Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
India is standing on the threshold of a retail revolution and witnessing fast changing retail
scenario, with footwear market set to experience phenomenal growth in the coming years.
The entry of numerous international players has also resulted in providing a significant boost
to the Indian footwear market and the demand for Indian footwear will continue to grow in
future as well, says our recent report, Indian Footwear Market Forecast 2014.
At present, Indian footwear industry rank second-largest footwear producer after China. Our
study has effectively monitored the current and future trend of the Indian footwear market on
the basis of which, it is considered to possess a significant potential with overall market
anticipated to grow at a CAGR of around 14% during 2012-2014. The market is de-licensed,
which further creates expansion opportunities for the production capacities in modern state-
of-the-art units.
Our research highlights that, the success mantras for footwear market in India lies in the core
set of privileges existing in the country itself, including low labor cost, skilled working
professionals, etc. The footwear industry in India is presently witnessing various shifts in the
trends that are indicative of contributing in the future growth of the industry. For instance,
many companies in the market are dealing in a range of stylish eco-friendly footwear to
ensure that the buyers do not sacrifice on comfort or style, while opting for green shoes.
Similarly, more and more people are now opting for custom-made or designer footwear
providing opportunities for footwear designers.
Indian footwear industry is mainly driven by mens footwear segment, which has been
booming with the rise in the purchasing power and the growth of image consciousness among
the youngsters. Furthermore, with the rising younger working class population, the demand
for formal footwear has also seen significant increase. Whereas, the old-age group demand
for medical footwear that offers comfort and health benefits together with high quality. The
report also analyze that with the maximum population still living in rural areas, the demand
for footwear is increasing in these regions. Rising income level of the people and brand
awareness has further boosted the demand for premium footwear.
The report intends to facilitate clients with a clear understanding of the present and future
outlook of the footwear market and developments in the country. A detailed analysis of the
business trend of national and international competitors also tends to portray a clear picture of
the business in India. A section on regulatory initiatives opted by the government has also
been provided in the report to facilitate clients with a proper understanding of the Indian
footwear market. Above all, the study also evaluates various strategies that will boost the
footwear market in India.
Domestic Players:
BATA:
Bata India is the largest company for the Bata Shoe Organization in terms of sales pairs and
the second largest in terms of revenues. With 1250 stores across the country, it also has the
widest retail network within the BSO. By the time Bata had come to India in 1931, it was
already recognized as a leading shoe brand. Its manufacturing and marketing operations
heralded the rise and the development of a modern footwear industry in India. Before Bata,
footwear was produced primarily in the handicrafts and small enterprise segments. Bata, over
the decades, used the current knowledge' from its international experience to create adaptive
and innovative baseline standards for the shoe businesses in India. Incorporated as Bata Shoe
Company Private Limited in 1931, the company was set up initially a small operation in
Konnagar (near Calcutta) in 1932. In January 1934, the foundation stone for the first building
of Bata's operation - now called the Bata. In the years that followed, the overall lsite was
doubled in area. This township is popularly known as Batanagar. It was also the first
manufacturing facility in the Indian shoe industry to receive the ISO: 9001 certification.
The Company went public in 1973 when it changed its name to Bata India Limited. Today,
Bata India has established itself as one of Asia's largest footwear retailer. It has cornered
Liberty:-
Liberty Shoes Ltd. is the only Indian company that is among the top 5 manufacturers of
leather footwear in the world with a turnover exceeding U.S. $100 million. Company
produces more than 50,000 pairs of footwear a day covering virtually every age group and
income category. Products are marketed across the globe through 150 distributors,
350exclusive showrooms and over 6000 multi-brand outlets, and sold in thousands every day
in more than 25 countries including fashion-driven, quality-obsessed nations like France,
Italy, and Germany.
Liberty has developed a spectrum of 10 exclusive brands, each of which has been given that
extra edge to cater to a specific target group. Today, the new range from Liberty is all about
style, design, and comfort. The range imbibes the spirit of fun and is trendy to the core.
Liberty has something for every occasion, for every income bracket & every age group.
It pampers its customer by keeping pace with global footwear fashion trends and by going
Global Market:
Adidas:-
Adidas Ltd. is a major German sports apparel manufacturer and part of the Adidas Group,
which consists of Reebok sportswear company, Taylor Made- Adidas golf company, and
Rockport Besides sports footwear, the company also produces other products such as bags,
shirts, and other sports and clothing related goods. The company is the largest sportswear
manufacturer in Europe and the second largest sportswear manufacturer in the world. The
following table shows the revenue of the company from the year 2005 to 2009. And it is seen
that the revenue of the company is increasing.
Adidas today, is manufacturing different style of shoes used for different purposes by
many people. Whether it is running, playing or walking Adidas provides shoes for every
different activity. Adidas currently manufactures several running shoes, including the adiStar
Control 5, the adiStar Ride, the Supernova Sequence, and the Supernova Cushi, among
others. In addition, their performance apparel is widely used by runners. Adidas also uses
kangaroo leather to make their more expensive shoes. One of the main focuses of Adidas is
football kit and associated equipment. Adidas also provides apparel and equipment for all
teams in Major League Soccer. Adidas remain a major company in the supply of team kits for
international football teams. Adidas also designs and makes clothes, sandals, watches,
eyewear, bags, baseball caps, and socks. As well, Adidas has a branded range of male and
female deodorants, perfumes, aftershave and lotions.
Nike:-
Nike, Inc. is a major publicly traded sportswear and equipment supplier based in the United
States. The company is headquartered in the Portland metropolitan area of Oregon,
23 be 30% lighter than their competitors'. In 2008, Nike introduced the Air Jordan XX3, a
high performance basketball shoe designed with the environment in mind. Nike sells an
assortment of products, including shoes and apparel for sports activities like association
football, basketball, running, combat sports, tennis, American football, athletics, golf and
cross training for men, women, and children. Nike also sells shoes for outdoor activities such
as tennis, golf, skateboarding, association football, baseball, American football, cycling,
volleyball, wrestling, cheerleading, aquatic activities, auto racing and other athletic andre
creational uses. Nike is well known and popular in youth culture, chav culture and hip hop
Reebok:-
Reebok International Limited is a producer of athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories and
is currently a subsidiary of Adidas. The name comes from the Afrikaans spelling of rhebok, a
type of African antelope or gazelle. The company, founded in Bolton, United Kingdom, in
1895, was originally called J.W. FOSTER & SONS but was renamed Reebok in 1958. The
company's founders, Joe and Jeff Foster, found the name in a dictionary won in a race by Joe
Foster as a boy; the dictionary was a South African edition, hence the spelling. Reebok surged
in popularity in 1982 after the introduction of the Freestyle athletic shoe, which was designed
for women and came out when the aerobics craze started. Not only was the Reebok Freestyle
popular as athletic wear, but also as casual wear. As a result the Freestyle became an icon of
the 1980s fashion scene with hi-top versions (including two velcro straps at the top) and
colors, including white, black, red, yellow, and blue. Reebok continues to produce the Free
styleas it is popular with cheerleading, aerobic dancing, the gym and consumers. Footwear
Reebok uses footwear factories in 14 countries. Most factories making Reebok footwear are
based in Asiaprimarily China (accounting for 51% of total footwear production),Indonesia
(21%), Vietnam (17%) and Thailand (7%). Production is consolidated, with 88% of Reebok
footwear manufactured in 11 factories, employing over 75,000 workers. Apparel Reebok has
factories in 45 countries. The process of purchasing products from suppliersis organized by
region. Most (52%) of Reebok's apparel sold in the US is produced in Asia, with the rest
coming from countries in the Caribbean, North America, Africa and the Middle East. Apparel
sold in Europe is typically sourced from Asia and Europe. Apparel sold in the Asia Pacific
region is typically produced by Asian-based manufacturers
Apache Footwear India Private Limited Was established In 2006 With More Than 6000
Employees And We Are The Manufacturer Of Ladies Foot wears, Men Foot wears, Kids Foot
wears, Leather Shoes, Sport Shoes.
Supplier and manufacturer of shoes, sports shoes, leather shoe exporter of slippers, shoes,
belly, sandals
Apache Footwear India Private Limited, which supplies to footwear major adidas, is keen on
setting up two satellite units in the state to enhance its production capacity in line with the
expected increase in orders from Adidas, according to Andrew Chen, representing Apache
Footwear group (Hong Kong).
Apache, which has its manufacturing operations on the 314-acre special economic zone in
Mambattu village in Nellore, is planning to raise its footwear manufacturing capacity in one
year to 500,000 from the present 350,000 pairs per month. The company currently employs
around 5,000 workers at its Nellore facility, he said.
A five-member delegation from Apache Footwear group on 2006 called on chief minister YS
Rajasekhara Reddy and briefed about the company's plans in the state. Reddy offered to
support companys operations for creating employment opportunities.
AIM:
Winter slippers
Winter sandals
We are offering our customers a quality range of winter sandals. These sandals are
manufactured from qualitative range of raw materials. These sandals are offered in variety of
designs, shapes, sizes and colours. Our assortment of sandals is available at most reasonable
prices
Our customers can avail from us an excellent quality range of Winter EVA Clogs. These
Winter EVA Clogs are available in various sizes and specifications. Our Winter EVA Clogs
can be customized as per our customers specifications and it can be availed at most
reasonable price. 1. Size: 36-41#,40-45# 2.
Material: EVA Upper + EVA Sole 3. Color: A...
Beaded ladies slippers
We have earned a reputation of dignified manufacturer, exporter and supplier of excellent
quality Beaded Ladies Slippers . These slippers are designed using optimum quality raw
materials as per the industry quality standards. Offered slippers are subjected to the
stringent quality test under the observation of our dexterous professionals. Design...
Men floaters
We are engaged in supplying and wholesaling a vast range of Men Floaters. These sandals are
manufactured by using superior quality material in accordance with the latest market trends.
These floaters are offered in various colors, sizes and design to meet the client needs. Our
products are highly demanded by the clients for their beautiful designs,...
Human resource management (HRM) is the strategic and coherent approach to the
management of an organization's most valued assets - the people working there who
individually and collectively contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the business
2. Welfare aspect-It deals with working conditions, facilities and amenities such as canteens,
rest and lunch rooms, housing, transport, medical assistance, education, health and safety,
recreation facilities, etc.
Functions of HRM:
Objective functions
Managerial functions are also called the core functionalities of human resource
management, which will be deals with the planning, organizing, Directing and, Controlling.
Among these directing is also called the leading.
Objective functions are the active functionalities of human resource management which has
substantially organizing capability in according to requirements of the organization. These are
drawn from the managerial functions for successful achievement of the organizational tasks.
These includes the...
Employee planning.
Staffing.
Training and Development.
Employee evolution.
Pay roll management.
Welfare of the employee.
Employee evolution is the major task for an organization because employee performance will
be done and motivation factor to the extent of the employee requirement. It includes the
Conducting the performance appraisal, feedback generation, giving the extra inputs that
requires for the employee, compensation planning, Reviewing and auditing manpower
management in the organization etc.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Organizational objectives
Day-to-day performance
Professional development
Making and validating administrative decisions like pay, promotion, placement, and
termination.etc.
Identifying systemic factors that are barriers to, or facilitators of, effective
The history of performance appraisal is quite brief. Its roots in early 20 th century can
be traced to Taylors pioneering Time and Motion studies. But this is not very helpful, for the
same may be said about almost everything in field of modern human resources management.
For example, early motivational researchers were aware that different people with
roughly equal work abilities could be paid the same amount of money and yet have quite
different levels of motivation and performance.
These observations were confirmed in empirical studies. Pay rates were important,
yes; but they were not the only element that had an impact on employee performance. It was
found that other issues, such as morale and self- esteem, could also have a major influence.
In many organizations but not all appraisal result are used, either directly or
indirectly, to help determine reward outcomes. That is, the appraisal result is used to identify
the better performing employees who should get the majority of available merit pay
increases, bonuses, and promotions.
By the same token, appraisal results are used to identify the poorer performance that
may require some form of counselling, or in extreme causes, demotion, dismissal or
decreases in pay. (Organizations to be aware of laws in their country that might restrict their
capacity to dismiss employees or decreases pay).
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
An organizations goals can be achieved only when people put in their best efforts.
How-to ascertain whether and employee has shown his or her best performance on a given
job? The answer is performance appraisal. Employee assessment is one of the fundamental
jobs of HRM. But not an easy one though. This chapter is devoted to a detailed discussion of
the nature and process of conducting performance appraisal.
It is the systematic evaluation of the individual with respect to his or her performance
on the job and his or her potential for development.
Definitions
The second definition includes employees behaviour as part of the assessment. Behaviour
can be active or passive-do something or do nothing. Either way behaviour affects job results.
The other terms used for performance appraisals are: performance rating, employee
assessment. Employees performance review, personal appraisal, performance evaluation,
employee evaluation and (perhaps the oldest of the terms used) merit rating. In a formal
sense; it is probably as old as mankind. Nor performance appraisal is done in isolation. It is
linked to job analysis as shown in
Provide information about the performance ranks basing on which decisions regarding
salary fixation, conformation, promotion, transfer etc.
Provide feedback information about the levels of achievements and behaviour of
subordinate. This information helps to review the performance of the subordinate,
rectifying performance deficiencies and to set new standards of work, if necessary.
Provide information to diagnose deficiency in employee regarding skills, knowledge,
determine training and developmental needs and to prescribe the means for employee
growth provides information for correcting placement.
3. Increases mutuality between each employee and his superior and strengthen
relationships.
i. Developmental uses
To contribute the employee growth and development through training, self and
management development programs.
Development needs.
Promotion
Retention or termination
Lay-offs
Evaluation of HR systems
Reinforcement of organizational
development needs
Traditional methods
Modern methods
TRADITIONAL METHODS
The traditional method lay emphasis on the rating on the individuals personality
traits, such as initiative, dependability, drive, responsibility, creativity, integrity, leadership
potential, intelligence, judgement, organization ability etc.
Grading
Checklist
Critical Incidents
Group appraisal
MODERN METHODS
Assessment Centres
This is one on the latest and widely used method of performance appraisal. In this
method not only superior but also peers and subordinates do the appraisal. Hence this is a
method where each and every person with whom the employee may interact during his work
does the appraisal of one person. This is an effective method among all since this is method
in which there is a possibility of hundred percent discussions with people disregarding with
their cadres and also possible for receiving more ideas from all. They may include the
security guard, the receptionist, the sweepers evade boys and of course his superior,
subordinates and peers.
WHO OF APPRAISAL?
This issue states who should be rated and who should do rating.
WHAT OF APPRAISAL?
WHY OF APPRAISAL?
It is concerned with:
Providing useful criteria for determining the validity of selection and training
methods and techniques and forming concrete measures for attracting individuals of
higher calibre to the enterprise.
WHEN OF APPRAISAL?
The when of appraisal answers the query about the frequency of appraisal?
WHERE OF APPRAISAL?
HOW OF APPRAISAL?
Under How the company must decide what different methods are available and
which of these may be used for performance appraisal.
BENEFITS OF APPRAISAL
Performance appraisal offers an excellent opportunity perhaps the best that will
ever occur- for a supervisor and sub-ordinate to recognize and agree upon individual training
development needs. During the discussion of an employees work performance, the presence
or absence of work skills can become very obvious- even to those who habitually reject the
idea of training for them!
Performance appraisal can make the need for training more pressing and the
relevant by linking it clearly performance to performance outcome and career aspirations.
The ideal approach to performance evaluation is that in, which the evaluator is free
from personal biases, prejudices. This is because when an evaluation is objective, it
minimizes the potential and dysfunctional behaviour of the evaluator, which may be
detrimental to the achievement of the organizational goals. There are many significant
factors, which deter or impede objective evaluation.
HALO EFFECT: One factors excellent score affects the score or the other factor.
SPILL OVER AFFECT: Using past rating unjustly to rate current Performance.
SAME AS ME: Rating highly as the ratter and rate share common qualities and
attitudes.
DIFFERENT FROM ME: Rating lowly as the ratter and rate have different and
conflicting qualities and attitudes.
The present study intends to provide an integrated picture of the level of employees
attitude towards performance appraisal system in Apache Footwear India Private
Limited.
The study has been confined to Apache foot wear india Pvt Ltd only.
This study has been conducted on performance of all the levels of employees in the
organization.
To study the performance appraisal in the Apache Footwear India Pvt Ltd company.
RESEARCH METHODOLGY
SOURCES OF DATA:
After going through different methods of data collection it was decide that both
primary and secondary data are suitable for this survey.
PRIMARY DATA:
DATA SOURCE:
SAMPLE : 90
Different views and suggestions provide by the responds are subjected to personal
bias.
The sample size limited to 90 and overall opinion of the study is attributed to the total
organization.
Agree 35 39%
Disagree 10 11%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
60%
50%
50%
39%
40%
30%
20%
11%
10%
0%
strongly agree agree disagree 0%
strongly disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 50% of
employees are strongly agreed, 39% of them are agreed and 11% of them are disagreed that
the company is supporting the best performance of the employees.
Agree 30 33.3%
Disagree 30 22.2%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
50
44.5
45
40
35 33.3
30
25 22.2
20
15
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 44.5% of the
employees are strongly agreed, 33.3% are agreed and 22.2% of them disagreed that the
performance appraisal is rational in the organization.
Table 4.3. Role of performance appraisal system to win cooperation and team work?
Agree 35 39%
Disagree 10 11%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
60
50
50
39
40
30
20
11
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 50% of them are
strongly agreed, 39% are agreed and 11% are disagreed that the performance appraisal
system is helpful to win cooperation and team work.
Agree 35 38.9%
Disagree 15 16.7%
Total 90 100%
45 42.2
40 38.9
35
30
25
20 16.7
15
10
5 2.2
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 42.2% are
strongly agreed, 38.9% are agreed, 16.7% are disagreed and 2.2% are strongly disagreed that
the performance appraisal system is helpful for improving personal skills.
Table 4.5. Role of performance appraisal system in reducing grievance among the
employees?
Agree 15 16.6%
Disagree 28 31.2%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Graph 4.5. Role of performance appraisal system in reducing grievance among the
employees?
60
52.2
50
40
31.2
30
20 16.6
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 52.2% are
strongly agreed, 16.6% are agreed and 31.2% are disagreed that the performance appraisal
system is helpful in reducing grievance among the employees.
Table 4.6: Role of performance appraisal system to identify the strengths and weakness
of the employees.
Agreed 45 50%
Disagreed 18 20%
Total 90 100%
Graph 4.6: Role of performance appraisal system to identify the strengths and weakness
of the employees.
60
50
50
40
30 27.8
20
20
10
2.2
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 27.8% are
strongly agreed, 50% are agreed, 20% are disagreed and 2.2% are strongly disagreed that the
performance appraisal system to identify the strengths and weakness of the employees.
Table 4.7. Role of performance rating help for the management to provide employee
counselling.
Agree 47 52.2%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
Graph 4.7. Role of performance rating help for the management to provide employee
counselling.
60
52.2
50
38.9
40
30
20
8.9
10
0
Strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: from the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 38.9% are strongly
agreed, 52.2% are agreed and 8.9% are disagreed that the performance rating help for the
management to provide employee counselling.
Yes 70 77.8%
No 20 22.2%
NARAYANA ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 35
Total 90 100%
90
80 77.8
70
60
50
40
30
22.2
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 77.8% are said
yes and 22.2% are said no that the promotion is purely based on performance appraisal.
Disagree 10 11.1%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
60
50
50
38.9
40
30
20
11.1
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph observed that out of 90 respondents 38.9% are
strongly agreed, 50% are agreed and 11.1% are disagreed with the superiors constructive
feedback throughout the year.
10. Role of immediate superiors appraise all the work done by the employee
throughout the year.
Table 4.10: Role of immediate superiors appraise all the work done by the employee
throughout the year.
Agree 25 27.8%
Disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
Graph 4.10: Role of immediate superiors appraise all the work done by the employee
throughout the year.
60
52.2
50
40
30 27.8
20
20
10
0
strongly agree agree 0
disagree strongly disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 52.2% are strongly agreed,
27.8% are agreed and 20% are strongly disagreed with the immediate superiors appraise all
the work done by the employee throughout the year.
11. communication of performance appraisal goals clearly with the employees at the
starting year.
Table 4.11: communication of performance appraisal goals clearly with the employees at
the starting year.
Yes 62 68.9%
No 28 31.1%
Total 90 100%
Graph 4.11: communication of performance appraisal goals clearly with the employees
at the starting year.
80
68.9
70
60
50
40
31.1
30
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 68.9% are said yes and 31.1%
are said no that the performance appraisal goals are clearly communicate to the employees at
the starting year.
Agree 38 42.2%
Disagree 11 12.2%
Total 90 100%
45 42.2
40
35
30
30
25
20
15.6
15 12.2
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 30% are strongly agreed, 42.2%
are agreed, 12.2% are disagreed and 15.6% are strongly disagreed that the training
requirement fulfil after the appraisal.
Table 4.13: Are you satisfied with existing performance appraisal system?
Agree 20 22.2%
Disagree 15 16.7%
Total 90 100%
60
50
50
40
30
22.2
20 16.7
11.1
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 50% are strongly agreed, 22.2%
are agreed, 16.7% are disagreed and 11.1% are strongly disagreed with the existing
performance appraisal system.
Yes 67 74.4%
No 23 25.6%
Total 90 100%
80
74.4
70
60
50
40
30 25.6
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 74.4% are said yes and 25.6%
are said no that the performance appraisal rating done periodically.
Table 4.15: Do you get proper feedback on your performance from your supervisors?
Agree 45 50%
Disagree 10 11.1%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
Graph 4.15: Role of feedback from their supervisors based on their performance.
60
50
50
38.9
40
30
20
11.1
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 38.9% are strongly agreed, 50%
are agreed and 11.1% are disagreed that the feedback from their supervisors based on their
performance.
Table 4.16: Does the management totally involve in this performance appraisal?
Agree 30 33.3%
Disagree 20 22.2%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
50
44.5
45
40
35 33.3
30
25 22.2
20
15
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 44.5% are strongly agreed,
33.3% are agreed and 22.2% are disagreed that the management totally involve in the
performance appraisal.
Agree 20 35.6%
Disagree 15 22.2%
Strongly disagree 10 0%
Total 90 100%
45 42.2
40
35.6
35
30
25 22.2
20
15
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 42.2% are strongly agreed,
35.6% are agreed and 22.2% are disagreed that the performance appraisal increases the
relation between management and employees.
Agree 40 44.4%
Disagree 18 20%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 90 100%
45
40
40
35
32
30
25
20 18
15
10
0
strongly agree agree disagree strongly0disagree
Interpretation: From the above graph out of 90 respondents 32% are strongly agreed, 40%
are agreed and 18% are disagreed that the management in recognition of employee
performance absolutely.
1. 50% of employees are strongly agreed, 39% of them are agreed and 11% of them are
disagreed that the company is supporting the best performance of the employees.
2. 44.5% of the employees are strongly agreed, 33.3% are agreed and 22.2% of them are
disagreed that the performance appraisal is rational in the organization.
3. 50% of them are strongly agreed, 39% are agreed and 11% are disagreed that the
performance appraisal system is helpful to win cooperation and team work.
4. 42.2% are strongly agreed, 38.9% are agreed, 16.7% are disagreed and 2.2% are
strongly disagreed that the performance appraisal system is helpful for improving
personal skills.
5. 52.2% are strongly agreed, 16.6% are agreed and 31.2% are disagreed that the
performance appraisal system is helpful in reducing grievance among the employees.
6. 27.8% are strongly agreed, 50% are agreed, 20% are disagreed and 2.2% are strongly
disagreed that the performance appraisal system to identify the strengths and
weakness of the employees.
7. 38.9% are strongly agreed, 52.2% are agreed and 8.9% are disagreed that the
performance rating help for the management to provide employees counselling.
8. 77.8% are said yes and 22.2% are said no that the promotion is purely based on
performance appraisal.
9. 38.9% are strongly agreed, 50% are agreed and 11.1% are disagreed with the
superiors constructive feedback throughout the year.
10. 52.2% are strongly agreed, 27.8% are agreed and 20% are strongly disagreed with the
immediate superiors appraise all the work done by the employee throughout the year.
11. 68.9% are said yes and 31.1% are said no that the performance appraisal goals are
clearly communicate to the employees at the starting year.
12. 30% are strongly agreed, 42.2% are agreed, 12.2% are disagreed and 15.6% ar
strongly disagreed that the training requirement fulfil after the appraisal.
13. 50% are strongly agreed, 22.2% are agreed, 16.7% are disagreed and 11.1% are
strongly disagreed with the existing performance appraisal system.
14. 74.4% are said yes and 25.6% are said no that the performance appraisal rating done
periodically.
15. 38.9% are strongly agreed, 50% are agreed and 11.1% are disagreed that the feedback
from their supervisors based on their supervisors based on their performance.
16. 44.5% are strongly agreed, 33.3% are agreed and 22.2% are disagreed that the
management totally involve in the performance appraisal.
17. 42.2% are strongly agreed, 35.6% are agreed and 22.2% are disagreed that the
performance appraisal increases the relation between management and employees.
SUGGESTIONS:
CONCLUSION
Designation: Experience:
Age: Department:
Qualification:
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Yes (b) No
6. Does performance appraisal system helps to identify the strength and weakness of the
employee?
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
7. Is performance appraisal rating help for the management to provide employee counselling?
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Yes (b) No
9. Do you receive constructive feedback from your superior throughout the year?
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
10. Does your immediate superior appraise all work done by you throughout the year?
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
11. Are performance appraisal goals clearly communicate to you at the starting of the year?
(a)Yes (b) No
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Yes (b) No
15. Do you get proper feedback on your performance from your supervisors?
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
17. Does the performance appraisal increases the relation between management and
employees?
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
(a)Strongly agree (b) agree (c) cannot say (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree
ANY SUGGESTIONS:
BIBILOGRAPHY:
WEB SITES
www.citeHr.com
HR@classmates.com
hrconnect@nass.com
www.gigapedia.com
www.performance-appraisal.com
www.appraisals.naukrihub.com