Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10

Dolapo Oshin

The Stagnant Federal Minimum Wage

This research, which is analyzing why and to what extent the United States government

has been unresponsive to the increase of the Federal minimum wage, will highlight several

different reasons as to what influences this outcome. The virtues that the American populous

value is one of the primitive topics that will be addressed seeing that it molds the decisions

taken in politics. In addition to that, an in depth economic analysis will be a focal point that

explains the divide amongst the general public. The famous praise of the American Dream will

be discussed to determine its credibility in todays economy. Finally, world famous economists

have conducted various researches that have produced different outcomes. These

discrepancies in turn ultimately become contradictory of other research within the same field.

If we understood how such circumstances truly influence the economy, we would better

understand why action is paramount in ensuring that worker exploitation is reduced.

One of the most important aspects to focus on within a state is the virtues and

ideologies that are taken importantly. The United States has historically been a strong advocate

for a market economy due to one influential individual popularly deemed as the father of

economics; this person happens to be economist and philosopher: Adam Smith. Smiths iconic

notion of the invisible hand was highlighted in his widely popular book The Wealth of Nations.

Though Adam Smith rarely mentions the invisible hand, it has been widely regarded to as the

focal point of Smiths work. Smith strongly emphasized that the free market is led by an

invisible hand and is solely used to promote an end meaning that anything obstructing the
function of the invisible hand is detrimental to the free market (Concise Encyclopedia of

Economics). Many economists as a result have grasped onto this notion as a reason against the

minimum wage.

The image below depicts the model that economists against the minimum wage go by.

Essentially, the unemployment labeled section is illustrating the fact that the minimum wage

is above equilibrium. Equilibrium is the state where the labor supply and the labor demand are

balanced. Opponents of the minimum wage argue that if the minimum wage is increased, that

implies that it is above the standard equilibrium price which results in unemployment.

In addition to that, opponents of the minimum wage argue that setting a minimum

wage itself is regulatory and completely disrupts the entire free market of economics. Prior to

1992, the popular perception was that a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage would

automatically decrease employment opportunities by three percent (Regulation). The


Minimum Wage Study Commission had initially concluded that increasing the minimum wage

would reduce job employment opportunities for teenagers in particular (Schmitt). Now, if the

federal minimum wage were to be increased from anything above the current rate of $7.25 per

hour, that itself would cause rampart unemployment within the labor force ultimately resulting

in a less efficient economy. However, the telephone survey of fast food restaurants conducted

by David Card and Alan Krueger proved otherwise. Their conducted research concluded that

there was no evidence of decreased employment deriving from an increase in minimum wage.

The discrepancy of results within the economic field itself clearly poses as an agent as to why

minimum wage has not increased. Many are unsure of which action to take seeing as though

there are different outcomes stated from the increase of the minimum wage. Since the early

2000s, there has been two distinct sides of research: One focusing on the new minimum wage

research and the other being keen on the fact that increased minimum wage results in a

negative employment rate (Center for Economic and Policy Research). However, it is very

important to consider results put in practice over that of theoretical assumptions.

However it is very important to realize that a perfectly competitive market does not

exist. For a perfect free market to be in place, there must be the following: a large number of

buyers and sellers, no barriers of entry and exit, a market for all goods and services, and no

interdependence amongst peoples utility functions. The fact that there are barriers to entry

and exit in some industries proves to be problematic for critic of the minimum wage. For

example, the automobile industry is primarily dominated by big name, government subsidized

companies who yield a significant amount of power and influence. As explained in an

automotive manufacturing industry analysis One of the greatest barriers to entry in the
automobile industry is the extremely high amount of capital that is required to purchase

physical manufacturing plants, raw materials, as well as to hire and train

employees(Automotive manufacturing industry analysis) . With that being said, threat of new

sellers in the automotive industry is significantly low. The same can be said of the oil and gas

industry. Similar to the motor industry, the oil and gas industry mandates an immense amount

of capital. The costs of pumping trucks, workers specialized in the field, and the competition

against existing oil and gas corporations are some of the intimations that increases the barrier

of entry. If critics of the minimum wage are to be following a perfectly competitive market, a

model that does not exist in the real world and that is purely theoretical, then the argument

that increased minimum wage causes for increased unemployment is unsound seeing as though

there is no valid proof to support such claims.

The incredible power that corporations hold has a significant effect on the economy. In

the book Capitalism Unleashed, British political economist and author, Andrew Glyn provided

a deep and profound analysis of how labor itself has gradually been losing its bargaining power

and the macroeconomic policies that has intensified those pressures within the labor force

internally. This is the case for the union workers at Boeing. In an effort to conserve more

money, Boeing had decided cut the pension program for their unionized workers (Manning).

Rather than aiming any of these cost cut at any of their executives salary, the earnings of the

workers were directly targeted. Taking into consideration that the Boeing Seattle wing is one of

the largest economic stimulants in the Northwest, Boeing executives had used that to their

advantage with a threat to move its wing out of the Northwest region. Essentially, unless

Boeing machinists had accepted the cut in pensions as part of the companys effort to conserve
capital, they would be unemployed because the wing would be moved. Furthermore, Boeings

demand for increased tax breaks in order to remain in the hosting city proved to further

infuriate lawmakers as Legislator, Bob Hasegawa, stated "Tax breaks and lowering wages can't

be the cornerstone of our economic development policy," (Manning). This situation itself

illustrates the extent to which corporation possess an incredulous amount of bargaining power

over those in the labor sector. In addition, the threat of companies relocating their businesses

oversees to cut costs of production and tax rates are becoming increasingly popular.

Outsourcing too has been cited as a significant reason to why the Federal minimum

wage has been effectively stagnant. With the rapid rise of a tightly weave global economy,

many companies and corporations are seeking to maximize their profits by taking advantage of

less developed economies. Outsourcing is defined as a method used to to procure (as some

goods or services needed by a business or organization) under contract with an outside

supplier (Merriam-Webster). In a research conducted by Forrester Research in 2003, it was

estimated that by the conclusion of 2015, over three million white collar jobs were potentially

at risk of being outsourced and suggested that 11% of US jobs are potentially at risk of being

off-shored (Zhang 776). This research however is not clear on if the jobs outsourced are going

to be out of the U.S economy or if the individuals holding the jobs are simply just being

relocated elsewhere out of the country. The lack of information provided on this is a huge

illustration of an incomplete research that solely makes rash claims. If this research does not

provide who will be benefitted and who is at loss from outsourcing, its content is essentially

discredited and weak. However, that is not to say that outsourcing is not a business move that

is being practiced more often by companies. The major concern here finding out to what extent
is unemployment affected by outsourcing. Businesses that outsource can still retain their

employees; however, they are just based in a different location.

The term that has been widely associated with the minimum wage is the inflation rate.

The definition of inflation according to Arthur Macewan is the general rise in prices

(Macewan). However, it also highlighted that it is not always the case that the price of a good

rises overtime; sometimes it falls. The fact is: the purchasing power of the dollars has reduced

primarily because of inflation. To further explain, the U.S dollar can buy less of goods today

than previously. The major problem is that the cost of loving is not supported by earned wages.

While opponents of an increased minimum wage argue that small businesses would suffer

major losses in revenue by an increase in minimum wage, a 2015 survey had refuted that

conceptualization. A majority of small business owners actually support a gradual increase in

wages citing that it would immediately put more money in the pocket of low-wage workers

who will then spend the money on things like housing, food, and gas. This boost in demand for

goods and services will help stimulate the economy and help create opportunities (U.S

Department of Labor). Furthermore, this account is not only supported by most business

owners but is also accepted by more than 600 economists; seven of those which are Nobel

Prize winners. All in all, if an increase on minimum wage is being supported and advocated by

those who opponent claim would supposedly be hurt by it, then why is legislative action not

being taken?

The American Dream is a principle which many immigrants are familiar with and use as

motivation to better their socioeconomic circumstances. The ideology is simple: if any


individual works hard and is consistent, then their circumstance, weather financial or social, will

change for the better. The story of the steel tycoon, Andrew Carnegie, has always been a

primary example used when referring to the American dream. Carnegie, a poor Scottish

immigrant moved to the United States alongside his family 1848. During that time period,

Carnegie held multiple job occupations which he invested his earned money in to further

accumulate his wealth. Carnegie had no college education or degree but still made enough

income to have some funds to invest. However, that is almost not always the case anymore.

With the purchasing power of the United States current minimum wage alongside the current

cost of living, it is increasingly difficult for individuals to obtain any extra funds outside of their

necessary living expenses. Take this into consideration:

Monthly rent for a single bedroom apartment ~ $700 - $800

Cell phone bill ~ $100 - $150

Car insurance ~ $50 - $100

Electricity ~ $30 - $50

Miscellaneous (internet, cable etc.) ~ $60 - $150

Monthly minimum wage income without tax excluded (7.25 x 40) = 290; 290 x 4 =

$1,160

When taking all these expenses and then subtracting it by the total earned income deriving

from working full time with a minimum wage, it is very clear that the income earned is not

consistent with the expenses that are required to live comfortably. A monthly wage of $1,160 is

not sufficient for any individual to cover these basic expenses and still simultaneously have any
leftover expenses to say for instance, invest in stocks like Andrew Carnegie. Furthermore, these

calculation and values should be enough to prompt government policy makers to adhere to the

needs of the citizens. Citizens and immigrants who come to the United States of America in

search to pursue the American Dream are instantly faced with circumstances that exploit

their labor rather than compensate them for their commitment and diligence within the

workforce.

All in all, the topic of the Federal minimum wage has been a long and very split in

regards to the reasoning behind the stagnation of it. On one end, there are those who oppose

an increase in the federal minimum wage and on the other end, there are those who

vehemently support it. Regardless of what side is being supported, it is very important to

understand the facts behind the criticisms and the mindset of those advocating for it. The

United States of America has a longstanding ideology which has always defended and

promoted a market economy. With that being said, the argument that an increase in the

federal minimum wage automatically results in increased unemployment makes the population

as a whole rather weary. However, Economists have proved otherwise. In a perfectly

competitive market economy, an increase in the Federal minimum wage would result in higher

unemployment. However, it is pivotal to realize that a perfect market economy does not exist

in any market or country in the world because there are barriers of entry and exit into a market.

The motor industry and the oil industry were examples provided earlier that illustrated this

reasoning. Ultimately, it would be unsound to base the opposition of an increased minimum

wage under the pretense of a perfectly competitive market economy. Furthermore, the

telephone survey of fast food restaurant study conducted by economists David Card and Alan
Krueger suggested no evidence of increased unemployment deriving from an increase in the

minimum wage. Large corporations have a heavy hand in the stagnation of an increased Federal

minimum wage. The fact that large companies such as Boeing can threaten workers as well as

policy makers is evident. They threaten to move their companies, call for increased tax breaks,

and their executive are still rewarded while their workers are slowly being exploited. The

influence and power of big name companies is definitely a huge attribute as to why the little

political action has been taken on the issue of the Federal minimum wage. If companies were to

outsource their employees and their companies, many against the Federal minimum wage feel

as if it would be detrimental to the United States economy. However, they fail to understand

that the research provided lacks specification on if the outsourcing still places the workers in

the U.S economy. Therefore, that discredits and weaken the claim that most American

companies would outsource their companies if the Federal minimum wage were to be

increased therefore resulting in increased unemployment. The inflation rate is something that

should have aided in the increase of minimum wage considering the purchasing power of the

dollar has drastically reduced overtime. For a country build on the idea of opportunity with the

term The American Dream, lack of action taken in protecting the dream that they take so

much pride in is rather ironic. Many individuals working full time on minimum are cyclically

unable to make basic ends meet. If the United States of America is simply becoming a territory

solely focused on numerical values at the expense of the general welfare of its occupants, one

should soon expect a country in which is ruled and dominated by large corporations.
Works cited

Van Doren, Peter. "Minimum Wage." Regulation 38.3 (2015): 56-57. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.

Macewan, Arthur. "The Minimum Wage and Inflation." Dollars & Sense July-Aug. 2014: 30.

Web. 11 Nov. 2015.

Wills, Jane. "The Living Wage." Soundings 42 (2009): 33-46, 157. Web. 11 Nov. 2015.

Schmitt, John. Why Does The Minimum Wage Have No Discernible Effect on Employment?.

Washington, D.C. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Web. 11 Nov. 2015.

n.p. Mimimum Wage Mythbusters. United States Department of Labor. n.d. Web. 18

November 2015.

Manning, Jeff. Boeing Gets What It Wants In Nasty Contract Dispute With Machinists. The

Oregonian. Oregon Live, 3 January 2014. Web. 18 November 2015.

n.p. Automotive Manufacturing Industry Analysis. n.d. Web. 18 November2015.

n.p. Adam Smith. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Library of Economics and Liberty,

2008. Web. 18 November 2015.

Zhang, Ting. International Outsourcing and Unemployment in a Minimum-wage Economy.

Review of International Economics. 19.4 (2011): 776-786. Web. 10 December. 2015.

Merriam-Webster. An Encyclopdia Britannica Company. Web. 10 December. 2015

Вам также может понравиться