Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ARNE KÖNIG
President
15 July 2010
We write to you on behalf of the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), the regional
group of the International Federation of Journalists representing more than 260.000
journalists across Europe, including all EU Member States.
We would like to draw your attention to the growing threat to press freedom caused by the
EU Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC), the so-called “big brother” legislation that
allows telecommunications companies to store data of all of their customers'
communications. The journalists’ community together with civil society groups has felt the
increasing threat posed by the Directive on press freedom in Europe.
With this letter, we wish you could put forward the concerns of journalists and civil society
groups on press freedom and ask the Commission to make the Directive optional for
Member States during the review of the Directive.
The Directive creates a process for recording details of who communicated with whom via
various electronic communications systems. In the case of mobile phone calls and SMS
messages, the respective location of the users is also recorded. In combination with other
data, Internet usage is also to be made traceable.
The EFJ and its affiliates in the Member States, together with other European and national
civil society groups believe that such an invasive surveillance on the entire population is
unacceptable and violated the fundamental right of privacy as laid down in Article 8 of the
European Convention on Human Rights. With a data retention regime in place, sensitive
information about social and business contacts including those of journalists is collected in
the absence of any suspicion.
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has adopted important standard-
setting texts designed to assist Member States in this respect, including: Guidelines on
human rights and the fight against terrorism (11 July 2002); Declaration on freedom of
expression and information in the media in the context of the fight against terrorism (2
March 2005); Guidelines on protecting freedom of expression and information in times of
crisis (26 September 2007).
Legal experts expect the European Court of Justice to follow the Constitutional Court of
Romania as well as the European Court of Human Rights’ Marper judgement and declare
the retention of telecommunications data in the absence of any suspicion incompatible
with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
As representatives of journalists together with civil society groups we reject the Directive
on telecommunications data retention. We would highly appreciate it if you could address
our concerns on press freedom with regard to the Directive to the Commission during the
review processes.
Please find enclosed the following questions we wish you to put forwards to the
Commission:
2. The blanket collection of all telecommunications data deters informants from passing
confidential information of public interest to journalists by telephone, fax or the Internet.
One in 14 journalists says that data retention has negative effects on their work.
3. The Constitutional Court of Romania decided in 2009 that blanket retention of all
communications data violates fundamental rights (http://twiturl.de/DRromania). Is the
Commission considering making the Directive optional so that Member States can comply
with their constitutions?
Thank you very much for taking these proposals into account. If you have any questions,
do not hesitate to call our European office (contact: renate.schroeder@ifj.org).
Yours Sincerely,