Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Defendants.
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
AND FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION
____________________________________________________________________________/
1. The purported “execution” issued illegally. See § 56.15, Fla. Stat.; Case No. 2:2007-cv-
00228.
2. “No execution or other final process shall issue until the judgment on which it is based has
been recorded nor within the time for serving a motion for new trial or rehearing.…
Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.550. Here, no “judgment in the amount of $5,048.60” was ever “recorded”,
Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Here, no evidence of any such judgment ever existed or could
3. On 07/16/2010, Defendant U.S. District Clerks Drew Heathcoat and Diane Nipper again
falsified and altered official documents and records for criminal and unlawful purposes of
4. In particular, the Clerk obstructed, and conspired with other Defendants to obstruct,
electronic court access, court access, and the filing of Plaintiffs’ pleadings, Case No. 2:2007-
deprived the Plaintiffs of their express fundamental rights to redress Government grievances,
and file their Motions for new trial and rehearing, and Notices of Appeal.
5. Here on the record, the Plaintiffs have been directly attacking the prima facie criminality,
illegality, and nullity of the fraudulently procured “execution”, which issued illegally. See §
6. On 07/16/2010, Defendant Corrupt U.S. District Clerk Drew Heathcoat obstructed to issue
“a written statement that a diligent search of the designated records in Case No. 2:2007-cv-
7. The fake “writ of execution”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, is another publicly recorded
element of organized Government and judicial corruption with corrupt intent to extort fess
stay the illegal execution. Grounds for the motion appeared on the face. Here, e.g., no
judgment had existed. See Docket Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. The purported basis for the
non-existent judgment had never existed, because Def. Forger Wilkinson had never filed any
9. Because, e.g., Def. Forger Wilkinson had criminally and illegally forged “land parcels”
had been highly meritorious, and no “frivolous appeal” could have possibly existed.
10. No “frivolity” was ever determined in the “judgment”, Doc. # 365, Case ## 2:2007-cv-00228;
11. For criminal and unlawful purposes of obstructing justice and court access and perpetrating
fraud on the Courts, Defendants John E. Steele, Sheri Polster Chappell, Charlene E.
Honeywell, Mark A. Pizzo, and Richard A. Lazzara falsified and altered, and conspired to
12. Said judicial Crooks knew and fraudulently concealed that no “regulation”, “resolution”,
“resolution 569/875”, “law”, “legislative act” had ever existed, and that as a matter of
supreme Florida and Federal law, no “law” could have possibly divested the Plaintiffs’ of
08/20/2008 under fraudulent pretenses. Here, the deadline for any hypothetical “Rule 38
motion” had terminated on or around 08/08/2008, and Def. Wilkinson had never filed
anything prior to said deadline to justify any judgment or monetary punishment. Therefore
here, no lawful basis could have possibly existed, and the illegal “execution” has been
14. Here, no lawful writ of execution had ever been issued. Furthermore, the Plaintiffs made an
Affidavit that the “execution” is illegal and stated as grounds, e.g., the lack of any
supporting judgment, the lack of any falsely alleged “Rule 38 motion” by Defendant K. M.
Wilkinson.
15. Plaintiffs again contacted Defendant Crooked Attorney Jack N. Peterson for Def. Forger
Kenneth M. Wilkinson and reported said publicly recorded public corruption, extortion,
16. On 07/19/2010, Plaintiff public corruption victim Jennifer Franklin Prescott updated the
Federal Bureau of Investigation about the public corruption, extortion, fraud, and fraudulent
“writ”.
17. Furthermore, the Plaintiff corruption victims move this Court to “set aside“ the non-existent
judgment and “writ” in accordance with, e.g., Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b), 1.500, and/or 1.540(a).
18. In the prima facie record absence of any recorded judgment, any writ of execution, and any
19. Furthermore here, there were other pending actions affecting the subject matter and
conclusively evidencing the prima facie illegality of the fake “writ”, direct attacks upon its
criminality, as well as fraud, extortion, and corruption. See also Daytona Enterprises, Inc. v.
Wagner, 91 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1956); Childs v. Boats, 112 Fla. 282, 152 So. 214 (1933);
McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 So. 231 (1894); Fair v. Tampa Electric Company, 158
Fla. 15, 27 So.2d 514 (1946); Viggio v. Wood, 101 So.2d 922 (3 D.C.A. 1958).
1. An Order enjoining the publicly recorded illegal “execution”-scheme under Florida law;
2. An Order granting the Plaintiffs summary remedies against the record public corruption
3. An Order staying the illegal and null & void “writ of execution” and any “execution”;
4. An Order enjoining any further public corruption and the record falsification of “land
5. An Order enjoining Defendant Forger K. M. Wilkinson from forging and falsifying official
records and documents for criminal and unlawful purposes of, e.g., extorting unrecorded
fees and property under facially false pretenses of a non-existent “5,048.60 judgment” and
__________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
____________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor
5
2
6
3
4
7