Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Curtain , Helena and Carol Ann Dahlberg , New York, Pearson Allyn & Bacon, 2010.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 1
Bernard Mohan (1986) has outlined three types of relationships between language
teaching and content teaching. They are as follows:
1. Language teaching by content teaching, in which the focus is on content, and the language
competencies develop almost incidentally. The intention is that the student will learn the
second language by participating in the content instruction. The belief is that students will
learn language through exposure to modified content alone.
2. Language teaching with content teaching, where the focus is on teaching both language and
content. In such an approach the language and content objectives are in close alignment.
Language learning in the language classroom can further the goals of content teaching by
giving learners help with the processes of content learning.
3. Language teaching for content teaching, in which students learn the specific language needed
for success in various subject areas as quickly as possible.
Immersion and two-way immersion/bilingual programs focus on the first area of
language and content teachinglanguage teaching by content teaching. Content-based early
language programs, partial immersion programs, and sheltered English programs focus on the
second arealanguage teaching with content teaching. English Language Learner programs, in
some cases, focus on the third arealanguage teaching for content teaching.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 2
providing subject content instruction, the teacher surrounds the students with language to which
they can relate by means of a concrete experience, or on the basis of their previous experiences
with the information.
Lessons on mapping and graphing, estimating, measuring, endangered animals, the solar
system, or the rain forest provide rich opportunities for making language input comprehensible
through meaningful visual and tactile experiences. The language used is comprehensible to the
students because teachers make sure that ideas and concepts are being communicated clearly and
concretely in language the students understand. The language is supported by contextual clues,
often in the form of visuals or concrete objects.
Content-related instruction supports what we know about how the brain makes
connections and how learning takes place. Students are actively engaged in constructing meaning
and making sense of the interesting world presented to them through the vehicle of English.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 3
the inquiry method; the use of photos, pictures and study prints; the use of historical artifacts;
and reference to colorful periodicals all provide rich stimuli for meaning-based language
instruction.
Although the social studies, especially geography, offer a wealth of language and
materials for content-related instruction, there are both advantages and disadvantages to using
social studies as a basis for early language learning programs. On the one hand, there is the
potential for a great deal of meaningful language and vocabulary use in topic areas that are
closely related to the language and cultures curriculum. On the other hand, there may be more
vocabulary and language proficiency required for the content and processes of social studies than
novice level language students can adequately develop. This problem becomes evident beginning
as early as grade three in a K-5 curriculum. Many important geography concepts, however, such
as identification of places, use of maps, and map directions, work well with novice learners even
though they may be cognitively complex.
Mathematics
Conceptual mathematics explanations and abstract concepts at higher levels of
mathematics instruction may pose difficulties, but computation and concrete problem-solving
situations can be very useful in content-related instruction. Concepts of size and shape are easily
communicated in English, and primary school language teachers have long used simple
computation as a means of practicing number concepts. We have included here some of the
components of the primary school mathematics curriculum in order to illustrate in just one
subject area a sampling of a few possible curriculum connections that could be made in the
language program.
Measurement
Learn to measurein inches/feet/centimeters/meters
Identify standard measures and intra-system equivalencies
Statistics
Read, interpret, and construct graphs
given a set of data, determine the mean or average of that data
Tell, read, and write time to the nearest minute
Arithmetic
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 4
Make simple calculations, using English to review and reinforce math facts and
measurement
Read, write, and say whole numbers 0-100 billion
Find products and quotients of whole numbers
Multiply mentally by 10, 100 or 1,000
Graphing Activities
Graphing is an excellent mathematics-related activity that can be used with many different
themes in a language classroom, even when children have relatively limited expressive language
ability. Graphing is also an essential concept in science and social studies.
A first experience with graphing might be entirely teacher directed and involve only
physical responses on the part of the children. (Children have already learned to understand
colors and various items of clothing when the teacher describes them.)
Teacher: Everyone who has brown shoes on, stand up.
Hold up your left foot so we can see your brown shoe.
(Walks around class to check for shoes and to comment)
Yes, Mary has brown shoes--they look new, Mary!
Look, Tom has brown shoes.
Let's see how many people have brown shoes (counts)
1-2-3-4-...(or children may count along)
(Goes to prepared chart on overhead projector, chart paper or chalkboard)
Seven children have brown shoes.
(Colors in graph--seven squares, perhaps with brown marker or places colored
shoes on the graph)
Everyone who has brown shoes, sit down.
Everyone with black shoes, raise your hand.
Wave your hand back and forth!
Lift up your feet so we can see your black shoes.
(Continues in this way, changing things slightly with each color)
At the end of this activity there will be a completed graph that the children can talk about.
If the activity is used with more than one class during the day, the graphs for the different classes
can be compared, and such concepts as more and less can be practiced.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 5
With very young children, a graph is more meaningful if it is created with real objects. In
the shoe graph activity, a first step with kindergarten children might be to have each child place
her or his own shoe in the appropriate space on a graph outlined on the floor. As a next step, the
child might trade the shoe for a piece of paper in the color of their shoe, thus making the
connection between the number of papers and the number of shoes.
Measuring and graphing heights of class members using feet and inches has a cultural
shock value for students of all ages. The heights of the class can then be graphed, following a
procedure similar to that of the shoe graph.
Another type of graphing activity involves food (or other item) preferences. Pictures of
different foods might be placed on each of the walls of the room, and children "vote" for their
favorite first by pointing to it and then by walking to that section of the room. (In a class in
which children are already doing a lot of speaking, they might express their preferences orally.)
The teacher counts the number of students at each of the options and colors in the results on the
graph. As an alternative, the students themselves might place a square representing their choice
on the chart, perhaps with their name printed on it, to help build a graph. Once the graphing
activity has been completed, it can be the basis of discussion and used for comparisons, for
recalling favorite foods of individual classmates, for games, and for a variety of other
communicative activities.
At more advanced speaking stages, children might take surveys among their classmates
about topics that interest them and graph the results, using their graphs to help explain their
discoveries to their classmates. Some sample topics would be: Number of sisters and brothers,
number or kind of pet(s), favorites (colors, day of the week, season of the year, vegetable, and so
on).
Science
Science is especially well suited to content-related foreign language instruction. Hands-on
science activities involve many opportunities for interaction and meaningful exchange of
language. Activities such as formulating hypotheses and reformulating them when the outcomes
vary are important opportunities for the exchange of real information with learners beyond the
novice level. Science instruction incorporates the use of many graphics and charts that
contribute to understanding.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 6
One of the most powerful strategies in science instruction is the use of prediction. Students
encounter a puzzling situation or develop an experiment and predict the results they expect, thus
investing personally in both the project and the solution. This strategy can be implemented even
when students still have very limited expressive language skills, if the teacher surrounds the
experience with language and uses carefully designed questioning techniques. The following
example from a lesson on the properties of water illustrates how the student involvement might
be guided:
T: Who believes that the pear will float? Raise your hand. Who believes that the pear
will not float? Raise your hand. Let's seecounting16 believe that the pear will
float, and 12 believe that the pear will not float. Teacher or student records responses
on the chalkboard or on a graph. I wonder who is right. Does anyone want to change
your mind? Raise your hand if you want to change your mind.
* * * * * *
T: X, do you believe that the pear will float? Yes or no.
X: Yes.
T: X says yes. Let's mark yes for X. Asks one child after another, and records the
response on a graph, or has a student recording responses.
* * * * * *
T: Y, do you believe that the pear will sink or float?
C: Sink.
T: Y believes that the pear will sink. Let's put one mark by "sink." Asks one child after
another, and records the response on a graph
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 7
PLANNING FOR CONTENT-RELATED INSTRUCTION
There are numerous factors to consider when planning connections with the content
curriculum for an integrated thematic curriculum, unit, or lesson. Most of the same
considerations apply for the teacher in an immersion, partial immersion, or content-based
program.
The content-area skills and concepts that can interrelate most effectively with the
language goals
The language competencies needed to work with the content selected
The cognitive skills necessary to perform the tasks in the lesson
The potential for integration with language goals and cultural concepts and goals
It is important to emphasize the point that when teachers incorporate general curriculum
content into a thematic unit, they should not ignore the balance among language, content, and
culture goals. While there may be some lessons in a unit that emphasize subject content,
elements of culture and communication should always be present.
Both authors have had the experience of working with school districts where content-
related instruction is the primary emphasis in a primary school language program, at the expense
of other goals. In these situations, other dimensions of the curriculum appear to suffer. Students
are still learning, of course, but the full potential of an early language program is not being
realized. When this happens, it is often because school administrators seized on the idea of
reinforcing the regular curriculum to the exclusion of the other important elements of language
teaching. In our enthusiasm for content-related instruction, we must remember that our vision is
shaped by the interrelatedness of language, content, and culture.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 8
that novice level learners are able to understand and use? Or do they require more abstract,
complex and sophisticated language?
For the fourth-grade science curriculum of a partial immersion program in Minneapolis, for
example the staff chose a unit on rocks and charts as a likely candidate for Spanish instruction.
They chose this topic because so many of the activities involved handling and observing
characteristics of rocks and then classifying the rocks according to visual criteria.
They decided, however, that a unit on magnetism would require an inappropriately
sophisticated command of English because of the expectation that conclusions would be
evaluated and discussed in great detail.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 9
Hello Mrs. Jaguar, I m Ms. ______Hummingbird. I live in the middle layer. Im pleased to meet
you.
Adapting Materials
Echevarria and Graves (2007) have developed a useful list of techniques for adapting
materials. While some of these are primarily directed at the content-based or immersion setting,
many of the ideas can be used by other programs for young learners, as well.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 10
Consideration #6: Challenges In Integrating Language And Content
A great challenge inherent in the integration of language and content instruction, especially
for bilingual and other content-based programs, is that not enough attention will be paid to the
other crucial elements involved in programs for young learners--language and culture.
Incorporating content alone does not insure that effective language learning will take place.
Content-related instruction incorporates concepts and activities from the general curriculum to
enhance the language class, because they provide meaningful, motivating and intrinsically
interesting experiences upon which to build language learning. English teachers who are
attempting content-based or content-related instruction for the first time often lack a strong
professional preparation in specific content areas. As a result they need to focus most of their
attention on the content aspects of planning and, given the limited planning time available, they
may not plan as carefully for the language and culture components.
Another danger, is the possibility that some of the problematic practices from first-
language teaching will be carried over into second language instruction. A traditional content
class might consist of a series of teacher questions about what students have read, or to elicit
student's background knowledge. The teacher often asks rapid-fire questions that require a
specific answer, often only a one-word or very short answer. The follow-up to the teacher
questions during class might be a worksheet with more questions that students answer
individually. In this example, there is a lot of teacher talk and little opportunity for students to
process what has been learned or to engage in extended discourse. If these practices are used in
the world language class, it is likely that there will be no opportunity for students to use their
new language in a meaningful way. When they do use the second language, under these
circumstances, their teacher may focus only on errors of content and never addressor even
noticeerrors in syntax, grammar or pronunciation.
Solutions to these challenges could include: designing a systematic plan for language
development; providing purposeful, theme-based activities that give the student opportunities to
present a product to an "important audience;" and providing opportunities for students to engage
frequently in extended discourse thorough cooperative learning and interactive tasks. Ideas and
activities presented in this book can be directly useful in addressing many of these challenges.
The solutions lie in a meaning-based, thematic curriculum that purposefully and continually
integrates the teaching of language, content and culture.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 11
SUMMARY
Content-related instruction, properly implemented, gives us a valuable source of cognitively
engaging and intrinsically interesting activities with which we can enrich our programs. It
connects the English curriculum with other parts of students academic lives, and it extends their
access to meaningful information through English.
Including content from the general curriculum and paying attention to general academic skills, while
also teaching students to communicate in another language and culture, can increase the intensity of
the language learning experience, thus enhancing motivation, accelerating language development, and
contributing to the overall academic achievement of the learner.
Especially in primary school programs, the incorporation of content-related instruction can give
increased impetus to language study at that level, not only because of the more effective language
learning it will bring, but also because it offers a solution to the perennial problem of how to find time
for elementary school English instruction.
When subject content is integrated with elementary school English curriculum, the classroom teacher
who struggles to schedule a multitude of curricular areas into a limited amount of time may see the
elementary school English teacher as an ally in this effort, rather than as a competitor in a zero-sum
game for control of instructional time in the school day. Integrating subject content with English
language and culture instruction can be a powerful way to build a stable place in the curriculum for
foreign language programs.
References
Echevarria, Jana, and Anne Graves. 2007. Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English Language Learners with
Diverse Abilities 3rd Ed. . Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
Krashen, Stephen D., and Tracy Terrell. The Natural Approach. Language Acquisition in the Classroom (rev. ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 12
Appendix
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 13
TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE TPR -- BASIC CONCEPTS
James J. Asher (TPR Inventor)
1. Understanding the spoken language precedes speaking.
2. Understanding is developed through students' body movements.
3. Speech should not be forced since students naturally reach a readiness phase where
speech becomes spontaneous.
From: Asher, James J. (2003). Learning Another Language through Actions (6th edition).Sky Oaks
Productions, Inc., P.O.Box 1102, Los Gatos, CA 95031.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 14
Working Techniques
1. Recombine vocabulary in new situations -- novelties.
2. Introduce new items carefully -- don't overwhelm with to much.
3. Involve lexical items already known in more complicated performances.
4. Include small particles and function words that hold the language together.
5. Keep retrieving the original material introduced.
6. Make use of equivalents and synonyms from the beginning -- carefully.
7. Give several commands in sequence to be performed in continuous motion.
8. Keep the vocabulary load down . . . grind a bit at a time.
From: Garcia, Ramiro. (2001). Instructors Notebook: How to apply TPR for best results(4th edition). Sky Oaks
Productions, Inc., P.O.Box 1102, Los Gatos, CA 95031.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 15
Stories with Gestures
Source: Curtain, Helena and Carol Ann Dahlberg. (2010) Languages and Children Making the Match,
4th Ed. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Total Physical Response Storytelling (TPRS) is an approach to combining language with actions
and story. It was introduced by California teacher Blaine Ray in 1990, as a way to motivate his
high school Spanish students and help them succeed. Based on TPR and the Natural Approach,
TPRS embeds new vocabulary and structures as functional chunks in a story line and provides
extensive listening practice before students are expected to speak. Since its introduction TPRS
has undergone many variations, as teachers have adapted it to their own philosophies and
practice. Most recently, it has morphed into new terminology and a somewhat different
approach: Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Storytelling.
Among the many variations, the authors find the approach of Janet Glass to be especially
appealing. For clarity, we will call this variation Stories with Gestures. Glass notes that her
stories are always embedded in a thematic unit with a cultural focus, and she never finds it
necessary to use translation. One of her favorites is from her unit The Llamas Secret, based
on the book El secreto de la llama by Argentina Palacios, a Peruvian flood story (now out of
print). In this story, a llama, our hero, can suddenly speak. It warns the people and animals that
there will be a big flood. He saves them by leading them to the highest peak in the Andes
Mountains. After five days, the flood waters subside, and the llama never speaks again Like
Janet Glass, teachers can devise their own stories and illustrations based on the following model
and examples from the Internet.
Storytelling Step 1
Step 1 in the process is to identify the key vocabulary in the story, draw or find pictures, and
assign a motion for each item. For a folktale or fairy tale, it is best to break the story into short
segments and present them one at a time. Each of the segments should function as a mini-story,
with a clear beginning, middle, and end, in order to sustain interest. Then teach a few items from
the first segment using variations of TPR. For example, the key vocabulary for the first segment
of Janets story might be as follows:
At first, students just listen as a new word is presented. Then they practice the motions with
the teacher. Next, they respond as the teacher combines the vocabulary words in a variety of
ways, creating a variety of sentences or questions, such as, The water rises and rises. When it
rains, does water go up or down? Birds go up and down. In this classroom, do you go up or
down? What else goes up and down? The boy is afraid. Are the fish afraid? Is the boys father
afraid? Are you afraid? Who else is afraid? And so on. One of the means of checking
understanding is to have students do the motions with their eyes closed.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 16
Storytelling Step 2
In step 2, students work in pairs to say or read the vocabulary words to each other and see
whether or not they can do the actions. Then the process can be reversed, and the students do the
actions for each other to prompt the words.
Steps 1 and 2 can be repeated until all the key vocabulary has been introduced with actions
and with many opportunities to practice various combinations of words.
Storytelling Step 3
Step 3 is to use the vocabulary in a story. The teacher can use pictures, puppets, or student
actors to tell a mini-story using the key vocabulary words. A mini-story for this set of vocabulary
follows:
The teacher retells the story several times while students do the gestures, embellishing it in
different ways each time, but the basic story stays the same. Each telling should provide an
opportunity for students to participate and for the teacher to check for understanding: The
students provide gestures; the teacher leaves pauses for students to fill in words; the teacher
makes mistakes and the students correct them; the teacher uses yesno and eitheror questions as
the story progresses (e.g., Is the boy running or swimming?).
Storytelling Step 4
Step 4, after many retellings by the teacher, is for students to practice retelling the story to
each other in partner practice. At this point, the teacher may want to elicit student volunteers to
tell the story, or a variation of it, to the class. Other students may act out the story in front of the
class as their peers narrate it. In some classes, the teacher may wish to have students write out the
story, perhaps first as a copying exercise.
Storytelling Step 5
The mini-story is revised in Step 5. The teacher may want to cover up the last frame of the
story and ask the students to come up with their own new ending, or have students retell the
story, adding new characters and/or new vocabulary. Other possibilities are for the teacher to
present a revised story as a model, or for teacher and students together to experiment with
revisions. The waters can rise and the boy sees a boat instead of a mountain peak, or hes not
afraid and he swims instead. Anything is possible. The teacher might also help students to revise
the story so that it is told in the first person: I am walking. I see the water rising. And so on.
Students then work in pairs to create their own revisions, which are then presented to the class or
written and illustrated for a portfolio or a class book.
For the story of El secreto de la llama, additional segments would be taught as separate
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 17
stories, creating a kind of soap opera effect. As a culminating activity, the entire legend could be
presented and dramatized, an example of presentational communication.
Total Physical Response Storytelling clearly moves students from the interpersonal mode of
communication into a limited experience with presentational communication, both oral and
written. Students build both vocabulary and structure resources that are readily available for
future use. Janet Glass is enthusiastic about this approach: One thing I know from experience
the students remember it long term. I think it's the simultaneous combination of seeing the
pictures, hearing the words, doing the gestures, having the repetition, and enjoying the story.
They really like making one up with slight variations and sharing them. This gives them a lot of
chances to hear and speak the language.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 18
Natural Approach
Adapted from: Curtain, Helena and Carol Ann Dahlberg. (2010) Languages and Children: Making the Match,
3r4thEdition. New York: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
The Natural Approach (Krashen and Terrell, 1983, 1996) is an effort to apply the insights of
second-language acquisition, and especially Krashens five hypotheses, in the beginning
language classroom. Curriculum and activities are designed to be compatible with the stages of
language acquisition as outlined here:
Oral Language Development in the Natural Approach (Krashen and Terrell, 1996)
In this approach, the teacher seeks to help students bind new language by providing
experiences and associations with vocabulary in a meaningful context, thus making the language
both more meaningful and more memorable. Extended listening experiences are provided during
stage 1 of language acquisition, drawing on TPR, use of vivid pictures to illustrate concepts, and
active involvement of the students through physical contact with the pictures and objects being
discussed.
In stage 2, students are drawn into oral participation by means of yesno questions, choice
making, and open-ended statements. The Natural Approach outlines a useful sequencing of teacher
questions to help move students from a listening mode to a speaking mode.
Many teachers plan their questioning of students according to the Natural Approach sequence at
the beginning of Stage 2. , from easiest to more difficult: If students are unable to respond to
questions at one level, the teacher can move back to an easier level, still giving students a chance
to succeed. There are a number of teachers who have posted this sequence, in the target
language, at the back of their classroom, as a reminder of the levels of difficulty of the questions
they are using with their students.
Through the use of context and personalization, the listening and speaking practice of Natural
Approach stage one and stage two are made meaningful rather than mechanical. Only at stage
three does communication really begin to take place, after language and meanings have been
acquired and nurtured over some time.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 19
Sample Natural Approach Levels of Questions to Teach/Review Vocabulary
Level of Hand out objects or pictures (for example, pencil, paper, ruler) to several
students, (for example: Pat, Tony and Tom). (For beginners giving each of three
Question students one object is a good number to start with.) Give Tony the book,
Pat the ruler and Tom the pencil.
Step 1. a) Tell Students
a) Physical Point to the paper. Point to the pencil Point to the ruler.
Response Student must point to the object or picture you are naming.
Do this several times and change the order.
b) Giving name of (You can skip this stage and start directly with Part B
student who has B) Ask students:
object or picture Who has the ruler? Who has the pencil? Who has the book?
They must answer with the name of the student who has the object.
Do this several times and change the order.
Step 2. Next ask the students to answer with yes or no. It is your choice if you want
Students must them to use a complete sentence.
answer
YES or NO Does Tony have the paper? Does Tom have the pencil?
Does Pat have the pencil? Does Tony have the book?
Does Tom have the paper? Does Pat have the ______?
Do this several times and change the order.
Step 3. Next ask for the name of the vocabulary item with an either or question. This is
Students must say the first time that they actually say the vocabulary word, even though they have
the target had many encounters with pointing to it and telling who has it or doesnt have it.
lanaguage
vocabulary word Does Tony have the book or the pencil? Does Pat have the pencil or the ruler.
by answering an Does Tom have the pencil or the book? Does Tony have the ruler or the book?
EITHER-OR Does Pat have the ruler or the book? Does Tom have the ruler or the pencil?
question. Keep asking these questions and keep changing the order.
Students can answer just with the vocabulary word, or they can answer in a
sentence depending on the difficulty of the vocabulary and the level of the
students.
Step 4. Now you ask:
WH Question What does Tony have? What does Tom have? What does Pat have?
What? Who? The students should respond with the name of the vocabulary item. A single
When? where? word response or a complete sentence is up to you.
Step 5. Depending on what type of beginners they are, they may be able to say a bit
Tell me about more.
(Extended Tell me about the ruler. The ruler is red. The ruler is long.
Discourse at a Tell me about the book. The book is red and white. The book is big.
very simple level) Tell me about the pencil. The pencil is blue. The pencil is short.
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 20
Sample Questions (Restaurant Scene) Using Levels 1-4
Content Related Instruction, UMBC TEYL, 2010, Helena Curtain, helenacurtain@earthlink.net Page 21