Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TCHL 878-99
1) Although there is familiarity and some advantages to using a 100 point scale
for grading, there are definite disadvantages to using this grading schema. The
main problem with utilizing a 100 point scale is that the scale is not conducive to
choice, fill in the blank and true-false questions followed by short answer or essay
questions. In a 100 point system it is necessary for the teacher to assign point
values to each individual question and then to determine the total score for the
assessment the teacher simply adds up the point values to obtain the final score.
score that the student receives may not be reflective of their mastery of the
material.
Another problem with the 100 point scale is that it leaves a lot of room for
textbook there is a very clear example that showed that different teachers assign
scores very differently from one another. In the sample test, the same test results
received anywhere from a 40% to an 80%. Its insane to realize that the same
answers from a student might receive a failing grade or an above average grade
accomplishment of students to teachers, parents, and other faculty the grades must
be reflective of the actual learning of the student. Therefore, its important to realize
that there are definite problems in the use of a 100 point scale, and it could be
2) There are several things to keep in mind while designing a grading scale. The
primary goal for writing the scale should be to create a means of accurately relating
the progress of the student in a clear and meaningful way. The textbook suggests
using a scale that ranges from 0.0 to 4.0. At a 3.0 on this scale the student has met
the learning objectives. As you move to either higher or lower than the 3.0 the
progress of the student becomes more complex or simpler from the desired goal. At
a 4.0 the student has demonstrated mastery of all learning objectives, and can
apply this knowledge in more complex scenarios. Oppositely, at the 2.0 the student
hasnt met the learning goals required, but can apply their knowledge to simpler
scenarios. At 1.0 the student can only demonstrate knowledge when given guidance
and helped, and at 0.0 the student has no success even with assistance.
In order to write a good scale one must first have access to a list of good
standards required for the class. The standards can either be provided by the
district or the school, or if that is not the case it might be best to develop the
standards with other teachers of the same curriculum. Once the standards have
been established, you can begin to write the scale. Put the expected standard at 3.0
on the scale, and then brainstorm ways that students can show competency for
knowledge and application that is more complex than the standard, and then in
turn, less complex than the standard. Once these two levels have been ironed out,
place the more complex learning goal at 4.0 on the scale and the simpler learning
goal at 2.0 on the scale. Level 1.0 is almost always defined by the student
demonstrating the 2.0 goal, but with assistance. Level 0.0 is defined as the student
each level, or even dividing it by three, can allow all parties involved to have a
better understanding of the progress of the student, and what to work on to achieve
3) Having students re-write standards in their own words can be very helpful. In
order for grading to be completely fair, the system needs to be in the open and not
hidden from the students. Even though most teachers place their grading system
front and center in the syllabus at the beginning of the year, this does not
guarantee that the student understands what exactly is expected from them
throughout the class. When a teacher requires a student to re-write the standards in
their own words the teacher and the student can come to an understanding about
demonstrations. Thereby when the student has concerns or questions about why
they received the score that they did, the teacher can clearly point to the student
4) The first step to translate a previously used assessment into a grading scale
is to look at the questions individually and assess whether the question is probing
the students knowledge of the content at the 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0 levels. Once those
questions have been designated into specific categories, the teacher can use those
questions to assess the students knowledge of that content and at what level the
flesh out the test in specific areas. If a teacher previously made tests that were
much harder than needed, there might be too many 4.0 level questions, and little to
no 2.0 level questions. Therefore, the teacher might have to remove some 4.0
questions and develop questions that would test the students knowledge of simpler
complex. In an opposite example, a test might have had a lot of easier questions. In
this case, it would be important for the teacher to add some questions that test for
complex knowledge in order to really assess if the student has reached the 4.0 level
in their knowledge.
For time and effort its important to re-use as many resources as possible
when transitioning to a grading scale. However, its important to remember that the
entire purpose of the change is to be able to clearly assess students skill in relation
5) There were a lot of items in the videos in this module that caught my
Its obvious that he has spent his life cultivating a love of learning for himself and
his students. It seemed to me that the central focus of the teaching strategy that he
subscribes to is that the learning progression of his students is the whole point of
teaching. He pointed out time and again the shortcomings in the traditional
I found it especially insightful the several times that he called teachers to the
carpet. He pointed out that some teachers rely on thinking along the lines of this is
how the world works or they need to learn responsibility. Mr. Wormeli consistently
pointed out the flaws in this thinking, and the destructive nature to the learning
learning. Since then Ive done a lot of thinking about how to apply this to a
classroom that I might be responsible for. I really enjoyed the videos in this module,
because they helped answer a lot of questions that I had about how to apply
previous teaching job dealing with late assignments. The district had the policy that
students could redo ANY assignment or test up to two weeks after the semester was
over. Because I hadnt known any different, I was pretty invested in the thinking that
Mr. Wormeli points out is incorrect. I thought we were doing a disservice to the
students by allowing them so much slack in regards to their work. However, after
reading more about this theory I realize that the districts policy was not as
they desire to reach. Even though I had ALWAYS thought this about teaching, these
videos really helped me realize that some of the grading systems that Ive come to