Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
A mistake is the most valuable thing in a classroom. The teacher, nor the pencil, not even
the answer is as important as a mistake. From a mistake the brain learns, even if there is no
recognition of a mistake. This has vast implication for the math classroom. For this competency,
its implications include support for a student-centered classroom and provide specific insights to
differentiating instruction.
The first artifact is a lesson plan for graphing systems of equations and systems of
inequalities. The student followed along as the teacher filled out the notes, which included
important vocabulary and several examples. This lesson plan demonstrates how the teacher led
the students through important vocabulary and key concepts by asking questions that helped
students connect new content to prior knowledge. It also demonstrates how the teacher asked the
students their opinion on how to solve the problem, providing some appropriate stretching of the
mind by determining how they would solve this problem. It also included evidence of student
choice as the students picked the problems they were to complete for homework.
The second artifact is a collection of pictures from the guided practice activity the
students completed after their notes. For this activity, groups of students were given a system of
equations or inequalities to graph on a large piece of graph paper. The students worked in
cooperative learning groups arranged by high/low learners. They worked together to correctly
graph both equations (inequalities) and represent the solution to the system.
There is such a high anxiety level surrounding mathematics that students need a
connections, logic, and creativity. Math is not, all about rules and procedures certainty and
right and wrong answer, andnumbers (Boaler, 2016, p. 31). This creates a fixed mindset in
learners, enabling them to believe math is strictly a performance subject. For a math classroom to
classroom, this could include measuring angles and side of quadrilaterals to determine
relationships between opposite side or angles. However, students cannot be left on their own to
discover or make up any property they choose. Instead, the teacher leads the discovery,
scaffolding learning for the low students by asking probing questions of their results.
While the teacher offers probing, clarifying questions to the low levels, there must be a
level of disequilibrium for the student to truly learn. Boaler states current math education gives
students repetitive and simple ideas that do not help them [move] to the important state of
disequilibrium (Boaler, 2016, p. 18). Students brains are not being stretched enough. This
creates two problems: it limits meaningful math experiences for high achieving students and
assumes the low achieving student is not capable of such thought, hindering them reaching their
full potential.
The final question is what should this look in a math classroom. After leading the
students through the discovery of a mathematical principle, the students should work together to
complete problems. Here students listen to each other as different students offer ideas (Boaler,
2016). They will make valuable mistakes, fix them, and eventually solve the problem. There is
clear evidence that such learning includes some brain-based strategies, such as searching for
meaning by looking for connections and pattern (Radford, 2013, p. 157). Also, these groups
can be set up based on high/low learners or student choice (Radford, 2013, pp. 159, 166). This
STUDENTCENTERED INSTRUCTION 4
provides the student with opportunity to discuss and teach other students, directly applying what
they learned.
The largest obstacle in a math classroom is the students preconceived notions of their
mathematical ability. This is analogous to our relationship with God. I will always fear the harsh
judgment from God if I always perceived my position before God as sinner instead of saved. To
overcome this, Jesus works in our hearts to change us from the inside out through the power of
the Holy Spirit. Similarly, to overcome a students preconceived notions of their mathematical
ability, the teacher makes the classroom student-centered by promoting mistakes and valuing
them above getting the correct answer. The teacher targets the thoughts of students, the inside,
rather than their correct answer (the outside). In doing so, the teacher creates an environment that
support exploration and student initiative to make connections and find patterns. This is what we
naturally do when we have a right understanding of our position with God, explore his nature
and creation, making connections with his character. This is why the first step is to change how
References
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical Mindsets. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Radford, C. P. (2013). Strategies for Successful Student Teaching. New York: Pearson.