Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CHEM1411-P5L
April 4, 2017
Procedures:
Actual Materials: Graduated Cylinder, ring stand, gloves, NiCl26H2O, test tube,
1. A 100 mL aqueous solution of .25M CoCl26H2O was created by adding 50.3 grams of
were produced.
5. Once all 4 solutions were scanned, excel was used to plot all the data on one organized
graph.
6. Using the graph and resources provided, an unknown was found and its concentration
was calculated.
Results:
Last Name 2
The graph above represents the absorbance to concentration (mol/l) of .25M CoCl26H2O and
nm)
1 .25 1.83
2 .20 1.19
3 .15 1.09
4 .10 .700
Unknown .14 1.09
Calculations:
To figure out the amount of water and solution needed to dilute for a certain concentration,
For 0.20M concentration, .25M (x) = .20M (.10ml), therefore, x= 8. So, 8 ml of the
CoCl26H2O solution was added with 2ml of water to dilute the solution and make it
a 0.20M concentration.
Last Name 3
For 0.15M concentration, .25M (x) = .15M (.10ml), therefore, x= 6. So, 6 ml of the
CoCl26H2O solution was added with 4ml of water to dilute the solution and make it
a 0.15M concentration.
For 0.10M concentration, .25M (x) = .10M (.10ml), therefore, x= 4. So, 4 ml of the
CoCl26H2O solution was added with 6ml of water to dilute the solution and make it
a 0.10M concentration.
Beers Law: A=ELC, A=1.09 (unknown solution absorbance), E=6.98 (obtained from the
Discussion:
The experimental process went without any known errors. Although this lab ran very smooth and
efficient, a possible error was the fact that there may have been a couple extra drops of
CoCl26H2O added that could have increased the concentration, therefore affecting the
absorbance readings. Despite the previous statement, the measurements were taken precisely
using the graduated cylinders, to ensure that there were no false amounts being put into the
solution. Even after being extremely careful though out with each dilution, the unknown
substance with the same absorption as .15M of CoCl26H2O calculated out to be .14M
concentration, which might have been caused due to some type of human error while measuring
the amount of solution. This could have happened because a couple more drops of CoCl26H2O
were added for the unknown substance, causing the concentration for it to be .1M less than the
0.15M concentration. Other than that, there were no other indications of any other possible
errors.
One possible source of error is that the cuvette, although wiped off before being placed in the
colorimeter each time may not have been perfectly clean. Anything left on the cuvette would
decrease the light that could pass and would result in a higher measured absorbance. If this
happened on the first few solutions of known concentration it would have decreased the slope of
the graph, resulting in a larger calculated concentration for the unknown. If this problem had
occurred on either of the two more concentrated solutions, it would have increased the slope of
the line, causing a decrease in the calculated value for the unknown concentration. If this had
occurred with the unknown itself, the higher measured absorbance would have led a calculated
concentration that was too high. Another problem that may have been encountered was that each
when each solution was placed in the cuvette, traces of the prior solution may have still been
present. For each of the solutions of known concentration, this would have decreased their
concentration and therefore their absorbance, lowering the line on the graph. This would have led
to a lower intercept value and a higher calculated concentration for the unknown. The unknown
was placed in the cuvette after the most concentrated solution was measured and might therefore
have been more concentrated, resulting in a higher absorbance and a higher calculated
concentration
Conclusions:
In this lab experiment, the absorption spectrum of CoCl26H2O was measured between the
wavelengths of 400 and 900 nm. Based on this spectrum, max was determined, and a set of
serial dilutions were analyzed to obtain a Beers Law plot. The concentration of CoCl26H2O in
an unknown was then determined by using Beers Law equation. Therefore, it can be concluded
Reflection:
Last Name 5
I learned from this experiment that Spectrophotometry is used extensively in chemical analysis
and all types of this technology rely on the BeerLambert law. I realized that it is used in the
chlorine analyzers used in swimming pool and aquarium care. It is the basis of many if not
most clinical lab determinations. When we judge the concentration of our drinks using the
References:
Lab Manual: Spectrophotometry and the Beer-Lambert Law An Important Analytical Technique
in Chemistry Jon H. Hardesty, Ph.D. Collin County Community College Dept. of Chemistry