Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Key words: Allergy, asthma, there is no evidence this remedy in this potency is system. No studies, however, have evaluated the
allergic rhinitis, homeopathic,
homeopathy typically prescribed for weight loss. efficacy of long-term homeopathic constitutional
More comprehensive reviews of this body of treatment. Instead, clinical trials have evaluated
clinical research show that the results reported in the use of homeopathic medicines for treating
The Lancet are less definitive than the review various acute allergy symptoms, usually over a
suggests. These recent reviews show that several one- to three-month period.
high quality trials testing homeopathic medicines
were not included in the analysis, that the defini- Clinical Research Evaluating the
tion of large clinical trial was different for Homeopathic Treatment of Respiratory
allopathic (n=146) than homeopathic (n=98) trials, Allergies
and that the designation of large trials seemed to A body of clinical evidence and laboratory
be post hoc.14-16 findings suggests a biological and clinical effect
from homeopathic medicines in the treatment of
Homeopathy and Allergies respiratory allergies. Because the quality of a
Although the homeopathic principle of similars clinical trial is important to its evaluation, refer-
may be utilized in conventional allergy desensitiza- ence to the quality of the trial by reviewers is
tion shots, there are substantial differences discussed. There have been three meta-analyses of
between conventional and homeopathic allergy homeopathic clinical trials published in high
treatment. First, desensitization shots are only impact journals.5,12,18 These reviews of homeopathic
used in the prevention of allergy symptoms, research will be referred to below with reference to
whereas homeopathic medicines are used for which trials have been deemed to be high quality.
prevention or treatment of allergies. Second, Several clinical studies utilize an isopathic
homeopathic medicines utilize much smaller doses. approach to using homeopathic medicines. That is,
Although sometimes the substance to which the rather than using a substance as a medicine that
person is allergic is prescribed in a homeopathic causes similar symptoms as the ill individual, the
dilution, more frequently a medicine is given based isopathic approach uses a substance that causes
on its ability to cause the similar complex of the same symptoms as the sick persons (the
symptoms (beyond just the allergy symptoms) the prefix iso means same, while homeo means
sick person is experiencing. similar). Examples of such isopathic treatment are
Classically trained homeopaths often prescribe a the use of homeopathic doses of house dust mite to
constitutional medicine, a homeopathic remedy treat house dust mite allergies or the use of
individually chosen based on the constellation of common flowers or grasses, known to cause
physical and psychological symptoms the person is symptoms of hay fever, to treat people suffering
experiencing, not just the allergy symptoms. from hay fever.
Finding a persons constitutional medicine requires To date, no studies have compared the isopathic
the individualized care of a professional homeo- and classical homeopathic methods of allergy
path. Homeopaths contend this approach to treatment, although in both methods the medici-
prescribing homeopathic medicines has the nal substance undergoes the same pharmacological
potential to provide significant relief of acute and manufacturing processes of dilution and
chronic ailments, sometimes leading to significant succussion.
improvement or a cure of the persons allergy
state.17 Rhinitis/Hay Fever Studies
From a homeopathic perspective, one of the Galphimia glauca: Alone or in Combination
great misunderstandings about allergies is the A randomized, controlled trial (RCT) of hay fever
assumption that the allergen (e.g., the cat dander, patients compared the effectiveness of a homeo-
pollen, or house dust mite) is the problem. pathic preparation of Galphimia glauca (Galphimia
Instead, the allergen is the trigger and the allergic 6C) or placebo four times daily while symptoms
persons body is the loaded gun. Rather than persisted.19 What is particularly interesting about
treating and suppressing the persons symptoms or this study is the researchers also compared these
avoiding the allergen as a means of staying healthy, two preparations with a dose of Galphimia diluted
homeopaths seek to find the homeopathic medi- 1:10 six times without the common procedure of
cine that will strengthen the individuals defense succussion of the solution after each dilution. This
study of 132 subjects showed that only the Isopathy: Pollens and Other Seasonal Allergens
correctly manufactured homeopathic medicine that A four-week, double-blind clinical trial compar-
was both diluted and succussed was effective in ing homeopathic preparations with placebo was
reducing nasal and ocular symptoms. conducted in the Phoenix metropolitan area during
On the first follow-up visit (two weeks after the regional allergy season of February to May.23
treatment commenced), ocular symptoms were Subjects (40 men or women, ages 26-63) diagnosed
improved in 70 percent of Galphimia 6C (dilution with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis
and succussion) subjects, 49 percent of Galphimia were given a homeopathic preparation (6X) of
dilution-only subjects, and 55 percent of placebo common allergens in the U.S. Southwest. Study
subjects. Nasal symptoms were improved in 60 outcomes included allergy-specific symptoms using
percent of Galphimia 6C subjects, 40 percent of the rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life question-
Galphimia dilution-only subjects, and 41 percent of naire (RQLQ), functional quality of life using the
placebo subjects. On the second follow-up visit Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (MOS
(four weeks after treatment commenced), ocular SF-36), and the work productivity and activity
symptoms were improved in 80 percent of impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Scales from the
Galphimia 6C subjects, 66 percent of Galphimia RQLQ, MOS SF-36, and WPAI questionnaires
dilution-only subjects, and 65 percent of placebo showed significant positive changes between
subjects. Nasal symptoms were improved in 78 baseline and four weeks in the homeopathic group
percent of Galphimia 6C subjects, 51 percent of compared to the placebo group (p<0.05). Subjects
Galphimia dilution-only subjects, and 58 percent of reported no adverse effects during the intervention
placebo subjects. Statistical significance was found period. These preliminary findings indicate
only in the nasal symptoms after the first visit potential benefits of homeopathic intervention in
(p=0.024). reducing symptoms and improving quality of life in
These same researchers also conducted a multi- patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in the
center RCT to examine the effectiveness of southwestern United States. Although this study
Galphimia 4X for hay fever; the average time of was published in a conventional pharmacology
observation was 5.5 weeks.20 Galphimia was found journal prior to Shangs 2005 meta-analysis, it was
to be more effective than placebo (p<0.01). not reviewed.12
Therapeutic success was reported in 34/41 patients David Reilly, MD, in conjunction with the
(83%) taking Galphimia and 21/45 control patients University of Glasgow and the Glasgow
(47%). Three meta-analyses of homeopathy defined Homeopathic Hospital, conducted a series of
this trial as high quality.5,12,18 clinical trials of homeopathic medicines for
This team of researchers has conducted four treatment of allergic disorders. The first was a pilot
RCTs with homeopathic Galphimia and consis- study of 36 subjects suffering from hay fever.24 An
tently found it to be effective.21 A 1991 meta-analy- RCT was conducted using a 30C potency of mixed
sis in the BMJ defined five trials by Wiesenauer et grass pollens. Subjects given the treatment
al as high quality,18 a 1997 meta-analysis defined experienced a significant reduction in allergy
four trials as high quality,5 and a 2005 meta-analy- symptoms (p=0.002).
sis defined one trial as high quality.12 The successful pilot study led the researchers to
Another team of researchers tested a homeo- conduct a larger RCT of 144 hay fever patients.1
pathic combination nasal spray, consisting of Published in The Lancet, this study found homeo-
Galphimia glauca, Luffa operculata, histamine, and pathically prepared doses of mixed grass pollens in
sulphur, compared with Cromolyn sodium spray, the 30C potency were effective in significantly
an over-the-counter conventional medicine for hay reducing hay fever symptoms compared to patients
fever. In this 42-day RCT, 146 hay fever subjects given a placebo (p=0.02). The Kleijnen18 and Linde5
self-administered the homeopathic or control meta-analyses deemed this trial to be of high
medicine four times daily and found the two quality (in fact, both meta-analyses deemed this
treatments were equally effective.22 Although the trial to be tied for the highest quality trial testing
2005 meta-analysis12 was recent enough to have homeopathic medicines); Shang,12 without expla-
included this trial, it was not included because it nation, did not consider it to be a high quality trial.
compared a homeopathic medicine with a conven- The unique design of this study included a
tional drug, not a placebo. one-week placebo run-in for all subjects. The
homeopathic treatment of people with chronic
diseases, including respiratory allergies, typically greater initial aggravation of rhinitis symptoms
finds an aggravation of symptoms (also called a (within 48 hours) was observed in the homeopathic
healing crisis) occurs shortly after initial treat- treatment group compared to the placebo group
ment. After it dissipates the patient tends to (29% versus 7%; p=0.04). Most symptom aggrava-
experience a significant degree of symptom relief. tions were short-lived, averaging four days.
This study was no exception, with more homeopa- Symptom aggravations were predictive of a later
thy patients (n=21) experiencing a 50-percent or positive response to treatment. Despite the fact it
greater increase in symptoms from week 1 to week was published in the BMJ with an editorial
2 (using a visual analogue scale [VAS]) than those (discussed below), Shangs review (without expla-
in the placebo group (n=11; p<0.05). In the final nation) did not consider this to be a high quality
analysis, however, the homeopathy group experi- study.12
enced greater symptom improvement compared to Addition of these results to those of three
the placebo group. The mean change in VAS previous trials (n=253) shows a mean 28-percent
symptom score from baseline to the end of the trial symptom reduction from homeopathy compared to
in homeopathy subjects was significant compared three percent for placebo (95% CI: 4.2-15.4;
to those in the placebo group (p=0.0004). The VAS p=0.0007).25 An editorial in the BMJ noted that
daily symptom score goes from -100 (representing based on this series of trials, It may be time to
improvement) to +100 (representing symptom confront the conclusion that homeopathy and
increases). The homeopathy group experienced a placebo differ. This may be more plausible than
17.2-point decrease in VAS symptom score, the conclusion that their trials have produced serial
representing symptom improvement, while false positive results.26
placebo subjects experienced only a 2.6-point
decrease in VAS symptom score between the Asthma Studies
placebo run-in week to the end of the fifth week An eight-week trial published in The Lancet
(p=0.02).1 examined the use of homeopathy for the treatment
This study allowed all subjects to use an antihis- of asthma.27 After a four-week placebo run-in, 28
tamine when symptoms warranted. Although a subjects were randomized in double-blind fashion
similar number from each group (47, homeopathy; to receive either placebo or a 30C potency of the
45, placebo) took an antihistamine at least once allergen to which the individual was most sensitive
during the trial, significantly more subjects in the as determined by conventional skin testing; each
homeopathy group (16 of 47) than the placebo subject received a treatment pack of three vials.
group (9 of 45) discontinued these drugs by the The most commonly reactive substance was house
end of the five-week trial. The mean number of dust mite. Significant benefit was noted within the
antihistamine tablets taken by placebo subjects at first week in subjects in the homeopathy group; 9
the end of the trial was double that of the home- of 11 homeopathic subjects experienced improve-
opathy group (p=0.03).1 ment compared to 5 of 13 in the placebo group. The
Another RCT evaluated the effect of homeo- overall difference in improvement between groups
pathic medicine in 51 patients with perennial over four weeks of treatment was 33 percent. The
allergic rhinitis in four general medical practices homeopathy group also experienced a greater
and a hospital ear, nose, and throat outpatient reduction in bronchial reactivity on PC20 a test of
clinic.25 A placebo (n=27) or a 30C potency of the the amount of a bronchial irritant necessary to
substance to which the individual was found most reduce forced expiratory volume in one second
allergic by conventional skin testing (n=24) was (FEV1) by 20 percent. The homeopathy group
given in three doses; one subject in the treatment experienced a median 53-percent increase in
group was lost to follow-up. The treatment group histamine resistance compared with a median
experienced an average 21-percent improvement in seven-percent decrease in the placebo group. The
nasal airflow from baseline compared to a two- Linde meta-analysis defined this trial as high
percent improvement in the placebo group during quality,5 while Shang12 did not.
the third and fourth week (mean difference 19.8 L/ A meta-analysis of the three trials conducted at
min; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.4-29.1; the University of Glasgow,1,25,27 strengthened the
p=0.0001). Although both groups reported evidence that homeopathy provides more thera-
symptom improvement from baseline on VAS, the peutic benefit than placebo (p=0.0004).27
difference was not statistically significant. A
A group of British physicians sought to replicate baseline and 12 months. Other outcome measures
the eight-week asthma study described above. A included subscales of the same questionnaire, peak
16-week study of 202 asthma patients found flow rates, use of medication, symptom scores,
statistically significant improvements from days off school, asthma events, global assessment
baseline in the two primary outcomes measured of change, and adverse reactions. The authors
FEV1 and quality of life in subjects given either found no clinically relevant or statistically signifi-
house dust mite 30C or placebo; there were no cant changes in the active quality of life score
statistically significant differences between (QoL). Other subscales, notably those measuring
groups.28 There were also no statistically significant severity, indicated relative improvements albeit
differences between the treatment and placebo small. There were no differences between groups
groups in secondary outcome measures, although for other measures. The authors conclude this
during the third week the homeopathic group study provides no evidence that adjunctive
experienced a deterioration in some of the second- homeopathic remedies, as prescribed by experi-
ary outcome measures, including the morning peak enced homeopathic practitioners, are superior to
expiratory flow (p=0.025), score on asthma VAS placebo in improving the quality of life in children
(p=0.017), and mood (p=0.035). Although there with mild-to-moderate asthma.
was reduced conventional bronchodilator usage in The above study was highly criticized by Fisher et
the homeopathic patients, the difference was not al who noted its conclusions did not adequately
statistically significant. reflect the shortcomings of the trial.31 The
Reilly et al responded29 by noting numerous authors30 state, There was no evidence of a
differences between the two asthma studies.27,28 Of clinically relevant change in QoL score, but fail to
critical significance is the fact that the latter mention that none was expected since the QoL
study28 gave only three doses of the homeopathic scores were normal at entry (no treatment could
medicine in a 24-hour period, then nothing more have provided statistically significant improve-
for the remainder of the 16-week trial; whereas, ments in such cases). Fishers greatest concern was
subjects in the earlier study were provided three that the bias in the interpretation of the results
doses over a four-week treatment period (although would carry through to future meta-analyses and
the original trial lasted eight weeks, every subject reviews.31
was given a placebo during the first four weeks).
Reilly also noted other differences between the Miscellaneous Respiratory Allergies
two trials, including less rigorous admission Another RCT conducted during the month of
criteria for the patients in the newer study29 and May evaluated the use of homeopathic doses of
different selection criteria. The original studys birch (Betula) tree pollen for people with birch
recruitment was exclusively restricted to patients pollen allergy.32 Although no statistically signifi-
attending a hospital-based specialist center, cant difference between the treatment and placebo
suggesting the newer study utilized healthier groups was found during the first and last weeks,
subjects for whom it is more difficult to show between May 8-18 a clinical difference was revealed
improvement. The original study also used an between the groups, with those receiving Betula
asthma specialist with expertise in interpreting 30C having fewer and less serious symptoms; for
allergy skin testing, thereby providing more some days these differences were statistically
precision in determining to which substance the significant. The homeopathic treatment group also
subject was most allergic. The second study also reported more symptom aggravation than the
lacked a run-in placebo period for all patients. placebo group. Shangs 2005 review did not rate
This latter study29 was not included in Shangs this trial as high quality.12
analysis,12 despite the fact it was published in a A study of 88 Norwegian patients with hypersen-
conventional medical journal with a high impact sitivity illnesses, including asthma, eczema,
factor. urticaria, hay fever, and other allergies, found
White et al performed a double-blind RCT to homeopathy was at least as effective as conven-
compare the effects of individualized homeopathic tional medical treatment.33 The retrospective,
remedies to placebo in 96 children with mild-to- comparative study evaluated clinical practices of
moderate asthma, as an adjunct to conventional general practitioners (GPs) and classical homeo-
treatment.30 The primary outcome measured was paths. The two groups of patients had no statisti-
the active quality of living subscale of the Child- cally significant differences in age, school education,
hood Asthma Questionnaire administered at or duration of hypersensitivity symptoms.
Fifty-four homeopathic patients and 34 GP responses, releasing chemical mediators that cause
patients completed a questionnaire. Most patients allergic symptoms when IgE binds to its specific
treated conventionally experienced symptom allergen.
relapse when medications stopped, while only A series of experiments demonstrates homeo-
one-third of patients in the homeopathy group pathic doses of Apis mellifica (honey bee) and lung
experienced a relapse (p=0.002). Only one patient histamine inhibit basophil degranulation.35 Apis 8C,
in 10 taking conventional treatment experienced 9C, and 10C significantly inhibited basophil
symptom improvement after stopping medication, degranulation after basophils were activated with
compared to improvement in 23 of 33 homeopathy high and low doses of anti-IgE. Apis 5C, 7C, 13C,
patients. Patients in the homeopathic group and 20C caused significant inhibition when
reported a greater improvement in general state of basophils were activated with low anti-IgE doses.
health, with 57 percent improving compared to 24 Significant inhibitions were observed at dilutions
percent in the conventional group (p=0.004). of lung histamine 5C and 15C (28.8% [p<0.005]
Homeopathic patients also experienced substan- and 28.6% [p<0.001], respectively). Apis 9C
tially more positive change in psychological state significantly decreased basophil degranulation
(p<0.0001). Regarding quality of life, 53 percent in from 50.1 percent to 17.0 percent (p<0.02)
the homeopathy group improved compared to 15 compared to saline submitted to the same dilution
percent in the conventional group. This trial was procedure; significant inhibition also occurred after
too recent to have been rated by the three Apis 13C and 20C (p<0.05). Apis 10C and lung
meta-analyses. histaminum 18C caused nearly 100-percent
Two Israeli physicians conducted a retrospective inhibition of basophil activation by small anti-IgE
analysis of patients with respiratory allergies who doses.
had received individually chosen homeopathic French immunologist Jacques Benveniste in
medicines in a complementary medicine clinic conjunction with three university laboratories
affiliated with an Israeli health maintenance (University of Toronto, Hebrew University of
organization.34 The clinics database revealed that Jerusalem, and University of Milan) conducted a
when evaluating drug usage three months before series of studies testing various homeopathic
homeopathic treatment and three months after, 27 potencies of anti-IgE antibodies on basophil
of 31 patients who used conventional allergy degranulation.36 Benveniste et al found that serial
medications (antihistamines, steroids, and 10-fold dilutions of goat anti-human IgE anti-
decongestants) reduced usage of these drugs after serum had a statistically significant effect on the
homeopathic treatment; two patients experienced degranulation of human basophils at dilutions of
an increase in drug usage, and two patients showed 10-120. Efforts to replicate this work were initially
no change. Patients used an average of 3.1 medica- unsuccessful.37,38
tions before homeopathic treatment and 1.6 after Hirst et al attempted to reproduce Benvenistes
(p=0.001). A 60-percent reduction in drug costs findings.38 Following as closely as possible the
was observed after homeopathic treatment, methods of the original study, they found no
amounting to an average savings of $24 per patient evidence for a periodic or polynomial change of
in a three-month period. degranulation as a function of anti-IgE dilution.
Although the above study was not double-blind Their results contain a source of variation for which
or placebo controlled, it provides a glimpse into they cannot account, but no aspect of the data was
real-world health care. These results suggest the consistent with the previously published claims.
use of homeopathic medicines for individuals Four independent laboratories, each associated
suffering from allergies can lead to reduced usage with a university, conducted a different experiment
of conventional drugs and is more cost effective. on basophils using various dilutions of histamine.
This trial was not included in the Shang review Madeleine Ennis (a Queens University professor of
because it was not placebo-controlled.12 clinical biochemistry and lead researcher for this
group of four laboratories) and her team reported a
Laboratory Evidence total of 772 valid data points testing various
In addition to clinical trials, several laboratory potencies of histamine15-19 that showed a highly
studies have shown powerful effects of various significant inhibition of anti-IgE induced basophil
homeopathic doses on biochemical markers related degranulation (p<0.0001).39 One laboratory found
to respiratory allergies, specifically basophils. no statistical significance (p=0.065), while the
Basophils with surface IgE play a role in allergic three other laboratories did find statistical
Although homeopaths assert that this method of hay fever studies used a combination homeo-
homeopathic prescribing provides the longest-term pathic medicine that included flowers to which
benefits, no research confirms this observation. the patients were allergic. Select homeopathic
Based on studies reviewed in this article, pos- pharmacies can provide homeopathic combina-
sible treatment options aside from conventional tions of mixed pollen, mixed grasses, and mixed
classic homeopathic treatment include: molds.
Following the studies of the Glasgow research- Galphimia 4X or 6X could be prescribed alone or
ers, use conventional allergy testing to deter- in combination with other remedies as long as
mine the patients most significant allergen and hay fever symptoms persist.
administer a 30C dose of this substance, Indications for prescription of specific homeo-
repeated as needed every month (these prod- pathic remedies are derived primarily from
ucts are available through pharmacies that toxicological studies called drug provings, which
specialize in homeopathic medicine). are typically single- or double-blind trials con-
A combination of several allergens can be ducted on healthy human subjects to determine
administered. For example, two of the Glasgow what symptoms a substance will cause in overdose.
both tears and nasal discharge burning; nasal obstruction often worse on the right side
symptoms more intense after midnight; tossing and turning in bed; anxious, frightened, and
restless during breathing difficulties
Arsenicum album White arsenic chilly and aggravated in cold air; better in a warm room or from warmth in general
thirst for small sips of warm drinks
sensitive to light; violent sneezing and may develop asthmatic breathing
fastidious to the point that they may feel compelled to clean or bring order to their home or
office even during an illness; prefer company to being alone
irritable disposition; symptoms sometimes begin after being irritated, vexed, or fatigued
fluent nasal discharge during the day and congestion at night
Nux vomica Poison nut symptoms worse indoors and better in the open air
chilly; sensitive to the cold, being uncovered, and noise, odors, and light; feel better in a warm
room and drinking warm fluids
frequent sneezing may be experienced, especially on rising in the morning
House dust mite consider for individuals with allergies to house dust mite, which is the most common allergen
in the world today.46
that homeopathic treatment and 10. Frass M, Linkesch M, Banyai S, et al. 21. Wiesenauer M, Ldtke R. A meta-
placebo differ, further research is Adjunctive homeopathic treatment in analysis of the homeopathic treatment
necessary to evaluate the efficacy of patients with severe sepsis: a random- of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca.
homeopathic treatment in allergic ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Forsch Komplementarmed
patients. trial in an intensive care unit. 1996;3:230-234.
Homeopathy 2005;94:75-80. 22. Weiser M, Gegenheimer LH, Klein P. A
References 11. Vickers AJ, Smith C. Homoeopathic randomized equivalence trial compar-
1. Reilly DT, Taylor MA, McSharry C, Oscillococcinum for preventing and ing the efficacy and safety of Luffa
Aitchison T. Is homoeopathy a placebo treating influenza and influenza-like comp.-Heel nasal spray with Cromolyn
response? Controlled trial of syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev sodium spray in the treatment of
homoeopathic potency, with pollen in 2006;3:CD001957. seasonal allergic rhinitis. Forsch
hayfever as model. Lancet 12. Shang A, Huwiler-Muntener K, Nartey Komplementarmed 1999;6:142-148.
1986;2:881-886. L, et al. Are the clinical effects of 23. Kim LS, Riedlinger JE, Baldwin CM, et
2. Cohen SG. The American Academy of homoeopathy placebo effects? al. Treatment of seasonal allergic
Allergy: a historical review. I. Forward. J Comparative study of placebo-con- rhinitis using homeopathic preparation
Allergy Clin Immunol 1979;64:332-333. trolled trials of homoeopathy and of common allergens in the southwest
3. Ullman D. The Homeopathic Revolution: allopathy. Lancet 2005;366:726-732. region of the US: a randomized,
Why Famous People and Cultural Heroes 13. Fisher P, Berman B, Davidson J, et al. controlled clinical trial. Ann
Choose Homeopathy. Berkeley, CA: Are the clinical effects of homeopathy Pharmacother 2005;39:617-624.
North Atlantic Books; 2007. placebo effects? Lancet 24. Reilly D, Taylor M. Potent placebo or
4. Bellavite P, Ortolani R, Pontarollo F, et 2005;366:2082-2083. potency? A proposed study model with
al. Immunology and homeopathy. 4. 14. Frass M, Schuster E, Muchitsch I, et al. initial finding using homeopathically
Clinical studies part 2. Evid Based Asymmetry in The Lancet meta-analysis. prepared pollens in hay fever. Br
Complement Alternat Med Homeopathy 2006;95:52-53. Homeopath J 1985;74:65-74.
2006;3:397-409. 15. Ldtke R, Rutten AL. The conclusions 25. Taylor MA, Reilly D, Llewellyn-Jones
5. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, et al. on the effectiveness of homeopathy RH, et al. Randomised controlled trial
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed of homoeopathy versus placebo in
placebo effects? A meta-analysis of trials. J Clin Epidemiol perennial allergic rhinitis with overview
placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 2008;61:1197-1204. of four trial series. BMJ
1997;350:834-843. 16. Rutten AL, Stolper CF. The 2005 2000;321:471-476.
6. Bonhoft G, Wolf U, von Ammon K, et al. meta-analysis of homeopathy: the 26. This week in the BMJ. Homoeopathic
Effectiveness, safety and cost-effective- importance of post-publication data. dilutions may be better than placebo.
ness of homeopathy in general practice Homeopathy 2008;97:169-177. BMJ 2000;321. http://www.bmj.com/
summarized health technology 17. Vithoulkas G. The Science of Homeopathy. cgi/content/full/321/7259/0/b
assessment. Forsch Komplementmed New York, NY: Grove Press; 1985. [Accessed February 2, 2010]
2006;13:19-29. 18. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. 27. Reilly D, Taylor MA, Beattie NG, et al. Is
7. Witt CM, Bluth M, Albrecht H, et al. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ evidence for homoeopathy reproduc-
The in vitro evidence for an effect of 1991;302:316-323. ible? Lancet 1994;344:1601-1606.
high homeopathic potencies a 19. Wiesenauer M, Gaus W. Double-blind 28. Lewith GT, Watkins AD, Hyland ME, et
systematic review of the literature. trial comparing the effectiveness of the al. Use of ultramolecular potencies of
Complement Ther Med 2007;15:128-138. homeopathic preparation of Galphimia allergen to treat asthmatic people
8. Bellavite P, Ortolani R, Conforti A. potentiation D6, Galphimia dilution allergic to house dust mite: double blind
Immunology and homeopathy. 3. 10-6, and placebo on pollinosis. randomised controlled clinical trial.
Experimental studies on animal models. Arzneimittelforschung BMJ 2002;324:520.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 1985;35:1745-1747. 29. Rapid response to BMJ 2002;324:520.
2006;3:171-186. 20. Wiesenauer M, Haussler S, Gaus W. Reilly D. A pilot design of diluted power.
9. FrassM,Dielacher C, Linkesch M, et al. Pollinosis therapy with Galphimia glauca. It might prove effectiveness, but it does
Influence of potassium dichromate on Fortschr Med 1983;101:811-814. not disprove efficacy. http://www.bmj.
tracheal secretions in critically ill [Article in German] com/cgi/eletters/324/7336/520
patients. Chest 2005;127:936-941. [Accessed February 2, 2010]
30. White A, Slade P, Hunt C, et al. 37. Maddox J, Randi J, Stewart WW. High 44. Brizzi M, Elia V, Trebbi G, et al. The
Individualised homeopathy as an adjunct dilution experiments a delusion. Nature efficacy of ultramolecular aqueous
in the treatment of childhood asthma: a 1988;334:287-291. dilutions on a wheat germination model
randomised placebo controlled trial. 38. Hirst SJ, Hayes NA, Burridge J, et al. as a function of heat and aging-time.
Thorax 2003;58:317-321. Human basophil degranulation is not Evid Based Complement Alternat Med
31. Fisher P, Chatfield K, Mathie R. triggered by very dilute antiserum 2009 Dec 22. [Epub ahead of print]
Homeopathy in childhood asthma. Thorax against human IgE. Nature http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/
2003;58:827. 1993;366:525-527. content/full/nep217v1 [Accessed
32. Aabel S. Prophylactic and acute treatment 39. Belon P, Cumps J, Ennis M, et al. February 2, 2010]
with the homeopathic medicine, Betula Inhibition of human basophil degranu- 45. Mllinger H, Schneider R, Walach H.
30C for birch pollen allergy: a double- lation by successive histamine dilutions: Homeopathic pathogenetic trials
blind, randomized, placebo-controlled results of a European multi-centre trial. produce specific symptoms different
study of consistency of VAS responses. Br Inflamm Res 1999;48:S17-S18. from placebo. Forsch Komplementmed
Homeopath J 2001;90:73-78. 40. Brown V, Ennis M. Flow-cytometric 2009;16:105-110.
33. Launs L, Kimby CK, Henningsen I, analysis of basophil activation: 46. de Vries MP, van den Bemt L, van der
Fnneb V. An exploratory retrospective inhibition by histamine at conventional Mooren FM, et al. The prevalence of
study of people suffering from hypersen- and homeopathic concentrations. house dust mite (HDM) allergy and the
sitivity illnesses who attend medical or Inflamm Res 2001;50:S47-S48. use of HDM-impermeable bed covers in
classical homeopathic treatment. 41. Belon P, Cumps J, Ennis M, et al. a primary care population of patients
Homeopathy 2006;95:73-80. Histamine dilutions modulate basophil with persistent asthma in the
34. Frenkel M, Hermoni D. Effects of activity. Inflamm Res 2004;53:181-188. Netherlands. Prim Care Respir J
homeopathic intervention on medication 42. Guggisberg AG, Baumgartner SM, 2005;14:210-214.
consumption in atopic and allergic Tschopp CM, Heusser P. Replication
disorders. Altern Ther Health Med study concerning the effects of
2002;8:76-79. homeopathic dilutions of histamine on
35. Poitevin B, Davenas E, Benveniste J. In human basophil degranulation in vitro.
vitro immunological degranulation of Complement Ther Med 2005;13:91-100.
human basophils is modulated by lung 43. Chirumbolo S, Brizzi M, Ortolani R, et
histamine and Apis mellifica. Br J Clin al. Inhibition of CD203c membrane
Pharmacol 1988;25:439-444. up-regulation in human basophils by
36. Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J, et al. high dilutions of histamine: a con-
Human basophil degranulation triggered trolled replication study. Inflamm Res
by very dilute antiserum against IgE. 2009;58:755-764.
Nature 1988;333:816-818.
Erratum:
Thyroid Disruption: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications in Human Health;
Altern Med Rev 2009;14(4):338