Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • 25 April Chennai Oil Spill Document Leak

    Загружено:

    Vaishnavi Jayakumar
    47 просмотров190 страниц
    2017 Ennore oil spill en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php 2017 Ennore oil spill Location Ennore harbour Coordinates 13.228166º N, 80.363333º E[1] Date 28 January 2017 Cause Cause Collision between LPG tanker and oil tanker Casualties No human life lost as yet Spill characteristics Volume Not disclosed so far Area Not disclosed so far Shoreline impacted North Tamil Nadu The 2017 Ennore oil spill was an oil spill that occurred outside the Kamarajar Port in Ernavoor, Tamil Nadu, India, on 28 January 2017.[2][3] The spill occurred when the outbound empty LPG tanker M.T. BW Maple collided with the inbound fully loaded oil tanker M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram around 04:00 local time. Location The collision between the LPG tanker and the POL (Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants) oil tanker occurred 2 nautical miles off Kamarajar Port in Ennore - a natural harbour about 20 km north of the state capital of Chennai on the Coromandel Coast. The Ennore creek (swampy backwater traversing over 13 km between Pulicat Lake in the north and Kosasthalaiyar river in the south and emptying into the Bay of Bengal) separates the town of Ennore from the Government held public company Kamarajar Port. The satellite port, built to ease load on the Chennai Port along with the fly-ash spewing North Chennai Thermal Power Station and unchecked industrialisation of the area has caused the expected environment fallout to the rich, varied biodiversity[4] of Ennore-Pulicat biosphere prompting a panel consisting of a retired high court judge and two research scholars to recommend in 2016, that industrial expansion be temporarily prohibited in this area.[5] Ecologically sensitive area This portion of the coast is also one of the dwindling global nesting sites of the vulnerable[6] Olive Ridley Turtle which returns annually between January and April to a stretch of North Tamil Nadu beaches to nest.[7] The Pulicat Lake Bird Sanctuary, a proposed RAMSAR site is an ecologically sensitive area with rich aquatic flora and fauna diversity. This brackish water lagoon by virtue of the mixing of fresh water with sea water is found to be an ideal habitat for diverse life-forms supporting 160 species of fish, 25 species of polychaete worms, 12 species of prawn, 19 species of mollusk and 100 species of resident and migratory birds like waterfowl, pelicans, herons, egrets, storks, flamingos, ducks, gulls and terns.[8] Extent and volume of oil spill The quantum of oil spill was not declared be the government of Tamil Nadu upon being questioned by the media. The fisheries minister D. Jayakumar stated that the port authorities would know of it. The area affected by the spill was said by the Indian Coast Guard Commander for the Eastern region, Inspector General Rajan Bargotra, to be 34,000 square metres, in late February.[9] He stated the 95 per cent of the spill was towards north of the Chennai Port with sludge accumulating over a length of 800 metres spread across 11 spots. He added that the shores of the city's Marina Beach suffered minimum impact and that the shoreline of the suburb Tiruvallur had oil accumulation over a 3-km stretch.[10] A report said the volume of the spill could be estimated at 9.9 million US gallons (37,000 m3).[11] Crisis response "Ennore Oil Spill: We’re well prepared on paper but sluggish response made preparedness a joke." This incident has as pointed out by wildlife reporter and investigative journalist Jay Mazoomdar, been marked by still ongoing failures in crisis communication and contingency response.[12] Timeline The Kamarajar Port press release[13] of the day of the collision read : "There is no damage to the environment like oil pollution and no casualty or injury to persons. Both vessels are safely afloat and anchored. Extents of damage to the vessels are under assessment." While initially the port authorities claimed no casualties, injury or damage to the environment, evidence of a rapidly worsening oil spil

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    2017 Ennore oil spill en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php 2017 Ennore oil spill Location Ennore harbour Coordinates 13.228166º N, 80.363333º E[1] Date 28 January 2017 Cause Cause Collision between LPG tanker and oil tanker Casualties No human life lost as yet Spill characteristics Volume Not disclosed so far Area Not disclosed so far Shoreline impacted North Tamil Nadu The 2017 Ennore oil spill was an oil spill that occurred outside the Kamarajar Port in Ernavoor, Tamil Nadu, India, on 28 January 2017.[2][3] The spill occurred when the outbound empty LPG tanker M.T. BW Maple collided with the inbound fully loaded oil tanker M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram around 04:00 local time. Location The collision between the LPG tanker and the POL (Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants) oil tanker occurred 2 nautical miles off Kamarajar Port in Ennore - a natural harbour about 20 km north of the state capital of Chennai on the Coromandel Coast. The Ennore creek (swampy backwater traversing over 13 km between Pulicat Lake in the north and Kosasthalaiyar river in the south and emptying into the Bay of Bengal) separates the town of Ennore from the Government held public company Kamarajar Port. The satellite port, built to ease load on the Chennai Port along with the fly-ash spewing North Chennai Thermal Power Station and unchecked industrialisation of the area has caused the expected environment fallout to the rich, varied biodiversity[4] of Ennore-Pulicat biosphere prompting a panel consisting of a retired high court judge and two research scholars to recommend in 2016, that industrial expansion be temporarily prohibited in this area.[5] Ecologically sensitive area This portion of the coast is also one of the dwindling global nesting sites of the vulnerable[6] Olive Ridley Turtle which returns annually between January and April to a stretch of North Tamil Nadu beaches to nest.[7] The Pulicat Lake Bird Sanctuary, a proposed RAMSAR site is an ecologically sensitive area with rich aquatic flora and fauna diversity. This brackish water lagoon by virtue of the mixing of fresh water with sea water is found to be an ideal habitat for diverse life-forms supporting 160 species of fish, 25 species of polychaete worms, 12 species of prawn, 19 species of mollusk and 100 species of resident and migratory birds like waterfowl, pelicans, herons, egrets, storks, flamingos, ducks, gulls and terns.[8] Extent and volume of oil spill The quantum of oil spill was not declared be the government of Tamil Nadu upon being questioned by the media. The fisheries minister D. Jayakumar stated that the port authorities would know of it. The area affected by the spill was said by the Indian Coast Guard Commander for the Eastern region, Inspector General Rajan Bargotra, to be 34,000 square metres, in late February.[9] He stated the 95 per cent of the spill was towards north of the Chennai Port with sludge accumulating over a length of 800 metres spread across 11 spots. He added that the shores of the city's Marina Beach suffered minimum impact and that the shoreline of the suburb Tiruvallur had oil accumulation over a 3-km stretch.[10] A report said the volume of the spill could be estimated at 9.9 million US gallons (37,000 m3).[11] Crisis response "Ennore Oil Spill: We’re well prepared on paper but sluggish response made preparedness a joke." This incident has as pointed out by wildlife reporter and investigative journalist Jay Mazoomdar, been marked by still ongoing failures in crisis communication and contingency response.[12] Timeline The Kamarajar Port press release[13] of the day of the collision read : "There is no damage to the environment like oil pollution and no casualty or injury to persons. Both vessels are safely afloat and anchored. Extents of damage to the vessels are under assessment." While initially the port authorities claimed no casualties, injury or damage to the environment, evidence of a rapidly worsening oil spil

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    47 просмотров190 страниц

    25 April Chennai Oil Spill Document Leak

    Загружено:

    Vaishnavi Jayakumar
    2017 Ennore oil spill en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php 2017 Ennore oil spill Location Ennore harbour Coordinates 13.228166º N, 80.363333º E[1] Date 28 January 2017 Cause Cause Collision between LPG tanker and oil tanker Casualties No human life lost as yet Spill characteristics Volume Not disclosed so far Area Not disclosed so far Shoreline impacted North Tamil Nadu The 2017 Ennore oil spill was an oil spill that occurred outside the Kamarajar Port in Ernavoor, Tamil Nadu, India, on 28 January 2017.[2][3] The spill occurred when the outbound empty LPG tanker M.T. BW Maple collided with the inbound fully loaded oil tanker M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram around 04:00 local time. Location The collision between the LPG tanker and the POL (Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants) oil tanker occurred 2 nautical miles off Kamarajar Port in Ennore - a natural harbour about 20 km north of the state capital of Chennai on the Coromandel Coast. The Ennore creek (swampy backwater traversing over 13 km between Pulicat Lake in the north and Kosasthalaiyar river in the south and emptying into the Bay of Bengal) separates the town of Ennore from the Government held public company Kamarajar Port. The satellite port, built to ease load on the Chennai Port along with the fly-ash spewing North Chennai Thermal Power Station and unchecked industrialisation of the area has caused the expected environment fallout to the rich, varied biodiversity[4] of Ennore-Pulicat biosphere prompting a panel consisting of a retired high court judge and two research scholars to recommend in 2016, that industrial expansion be temporarily prohibited in this area.[5] Ecologically sensitive area This portion of the coast is also one of the dwindling global nesting sites of the vulnerable[6] Olive Ridley Turtle which returns annually between January and April to a stretch of North Tamil Nadu beaches to nest.[7] The Pulicat Lake Bird Sanctuary, a proposed RAMSAR site is an ecologically sensitive area with rich aquatic flora and fauna diversity. This brackish water lagoon by virtue of the mixing of fresh water with sea water is found to be an ideal habitat for diverse life-forms supporting 160 species of fish, 25 species of polychaete worms, 12 species of prawn, 19 species of mollusk and 100 species of resident and migratory birds like waterfowl, pelicans, herons, egrets, storks, flamingos, ducks, gulls and terns.[8] Extent and volume of oil spill The quantum of oil spill was not declared be the government of Tamil Nadu upon being questioned by the media. The fisheries minister D. Jayakumar stated that the port authorities would know of it. The area affected by the spill was said by the Indian Coast Guard Commander for the Eastern region, Inspector General Rajan Bargotra, to be 34,000 square metres, in late February.[9] He stated the 95 per cent of the spill was towards north of the Chennai Port with sludge accumulating over a length of 800 metres spread across 11 spots. He added that the shores of the city's Marina Beach suffered minimum impact and that the shoreline of the suburb Tiruvallur had oil accumulation over a 3-km stretch.[10] A report said the volume of the spill could be estimated at 9.9 million US gallons (37,000 m3).[11] Crisis response "Ennore Oil Spill: We’re well prepared on paper but sluggish response made preparedness a joke." This incident has as pointed out by wildlife reporter and investigative journalist Jay Mazoomdar, been marked by still ongoing failures in crisis communication and contingency response.[12] Timeline The Kamarajar Port press release[13] of the day of the collision read : "There is no damage to the environment like oil pollution and no casualty or injury to persons. Both vessels are safely afloat and anchored. Extents of damage to the vessels are under assessment." While initially the port authorities claimed no casualties, injury or damage to the environment, evidence of a rapidly worsening oil spil

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 190

    CHENNAI OIL SPILL

    Documents as on 25 April 2017

    LEAK
    BEFORE THE NATION AL GREEN TRIBUNAL
    SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

    Application No.16 of 2017 (SZ)


    Applicant (s) Respondents
    Saravanan Dakshinamurthy Vs. The Union of India
    No.11A, Muthallamman Kovil Street rep.by its Secretary, Ministry of
    Selaiyur, Chennai 73 Environment and Forests,
    Climate Change, Jorbagh,
    New Delhi and others
    Legal Practioners for Applicant (s) Legal Practitioners for Respondents
    Yogeshwaran A, Mr.Syed Nurullah Sheriff for R1
    Neha Miriam Kurian Mr.Su Srinivasan for R2 & R3
    Mr.M.K.Subramanian for R4
    Mr.M.T.Arunan for R5
    Mr.D.S.Ekambaram for R8
    Mr.H.Yasmeen Ali for R9

    Note of the Orders of the Tribunal


    Registry
    Date: 03rd February, 2017
    Item No.1

    We have heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Admit.

    Issue notice to the respondents. Mr.Syed Nurullah Sheriff takes notice

    for 1st respondent. Mr.Su Srinivasan takes notice for respondent

    Nos.2 & 3. Mr.M.K.Subramanian takes notice for 4th respondent.

    Mr.M.T.Arunan takes notice for 5th respondent. Mr.D.S.Ekambaram

    takes notice for 8th respondent. Mrs.Yasmeen Ali takes notice for 9th

    respondent. Private notice is permitted to 6th and 7th respondents.

    Post this application alongwith Application No.14 of 2017 on

    20.02.2017.

    ..........................................., JM
    (Justice Dr. P. Jyothimani)

    ...........................................,EM
    (Shri P.S. Rao)
    BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL

    SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

    Application Nos.14, 16, 38 & 40 of 2017 (SZ)


    Applicant(s) Respondents

    Application No.14 of 2017

    Meenava Thanthai 1. The Chairman


    K.R. Selvaraj Kumar National Coastal Zone Management
    Rep. by its President Authority, MoEF & C, New Delhi
    M.R. Thiyagarajan 2. The State of Tamil Nadu
    Royapuram, Chennai rep. by its Secretary to Govt
    Environment & Forest Dept,Chennai
    3. The State of Tamil Nadu
    Rep. by it Secretary to Govt, PWD,Chennai
    4. The Member Secretary,
    State Coastal Zone Management Authority
    Chennai
    5. The District Collector, Thiruvallur
    6. The Chairman
    Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board
    Chennai
    7. The ADGP, Coastal Security Group
    DGP Office Complex, Mylapore, Chennai
    8. The Tahsildhar, Ponneri
    9. M/s. Kamarajar Port Ltd., rep. by its
    Chairman, Chennai
    10. M.T. Dawn Kancheepuram
    Arya Voyagers Pvt. Ltd.,
    Rep. by its Managig Director, Mumbai
    11. M.T. BW Maple, rep. by its Chairman
    Chennai
    12. The Member Secretary, Central
    Pollution Control Board, New Delhi
    13. The Director General
    Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi.
    14. MoEF, New Delhi (suo motu)

    Counsel appearing for applicant Counsel appearing for respondent/s

    Mr. K. Mageshwaran Mr. G.M. Syed Nurullah Sheriff for R1&14


    M/s. M.K. Subramanian,
    E. Manoharan &
    P. Velmani for R2 to R5, R7 & R8
    Mrs.H. Yasmeen Ali for R6
    Mr. M. T. Arunan for R9
    Mr.S. Vasudevan for R10
    Mr. Raghunathan for R11
    M/s. D.S Ekambarm & P. Jayalakshmi for R12
    Mr.Su. Srinivasan for R13

    Application No.16 of 2017 (SZ)


    Applicant (s) Respondents
    Saravanan Dakshinamurthy Vs. The Union of India
    No.11A, Muthallamman Kovil Stre rep.by its Secretary, Ministry of
    Selaiyur, Chennai 73 Environment and Forests,
    Climate Change, Jorbagh,
    New Delhi
    2. The Union of India, rep. by its
    Secretary, Ministry of Shipping
    New Delhi
    3. The Indian Coast Guard, rep by
    Its Director General, Chennai
    4. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.
    By its Director, Dept of Env &
    Forest, Chennai
    5. Kamarajar Port Ltd. Rep. by its
    Chairman cum M.D, Chennai
    6. M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram
    Arya Voyagers , rep. by its M.D
    Mumbai

    7. M.T. BW Maple, rep. by its


    Chairman, Chennai
    8. The Central Pollution Control Bd
    Rep. by its authorised officer
    9. The Tamil Nadu Pollution
    Control Board, Delhi

    Legal Practioners for Applicant (s) Legal Practitioners for Respondents


    Yogeshwaran A, Mr.Syed Nurullah Sheriff for R1
    Neha Miriam Kurian Mr.Su Srinivasan for R2 & R3
    Mr.M.K.Subramanian for R4
    Mr.M.T.Arunan for R5
    Mr. S. Vasudevan for R6
    Mr. Raghunathan for R7
    Mr.D.S.Ekambaram &
    P. Jayalakshmi for R8
    Mr.H.Yasmeen Ali for R9

    Application No.38 of 2017 (SZ)

    Applicant(s) Respondent(s)

    Ashwini Kumar 1. Union of India


    R/o. E-38, Greenwood City Ministry of Environment and Forests
    Sector 46, Gurgaon 122003 New Delhi, through Secretary
    2. Ministry of Shipping, through its
    Director, New Delhi
    3. State of Tamil Nadu
    Through Chief Secretary, Chennai
    4. Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board
    Thro. Its Member Secretary, Chennai
    5. Kamarajar Port Ltd., Chennai
    6. Tamil Nadu Maritime Board, Chennai
    7. Indian Oil Corporation, New Delhi
    8. Tokio Marine Holdings Inc
    Rep.in India thro
    M/s.IFFCO Tokio General Ins.Co
    Owners of MV Maple Galaxy
    Gurgaon, Hasryana
    9. M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram
    Arya Voyagers , rep. by its M.D
    Mumbai

    Counsel appearing for applicant Counsel appearing for respondent/s

    M/s. VSA Legal Advocates Mrs. Me. Saraswathy for R1


    Mr. Su. Srinivasan for R2
    Mr. M.K. Subramanian for R3
    Mrs. Yasmeen Ali for R4 & R6
    Mr. M. Ravindran, Senior Counsel
    For Krishna Ravindran
    Mr. T. Arunan for R5
    Mr. S.Vasudevan for R9

    Application No.40 of 2017 (SZ)

    Applicant(s) Respondent(s)

    P. Somasundaram 1. Union of India


    Advocate Ministry of Environment and Forests
    Delhi New Delhi, through Secretary
    2. Union of India, rep.by its Secretary
    Ministry of Shipping & Road Transport
    And Highways, New Delhi
    3. Director General of Shipping
    Bombay
    4. Central Pollution Control Board
    Through its Chairman, New Delhi

    Counsel appearing for applicant Counsel appearing for respondent/

    M/s. P.V. Yogeswaan Mrs. Me. Saraswathi for R1


    K. Maylsamty Mr. Su. Srinivasan R2 & R3
    Mr.D.S.Ekambaram &
    Mrs. P. Jayalakshmi for R4

    M.A. No.32 of 2017

    Note of the
    Registry
    Orders of the Tribunal

    Item No.19 Date: 20th February, 2017


    to 22
    Application No.14 of 2017

    Mr.S.Vasudevan, learned Senior Counsel has filed vakalat for


    respondent No.10. He shall be furnished with copies of pleadings
    by the Registry.
    The learned counsel appearing for the State Government -
    respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 & 8 has filed common reply as well as
    documents and undertakes to serve copies to all the counsels.
    For respondent No.9 - Kamarajar Port Limited, Mr.M.
    Ravindran, Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.Krishna
    Ravindran has filed reply after serving copies to the learned counsel
    appearing on the other side.
    Mr.Raghunathan, the learned counsel appearing for 11th
    respondent undertakes to file vakkallat. He shall be permitted to
    receive the copy from the Registry if sufficient number of copies are
    available. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant
    undertakes to serve copies to the learned counsel.
    We direct the Director General of Shipping who acts as the
    nodal agency to file reply along with all documents.
    We also direct the learned Assistant Solicitor General to be
    present on the next date of hearing.
    After hearing the learned counsel appearing on all sides, we are
    of the view that MoEF, Government of India should be made as a
    party. Accordingly, suo motu we implead MoEF, Government of
    India represented by its Secretary, Parayawaran, New Delhi as 14th
    respondent. Mr.Syed Nurullah Sheriff takes notice for the MoEF.
    He shall also file reply on behalf of MoEF.

    Application No.16 of 2017


    Mr.S.Vasudevan, learned Senior Counsel has filed vakalat
    for respondent No.6. He shall be furnished with copies of
    pleadings by the Registry.
    The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.4
    State Government has filed common reply as well as documents
    and undertakes to serve copies to all the counsels.
    Mr.Raghunathan, the learned counsel appearing for 7th
    respondent undertakes to file vakalat. He shall be permitted to
    receive the copy from the Registry if sufficient number of copies are
    available. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant
    undertakes to serve copies to the learned counsel.
    For respondent No.5 - Kamarajar Port Limited, Mr.M.
    Ravindran, Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.Krishna
    Ravindran has filed reply after serving copies to the learned counsel
    appearing on the other side.
    Application No.38 of 2017
    Mrs.M.E.Saraswathy takes notice for 1st respondent. Mr.Su
    Srinivasan takes notice for 2nd respondent. Mr.M.K.Subramanian &
    E.Manoharan takes notice for 3rd respondent. Mrs.Yasmeen Ali
    takes notice for 4th & 6th respondents. Mr. M. Ravindran, Senior
    Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.Krishna Ravindran takes notice
    for 5th respondent. Mr. SVasudevan takes notice for 9th respondent.
    Private notice is issued to 7th & 8th respondents. The Registry is
    directed to take copies of the pleadings and supply the same to all
    the counsel who have undertaken to file vakalat.
    Mr.D.S.Ekambaram, learned counsel appearing for the
    CPCB submits that inspection has been carried out by them along
    with TNPCB and a joint inspection report will be filed on the next
    date of hearing.
    Application No.40 of 2017
    Print the name of Mrs.M.E.Saraswathy learned counsel
    appearing for the 1st respondent. Mr.Su.Srinivasan takes notice for
    2nd and 3rd respondents. Mr.D.S.Ekambaram takes notice for 4th
    respondent

    Post all these matters on 13.03.2017.

    ..........................................., JM
    (Justice Dr. P. Jyothimani)

    ...........................................,EM
    (Shri P.S. Rao)
    BEFORE THE NATION AL GREEN TRIBUNAL
    SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

    Application Nos.14, 16, 38 & 40 of 2017 (SZ)

    Applicant(s) Respondents
    Application No.14 of 2017
    Meenava Thanthai 1. The Chairman
    K.R. Selvaraj Kumar National Coastal Zone Management
    Rep. by its President Authority, MoEF & C, New Delhi
    M.R. Thiyagarajan 2. The State of Tamil Nadu
    Royapuram, Chennai rep. by its Secretary to Govt
    Environment & Forest Dept,Chennai
    3. The State of Tamil Nadu
    Rep. by it Secretary to Govt, PWD,Chennai
    4. The Member Secretary,
    State Coastal Zone Management Authority
    Chennai
    5. The District Collector, Thiruvallur
    6. The Chairman
    Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board
    Chennai
    7. The ADGP, Coastal Security Group
    DGP Office Complex, Mylapore, Chennai
    8. The Tahsildhar, Ponneri
    9. M/s. Kamarajar Port Ltd., rep. by its
    Chairman, Chennai
    10. M.T. Dawn Kancheepuram
    Arya Voyagers Pvt. Ltd.,
    Rep. by its Managig Director, Mumbai
    11. M.T. BW Maple, rep. by its Chairman
    Chennai
    12. The Member Secretary, Central
    Pollution Control Board, New Delhi
    13. The Director General
    Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi.
    14. MoEF, New Delhi (suo motu)

    Counsel appearing for applicant Counsel appearing for respondent/s

    Mr. K. Mageshwaran Mr. G.M. Syed Nurullah Sheriff for R1&14


    M/s. M.K. Subramanian,
    E. Manoharan &
    P. Velmani for R2 to R5, R7 & R8
    Mrs.H. Yasmeen Ali for R6
    M/s.Krishna Ravindran
    A.Charles Darwin & S.Praveen
    Kumar for R9
    Mr.S. Vasudevan for R10
    Mr. Raghunathan, T.Poornam,
    Sharanya Vaidyanathan for R11
    M/s. D.S Ekambarm & P. Jayalakshmi for R12
    Mr.Su. Srinivasan for R13

    Application No.16 of 2017 (SZ)


    Applicant (s) Respondents

    Saravanan Dakshinamurthy Vs. The Union of India


    No.11A, Muthallamman Kovil Stre rep.by its Secretary, Ministry of
    Selaiyur, Chennai 73 Environment and Forests,
    Climate Change, Jorbagh,
    New Delhi
    2. The Union of India, rep. by its
    Secretary, Ministry of Shipping
    New Delhi
    3. The Indian Coast Guard, rep by
    Its Director General, Chennai
    4. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.
    By its Director, Dept of Env &
    Forest, Chennai
    5. Kamarajar Port Ltd. Rep. by its
    Chairman cum M.D, Chennai
    6. M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram
    Arya Voyagers , rep. by its M.D
    Mumbai
    7. M.T. BW Maple, rep. by its
    Chairman, Chennai
    8. The Central Pollution Control Bd
    Rep. by its authorised officer
    9. The Tamil Nadu Pollution
    Control Board, Delhi

    Legal Practioners for Applicant (s) Legal Practitioners for Respondents

    Yogeshwaran A, Mr.Syed Nurullah Sheriff for R1


    Neha Miriam Kurian Mr.Su Srinivasan for R2 & R3
    Mr.M.K.Subramanian for R4
    M/s.Krishna Ravindran
    A.Charles Darwin &
    S.Praveen Kumar for R5
    Mr. S. Vasudevan for R6
    Mr. Raghunathan, T.Poornam,
    & Sharanya Vaidyanathan for R7
    Mr.D.S.Ekambaram &
    P. Jayalakshmi for R8
    Mr.H.Yasmeen Ali for R9

    Application No.38 of 2017 (SZ)

    Applicant(s) Respondent(s)
    Ashwini Kumar 1. Union of India
    R/o. E-38, Greenwood City Ministry of Environment and Forests
    Sector 46, Gurgaon 122003 New Delhi, through Secretary
    2. Ministry of Shipping, through its
    Director, New Delhi
    3. State of Tamil Nadu
    Through Chief Secretary, Chennai
    4. Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board
    Thro. Its Member Secretary, Chennai
    5. Kamarajar Port Ltd., Chennai
    6. Tamil Nadu Maritime Board, Chennai
    7. Indian Oil Corporation, New Delhi
    8. Tokio Marine Holdings Inc
    Rep.in India thro
    M/s.IFFCO Tokio General Ins.Co
    Owners of MV Maple Galaxy
    Gurgaon, Hasryana
    9. M.T. Dawn Kanchipuram
    Arya Voyagers , rep. by its M.D
    Mumbai

    Counsel appearing for applicant Counsel appearing for respondent/s

    M/s. VSA Legal Advocates Mrs. Me. Saraswathy for R1


    Mr. Su. Srinivasan for R2
    Mr. M.K. Subramanian for R3
    Mrs. Yasmeen Ali for R4 & R6
    M/s.Krishna Ravindran
    A.Charles Darwin &
    S.Praveen Kumar for R5
    Mr. S.Vasudevan for R9

    Application No.40 of 2017 (SZ)


    Applicant(s) Respondent(s)
    P. Somasundaram 1. Union of India
    Advocate Ministry of Environment and Forests
    Delhi New Delhi, through Secretary
    2. Union of India, rep.by its Secretary
    Ministry of Shipping & Road Transport
    And Highways, New Delhi
    3. Director General of Shipping
    Bombay
    4. Central Pollution Control Board
    Through its Chairman, New Delhi

    Counsel appearing for applicant Counsel appearing for respondent/


    M/s. P.V. Yogeswaan Mrs. Me. Saraswathi for R1
    K. Maylsamty Mr. Su. Srinivasan R2 & R3
    Mr.D.S.Ekambaram &
    Mrs. P. Jayalakshmi for R4
    M.A. No.32 of 2017

    Note of the Orders of the Tribunal


    Registry
    Date: 13th March, 2017
    Item No. 10
    to 13 In all these applications, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has

    filed common reply after serving copies to the learned counsel appearing

    on the other side. The 13th respondent Director General, Ministry of

    Shipping in Application No.14 of 2017 has filed reply after serving copies

    to the learned counsel appearing on the other side. Likewise, the 3rd

    respondent in Application No.16 of 2017 Indian Coast Guard represented

    by Director General, has also filed reply after serving copy to the learned

    counsel appearing on the other side.

    Mr.Vasudevan, learned counsel appearing for the 10th respondent

    M.T.Dawn Kancheepuram in Application No.14 of 2017 has filed

    appearance and seeks time to file reply in all these cases. Mr.Krishna

    Ravindran, learned counsel appearing for the Kamarajar Port Ltd. has filed

    reply after serving copies to the other side.

    In Application No.38 of 2017, the 8th respondent is referred wrongly

    as M.V. Maple Galaxy. As it is seen in the letter of the Principal

    Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu that the name of the vessel is

    BW Maple with address for correspondence being Mapletree Business

    City,17-02, 10, Pasir Panjang Road, Singapore 117438. Accordingly,

    the name of the 8th respondent in Application No.38 of 2017 is changed as

    BW Maple represented by BW VLGC. Ltd. having address for

    correspondence at BW VLGC Ltd. Mapletree Business City, No.17-02, 10,

    Pasir Panjang Road, Singapore 117438. The Registry shall make

    necessary amendment in this regard. The learned counsel appearing for

    the applicant undertakes to file fresh memo of parties.


    Mr.S.Raghunathan, learned counsel undertakes to appear for the said

    BW Maple and file reply on the next date of hearing.

    We have heard learned counsel for the parties. After hearing the

    learned counsel for all the parties, we direct that the pleadings should be

    completed within 3 weeks from today. Pleadings include, reply, rejoinder

    and documents and the documents and pleadings should be exchanged

    much in advance and shall be filed before the Registry within 3 weeks from

    today. The documents include the reports on the inspection of the shore

    area by the State and Central Pollution Control Boards.

    Post these applications on 26.04.2017 for further orders.

    ..........................................., JM
    (Justice Dr.P.Jyothimani)

    ...........................................,EM
    (Shri P.S. Rao)
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    XXXXXXXXXX

    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx

    xxxxxxxxxxxx

    xxxxxxxxxxxx

    xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxx
    xx

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxx

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxx

    Вам также может понравиться