as you like, quite the opposite. Crashing
populations of most fish species through over-fishing, and the rapidly declining health of
oceans through pollution and sea temperature change are without doubt massive
problems worldwide.

There is also strong evidence for accumulation of a cocktail of persistent toxins,


microparticles, and all sorts of other nasties in marine life concentrating up the food
web, including to humans. Radiation is a risk, but only one of many.

Perhaps you could write about these more important and better-evidenced problems, in
the hope that people might change their greedy and damaging practices before its too late.

202. Mike Ferrigan Says:


August 22nd, 2013 at 7:50 pm

Many thanks for this Gary.


Even if half of it bears out its still horrific.
203. Kristina Says:
August 23rd, 2013 at 7:23 am

To all those citing websites like nature news and i hate radiation.com those sites
arent credible. They have an agenda.

To those of you criticizing the rational people asking for scientific evidence.. shame on
you.

The damage of claiming the sky is falling with every disaster is that in the end no one
cares about anything and they dont believe things even when they are true.

So lets all read Toms comments once again, be vigilant and aware and learn more. We
dont need more BS promulgated through the internet as fact.

204. Stephanie Greenham Says:


August 23rd, 2013 at 9:35 am

When the Earthquake & subsequent Tsunami hit Japan March 2011. It was televised and
documented world wide, when all knew the reactor at Fukushima had been damaged.

Dont tell me that in those moments when you viewed and learnt of this event and
information, that you didnt experience those awful feelings, a mixture of horror and
heartbreak for the people of Japan and the deep sense of sadness and helplessness
viewing that ruptured reactor.

Not long after, all the information vanishes from mainstream media. We kept on asking,
Wheres the information on Japan? What is going on?? You dont have to have a
doctorate in the sciences for goodness sake.

As a parent/grandparent, a person who loves and respects animals, nature,the ocean and
all of its beautiful, amazing animals, thank you for getting this information out there.

Nothing on the mainstream news about it in New Zealand for over two years. Its not
some illusion, or conspiracy, the facts are the facts. I am devastated that our children and
grandchildren, and all future generations will NOT experience the world as we KNEW it.

We have to be awake and informed.

205. Anonymous Says:


August 23rd, 2013 at 10:51 am

Tom & Kristina. Have you read at least one of the articles sited? The scientists in New
York are talking about a single event and not the ongoing reality. Think of the situation
rather like the closed cooling system of a car ok? Into the cooling mixture A you
introduce a one off blue dye while the engine is running and systems are normal. Into
cooling mixture B you introduce the same dye but continuously. Like the first car the
engine is running normally.
What the guys in Stony Brook New York were doing was looking at a scenario from
before the day we knew we were in a consistent dyeing event.

How will the fish ever be safe again?


Look into Greenpeaces data on the contamination of seaweed

206. Tom Says:


August 23rd, 2013 at 6:04 pm

Yes I read PNAS the papers, and many of the sources for the original article above. Both
PNAS papers estimate the peak radiation level of fish in/around Japan after the accident,
and from that estimate the risk to humans from eating the most contaminated fish. The
levels in some Japanese waters were the highest globally because although radioactive
caesium/iodine/etc do accumulate in animal tissues, the increase with accumulation
appears far less than the decrease of 100s of times through radiation being excreted, and
radiation is being dispersed.

With the exception of the most contaminated fish near Fukushima, all radiation doses to
humans were less than those from natural radioisotopes that were already in the fish.
Meaning it is not free of risk but the risk is no worse in health terms than eating fish
before the accident.

When I said testing must continue I was trying to acknowledge that studies like this are
not end of the story. Obviously all countries should continue testing whether the food
people eat is save. True science is never certain or final; it can only ever be based on
limited data and certain assumptions. Exploring the limitations is part of the process.

My point is that you cannot compare unsubstantiated speculation and conspiracy-


mongering (like this article and most of its sources) with primary research by expert
scientists, who publish their methods and results for other experts and anyone else to
scrutinise.

Also most people dont understand risk in relative terms. Radiation occurs naturally in
food, rocks and soil; it comes from space and from our sun. We also expose ourselves to
radiation though medical procedures, air travel, and many lifestyle choices. This cartoon
http://xkcd.com/radiation/ gives a nice illustration of levels of radiation exposure and
their risks. It is all about the level of exposure. When the level of risk from fish is 1/20th
of that of eating a banana, I can live with that.

As I hope you can tell from my post yesterday, I care greatly about our planet and its
beautiful and rich ecosystems, and I am appalled each day by the terrible destruction our
species is causing though its sickening, selfish greed and short-sightedness. I wish
everyone got upset about environmental issues. Please do. Educate yourself. Share
information with others. Hold your government and corporations responsible for their
actions, because they are busy trying to hide as much corruption as they can get away
with, legally or otherwise.

But, please, protest about *real* problems in the world. If you treat fake science and
conspiracy theory as truth, you will be paralysed by fear and mistrust, and you will fail to
deal with the real and serious issues in the world for example the rising sea
temperatures that may be catastrophic for life on land as well as in the sea.

If people cannot distinguish truth from misinformation then those in power who would lie
to us have won, and the loss of so much of the life on Earth (including most of humanity
and our culture) seems inevitable.

207. Ms. Sweet Says:


August 23rd, 2013 at 6:54 pm

Acts through fear and greed will create your demise. From the day you were born you
began to die. A long time you have spent on Earth and little have you learned. Worthy are
those who care and love. A time for cleansing is near.

208. Frediano Says:


August 23rd, 2013 at 9:04 pm

400 tons of contaminated water/day is about 100,000 gallons of water/day.

The Pacific Ocean contains about 187,189,915,062,857,142,857 gallons of seawater.

Of course it is not uniformly distributed, and where it is concentrated, it is concentrated,


but that is 1 part in 10^15 of contanimated water.

Another perspective; the entire BP oil spill was estimated to be about 200 million gallons
of crude oil. 200 million gallons of crude oil is a volume of oil 300ft by 300ft by 300ft.
Go look at a map of the Gulf of Mexico, and try to imagine a volume of oil 300ft by
300ft by 300 ft.

Sometimes numbers, especially large numbers, are sensational, and difficult to gauge.
Convert them to something known.

209. Frediano Says:


August 23rd, 2013 at 9:08 pm

100,000 GALLONS = a volume of water 24 ft x 24 ft x 24 ft.


210. Frediano Says:
August 23rd, 2013 at 9:14 pm

If you go to a source called nukefreefuture, then do you even need to read the report to
know in advance what it is going to say?

Seriously?

211. Hageyamasan Says:


August 24th, 2013 at 12:37 am

The simple questions that we should all be asking is,


What are they (government/corporations/EPA/etc) going to do about it?
What can we the people do to help?

212. Nancy Says:


August 24th, 2013 at 12:46 am

WAKE UP PEOPLE! ARE YOU ASLEEP?

213. Donna Says:


August 24th, 2013 at 11:28 am

Acts of Man so much worse than Acts of God!

214. Gerald Says:


August 24th, 2013 at 2:37 pm

Science Reality: The only significant impact of this man-caused radiation leak will be
to accelerate evolution, and even in this, it is not measurable. Fossil fuels kill more
people and life (and will ultimately drive the Human species to extinction) every day then
will be the final negative totals of Fukishima. Most of the bloggers here seem to care
about the planet so your goal should be first, reduce human population while concurrently
working toward electrification of the world with carbon free renewables as energy
sources. This may, or may not, require Nuclear as a source, but this may be addressed
when the enslavement shackles of Corporate-Government corruption are broken.
http://www.avweb.com/news/aeromed/181873-1.html

215. pkc Says:


August 24th, 2013 at 4:11 pm

AMENKristin
Kristin Says:
August 16th, 2013 at 9:31 pm

This is predicted in the biblesad to say we will not like the outcome This is what I
read when I see things like this and I get fearful.

Whoever dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty.
2 I will say of the Lord, He is my refuge and my fortress,
my God, in whom I trust.

216. Nicole Says:


August 24th, 2013 at 9:00 pm

If you dont believe then continue to eat some foods and fish. FYI- its already spread into
the US and will continue to spead. I suggest you eat like you live in a third world country
(rice and beans)and enjoy the time you have left. If you have anything neative to say
about my post I suggest you eat some fish.

217. Jackie Blue Says:


August 25th, 2013 at 7:34 am

I dont know enough to say that all of this is true but I do know enough to understand that
the damage is great. I want to know what the hell should I (we) do? Besides not eating
seafood, which will be very hard in my extended family, what is the Joe Blow average
citizen to do to protect their family?

218. Gary Stamper Says:


August 25th, 2013 at 11:15 am

Great question, Jackie BlueCheck out the last part of my new article at
http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/tough-love-and-fukushima-by-gary-
stamper/ on what we can do. Also, Ill have article out soon on how to minimize the
effects of radiation and protect yourself and your loved ones.

219. Fukushima mon amour | Ken Turner Says:


August 25th, 2013 at 3:52 pm

[...] Learn more here: At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are
Over [...]

220. Julian Says:


August 25th, 2013 at 9:56 pm
Why the opening graphic is still there I dont know. No image is needed at all. People
should realize two things. One, the Fukushima disaster is real and various types of
radioactive materials are flowing into the ocean and will eventually poison us. Two,
probably 98% of all bloggers are NOT professional writers or journalists, dont have the
resources to investigate, and dont have journalistic skills and many lack decent
writing/editing skills, and as Stamper indicates, this is an opinion piece.

221. David Says:


August 26th, 2013 at 6:46 pm

can you tell me where you got this picture with the NOAA symbol on it? The graphic
suggest a distribution from the northern hemisphere to the southern hemisphere in a way
that just does not conform to well known current patterns.

222. Souper Soulger Says:


August 26th, 2013 at 7:26 pm

.our herring fish are now bleeding from their eyes here in British Columbia. We first
received Japans debris on our shores and now we receive their radiation. Have a nice
day.

223. RSX Rich Says:


August 26th, 2013 at 8:42 pm

This is a very alarmist and uninformed article. The author knows not what he is talking
about. So what if 450 tons of water are coming out of Fukushima? That is the normal
amount needed to cool the plant. We need to focus on how much radiation is coming out,
not how much water. Stamper cannot even get his nomenclature correct, he labels one
figure Pacific Sea but it is the Pacific Ocean into which Fukushima is leaking. Finally, he
states that background levels have doubled. Big deal. From almost undetectable to barely
detectable. Hardly reason to stop eating Pacific seafood.

224. Amy G Says:


August 26th, 2013 at 9:12 pm

http://enenews.com/kyodo-highest-levels-of-fukushima-contamination-already-east-of-
hawaii
^^^ This article written in May of 2013!!

For anyone with doubts about the validity of this article, do some poking around on the
internet. Not on MSN or CNN or even BBC. Go to Vice. or SourceFed. Or, I dont know,
use the brain you were born with and make some deductive reasoning of your own. There
are articles all over proving that this is not a past problem. In fact, there are articles
proving 60% of what were spoon fed from our media system is downright fabricated.

All Im asking: Wake up. Think before you react. Ask yourself what you really think is
right and wrong. Move throughout your day as if you care about your carbon footprint
and people around you. You may start to realize were killing ourselves, our planet, our
economies, our lives. Wake up. Please.

I will be paying for a membership Gary. We need more people like you in this bleak
existence we call our day-to-day. I hope you continue to research and broaden minds.

225. Melanie Says:


August 26th, 2013 at 10:17 pm

What if the radiation continues to leak, this simulation seems to show it weakening from
the Japanese coast and leaving, but what if it doesnt weaken?

226. Gary Stamper Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 12:24 am

Bless you, Amy G!

227. NIRNSA Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 2:33 am

It is virtually impossible to accurately measure radiation contamination in fluids so vast


as the ocean. It is likely that the highest contamination will be near the origin of
contamination, in nearby ocean currents and on the sea floor as radioactive isotopes are
heavy.

The inaccuracy of measurement would include such a high level of error that to
extrapolate an entire picture of the whole of the Pacific Ocean would require more
measurement tools and people than currently exist.

Heres some facts. Radio Isotopes are denser than water and will sink where not carried,
pushed or pulled by ocean currents.

Radio Isotopes will dilute into the vast volume of the pacific ocean over time where the
isotopes are comparable to the density of water and be nominally detectable at best.

Measuring food contamination cannot be done with a geigerteller/counter. A long term


exposure detection per volume is needed to determine Bq/kg contamination and must be
shielded from the high level of natural radiation. If your geigerteller/counter even
measures a noticeable difference in radiation over natural radiation background, then the
food is likely to kill you the first time you eat it, or at least cause radiation sickness to
some degree.

This is not a black and white problem. I personally do not believe Japan is well suited to
handle Nuclear energy as they have demonstrated their high level of ineptitude regarding
the Dai Ichi power plant meltdowns and disregard for proper cleanup due to the desire to
spend as little money as possible showing that money trumps all in Japanese politics
but the extent of this problem is not as simple as an image.

The contamination is bad, but this reporting is not balanced as it only chooses to support
claims with not enough counter argument and improper siting of data. If you dont have a
background in nuclear energy / Radio Nuclide Survey and Analysis, it is better to consult
experts rather than other news reports by people who dont know well about what they
are talking about.

That is a lot to say, but I do approve of more people being aware that there is a problem
and wishing to do something about it but lets keep it under the level of hysteria for
panics sake.

228. cheap jordans Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 2:53 am

You created some decent points there. I looked on the net for the problem and located
most people will go along with together with your site. (Ed.: adlink removed)

229. pilar Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 6:21 am

So the map shows an abrupt north-south line on South-Americas tip, as if the


contamination stops there
But I am sure the Atlantic (and in turn other) currents take it over and keep on diluting it
into all the linked oceans and sees on earth ! An earth-map would therefore have been
nice

230. At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over Banoosh
Says:
August 27th, 2013 at 8:34 am

[...] Source of this article: CollapsingIntoConsciousness [...]

231. ST Says:
August 27th, 2013 at 10:09 am

Thank you for this important article, Gary.


Radiation from Japans Fukushima nuclear meltdowns was also found in the milk, air,
drinking water, rain, etc. in the U.S.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2011/04/09/radiation-detected-in-drinking-
water-in-13-more-us-cities-cesium-137-in-vermont-milk/

There is NO safe dose of Nuclear Radiation (which is the man-made radiation thats only
made in nuclear power plants.)

The U.S. has 100 nuclear power plants and they emit radiation into the air, water, etc.
during their daily operations.

This radiation can cause cancer, birth defects, miscarriages, heart disease, etc.

Here is a forum of Methods for combating radiation and its effects

http://enenews.com/forum-best-practices-combating-effects-radiation

Radchick on Facebook also has some good advice:

https://www.facebook.com/pages/RadChick-Radiation-Research-
Mitigation/260610960640885

Between the above-ground atomic tests, nuclear meltdowns, nuclear power plants,
nuclear labs, etc. Nuclear radiation is now part of our world. Theres no use panicking
about it. Just educate yourself and learn everything you can to protect yourself and be as
healthy as you can be.

The highly recommended site http://www.enenews.com covers the Fukushima story daily
and is a great place to learn more, too.

232. George Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 11:42 am

But its not only Fukushima radioactivity in the Pacific. Remember the Farallon Islands
off the west coast USA used as a Radioactive Waste Dump walrus.wr.usgs.gov

From 1946 to 1970, the sea around the Farallones was used as a nuclear dumping site for
radioactive waste under the authority of the Atomic Energy Commission at a site known
as the Farallon Island Nuclear Waste Dump. Most of the dumping took place before 1960
(in 1970, all dumping of radioactive wastes by the United States was terminated).
According to a 1980 report by the Environmental Protection Agency, approximately
47,500 containers, 55 gallon steel drums, were dumped in the vicinity of the Farallones,
with a total estimated radioactive activity of 14,500 Ci. All but 3,500 of these were
dumped at 3737N 12317W; the rest were dumped at 3738N 12308W.
The primary military agency which used the dumping site was the Naval Radiological
Defense Laboratory, in San Francisco, which was charged with decontamination of the
ships from the Operation Crossroads nuclear tests in 1946 and carried out additional
radiological work throughout the period. The irradiated US Navy ship USS Independence,
which was used as a target at Operation Crossroads, loaded with radioactive waste from
NRDL and other generators, was towed to sea and sunk, apparently near this site.
According to the United States Geological Survey, The exact location of the containers
and the potential hazard the containers pose to the environment are unknown. The 1980
EPA report argues that attempts to remove the barrels would likely produce more of a
risk to humans and the environment than simply letting them remain on the bottom of the
ocean.

Then there is Hanford! It is a huge messand I didnt know this but it has the potential
to explode as well.
Radioactive Waste Management
http://www.bookrags.com...

The Arctic and Baltic, North seas have been used as a dumping ground by Russia, UK,
France etc.

Its surprising there is any life left in the oceans.

233. Dan Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 1:45 pm

Yet another reason im glad im a vegetarian. Survival of the fittest in this world of man
made issues, oil in the water, radioactivity. No thanks, sone of us have evolved.

234. Adam Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 2:03 pm

This website has many scientific articles on the Fukushima disaster as well as a link to
the original Pacific ocean cs-137 contamination model video produced by Helmholtz
Center for Oceanographic Research in Germany which contains informative narration
and not just some foreboding music:
http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/news/50176

235. Kurt Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 4:17 pm

COULD to be causing an epidemic


MAY face thyroid problems
COULD double radioactivity
Not 1 actual fact. Poor reporting.

236. Joyce Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 4:35 pm

It is broken you cant fix it. People have their head up their assses because they are scared
and cowards. But you cant fix it..get it cant be fixed..People need to stop fighting put
their FKN guns down, land their planes and go home..just go home and quit this nonsense.
Love their families even the ones that hate them. Love the animals, love everything.
Because it is over. The planet is on life support and the family has been called in. Pray
that their are life forces out there that will somehow step in and save us from ourselves.

237. gc Says:
August 27th, 2013 at 5:29 pm

This page still has the tsunami height map at the top. Why? It only served to (continue to)
confuse (see 6 comments up) and provide fodder for your detractors.

238. Fukushima: At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over
Says:
August 27th, 2013 at 11:23 pm

[...] Source of this article: CollapsingIntoConsciousness [...]

239. Merced Says:


August 27th, 2013 at 11:36 pm

Between this nuclear contamination, all the GMO foods, the EPAs allowance for higher
levels of glyphosate in Monsantos Round-Up (proven extremely hazardous for humans),
the only survivors will be those who grow their own food.

240. A Marine Biologist Says:


August 28th, 2013 at 1:56 am

Although this article does have error, I wanted to commend you for admitting that you
were wrong, as well as thank-you now, and in advance, for continuing to update the
article for accuracy and clarity. An overwhelming majority of the negative (and really
hateful) responses in the commentary pertain specifically to the inaccuracy map itself
unfortunately, most of you are spending far too much time excessively pointing out an
error the author already admitted to, and are missing the bigger picture- the global
pollution rate of our oceans increases every second. Furthermore, this contamination
includes radioactive waste which the authorities are either unable or refusing to
measure/investigate in order to asses the potential damage to ecosystem. I empathize with
those completely dismissing information as paranoia simply because you are oblivious
to reality. I am attaching an article from BBC News (so yeah, go ahead and argue with
one of the most respected and objective news sources in the world) where Dr Ken
Buesseler states, Our biggest concern right now is if some of the other isotopes, such as
strontium 90 which tend to be more mobile, get through these sediments in the ground
water. They are entering the oceans at levels that then will accumulate in seafood and will
cause new health concerns. Please take notice of the use of PRESENT tense in the last
sentence. I attained this information from a BBC article, which I am including a link to as
several others have done with various articles. I did not see this article already posted by
someone else, but if it is I apologize in advance. Moreover, whether you agree or disagree
with the article itself or the commentary of its readers, the most effective way to get your
point across is by posting a link that will back up your argument; otherwise, you have far
less credibility than the actual article you are bashing. Here are links to articles on
ABC.net(American), BBC.com (UK), and The Telegraph(UK). For any of you not
familiar with UK news reporting, both BBC and The Telegraph are extremely credible,
respected, and ACCURATE channels for news reporting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23779561

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-08/300-tonnes-of-radioactive-water-leaking-from-
fukushima-into-pac/4872482

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/10266309/Japanese-government-
to-take-over-Fukushima-nuclear-reactor.html

241. Sejan Blinker Says:


August 28th, 2013 at 9:31 am

The Fukujima incident its a catastrophic accident but, serously, its more dangerous that
previous nuclear incidents/experiments?
Remember that: (Wikipedia)
Over 2,000 nuclear explosions have been conducted, in over a dozen different sites
around the world.
The nuclear powers have conducted more than 2,000 nuclear test explosions (numbers
are approximated, as some test results have been disputed):
United States: 1,054 tests by official count (involving at least 1,151 devices, 331
atmospheric tests), most at Nevada Test Site and the Pacific Proving Grounds in the
Marshall Islands, with 10 other tests taking place at various locations in the United States,
including AmchitkaAlaska, Colorado, Mississippi, and New Mexico (see Nuclear
weapons and the United States for details).
Soviet Union: 715 tests (involving 969 devices) by official count, most at Semipalatinsk
Test Site and Novaya Zemlya, and a few more at various sites in Russia, Kazakhstan,
Turkmenistan, and Ukraine.
France: 210 tests by official count (50 atmospheric, 160 underground), four atomic
atmospheric tests at C.E.S.M. near Reggane, 13 atomic underground tests at C.E.M.O.
near In Ekker in the French Algerian Sahara, and nuclear atmospheric tests at Fangataufa
and nuclear undersea tests Moruroa in French Polynesia. Additional atomic and chemical
warfare tests took place in the secret base B2-Namous, near Ben Wenif, other tests
involving rockets and missiles at C.I.E.E.S, near Hammaguir, both in the Sahara.
United Kingdom: 45 tests (21 in Australian territory, including nine in mainland South
Australia at Maralinga and Emu Field, some atChristmas Island in the Indian Ocean, plus
many others in the United States at the Nevada Test Site as part of joint test series)
China: 45 tests (23 atmospheric and 22 underground, at Lop Nur Nuclear Weapons Test
Base, in Malan, Xinjiang)
India: Six underground tests (including the first one in 1974), at Pokhran
Pakistan: Six underground tests, at Ras Koh Hills, Chagai District and Kharan Desert,
Kharan District in Balochistan Province.
North Korea: Three underground tests at the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site
Total Atmospherics explosions: >400

242. Google Says:


August 28th, 2013 at 2:30 pm

Google

One of our visitors recently recommended the following website.

243. Erik Says:


August 28th, 2013 at 3:06 pm

His five points where he apparently has dug pretty deep to get to the real news that the
corporate-owned evening news dont get around to broadcasting have all been blown
out of proportion.

450 tons of water is nothing compared to the 7.15 x 10^15 displacement tons of water in
the pacific.

The open sores witnessed on polar bears and other sea animals are not consistent with
radiation burns, which cause erythemas, not ulcers

It does not come as a surprise that fukushima is unfit for living in, and will be so in the
forseeable future

A third more babies may indeed be born with hyperthyroidism, but this is an increase of
33 percent, not 33 percentage points. With the average amercian rate of hyperthyroidism
under 1% (http://www.freemd.com/hyperthyroidism/incidence.htm), this means at most
an increase to 1.33% on the west coast.

A doubling of the radiation, to a peak to 10 Bq means nothing. Homes have to be under


200 Bq legally be sold, and some basements have up to 1000 Bq (not that that is safe in
any way)
244. Jeff Says:
August 28th, 2013 at 7:27 pm

I prefer to believe this guy from Woods Hole:

http://www.surfingmagazine.com/blogs/the-scoop-radioactive-pacific/

At least he was willing to put his name on his opinion.

245. Furd Says:


August 28th, 2013 at 9:41 pm

Umm.. 300-450 tons of water is almost nothing about 10% of an Olympic swimming
pool or 0.000000000000001% of the ocean. You get more radiation from eating carrots
or bananas (and other high potassium and radium fruits & veggies) than that.

246. mg Says:
August 29th, 2013 at 9:00 am

Fact-checking can win or lose an ideological war; as a reader (and a liberal!) i look at this
article not knowing what information i can trust and thus not being able to come to my
own conclusions at all.

247. Keith Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 1:03 pm

Almost everything on this page is fabricated falsehood designed to incite fear. There is
absolutely zero quantitative data. Much of it is out and out lies. It is the dose that makes
the poison, folks. Doses to Americans from Fukushima are extraordinarily tiny compared
to even natural background. Its just fearmongering and the people who write such drivel
should be ashamed of themselves.

248. Linda Gordon Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 3:11 pm

One of my clients, who will remain unnamed, is a nuclear contractor for the military. I
asked him if it was true, what I read in the Alliance For Natural Health website, that the
radiation in California was over 700 times safe levels. His response wasoh, its MUCH
WORSE than that, it is over 1200 times safe levels from half way up Canada, to the
bottom of Baha, and California produce should not be eaten anymore, it istoo toxic. He
also informed me the worst of it was not making it over the Sierras and the Cascades, but
advised that it would be better to keep noving east, and stay away from California
produce.-Linda, renohealingmassage.com

249. Fukushima: Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over - The Illuminati |
New World Order Says:
August 29th, 2013 at 3:24 pm

[...] has to be amongst the worst that has happened in the past few decades. Gary Stamper,
a writer for Falling into Consciousness, has put together a great resource of information
that tracks what has been developing over time in [...]

250. jim g Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 5:04 pm

and, once again, the governments, and regulatory agencies, and the lamestream media do
nothing but alibi and cover up these problems. we need RADICAL change. in the USA,
both parties are hopelessly corrupt, bought and paid for. we need new ideas, leaders, and
direction. now.

251. Steve Broome Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 5:30 pm

While I do think that the situation is much worse than has been said theres a lot of
hyperbole in here that along with the fake map make it feel more like Michael Moore
specialties than a factual presentation. Also its a little silly to talk about how corporate
media wont cover something and then quote MSNBC, MSN, Huffington Post, etc.

252. Jan Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 7:16 pm

How very bizarre that so many people here are refusing to accept that there is and is
going to be a serious problem, particularly to marine life.

With or without the map, surely its common sense that a nuclear spill into the pacific is a
pretty serious matter?
Oh well, such is the state of humanity during my lifetime.

253. So Co Gal Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 7:21 pm

Keep up the good work, Gary.

Americans are asleep at the wheel and in an undeniable state of denial.


Look at the BP cover up sheeze.

And people worry about global warming as they sit in their gas gobbling oversized SUVs,
think impacting the environment is recycling toxic water bottles, turn their A/C down in
the summer and their heat up in the winter and think electric cars are a good thing but
coal is bad.

We need to be scared, mad, yelling at the top of lungs that the insanity has to stop.

Just wait until the Continental Grid Power down happens in November (as reported in the
NY Times 2 weeks ago in case all you CBS/NBC/ABC/FOX gobbling drones missed it)
and NORTH AMERICA is cut off from all communication, electricity, etc.

When they cant get on their iPhones, their mindless cable TV, their Candy Crush habits
MAYBE, just MAYBE a few of the brain dead will wake up and realize YOU ARE
BEING LIED TO.

Chernobal, 3 Mile Island, Weapons of Mass Destruction, FDA approved drugs recalled
because they KILL people, I could go on and on and on

Even if your info is slightly off, Gary, it is still spot on.

Keep on keepin on

254. Google Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 11:07 pm

Google

usually posts some pretty fascinating stuff like this. If you are new to this site

255. Alison Says:


August 29th, 2013 at 11:23 pm

Fukushima Radioactive Plume to Reach US in 3 Years


Aug. 28, 2013 The radioactive ocean plume from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear plant
disaster will reach the shores of the US within three years from the date of the incident
but is likely to be harmless according to new paper in the journal Deep-Sea Research 1.
While atmospheric radiation was detected on the US west coast within days of the
incident, the radioactive particles in the ocean plume take considerably longer to travel
the same distance.
In the paper, researchers from the Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science and
others used a range of ocean simulations to track the path of the radiation from the
Fukushima incident.
The models identified where it would likely travel through the worlds oceans for the
next 10 years.
Observers on the west coast of the United States will be able to see a measurable
increase in radioactive material three years after the event, said one of the papers
authors, Dr Erik van Sebille.
However, people on those coastlines should not be concerned as the concentration of
radioactive material quickly drops below World Health Organisation safety levels as soon
as it leaves Japanese waters.
Two energetic currents off the Japanese coast the Kuroshio Current and the Kurushio
Extension are primarily responsible for accelerating the dilution of the radioactive
material, taking it well below WHO safety levels within four months.
Eddies and giant whirlpools some tens of kilometres wide and other currents in the
open ocean continue this dilution process and direct the radioactive particles to different
areas along the US west coast.
Although some uncertainties remain around the total amount released and the likely
concentrations that would be observed, we have shown unambiguously that the contact
with the north-west American coasts will not be identical everywhere, said Dr. Vincent
Rossi.
Shelf waters north of 45N will experience higher concentrations during a shorter period,
when compared to the Californian coast. This late but prolonged exposure is due to the
three-dimensional pathways of the plume. The plume will be forced down deeper into the
ocean toward the subtropics before rising up again along the southern Californian shelf.
Interestingly, the great majority of the radioactive material will stay in the North Pacific,
with very little crossing south of the Equator in the first decade. Eventually over a
number of decades, a measurable but otherwise harmless signature of the radiation will
spread into other ocean basins, particularly the Indian and South Pacific oceans.
Australia and other countries in the Southern Hemisphere will see little if any
radioactive material in their coastal waters and certainly not at levels to cause concern,
Dr van Sebille said.
For those interested in tracking the path of the radiation, we have developed a website
(adrift.org.au) to help them.
Using this website, members of the public can click on an area in the ocean and track the
movement of the radiation or any other form of pollution on the ocean surface over the
next 10 years.
The above story is based on materials provided by University of New South Wales.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please
contact the source cited above.
________________________________________
Journal Reference:
Vincent Rossi, Erik Van Sebille, Alexander Sen Gupta, Vronique Garon, Matthew H.
England. Multi-decadal projections of surface and interior pathways of the Fukushima
Cesium-137 radioactive plume. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research
Papers, 2013; 80: 37 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2013.05.015 Surface (0200m) of Cesium-137
concentrations (Bq/m3) by (a)April 2012, (b) April 2014 (c) April 2016 and (d) April
2021. (Credit: Image courtesy of University of New South Wales)

256. Melodie Nguyen Says:


August 30th, 2013 at 6:05 am
Radioactive isotopes originating from the damaged Fukushimanuclear reactor in Japan
following the earthquake and tsunami inMarch 2011 were found in resident marine
animals and in migratory Pacic bluen tuna (PBFT). Publication of this information
resulted
in a worldwide response that caused public anxiety and concern, although PBFT captured
off California in August 2011 contained activity concentrations below those from
naturally occurring radionuclides. To link the radioactivity to possible health impairments,
we calculated doses, attributable to the Fukushima derived and the naturally occurring
radionuclides, to both the marine biota and human sh consumers. We showed that doses
in all cases were dominated by the naturally occurring alpha-emitter 210Po and that
Fukushima-derived doses were three to four orders of magnitude below 210 Po-derived
doses. Doses to marine biota were about two orders of magnitude below the lowest
benchmark protection level proposed for ecosystems (10 Gyh1). The additional dose
from
Fukushima radionuclides to humans consuming tainted PBFT in the United States was
calculated to be 0.9 and 4.7 Sv for average consumers and subsistenceshermen,
respectively. Such doses are
comparable to, or less than, the dose all humans routinely obtain from naturally occurring
radionuclides in many food items, medical treatments, air travel, or other background
sources. Although uncertainties remain regarding the assessment of cancer risk atlow
doses of ionizing radiation to humans, the dose received fromPBFT consumption by
subsistence shermen can be estimated to result in two additional fatal cancer cases per
10,000,000 similarly exposed people.
Source: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/30/1221834110.full.pdf+html

257. Fukushima: Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over Banoosh Says:
August 30th, 2013 at 6:23 am

[...] Stamper, a writer for Falling into Consciousness, has put together a great resource of
information that tracks what has been developing over time in [...]

258. Gasper Jack Says:


August 30th, 2013 at 10:03 am

Its sad that the first nations do not see or are taking the Fukishima disaster as a threat to
their health. This is okay with the USA and Canadian governments, we are considered a
burr to their efforts to gain full access to all resources and we are impeding their progress,
this is what the corporations that back the two governments prolly are thinking and
saying.

259. Fukushima: Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over | TIS Says:
August 30th, 2013 at 12:01 pm

[...] Stamper, a writer for Falling into Consciousness, has put together a great resource of
information that tracks what has been developing over time in [...]
260. Dana Thompson Says:
August 30th, 2013 at 5:26 pm

I TOLD YOU SO!!!

261. Fukushima: Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over | Revere Radio
Network Says:
August 31st, 2013 at 4:05 am

[...] Stamper, a writer for Falling into Consciousness, has put together a great resource of
information that tracks what has been developing over time in [...]

262. Ghostpo.st | Nuclear Meltdown. What Your Not Being Told. Says:
August 31st, 2013 at 8:23 pm

[...] Read the Article Here: Click Here [...]

263. Eating Champion Joey Chestnut Getting Dethroned Is Hard to Swallow |


Eating disorders simple treatments Says:
September 1st, 2013 at 8:36 am

[...] Read more [...]

264. John P. Says:


September 1st, 2013 at 5:40 pm

The most interesting thing I find in this story about the Japanese reactor and
contaminated water is this. The USA has suffered from any number of years from our use
of nuclear weapons in WWII and the harm we caused.

Isnt it ironic that they caused similar damage to themslves?!

265. At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific ... Says:
September 2nd, 2013 at 7:24 am

[...] It now appears that anywhere from 300 to possibly over 450 tons of contaminated
water that contains radioactive iodone, cesium, and strontium-89 and 90, is flooding into
the Pacific Ocean from the Fukushima Daichi site everyday. [...]

266. Hydraulic fracturing responsible for mass fish deaths: USGS | Healthy skin
simple tips Says:
September 2nd, 2013 at 2:21 pm

[...] Read more [...]


267. may i ask you Says:
September 3rd, 2013 at 9:00 am

So all i want to know is can i eat fish!!!!! Any one know if it will harm New Zealand
waters???

268. Protecting Yourself and Your Loved Ones From Radiation by Gary Stamper |
Collapsing Into Consciousness Says:
September 4th, 2013 at 9:54 am

[...] amounts of radiation or why that happens. Ive made that case in numerous other
blogs, here and here, for example. There are lots people who disagree with my
conclusions and they are free to [...]

269. Food Irradiation Research and Technology | HEALTHCARE Says:


September 8th, 2013 at 2:38 am

[...] At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over [...]

270. Food Irradiation Research and Technology | HEALTHCARE Says:


September 8th, 2013 at 2:38 am

[...] At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over [...]

271. Jamie Says:


September 9th, 2013 at 9:09 pm

I am as concerned about the radiation leak as anyone, but leaving your flawed graphic up
is irresponsible and just shows that you are more worried about getting publicity than that
facts. Weaksauce.

272. At the Very Least | Bill Totten's Weblog Says:


September 10th, 2013 at 12:04 pm

[...] {21} http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/at-the-very-least-your-days-of-


eating-pacific-ocean-fish- [...]

273. Glennie Odell Says:


September 12th, 2013 at 4:34 pm

Jackeline

nice
274. brian Says:
September 13th, 2013 at 4:44 pm

nice! Why is noone talking about it!?!


lets get sick silently, we have obamacare!!

275. Andy Gibson Says:


September 15th, 2013 at 9:24 am

Brian has asked why no-one is talking about it. The same questions could be asked with
the commercial sporting extravaganza September decision: The Olympic Committee Is
Mistress To The Nuclear Industry as exposed by Yoichi Shimatsu (a former editor of the
Japan Times Weekly in Tokyo) as reported in Rense.
http://www.rense.com/general96/olymm.html

276. stefan Says:


September 17th, 2013 at 11:48 am

A friend of mine used your graphic radiation in several speeches, explaning what
danger goes all over the world from Fukushima. You still have this graphic named
radiation online. On aug. 16th you say that you did not know that this shows not
radiation but the wave height of the tsunami. Sorry to say, but if you do not understand,
that cm is no unit for radiation, you should not pubish anything about this. 39,000
visitors per day show that the damage you cause to the environmental idea and necessary
spiritual cange is very big! I appreciate your motivation very much, but it would be better
not to publish wrong or half true information. Sorry for my bad english.

277. Gary Stamper Says:


September 17th, 2013 at 3:06 pm

I appreciate your comment, Stefan, but in the image I posted, I could not read the the very
small chart on the image. It appeared on so many other sites as authentic, I assumed it
was. My bad. Also, I dont agree that the article should not have been published. The
viral quality raised a LOT of peoples awareness. Your English is fine.

278. Yk Says:
September 19th, 2013 at 9:00 am

So Says the naive American. I was just in Japan and their fish was absolutely fine.
Perhaps your focus should be on why you self proclaimed greatest nation in the world
cant have the same quality of life as Japan or Korea. Coming home to the states makes
me realize how third world, undeveloped and uncultured Americans really are.
279. Gary Stamper Says:
September 19th, 2013 at 3:58 pm

Im curious, Ykwith all these experts saying otherwise, how do you know the fish was
fine, even as some Japanese scientists are issuing warnings and Korea bans the
importation of Japanese-caught fish? Are they naive? Did you bring your own
professionally calibrated gieger counter with you? The ones that take several hours to
give a full range of readings? and you call me naive? As for the last part of your rant, Im
not disagreeing with you, there, and its obvious youre not reading my writings. Please
try to bring a nuanced and informed perspective to your comments.

280. SS Says:
September 20th, 2013 at 2:28 pm

Ask a Japanese person. Its all fine! Theres absolutely nothing wrong at all. It was just
like a minor, insignificant .. nothing.. that happened that people are freaking out about.
lol

281. Fukushima | Lottas ullisar Says:


September 22nd, 2013 at 2:25 pm

[] More on Fukushima http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/at-the-very-least-


your-days-of-eating-pacific-ocean-fish-… []

282. Theres something fishy going on... - foodness for goodness sake Says:
September 24th, 2013 at 6:29 am

[] articles written about this very serious issue and yes it has been reported that
radiation in the Pacific Ocean is heading to Australia. Now I am not one for scare-
mongering but I have been reading a lot of []

283. Fukushima Disaster Reaches Epic Proportions | spiritandanimal.wordpress.com


Says:
September 27th, 2013 at 8:06 am

[] Consuming cesium-tainted fish is probably about to be one of your least


concerns. Most of us were already aware of the generalities of Fukushimas defunct
nuclear reactor seeping tons of toxic and radioactive iodone, cesium, and strontium-89
and 90 into the Pacific Ocean. We perhaps said a prayer and vowed to start consuming
fish from other oceans. Now, there is news of Fukushimas damaged Unit 4 pool, that
a Yale professor warns is in perilous danger and could threaten all of humanity for
thousands of years. []

284. Gary Stamper Says:


September 27th, 2013 at 11:24 am
Several readers sent us this quote from another article. Well worth noting.

285. Jack Schick Says:


September 28th, 2013 at 1:45 am

Gary,
I imagine you will get more hits like me, coming from a reply to an enenews.com article.
obewanspeaks is one of the most aware commenters. I know you have moved on to new
writings, but it is so important for
us to refute the pompous better educated windbags who are just plain wrong. Fuku has
not decreased in radioactive output at all, in two-and-a-half years; rather, the truth is that
daily observations by webcam-watchers, able to also monitor seismic info, have seen
huge plumes of superheated gases blasting directly into the air, cranes fallen over, and the
true facts recorded, in the face of worldwide lying corp media. These uninformed people
wishing to counter-speak the Truth need only go to
enenews dot com, prepared to seriously READ.

I was worried, Gary, that you were avoiding mention of enenews.com for some reason.
Rains, falling constantly across the Pacific, have added more and more FALLOUT to the
east-bound currents. No Radiation Releases have been Abated, nor curbed, nor decreased,
nor deflected. It is a Constant Blast Furnace of superheated, deadly radioactive gas,
forced high, into the upper atmosphere, into the jet stream. Fukushima is the End
foreshadowed by Chernobyl.

Gary, did you know that the word Chernobyl is the direct translation of Wormwood,
that word seen in Biblical Prophecy? Please go to Jeremiah 9, and remember as you read
the chapter, replace Wormwood with Chernobyl, and appreciate the Most High. We
were told clear back then! It is Chilling! Are folks even educated enough to know about
the Chernobyl permanent Exclusion Zone? TV show: Radioactive Wolves mentioned
the old Jewish trading port of Chernobyl, on the river It was named for the
Wormwood trees, a type of Artemisia tree commonly called the Wormwood forest in
Ukraine. Jeremiah 9Chernobyl = Wormwood, and now we KNOW Fukushima is the
next level of death, an extension of the Prophecy of Wormwood. Dont eat the fish. Bible
warned you about it. into ground-and-seawater

286. Gary Stamper Says:


September 28th, 2013 at 3:40 pm

Jack, youre not paying attention. I published an article from ENENEWS on the 26th, the
day before you offered your comment.

It is interesting to hear current events interpreted from your worldview. Its not that
youre wrong about whats happening, but why its happening, but the causes and the
reasons, look different at every worldview. Youve taken a very traditionalist perspective,
assigning Biblical explanations.
By the way, the word wormwood is not in the King James version. I did find this,
however, and thought it interesting:

In the Revelation of Christ given to John we find a most intriguing prophecy often used
to suggest that some kind of heavenly body will crash into the earth and do great damage.
The prophecy describes this as a great star named Wormwood. Lets examine this
concept in light of biblical support.

Rev 8:10-11 And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven,
burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the
fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and many men
died of the waters, because they were made bitter.

As for Chernobyl equating with Wormwood, A number of Bible scholars consider the
term Wormwood to be a purely symbolic representation of the bitterness that will fill the
earth during troubled times, noting that the plant for which Wormwood is named,
Artemisia absinthium, or Mugwort, Artemisia vulgaris, is a known Biblical metaphor for
things that are unpalatably bitter. One interesting theory is that nuclear weaponry could
be called wormwood. For example: Ukrainian synonymy wormwood. They do poison
the water where they are detonated, thus explaining the correlation. Some[12] even point
to the Chernobyl disaster as a possible fulfillment of this prophecy, as the name
Chernobyl is said to translate to wormwood. source, wikipedia, not the most reliable.

287. Brenda Fogle Says:


October 1st, 2013 at 2:36 pm

Thank you.

288. bob Says:


October 2nd, 2013 at 8:48 pm

guys you do know that this is fake right?

289. Gary Stamper Says:


October 2nd, 2013 at 9:15 pm

Cmon, Bobsuch an easy thing to say, but you dont back it up. Classic Fuku-Denier.

290. Robert Says:


October 3rd, 2013 at 12:28 pm
I honestly think that this guy needs to actually study what he is talking about this falls
under the category of Journalism should be labelled with warning, fool doesnt know
what they are talking about and any credit may induce mass hysteria

Seriously, I can see your train of thought going along Oh well our government wont
test for this because it would be an insult to the Japanese, our longtime economic ally,
and hence they put our safety behind the international relations This is because this
would go against their big corporate donors

God such a fucking nut!

291. Gary Stamper Says:


October 3rd, 2013 at 2:04 pm

Another intellectual giant with nothing to back up what you say, but your email address
says it all: @gof***yourself.now? Really?

292. At the Very Least, Your Days of Eating Pacific Ocean Fish Are Over with
updates | Hf-day Says:
October 5th, 2013 at 11:03 am

[] http://www.collapsingintoconsciousness.com/at-the-very-least-your-days-of-eating-
pacific-ocean-fish-… []

293. Christine Pombo Says:


October 5th, 2013 at 10:29 pm

What about Atlantic Fish? Fish from rivers like farm raised Idaho trout ?? Or should we
give up fish altogether?
I need to know how to proceed for my own health and what to pass on to loved ones and
community!
Thanks!
I look forward to a comment Thanks again!

Вам также может понравиться