Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
Federal Bureau of Investigation
5525 West Gray Street
Tampa, FL 33609
Phone: (813) 253-1000
1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Ryan Barry in his private individual
capacity and official capacity as Supervising U.S. Deputy Marshal, Fort Myers, FL.
Defendant Barry’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and
official capacity.
2. Defendant Ryan Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that no authentic and genuine
“writ of execution” had ever existed or been “issued”. Barry knew that on the face of a sham
3. Defendant Barry conspired with other Officials and Defendants to falsify official records. In
the record absence of any genuine and valid “writ of execution”, Def. Supervisor Barry
refused to correct the fraudulent acts on the record and prevent further harm. With corrupt
intent to obtain illegal benefits, Def. Barry deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their
4. Because the Plaintiff public corruption victims had previously sued Richard Jessup, U.S.
Deputy Marshal, Defendant R. Barry agreed with other Officials to intimidate and retaliate
against the Plaintiff record landowners. Def. Barry conspired with other Government
Officials and Defendants to intimidate, harass, and coerce the Plaintiffs to refrain from
prosecuting and reporting the record public corruption in the U.S. District and Circuit Court.
5. Under fraudulent pretenses of a facially forged “writ of execution”, Def. Barry conspired
with other Officials to extort Plaintiffs’ property without any justifying “judgment” or any
other explanation and due process. When Plaintiffs notified Def. Barry and proved the fraud
6. Previously under Def. Barry’s reported supervision, Co-Defendant Richard Jessup had
threatened Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorg Busse in Naples, Florida, in the presence
7. Even though the Plaintiffs had filed police reports and complained about Co-Defendant
Richard Jessup’s coercion and threats, Jessup continued to harass and intimidate the
from prosecution or face seizure of their property in the “Cayo Costa” Subdivision.
8. Def. Barry knew that the Plaintiffs had specifically reported the prima facie nullity and
Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that there had never been any legitimate grounds for
any “writ of execution” and that the facially forged “writ” was for criminal and illegal
2
purposes of, e.g., record coercion and extorting fees and property from the Plaintiff public
corruption whistleblowers.
relating to the commission of felonies and unlawful acts directly involving, e.g., Defendant
10. For unlawful purposes of, e.g., coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from reporting crimes and
Samuel intimidated, harassed, and threatened the Plaintiffs with punishment and
11. Defendant Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Defendant U.S. Judges had
deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of express fundamental rights such as, e.g., due
process, equal protection of the law, prosecution by jury trial, equal court access, freedom
from Government oppression and terror, and freedom from unlawful seizures.
12. Defendant Ryan Barry conspired to conceal public corruption, and that in exchange for
bribes, Defendant Judges and Government Officials had deliberately deprived the Plaintiff
corruption victims of their express fundamental rights under the Florida and Federal
Constitutions. Def. Barry knew that on the record, U.S. Defendants had perverted, e.g., the
3
CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT COMMUNICATIONS OF CRIME INFORMATION
13. In direct communications, the Plaintiffs had repeatedly reported Government forgeries of
fictitious “land parcels” and a non-existent “park” to Def. Barry, who recklessly obstructed
Plaintiffs’ crime information about the land-grab-extortion-scheme and fake “parcels” “12-
Defendant Jessup could identify on the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee
14. Def. Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that for criminal and/or unlawful purposes of
extortion of property and coercion, Co-Defendant Barry had perjured himself and/or
materially misrepresented “service” and/or “process”. See Doc. # 429, Case No. 2:2007-cv-
00228. Def. Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Co-Defendant Richard Jessup had
never served Dr. “Jorg Busse at Clerk’s office of U.S. Courthouse” on “2-8-10”.
15. Defendants Ryan Barry and Richard Jessup knew the facially deceptive information on the
“process receipt and return” to be fraudulent, Doc. # 429, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228:
“Subject property is located as shown on maps contained in the website of the Lee
16. Defendant Wilkinson was a named party Defendant without any authority to pervert
Plaintiffs’ record conveyance of riparian Lot 15A, “Cayo Costa”, on the Gulf of Mexico in
reference to said PB 3 PG 25 (1912). See Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, LEE COUNTY INSTR
# 2010000171344. Def. Supervisor Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Defendant
4
Wilkinson was not any professional surveyor or real property attorney, and unauthorized to
determine any parcel boundaries or “site” on the soil. See also PRESCOTT v. STATE OF
FLORIDA, 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Circuit Apr. 21, 2009):
“I. BACKGROUND
A. Current Action
The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee
County, Florida.”
17. Defendants R. Barry and R. Jessup ignored, concealed, and deceived, and conspired to
fraudulently misrepresent the specific “disclaimers” and notices on the referenced website,
“www.leepa.org”. Said website was only for “assessed property value” purposes. Plaintiff
Dr. Jorg Busse is a State Certified Appraiser who had proven the fraud and extortion
18. Defendant Ryan Barry extended the record extortion and fraud schemes by Defendant
19. Defendant Crooked Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs’ riparian property
was unencumbered and free and clear of any “judgment”, because no unpaid “judgment”
could be found on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 and no genuine valid “writ of
5
20. Defendant Barry conspired with other Officials to “post” Plaintiffs’ facially unencumbered
property for illegal and criminal purposes such as, e.g., coercing and retaliating against the
Plaintiffs, and extorting their property. See Doc. # 429, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 …
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13