Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Organs at risk (OR) in the treatment area (list organs and desired
objectives in the table below):
Contour all critical structures on the dataset. Place the isocenter in the
center of the PTV (make
sure it isnt in air). Create a single AP field using the lowest photon energy
in your clinic. Create
a block on the AP beam with a 1.5 cm margin around the PTV. From there,
apply the following
changes (one at a time) to see how the changes affect the plan (copy and
paste plans or create
separate trials for each change so you can look at all of them).
Plan 1: Create a beam directly opposed to the original beam (PA) (assign
50/50 weighting to
each beam)
- No; the 95% isodose line encompasses about 95% of the PTV
c. Where is the region of maximum dose (hot spot)? What is it?
- The region of max dose is very posterior and to the right side of the patient.
This is where the
Plan 2: Increase the beam energy for each field to the highest photon
energy available.
a. What happened to the isodose lines when you increased the beam
energy?
patient? Why?
- The hot spot is a little deeper into the patient but still posterior and near to
the surface of the
patient. The dmax depth for 18 MV photons (the highest energy available) is
about 3.3 cm. Lung
didnt reach the lung at 3.3 cm, so it deposited max dose in the posterior part
of the patient. The
AP beam went through lung right away, so it deposited max dose after
passing through the lung.
The combination of the 2 beams led to a hot spot in the posterior part of the
patient.
Plan 3: Adjust the weighting of the beams to try and decrease your hot
spot.
a. What ratio of beam weighting decreases the hot spot the most?
- Weighting the AP beam slightly more heavily than the PA beam decreased
the hot spot the
b. How is the PTV coverage affected when you adjust the beam weights?
great.
Plan 4: Using the highest photon energy available, add in a 3rd beam to
the plan (maybe a
a. When you add the third beam, try to avoid the cord (if it is being
treated with the
-This is the way that worked best for me. Using the other techniques (tighter
blocked margin,
b. Alter the weights of the fields and see how the isodose lines change in
response to
the weighting.
- much more conformal dose and even distribution with the addition of an
oblique beam
c. Would wedges help even out the dose distribution? If you think so, try
inserting
one for at least one beam and watch how the isodose lines change.
- A wedge (22 degrees) on the AP field helped to eliminate some hot spots
and even out the
dose.
Which treatment plan covers the target the best? What is the hot spot
for that plan?
-The plan with the best target coverage was the last plan, AP/PA and one
oblique. The hot spot
Did you achieve the OR constraints as listed above? List them in the table
above.
suggested using 6 MV photons for the AP and oblique beams due to the small
amount of tissue
the beams traveled through before entering the lung. The dose distribution
might be better
-try different gantry angles to conform dose better and stay off critical
structures