You are on page 1of 6

DEFENDANT SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

RECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY - PERPETRATION OF ILLEGAL ACTS

1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Judge

Sheri Polster Chappell (“Chappell”) in her private individual capacity and official capacity.

Defendant Chappell’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and

official capacity.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND COMMUNICATIONS OF CRIME INFORMATION

2. Maliciously, Defendant Chappell obstructed and prevented Plaintiffs’ communications of

crime information relating to the recorded commission of felonies by, e.g., Defendant

Forger K. M. Wilkinson, and Defendant Attorneys Jack N. Peterson and Sherri L. Johnson.

ALTERATION, DESTRUCTION, AND CONCEALMENT OF PUBLIC RECORDS

3. With corrupt intent to obtain a benefit, Defendant Corrupt Chappell illegally altered,

destroyed and/or concealed public records. In particular, Chappell practiced the record

policy and custom of having Plaintiffs’ pleadings disappear from the Docket after they had

been filed.

FALSIFICATIONS OF “lien”

4. With corrupt intent to obtain unlawful benefits, Defendant Crooked Chappell falsified a

“lien” in the record absence of any mandated “judgment” “received” by this Court in Case

No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Because of the lack of any recorded “judgment”, nothing could have

possibly become a “lien”. See § 55.10, Fla. Stat.

FALSIFICATION OF “ORDERS”

5. Crooked Chappell falsified “motions” and “orders”. E.g., on 02/01/10, Corrupt Chappell

falsified a “motion for sanctions for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal”, Doc. # 424, Case
No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Defendant Whore Chappell knew and fraudulently concealed that Def.

Forger Wilkinson had never filed any “motion for sanctions for a frivolous appeal”,

Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Corrupt Chappell concealed that any time to file the non-existent “Rule 38

motion” had expired on 08/08/2009. See 11th Cir. R. 38-1 and Dockets.

CAUSING OTHERS TO FALSIFY OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS

6. On or around 02/01/10, Def. Corrupt Chappell caused the Co-Defendant Clerk of this Court

to falsify an official document and “issue” a facially fraudulent “writ of execution”, Doc. #

424, p. 2, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. In said bogus “order”, Def. Chappell brazenly

falsified:

“The motion was referred to this Court by the District Court on January 26, 2009.”

INTIMIDATION, HARASSMENT, AND OBSTRUCTION OF ADJUDICATION

7. Def. Forger Wilkinson’s forgeries of “land parcels”, which neither Corrupt Chappell nor

anyone else could possibly find on the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Plat of Survey, PB 3 PG 25, were

fully supported by the law. Whore Chappell’s “order”, Doc.# 424, was without any “legal

merit” and for record improper purposes such as, e.g., to harass, intimidate, and threaten

the Plaintiffs and to cause unnecessary delay and needlessly increase the cost of litigation.

CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE & PERPETRATE FRAUD ON COURT

8. Any “Rule 27-4 motion” would have had to appear on the official Docket but never did.

Any “Rule 27-4 motion” would have required the following but never did:

“(2) Contents of a Motion.

(A) Grounds and relief sought. A motion must state with particularity the grounds

for the motion, the relief sought, and the legal argument necessary to support it.

(B) Accompanying documents.

2
(i) Any affidavit or other paper necessary to support a motion must be served and

filed with the motion.

(ii) An affidavit must contain only factual information, not legal argument.

(iii) A motion seeking substantive relief must include a copy of the trial court’s

opinion or agency’s decision as a separate exhibit.”

9. Crooked Chappell concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson

a. Never “stated” any “grounds” and “legal argument necessary”;

b. Forged, e.g., “land parcels”, maps;

c. Falsified “real property data” to extort property worth Hundreds of Millions of Dollars

in 2007.

CONSPIRACY TO COERCE & EXTORT

10. Corrupt Chappell conspired with Defendant Forger Wilkinson to expressly “discourage”

and coerce Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecuting and communicating the commission of

felonies by Government Officials and to extort:

“5. In order to discourage the Appellant from engaging in the same practices in this

Court, the Appellee would respectfully request that this Court require the Appellant to

pay a monetary penalty into the Court for filing his frivolous motion to strike.” See

Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 386-2, p. 2.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF PAID “$24.30” JUDGMENT

11. Corrupt Chappell fraudulently concealed the paid “$24.30” “judgment” “issued as mandate

on 06/11/2009” in Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Fed.R.App.P. 39.

FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION OF “BILL OF COST”

3
12. Corrupt Chappell concealed that Defendant Forger Wilkinson had never, and could have

never possibly filed any “$5,000” “bill of cost” and “Rule 38 motion”. Corrupt Chappell

concealed that any time to file the non-existent “Rule 38 motion” had expired on

08/08/2009. See certified Dockets and 11th Cir. R. 38-1.

13. Crooked Chappell concocted a “Rule 38 motion” for criminal and illicit purposes of

extorting fees and property from the Plaintiff corruption victims and whistleblowers.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF WILKINSON’S FORGED “LAND PARCELS”

14. Recklessly, Defendant Chappell concealed Defendant Forger K. M. Wilkinson’s facially

forged “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”.

COVER UP FOR DEFENDANT FORGER WILKINSON

15. In exchange for bribes, Defendant Whore Chappell covered up for Co-Defendant Forger

Kenneth M. Wilkinson under fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., purported “frivolity” and

“Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 violations”.

16. On, e.g., 11/07/2007, Corrupt Chappell obstructed Plaintiff(s)’ communications of conclusive

proof of the commission of felonies by the Defendant in Chappell’s own Court. The

Transcript of said 11/07/2007 Court Hearing conclusively proved public corruption and

Chappell’s criminal and illegal concealment of public corruption information under oath.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD FALSIFICATIONS

17. With corrupt intent to receive illegal benefits, Defendant Corrupt Chappell conspired with

other Officials and Defendants to conceal the record forgeries of said fake “land parcels”.

Chappell knew that Defendant Forger Wilkinson’s forged “land parcels” could not be found

on the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3 Page 25.

4
BRIBERY

18. Defendant Crooked Chappell accepted Defendants’ bribes, and in exchange, fixed

Plaintiffs’ Cases under fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., lack of jurisdiction even though

Chappell knew that the U.S. Courts had jurisdiction over any and all claims against the U.S.

Agents and Defendants.

19. For bribes, corrupt Chappell fabricated that Plaintiffs’ conclusively proven allegations of

said forgeries were purportedly “frivolous”, covered up for Defendant corrupt Officials, and

concealed their record crimes.

FALSIFICATION OF “writ of execution”

20. With corrupt intent to obtain unlawful benefits for Government Officials, Defendant

Crooked Chappell falsified a “writ of execution” and/or “judgment” for illegal purposes of

extorting money and property from the Plaintiffs.

FALSIFICATION OF “regulation”

21. With corrupt intent to obtain illegal benefits for Government Officials, Defendant Crooked

Chappell falsified a “regulation” and/or “law” for criminal and illegal purposes of extorting

fees and property from the Plaintiffs.

FALSIFICATION OF “Rule 38 motion”

22. Defendant Crooked Chappell falsified a “Rule 38 motion”, which she knew Defendant

Forger K. M. Wilkinson had never filed in the 11th Circuit.

EXTORTION

23. In exchange for bribes, Defendant Chappell extorted fees and property from the Plaintiff

corruption victims.

5
MISUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE, CONCEALMENT, AND COVER UP

24. In exchange for bribes, Defendant Whore Chappell obstructed, delayed, and prevented the

communications of judicial and Government corruption information relating to the

commission of felonies by, e.g., U.S. Agents J. E. Steele, S. Polster Chappell, M. A. Pizzo,

R. A. Lazzara, and Def. record Forger of “land parcels” K. M. Wilkinson, and Crooked

Attorney Jack N. Peterson, § 838.022 (1)(c), Fla. Stat. …