Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

DEFENDANT STANLEY F.

BIRCH (JR)

RECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY - PERPETRATION OF ILLICIT ACTS

1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant Corrupt U.S. Circuit Judge

Stanley F. Birch, Jr., in his private individual capacity and official capacity. Defendant

Birch’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and official capacity.

FABRICATIONS OF “RULE 38 MOTION”

2. Defendant Crooked Judge Birch fabricated a “Rule 38 Motion” by Defendant Forger K. M.

Wilkinson. No “Rule 38 motion” by Def. Forger Wilkinson could be found in the official

records of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

CONSPIRACY TO FABRICATE “RULE 38 MOTION”

3. Def. Corrupt Birch conspired with other Officials to fabricate a “Rule 38 Motion”, which

Defendant Forger K. M. Wilkinson had never signed and/or filed.

FALSIFICATION OF “ORDERS”

4. Crooked Birch falsified “motions” and “orders”. E.g., on 03/05/09, Corrupt Birch falsified a

motion for sanctions for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal, Doc. # 386-4, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228.

5. Corrupt Birch knew that the fraudulently pretended “grant” of a non-existent “motion”

was a fraud and extortion scheme on the public record.

6. Defendant Birch knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson had never

filed any motion for sanctions for a frivolous appeal, Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Defendant Corrupt

Birch concealed that any time to file the non-existent “Rule 38 motion” had expired on

08/08/2009. See 11th Cir. R. 38-1 and Dockets.


CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT

7. Crooked Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to extort fees and Plaintiffs’

property under fraudulent pretenses of a fictitious “Rule 38 Motion”, which Def. Birch

knew had never existed.

CAUSING DEFENDANT CIRCUIT CLERK OF COURT TO FALSIFY ENTRIES

8. Def. Crooked Birch caused the Defendant Clerk of the U.S. Circuit Court to falsify an

“entry” of a “Rule 38 motion”, which had never existed or been filed and signed by

Defendant Appellee “land parcel” Forger K. M. Wilkinson.

CONSPIRACY TO CAUSE DEF. CIRCUIT CLERK TO FALSIFY DOCKET

9. Defendant Crooked Circuit Judge Birch conspired with other Judges, Defendants, judicial

panelists, and Officials to falsify docket entries and in particular, falsify a “Rule 38 motion”

“entry”.

RECORD FRAUD AND EXTORTION

10. Defendant Birch knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson had never

submitted and/or filed any “bill of costs” for “attorney’s fees” or “costs” in the amount of

“$5,000.00”.

DECEPTION & TRICKERY

11. Def. Corrupt Judge Birch deceived the 11th Circuit about the record lack of any “costs” in

the amount of “$5,000.00” and arbitrarily and capriciously fabricated “$5,000.00” in a

publicly recorded conspiracy to extort fees and Plaintiff whistleblowers’ property.

2
CONSPIRACY TO RETALIATE AGAINST PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS

12. Defendant Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to retaliate against the

Plaintiffs under color of “frivolity” and a fictitious “Rule 38 motion” for criminal purposes of

extorting fees and property from the Plaintiffs.

CONSPIRACY TO COERCE THE PLAINTIFF RECORD OWNERS

13. Defendant Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to coerce the Plaintiffs to

refrain from prosecuting and communicating the commission of publicly recorded

Government crimes under color of “frivolity” and a fictitious “Rule 38 motion” for criminal

purposes of extorting fees and property …

Вам также может понравиться