Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Journal of Luminescence
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jlumin
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: We report on the shell-to-core carrier-transfer in GaAs/Al0.1Ga0.9As core-shell nanowires grown on
Received 26 August 2013 Si(1 0 0) substrates via molecular beam epitaxy. The nanowires are dominantly zincblende and are tilted
Received in revised form with respect to the substrate surface. Photoluminescence (PL) excitation spectrosocopy at 77 K revealed an
2 June 2014
abrupt increase in the GaAs PL intensity at excitation above the Al0.1Ga0.9As shell bandgap which is attributed
Accepted 5 June 2014
Available online 16 June 2014
to shell to core carrier-transfer. More carriers from the Al0.1Ga0.9As transfer to the GaAs at T490 K, as
observed in the time-resolved PL and temperature dependence of the relative PL intensities of GaAs and
Keywords: Al0.1Ga0.9As due to the ionization of the traps within the Al0.1Ga0.9As. Using a coupled rate equation model
IIIV semiconductors that takes into account shell to core carrier-transfer, the average recombination time constants of Al0.1Ga0.9As
Carrier transfer
shell rec,s 400 ps (580 ps) and GaAs core rec,c 600 ps (970 ps) were obtained from the time-resolved PL at
Nanowires
300 K (77 K). Carrier-transfer time constants CT 50 ps (55 ps) at 300 K (77 K) were also obtained.
Time-resolved luminescence
& 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2014.06.008
0022-2313/& 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
28 M.H. Balgos et al. / Journal of Luminescence 155 (2014) 2731
Fig. 3. (a) GaAs core PLE spectrum at 77 K. Abrupt increase of PL at excitations above the Al0.1Ga0.9As bandgap indicates carrier transfer. (b) Mechanism for the shell to core
carrier transfer.
Fig. 4. Time resolved photoluminescence at 77 K and 300 K of the (a) GaAs core and (b) AlGaAs shell of the core-shell nanowires. Black solid lines are ts to the coupled rate
equation (Eqs. (1a) and (1b)). The recombination time constants rec and carrier transfer time constants CT obtained from the ts are included in the gure.
The n-doped GaAs cap is too thin to have a signicant effect on the carriers to the band edges. The second term represents the
PLE signal. radiative (R) and nonradiative (NR) recombination with time
We further investigated the CT mechanism using TRPL. Fig. 4a constant 1/rec 1/R 1/NR. The last term accounts for of the
and b shows the TRPL spectra of GaAs and Al0.1Ga0.9As, respec- CT mechanism. The term in brackets is to incorporate the nite
tively, at 300 K and 77 K. The spectra were obtained by taking a number of carriers Nmax from Al0.1Ga0.9As that can transfer.
horizontal segment in the streak image with height equal to the Physically, only carriers near the Al0.1Ga0.9AsGaAs interface can
full-width at half maximum of the PL signal. All spectra were tted readily transfer; those away from the interface have to initially
using a coupled differential rate equation model to represent the diffuse before they can undergo CT. Simultaneously, in momentum
temporal carrier evolution for the Al0.1Ga0.9As shell and GaAs core: space, these carriers thermalize to reach the band edges before
they recombine. Since thermalization is a faster process (in the
d N c t N ex;c Nc N s N max N CT
1a order of femtoseconds [35]) than diffusion, then recombination is
dt rc rec;c CT N max
favored at longer timescales. In our model, when NCT reaches Nmax,
the CT process stops (last term in Eqs. (1a) and (1b) goes to zero)
d N s t N ex;s Ns N s N max NCT
1b leaving recombination as the only carrier exit path in the shell and
dt rs rec;s CT Nmax
the optical excitation as the only source of carriers in the core.
where the subscripts s and c denote shell and core, respectively. The black solid lines in Fig. 4a and b are the least square ts of
N is the number of carriers, Nex is the initial number of excited Eqs. (1a) and (1b), respectively. It is important to note that r is
carriers due to the optical excitation, r is the rise time constant, xed at 10 ps equivalent to the resolution of our TRPL setup. This
rec is the recombination time constant, CT is the transfer time value is reasonable since the thermalization of the carriers,
constant, Nmax is the maximum number of carriers that can characterized by r is in the order of femtoseconds [34] and is
transfer, and NCT is the number of carriers that transferred. Eqs. beyond the resolution of our TRPL setup.
(1a) and (1b) are modied generationrecombination rate equa- For the GaAs core (Fig. 4a), the TRPL rise has a single rate. Since
tions for NWs [34]. Generation manifests as the TRPL rise while carriers from Al0.1Ga0.9As transfer to GaAs, we expect a double rise
recombination manifests as the TRPL decay. The rst term in the characterized by two different time constants one from the
right-hand-side of Eqs. (1a) and (1b) indicates addition of carriers optical excitation and one from the CT. The single TRPL rise may be
via optical excitation and the subsequent thermalization of the explained by the relative contribution to the number of carriers of
30 M.H. Balgos et al. / Journal of Luminescence 155 (2014) 2731
Fig. 5. (a) Integrated PL intensity versus inverse temperature of the AlGaAs shell. Activation energy Ea 31.4 meV corresponds to the ionization of traps within the AlGaAs.
(b) Temperature dependent GaAsAlGaAs PL intensity ratio showing an increase at 90 K.
the two processes. More carriers are produced via optical excita- the GaAsAl0.1Ga0.9As PL intensity ratio (PLIR) as a function of
tion, hence, the TRPL rise from the CT is swamped and is not temperature. Owing to the same growth conditions, the defects
observed. The TRPL of GaAs at both temperatures is characterized incorporated in GaAs and AlGaAs have minimal difference. The PL
by a single TRPL decay rate. We attribute the decay to carrier signal for GaAs and Al0.1Ga0.9As therefore should quench at almost
recombination within the GaAs, The faster decay of 600 ps at the same rate with temperature resulting to a constant PLIR if they
300 K is due to signicant NR recombination at 300 K. Since rec,c are to be treated independently. Constant PLIR is seen at 1070 K
which is a combined effect of R and NR recombination [36], that is, as indicated by the horizontal dash line in Fig. 5b. At 90150 K,
1/rec 1/R 1/NR, we observe a longer time constant of 970 ps at however, there is an apparent increase in the PLIR as indicated by
77 K where NR is minimized and 1/NR approaches zero. The the slanted dash line. At these temperatures, the GaAs PL intensity
values obtained at 300 K and 77 K are within the range of reported increases relatively to the Al0.1Ga0.9As. More carriers from the
carrier lifetime values for nearly intrinsic exciton lifetimes of GaAs Al0.1Ga0.9As transferred to GaAs at T 490 K. We note that
NWs (0.051.1 ns) reported by Perera et al. [37]. the intersection of the horizontal and slanted line at 90K
For the Al0.1Ga0.9As shell (Fig. 4b), a single exponential TRPL coincides with the activation temperature of the defects within
rise, due to the optical excitation, is observed at 77 K and 300 K. the Al0.1Ga0.9As.
The TRPL decay, however, is characterized by a single exponential
decay rate at 77 K and a double exponential (fast and slow) decay
rate at 300 K. We propose that the appearance of the double decay 4. Conclusion
is a consequence of the CT mechanism. We attribute the fast decay
to the combined effect of recombination and carrier transfer while The shell-to-core CT mechanism of an ensemble of dominantly
the slow decay is ascribed to the recombination. Numerical tting zincblende GaAs/AlGaAs CSNWs is investigated through CW-PL,
using Eq. (1a) revealed rec,s of 400 ps at 300 K and 580 ps at 77 K. TRPL and PLE spectroscopy for varying temperatures. PLE provides
A longer rec,s at 77 K is again attributed to the minimized NR strong evidence of the CT mechanism while CW-PL and TRPL
recombination at low temperatures. The transfer time constant CT demonstrate that the CT process is dependent of temperature
is 50 ps and 55 ps for at 300 K and 77 K, respectively. This is mainly because a high number of carriers participate in the CT
similar to the CT time constants of GaAs/AlGaAs separate conne- process at T 490 K. Coupled rate equations are used to t the TRPL
ment heterostructures reported by Morin et al. (19.2 ps at 300 K at 300 K and at 77 K, thereby facilitating the evaluation of the
and 22 ps at 80 K) [38]. Our values of CT show that the CT time is recombination and carrier transfer time constants. The 300 K
almost independent of temperature and cannot explain the double (77 K) average recombination time constants for GaAs core are
decay observed in the 300 K TRPL of Al0.1Ga0.9As. rec,c 600 ps (970 ps) while that of the AlGaAs shell are rec,
As such, the the maximum number of transferred carriers Nmax s 400 ps (580 ps). The CT time constant is determined to be
relative to the initial number of carriers Nex,s (t0) in the shell was CT 50 ps (55 ps) for 300 K (77 K).
investigated. We obtain a value of Nmax/Nex,s(t0) of 0.24 at 77 K
and 0.69 at 300 K. These values show that a higher fraction of
Acknowledgments
excited carriers transfer at 300K than at 77 K. We believe that
defects in the Al0.1Ga0.9As affect the number of carriers that can
This work is supported in part by Grants from PCIEERD-DOST,
transfer. Using an Arrhenius plot of the integrated PL intensity vs
DOST-GIA, and University of the Philippines OVCRD. The authors
inverse temperature (Fig. 5a), we calculate an activation energy
would also like to thank Intel for the donation of the streak
Ea 31 meV for the defects within the AlGaAs at 90 K which can
camera.
be attributed to an electron trap E9 (30 meV) or a hole trap H4
(32 meV) [39]. At 77 K (o90 K), there is still efcient trapping of
carrier by the defects, thus there are not enough transferred References
carriers to produce a double decay. At 300 K, the defects in the
[1] B.R. Huang, Y.K. Yang, T.C. Lin, W.L. Yang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 98 (2012)
shell are already ionized and are not as efcient at trapping
357.
carriers. Thus, more carriers can diffuse until they nally transfer [2] Y. Liang, H. Liang, X. Xiao, S. Hark, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 1199.
to the GaAs. [3] S.L. Wu, J.H. Deng, T. Zhang, R.T. Zheng, G.A. Cheng, Diam. Relat. Mater.
The temperature dependence of the number of carriers avail- 26 (2012) 83.
[4] T. Mrtensson, C.P.T. Svensson, B.A. Wacaser, M.W. Larsson, W. Seifert,
able for transfer to GaAs is investigated using the relative PL K. Deppert, A. Gustafsson, L.R. Wallenberg, L. Samuelson, Nano Lett. 4 (2004)
intensities of GaAs and Al0.1Ga0.9As at 10K300 K. Fig. 5b shows 1987.
M.H. Balgos et al. / Journal of Luminescence 155 (2014) 2731 31
[5] K. Tomioka, T. Tanaka, S. Hara, K. Hiruma, T. Fukui, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum [24] B. Deveaud, F. Clerot, A. Regreny, K. Fujiwara, K. Mitsunaga, J. Ohta., Appl. Phys.
Electron. 17 (2011) 1112. Lett. 55 (25) (1989) 2646.
[6] G.E. Cirlin, V.G. Dubrovskii, Y.B. Samsonenko, A.D. Bouravleuv, K. Durose, [25] R.S. Wagner, W.C. Ellis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 4 (5) (1964) 89.
Y.Y. Proskuryakov, B. Mendes, L. Bowen, M.A. Kaliteevski, M.A. Kaliteevski, [26] H.L. Hartnagel, R. Riemenschneider, Properties of Aluminium Gallium
D. Zeze, Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 035302. Arsenide, in: S. Adachi (Ed.), INSPEC, the Institution of Electrical Engineers,
[7] L.C. Chuang, M. Moewe, S. Crankshaw, C. Chang-Hasnain, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 London, United Kingdom, 1993, p. 239.
(2008) 013121. [27] J.P. Callan, A.M.T. Kim, L. Huang, E. Mazur, Chem. Phys. 251 (2000) 167.
[8] J. Bao, M.A. Zimmler, F. Capasso, X. Wang, Z.F. Ren, Nano Lett. 6 (2006) 1719. [28] Seth A. Fortuna, Li Xiuling, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2) (2010) 024005.
[9] R. Konenkamp, R.C. Word, C. Schlegel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 6004. [29] M.C. Plante, R.R. LaPierre, Au-assisted growth of GaAs nanowires by gas source
[10] S. Gradeak, F. Qian, Y. Li, H.G. Park, C.M. Lieber, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) molecular beam epitaxy: tapering, sidewall faceting and crystal structure,
173111. J. Cryst. Growth 310 (2) (2008) 356.
[11] O. Demichel, M. Heiss, J. Bleuse, H. Mariette, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, Appl. [30] Chen Chen, Shyemaa Shehata, Ccile Fradin, Ray LaPierre, Christophe Couteau,
Phys. Lett. 97 (2010) 201907. Weihs Gregor, Nano Lett. 7 (no. 9) (2007) 2584.
[12] C.Y. Chen, C.A. Lin, M.J. Chen, G.R. Lin, J.H. He, Nanotechnology 20 (2009) [31] Yu B. Bolkhovityanov, Pchelyakov Oleg Petrovich, Phys. Uspekhi 51 (5) (2008)
437.
185605.
[32] Michelle F. Bailon-Somintac, Jasher J. Ibaez, Rafael B. Jaculbia, Regine
[13] X. Jiang, Q. Xiong, S. Nam, F. Qian, Y. Li, C.M. Lieber, Nano Lett. 7 (2007) 3214.
A. Loberternos, Michael J. Defensor, Arnel A. Salvador, Armando S. Somintac,
[14] P. Parkinson, H.J. Joyce, Q. Gao, H.H. Tan, X. Zhang, J. Zou, C. Jagadish, L.M. Herz,
Low temperature photoluminescence and Raman phonon modes of Au-
M.B. Johnston, Nano Lett. 9 (2009) 3349.
catalyzed MBE-grown GaAsAlGaAs coreshell nanowires grown on a pre-
[15] J. Noborisaka, J. Motohisa, S. Hara, T. Fukui, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 093109.
patterned Si (111) substrate, J. Cryst. Growth 314 (1) (2011) 268.
[16] N. Skld, L.S. Karlsson, M.W. Larsson, M.E. Pistol, W. Seifert, J. Trgrdh,
[33] B. Ketterer, M. Heiss, M.J. Livrozet, A. Rudolph, E. Reiger, A. Fontcuberta i
L. Samuelson, Nano Lett. 5 (2005) 1943.
Morral, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 125307.
[17] P. Prete, F. Marzo, P. Paiano, N. Lovergine, G. Salviati, L. Lazzarini, T. Sekiguchi,
[34] L. Smith, H. Jackson, J. Yarrison-Rice, C. Jagadish, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25
J. Cryst. Growth 310 (2008) 5114. (2010) 024010.
[18] O.D.D. Couto Jr., D. Sercombe, J. Puebla, L. Otubo, I.J. Luxmoore, M. Sich, [35] J.P. Callan, A.M-T. Kim, C.A.D. Roeser, E. Mazur, Semiconductors and Semi-
T.J. Elliott, E.A. Chekhovich, L.R. Wilson, M.S. Skolnick, H.Y. Liu, A. metals, in: K.T. Tsen (Ed.), Elsevier B.V., Massachusetts, USA, 2001,
I. Tartakovskii, Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 5269. pp. 151203.
[19] C. Chen, S. Shehata, C. Fradin, R. LaPierre, C. Couteau, G. Weihs, Nano Lett. 7 [36] P.Y. Yu, M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials
(2007) 2584. Properties, fourth ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 2010.
[20] C.H. Chuang, T. Doane, S. Lo, G. Scholes, C. Burda., Measuring electron and hole [37] S. Perera, M.A. Fickenscher, H.E. Jackson, L.M. Smith, J.M. Yarrison-Rice,
transfer in core/shell nanoheterostructures, ACS Nano 5 (7) (2011) 6016. H.J. Joyce, Q. Gao, H.H. Tan, C. Jagadish, X. Zhang, J. Zou, Appl. Phys. Lett.
[21] J. Yoo, B. Chon, W. Tang, T. Joo, L.S. Dang, G.C. Yi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 (2012) 93 (2008) 053110.
223103. [38] S. Morin, B. Deveaud, F. Clerot, K. Fujiwara, K. Mitsunaga, IEEE J. Quantum
[22] B. Deveaud, J. Shah, T.C. Damen, W.T. Tsang., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (22) (1988) Electron. 27 (1991) 1669.
1886. [39] Sheinkman, T.V. Torchinskayaand M.K., Deep Centers In AlGaAs Heteroepitaxial
[23] J.A. Brum, G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B 33 (2) (1986) 1420. Diodes.