buy

« windows
Group that calls 7
Blacks “Colored People” passes resolution blasting Tea Party ʻracismʼ
Video from
professionalCNN: Roland Martin, Wolf Blitzer and Mark Williams debate »
family pack price
NAACP
of nero 9 buy Resolution: Colored People change minds about emancipation
microsoft
.
project 2003
Astonishing.
download adobe
indesign
In everycs3 buy
one of the dozens of interviews that I have done regarding the anti-Tea Party resolution passed by the NAACP I have brought
adobeup thefireworks
absurdity of a group that calls blacks “Colored People” hurling charges of racism. Whats more, each interviewer has defended
cs5thatmac phrase
buyand expressed surprise that I would consider that phrase to be racist!
visual studioColored
Apparently pro People are an entirely new race of people and one to which the title applies. Here NAACP President Precious Ben
2008 buy adobe to President Abraham Lincoln the reasons for the resolution in this newly discovered letter :
Jealous explains
creative suite
cs4 buy nortonDear Mr. Lincoln
ghost 14 We canColored
you People have taken a vote and decided that we donʼt cotton to that whole emancipation thing.
buy microsoft means having to work for real, think for ourselves, and take consequences along with the rewards.
Freedom
office online That buy
is just far too much to ask of us Colored People and we demand that it stop!
office 2003 In fact we held a big meeting and took a vote in Kansas City this week. We voted to condemn a political revival
standard ofbuy that old abolitionist spirit called the ʻtea party movementʼ.
mathworks
matlab purchase
adobe indesign
(article continues after ad)
cs4 buy
microsoft office
in canada buy
Read more
microsoft sqlabout how political correctness has nearly defeated the American Dream and how the unholy left is
attempting
server 2008to enslave us all. Learn how the Tea Party Movement and you are taking our country back and how to
cheap adobe think for yourself! CLICK HERE FOR “TAKING BACK AMERICA; One Tea Party at a Time”
illustrator cs5
best price
outlook price of
microsoft office
2007
professional
rosetta stone
italian used
cheap microsoft
excel 2003
Click on Mark to get
cheapyour adobe
copy cs5
now!
design premium
purchase
microsoft office
The tea party position to “end the bailouts” for example is just silly. Bailouts are just big money welfare and
2007 isnʼt that what we want all Colored People to strive for? What kind of racist would want to end big money
professional welfare? What they need to do is start handing the bail outs directly to us Colored People! Of course, the
where to National
buy Association for the Advancement of Colored People is the only responsible party that should be
windows grantedxp the right to disperse the funds.
service pack And the2 ridiculous idea of “reduce[ing] the size and intrusiveness of government.” What kind of massa would
buy photoshop
 ever not want to control my life? As Colored People we must have somebody care for us otherwise we would
be on our own, have to think for ourselves and make decisions and if you do not agree than there is not enough
Colored in your People, as we labeled Ken Gladney [source]
The racist tea parties also demand that the government “stop the out of control spending.” Again, they directly
target Colored People. That means we Colored People would have to compete for jobs like everybody else and
that is just not right.
Perhaps the most racist point of all in the tea parties is their demand that government “stop raising our taxes.”
That is outrageous! How will we Colored People ever get a wide screen TV in every room if non-coloreds get to
keep what they earn? Totally racist! The tea party expects coloreds to be productive members of society?
Mr. Lincoln, you were the greatest racist ever. We had a great gig. Three squares, room and board, all our
decisions made by the massa in the house. Please repeal the 13 th and 14 th Amendments and let us get back to
where we belong.
Sincerely
Precious Ben Jealous, Tomʼs Nephew National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Head
Colored Person

(click here to comment)

New From MarkTalk.com:

DEFEND YOURSELF! A guide to getting a concealed weapons permit

New from Mark Williams and

MarkTalk.com. How to get a gun
permit legal in 32 states without
leaving your own! CLICK ON THE
PHOTO FOR YOUR COPY!
Tags: ben precious, emancipation, kenneth gladney, mark williams, naacp, national association for the advancement of colored
people, tea party
This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 14th, 2010 at 6:40 AM and is filed under MarkTalk.com News & Commentary. You can follow any responses to this
entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

15 Responses to “NAACP Resolution: Colored People change minds about emancipation”

1. Christopher Renner says:

July 15, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Mark, I assume the point you were trying to make here was that the NAACP enables the welfare mentality that harms so many
blacks and others. Thatʼs perfectly valid.
 This post, though, is an utter failure at communicating that idea. Maybe itʼd sound better if you were reading it on your radio
show, I donʼt know. As it reads now, youʼre just giving the Tea Partyʼs opponents ammunition to use against us. It would be
unbelievably easy for someone to draw a conclusion that youʼre a racist from this post, given the crude stereotypes and
repeated use of the term “colored people”.
Reply

2. Tommy V says:
July 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM
I have to agree with Christopher Renner. I get your point here, highlighting the absurdity of the NAACPʼs position. But it would
be very easy, even likely, that someone would read this and infer that youʼre mocking the black community as a whole, rather
than the absurd positions of a small minority of self-annointed blacks to limit the success of other blacks for their own gain.
Youʼre going to have to clarify this at some point, I am sure.
Reply

Mark Williams says:

July 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Where in that article do you see me addressing American Blacks, or any black people for that matter?
I am mocking those people who call themselves “Colored People” and who are now fighting to be kept as government
owned pets, whilst hurling charges of racism at those who embrace freedom and civil rights.
It is in your head that the term “Colored People” means “Black”.
Reply

Jim says:
July 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM
No, itʼs ingrained in the minds of the collective populace because it *was* used in the past to refer to blacks.
Youʼre being too cute by one-half. If your intent was to ʻpreach to the choirʼ, you probably succeeded.
Unfortunately, due to your status within the Tea Party movement, you probably just set back the entire
movement by giving several sticks of wood, a match and a can of gasoline to those on the Left (which, obviously
includes the MSM) who love to promote the “Tea Party is racist” meme.
Reply

Mark Williams says:

July 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Such is the crippling power of PC that otherwise freedom loving people cave at the first whiff of what
somebody else might think. I personally do not care what the lowest common denominator thinks of me,
they are the current administrationʼs power base and are kept like favored house pets. They are fighting
against your and my right to think and speak, and they are winning.
You must have dozed off or something Jim because your pod has clearly hatched.
Reply

Joe says:
July 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM
The ʻTea Partyʼ movement was hijacked by this guy and others like him. The basis for the original ʻTea
Partyʼ was a libertarian one – ending our current pro-war stance, getting rid of invasive foreign policy,
anti-torture, pro civil liberties.
What did all of you ʻtea partiersʼ do during the debates when the originator of the Tea Party spoke of
these principals? Laughed in his face.. Talk about riding someoneʼs coat-tails. Thats the pot calling the
kettle colored. I mean black. I mean colored.
Reply

Mark Williams says:

July 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM
I am clueless as to your point Joe about “this guy”, libertarians and debates involving “the
originator of the Tea Party”. History suggests that Samuel Adams would be the originator and to
the best of my knowledge the tea partiers were with him at the [Old] South Meeting House, where
they had gathered to act on the idea.
That was 1773 so you will excuse me for being absent.
I shall do my best to answer the part of your comment that I actually understand.
 My first tea party was 206 years later in 1979 when we organized to beat back a massive pay
increase that the Massachusetts legislature voted itself (we won) and then again in 1988 when the
Congress did the same thing. In that instance we not only beat back the pay increase but secured
the resignation of then Speaker Jim Wright.
The current incarnation was of course sparked by a TV commentator in February 2009 and
followed through on by some 50,000+ individuals who organized to hold our first series of rallies a
week later.
The Sacramento rally, organized by Free Republic and emceed by me was on February 29, 2009.

3. Christopher Renner says:

July 15, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Mark, you used the word “massa” twice and mentioned a wide-screen TV. Tell me thatʼs not easily mistaken as alluding to
blacks in general.
Reply

Mark Williams says:

July 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM
“massa” owned slaves. The group that calls itself “Colored People” want government to be the new massa.
Try thinking for yourself instead of getting all hung up on whatever baggage filled with guilt youʼre carrying around. The
entire point of my book “One Tea Party at a Time” is that you are crippled – mentally and emotionally by political
correctness and thus powerless to defend yourself. You are at the mercy of whatever you fear somebody else may think
of you…
…unless you drop the PC garbage and look at the issues. The reasons the NAACP did what it did are several: Mr.
Jealous trying to save his own political ass in an organization that is lukewarm about him; the group is a dusty throwback
fighting to be relevant again; they are cashing in on the tea party movement by hitching a ride on the Tea Party Express;
and they want to continue enslaving American Blacks with the yolk of the past and strike fear into your heart.
Reply

Christopher Renner says:

July 15, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Two things:
1. I donʼt have one iota of guilt over things that were done by other white people in the past, and I never give a
free pass to anyone because of bad things that happened to their ancestors. Please donʼt assume that everyone
criticizing you buys into that nonsense.
2. My point was not that youʼre a racist, itʼs that youʼre making it really easy for someone to mistakenly conclude
that youʼre a racist. As something of a leader in the tea party movement, itʼs irresponsible of you to be that
reckless with your words when the movement as a whole has just about entirely refuted the nonsensical
accusations of racism coming from the NAACP and elsewhere.
Reply

4. Ben says:
July 15, 2010 at 12:17 PM
I understand what your point is Mark. However I have to agree that it is crudely written and lacks the subtlety that one expects
with true satire.
Do yourself a favor and take it down to rework because while I could see what youʼve written
Reply

Ben says:
July 15, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Try this again.
While I can see what youʼve written being understood by many, when trying to prove absurdity by being absurd, you
want people to be more focused on the absurdity of the point youʼre mocking, not the absurdity of how poorly and non-
subtly
Reply

Ben says:
July 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM
(donʼt try commenting from an iPhone on here geez!)
 …how non-subtly you wrote it.
Reply

5. Rubin Safaya says:

July 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM
Being left of center, I was actually about to defend Mark Williams who on the TV spot sounded like he was being racist with his
remarks about Katrina and blacks “too stupid to get out of the way”… I listened to the whole thing and it sounded as if heʼs
quoting someone else.
But then I go to this webpage, to the source of this imagined Lincoln letter, and like Tea Partiers who themselves have
commented on the vagueness of the message, I too am puzzled by exactly what Mark is trying to say.
Reply

Mark Williams says:

July 15, 2010 at 3:31 PM
Real simple. That the NAACP does not speak for anyone outside of its own narrow little group of backward looking
people. In their world view they still cannot sit at a lunch counter or the front of the bus. The last group in America for
whom they can claim a right to speak for is Black American Citizens. W.E.B. DuBois never intended the organization to
work against civil rights and use the government as an extortionist for favored social classes.
The difference between then and now is that DuBois knew real racism first hand. He also knew the power of
government to perpetuate and enforce that racism. Jealous and his cronies would be set upon by the original NAACP
founders and run out the organization faster than we in the tea party movement disavow racists who try to latch onto us.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Submit Comment

Conservative Advertising Copyright 1998-2009 by Mark Williams All Rights Reserved MarkTalk.com |
Political SEO by Jeff Cline Pundint SEO Rockwall Texas Auto Insurance Agent | Minnesota Car Insurance | Virginia Car
InsuranceFinance Box Leads | Sign App | Members Insurance