Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BIRCH (JR)
1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant Corrupt U.S. Circuit Judge
Stanley F. Birch, Jr., in his private individual capacity and official capacity. Defendant
Birch’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and official capacity.
Wilkinson. No “Rule 38 motion” by Def. Forger Wilkinson could be found in the official
3. Def. Corrupt Birch conspired with other Officials to fabricate a “Rule 38 Motion”, which
FALSIFICATION OF “ORDERS”
4. Crooked Birch falsified “motions” and “orders”. E.g., on 03/05/09, Corrupt Birch falsified a
motion for sanctions for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal, Doc. # 386-4, Case No.
2:2007-cv-00228.
5. Corrupt Birch knew that the fraudulently pretended “grant” of a non-existent “motion”
6. Defendant Birch knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson had never
filed any motion for sanctions for a frivolous appeal, Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Defendant Corrupt
Birch concealed that any time to file the non-existent “Rule 38 motion” had expired on
7. Crooked Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to extort fees and Plaintiffs’
property under fraudulent pretenses of a fictitious “Rule 38 Motion”, which Def. Birch
8. Def. Crooked Birch caused the Defendant Clerk of the U.S. Circuit Court to falsify an
“entry” of a “Rule 38 motion”, which had never existed or been filed and signed by
9. Defendant Crooked Circuit Judge Birch conspired with other Judges, Defendants, judicial
panelists, and Officials to falsify docket entries and in particular, falsify a “Rule 38 motion”
“entry”.
10. Defendant Birch knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson had never
submitted and/or filed any “bill of costs” for “attorney’s fees” or “costs” in the amount of
“$5,000.00”.
11. Def. Corrupt Judge Birch deceived the 11th Circuit about the record lack of any “costs” in
2
CONSPIRACY TO RETALIATE AGAINST PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS
12. Defendant Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to retaliate against the
Plaintiffs under color of “frivolity” and a fictitious “Rule 38 motion” for criminal purposes of
13. Defendant Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to coerce the Plaintiffs to
Government crimes under color of “frivolity” and a fictitious “Rule 38 motion” for criminal