Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Case
: A CASE REPORT
1
Dr. Bhavesh vaishnani, 2Dr.Mayank Vekariya,3Dr.Vikrant Patel
A 55 year old female Hindu patient of low socio-economic class presented with the chief
complaint of right upper abdominal and right lower chest pain since 1day after blunt trauma.
H/O trauma while working in farm
No H/O vomiting
No H/O fever
No Burning micturition
INVESTIGATIONS
USG- NAD
Xray chest PA bowel loop like opacity seen in right lower zone anterior aspect S/O
traumatic diaphragmatic rupture with anterior diaphragmatic hernia
About 4.5 to 5.5 cm defect in right dome of diaphragm anteriorly withherniation of large
bowel with mesocolon without any sign of obstruction. S/O Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia
MANAGEMENT
Laproscopic converted to open right side diaphragmatic hernia repair with
meshplasty(7.5*15cm) with right side ICD insertion
Post-operative outcome
Discharge on POD
DISCUSSION
Trauma is the leading cause for acquired diaphragmatic hernias. Incidence of traumatic
diaphragmatic injuries ranges from 5.217%, where in blunt injuries share 0.81.6%.
However,diaphragmatic rupture along with diaphragmatichernia occurs in 3% of abdominal
injuries.Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is more commonin males than in females. Blunt
injury leads to74% of acquired hernias.Delayed presentation occurs in as many as 30%,
because most hernias are small to begin withbut enlarge due to pressure differences
betweenthoracic and abdominal cavities to allow herniation.CT scan is the diagnostic tool of
choice with a sensitivity of 73%.
Signs on CT SCAN
Direct signs Abrupt loss of diaphragm continuity associated with a thickening of the free
edge due to retraction or hemorrhage . More easily spotted when the defect is small or in
contact with the abdominal fat or the aerated lung. No visualization of the hemidiaphragm.
A sign commonly related to large hernial defects . Dangling diaphragm sign. A comma-
shaped curving of the free edge at the rupture site . Associated with the focal thickening of
the torn diaphragmatic edge.
Indirect signs Protrusion of abdominal organs or peritoneal fat into the pleural space .
Collar sign. A sign secondary to the compression of a herniated structure at the site of rupture.
Dependent viscera sign. A reference to the herniated abdominal organ in direct contact with
the posterior thoracic wall . This sign has no interposition of the lung parenchyma. Hump
sign. A consequence of hepatic herniation. Most of the times it is related to a hypodense band
in the hepatic parenchyma between the torn diaphragm edges, a consequence of a
compression-driven hypoperfusion condition. Elevated abdominal organs. The cephalic
displacement of abdominal organs causes the contralateral hemidiaphragm to be at a lower
level. A coronal reconstruction could suggest a rupture if a displacement of more than 5 cm in
the right side and 4 cm in the left side.
Diaphragmatic rupture and subsequent herniation pass through three phases: initial phase, at
the time of trauma; delayed phase, where defect enlarges or herniation occurs
(asymptomatic); and obstructive phase, where patient presents with complications of hernia
.e.g., obstruction,strangulation or posterior rupture.Most common organs that herniated
include stomach, spleen,colon, small bowel and liver. In cases of missed or delayed
diagnosis, mortality rises up to 30%.
Surgical management depends upon time of presentation. In the acute phase, a laparotomy is
indicated. When diagnosed later, a thoracotomy may be performed to address intrathoracic
adhesions Laparoscopy,thoracoscopy or video-assisted thracoscopic surgery (VATS) may be
considered instable patients. In our case, we considered upper midline laparotomy to assess
the bowel for viability.Primary surgical repair is reserved for small defects. For large defects,
mesh may be used. Since right-sided diaphragmatic hernia is rare and difficult to diagnose
initially, patients present with complications increasing risk of morbidity and mortality. A
thorough evaluation of patientscomplaints and past history, detailed examination with
involvement of radiologist will lead to initial accurate diagnosis.
Conclusions
Recognition of a traumatic diaphragmatic hernia in the immediate post-traumatic period is
difficult, due to associated injuries and to the fact that several radiological features suggestive
of hernia may mimic those of chest injuries. A careful history, examination, and awareness of
the possibility of the condition and its complications are essential if these patients are to be
managed successfully. despite significant advances in diagnostic technology, traumatic
diaphragmatic hernias remain challenging entities. Left-sided hernias are generally believed
to be more common, yet we know that the overall incidence of right traumatic diaphragmatic
hernias is likely underestimated. Factors resulting in increased intraabdominal pressure can,
in fact, reveal missed diaphragmatic defects. We accordingly hypothesize that right-sided
diaphragmatic hernias occur at a higher rate than is reported in the literature as the anatomic
lie of the liver impedes visceral incarceration and allows them to remain asymptomatic.
Factors predisposing to increased intraabdominal pressure may be the impetus required to
uncover these missed defects and should be entertained when one encounters a delayed
presentation of a traumatic diaphragmatic hernia.
References
2. Reber PU, Schmied B, Seiler CA, Baer HU, Patel AG, Bchler MW. Missed diaphragmatic
injuries and their long-term sequelae. J Trauma 1998 Jan;44(1):183-188.
3. Mansour KA. Trauma to the diaphragm. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1997 May;7(2):373-383.
8. Singh S, Wakhlu A, Pandey A, Kureel SN, Rawat JD. Hernia 2011. Available at
www.springerlink.com. Accessed on April 26, 2012.