Cinética de la nucleación de percipitados en BG

© All Rights Reserved

Просмотров: 18

Cinética de la nucleación de percipitados en BG

© All Rights Reserved

- Damage Analysis of Welded Joints
- Materials Science Engineering
- Past Manual
- calcium sulfate dihydrate in the presence of magnesium and aluminum.pdf
- 60. Ceramic Brackets Something Old, Something New, A Review. Sem in Orthod, 3 178-189, 1997. S. Bishara, D.E. Fehr
- Unit 2.4 Graphs of Logarithmic Functions_keyf2011
- capgemini
- chem lab 1 doc
- Concrete Technology
- Logarithm
- Recovered_PDF_17199.pdf
- Linear, Log and VdB Vibration Velocity Units
- RenLong_SCSETS_2009_Has Measured Misorientation Between DRX Grains and Their Neighboring Deformed Grains
- Introduction and Classification of Defects According to Dimensionality
- Chapter 2 Crystal Structure
- facansy
- 19-math30-1-exemplars_20170830
- Experimental Validation of Condensing Fl
- Fractal Interpolation
- Sta Assainment

Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 11

JOHN W. CAHNt

Rate laws are derived for transformations in which the new phase nucleates on grain boundary surface,

grain edges, or grain corners, and in which the new phase grows with constant radial velocity. Time-

dependent and time-independent nucleation rates are treated. At high nucleation rates (relative to

growth rates and grain sizes) the rate law assumes a form independent of the nucleation rate, and the

half-time of the transformation becomes approximately 0.1 D/G, where D is the grain diameter and (2 the

radial growth velocity, independently of which sites are responsible for nucleation. St low nucleation

rates the rate law approaches that given by randomly distributed nucleation sites. The conditions which

determine which type of site will produce the most nuclei, and hence determine the form of the rate law,

are discussed.

INTERGRANULAIRES

Des lois de vitesse de germination sont Btablies pour des transformations au tours desquelles la

nouvelle phase apparait aux surfaces intergranulaires aux bords et aux coins de grains, et

croit iL vitesse radiale constante. On Btudiee Bgalement les vitesse de germination influencPes ou non par

le facteur temps. Pour des vitesses de germination &e&es (comparativement aux vit,esses de crossiance

et aux dimensions des grains) la loi est indbpendanto de Is vitesse de germination et la demi-durbe de

transformation est approximativement 0,l D/G, avec D = diametre du grain et, G = vitesse radiale de

croissance, quelque soient les endroits ob seffectue la germination.

Pour des vitesses de germination faibles, la loi se rapproche de celle valable lorsque la germination

seffectue k partir de sites distribuks au hasard. Laubeur discute encore les conditions determinant

les types de sites de nucleation dormant lieu au plus grand nomhre de germes, et par suit,e la forme de la

loi de la vitesse de croissance.

Fiir Umwandlungen, bei denen die neue Phase an Korngrenzflhchen, Kanten oder E&en van

KGrnern entsteht und bei denen die neue Phase mit konstanter Radialgeschwindigkeit w&chst, werden

Gesetzmiissigkeiten fiir die Umwandlungsgeschwindigkeit abgeleit,et. Dabei werden zeitabh&ngige und

zeitunabhiingige Keimbildungsgeschwindigkeiten behandelt. Bei hohen Keimbildungsgeschwindig-

keiten (im Vergleich zur Wachstumsgeschwindigkeit und dor KorngrGsse) nimmt die Gesetzmiissigkeit,

der Umwandlungsgeschwindigkeit eine van der Keimbildungsgeschwindigkeit unabhgngige Form an

und die Halbwertszeit der Umwandlung wird-unabhkngig davon, an welchen St&en die Keimbildung

erfolgt-niiherungsweise 0,l D/G, wobie D der Korndurchmesser und G die radiale Wachstumsgeschwin-

digkeit sind. Bei kleinen Wachstumsgeschwindigkeiten niihert sich die Gesetzmiissigkeit der Umwsnd-

lungsgeschwindigkeit derjenigen fiir regellose Verteilung der Keimhildungsstellen. Schliesslich werden

die Bedingungen diskutiert. die dafiir massgebend sind, an welcher Art van Keimbildungsstellen die

meisten Keime entstehen und die somit den Verlauf der Umwandlungsgeschwindigkeit bestimmcn.

It has recently been suggested by Clemm and (junctions of 4 grains), and will be progressively greater

Fisher(l) that the nucleation energy at a junction of as, one considers edges (junctions of 3 grains), grain

grain boundaries could be less than at a plane boundary surfaces, and the interior of grains. It is

boundary, and that these junctions might be favored the purpose of this paper to explore the suggestion

sites for nucleation. However, there are two factors of Clemm and Fisher, by deriving the rate laws associ-

opposing this purely energetic consideration. One ated with reactions nucleating at such sites, developing

factor results from the ease with which these sites can t.he limits under which a particular site is favored, and

transform, and might lead to a situation where these examining some of the characteristics of such a

sites lie wholly in transformed material at a time early reaction.

in the reaction and, hence, be no longer available to In a polycrystalline material, nucleation is assumed

nucleation. The other factor, affecting the nucleation to occur with characteristic frequencies on four t,ypes

rate, is the number of atoms associated with each type of sites. We shall designate the homogeneous nuclea-

of nucleation site. This will be least for corners tion frequency per unit volume as I,, the specific

grain boundary nucleation frequency per unit area as

*Received November 18, 1955. I,, the specific edge nucleation frequency per unit

eneral Electric Research Laboratory, Schenectady,

&w%ork. length as I,, the specific corner nucleation frequency

ACTA METALLURGICA, VOL. 4, SEPTEMBER 1956 449

1

450 ACTA METALLURGICA, VOL. 4, 1956

per corner as 1,. We should also like t*o define nuclea- for considerable distance from a growing particle,

tion frequencies per unit volume for each type of Johnson and Mehlc2) derived the rate law for grain

site, r;,, lir,, &,, SC. If S, L, C are respectively the boundary nucleation by assuming that the trans-

boundary area, edge length, grain corner number formation product could not grow across grain

(all per unit volume), then SV = I,; 8, = I$; boundaries. It will be necessary t.o examine this

8, = I,L; NC = ICC. The total rate of nucleation assumpt,ion in detail. At high nucleation rates many

per unit volume AT= Szl + gir, + Se -+- gC. nuclei per grain will form and the reaction will be

In order to compare expressions complaining 8, L, substantially eomplete when Gt is of t.he order of the

and C, it will be necessary to express them approxi- grain diameter. At low nucleation rates the reaction is

mately in terms of CL

grain diameter. If we assume that far from complete at that time. If one assumes that

all grains are equally large tetrakaidecahedra arranged the transformation product cannot grow across

so that they fill space [a body-centered-cubic array boundaries, then the fraction transformed will be

orient,ed so that the square faces are in (100) planes, equal to the fraction of the grains in which a nucleus

and hexagonal faces in (111) planes] and call the has formed, with a correction for that fraction of the

distance between

square faces D, then the edge untransfor~ned volume which is in grains which are in

length will be D/242. The number of grains per unit the process of transforming. This correctSion becomes

volume are 2/O, and a constant fraction of the untransformed volume at

5 = 3.350-l, time greater than the time it takes a nucleus starting

at time 0 to consume its grain, that is, at t > D/G.

I; = 8.5D-2, (1)

(This is true whether the nucleation rate is high or low,

C = 12.OD-3.

except that when it is high, at t = DIG the reaction is

While the act,ual numerical constants in equations close to completion.) Indeed, Johnson and Mehls

(1) are to be taken as approxiinate, the functional analysis at t > D/G reduces t,o

dependence on D is assumed to be exact,

1 - X = (1 + K)e-~B21~t,

DERIVATION OF THE RATE LAWS

where E is the constant* which denotes the fraction of

Nucleation and growth reactions fall into two the untransformed material which is in grains in the

broad classes. The first,

termed discontinuous, process of transforming. One predicts, therefore, that

will be treated in this report. In this class of reactions, where grain boundaries are not crossed by the growing

the transformation product which nucleates and grows transformed material, and where K is small, a plot of

has the same average composition as the untrans- log log (l/l - z) vs. log t would rapidly approach

formed material, and, except for a short distance slope unity whenever t > I)/@.

from the advancing interface, the untransformed An alternate assumption, and one which will be

material has the original composition. One can assume treated here, is that grain boundaries offer no resistance

that, after a time, steady-state conditions are achieved to a growing nodule. It is believed that this assump-

in which both the growth rate and the specific tion is a better approximation to the true situation.

nucleation rate are

independent of time. This Wherever grain boundaries stop a nodule, nucleation

assumption will be treated first. In the last section we on the other side appears to be greatly enhanced, and

shall trea,t the case where, for some reason, steady- this situation should be better approximated as

state conditions are not achieved in the nucleation

rate during a significant part of the reaction time.

The other class, to be discussed more fully in a

subsequent paper, is where the transformation

product is of a different composition and the untrans-

formed material is gradually changing composition.

Here the nucleation rate in the untransformed

material may be a strong function of time and distance where 6 = g ; z and y EUPC

dummy variables;

from a growing transformed region, because the (1 + ?/)2-a

and w = exp (4nb [ -(I -Y -z)

nucleation rate is a strong function of composition. 1 4Y 1

In the case of grain boundary nucleated reactions 1+?/+z

+(1+Y--~ogY+(l+Y)log~+

(and incidentally, for reactions which nucleate on

+ z lo_ (1 + z/P - x2

dislocations), the high diffusivity in a boundary could 0

4 II

be expected to affect furt,her nucleation drastically K is a function of b only. For small b, K is proportional to 6.

CARX: GHAIN BOUNDARY

contSinued growth and ncrt as the relatkely rare from a plane or edge, assuming that these are only

~~~~~~~n~~ of original ~~oleat,ion. impinging with nodules origin&ing from the same

fn the study of pea,rlite, for instance, where the plane OPedges. One next considers a random distri.

parameter b is small, a plot of Iog Iog (l/i - 2) vs, bution of planes or edges each giving rise tn a certain

lag the usudy results in a slope of 4 or more? which transformed v&me, and considers irn~i~~e~nent

is &e dope one WRUIdsxpe& from rand~mI~ d&k=i- a~~~~~~ L&se volnmes.

but.ed nodules growing with no res~rietian to their For the case of corner ~I~cIeat.iu~~,

it is just. assumed

%%~a1size except inlping~n~ent with one another, that tShe corners are randomly distributed, and

The occurrence of a,slope of more than 4 appears ta be limited in number.

due to t.ransienLeffects in nucleation.

The derivation of t,he rate laws center around tke

pmblem of ~~inge~~el~t:. The newly formed grain is

assumed to grow at cor~tsnt radiaI velocity until it

impinges on another growing grain. ft then st~3p3

growiq along the area of e#nta.i.&1%KiIl be e~i~~eR~e~~~

ta use a device used by Avrami,@) a.nd Johnson and

Mehl called extended volume fraction &X4.This is the

sum of the volumes of all grains, divided by the total

~olumc, ~s~~~i.~~gthat the grain5 never stop growing

and t*hatnew grains keep nucleating at the same rate

in transfornl~ as well us untransf~r~~ed material,

XT, can esmd unity, 1-f nucleators is randomly

dis~ri~~uted,then the a&al volume fraction X is

rigoronsly given by

xEZZ.2 -@--X6

fraction and an extended line fraction. The extended

area fra~caiionYe is the sum of aff areas of ~~~~rsee~io~

af the extended grains with a plane divided by the

total area of the plane. If t*hese ~n~rsectio~~s are

randomly distributed on the plane, tie actual area

-0 X>l

fraction

Y-l: 1. -&?-ye

distributed on R

The exkended Iine fraction Z, is the snm of all lengths p = 1- g-IV*,

of a line intercep%d by exkended grains divided by the The v&me oecnpied by nodules ~~iginat,ing fsom &

length of the line. ITfthese ~l~t~r~e~~~~~~s

are modernly uni% area of B is &en

~istrib~~~edon the line, the actual Iine fraction Pm

For the case of grain boundary and grain edge The exknded volume fraction due to a b~und~y area

n~~cleat~ reactinns, two types of ~rn~~ngel~en~wiU be S per unit volume

treated separat,ely. Thie first type is impingement;

among nodules ~r~ginati~~~from the same pIma OF where

sdge. For example, if this ~oenrs early in the reaction,

the individual nodules would cease growing parallel to

the plane or edgee, further growth only occurring

~~r~en~~~~a~ $0 the edge or plane. Armeq3re8sion is

derived for bhe total volume of the nodules o~gina~ing

462 ACTA METALLURGICA, VOL. 4, 1956

and if this boundary area is assumed randomly time at a time between t and t + dt is e-c dt. The

distributed in the specimen extended volume fraction at time t is therefore

x, = c - G3(t - T)~ exp ( -1,~) &-

fs(a,) was evaluated numerically, using Simpsons I0 3

id&

and = b~-3~(u~} W

Grain Edge Nucleation X = 1 - exp [ -b,3f,(a,)]

Consider a straight-line edge E of infinite extent where a, = I,t

having a specific nucleation rate I,. Consider an

arbitrary line P parallel to E at SLdistance T. A

nodule starting to grow at time r from E will intercept

on P a length ~~(~~)= ac3 - 3ac2 + &z, - 6 (1 - e-Q),

2[Gz(t - ~~~- +]lfi when G(t - T) > r, which is the same as the expression derived and

0 G(t - T) < r. tabulated by Avrami for a limited number of randomly

distributed nucleation sites.c4) The three functions

The extended length fraction at time t due to nodules f(a) are tabulated in Table 1.

starting at a time between 7 and r + dr is

= 0 G(t - 7) ( T. It will be noticed that all of the above rate laws can

be plotted as log log (111 - XI) vs. log t to give

Integrating with respect to t and substituting x for

characteristic master curves, Figs. 1-3, in which two

r/Q& we get

parameters are undetermined as additive scale factors.

__- 1+2/l-9 Thus, instead of a family of curves obtained by

d1-~2-~210g--~-~- - x<l,

2 I

Johnson and Mehl, a single curve is obtained. The

parameters of Johnson and Mehl are related t,o the

zzz.z 0 x> 1. parameters a and 6 in the following way: The bs are

The volume occupied by nodules originating from a equivalent to Johnson and Mehls shape factor 1, in

unit length of E is that they can both be expressed as 8jD4/G times a

1 geometrical constant. The us are respectively

v,z m2?7rZ ar = 2rG2t2 ~(1 - eeze) ax. (4) proportional to bs13Z, b,l12Z, and b,Z. All curves have

10 s0 slope 4 when a is small and approach the equation

Randomly distributing an edge length L in zt unit X = 1_ p/3&GP

volnme will give

which is identical with that, obtained for randomly

X = 1- exp f-b,-lf,(u,)]

placed nucleation sites. In the vicinity of a = 1, the

where

curves change slope. This change of slope is due to a

process which we shall call site saturation. In the case

of corner nucleation it occurs because there are only a

limited number of corners. In the case of grain

boundary and edge nucleation it occurs because the

nucleation sites are not randomly distributed, but

$,(a8) was evaluated, using Simpsons rule. are in the vicinity of other nucleation sites. Hence,

they have a greater probability of being transformed.

Comer Nucleation Therefore, the fraction of boundary area or edge

Here there is no problem about impingement length transformed is larger than the volume fraction

between nodules starting from the same corner. transformed, and the nucleation rate which is pro-

The first nucleus is the only one which will determine portional to the untransformed area or length drops

how much volume will contribute to the extended off faster than the untransformed volume. In the

volume. If the specific nucleation rate per corner is I,, limit of a > 1, nucleation is so small conlpared to the

then the fraction of corners nucleating for the first untransformed volume fraction that the curves can be

CAHN: GRAIN BOUNDARY SUCLEATED REACTIOXS 463

that all nucleation occurred everywhere at time zero.

For small values of the parameter b, the increase in

probability for a boundary to be transformed com- t 1O-

-7

saturat,ion will not occur until the sample is almost I-

PI l-

completely transformed. It will occur early in the .?

reaction if b is large. Substituting the approximate

d

values of S, L, and C into the expressions for b, we get II

0 1.1

2

0

O*(11-

O-0( )l-

0.1

100 on grain edges.

or

10

t which is independent of grain size.

At very large values of b the sites would saturate

-, t: , very early in the reaction, and furt.her nucleation

0

would cease. For a grain boundary nucleated reaction

?

the t,ransformed region would occupy an ever-

2

y; 0.1 thickening slab of material with the original boundary

at its center. The rate law would then be of the form

2

e

001

which is wha,t equation (3) approaches. Sirnila.rl~,

one would expect that for edge-nucleated reactions

O.OOll

0.1 10 1 100

as -

FIG. 1. Master curve for t,ransformations which nucleat,e which is the limit of equation (5) for large values of b.

on grain boundary surfaces.

the reaction can be obt,ained from the Figs. l-3 by

finding a value of b for which the reaction would bend

in the vicinity of half reaction. From this, one gets

that whenever

g, > 6 x lo3 G/D4,

Or

reaction.

The time at which saturation occurs is

t Z (I *~2)-1/3 a, -

Fm. 3. Xaster curve for transformations which nncloate

zzzz(f,G)-13,

on grain corners.

454 ACTA METALLURGICA, VOL. 4, 1956

especially for corner nucleation, the kinetic data will

not curve much in the observed range, but will appear

to give a fairly straight line of intermediate slope.

Grain Size

The time required for a reaction to reach a certain

stage of completion is a convenient parameter for

cataloging the speed of a reaction. The relationships

involving the half-time will be discussed here, but

0.01

they can be generalized to the time for any fraction

0.1 1 10 100 1000 completion by substituting for ln 2, In (l/l - X),

where X is the desired fraction.

(2, M,,, W

Substituting 0.5 for X, and a = a(t,n), where tlls is

FIG. 4. Theoretical curves for half-times of transformations

which nucleate on grain boundary surfaces.

This Paper

Johnson and Mehl------

X = 1 _ e-- $CG3t3

sites which nucleate at an early time.

The range from 17/o reaction to 99% reaction is

quite short, only a factor of 500 on the log (l/l - x)

scale. or 2.7 cycles on the log log (l/l - Z) scale.

Since this is the limit of observation, most kinetic

0.01

observations will be entirely in the straight-line

0.1 1 10 100 1000

extremes of Figs l-3. Saturation will usually occur

E

before 1% reaction, or not till after 99% reaction. LxGt,,2 -

G

Only in those reactions where parameter 6 is such that FIG. 6 Theoretical curve for half-times of transformations

which nucleate on grain corners.

the inequalities (7) are close to being equalities, will

upon rearrangement

6 l/3 =fs(G

S

In2

b _fe(ae)

e

In2

,I,3 =fc(o

c

In2 .

between the Is, CTI,

D, and t,,%,for the various types of

nucleation sites.

0.01 0.1 10 100 Of particular interest is the relationship between

($)%k,,, _ t 1,2 and grain size, keeping the Is and G fixed

(constant temperature).

FIG. 5 Theoretical curve for half-times of transformations

which nucleate on grain edges. Substituting the approximate expressions for

CARN: GRAIN ROUKJJARY NUCLEATED REACTIOXX 45.5

S, L, C into the bs and rearranging, we obtain should incrertse with the inverse diameter squared.*

At sufficiently la*rgegrain diameter, the grains have no

trouble nucleating, and the half.time is the time

required for the growing transformation product to

consume balf of its grain, which va.ries directly as the

d&meter.

The following conclusions can be drawn from t,he

curves: (1) If, and only if, site saturation occurs,

D = 4.18 [f&~~)]~~,

G4/2 is a8pproximately equal to O.lD. This corre-

since sponds to the upper portion of the curves, and is

independent of the type of nucleating site. (2) tr,, can

never be appreciably fess than 0.1 DIG for any reaction

where nucleat,ion occurs only on boundaries or

i~ltersect~ons of boundaries. (3) At su&iently tow

values of the parameter, b = ~~~4lG), the half-time is

given approximately by (&Gs)-rI, if the trsnsforma-

tion prodnct cnn cross boundaries. This is the same

result one would expect for homogeneous nucleation.

Since the fs are i~de~endeni~ of ,aa,in size, sub-

a plot of as against9.7 $,(a,); as against 8.8r~e.(~~)~~~3~

&it&ion into ($?Ga)--1~4 leads to the result tha,t t,,, is

of a, ngainst 4.18 ~C(uC)]1/3 is a plot of I) against Gi& proportional t.o the .ZW4 for boundary nucleation,

for the various types of nucleation, v&h D and G&, EPs for surface nucleat~ion,Df4 for corner nucleation,

plotted in the same units and Gfl to the appropriate as well as D1 for site saturat,ion and I>a for homo-

power as the scale factor. This is plotted in Figs. 4-6 geneous nueleiltion.

on a double log plot. The scale factor is now an

ndditive constant. Since it is the same additive

Rates if More Than One Ty-pe of&&? is Active

constant, the only permissible translation for the

Whenever more than one type of site i+ active,

master curves, if fG is unknown, is along a 45 line.

the impingement problem is considerably more

Also, points having a certain vahe of ~~~~!~~~~ are

oompficoted. Certa*inlimits can be discussed, however.

constrained to he on a certain 45 tine. A (~~~~~~~~)

Until one type of site begins t,o saturate, the rate law

axis is therefore indicated.

can be approximated by

l?igs. 4-6 can be used to obtain relationships

between Gtriz, D, and f/G, or any of their ~ornbin~t~o~s~

if the type of site responsible for nucleation is known.

A knowledge of the parameter It for example is where .& is the sum of all the $%.

sufficient to determine the value of i~~~~~~~ and the Because of t,he geometry, when the boundaries

parameter a. An ex~rimenta~~y determined relat,ion- saturate, the edges and corners saturate too, regardless

ship among these parameters oan be used to determine of their specific nucleation rate. When the edges

what type of sit,e is xesponsible for nucleation. For saturate, the corners saturate too, while the boundaries

comparison, the curve obtained from Johnson and can continue to nucleate. When corners saturate,

Mehls equations is also plotted (Fig. 4-dotted curve). both edges and boundaries can continue to nucleate.

The agreement is very good along the upper portion The sat.uration of a type of site Emits ail further

(rl_IP~$). However, one sees immediately that one nucleation on sites of lower dimensional~ty. t_

consequence of the ass~l~ption tha~t the trans-

formation product cannot cross a grain boundary is *Another way of looking at it is that. w-hen the grains

that, at small enough grain size, the reaction rate become sufficiLtntly small, the volume nucleation rate will

increase as tho surface area or as l/t>, while the amount of

decreases as the grain size decreases. This is apparent transform&ion per nucleus will decrease as P. The over-all

if one considers the consequences of that assumption. rate will decrease as P, and the half-time will incres,se I~Rl/D*.

For grain-edge and grain-corner nucleat,ion the half-times

At sufficiently small grain size the time for half- will similarly depend on D- end Do instead of 2P2 and Da.

reaction will be that required for half of the grains to $For convenience, we shall refer to the dimensionalitg of Q

site as heing 0 for corners, 1 for edges, 2 for boundaries, 3 for

obtain at Last one nucleus. However, t;he area hmnogeneous nucleation. It is intended only as a notation,

a.vailable for each grain t,o receive a nucleus decreases and what foXlows does plot hold for nucleation on other types of

sites to which a ~~e~siona~~y can be assigned, such as

as the square of its diameter, and the half-time vacancies, dislacation, etc.

456 ACTA METALLURGICA, VOL. 4, 1956

on the hype of site as well as the relative values of

the 8s. The important site initially is the one whose

3 is the largest. Prom the inequalities (7) one can see

that only sites of lower dimension than this site can

saturate at an earlier time. If they do, they cease

nucleating, and their effect on the rat*elaw is one of

changing 2 in equation (9) to a lower value. When t.he

type of site with the largest contribut.ion to g

saturates, the rate law is approximated by a,dding the

extended volumes of sites, of higher dimensionality

only, to the extended volume of the site whose rj is

largest. If the 1?)7sare much smaller, these sites will

never oontr~bute much. If t,hey are of comparable

magnit~~de, the react,ion rate wiif eventualfy be

domil~at.ed by the new mode. The final stage will be

u 05 1.5 2.0

dominated by the mode of highest dimensional&y

I?-

where the inequalities (7) hold.

FIG. 5. Grain boundary nucletbtion

The half-time will beof the orderof O.lD,/G whenever _---_- Chin edze nucleation

one or more types of sites saturate early. If none ---- Grain coker nucleation

R,elative nucleation energies.

saturate, it will be given approximately by (J&P-1/4.

Therefore the half-time will depend on grain size in

a way characteristic of the mode which ~o~~tribut~ AF, could be expected to dif&r from t-hat of the other

most to t,he volume nucleation. types of sites.

The calculation of nucleation rate is critically

NUCLEATION RATES dependent on the assumption one has to make to

calculat-e AF*. However, to illustrate the relation-

It was noted in t~helast section that it is necessary

ships obt,ained, we shall use the calculations of Clemm

to know something about the relative nucleation

and Fisher,(l) who assumed no strain energy, and a

rates for the various types of sites in order to determine

surface energy which was independent of orientation

which rate law the system will follow. It is also

and ~ur~~a~ur~. One can express their value of

neeessay to know something about the nucleation

A.F, a,s AFj* = AjAFe*, where AFe* is the homo-

rate relat,ive to G/P in order to determine whether a

geneous nucleation energy and the param&er Aj

site will saturate.

which is a function of the ratio K of bonndary energy

We will assume that the specific nucleation rates

to nucleus surface energy only. Fig. 7 is a plot of

are given by equations of the form

rlj versus t.his ratio. It will be noted that B decreases

moriotoni~ally as one goes to nu~l~a~io~~sites of

wt lower dinlensi~~~~ality. The expo~~e~~tial term in

equation (11) favors sites of lower d~tnensionali~y.

where Y is a frequency factor, p the density of sites,

The degree to which this occurs is a function of AFo*

AP* is the minimum free energy required to form a

as well as the differences in the As for the various sites.

nucleus, and AFd is the free energy of activat,ioil

Opposing the energy consideration is t.he density of

for a nucleus to continue to grow. If S is an effective

sites effect, which is (6/QAj, and which favors sites

grain boundary thickness and ~athe number of atoms

of higher dimensionality. The ratio of these two

per unit volume, p approximately equals ~(6/D)~-j.

opposing factors

Y and AFh can be assumed tzobe the same for a.11 sites.

The volume nucleation rate for each site is then

approximately

rates on sites of dimensioI~~~1it.y

i and .i, we get that

assumed to include hon~ogeneous nucleation, although

CAHN: GRAIN BOUNDARY NUCLEATED REACTIONS 457

useful to sketch in several const,ant nucleation rate

curves. If we assume vnexp (-AF,)/(kir) = lo30

cm-3 se&, D = 1O-2 cm, 6 = 10-s cm, we can obtain

four curves (Fig. 9). The lowest figure is that for

& = 1 cmW3see-l, which can be taken as a lower limit

of nucleation rate, the next three curves are those

which obey the inequalities (7). The curves for

saturation of sites of higher dimensionalities are

continued into regions of lower dimensionality, since,

after saturation of the lower site, the higher sites will

continue to nucleate and will saturate too if R is

large enough. From Fig. 9 it is apparent that under

certain conditions one might never see nucleation of

sites of lower dime~ionality, because the under-

cooling required to get appreciable nucleation might

place the reaction at a value of R where a higher mode

of nucleation predominates.

In order to estimate what to expect as a function of

undercooling, let us express APO* in terms of a

0 05 1.0 1.5 2.0

reduced temperature. 0 = TIT,,,, where T,,, is the

k-

FIG. 8. Regions showing which type of site has equilibrium temperature. AFo* is then approximately

the highest initial nucleation rate.

_f__

and 3 (AII?)~kT,, (1 - 8)28

;j! log, $, = (i - j) R - (A$ - Aj)

0* 3 where AH is the heat of the reaction, and y is the

The requirement that &$ is greater than &+ is then nucleus surface energy. Then

that 3fAf02kT,,, log D/S

(i -j) R < JIi - Ai R =

f @(l - 0)s

167~y3

and the maximum R

(AH)2 Teq log D/S

R *,tax- -___-_ at 8 = l/S.

36ay3

inequalities hold for all j, then in this interval, sites j

will contribute most t,o the nucleation rate. For the

As determined from Fisher and Clemm, the sites

which will have the highest nucleation rate are t

the edges when A, - A, < R < A, - A,

the boundaries when A, - A, < R < 1 - A,

and homogeneous nucleation will predominate when

R > 1 - A,. Fig. 5 is a plot of these regions.

It is quite conceivable t,hat in an actual system

some sites will exist which will never contribute

significantly t,o N. If, for example,

A, > &-;/! k-

FIG. 9. Typical example showing conditions for bar+

edge nucleation would never predominate, and the detectable nucleation 1; nucleation sufficiently rapid for

corner saturation 2; edge saturation 3, boundary surface

area marked edge in Fig. S would be absent. saturation 4.

455 ACTA METALLURGICA, VOL. 4, 1956

R rises initially as the undercoo~ng squared reaehes Similarly, one can derive an expression for homo-

GM, at e = 8, and has a very long plateau. If R,,, geneous nucleation, using J, for the number of nuclei

is small for certain values of K, only modes of lower present at time zero. This leads to

dimensionality will ever predominate. If R,,, is large,

R in the regions of interest in Figs. 8 and 9 can be X,=l.-eq-:;IG3t3[Jv

taken as proportional to undercooling squared.

At high nucleat,ion rates and long times, equation ( 12)

that the nucleation rate is not constant,, but a function

reduces to

of time.f5s 6, This may be due to the fact that it takes

X = 1 - ,-2SGL

a finite time to establish a steady-stat,e nucleation

rate,(T) or as in the case of eutectoids it might be due and equation (13) reduces to

to the fact that two phases have to be nucleated, the

X = 1_ e-dG2tZ

second nu~leat~g in the changing environment of the

first growing by itself, or nucleating on an ever- Since

increasing surface of the first.(s)

Hull, Colton, and Mehl(Q have derived the rate law

for homogeneous nucleation, when the nucleation

rate can be expressed as a power series of time. at high nucleation rate and long times, equation (14)

It is fairly simple to generalize the derivations of reduces to

the rate laws given here to include a time-dependent

nucleation rate I as well as the prior existence of

nuclei, which instantan~usly start growing at These limits are identical w%h those previously

time 0. Let us call the number of such nuclei per derived for constant nucleation rate. Site saturation

unit area of boundaries J,, per unit length of edges J,, exists and leads to a rate law which is independent of

and the fraction of corners which have these nuclei the nucleation rate, whether constant or not.

J,. Then as before we will assume that only one type At the other extreme, far from saturation, equations

of site is active. (12), (13), and (14) reduce t,o equat,ion (15). This is

The deriva.tions lead to accomplished by expanding the exponentials in the

integrand into a power series and interchanging the

order of integration.

Far from saturation, then, the nucleation rate does

not enter as an average as has often been assumed,

but as a third moment about the time t. In other

words, the nuclei are weighted according to the cube

of the length of time they have been in existence.

for grain boundary nueleat~on; The determination of the n~~cleat,ion rate from a

rate law is therefore a very complicated problem.

X, = I - exp Even for equation (15), which has a simple solution

mathematically,

1 P log (1 - X)

x exp & = - s7Tc3-.-.-~-~~~

at4

x I,((1-g2- Y2]12dr))

dy]) (13) it is unlikely t,hat kinetic data can be obt,ained with

sufficient accuracy to make t,his solution useful.

for edge nucleation; and If the nucleation rate follows an expression of the

type

X,=1-exp(~CC$3~~-(l-J~)~

Ij = Njt

X 1,(1 --:I3 X exp (-llOdi) dr]) (14) it is possible to integrate equations (12-15). A plot of

log log (l/l - 2) against log t would be similar to

for corner nucleation. those of Figs. 13, except that the initial part of the

CAHN: GRAIN BOUNDARY NUCLEATED REACTIONS 459

curve would have slope 4 + n. The parameters a and where K = B,S, B,L, or B,C respectively for grain

b would become of the form boundary, edge, or corner nucleation. The dependence

a, = (BSG2)11(a+n). t of h/2 on grain size far from saturation would then be

B,

b,= ~

S:j+nGl+n

b, =

Be

Ll +nlZC;rl

+?I

REFERENCES

a = B l/(1+12) . t

c G

1. P. J. CLEMM and J. C. FISHER Acta Met. 3. 70-73 (1955).

b, =-

Bc 2. W. A. JOHNSONand R..F. MEHL Trans. Amer. Inst: Min.

(J(l+n)/3@+n Met. En+ 135, 416-442 (1939).

3. M. AVRAMIJ. Chem. Phys. 7, 1103-1112 (1939); 8,212-224

The half-time at saturation would be independent of (1940); 9, 177-184 (194-l).

4. J. E. BURKE and D. TURNBULL Progress in H&l Physics

the nucleat.ion rate, while the expected half-time at 3, 226 (1952).

low nucleation rates would be 5. E. SCHEIL and A. LANGEWEISE Arch. Eisen~hiittenw 11,

93 (1937).

6. F.C.HULL,R.A.COLTON,~~ R.F.MEHL Trans. Amer.

t,,, = Inst. Min. Net. Eng. 150, 185-207 (1942).

7. D. TURNBULL Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Met. Eng. 175,

774 (1948).

8. J. C. FISHER, from ASM Symposium on Thermodynamics

in Physical Metallurgy, p. 201-241.

- Damage Analysis of Welded JointsЗагружено:spalaniyandi
- Materials Science EngineeringЗагружено:Faisal Saif
- Past ManualЗагружено:Deyni Lorena
- calcium sulfate dihydrate in the presence of magnesium and aluminum.pdfЗагружено:nashat arar
- 60. Ceramic Brackets Something Old, Something New, A Review. Sem in Orthod, 3 178-189, 1997. S. Bishara, D.E. FehrЗагружено:husamsamia
- Unit 2.4 Graphs of Logarithmic Functions_keyf2011Загружено:Jim Chen
- capgeminiЗагружено:Anjani Kumar Rai
- chem lab 1 docЗагружено:CarlySunshine
- Concrete TechnologyЗагружено:Kaushal Kumar
- LogarithmЗагружено:ursml12
- Recovered_PDF_17199.pdfЗагружено:eidelsayed
- Linear, Log and VdB Vibration Velocity UnitsЗагружено:tiagofer84575
- RenLong_SCSETS_2009_Has Measured Misorientation Between DRX Grains and Their Neighboring Deformed GrainsЗагружено:Chandra Clark
- Introduction and Classification of Defects According to DimensionalityЗагружено:Salem Karrab
- Chapter 2 Crystal StructureЗагружено:Renu Sekaran
- facansyЗагружено:Dhesa Hidayat
- 19-math30-1-exemplars_20170830Загружено:Jason Graser
- Experimental Validation of Condensing FlЗагружено:rudi setiawan
- Fractal InterpolationЗагружено:Shinta Elpatrika Abelia
- Sta AssainmentЗагружено:Imran Kabir
- Sharp EL 512Загружено:Tms Arn
- bop.pdfЗагружено:isaac
- b 03406013020Загружено:theijes
- CHE594_C1W01Загружено:John
- LogЗагружено:Sanchit
- acta2Загружено:José Pinto
- Talari-M.K._Effect-of-diluents-on-crystallite-size-and-electronic-band-gap-of-ZnO-nanoparticles-synthesized-by-mechanochemical-processing_2013.pdfЗагружено:talari007
- JALCOM-D-14-09005R2Загружено:d_nagarajan
- physics labЗагружено:api-130453141
- Latest Notes and ErrataЗагружено:Benji Elpeke

- 1994.pdfЗагружено:fdcarazo
- li1998Загружено:fdcarazo
- Phase DiagramsЗагружено:jerfmos
- Solidification 2Загружено:fdcarazo
- Abstract CALPHAD 2018 Garcia LauraЗагружено:fdcarazo
- programPM.pdfЗагружено:Fernando
- Ple and NpleЗагружено:fdcarazo
- Paper HansenЗагружено:fdcarazo
- 5404-22637-1-PBЗагружено:fdcarazo
- Fem Approach to Simulating Al QuenchЗагружено:fdcarazo
- mechanicsofMaterialsVol42-2010-pp31-43.pdfЗагружено:fdcarazo
- 97_four_laws_+free_energyЗагружено:fdcarazo
- 11661_2016_3430_AuthorЗагружено:Fernando
- 1-s2.0-S0029801814003023-mainЗагружено:Fernando
- 8i3a Review on Jominy Test and Determination of Effect of Alloying Elements on Hardenability of Steel Using Jominy End Quench Test Copyright IjaetЗагружено:Praveen Sp
- Takaki 2013Загружено:fdcarazo
- Divergent Pearlite in a Manganese Eutectoid Steel 1963 Acta MetallurgicaЗагружено:fdcarazo
- 1-s2.0-S0020768304006596-mainЗагружено:fdcarazo
- document-3.pdfЗагружено:fdcarazo
- Stored Energy and Structure in Top Down Processed Nanostructured Metals 2009 Scripta MaterialiaЗагружено:fdcarazo
- Model_Martensite to Austenite Phase Transformation Kinetics in an Ultrafine-grained Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel_acta 2011Загружено:fdcarazo
- Hsu 2005Загружено:fdcarazo
- Hansen 2005Загружено:fdcarazo
- Dual Phase 2014Загружено:fdcarazo
- Complementary Use of Transmission Electron Microscopy and Atom Probe Tomography for the Investigation of Steels Nanostructured by Severe Plastic DeforЗагружено:fdcarazo
- A New Route to Fabricate Ultrafine Grained Structures in Carbon Steels Without Severe Plastic Deformation 2009 Scripta MaterialiaЗагружено:fdcarazo
- 10.1.1.118.6999Загружено:fdcarazo
- 8.pdfЗагружено:fdcarazo

- Data StructuresЗагружено:rodwellhead
- SW302Загружено:Harsha Varun
- How to Seduce a WomanЗагружено:gsekar74
- Lamb Wave Tomography in Pipe Line StructureЗагружено:Omprakash Mukherjee
- Makalah Pangan_PigmenЗагружено:Bella Ramadhani
- Evidencia 2 Workshop Products and ServicesЗагружено:Daniel Andres Correal
- Grover_Thesis11.pdfЗагружено:Kapil
- 08m13e14 - CAM2 Measure v10.7 - FaroArm Training Workbook - September 2017Загружено:Amit Garag
- Spearman Rho CorrelationЗагружено:Nava Ratnam
- Cigré 640 - A Guide for Rating Calculations of Insulated Cables.pdfЗагружено:Cristian Martinez
- Dental Hygiene - BSЗагружено:University of Louisville
- BCPS Amended Race to the Top budget August 2011Загружено:Carol Pearse Snow
- Projectile Launcher LabЗагружено:Aldo Chow
- alice galoian portfolioЗагружено:api-254093121
- l'oreal: Shampoo warsЗагружено:Constantin Petrovici
- Kiwifruit and apricot ﬁrmness measurement.pdfЗагружено:ntdien923
- Data Migration Good DocumentЗагружено:sambit76
- (1) [New Version][Trainer] Easy Trainer Making _ 2 Dec UpdateЗагружено:nbar128
- On Cyclic Edge-connectivity of FullerenesЗагружено:Kahar Wisanto
- Sample Exam 1 Phys 213Загружено:Julio César Macías Zamora
- Digital FiltersЗагружено:Deeraj Rajkarnikar
- Wg11 RenewableЗагружено:Ankur Jain
- GWBASICЗагружено:MAWiskiller
- Lab 3Загружено:Meower
- AP1000 Assessment Report - Independent Dose AssessmentЗагружено:Jose Deniz
- Mouth-licking by Dogs as a Response to Emotional StimuliЗагружено:Luis Antonio Buitron Ramirez
- GE2155 full lab manualЗагружено:Kishore Vignesh
- GetTRDoc.pdfЗагружено:jijil1
- socratic seminarЗагружено:api-315323061
- Federman, R. & Thomson, J.a. - Facing Bipolar_ the Young Adult's Guide to Dealing With Bipolar Disorder (2010)Загружено:Boyan Vassilev