Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Readers will treat hypercalcemia promptly and determine the cause ON A
KEREN ZHOU, MD STEVEN ASSALITA, MD SUSAN E. WILLIAMS, MS, RD, MD, FACP FACE CLINICAL
Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Baylor College Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, CASE
Cleveland Clinic of Medicine, Houston, TX Cleveland Clinic; Associate Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner
College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, OH
Lithium Bisphosphonates
Lithium is known to cause hypercalcemia. Calcitonin
Multiple mechanisms have been proposed, Intravenous fluids
including direct action on renal tubules and Furosemide
the intestines leading to calcium reabsorption
and stimulation of PTH release. Interestingly, Our patient met the criteria for the diagnosis
parathyroid gland hyperplasia has been noted of hypercalcemic crisis, usually defined as an
in long-term users of lithium. An often-pro- albumin-corrected serum calcium level higher
posed mechanism is that lithium increases than 14 mg/dL associated with multiorgan
the threshold at which the parathyroid glands dysfunction resulting from the hypercalce-
slow their production of PTH, making them mia.21 The mnemonic stones, bones, abdomi-
less sensitive to serum calcium levels.17 nal moans, and psychic groans captures the
renal, skeletal, gastrointestinal, and neurolog-
Vitamin A supplementation ic manifestations.1
Multiple case reports have linked hypercal-
cemia to ingestion of large doses of vitamin Bisphosphonates
A. The mechanism is thought to be increased Bisphosphonates are analogues of pyrophos-
bone resorption.18.19 phonates, which are normally incorporated
Although our patient reported supplement into bone. Unlike pyrophosphonates, bisphos-
phonates inhibit osteoclast function. They are
use, he denied taking vitamin A in any form.
often used to treat hypercalcemia of any cause,
Proton pump inhibitors although they are currently approved by the
Proton pump inhibitors are not known to cause US Food and Drug Administration for treat-
hypercalcemia. On the contrary, case reports ing hypercalcemia of malignancy only. As in-
suggest that prolonged use of proton pump in- travenous monotherapy, they are superior to
hibitors is associated with hypocalcemia and other forms of treatment and are among the
hypomagnesemia, although the mechanism is first-line agents in management.
still not fully understood. A low magnesium Two bisphosphonates shown to be effec-
All tive in hypercalcemia are zoledronate and
level is known to reduce PTH secretion and
management also skeletal responsiveness to PTH, which pamidronate. Pamidronate begins to lower se-
approaches can lead to profound hypocalcemia.20 rum calcium levels within 2 days, with a peak
effect at around 6 days.22 However, in studies
call for uid CASE CONTINUED comparing the 2 drugs, zoledronate has been
repletion as an shown to be more effective in normalizing
On further questioning, the patient revealed serum calcium, with the additional benefit
initial step in that the supplement prescribed by his naturo- of having a much more rapid infusion time.23
hypercalcemia pathic practitioner contained vitamin D. Al- Zoledronate is contraindicated in patients
though he had been instructed to take 1 tablet with creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/
weekly, he had begun taking it daily with his min; however, pamidronate may continue to
other routine medications, resulting in a daily be used.24
dose in excess of 60,000 IU of cholecalciferol
(vitamin D3). The recommended dose is no Calcitonin
more than 4,000 IU/day. This hormone inhibits bone resorption and
The supplement was immediately discon- increases excretion of calcium in the kidneys.
tinued. His hydrochlorothiazide was also held It is not recommended for use alone because of
due to its known effect of reducing urinary cal- its short duration of action and tachyphylaxis,
cium excretion. but it can be used in combination with other
agents, particularly in hypercalcemic crisis.22
INITIAL TREATMENT OF HYPERCALCEMIA It has the most rapid onset (within 2 hours)
of the available medications, and when used
In a patient such as ours, with severe hy- Much has been postulated concerning the
percalcemia and evidence of neurologic con- mechanism of vitamin D intoxication and
sequences, calcitonin should be used for its subsequent hypercalcemia. Studies have
rapid and effective action in lowering serum shown it is not an increase in dietary calci-
calcium as other interventions take effect. um absorption that drives the hypercalcemia
but rather an increase in bone resorption. As
Intravenous fluids such, bisphosphonates such as pamidronate
Like our patient, many patients with signifi- have been shown to have a dramatic and rapid
cant hypercalcemia have volume depletion as effect on severe hypercalcemia from vitamin
a result of calciuresis-induced polyuria. Many D toxicity. The duration of action varies but is
also have nephrogenic diabetes insipidus from typically between 1 and 2 weeks.22,30
the cytotoxic effect of calcium on renal cells, Corticosteroids such as hydrocortisone are
leading to further volume depletion.27 also indicated in situations of severe toxicity.
All management approaches call for fluid They block the action of 1-alpha-hydroxylase,
repletion as an initial step in hypercalcemia. which converts inactive 25-hydroxyvitamin
However, for severe hypercalcemia, volume D to the active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.
resuscitation alone is unlikely to completely Corticosteroids have also been shown to more
correct the imbalance. In addition to cor- directly reduce calcium resorption from bone
recting dehydration, giving fluids increases and intestine in addition to increasing calci-
glomerular filtration, allowing for increased uresis.31 A small study in the United Kingdom
secretion of calcium at the distal tubule.28 The noted that while bisphosphonates and steroids
recommendation is 2.5 to 4 L of normal saline were equally effective in reducing serum calci-
over the first 24 hours, with continued aggres- um levels, bisphosphonates accomplished this
sive hydration until good urine output is es- reduction more rapidly, with a time to thera-
tablished.21 peutic effect of 9 days as opposed to 22 days.
Our patient, in addition to having acute Fluid hydration, though necessary, is un-
kidney injury thought to be due to prerenal likely to produce complete correction on its
azotemia, appeared to be volume-depleted and own, as previously discussed. 1 week later,
was given aggressive intravenous hydration. his symptoms
THE PATIENT RECOVERS
Furosemide had entirely
Furosemide inhibits calcium reabsorption at The patient was treated with intravenous flu-
ids over 3 days and received 1 dose of pami- resolved, and
the thick ascending loop of Henle, but this ef-
fect depends on the glomerular filtration rate. dronate. Calcitonin was provided over the his calcium
While our patient would likely eventually first 48 hours after presentation to more rap-
level was
benefit from furosemide, it should not be con- idly reduce his calcium levels. He was advised
sidered the first-line therapy, as diuretic use to avoid taking the supplements prescribed by 10.5 mg/dL
in the setting of volume depletion can cause his naturopathic practitioner.
circulatory collapse.29 A relative contraindi- On follow-up with an endocrinologist
cation was his presentation with acute kidney 1 week later, his symptoms had entirely re-
injury. solved, and his calcium level was 10.5 mg/dL.
consequences, which are usually seen be no more than 4,000 IU/day and that
when levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D rise doses may need to be lowered to account
above 250 ng/mL.13 for concurrent use of hypercalcemia-induc-
The Institute of Medicine recommends ing drugs and other vitamin D-containing
that the dosage of vitamin D supplements supplements.32
286 C LEV ELA N D C LINIC J OURNAL OF MEDICINE VOL UME 84 NUM BE R 4 AP RI L 2017