Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Group: GE3
Date of submission:
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1
AIM OF EXPERIMENT............................................................................................................1
BACKGROUND THEORY.......................................................................................................1
Castiglianos Theorem............................................................................................................1
APPARATUS USED..................................................................................................................6
PROCEDURE............................................................................................................................6
Semi-circular bar:...................................................................................................................6
TABLE OF RESULTS...............................................................................................................7
b) Quadrant..........................................................................................................................8
c) Davit-shaped bar.............................................................................................................8
ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................9
Graphs....................................................................................................................................9
CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................13
APPENDIX..............................................................................................................................14
Appendix I............................................................................................................................14
Appendix II..........................................................................................................................14
Appendix III.........................................................................................................................16
INTRODUCTION
Curved bars are not practically used on their own but are usually combined with other
elements of different shapes and sizes. The behaviour of such members when a load is
applied should therefore be considered an important factor to consider. Thus, experiments
have to be carried out so as to approximate the deflection of a curved member in loading.
Deflection can be calculated by standard formula or by methods such as virtual work, double
integration method, Castigliano's method, method of superposition or the area-moment
method, among others.
In this experiment, we will use the Castiglianos method in order to calculate the deflections
of the provided curved bars. Castiglianos method is based on the concept of strain energy of
a particular structure and the conditions where it is applicable is when the supports of the
structure are unyielding and the temperature of the structure is constant.
AIM OF EXPERIMENT
The aim of this experiment is to verify experimentally the deflection of curved bars, having
small cross-sectional dimensions compared with the radius of the bars centre line. The three
structural elements are as follows:
BACKGROUND THEORY
Castiglianos Theorem
Castiglianos theorem states that the deflection caused by any external load is equal to the
partial differential of the strain energy with respect to that external load. At every point of
action of these forces there are deflections. The following expression can be used to represent
Castiglianos Theorem:
L
M2 (Equation 1)
Strain Energy , U= dx
0 2 EI
1|Page
E is modulus of rigidity of material
Equation 1 can then be solved and reduced so as to obtain an expression for deflection, x
which is stated as Equation 2 below:
L
U M M
=
x= P 0 EI P dx (Equation 2)
1. Semi-Circular bar
Consider the Figure 1 below; all the factors involved in the loading of a semi-circular bar is
shown. The force of loading is represented by P and the radius of curvature as R.
M = PR sin (Equation 3)
M
=R sin
Pv (Equation 4)
2|Page
And for horizontal displacements;
1cos
M (Equation 5)
=R
Pv
So, replacing Equations 3,4 and 5 in the general equation for displacement (Equation 2),
gives Equation 6 for vertical displacements and Equation 7 for horizontal displacements;
xv = PRsin Rsin
EI
Rd
0
P R3
xv = EI 0
sin 2 d
3
P R
xv = 2 EI (Equation 6)
Similar steps are followed to obtain the displacements in the horizontal directions, except that
in order to solve the integral in the horizontal direction, a dummy load is applied. (Denoted as
H in Figure 1) It is just an imaginary force applied to the system and will later be replaced by
zero.
1cos
M =PRsin+ HR
The above equations are then replaced in Equation 2 which results to Equation 7.
3|Page
PR sin + HR (1cos )
1cos
xH = Rd
sin sin cos
xH = d
P R3
EI 0
3
2 PR
xH = EI (Equation
7)
The equations for vertical and horizontal displacements for a quadrant shaped bar are derived
in a very similar way as for the semi-circular shape. The only thing that is going to change is
the limits of the integrals, which will from /2 to 0 instead of to 0.
/2
xv = PRsin Rsin
EI
Rd
0
4|Page
3 /2
PR
xv = EI
sin 2 d
0
P R3
xv = 4 EI (Equation 8)
PR sin + HR (1cos )
1cos
xH = Rd
/2
sin sin cos
xH = d
/2
P R3
EI 0
P R3
xH = 2 EI (Equation 9)
3. Davit-Shaped bar
For the davit-shaped bar, the derivations will be a bit different due to the fact that there is
both a quadrant and a straight part. Both of these shapes will be considered separately and
added together to give the final equations for vertical and horizontal displacements.
For the quadrant part, the vertical and horizontal displacements are given by Equation 8 and
9. ( Derivations shown above)
P R3
xv = 4 EI (Equation 8)
5|Page
3
PR
xH = 2 EI (Equation 9)
For vertical displacement, M = PR and the limit of the integral is L to 0. ( Where L is the
length of the straight part). Replacing in Equation 2 and adding to Equation 8, results in
Equation 10:
L
P R3
xv = 4 EI
+ PREIR dy
0
P R3 P R2 L
+
xv = 4 EI EI (Equation 10)
For horizontal displacement, again we make use of the dummy load H, in order to find the
solution of the integral. Then, the moment M becomes
M= PR + H(R+y)
The limit is again from L to 0. Thus, the equation for horizontal displacement is given by
Equation 11;
L
P R3 ( PR+ H ( R+ y ))( R+ y )dy
xH = 2 EI
+ EI
0
P R3 PRL (2 R+ L)
+
xH = 2 EI 2 EI (Equation
11)
6|Page
R
All the equations obtained above are summarised in Table 1 below. The equations which can
be used as approximations have also been included in the table.
P R3 0.5 P R3 0.48 P R3
Quadrant 4 EI EI EI
3 2 3 3
P R P R L P R PRL (2 R+ L) 0.48 P R PRL( 2 R+ L)
Davit + + +
4 EI EI 2 EI 2 EI EI 2 EI
Where
P Load applied
R Radius
I Moment of inertia
7|Page
L-Straight length of davit shaped bar
APPARATUS USED
PROCEDURE
Semi-circular bar:
1. The hanger is attached onto the semi-circular bar and a 2 N weight is added on it. The
latter serves to stabilise the system.
2. The removable dials are secured onto the semi-circle experimental setup and are then
used to measure the horizontal and vertical displacements.
3. The two dials are set to zero and the zero-datum reading is recorded.
4. The member is then loaded with weights from the range 2N to 20N. The weight
increments are chosen to be 2 N and a set of 10 readings are recorded in Table 2.
5. In order to obtain the deflections, the zero-datum reading is subtracted from the actual
readings.
The same procedures as for the semi-circular bar are repeated for both the quadrant and the
davit-shaped bar and the results are recorded in Tables 3 and 4 respectively.
TABLE OF RESULTS
Vertical Horizontal
Dial Deflection ( 0.01 Dial Deflection ( 0.01
Load (N)
reading mm) reading mm)
2 9.69 0.00 10.35 0.00
4 9.70 0.01 9.35 1.00
8|Page
8 10.9 1.21 8.01 2.34
9 10.9 1.21 7.62 2.73
10 11.49 1.80 5.97 4.38
12 12.55 2.86 3.44 6.91
14 12.98 3.29 2.83 7.52
16 14.44 4.75 0.33 10.02
18 14.06 4.37 0.17 10.18
20 14.1 4.41 - -
b) Quadrant
Vertical Horizontal
Dial Deflection ( 0.01 Dial Deflection ( 0.01
Load (N)
reading mm) reading mm)
2 9.36 0.00 4.22 0.00
4 9.09 0.27 5.50 1.28
8 8.84 0.52 5.65 1.43
9 8.61 0.75 5.76 1.54
10 8.31 1.05 5.92 1.70
12 8.03 1.33 6.13 1.91
14 7.76 1.60 6.28 2.06
16 7.55 1.81 6.42 2.20
18 7.27 2.09 6.62 2.40
20 7.06 2.30 6.92 2.70
c) Davit-shaped bar
Vertical Horizontal
Dial Deflection ( 0.01 Dial Deflection ( 0.01
Load (N)
reading mm) reading mm)
2 7.81 0.00 9.7 0.00
4 7.45 0.36 10.01 0.31
8 7.02 0.79 10.03 0.33
9 6.59 1.22 10.72 1.02
10 5.99 1.82 11.32 1.62
12 5.57 2.24 11.97 2.27
9|Page
14 5.16 2.65 12.21 2.51
16 4.69 3.12 12.34 2.64
18 4.28 3.53 12.03 2.33
20 3.85 3.96 13.03 3.33
ANALYSIS
All three members were made from (25 mm 5 mm) steel strips. The Youngs modulus of
the material is E = 205 GPa.
1. For each of the three members, the graphs of load P against deflection were plotted.
Both the vertical and horizontal components of deflection were plotted on separate
graphs for each member.
2. Straight line curve fits were added to the plotted data points
Graphs
10
8 Vertical Deflection
Linear (Vertical Deflection)
6 Horizontal Deflection
Deflection (mm)
Linear (Horizontal
4
Deflection)
2
0
2 4 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20
Load (N)
10 | P a g e
(b) Quadrant
2.5
2 Vertical Deflection
Linear (Vertical Deflection)
1.5 Horizontal Deflection
Deflection (mm)
Linear (Horizontal
1
Deflection)
0.5
0
2 4 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20
Load (N)
11 | P a g e
Deflection against Load
4.5
4
3.5
3 Vertical Deflection
2.5 Horizontal Deflection
Deflection (mm) 2 Linear (Horizontal
1.5 Deflection)
1
0.5
0
2 4 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20
Load (N)
3. Using table 1, the exact and the approximate deflections for the tested members were
found.
NOTE: Refer to appendix for calculations done in this part of the report.
The exact and the approximate deflections for the tested members were found as per the
following (From appendix II):
12 | P a g e
4. The approximate theoretical results were compared with the deflections cross-
referenced off the graphs obtained at step 1 of the analysis section (see Table 5)
Table 5. Showing the comparison between the theoretical results and the deflections cross-
referenced off the graphs
5. The percentage errors were provided for each of these values and presented in
Table 6 (see appendix III for calculations of percentage error).
Table 6. Showing the percentage error for each of the values
13 | P a g e
Exact 0.00169 4.14
Horizontal 0.00162
Approximate 0.00166 2.37
CONCLUSION
It can be observed that, from the results obtained, large errors were induced in finding the
deflections of the quadrant-form bar. For the semi-circular bar, only some errors were
induced and minimum errors were found for the davit-shaped bar.
It can thus be concluded that this experiment can only be used to measure the deflections of
the semi-circle and the davit-shaped rod. The errors obtained may have been due to the dial
indicator. More accurate results could be obtained upon use of better apparatus.
14 | P a g e
APPENDIX
Appendix I
bh3
I=
12
3
( 25 103 ) ( 5 103 )
12
10 4
2.6041 10 m
Appendix II
( 8 ) ( 0.20 )3
2 ( 205 10 9 )( 2.6041 1010 )
3
1.8831 10
Horizontal deflection
2 PR 3
Horizontal deflection=
EI
15 | P a g e
2 ( 8 ) ( 0.20 )3
( 205 109 ) ( 2.6041 1010 )
2.3977 103
3
PR
Vertical deflection=
4 EI
( 8 ) ( 0.20 )3
4 ( 205 10 9 )( 2.6041 1010 )
4
9.4158 10
0.5 ( 8 ) ( 0.20 )3
( 205 109 ) ( 2.6041 1010 )
5.9942 104
0.48 ( 8 ) ( 0.20 )3
( 205 109 ) ( 2.6041 1010 )
5.7544 104
16 | P a g e
3 2
PR PR L
Vertical deflection= +
4 EI EI
1.9262 103
1.6858 103
3
1.6559 10
Appendix III
|V 2V 1|
Percentage error= 100
Theoretical V
|0.001210.00188|
100
0.00188
17 | P a g e
0.00067
100
0.00188
35.64
18 | P a g e