Date: 30/03/17

The conversation was needed to bring a close understanding and more work order for
the following points:
1) Parameter psAssReSendMax relevant.
2) Baseline parameter follow up
3) U900 project trail follow up:
4) CPICH power setting update:

1- parameter psAssReSendMax:

The roll out for parameter psAssReSendMax from 0 to 2, in different BSCs is giving a
good acceptable improvement on TBF drop rate.
A Mobilis/Netas presentation is composed (not totally completed) for your kind view
and to approve for the remaining BSCs:

parameter Roll out

.pptx

2- ZTE accepted sites Baseline parameter follow up:

After several cell level inconsistency check implementation found and the execution
was requested from NETAS, it became important to highlight again to DID & ZTE
team for values alignments.
Proposition: this task can be done by NPOC with ZTE follow up for their sites.

NB: RNC/BSC inconsistency check is NPOC role only.

3- U900 project trail follow up:

The U900 trail is an important project from two points of view:

It is been requested by the ARPT.

In case of trail succeed, a huge traffic balancing is predicted during the
generalization on the whole NWs.

Meanwhile, the trail is selecting 3 non-congested sites (13107, 13731, and 13652),
and after TRXs removing, it is obvious that KPIs are affected, then tow optimization
actions are taken to compensate:

1. HR activation & TRX(1800) activation to reduce TCH congestion

2. Parameter changing to push CS traffic to 3G.

But the congestion persist.

Your advice is needed in order to plan a meeting with Mr. Moured Kacet/Mr. Ali
Ramdani to clarify our interests toward the KPIs. And also to discuss point 3.

4- CPICH power setting update:

 Date: 30/03/17

This is the last point in the meeting; the CPICH power update to 33dB was requested
by ARPT, plus the implementation is done at the beginning of February month, our
interest was: how far the operation criteria are considered? So, the bellows are
discussed:

Selecting cells criteria has to be defined.

Monitoring the degraded cells is needed.
In case of sharp degradation --> necessity of roll back (1 site so far 37603)
A 10% diagram is requested from Netas to have a nice view on the degraded
sites and to make a quick roll back.

NB: The 10% diagram consist of evaluating the number of degraded cells and to
quantify the KPI affected.