Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Amy Yang
shape student affair professionals practice in the field. This paper will argue that some of the
crucial, core philosophical positions used in the student affairs field are to not reinvent the wheel,
be aware of the changing student affairs field to meet the needs of students, bridge student affairs
with academic affairs, and give a holistic experience to students. In addition, this paper will
analyze how those positions relate to each other as well as how those positions relate with my
values.
The wheel
One philosophical position in student affairs is that the practitioners should not reinvent
the wheel. Services and resources in functional areas have been put in place in institutions to
assist students. Typically, these services or resources may act as a concrete tradition within the
functional area. Hence, creating change or having innovation could be a challenge because
professionals within that functional area may be uncomfortable to amend the tradition.
Consequently, other colleagues may bring up the comment, do not reinvent the wheel. For
example, practitioners who have worked in their office for a while may dismiss a new idea from
one of their colleagues, especially if that colleague is a newly hired professional. Although their
colleagues may be presenting a well-worth invested idea, they may pull the do not reinvent the
wheel comment because they are blinded by the tradition they have always seen and known.
This idea of how challenging it is to modify traditions and create change parallels with Kuhns
(2012) idea of paradigms. Paradigms are the perspectives and beliefs people have when viewing
the world in their own lens. Student affair professionals may be using their paradigm to
advocate against a new idea being presented because that new idea does not fit within their
3
CSP SELECTION II: DEVELOPING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY
paradigm. Therefore, the position, stay away from reinventing the wheel, could be fatal when
Another philosophical position is that the professionals have to be aware about changes
within the field in order to meet the needs of their students. Student affairs is a field that has
constantly been changing and will continue to change. As a result, the practitioners are
responsible to update themselves with those changes. An example that illustrates how this field
has changed can be seen when examining the student population. Originally, higher education
was created for only wealthy, protestant, and white men (Schuh, Jones, and Harper, 2011). In
addition, student affairs did not exist during the colonial period, and the faculties held the
responsibility of loco parentis, which ultimately gave them the power and role to be the parents
and teachers for students. As time passed, the student population changed from having only
wealthy, white men to having a more diverse population that included minorities, women, and
non-traditional students (Schuh, et al., 2011; AAHE, ACPA, & NASPA, 1997; Keeling, 2004).
Understanding the changes in this field will help professionals understand the transformation of
student learning as well. Today, one of the main purposes to why students invest in higher
education is to be able to find an exceptional job after graduation (Keeling, 2004, 2006).
Consequently, student affairs professionals carry the responsibility to create meaningful and
Holistic Experience
Aside from being aware of the changing field to meet the needs of students, promoting a
holistic experience to students is another philosophical position in student affairs. During the
beginning of higher education, a main outcome of going to college was to create leaders for the
4
CSP SELECTION II: DEVELOPING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY
society and church (Schuh, et al., 2011). However, as higher education transformed and student
affairs emerged, the outcomes of going to college slowly changed to provide a holistic
experience for students and for students to use that experience to be successful after graduation
(Schuh, et al., 2011; ACPA, 1996). Obtaining a holistic experience means that students would
be exposed to learning inside and outside of the classroom, and those learning experiences would
positively contribute to their overall student development. Since promoting a holistic experience
to students is crucial in college, student affairs professionals share accountability to give services
In addition to promoting a holistic experience for students, bridging student affairs with
academic affairs is another philosophical position. The experiences gained from in-class and
curriculums were seen as separate, which was a part of the traditional approach in higher
education (Magolda, 2005). As time passed and higher education developed, the need to align
student affairs with academic affairs became necessary to promote transformative student
learning (Keeling, 2004, 2006). Since student learning occurs inside and outside of the
classroom, this contributes to why bridging student affairs with academic affairs is crucial
(ACPA, 1996; Keeling, 2004). Student affair staff and faculty will be able to communicate and
fulfill the needs of students through partnerships. For example, student affair practitioners in
career services can collaborate with faculty, and faculty can then give their students a career-
related assignment, such as finding tips on how to construct resumes, prior to a workshop that
career services will give. This collaboration will help students have ownership in their learning,
and they may be more likely to gain more insights about resume-writing. Overall, to promote
5
CSP SELECTION II: DEVELOPING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY
and give a holistic experience to students, this partnership needs to occur to help students build
The four positions function in a cyclic, continuous circle, where they all influence one
another. Student affair professionals must be aware of the changing field to meet the needs of
their students. There have been various transformations within higher education and the student
affairs field. Some of those changes are the diverse student population, the purpose of going to
college, and the meaning behind student learning. These changes impact the position, providing
students with a holistic experience. Many students today have multiple roles, and they are more
than just a student (Keeling, 2004). For instance, some students will be a parent and employee
while simultaneously pursuing their education. Hence, they may struggle to balance their
personal life with their professional and academic life. Since the student population is more
diverse and the holistic experience is important for students to have, student affairs have to be
intentional about the services they provide in order to meet the needs of their students. In this
case of non-traditional students, they may need more services to assist their transition back to
college and to feel welcomed in the campus community. The campus community is a learning
environment that influences how students learn as well as create a campus climate (ACPA, 1996;
AAHE, ACPA, & NASPA, 1998). When they feel comfortable and trust their community,
creating and having a holistic experience may be easier. Having a holistic experience may occur
naturally as well because they have one less stress to worry about and may feel happier in an
inclusive environment.
Not only has there been a change in the student population, but there has been a change in
perspective about student and academic affairs. A partnership between student and academic
6
CSP SELECTION II: DEVELOPING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY
affairs is necessary to have to meet the needs of students and provide a holistic experience to
students (AAHE, ACPA, & NASPA, 1998). A part of a holistic experience is student learning.
Student learning used to be thought of occurring only in the classroom setting where students
would retain information from lecture (Keeling, 2004). However, student learning now is
thought to occur inside and outside of the classroom, which helps with transformative learning
(Kneeling, 2004; Kneeling, 2006; ACPA, 1996; Magolda, 2005). In addition, to maximize the
promotion of a holistic experience for students, the partnership between student and academic
fairs must be purposeful. The collaboration between these two affairs must be meaningful,
reciprocal, and responsive (Magolda, 2005). By nurturing a meaningful partnership, these two
affairs will have the opportunity to fill in the gaps of student needs and make positive changes.
When the needs of students are met and positive changes are implemented, students will be more
My values
While student affair professionals strive to be aware of changes to best meet the needs of
their students, ironically, they use the phrase, do not reinvent the wheel. Kuhn states that
human-beings live in and are influenced by paradigms (2012). In this case, the phrase of do not
reinvent the wheel would represent a paradigm. When practitioners in this field use this phrase,
they are using their paradigm to argue against a new paradigm being presented. The
practitioners, who have worked in a particular student services office for a long time, would
believe that they understand how that area functions and operate. Thus they would use their
understanding of how to best serve students in their own or offices way. Student affairs should
use this wheel analogy carefully because if it is used without much thought, then it could inhibit
the philosophical positions I presented before. How would student affair professionals fulfill the
7
CSP SELECTION II: DEVELOPING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY
position of meeting the needs of students if they are unwilling and blinded by their paradigm to
see changes or changes that are needed within the field? I think it is acceptable to be blinded by
ones own paradigm because paradigms in general are hard to see. However, it is not acceptable
to be unwilling to find and be open to new paradigms that comes along the foggy pathway. This
could also then jeopardize the position of promoting a holistic experience to students because the
partnership between student and academic affairs may be inhibited. In order to have a successful
collaboration between these two affairs, they must trust and be open to each others ideas. When
the open-mindedness is disrupted by paradigms, conflict may occur and the level of achievement
to assist student learning may be decreased. Therefore, because student affair professionals may
not know that they are in a paradigm, avoiding the phrase, do not reinvent the wheel, could
Student affair professionals strive to provide opportunities for students to have a holistic
affairs have separated themselves by specialization to meet the needs of their students (Lloyd-
Jones, 1954). Although Lloyd-Jones argued that specialization is deemed to prohibit student
affair practitioners from providing a holistic experience to students, I disagree with that
argument. I actually think the opposite should be promoted. Specialization should be supported,
and specialization is beneficial because it trains student affair professionals in specific areas to
help specific students. If specialization is prohibited, the opportunity to maximally fulfill the
needs of students may not be met. For example, student affair professionals who work in career
services will have more experience and knowledge about resume-writing than other
professionals who work in academic advising services. Thus those professionals in career
services will be more equipped to guide students with their resumes. Furthermore, tailored
8
CSP SELECTION II: DEVELOPING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY
practice, experience, and skills in a specific functional area assist student affair practitioners to
thoroughly understand what services need to be improved or created. Most importantly, bridging
student affairs with academic affairs can be a potential answer to alleviate Lloyd-Jones concern
about specialization. This partnership has to be continual, active, and strived from the institution
collaboration between student affair groups could diminish Lloyd-Jones concern because
specialized individuals who know their functional area will be able to present specific needs to
their collaborators. The collaborators could do the same as well. When this meaningful
partnership occurs and changes are implemented to meet the needs of students, both
collaborators will gain precious knowledge about each other. As a result, they may be able to
help students in other functional areas and know where to navigate students to for more
assistance.
Conclusion
The four philosophical positions, do not reinvent the wheel, be aware of the changing
student affairs field to meet the needs of students, bridge student affairs with academic affairs,
and give a holistic experience to students, work hand in hand with each other. Furthermore, they
play critical roles in this field, and will influence what I would like to have within my future
position. After analyzing the philosophical positions, I think I will leave a position if they
completely believed in the phrase, do not reinvent the wheel, and if they do not value
meaningful collaboration between student affairs and academic affairs. It is very important to be
aware that paradigms shape our practice and for that reason, we must consider or at least be open
to new ideas. Those new ideas may mean we have to reinvent the wheel to see the paradigm and
American Association for Higher Education, American College Student Personnel Association,
& National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1998). Powerful
partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning. Retrieved from http:/
/www.acpa.nche.edu/powerful-partnerships-shared-responsibility-learning
American Association for Higher Education, American College Student Personnel Association,
& National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1997). Principles of good
practice for student affairs. Retrieved from http:/ /acpa.nche.edu/pgp/principle.htm
American College Personnel Association. (1996). The student learning imperative: Implications
for student affairs. Retrieved from http:/ /www.acpa.nche.edu/student-learning-
imperative-implications-student-affairs
Keeling, R. (2004). Learning Reconsidered. Washington, DC: American College Personnel
Association & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
Keeling, R. P. (Ed.). (2006). Learning reconsidered 2: A practical guide to implementing a
campus-wide focus on the student experience. Washington, DC: ACPA, ACUHO-I,
NACADA, NACA, NASPA, & NIRSA.
Kuhn, T.S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (50th Anniversary ed.). Chicago, IL:
The University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd-Jones, E. (1954). Changing concepts of student personnel work. In E. Lloyd-Jones & M.R.
Smith (Eds.) Student personnel work as deeper teaching (pp. 1-14). New York, NY:
Harper.
Magolda, P. M. (2005). Proceed with caution: Uncommon wisdom about academic and student
affairs
Schuh, J. R., Jones, S. R. Harper, S. R., & Associates (Eds.). (2011). Student services: A
handbook for the profession (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Chapters 1, 3, & 4.