Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

ASSIGNMENT

________________________________________________________________________

HBEL3303
LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING
JANUARY 2017 SEMESTER
________________________________________________________________________

INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS

1. This assignment contains only ONE (1) question that is set in the language of the printed module for the
course.

2. Answer in English.

3. Learners are to submit assignment only in MS-WORD format unless specified otherwise. Please refrain
from converting text/phrases into picture format such as .gif / .jpeg / print screen / etc.

4. Download the language version of the assignment template concerned from the myINSPIRE for
preparation and submission of your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times
New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing.

5. Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. Do not copy the
assignment question and instructions to your answer. Only assignment answer developed within the
approximate word limit will be assessed. The number of words should be shown at the end of your
assignment.

6. You must submit your assignment ONLINE via the myINSPIRE . Refer to the portal for instructions on
the procedures to submit your assignment online. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted
assignment and proof of the submission for personal reference.

7. You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file.

8. Your assignment must be submitted between 6th March 19th March 2017. Submission after 19th March
2017 will NOT be accepted.

9. Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another persons assignment. You
should also not plagiarise another persons work as your own.

10. Please take note that PENALTY will be imposed on late submission of assignment as specified in the
Registrars Office circular 6/2012 (Refer to Registrars Announcement in myVLE).

11. Please ensure that you keep the RECEIPT issued upon submisson of your assignment as proof of
submission. Your assignment is considered as NOT submitted if you fail to produce the submission receipt
in any dispute arises concerning assignment submission.

1
EVALUATION

This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed
based on the Rubrics or Answer Scheme attached.

You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination
commences.

PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION

Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If


plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows:

No. Similarity Percentage (%) Marks Deduction (%)


1. 0 30 120 0
2. 30.01 50 122 5
3. 50.01 70 124 10
4. 70.01 - 100 126 100

Assignments found to have similarities under any of the categories above; will not be entitled
to apply for appeal. For learners who fall into the 70.01-100 similarities group, the access for
online appeal for assignment remarking of the subject will be disabled from the appeal
options.

2
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

All languages are known to display a substantial amount of internal variations. These are
called language varieties. According to your course module topic 9, Hudson (1980) states
that a variety of language comprises a set of linguistic items which are distributed similarly
and these include sounds, words, grammatical features, etc.

In this assignment, you are requested to conduct an interview for about 20 minutes with each
of the 4 Malaysian undergraduates (bilingual or multilingual) in English on the varieties of
the English Language spoken in Malaysia and the reasons for the differences. With their
consent, these conversations are to be recorded and transcribed. Based on these
conversations, discuss the following in the assignment:

(a) Describe the varieties of language that emerge in the interviews in terms of code-
switching and code mixing. Provide at least THREE examples each for code-
switching and code mixing by quoting excerpts from the interview.

(b) Discuss the factors that lead to code switching and code mixing based on the
conversations by the respondents above and compare them with what is stated in the
literature.

(c) Explain whether creoles and pidgins exist in the Malaysian context and give your
reasons why.

(d) In your opinion, what is the impact of using code-switching and code mixing on the
teaching and learning of English.

[Total: 40 marks]

3
Assignment Rubrics

Missing
Low Fair Above average Excellent
Criteria Item Max
Weight
0 1 2 3 4 Marks
Introduction 1.5 There is no The introduction does The introduction The introduction The introduction previews 6
introductio not mention the previews the structure previews the structure of the structure and objectives
n to the structure and of the paper in a clear the paper and objectives of the paper clearly.
paper. objectives of the paper manner. in a clear manner. Important concepts are also
and important clearly explained.
concepts.
Details about the 1.5 There is no Brief mention of data Brief description of Quite detailed Very detailed description on 6
methodology and description collection but lacks data collection, description on data data collection, respondents
content of the on how description of respondents selected collection, respondents selected and the content of
interviews conducted data is respondents selected and the content of the selected and the content the interviews conducted
(including excerpts) collected. and the content of the interviews with a few of the interviews with sufficient excerpts
interviews and excerpts provided conducted with some of provided.
excerpts. excerpts
provided.
Analysis of factors 2.5 No The comparative Brief comparative Quite detailed Very Detailed comparative 10
leading to code comparativ analysis presented analysis of factors comparative analysis of analysis of factors leading
switching and code e analysis lacks focus on the leading to code factors leading to code to code switching and code
mixing and presented. factors leading to code switching and code switching and code mixing with references
comparisons made switching and code mixing. mixing made to the module and
with the literature mixing. other sources. The analysis
is deemed above the
expectations.
Discussion on 1.5 No valid Lacks reasonable Brief reasons provided Quite detailed reasons Very detailed reasons 6
whether creoles and reasons reasons for the for the discussion on given for the discussion provided for the discussion
pidgins can exist in provided discussion on whether whether creoles and on whether creoles and on whether pidgins and
the Malaysian creoles and pidgins pidgins can exist in the pidgins can exist in the creoles can exist in the
context with can exist in the Malaysian context Malaysian context with Malaysian context with
reasonable reasons Malaysian context with little references some references cited sufficient references made
given made to relevant from relevant sources. to the module and relevant
sources sources
Missing
Low Fair Above average Excellent
Criteria Item Max
Weight
0 1 2 3 4 Marks
Impact of using code- 1.5 Very little Little discussion on Some discussion on Quite detailed A very detailed discussion 6
switching and code discussion the impact of code the impact of code discussion on the impact on the impact of code
mixing on the on the switching and code switching and code of code switching and switching and code mixing
teaching and impact of mixing is presented mixing is presented code mixing is presented is presented. With
learning of English- code with little or no with justifications with justifications justifications. The
Opinions switching justifications discussion is deemed to be
and code above the expectations.
mixing is
presented.

Conclusion 1 No There is no clear The conclusion is The conclusion The conclusion effectively 4
conclusion conclusion, the paper reasonable, but does summarizes the content summarizes the content,
provided. just ends. not summarize the and includes opinions includes opinions related to
content of the paper. related to the main the main ideas and ends
ideas. with a good closing.

Organisation 0.5 Not There is little sense Details are not in Details are placed in a Details are placed in a 2
relevant. that the writing is logical order and logical order but logical order and presented
organised. distracts the reader. presented less effectively. The paper is
effectively. interesting.

TOTAL MARKS 40

Вам также может понравиться