Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Leslie Speer
Ottawa University
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION 2
Abstract
A conflict has been present on whether the arts have a place in the school scene. While
some argue that the arts are beneficial to have they should be strictly used for enjoyment and be
separated from academics all together. Others say that there is a real use for the arts in a schools
curriculum. In this paper research based assumptions are made that the fine arts education is
linked to student achievement in other subject areas. This is important to know because the
future of the world is currently in school. The goal should be to equip the future with all of the
necessary tools to achieve more than previous generations. With this research schools can take
necessary actions to implement the arts as they seem fit based on the idea that they are just as
Introduction
achievement. With budget cuts and state standardized testing, schools are faced with the decision
within their district on where they can save time and reduce spending without hindering a childs
education. Many take what seems like the easy way out by cutting their arts education programs.
This has been found to have a negative effect on students and how they academically perform.
With statistically based research the conclusion can be made that there is a link between
academic performance and a students experiences in arts education. Arguments for and against
keeping arts education programs in schools, background on the fine arts, statistics and studies
done on the subject, and ways to improve the issue are all presented in this paper.
Those who argue against the claims that arts education boost academic achievement think
they are not as necessary and more time should be spent on core subjects so test scores are
improved. When time and resources are limited the arts are cut without even looking at the true
educational benefits they provide. Most think the arts are nice to have for their expressive,
creative, emotive, and recreational purposes not their academic strengths (Rabkin). No Child
Left Behind, a national educational reform set in 2006 by the Bush administration, has been a
huge push in raising test scores. To raise these test scores school officials have been cutting fine
arts programs to free up time for extra work in these areas (Davis 2006). Studies and research
that has been done has been showing an undeniable link between the arts and academic
One author concluded (Elliot 1999) that studies between arts education and academic
achievement are not up to par. This author claims that studies that have been done on the
connection between the two do not have a firm basis on the claims they are presenting. The
thought is that the studies often arent set up in a consistent way. Students included in the studies
might be at different academic stages and come from different backgrounds. Other studies the
author claims that are not accurate are ones that are more geared towards core subject
achievement and have nothing to do with the arts at all. Another argument presented by this
author is that the only improvement arts education has made is in what psychologist calls the
conative aspects of cognition. This means the arts are only there for enjoyment and shouldnt be
On the other side of the argument is that the arts are a major component not only to a
balanced well-rounded curriculum for children, but the arts actually help students achieve in the
other subject areas. Those who are in favor of arts education consider every subject area to have
academic importance and this includes the arts. They are all worthy of equal time and effort put
into them and shouldnt be pit against each other when they are all deserving of their own
recognition. Arts education should be just as in depth and serious as other subjects. Subject areas
shouldnt be isolated, integration allows for overlap and this incudes art integration to core
subjects outside of just a fine arts class. In order for subjects to transfer to one another the
education quality needs to be high, every student is deserving of a high-quality arts education
(Rabkin). Music, dancing, and visual arts all play a role in core subjects benefiting the students
greatly (Reeves). Mishook and Kornhaber stated after their research on arts integration, that
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION 5
understanding the arts provides young people with additional ways of making sense of the
world.
Background
Behind the Push for Arts Education-No Child Left Behind and Budget Cuts
Studies and research on the benefits of arts education done over the years has been
conclusive. This was proven when No Child Left Behind (NCLB), a federal mandate for students
to have equitable educational opportunities, was implemented and arts education was included in
the subjects covered in the reform. Arts education was supposed to carry as much weight as the
other subjects or core subjects in the mandate. Even though arts education was included in the
mandate, it was eventually pushed to the side because time in the classroom was focused on
tested subjects (Rabkin). This created direct issues for arts classes. NCLB assessments and
funding changed how teachers approached arts classes, professional development, and
The Center on Education Policy (CEP), a research based organization out of Washington,
concluded that four years after the mandate was put in place 71 percent of school districts
reported that they cut back on time teachers spent on subjects that were not tested to focus on the
ones that were. In some cases, certain schools were skipping subjects all together to make time
for reading and math. A solution proposed was for greater funding for the act. While the demands
pressed on school officials are increased, funding is decreased. Bush called for a 3.8 percent cut
to the Education Department in 2007 and the year before a 1 percent cut. These nationwide
budget cuts caused the funding for nontested subjects to be eliminated first. Doing this allowed
for more funding to go to tested subject areas. Teachers of tested subject areas were even
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION 6
encouraged to cut out the integration of arts in their class time (Beveridge 2010). This
underfunding only added to the stress placed on school officials. If schools are going to be
required to follow federal law they should receive proper federal funding (Davis 2006).
Research done by Cydney Spohn on the effects of NCLB on fine arts programs was
conducted by obtaining teachers experiences from an Ohio school district. The results were that
both arts teachers and nonarts teachers believe instructional time and classroom practices have
been modified to accommodate NCLB. In the study the results were to be expected. Teachers and
school officials were forced to change scheduling to make room for more core subject work,
attention was directed towards improving test scores, and federal funding for education was cut
forcing school officials to funnel what money they did have to core subject areas (Spohn 2008).
In another study done by Peter Miksza of Indiana University, Bloomington, showed there
is a direct link between arts education and funding, instructional time, and specialist arts
teachers. If effort and support wasnt put into these three elements arts programs were set up for
failure. The more support by administration, community members, and parent the more likely
arts programs could prevail and become stronger. Also, students were more motivated by the arts
when they had proper resources. This is where funding plays a role. When the students were
equipped with the proper resources they became more excited and interactive (Miksza 2013).
Major links have been found when researching and compiling information on the idea
that arts contribute to education and development by looking at specific contributions from each
arts discipline. An example would be that the visual arts are found to help writing skills and the
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION 7
visualization work they get in helps support interpretation of text. This research was delicately
put together and published by three Authors, James Catterall of the University of California at
Los Angeles, Lois Hetland of Project Zero at Harvards Graduate School of Education, and Ellen
Winner of Project Zero and Boston University in Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and
Student Achievement and Social Development. Conclusions from their research showed many
great cases for links between experience in the arts and academic achievement. Some of these
links were that music experience helped with spatial reasoning and math and between instrument
learning and SAT scores. Dancing was linked to fluency in creative thinking and to reading
skills. Drama showed a connection with story comprehension, character understanding, and
wriging proficiency. Drama also was found to be a better way for students to comprehend a story
than teacher-led discussion. When looking at multi arts programs multiple connection to reading,
verbal, math skills, and creative thinking were all found. Not only did they find academic
connections but also social ones. These social improvements were especially beneficial to at risk
students who connected to the arts and found a way to learn through the arts which translated to
Research done by Lois Hetland and Ellen Winner, separate from Critical Links: Learning
in the Arts and Student Achievement and Social Development, also showed a strong causal link
between the arts and achievement in non-arts, academic areas. This study was done by doing a
set of 10 meta-analyses. These meta-analyses combine and compares effect sizes across groups
of studies that address similar research questions. From the research the author was able to
conclude that there were three areas that had clear links between arts and academic achievement.
Music had a clear relationship to spatial skills, including performing spatial temporal tasks, and
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION 8
math scores. Drama had a positive impact on childrens verbal ability. Also, that the visual arts
In a study done by the Colorado Department of Education and the Colorado Council on
the Arts it was found that public high schools in Colorado that offer arts education courses have
higher state tests scores in reading, writing, and science than the public schools that dont offer
arts courses. Despite differences in socioeconomic statuses, higher test scores were found in
Arts education shouldnt and hasnt been an isolated activity. Yes, there should be
separate times specified just for the arts but also, they should be integrated into other classes.
Positive educational effects have been found when drama integration and multi-arts integration is
implemented. Also, there is potential positive effects for dance integration, visual arts
integration, arts integration for students with disabilities, and arts integration to improve the
school environment (Robinson 2013). Arts education is not always integrated as discussed in the
research done by Jacob J. Mishook and Mindy L. Kornhaver. Another good point brought up in
their research was that even though arts education is supposed to be considered a core subject to
what standard are they held? Core subjects usually have standardized test attached to them but
what about the arts. Without saying they need to be tested they should at least be held
accountable since the research shows the great benefit of arts education. In the research
conducted by these two authors they searched out the accountability of arts integration. Most
schools researched in this study showed art integration in many areas. This was before budget
cuts attached to NCLB and the push for standardized tests. After these elements were thrown into
the mix a decline in arts integration started to surface (Mishook & Kornhaber 2006).
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION 9
The reduction of arts programs needs to be re-analyzed. In order for this reduction to
stop, old research that shows the positive impact the arts have on academics isnt enough newer
research needs to continue to find even more conclusive results. Researchers should see what
happens when the arts are given a serious role in a schools curriculum. Further research on this
theory with positive results could really get school officials and possibly even the government on
Research on arts integration would be more accessible if more funding was put towards
the arts. The increase in funding has to be a priority so the arts are able to take a more dominant
role in the school system. With an increase in funding for the arts without a high stakes
curriculum or testing pressure would motivate schools to implement arts even more. If school
districts had more flexibility for their use of funding that would also benefit the cause (Soph
2008).
Art Viewing
Art viewing as discussed in the research conducted by Angela Eckhoff is a simple way in
which students can benefit from visual arts with little resources. In order to make art viewing a
strategies for implementing art appreciation activities (Eckhoff 2008). This goes for more than
just visual arts experiences. More resources and time need to be put into the arts education so the
teachers are better educated and equipped to give students the education they deserve.
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION
10
Conclusion
From the studies presented in this paper it is safe to say arts education benefits other
subject areas academic achievement. Although not all areas of the arts have conclusive data to
support their benefits, the areas that do have solid data are important to observe and should be
taken seriously. The future generations could really benefit from arts education and integration.
Research continued on the links between academic achievement and arts education can only be
assumed to have positive results. More research done on art focused schools with greater funding
and resources could persuade those schools lacking in the arts programs to step it up.
IMPORTANCE OF ARTS EDUCATION
11
Works Cited
Beveridge, T. (2010). No Child Left Behind and Fine Arts Classes. Arts Education Policy
Review, 111(1), 4-7. Doi:10. 1080/10903228090
Davis, M.R. (2006). Study: NCLB Leads to Curbs for Some Subjects. Education Week, 25(30),
5-14.
Eckhoff, A. (2008). The Importance of Art Viewing Experiences in Early Childhood Visual Arts:
The Exploration of a Master Art Teachers Strategies for Meaningful Early Arts
Experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(5), 463-472. Doi:10.1007/s10643-
007-0216-1
Eisner, E. W. (1999). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement?. Clearing House,
72(3), 143.
Elliot, I. (1999). Learning Through the Arts. (Cover story). Teaching Pre K-8, 30(2), 38.
Fehr, R.C. (2008). Colorado Finds Links Between Arts Education and Test Scores. Music
Educators Journal, 95(2), 23.
Heatland, L., & Winner, E. (2001). The Arts and Academic Achievement: What the Evidence
Shows. Arts Education Policy Review, 102(5), 3.
Miksza, P. (2013). Arts Education Advocacy: The Relative Effects of School-Level Influences
on Resources for Arts Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(1), 25-32.
Mishook, J.J., & Kornhaber, M.L. (2006). Arts Integration in an Era of Accountability. Arts
Education Policy Review, (4), 3-11.
Rabkin, N., Rose, D., & M. P. (n.d.). Connections between Education in the Arts and Student
Achievement. Retrieved April 11, 2017, from http://www.giarts.org/article/connections-
between-education-arts-and-student-achievement
Reeves, D. (2007). Academics and the Arts. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 80-81.
Spohn, C. (2008). Teacher Perspectives on No Child Left Behind and Arts Education: A Case
Study. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 3-12.
Robinson, A.H. (2013). Arts Integration and the Success of Disadvantaged Students: A Research
Evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(4), 191-204.