Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Emmanuel C. Revilla
SHS Math and Science Instructor
STI College San Pablo
Earth Science - the study of the Earth and its neighbors in space. (geology.com)
- the collection of different sciences that study everything there is to know about
the earth. It encompasses the history, composition, structure and the dynamic
processes taking place on Earth.
Main Branches of Earth Science
1. Geology the study of the rock portion of the Earth, its interior, and surface processes.
2. Meteorology the study of the atmosphere and how it changes.
3. Oceanography the study of the oceans that cover most of the Earths surface.
4. Astronomy - the study of Earths motions and motions of objects beyond Earth, such as
planets and stars.
ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE
Cosmology sub-branch of astronomy, studies how the universe started, what it is made of,
and how it changes.
Religious Cosmology - is a way of explaining the origin, the history and the evolution of the
cosmos or universe based on the religious mythology of a specific tradition.
Modern Theories on the Origin of the Universe
1. BIG BANG THEORY (Current Accepted Model on the Formation of the Universe)
Proponent: Belgian Roman Catholic Priest and Physicist Georges Lemaitre (1927)
He called it Hypothesis of the Primeval Atom or Cosmic Egg.
Claims:
The universe is expanding, originating from an infinitely tiny, infinitely dense point called
singularity around 14 billion years ago. (Based on Albert Einsteins Theory of Relativity)
The universe has a beginning, but matter is not present yet, just pure energy.
After the initial expansion, the theory maintains that universe cooled sufficiently to allow
the formation of subatomic particles, and later simple atoms. Giant clouds of these
primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies.
The universe is evolving.
The universe has an end.
Supported by Edwin Hubbles discovery of a continuously expanding universe through
galactic redshift (1929) and the discovery of the CMBR by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson
in 1965.
Note: Despite the fact that it is called big bang, it is not an explosion, but rather an expansion of
space.
Objections:
According to some scientists, nothingness cannot
pack together. It would have no way to push itself
into a pile. Also, a vacuum has no density. It is said
that the nothingness got very dense, and that is why
it exploded. But a total vacuum is the opposite of
total density. In addition, there would be no ignition
to explode nothingness. No fire and no match. It
could not be a chemical explosion, for no chemicals
existed. It could not be a nuclear explosion, for there
were no atoms!
It left several questions unanswered: Where did the
super dense core come from? How and why did the
universe expand? What caused the galaxies to form?
What existed before the Big Bang?
2. STEADY STATE THEORY (Also known as Infinite Universe Theory or Continuous Creation)
Proponents: Astronomers Fred Hoyle, Thomas Gold and Hermann Bondi (Late 1940s)
It was first proposed by the English Physicist Sir James Jeans in the 1920s, but was
later reformulated by the three astronomers in 1940s.
Claims:
The universe is expanding, has no beginning and end.
The universe has always been and will always be the same. This was based on the
cosmological principle that the universe is uniform in space and has unchanging time.
New matter is created as the universe expands (keeping the density the same) and that
the age of the stars will stay the same.
Objections:
It violates the Law of Conservation of Matter
and Energy.
The discovery of quasars, the highly
luminous cores of very distant galaxies,
proved that the older galaxies were indeed
located exceedingly farther than the young
galaxies. This discovery was in favor of the
big bang theory.
The discovery of the cosmic microwave
background radiation, the afterglow of the
big bang, had absolutely no reason to exist
if steady state were true.
* In a British radio broadcast, Hoyle coined the term "big bang" somewhat derisively to explain the
opposing theory.
Objections:
How did the lumps of hot gas contract to form planets? (Hot gas expand and do not
contract.)
Encounters between stars are extremely rare, so rare as to be improbable in the lifetime of
the Universe (15 billion years).
3. Protoplanet Hypothesis
Proponent: Developed independently by two astronomers Carl von Weizsacker (1912) and
Gerard Kuiper (1945).
Claims:
A new factor was introduced in the form of the existence in the cool gaseous nebula of a
small amount of dust, providing nuclei for the condensation of gas particles into larger
aggregates that could accrete and solidify into the embryo planets.
The hypothesis begins with a fragment separating from an interstellar cloud composed
mainly of hydrogen and helium, with trace amounts of the other elements. With other
fragments of the interstellar cloud presumably following a similar evolution, its central
region, being somewhat more dense, collapsed more rapidly than its outlying parts. This
formed the central portion of the solar nebula, whose outer portion contained a thin disk
of solids within a thicker disk of gases. The original interstellar cloud must have been
rotating, and as it fragmented, rotation was imparted to each fragment. Thus as the
solar nebula contracted, it rotated more rapidly, conserving angular momentum.
The solar nebula grew by accretion as material continued to fall inward from its
surroundings. Large-scale turbulence from gravitational instabilities ruptured the thin
disk into eddies, each containing many small particles. These particles gradually built up
into larger bodies by some combination of adhesive forces. Repeated encounters among
them resulted in the accretion of literally billions of still larger asteroid-sized aggregates
called planetesimals, which orbited the center of the solar nebula. Mutual gravitational
attraction led to further encounters and gradual coalescence into many roughly Moon-
size bodies, which in turn coalesced to form the planets.
Planetesimals must have differed in chemical composition, depending primarily on their
initial distance from the Sun as it formed.
Objections:
The angular momentum distribution problem was not answered. Remember that the
distribution of angular momentum in the Solar System expanded to the entire system,
not just the Sun.
1. The star should survive long enough for its planets to develop life.
Massive stars would have least possibility to be habitable since they can only live for a
relatively short period. Compared to medium-mass stars, such as the sun (yellow dwarf star),
which can survive long enough for life to develop.
2. The planet should exist in a region where water could remain liquid.
The second requires that the planet must be located in the Goldilocks Zone, the region
around a star that has just the right conditions to find liquid water on a planet's surface. Different
stars have different Goldilocks Zone, or habitable zone. Blue stars tend to have farther habitable
zones since they are relatively hotter and red stars have closer habitable zones since they are
relatively cooler.
Other Requirements:
3. Size of the planet
When it comes to finding the right kind of planet to target in the search for life elsewhere
in the universe, the size of the planet matters. (This will dictate the atmosphere and the
magnetic field that a planet would possess.)
4. Atmosphere
A planet devoid of an atmosphere would have an average surface temperature below
freezing and would experience unpredictable and extreme weather and climates. It would also
have an extreme amount of ultraviolet radiation because there is no atmosphere that absorbs
radiation.
The existence of an atmosphere on the planet is mainly due to its gravity which pulls the
atmosphere from being carried away by solar radiation, and volcanism on Earth which
replenishes the amount of gases lost to outer space.
5. Magnetic Field
Earth's magnetic field, also known as the geomagnetic field, is the magnetic field that
extends from the Earth's interior to where it meets the solar wind, a stream of charged particles
emanating from the Sun.
6. Movement of Plate Tectonics
If the Earth didnt have plate tectonics, the upper layers of the mantle would not be able
to cool anywhere near as efficiently. With a warmer upper mantle, the temperature difference
between that region and the Earths deep interior would be smaller, and convection would
eventually cease. And without that convection, the Earths dynamo would die, and its magnetic
field would weaken and disappear.
7. Presence of Moon
Life on Earth may also owe a debt to our nearest celestial neighbor, the moon. Earth's
moon stabilizes our planet's rotation, preventing drastic movements of the poles that could
cause massive changes in climate that some scientists think could have doomed any chance for
budding life to form or evolve. The moon also helpfully pulls the ocean's tides, which scientists
suggest might have been the perfect place for early life to begin evolving to survive on land.